FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Not interested replies
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " You’re welcome. Happy swinging | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " Nah you should think 'fuck em' they don't know what they're missing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus " I don't pester the same people but it's just nice to receive the "thanks but no thanks" haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you know how much shit we get when we do try to politely say no thanks though? " us tgirls get exactly the same shit from men on here ya know | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " I don't understand why you would want some false hope of a message received. Do you message back to say thanks for saying no thanks as well? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you know how much shit we get when we do try to politely say no thanks though? us tgirls get exactly the same shit from men on here ya know " I can well imagine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " Just wish the ones who messaged back "I didn't fancy you anyway, you hanging slag" felt the same way | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you know how much shit we get when we do try to politely say no thanks though? " I’d like to say I can imagine. In reality of course, I can’t. We can have no idea. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There needs to be a physical attraction and we always respond to messages. It is amazing how polite most men are and they repond in a friendly way saying thanks for responding. But then there are others who dont understand no!" It's worrying the amount of Beta males on here, messaging back thanking people for saying no thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They're the best aren't they? The ones that say no thanks! I'm sure they are happy you appreciate them ..." Surely the best are those who say yes please? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There needs to be a physical attraction and we always respond to messages. It is amazing how polite most men are and they repond in a friendly way saying thanks for responding. But then there are others who dont understand no! It's worrying the amount of Beta males on here, messaging back thanking people for saying no thanks " Look out the alpha male Studley Moore is back. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There needs to be a physical attraction and we always respond to messages. It is amazing how polite most men are and they repond in a friendly way saying thanks for responding. But then there are others who dont understand no! It's worrying the amount of Beta males on here, messaging back thanking people for saying no thanks Look out the alpha male Studley Moore is back." not a bad username that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be honest, I’m grateful if the message is simply deleted. It pisses me off that a message gets read and then ignored. WTF am I supposed to do with that? How long do I wait wondering if they’re just slow at replying. If it’s a no, please as a minimum, delete. We’ll get the message!! Of course it’s always delightful to enter into a chat. Just saying ... xx " You could always delete it on your end. That way, you won't have to wonder | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There needs to be a physical attraction and we always respond to messages. It is amazing how polite most men are and they repond in a friendly way saying thanks for responding. But then there are others who dont understand no! It's worrying the amount of Beta males on here, messaging back thanking people for saying no thanks Look out the alpha male Studley Moore is back." Best. Username. Ever. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you know how much shit we get when we do try to politely say no thanks though? " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus " Aww you’re just too sweet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Our profile says we’re after couples and single women and we still get messages from single guys. We never message any of them back as they should already be able to see it’s not what we’re looking for. " Surely you can stop inboxes from males to make it easier for both? X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " their ya go good manners appreciated | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " They must be the exception rather than the rule. Im getting fed up of whinging men going on about women who dont reply to initial messages.. Suck it up and move on ffs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. They must be the exception rather than the rule. Im getting fed up of whinging men going on about women who dont reply to initial messages.. Suck it up and move on ffs " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal." I have time to reply to mine.....yeah there isn’t that many to be honest! Unless you post loads of stuff and have a super hot body we don’t get that inundated! Ha ha x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's worrying the amount of Beta males on here, messaging back thanking people for saying no thanks " Try not to lose sleep worrying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's worrying the amount of Beta males on here, messaging back thanking people for saying no thanks Try not to lose sleep worrying " I didn't lose any sleep, just can't believe what I read sometimes on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " Sometimes I don't though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Our profile says we’re after couples and single women and we still get messages from single guys. We never message any of them back as they should already be able to see it’s not what we’re looking for. " Block them from messaging then. Simple. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " If only so many did this i get lots who just read ignore kinda knocks ur confidence abit but even tho its a knock back its still nice to get a replie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. " Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. If only so many did this i get lots who just read ignore kinda knocks ur confidence abit but even tho its a knock back its still nice to get a replie " It's lovely to get a reply but try not to get disheartened when you don't because unfortunately you won't get many | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus " Indeed I feel the same way | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages " Try having a new female profile then. You really have no idea. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be honest, I’m grateful if the message is simply deleted. It pisses me off that a message gets read and then ignored. WTF am I supposed to do with that? How long do I wait wondering if they’re just slow at replying. If it’s a no, please as a minimum, delete. We’ll get the message!! Of course it’s always delightful to enter into a chat. Just saying ... xx You could always delete it on your end. That way, you won't have to wonder " This is what I do. Then I wonder have they not replied because they know I have deleted the message after sending it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Try having a new female profile then. You really have no idea. " Well they might when they get double messages off men thanking them for saying no thanks yeah yeah of course snowed under | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus I don't pester the same people but it's just nice to receive the "thanks but no thanks" haha" They didn't ask you to message them in them first place. So why you feel entilted to recieve a reply, is bewildering to me! Delete without reply is your answer. It's all within site rules. Why bother moaning about those who aren't interested in you?! Makes no sense. Just move on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages " You really do talk some absolute bollocks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus I don't pester the same people but it's just nice to receive the "thanks but no thanks" haha They didn't ask you to message them in them first place. So why you feel entilted to recieve a reply, is bewildering to me! Delete without reply is your answer. It's all within site rules. Why bother moaning about those who aren't interested in you?! Makes no sense. Just move on." What ever happen to manners we was all taught it at school | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks" Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus I don't pester the same people but it's just nice to receive the "thanks but no thanks" haha They didn't ask you to message them in them first place. So why you feel entilted to recieve a reply, is bewildering to me! Delete without reply is your answer. It's all within site rules. Why bother moaning about those who aren't interested in you?! Makes no sense. Just move on. What ever happen to manners we was all taught it at school " Lol abiding by site rules is expressing manners!! Those of you who send messages when you weren't asked to but proceed to whinge about no replies etc.... and those who send messages whereas they clearly do not fit the woman's profile, are the ones lacking manners! Nice to see more on here acting so entilted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Try having a new female profile then. You really have no idea. Well they might when they get double messages off men thanking them for saying no thanks yeah yeah of course snowed under " Women have left because of it. You really know nothing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus I don't pester the same people but it's just nice to receive the "thanks but no thanks" haha They didn't ask you to message them in them first place. So why you feel entilted to recieve a reply, is bewildering to me! Delete without reply is your answer. It's all within site rules. Why bother moaning about those who aren't interested in you?! Makes no sense. Just move on. What ever happen to manners we was all taught it at school Lol abiding by site rules is expressing manners!! Those of you who send messages when you weren't asked to but proceed to whinge about no replies etc.... and those who send messages whereas they clearly do not fit the woman's profile, are the ones lacking manners! Nice to see more on here acting so entilted. " Granted there are many Dick's on here but not all are sort of speak ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " This was a lovely post, thanks OP. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Try having a new female profile then. You really have no idea. Well they might when they get double messages off men thanking them for saying no thanks yeah yeah of course snowed under Women have left because of it. You really know nothing. " What the fakes? you have to verify yourself quickly as a new lady member to be able to message back. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m quite happy when there’s no response - I’ve got no right to expect any response from the woman I message and If I do get a response then I see it as a bonus I don't pester the same people but it's just nice to receive the "thanks but no thanks" haha They didn't ask you to message them in them first place. So why you feel entilted to recieve a reply, is bewildering to me! Delete without reply is your answer. It's all within site rules. Why bother moaning about those who aren't interested in you?! Makes no sense. Just move on. What ever happen to manners we was all taught it at school Lol abiding by site rules is expressing manners!! Those of you who send messages when you weren't asked to but proceed to whinge about no replies etc.... and those who send messages whereas they clearly do not fit the woman's profile, are the ones lacking manners! Nice to see more on here acting so entilted. " They aren't rules, they are answers to FAQs, because so many people delete or block without replying. Admin thought it was nice to explain that it's not to be taken to heart. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated." You have proof from ONE person as your argument? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. You have proof from ONE person as your argument? " No I've met a few as you can see, she was probably the most popular though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. You have proof from ONE person as your argument? No I've met a few as you can see, she was probably the most popular though." It also depends on how long you've been on the site. The longer you've been on here, the less messages you will receive, because you've already rejected them and they don't message as much. Some will get more, some will get less. You can't assume because a few people's experiences are a certain way, that it makes it the general consensus for all females on this site | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. You have proof from ONE person as your argument? No I've met a few as you can see, she was probably the most popular though." Popularity doesn't always equal more messages either. Some may avoid a person who they may deem as out of their league and message someone they would consider more attainable for sex | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. They must be the exception rather than the rule. Im getting fed up of whinging men going on about women who dont reply to initial messages.. Suck it up and move on ffs " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Try having a new female profile then. You really have no idea. Well they might when they get double messages off men thanking them for saying no thanks yeah yeah of course snowed under Women have left because of it. You really know nothing. What the fakes? you have to verify yourself quickly as a new lady member to be able to message back." You don't have to to be verified to message back. I'm assuming you have never had a female profile otherwise you would know this. My friends weren't fakes, just hounded off the site before they could even do a proper profile, set filters etc. I stand by my statement of you really know nothing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated." I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are." I agree. I went away to London for a couple of days recently and forgot to hide my profile I had 200+ messages and it didn’t take 30 mins to read them all and reply to the ones I was interested in. Fact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are." Yeah yeah I believe you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " i don't see what the difference is.... the only thing it tells me is how "delicate" some people are... if you go in with the mindset of "everything is a no, until they say yes".... the attitude is different for the start then i find you don't need the "pep talk".. why do you need any sort of affirmation from someone you have never met and are never going to meet... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you " Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. i don't see what the difference is.... the only thing it tells me is how "delicate" some people are... if you go in with the mindset of "everything is a no, until they say yes".... the attitude is different for the start then i find you don't need the "pep talk".. why do you need any sort of affirmation from someone you have never met and are never going to meet..." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. i don't see what the difference is.... the only thing it tells me is how "delicate" some people are... if you go in with the mindset of "everything is a no, until they say yes".... the attitude is different for the start then i find you don't need the "pep talk".. why do you need any sort of affirmation from someone you have never met and are never going to meet... " These are the sort of people who would try to follow you into a taxi on a night out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " Does it really feel better to have a no thanks?. Its a very definite no then. I would rather live in ignorance and assume they had just missed me in the pile | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next!" Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head." I think she has a perfectly fine head lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head." And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages " 20-30 mins, yeah right. It sometimes takes that much time with one person now taking the no thanks seriously and yo-yo messaging. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head." I’ve also agreed it doesn’t take 20-30 mins at all. Maybe the person you are referring can’t tell the time? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages 20-30 mins, yeah right. It sometimes takes that much time with one person now taking the no thanks seriously and yo-yo messaging. " He’s all but admitted he was lying anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages 20-30 mins, yeah right. It sometimes takes that much time with one person now taking the no thanks seriously and yo-yo messaging. " True. I tried to be polite today, that's exactly what happened lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. I’ve also agreed it doesn’t take 20-30 mins at all. Maybe the person you are referring can’t tell the time? " This reply was worth almost choking on my drink for | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages 20-30 mins, yeah right. It sometimes takes that much time with one person now taking the no thanks seriously and yo-yo messaging. True. I tried to be polite today, that's exactly what happened lol " You can’t win, can you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. I’ve also agreed it doesn’t take 20-30 mins at all. Maybe the person you are referring can’t tell the time? This reply was worth almost choking on my drink for " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages 20-30 mins, yeah right. It sometimes takes that much time with one person now taking the no thanks seriously and yo-yo messaging. True. I tried to be polite today, that's exactly what happened lol You can’t win, can you?" Nope, had to giggle at the time telling post though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught." I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up" Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it." And then sometimes just why should you? Its not a job, only a hobby | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it." There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. " Maybe you two should sort a meet haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. Maybe you two should sort a meet haha" Nah I only play with babes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. Maybe you two should sort a meet haha Nah I only play with babes " She is one lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. Maybe you two should sort a meet haha" God no, I blocked him weeks ago | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. Maybe you two should sort a meet haha God no, I blocked him weeks ago " For an opinion on a thread don't make out I tried to message you or anything because I wouldn't you're definitely not my type. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. " Lots of women get messages from people in other countries, I have messages from the States and Australia regularly. Oh, but if you block then you’re a rude bitch. Ladies can’t win on here, so instead of making it more difficult how about making it a little bit easier and it’ll end up looking good for you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. Maybe you two should sort a meet haha God no, I blocked him weeks ago For an opinion on a thread don't make out I tried to message you or anything because I wouldn't you're definitely not my type." Don’t try and put words in my mouth, I didn’t say you tried to message me. I don’t care if I’m not your type my lovely, because you are DEFINITELY not mine. I wouldn’t fuck you with someone else’s! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. Maybe you two should sort a meet haha God no, I blocked him weeks ago For an opinion on a thread don't make out I tried to message you or anything because I wouldn't you're definitely not my type. Don’t try and put words in my mouth, I didn’t say you tried to message me. I don’t care if I’m not your type my lovely, because you are DEFINITELY not mine. I wouldn’t fuck you with someone else’s!" Just ambiguous your last statement just making it clear and my sentiments are the same. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages You really do talk some absolute bollocks Well that comes from the horse's mouth and she was a popular unicorn. Any evidence to the contrary would be appreciated. I am a popular unicorn, and I’m telling you it’s not possible You cannot read 200 messages, the profiles of the people who sent them and send them a reply in half an hour. Either she was lying or you are. Yeah yeah I believe you Standard response from somebody who knows they’ve been called out on their bullshit, and has no further defence. Thanks for confirming what we already knew. Next! Called out I don't think so, I'm meant to believe because you said so which is debatable don't let the site go to your head. And we were meant to believe you because you said it? Double standards there my darling! I didn’t make any mention of the site going to my head... you know what they say about assumption, don’t you You know you were bullshitting, stop trying to deflect it to cover up the fact. It’s a rat trap, and you’ve been caught. I wasn't bullshitting and I don't see a reason why she would lie. There is only 30,000 people on the site in the whole world. I'm meant to believe 1 lady can't do her own admin in less than an hour even. The math doesn't add up Dear lord, you are so thick that is physically hurts. 30,000 people is a lot of people. Understand? With me so far? A lot of them don’t message just once. That could be two, three, four or more messages. Now, that could be before you’ve even gotten around to messaging them. Then you have to deal with the abuse afterwards. It’s not hard to understand. Again, stop deflecting. Just take it on the chin. I caught you out, love. Just deal with it. There is not 30,000 people on this site in the northwest, that is all over the world. Unless you are so 'popular' you get messages from all round the world. A lot of women block delete an block the users from messaging them again. Maybe you two should sort a meet haha God no, I blocked him weeks ago For an opinion on a thread don't make out I tried to message you or anything because I wouldn't you're definitely not my type. Don’t try and put words in my mouth, I didn’t say you tried to message me. I don’t care if I’m not your type my lovely, because you are DEFINITELY not mine. I wouldn’t fuck you with someone else’s! Just ambiguous your last statement just making it clear and my sentiments are the same. " No, it wasn’t. I said I blocked you, which I did. I didn’t imply anything else | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages " Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day " And there’s the maths for you, Studley Moore. You can rest easy now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day " I love the specifics! Hahaha. The verdict is out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day " I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I love the specifics! Hahaha. The verdict is out. " He will still come back with some “yeah, but...” argument. This is turning into some sort of bizarre willy waving contest | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners." You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I love the specifics! Hahaha. The verdict is out. He will still come back with some “yeah, but...” argument. This is turning into some sort of bizarre willy waving contest " It’s bit embarrassing really! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now." Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. " We really need gifs on the forum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum" Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile." Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have." Well you must like wasting time then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have. Well you must like wasting time then" Reading someone’s profile is wasting time now? I like reading profiles to see how people express themselves. I don’t consider that wasting time, and I’m sure there are many women the same as me too. Don’t assume all women use this site in the way you think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile." I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day " At last we have a lovely gent who is mathematically minded, thank you sir. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have. Well you must like wasting time then Reading someone’s profile is wasting time now? I like reading profiles to see how people express themselves. I don’t consider that wasting time, and I’m sure there are many women the same as me too. Don’t assume all women use this site in the way you think. " Oh Chanelle, he’s just getting aggressive because this really didn’t go the way he expected at all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Turning into abit of a trolling post this haha " I was thinking the same | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have. Well you must like wasting time then Reading someone’s profile is wasting time now? I like reading profiles to see how people express themselves. I don’t consider that wasting time, and I’m sure there are many women the same as me too. Don’t assume all women use this site in the way you think. Oh Chanelle, he’s just getting aggressive because this really didn’t go the way he expected at all" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant " no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. " No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have. Well you must like wasting time then" Then people who don't read profiles are wasting their time messaging surely? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have. Well you must like wasting time then Reading someone’s profile is wasting time now? I like reading profiles to see how people express themselves. I don’t consider that wasting time, and I’m sure there are many women the same as me too. Don’t assume all women use this site in the way you think. " I would say it is if you aren't attracted to them and have no intention of meeting them yes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. Not all women just look at photos. I look through the whole profile, including their stats and any verifications they have. Well you must like wasting time then Reading someone’s profile is wasting time now? I like reading profiles to see how people express themselves. I don’t consider that wasting time, and I’m sure there are many women the same as me too. Don’t assume all women use this site in the way you think. I would say it is if you aren't attracted to them and have no intention of meeting them yes." Well that’s you. It certainly isn’t time wasting for me. And I’ll continue to do so. Attraction isn’t just physically for me, and reading someone’s profile could easily make me change my mind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour." no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. " So almost read this thread and ignored, but remembered that I’m lovely, so just so you’re aware, OP - I’m not interested in this thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here." If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant." There was a gentleman who did the maths on an earlier post. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant." I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day " And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick " Where did she call you thick? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone " But you're on hot pics surely you need a P.A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone But you're on hot pics surely you need a P.A " Am I?! And nah, I get hardly any messages. My comment was sarcastic, I’m in a very quiet area, but when I was in London a few months back I had over 200 messages in two hours. Awful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone But you're on hot pics surely you need a P.A Am I?! And nah, I get hardly any messages. My comment was sarcastic, I’m in a very quiet area, but when I was in London a few months back I had over 200 messages in two hours. Awful " Glad I moved to Cornwall then lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone But you're on hot pics surely you need a P.A Am I?! And nah, I get hardly any messages. My comment was sarcastic, I’m in a very quiet area, but when I was in London a few months back I had over 200 messages in two hours. Awful Glad I moved to Cornwall then lol" That was with filters on glad I don’t live there, I’m happy with my ten a day I did just bulk delete them - how could anyone keep up?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone But you're on hot pics surely you need a P.A Am I?! And nah, I get hardly any messages. My comment was sarcastic, I’m in a very quiet area, but when I was in London a few months back I had over 200 messages in two hours. Awful Glad I moved to Cornwall then lol That was with filters on glad I don’t live there, I’m happy with my ten a day I did just bulk delete them - how could anyone keep up?!" Same as having a new profile on here, you can't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone But you're on hot pics surely you need a P.A Am I?! And nah, I get hardly any messages. My comment was sarcastic, I’m in a very quiet area, but when I was in London a few months back I had over 200 messages in two hours. Awful " yes you are, It's OK I was being sarcastic too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick Where did she call you thick? " I did, earlier on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you have to verify yourself quickly as a new lady member to be able to message back." Well that's a lie women can reply to messages as soon as the join I have to ask that and your other comments on being able to sort out 200 messages in 20-30 mins (100 an hour I've timed it well 100 im 58mins unless you just delete all) you really need a reality check but I guess only a beta male would come up with such tosh. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you have to verify yourself quickly as a new lady member to be able to message back. Well that's a lie women can reply to messages as soon as the join I have to ask that and your other comments on being able to sort out 200 messages in 20-30 mins (100 an hour I've timed it well 100 im 58mins unless you just delete all) you really need a reality check but I guess only a beta male would come up with such tosh. " He’s changed his story since he posted that comment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day And I think that is entirely do-able and we should all be replying to everyone But you're on hot pics surely you need a P.A Am I?! And nah, I get hardly any messages. My comment was sarcastic, I’m in a very quiet area, but when I was in London a few months back I had over 200 messages in two hours. Awful " I live and London and hiding my profile for a bit was the best move ever. I can now focus on the decent ones I’ve gotten to know better. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you have to verify yourself quickly as a new lady member to be able to message back. Well that's a lie women can reply to messages as soon as the join I have to ask that and your other comments on being able to sort out 200 messages in 20-30 mins (100 an hour I've timed it well 100 im 58mins unless you just delete all) you really need a reality check but I guess only a beta male would come up with such tosh. " Them beta males eh? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour?" I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. " Back pedalling. Lying. Deflecting. The full set in one post | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. " Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"you have to verify yourself quickly as a new lady member to be able to message back. Well that's a lie women can reply to messages as soon as the join I have to ask that and your other comments on being able to sort out 200 messages in 20-30 mins (100 an hour I've timed it well 100 im 58mins unless you just delete all) you really need a reality check but I guess only a beta male would come up with such tosh. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! " An alpha male would be out shagging “babes”, since they’re called alphas because they have first access to resources, including sex | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I read threads from single guys pretty regularly that ask why don't folk reply etc.. Easy solution guys stop fucking looking at your sent items it serves zero purpose.. use that time more productively searching and messaging other folk. It's really not rocket science. Concentrate on your inbox it's the really important one. I read threads regularly from couple's and single ladies complaining of the inappropriate messages they receive often from guys.. I offer a simple solution to them.. block those genders account message filters apply appropriately.. On the single guy threads the analogy of you don't reply to junk mail is often cited.. in the real world it'd be pretty difficult to do without a mailbox ..on fab the site provides the tools to 'board' up your mailbox.. to the ladies and couple's if you don't use them be prepared for some 'junk' mail just like the real world. " I use the forums a lot, I have a running thread that I speak to people on and off of. Why should I block men? That would mean the people on the thread can't message me to ask advice about running or to ask to go to a social. Your way does not work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! " it's pedantic Alpha male does what he wants | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! " Damn, I usually prefer a sensitive beta male | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" it's pedantic Alpha male does what he wants" Can I become an alpha male? Do I need to have a penis? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! " It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" it's pedantic Alpha male does what he wants Can I become an alpha male? Do I need to have a penis?" With current political correctness rules, just shout it's unfair and I'm sure there'll be a movement created allowing you to become an alpha male regardless of having male organs or not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! it's pedantic Alpha male does what he wants" Ahh well you best do as you are told and keep replying to people on this thread then! As a side note you seem to a lot about running a female profile you really do! And on fab we also seem to have a lot of fake female profiles a lot of guys say so on a regular basis. Thirdly my maths goes 2 + 2 = Hmmmmmmmm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" it's pedantic Alpha male does what he wants Can I become an alpha male? Do I need to have a penis?" No but you still have to have some dignity and self respect which thanking for a rejection message is lacking in both. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! it's pedantic Alpha male does what he wants" Bare with, my missus is just doing me up the ass with her massive strap on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. " They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems." It’s nothing to do with egos. I, and several others, pulled you up because you were lying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! it's pedantic Alpha male does what he wants" How would you know? You aren't one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems." Nah you just lied about something and several people called you out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems. Nah you just lied about something and several people called you out. " Exactly. If anything, Mr Blonde, it’s your ego that has been bruised. How dare we argue with you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems. It’s nothing to do with egos. I, and several others, pulled you up because you were lying" how did I lie if you an others misinterpreted me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems. It’s nothing to do with egos. I, and several others, pulled you up because you were lying how did I lie if you an others misinterpreted me " So every single person who commented on what you said has misinterpreted you? Somehow I don’t think so. When everyone is saying something different to you, it’s time to look at yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems." Nope. Merely finishing what you have started would be my best guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know you women get so many messages that it's hard to keep on top of. I just want to say I appreciate the lovely women who message back and say if they aren't interested, rather than read and ignore. I've got news for you as well, a lot of the women don't get loads of messages they just say that posturing. So when they take 10 seconds to reply it isn't a big deal. Well how many messages do you get then? I met a single lady on here who was popular and used to get nearly 200 a day. Said it took about 20-30 minutes to sort out. There is no woman on here that needs a P.A. for messages Answering 200 messages in 20-30 minutes averages out at about 6 to 8 seconds per message, to read it, read the profile, check out the pictures and reply. Either the woman in question didn't bother looking at the message in its entirety and replied with a cut & paste message or she's bullshitting you. I'd bet on the letter, but would wager even more money that she doesn't get even close to 200 messages a day I never said she replied to every message, obviously block deleted a few an you don't need to open them to read 1 liners. You implied it by saying she “sorted them out”. So what was she doing to sort them out then? Don’t try and back pedal now. Yeah sort out doesn't mean reply to everyone as shown on here lots of women don't reply it is meant to be taken as a no. We really need gifs on the forum Show me where I said reply to everyone. I said it takes about 10 seconds to reply because a woman will just look at photos first same as everyone and can be an instant rejection. An men send them in a message, wouldn't even need to look at their profile. I quite clearly said “you implied it” and went on to explain what that meant no I didn't imply it at all you interpreted it that way. No.... reread your post. You implied that she replied to 200 messages in half an hour. no I said sorted them out, that can be bulk delete etc you are taking that as in replied to everyone. No woman replies to everyone on here. If that’s what you meant then why even bother to add your comment, which is completely out of context? On a thread thanking women for replying, women saying they don’t have enough time to reply to everyone and you saying your friend “sorts” messages in half an hour. You even asked to see the maths. Stop back pedalling! You know exactly what you meant. I added my comment because the guy shouldn't be thanking a woman for a rejection message in the first place. Lady probably seen a pic in his message an instantly rejected him. If that was the case it would take about 10 seconds to say no thanks which I don't think is far from being accurate and isn't a big deal. You misinterpreted a lot of what I have said and you calling me thick I haven’t misinterpreted anything, you are back pedalling because you know you were talking rubbish. And I did call you thick, because you were acting thick to try and keep up your bullshit before Fireman Sham showed up when you conveniently changed your tune! I have over a thousand messages right now. Using your logic, I could “sort” them in 3 seconds. Why did it take your mate half an hour? I don't need to back pedal because you misinterpreted. I didn't change my tune just surprised you thought I meant reply to everyone. Maybe you should be more shrewd at using the site then. Is this how a alpha male spends his Sunday evenings, being perdantic, arguing with women about messages, seems like something a beta male would do ?! It is. Only a bona fide beta male will pick fights with women. They have picked them with me because I have bruised their egos it seems. It’s nothing to do with egos. I, and several others, pulled you up because you were lying how did I lie if you an others misinterpreted me " Your ego won’t let you admit that you know you were lying, will it? Sad, really. At least we all saw it for what it was, despite your desperate and frankly ridiculous attempts to say otherwise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I read threads from single guys pretty regularly that ask why don't folk reply etc.. Easy solution guys stop fucking looking at your sent items it serves zero purpose.. use that time more productively searching and messaging other folk. It's really not rocket science. Concentrate on your inbox it's the really important one. I read threads regularly from couple's and single ladies complaining of the inappropriate messages they receive often from guys.. I offer a simple solution to them.. block those genders account message filters apply appropriately.. On the single guy threads the analogy of you don't reply to junk mail is often cited.. in the real world it'd be pretty difficult to do without a mailbox ..on fab the site provides the tools to 'board' up your mailbox.. to the ladies and couple's if you don't use them be prepared for some 'junk' mail just like the real world. I use the forums a lot, I have a running thread that I speak to people on and off of. Why should I block men? That would mean the people on the thread can't message me to ask advice about running or to ask to go to a social. Your way does not work." If the messages I received caused me enough headaches to complain Id do something different. I could Complain about it ..cos that'll fix the problem Those that complain of inappropriate messages have two choices 1. Change nothing and accept some junk mail(I said it up there as well) in your example folk could post on your thread and you can still message others to negate that block or filter. 2. Change something ..thlen they'd have far less to complain about. Choice is there's.use the tools or don't no skin off of my nose. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |