"It’s becoming an obsession 24 out of 100 this morning."
Haha I just checked again too. 46 out of 100 are unverified this morning. Must be the "just came home from the pub" effect because most are from the early hours of the morning
(For anyone who is wondering we don't need to check everyone's profile to see if they are verified - they have the green tick beside their name on the list!) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icentious OP Couple
over a year ago
Up on them there hills |
"It’s becoming an obsession 24 out of 100 this morning.
Haha I just checked again too. 46 out of 100 are unverified this morning. Must be the "just came home from the pub" effect because most are from the early hours of the morning
(For anyone who is wondering we don't need to check everyone's profile to see if they are verified - they have the green tick beside their name on the list!)" the green tick is photo verified, the green flag is a meeting/cam verification |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It’s becoming an obsession 24 out of 100 this morning.
Haha I just checked again too. 46 out of 100 are unverified this morning. Must be the "just came home from the pub" effect because most are from the early hours of the morning
(For anyone who is wondering we don't need to check everyone's profile to see if they are verified - they have the green tick beside their name on the list!)the green tick is photo verified, the green flag is a meeting/cam verification "
It's the opposite way around |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Other stats from the list this morning show 25 are site supporters, 54 are outside my age range and 49 have no profile avatar picture.
Definitely the "just left the pub" crowd lol.
Thank goodness for message filters |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icentious OP Couple
over a year ago
Up on them there hills |
"It’s becoming an obsession 24 out of 100 this morning.
Haha I just checked again too. 46 out of 100 are unverified this morning. Must be the "just came home from the pub" effect because most are from the early hours of the morning
(For anyone who is wondering we don't need to check everyone's profile to see if they are verified - they have the green tick beside their name on the list!)the green tick is photo verified, the green flag is a meeting/cam verification
It's the opposite way around "
Ah, then things ain’t that bad, thank you, faith restored.
Dare not look now |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Only 10 of the last 100 that have looked at our profile have been verified.
Is that the one in ten realist to fantasist mix on the site?
" omg sacre bleu how can we help those poor unfortunate unverified people |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icentious OP Couple
over a year ago
Up on them there hills |
"Only 10 of the last 100 that have looked at our profile have been verified.
Is that the one in ten realist to fantasist mix on the site?
omg sacre bleu how can we help those poor unfortunate unverified people "
Put more photos up for them to wank over??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Only 10 of the last 100 that have looked at our profile have been verified.
Is that the one in ten realist to fantasist mix on the site?
omg sacre bleu how can we help those poor unfortunate unverified people
Put more photos up for them to wank over??? " Ha hey true but put them in friends only frustrate the little penis players |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
28 verified out of 100.
I’ve had a run of let downs recently, most were non verified. Sadly it’s a no from me for non verified men from now on. Makes it difficult for the genuine men amongst them I know, but I’m fed up with time wasters.
There are some truly lovely men on here, I’ll dave my time for them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"28 verified out of 100.
I’ve had a run of let downs recently, most were non verified. Sadly it’s a no from me for non verified men from now on. Makes it difficult for the genuine men amongst them I know, but I’m fed up with time wasters.
There are some truly lovely men on here, I’ll dave my time for them " Make that 29 now. lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"28 verified out of 100.
I’ve had a run of let downs recently, most were non verified. Sadly it’s a no from me for non verified men from now on. Makes it difficult for the genuine men amongst them I know, but I’m fed up with time wasters.
There are some truly lovely men on here, I’ll dave my time for them Make that 29 now. lol"
Oh yes 29, the odds are improving |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"28 verified out of 100.
I’ve had a run of let downs recently, most were non verified. Sadly it’s a no from me for non verified men from now on. Makes it difficult for the genuine men amongst them I know, but I’m fed up with time wasters.
There are some truly lovely men on here, I’ll dave my time for them Make that 29 now. lol
Oh yes 29, the odds are improving "
30 x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
An unverified male is not necessarily a time waster, just not been lucky yet
I'd be more likely to say an unverified female, if she's been on here more than a few months, is either fake or a time waster, given the ratio of men to women |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *reykiwi500Man
over a year ago
West Kent (near Tonbridge) |
"An unverified male is not necessarily a time waster, just not been lucky yet
I'd be more likely to say an unverified female, if she's been on here more than a few months, is either fake or a time waster, given the ratio of men to women"
A good point. I haven't read through all the comments on this post, so I'm not sure if the OP is counting just photo-verified as 'verified' or whether it has to be cam/meet verified.
If the former, that is very quick and easy for everyone. Without wanting to go on a tangent here, in my view there should be no excuses for anyone not to be photo-verified within a week of joining. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"An unverified male is not necessarily a time waster, just not been lucky yet
I'd be more likely to say an unverified female, if she's been on here more than a few months, is either fake or a time waster, given the ratio of men to women"
Agreed! But most of the timewasting ive experienced recently has been unverified males. It is unfair on the unlucky men who are new here, but like many ladies I’ve decided not to meet non verified men |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago
ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL |
"An unverified male is not necessarily a time waster, just not been lucky yet
I'd be more likely to say an unverified female, if she's been on here more than a few months, is either fake or a time waster, given the ratio of men to women
Agreed! But most of the timewasting ive experienced recently has been unverified males. It is unfair on the unlucky men who are new here, but like many ladies I’ve decided not to meet non verified men "
I've decided to give up meeting new people and stick with established friends. I sometimes meet new people through them at parties etc. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icentious OP Couple
over a year ago
Up on them there hills |
"Have you really clicked on 100 profiles to find out. Thats dedication
or too much time on their hands lol "
No, it’s simple... look on the last 100 who have viewed your profile and look for green ticks.
Simple I said |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Probably the verified ones are in stealth mode lol
I always thought that you should list the number who have looked in ninja mode.,. As a tease, then that’s me."
That would be an interesting number to know and to see if it would be more or less than you were expecting |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icentious OP Couple
over a year ago
Up on them there hills |
"Probably the verified ones are in stealth mode lol
I always thought that you should list the number who have looked in ninja mode.,. As a tease, then that’s me.
That would be an interesting number to know and to see if it would be more or less than you were expecting "
But the tease would be stunning, even if it was only one.
Where would the mind go... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic