Seen a few posts recently where people have been let down on meets by women. In every case, others have concluded it was never a woman in the first place.
Do people really think it’s own men that can act badly  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 it's a convenient reason.
I think quite a few women enjoy stringing guys along. It's power exercised with few consequences.
There are usually subtle differences in the way women write that give the game away but not always. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" it's a convenient reason.
I think quite a few women enjoy stringing guys along. It's power exercised with few consequences.
There are usually subtle differences in the way women write that give the game away but not always."
Yeah I’m not good enough to distinguish to be fair. But one time some years ago I thought I’d test a “woman” by asking to talk on the phone to her. It was indeed a woman. A troublesome one at that. Her thing was to go behind my back with my husband and then go behind his back with me. Erm, no thanks!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" it's a convenient reason.
I think quite a few women enjoy stringing guys along. It's power exercised with few consequences.
There are usually subtle differences in the way women write that give the game away but not always.
Yeah I’m not good enough to distinguish to be fair. But one time some years ago I thought I’d test a “woman” by asking to talk on the phone to her. It was indeed a woman. A troublesome one at that. Her thing was to go behind my back with my husband and then go behind his back with me. Erm, no thanks!
"
That's a lot of going behind backs. She'd eventually meet herself coming the other way   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If they are unverified profiles I'm inclined to think it's a man wanting something to wank over.
Of course, there could be women just wanting the thrill of being chatted up, or people who get a kick out of sending people on wild goose chases. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If they are unverified profiles I'm inclined to think it's a man wanting something to wank over.
Of course, there could be women just wanting the thrill of being chatted up, or people who get a kick out of sending people on wild goose chases."
For example, the the thread the other day when the woman was meeting another woman and then went UNLOS. I’m sure I’d looked at the OPs profile and it was verified. Oh well never know now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If they are unverified profiles I'm inclined to think it's a man wanting something to wank over.
Of course, there could be women just wanting the thrill of being chatted up, or people who get a kick out of sending people on wild goose chases.
For example, the the thread the other day when the woman was meeting another woman and then went UNLOS. I’m sure I’d looked at the OPs profile and it was verified. Oh well never know now. "
I often wonder to myself what motivates people.
I liken some behaviour to kids playing knock on the door and run away. Most of us grow out of that but some continue to get pleasure from getting people to do something under false presences. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" it's a convenient reason.
I think quite a few women enjoy stringing guys along. It's power exercised with few consequences.
There are usually subtle differences in the way women write that give the game away but not always.
Yeah I’m not good enough to distinguish to be fair. But one time some years ago I thought I’d test a “woman” by asking to talk on the phone to her. It was indeed a woman. A troublesome one at that. Her thing was to go behind my back with my husband and then go behind his back with me. Erm, no thanks!
"
But wouldn't everyone know everything anyway,she told you what she wanted so it wouldn't be going behind your back or am I missing something  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If they are unverified profiles I'm inclined to think it's a man wanting something to wank over.
Of course, there could be women just wanting the thrill of being chatted up, or people who get a kick out of sending people on wild goose chases.
For example, the the thread the other day when the woman was meeting another woman and then went UNLOS. I’m sure I’d looked at the OPs profile and it was verified. Oh well never know now.
I often wonder to myself what motivates people.
I liken some behaviour to kids playing knock on the door and run away. Most of us grow out of that but some continue to get pleasure from getting people to do something under false presences."
They crave Attention I suppose and while they’re chatting on here they’re the centre of it.As I said in another thread we’ve all fallen for it when we first started on here as newbies but after a bit you almost develop a second sense a spot them pretty quickly.Also the fact I’ve put in my profile that I will only do socials in clubs puts them off |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" it's a convenient reason.
I think quite a few women enjoy stringing guys along. It's power exercised with few consequences.
There are usually subtle differences in the way women write that give the game away but not always.
Yeah I’m not good enough to distinguish to be fair. But one time some years ago I thought I’d test a “woman” by asking to talk on the phone to her. It was indeed a woman. A troublesome one at that. Her thing was to go behind my back with my husband and then go behind his back with me. Erm, no thanks!
But wouldn't everyone know everything anyway,she told you what she wanted so it wouldn't be going behind your back or am I missing something "
She clearly got off on the cheating thing. Like she’d keep contriving situations to come between us. Not my thing though, so that was the end of that ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" it's a convenient reason.
I think quite a few women enjoy stringing guys along. It's power exercised with few consequences.
There are usually subtle differences in the way women write that give the game away but not always.
Yeah I’m not good enough to distinguish to be fair. But one time some years ago I thought I’d test a “woman” by asking to talk on the phone to her. It was indeed a woman. A troublesome one at that. Her thing was to go behind my back with my husband and then go behind his back with me. Erm, no thanks!
But wouldn't everyone know everything anyway,she told you what she wanted so it wouldn't be going behind your back or am I missing something
She clearly got off on the cheating thing. Like she’d keep contriving situations to come between us. Not my thing though, so that was the end of that !"
Sound's a bit like hard work doesn't it,I like things simple myself. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
