 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
A little background. I live in a block of flats, we have a video phone door entry system from street level.
Within the block I have a neighbour with benefits we both enjoy an independent life while having some fun when the mood takes us.
Yesterday lunch time my neighbour pings a message "fancy some afternoon delight" of course I replied "you bet I do". "Great be up in 10 minutes" was the response.
Just time for me to get a quick shower, set the shower running and stripped of already semi hard with thoughts of what the delights the afternoon might have instore.
With the same tap tap on the door rushed and flung it open saying something along the lines of "christ you're keen are your knickers on fire or what".
Stood in front of me were three smartly dressed women and a bloke in a suit grasping a bible and some leaflets.
Seeing my nakedness and arousal one of the ladies let out a little scream and dived back around the corner, the other two stood their ground with smiles on their faces.
The bloke clearly annoyed pushed in front of the two women and started verbally abusing me, accusing me of public indecency and he was going to call the police, with that they left, the two ladies still giggling. I should add that my door is not visible to other flats. When my NWB did arrive we had a fantastic afternoon speculating on how the situation might have developed differently.
What do you think was it public indecency? After all the god squad arrived at my door unannounced.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think public decency was outraged.
I think that's the case whenever somebody propagates a myth as fact, especially when doing so in an unsolicited manner. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don't know about public decency being offended but it's certainly the most hilarious post on here for a long while. I wouldn't worry too much about them trying to make something of it, if they did they wouldn't be likely to get very far. XXX |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A little background. I live in a block of flats, we have a video phone door entry system from street level.
Within the block I have a neighbour with benefits we both enjoy an independent life while having some fun when the mood takes us.
Yesterday lunch time my neighbour pings a message "fancy some afternoon delight" of course I replied "you bet I do". "Great be up in 10 minutes" was the response.
Just time for me to get a quick shower, set the shower running and stripped of already semi hard with thoughts of what the delights the afternoon might have instore.
With the same tap tap on the door rushed and flung it open saying something along the lines of "christ you're keen are your knickers on fire or what".
Stood in front of me were three smartly dressed women and a bloke in a suit grasping a bible and some leaflets.
Seeing my nakedness and arousal one of the ladies let out a little scream and dived back around the corner, the other two stood their ground with smiles on their faces.
The bloke clearly annoyed pushed in front of the two women and started verbally abusing me, accusing me of public indecency and he was going to call the police, with that they left, the two ladies still giggling. I should add that my door is not visible to other flats. When my NWB did arrive we had a fantastic afternoon speculating on how the situation might have developed differently.
What do you think was it public indecency? After all the god squad arrived at my door unannounced.
"
No its not public indecency and they took the risk in knocking your door (cold calling)
least you might not have to see the god squad again  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported. "
You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...
As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.
You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...
As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence. "
Sounds like you've had this problem before?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *imbo59seMan
over a year ago
North Norfolk area |
As a youngster I had a JH as a boss, hypocritical b*stard!
My blood doning (rare group) was always a cause for "discussion"!
He sent some of his mob around on a Saturday morning, the looks on their faces when my "guest" strolled down the stairs behind me.....boobs and pubes rustling in the wind...priceless |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"If the ladies were impressed they might come back and knock again  "
That was the basis of our fantasies for the afternoon. Alas did not come to pass. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.
You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...
As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.
Sounds like you've had this problem before? "
Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.
You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...
As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.
Sounds like you've had this problem before?
Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer! "
There must be crimes against swinging happening every 5 mins on here, thank god you’re here  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.
You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...
As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.
Sounds like you've had this problem before?
Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer! "
Do you get asked to show your briefs a lot on here? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *.1079Man
over a year ago
Lincolnshire |
Ive answered the door loads of times to the bible bashers in my dressing gown stlightly open, always got a smile but they tend to not try and stop to bother me. Once I kept them there for ages to give them a taste of their own medicine. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Of course it wasn't, you were in your home where you have "a reasonable expectation of privacy". The police would laugh at him if it was reported.
You're right but for the wrong reason. If the OP had known it was the God squad at the door and intentionally exposed his Penis to them intending to cause alarm or distress he would be guilty of exposure contrary to s66 of the sexual offences act 2003. The fact that they knocked on his door is immaterial. I mean I don't think Mr paedo would have much of a defence on the grounds of privacy if he answers the door naked to kids trick or treating...
As it was, he thought it was his fb at the door, so he didn't have the necessary intent for the offence.
Sounds like you've had this problem before?
Nope, I'm a criminal lawyer!
Do you get asked to show your briefs a lot on here? "
The old ones are the best...
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Should have wanked into your hand and seagulled them 
Not an expression I’ve heard before. Is it what I think 
It's basically a vertical version of when you spiderman them"
Yeah, think hotel balconies and Status Quo. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
