FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Tinder
Tinder
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Could be due to the male to female ratio on this site compared to Tinder.
Men outnumber women, so the ladies have far greater options and pick and choose who they want to meet. Men can as well but to a lesser degree.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aterjetWoman
over a year ago
South West |
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet... "
Retards?
In this day and age you are using that word.
Shame on you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aelawMan
over a year ago
Paisley |
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet...
Retards?
In this day and age you are using that word.
Shame on you."
Never even picked that up  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Of course it's easier for a single guy to get sex on a dating site! On dating sites there are more even numbers of men versus women all predominantly looking to meet the opposite sex. Whereas on swinging sites there are ridiculous numbers of single men, minimal numbers of single women, and the rest predominantly being couples a lot of which won't even be looking for single men.
Mrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet...
Retards?
In this day and age you are using that word.
Shame on you."
Sorry, mum! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Could be due to the male to female ratio on this site compared to Tinder.
Men outnumber women, so the ladies have far greater options and pick and choose who they want to meet. Men can as well but to a lesser degree.
"
I disagree with this point
The "numbers" game is false, it's the I'll meet men who I couldn't get on tinder women and couples ... Or the aggressive judgemental people who won't explore out of the tiny (yet insignificant) pool of specific requirements they have or think they have but call themselves swinger's or sexually open minded |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Could be due to the male to female ratio on this site compared to Tinder.
Men outnumber women, so the ladies have far greater options and pick and choose who they want to meet. Men can as well but to a lesser degree.
I disagree with this point
The "numbers" game is false, it's the I'll meet men who I couldn't get on tinder women and couples ... Or the aggressive judgemental people who won't explore out of the tiny (yet insignificant) pool of specific requirements they have or think they have but call themselves swinger's or sexually open minded"
Well there must be a reason why Fab attracts these type of people and Tinder doesn't? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Well there must be a reason why Fab attracts these type of people and Tinder doesn't? "
You can't hide on tinder
But you can sit and LIE behind a persona in Fab |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Well there must be a reason why Fab attracts these type of people and Tinder doesn't?
You can't hide on tinder
But you can sit and LIE behind a persona in Fab"
Yes that could well be true. But Tinder, being a singles site, is of absalutely no use to couples or single men wanting to play with a couple. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Insulting the very group that you want to meet won't help you I'm afraid. Plus that word is disgusting!
Anyways, most ladies here want something more then tinder sex. Maybe your not offering a fab experience.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet... "
Tinder and fab are designed for different audiences.
Tinder is a hook up site which takes the standard dating site and shortcuts to sex.
Fab is a swinging site, which means it has many couples as swinging emerged from what was in the past the old wife swapping experience. So it attracts a fair amount of couples looking for couples, lots of people looking for ffm threesomes. There is of course room for single men, but the supply far outweighs the number of people look for them.
A bit like tens of 1000s of jazz fans turning up to a Leeds festival, sure there maybe the odd artist playing a bit of jazz, but they are going to struggle to get a view of them when the bigger areas have been handed to rock bands. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple
over a year ago
Brighton |
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet...
Tinder and fab are designed for different audiences.
Tinder is a hook up site which takes the standard dating site and shortcuts to sex.
Fab is a swinging site, which means it has many couples as swinging emerged from what was in the past the old wife swapping experience. So it attracts a fair amount of couples looking for couples, lots of people looking for ffm threesomes. There is of course room for single men, but the supply far outweighs the number of people look for them.
A bit like tens of 1000s of jazz fans turning up to a Leeds festival, sure there maybe the odd artist playing a bit of jazz, but they are going to struggle to get a view of them when the bigger areas have been handed to rock bands. "
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
While there are people on here looking for 1-2-1 sex (and couples who have fantasies of one of them meeting someone alone) for the most part swinging is about three or more people together (or couples swapping for separate room but technically that is still four people).
I doubt very much you could organise many threesomes, foursomes, orgies or gangbangs through Tinder (I may be wrong). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head."
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging"
Most of the couples on Fab are here for swinging. Don't know about the single ladies, but they are a very small proportion of Fab population anyway. I would imagine that 99% of the single guys here are not interested in swinging, and because single guys are the biggest demographic, that makes a high proportion of Fab having nothing to do with swinging. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging"
Maybe that's 99% of the singles on here. Those of us in the 1% have a fabulous time |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think for me Tinder is more for kids. Here you get real men who do the real job.
Tinder is for lazy boys.
Here you need to put in effort.
Hmmmm. Effort..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging
Maybe that's 99% of the singles on here. Those of us in the 1% have a fabulous time "
Does this make HIM the R word?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otgirl32Woman
over a year ago
Ashton Under Lyne |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head."
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ???? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ????"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ????"
True, but if swinging is casual sex, then that makes Tinder a swinging site that specialises in 1-2-1 hookups? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging"
The word swinging has a broad spectrum though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otgirl32Woman
over a year ago
Ashton Under Lyne |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ????
True, but if swinging is casual sex, then that makes Tinder a swinging site that specialises in 1-2-1 hookups? "
Not used Tinder so can't say but if people are meeting for casual sex then it's a swinging site sure. If a couple has a profile and meets other couples it's a swinging foursome having casual sex. If a single bloke connects with a single girl it's a swinging twosome having casual sex. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple
over a year ago
Brighton |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging"
Agree with you that many MANY people on Fab are not swingers. I would guess that a lot of the "singles" are in fact after casual sex rather than swinging. Not so the couples who by the definition of being a couple and wanting others to join them makes them couples!
Yes there are dreamers, wankers (Ie they get a kick from "talking" to real swingers but have not got the bottle to do it themselves) teasers (who lead people on with no intention of ever meeting) and fakes (oh so many fakes) and complete weirdos on here. But there are also some very genuine lovely gorgeous amazing people too!
However, the clue is in the name. FAbSWINGERS was set up to allow swingers to connect.
However, loads of non swingers have jumped on the bandwagon in the hope of getting an easy (casual) shag... Sometimes they do but most of them have missed the point and don't understand swinging as a concept! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet...
Retards?
In this day and age you are using that word.
Shame on you."
disgrace |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Of course it's easier for a single guy to get sex on a dating site! On dating sites there are more even numbers of men versus women all predominantly looking to meet the opposite sex. Whereas on swinging sites there are ridiculous numbers of single men, minimal numbers of single women, and the rest predominantly being couples a lot of which won't even be looking for single men.
Mrs"
Very true, though on here as a single woman I've not really found a guy or girl that is close enough and my cup of tea... does tinder have a bisexual section?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging
Agree with you that many MANY people on Fab are not swingers. I would guess that a lot of the "singles" are in fact after casual sex rather than swinging. Not so the couples who by the definition of being a couple and wanting others to join them makes them couples!
Yes there are dreamers, wankers (Ie they get a kick from "talking" to real swingers but have not got the bottle to do it themselves) teasers (who lead people on with no intention of ever meeting) and fakes (oh so many fakes) and complete weirdos on here. But there are also some very genuine lovely gorgeous amazing people too!
However, the clue is in the name. FAbSWINGERS was set up to allow swingers to connect.
However, loads of non swingers have jumped on the bandwagon in the hope of getting an easy (casual) shag... Sometimes they do but most of them have missed the point and don't understand swinging as a concept!"
I agree. To us this is a swingers site, and we love our single guys. But we only play with single guys who are swingers. I don't feel this site ceases to be a swinging site, just because non-swinging single guys coming here in droves on the basis that they think it should be easier to get a shag on a swingers site than on a dating site. Most people don't pay any attention to these opportunists.
Mrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple
over a year ago
Brighton |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ????"
I get where you are coming from and TBH labels are sometimes helpful and sometimes not. From what you say we use a different definition.
I guess if someone prefers 1 on 1 sex but secures the partner through the swinging club scene or party scene then I guess they could class themselves as a swinger (who are we to to disagree). You could stretch that swinger websites I guess?
For us our definition still stands. It is a group activity (that is more than two people) for us.
So by that rationale if YOU never partake in anything other than MF or FF then you are not a swinger in OUR books, you are looking for casual (but still adventurous) sex.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think for me Tinder is more for kids. Here you get real men who do the real job.
Tinder is for lazy boys.
Here you need to put in effort.
Hmmmm. Effort....."
It isn't that clear cut.
A lot of effort can be wasted here. As others said - different demographics, supply and demands etc... affect the outcomes.
What kind of effort do you have to put in if you were looking for penguins on the North Pole? None, of course. Just go somewhere where penguins live - say Antarctica. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ????"
In my definition, whether right or wrong, swinging is only when couples are involved. Single men/women sleeping around isn't swinging. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple
over a year ago
Brighton |
"I think for me Tinder is more for kids. Here you get real men who do the real job.
Tinder is for lazy boys.
Here you need to put in effort.
Hmmmm. Effort.....
It isn't that clear cut.
A lot of effort can be wasted here. As others said - different demographics, supply and demands etc... affect the outcomes.
What kind of effort do you have to put in if you were looking for penguins on the North Pole? None, of course. Just go somewhere where penguins live - say Antarctica."
Sorry but penguin sex fetishists are just plain wrong |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ????
I get where you are coming from and TBH labels are sometimes helpful and sometimes not. From what you say we use a different definition.
I guess if someone prefers 1 on 1 sex but secures the partner through the swinging club scene or party scene then I guess they could class themselves as a swinger (who are we to to disagree). You could stretch that swinger websites I guess?
For us our definition still stands. It is a group activity (that is more than two people) for us.
So by that rationale if YOU never partake in anything other than MF or FF then you are not a swinger in OUR books, you are looking for casual (but still adventurous) sex.
"
This is my understanding too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *otgirl32Woman
over a year ago
Ashton Under Lyne |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
Not sure I fully identify with the definition of swinging that was stated above. For me swinging = casual sex. For me it's usually 1:1 instead of groups or threesomes/foursomes although sometimes I'll do those too. I consider myself a swinger by all accounts. Also the so-called "swinger experience" also encompasses other things including a social interaction, sometimes even deeper relationships ('poly' sort of stuff) but at the core of things, swinging is still casual sex with others. Or am I offbase ????
I get where you are coming from and TBH labels are sometimes helpful and sometimes not. From what you say we use a different definition.
I guess if someone prefers 1 on 1 sex but secures the partner through the swinging club scene or party scene then I guess they could class themselves as a swinger (who are we to to disagree). You could stretch that swinger websites I guess?
For us our definition still stands. It is a group activity (that is more than two people) for us.
So by that rationale if YOU never partake in anything other than MF or FF then you are not a swinger in OUR books, you are looking for casual (but still adventurous) sex.
"
Fair enough, it's all about definitions and as you rightly said, labels are meaningless. We're all here to meet other individuals (couples, singles, both) and ultimately enjoy the experience of real or voyeuristic sex with a new or different person (some just watch. Lord knows I first started like that just watched a couple). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think for me Tinder is more for kids. Here you get real men who do the real job.
Tinder is for lazy boys.
Here you need to put in effort.
Hmmmm. Effort.....
It isn't that clear cut.
A lot of effort can be wasted here. As others said - different demographics, supply and demands etc... affect the outcomes.
What kind of effort do you have to put in if you were looking for penguins on the North Pole? None, of course. Just go somewhere where penguins live - say Antarctica.
Sorry but penguin sex fetishists are just plain wrong "
What about searching for polar bears ? It would be equally wrong if done in Sahara for example... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Got fuck all on tinder,met loving smelly mary last night off here and a loon,i give up.....get more attention off gay men then women on here(someone trying to tell me something) think i need to go the gym,cover me self it tattos and get a penis enlargement,might get more luck!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Insulting the very group that you want to meet won't help you I'm afraid. Plus that word is disgusting!
Anyways, most ladies here want something more then tinder sex. Maybe your not offering a fab experience. "
I'm offering a fab experience |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irldnCouple
over a year ago
Brighton |
"I think for me Tinder is more for kids. Here you get real men who do the real job.
Tinder is for lazy boys.
Here you need to put in effort.
Hmmmm. Effort.....
It isn't that clear cut.
A lot of effort can be wasted here. As others said - different demographics, supply and demands etc... affect the outcomes.
What kind of effort do you have to put in if you were looking for penguins on the North Pole? None, of course. Just go somewhere where penguins live - say Antarctica.
Sorry but penguin sex fetishists are just plain wrong
What about searching for polar bears ? It would be equally wrong if done in Sahara for example... "
Well I would say despite being totally wrong Penguin sex is a lot safe than Polar Bear sex. Talk about living dangerously!!!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Got fuck all on tinder,met loving smelly mary last night off here and a loon,i give up.....get more attention off gay men then women on here(someone trying to tell me something) think i need to go the gym,cover me self it tattos and get a penis enlargement,might get more luck!!!"
I would say go to the gum after Smelly mary . lol
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head."
Agree.
There are lots of singles who 'get' the concept of swinging and do well on here.
There are ones who don't really get it it, but still do ok, as people still will want to meet them, and it works in certain situations. A 1:1 meet is going to probably work, or a gb type situation possibly.
But, in general, if someone doesn't get the distinction between tinder and here, I'd guess they would struggle meeting couples for example, or other singles who do understand the scene better.
MrB |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd. "
Its not odd, it's the odds are not the same. There are less people looking for what you are offering than on tinder. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Its not odd, it's the odds are not the same. There are less people looking for what you are offering than on tinder. "
But that's what I do find odd. This is predominately a sex site. Tinder is a dating app. I'd of thought the ratios would be reversed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet...
Retards?
In this day and age you are using that word.
Shame on you."
to this, thought just the same!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd. "
Oh come on, there's no way you would get half the stuff your profile says you are looking for on Tinder - couples, threesomes, gang bangs, adult parties, swing clubs, swaps. The best Tinder will do is is get to a one-to-one meet with a lady and hopefully sex. Why would you even compare the 2 sites?
Mrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Its not odd, it's the odds are not the same. There are less people looking for what you are offering than on tinder.
But that's what I do find odd. This is predominately a sex site. Tinder is a dating app. I'd of thought the ratios would be reversed. "
Reversed ratios? You mean significantly more women than men?!? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Was on Tinder, probably still am, but never added it to my new phone.
I'd rather be on here.
Tinder profiles 'looking for my soulmate' 'ready to settle down with miss right'
Bollox!
Never met one that wasn't just looking for a shag.
At least here people are honest, upfront you have some security from Veris.
And I've ended up with some actual real friends!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Its not odd, it's the odds are not the same. There are less people looking for what you are offering than on tinder.
But that's what I do find odd. This is predominately a sex site. Tinder is a dating app. I'd of thought the ratios would be reversed. "
And that is the key point, you see it as a sex site. But if you use search you will see that the ratios are not as you assume.
I've done it before so can't be bothered again but put a limit on of 5 miles and look as man looking for women or looking for couples looking for men.
Then reverse that search and look as a couple or a woman.
The difference in numbers is massive. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Oh come on, there's no way you would get half the stuff your profile says you are looking for on Tinder - couples, threesomes, gang bangs, adult parties, swing clubs, swaps. The best Tinder will do is is get to a one-to-one meet with a lady and hopefully sex. Why would you even compare the 2 sites?
Mrs"
Oh please. This site offers you a tick box of 'likes' doesn't mean that's strictly what I'm looking for.
Tinder is just easier I find to connect, meet and have sex and I wouldn't of thought that. Simple as that really. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Its not odd, it's the odds are not the same. There are less people looking for what you are offering than on tinder.
But that's what I do find odd. This is predominately a sex site. Tinder is a dating app. I'd of thought the ratios would be reversed.
And that is the key point, you see it as a sex site. But if you use search you will see that the ratios are not as you assume.
I've done it before so can't be bothered again but put a limit on of 5 miles and look as man looking for women or looking for couples looking for men.
Then reverse that search and look as a couple or a woman.
The difference in numbers is massive. "
I think you've nailed it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Tinder is designed for sex hook ups. It was based on the very successful grinder.
This site has been around alot longer and whilst people say the definition of swinging has changed, I would say that if you went out on the street and asked 1000 random people what is swinging nearly all of them would say it's wife swapping. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Oh come on, there's no way you would get half the stuff your profile says you are looking for on Tinder - couples, threesomes, gang bangs, adult parties, swing clubs, swaps. The best Tinder will do is is get to a one-to-one meet with a lady and hopefully sex. Why would you even compare the 2 sites?
Mrs
Oh please. This site offers you a tick box of 'likes' doesn't mean that's strictly what I'm looking for.
Tinder is just easier I find to connect, meet and have sex and I wouldn't of thought that. Simple as that really. "
Begs the question...why are you hear and not just stick to Tinder if its that great/successful for you?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Oh come on, there's no way you would get half the stuff your profile says you are looking for on Tinder - couples, threesomes, gang bangs, adult parties, swing clubs, swaps. The best Tinder will do is is get to a one-to-one meet with a lady and hopefully sex. Why would you even compare the 2 sites?
Mrs
Oh please. This site offers you a tick box of 'likes' doesn't mean that's strictly what I'm looking for.
Tinder is just easier I find to connect, meet and have sex and I wouldn't of thought that. Simple as that really. "
Of course Tinder is easier to find meets and sex. I don't know why this is of surprise to anyone. As I said earlier in this thread there are lots of single women on Tinder, whereas on Fab there are relatively few single women. But those who are looking for other things such as threesomes and group sex, then Tinder is on little use. If it's just 1-2-1 sex that a man wants then he is more likely to find that on a site where there are more women. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Oh come on, there's no way you would get half the stuff your profile says you are looking for on Tinder - couples, threesomes, gang bangs, adult parties, swing clubs, swaps. The best Tinder will do is is get to a one-to-one meet with a lady and hopefully sex. Why would you even compare the 2 sites?
Mrs
Oh please. This site offers you a tick box of 'likes' doesn't mean that's strictly what I'm looking for.
Tinder is just easier I find to connect, meet and have sex and I wouldn't of thought that. Simple as that really.
Begs the question...why are you hear and not just stick to Tinder if its that great/successful for you? "
Good question. tbh I used to see too many people I knew on there & vice versa. Thought this would be a bit more discreet as no one I personally know (that I know of) use or know about this site. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd. "
I'm surprised they're not flocking to your door, with a username like that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Its not odd, it's the odds are not the same. There are less people looking for what you are offering than on tinder.
But that's what I do find odd. This is predominately a sex site. Tinder is a dating app. I'd of thought the ratios would be reversed.
And that is the key point, you see it as a sex site. But if you use search you will see that the ratios are not as you assume.
I've done it before so can't be bothered again but put a limit on of 5 miles and look as man looking for women or looking for couples looking for men.
Then reverse that search and look as a couple or a woman.
The difference in numbers is massive.
I think you've nailed it. "
I had a spare 5 minutes so ran the odds for a guy in Luton on another thread.
Without taking into account preferences.
There were 26 female accounts looking for men 2 years either side of his age within 5 miles.
There were over 300 men looking for women 2 years either side of that same age range within 5 miles.
Only 8 of those women have been active in the last 3 months. Only 3 of those are meeting verified.
Now people obviously travel outside of 5 miles and those specified age ranges. But that does not increase the odds as everyone does that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"same here on pof it's awesome "
Agree I joined POF cpl of months back and was inundated immdiately couldnt cope with it ha .So came back on here.......think I actually enjoy the challenge and doing the chasing . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Been on an off so many times it's not even funny. Seems to be a massive time suck, much worse than fab, and you've got no history or verifications and it's riddled with creeps who are cheating, can't speak English etc. OK yes the cheaters are here too but they're easier to spot. Lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tinder is a hook up site parading as a dating site "
Agree
My daughter who WAS seeking a long term relationship found guys only looking for casual shags. Or holes to fuck..To put it even more bluntly (her words) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Tinder is a hook up site parading as a dating site
Agree
My daughter who WAS seeking a long term relationship found guys only looking for casual shags. Or holes to fuck..To put it even more bluntly (her words)"
Not to mention numerous cheating married men. Mind you, fab is riddled with all of that too |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Its not odd, it's the odds are not the same. There are less people looking for what you are offering than on tinder.
But that's what I do find odd. This is predominately a sex site. Tinder is a dating app. I'd of thought the ratios would be reversed.
And that is the key point, you see it as a sex site. But if you use search you will see that the ratios are not as you assume.
I've done it before so can't be bothered again but put a limit on of 5 miles and look as man looking for women or looking for couples looking for men.
Then reverse that search and look as a couple or a woman.
The difference in numbers is massive.
I think you've nailed it.
I had a spare 5 minutes so ran the odds for a guy in Luton on another thread.
Without taking into account preferences.
There were 26 female accounts looking for men 2 years either side of his age within 5 miles.
There were over 300 men looking for women 2 years either side of that same age range within 5 miles.
Only 8 of those women have been active in the last 3 months. Only 3 of those are meeting verified.
Now people obviously travel outside of 5 miles and those specified age ranges. But that does not increase the odds as everyone does that. "
So that's about 100 men for every woman who is actively looking. Wow. Unless those men are interested in couples there doesn't seem much point. I mean no logical thinking man in a bar full of 300 men and only 3 women, would consider that a realistic situation for pulling in. Yet men come on Fab thinking it increases their chances of pulling!
Mrs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The problem for a male only is supply and demand. The actual amount of couples and females is much lower than males adding into this there is a lot of fakes profiles. Then the couples a good proportion of them aren't looking single males only. Then you go back to the first point of supply and demand couples or females can be a lot more selective in there choice of male partner. So it comes back to your on a niche site and the odds are not in your favour. Your attitude won't help and makes the block button look very inviting |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It's not rocket science really. If you're a single looking for a shag use Tinder or POF.
If you are single and into this wonderful alternative lifestyle and especially if you are into group sex and the social side of things then use Fab.
If you think Fab is a sex site more likely to lead to a shag you have 100% got it the wrong way round.
If you have misunderstood what Fab is about you are 100% wasting your time here.
I think that covers it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No but I have used fish and it was lame. Lots of women on there, but they all have kids and want relationships. And they are also on high alert with regards to men wanting one night stands. This site is almost perfect. Just need more women. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ieman300Man
over a year ago
Best Greggs in Cheshire East |
swinging
'sw????/Submit
adjectiveinformal
adjective: swinging
lively, exciting, and fashionable.
"a swinging resort"
sexually liberated or promiscuous.
One of many definitions on the net. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I use FAB- I meet singles and had a hell of a lot of fun and been in MMF and a party of two
I use Tinder- Met some very hot women, and from the our set we where on the same page to have fun, lved it.
I use POF- Again had some great play on there and made a few friends also
So I use all three
If I wonderful woman comes along that I want to settle down with, which ever site she is on that is great. Until then I am going to keep having sex and exploring myself
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think for me Tinder is more for kids. Here you get real men who do the real job.
Tinder is for lazy boys.
Here you need to put in effort.
Hmmmm. Effort....."
Still no luck! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *loppsyWoman
over a year ago
marlow |
"It's not rocket science really. If you're a single looking for a shag use Tinder or POF.
If you are single and into this wonderful alternative lifestyle and especially if you are into group sex and the social side of things then use Fab.
If you think Fab is a sex site more likely to lead to a shag you have 100% got it the wrong way round.
If you have misunderstood what Fab is about you are 100% wasting your time here.
I think that covers it."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Agree with OP. Tinder when I was on there had v regular chats and meets. On here it's virtually impossible haha. Maybe my profile is crap or I'm an ugly troll but same principles apply to tinder. It's odd.
Oh come on, there's no way you would get half the stuff your profile says you are looking for on Tinder - couples, threesomes, gang bangs, adult parties, swing clubs, swaps. The best Tinder will do is is get to a one-to-one meet with a lady and hopefully sex. Why would you even compare the 2 sites?
Mrs"
Tinder did have a 'social' function where 'groups' could advertise their night out and get others to join them. I Thought it sounded like gang r*pe waiting to happen (no veris, little profile text), but did open up the options for group 'fun'. Not sure if they kept the function. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's not rocket science really. If you're a single looking for a shag use Tinder or POF.
If you are single and into this wonderful alternative lifestyle and especially if you are into group sex and the social side of things then use Fab.
If you think Fab is a sex site more likely to lead to a shag you have 100% got it the wrong way round.
If you have misunderstood what Fab is about you are 100% wasting your time here.
I think that covers it."
Spot on my cheeky friend x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's not rocket science really. If you're a single looking for a shag use Tinder or POF.
If you are single and into this wonderful alternative lifestyle and especially if you are into group sex and the social side of things then use Fab.
If you think Fab is a sex site more likely to lead to a shag you have 100% got it the wrong way round.
If you have misunderstood what Fab is about you are 100% wasting your time here.
I think that covers it."
Spot on...  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago
Scotland - Aberdeen |
I always wonder 'why'
I mean, 'why, if you are so successful on Tinder, why are you still on here?'
I wouldn't hang around in a place if it was causing frustration where upon a different site met my needs more.
So 'why?' Can you answer me that?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Oh come on, there's no way you would get half the stuff your profile says you are looking for on Tinder - couples, threesomes, gang bangs, adult parties, swing clubs, swaps. The best Tinder will do is is get to a one-to-one meet with a lady and hopefully sex. Why would you even compare the 2 sites?
Mrs"
Not entirely true I'm afraid,there are more couples and lasses looking for swinger-type meets on Tinder than you think.They normally have a single lass profile,but make it clear they're a couple seeking men for threesomes or for hotwife/cuckold scenarios.There are also single lasses openly looking to meet with more than one man at a time or for men to enjoy swinger activities with,eg club visits.I know this because I have met with some of them granted there's nowhere near as many such profiles as here on Fab,but they do exist  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Nope, not on tinder.
2 reasons. Its based on facebook which I'm not on and find very depeessing.
It needs a photo....I don't do face pics"
You don't need Facebook to use Tinder,I detest Facebook so I have a throwaway Google+ account for using Tinder with.You also don't have to use a face pic, there's many a lass on Tinder with no face on show |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
The simple fact that the OP asks the question shows a lack of understanding about swinging vs casual sex.
That just about hits the nail on the head.
99% of people here are;
1 not swingers
2 don't swing
3 don't understand swinging"
so what would you class as swinging.99% pecent of couples are meet verified so In what way are they not swingers?to be honast though we just use this site for fun times with others we don't care or even think about being a swinger or not.we are here for our own selfish reasons and will use a free site to do so, we don't want a badge of honour for "swinging" the correct way lol. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet... "
But you said you're not a swinger, you're a journalist. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Anyone else on there? I have to say, as a single guy, I'm more successful on there than I am on here.
How is it that that's easier than a swinging site? I hate all the Snapchat filters on there though. Girls, you look like retards with those on your pictures! Haha
Still looking for my first FAB meet... "
Fab is a swingers site not a dating or hook up site. Totally different. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm on both.
My tinder profile is a little more PG
Of the people I see in a kind of FB way, a couple are from tinder, a couple from Fab. The only exclusive dating I did I met through fab.
I've been the extra f in an mff through both tinder and fab.
They've slightly different pools of people, I like that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
.