FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > help me to understand

help me to understand

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *ric99 OP   Couple  over a year ago

bridgwater

we say we do not want to meet bi or bi-curious men on our profile/ but the messages we get from men who is looking to meet tvs or had meets with tvs, we decline a meet with them explaining because our profile says no bi or bi-curious men, they all to often then reply that they are not bi 0r bi-curious.

so could someone put me right on this issue.....are they or are they not bisexual

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Fabstraight, we call them.

Men who are straight but have hankering for trans people.

Thing is, sexuality is a spectrum, and most people will have some bisexual tendencies, even those who say they are 100% straight or gay. I for one am straight, but I'm not going to freak out if my balls touched another man's balls during action.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

They're in denial or just plain old lying. On the other hand, they could have just met up with a trans girl for a social.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *irginieWoman  over a year ago

Near Marlborough

You don't need to understand. You have made your preferences clear. Just ignore people that don't meet what you're looking for.

V x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The issue is not with them being bi or not being bi

I would say they are bi ...they might have a different view.

It is a fact that they have had a meet with a guy though

And im going to assume that is the part that causes the issue

If you simply dont want to meet anyone who has had a meet with a guy

Then how they define themselves doesnt matter

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0