 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
We all have preferences and we all try our best to find the best person for a potential meet.
If you found your ideal but there's something about them you didn't like or could be a problem in the future, would you turn a blind eye or continue as planned?
Just curious.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"We all have preferences and we all try our best to find the best person for a potential meet.
If you found your ideal but there's something about them you didn't like or could be a problem in the future, would you turn a blind eye or continue as planned?
Just curious.
"
correction: run like the wind lol  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Um... well profile requirements are just a guide to not waste guys time really. Have to click and be attracted to. Not all our friends have ticked every box, and some who have, we have not met as we just didnt like them. Cant really meet people based on tick boxes, its just a starting point. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The criteria for playmates and life partners are not the same, the former being less, for me personally.
Therefore, yes, I would play with an non-ideal, so long as sufficient boxes have been ticked, and the ones that don't are not the ones that are trivial and not deal-breaking.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This is fantasy for me, so no, I wouldn't play with them. I met a gorgeous man: he was the spitting image of Daniel Craig. I was already picturing him naked until he opened his mouth...he sounded like Joe Pasquale and spoke about his mother the whole meet.
There was no way I could play with him.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The criteria for playmates and life partners are not the same, the former being less, for me personally.
Therefore, yes, I would play with an non-ideal, so long as sufficient boxes have been ticked, and the ones that don't are not the ones that are trivial and not deal-breaking. "
+1 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No.. if there was something then I'd just make it clear...
Of course final choices are not mine.. but I report back exactly how I felt..
But if there is anything that may cause issue later then its a no..
Of course its different if I'm looking for a guy for a group situation but if I'm going to have to kiss him, then I need to be comfy.
Cali X |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ENDAROOSCouple
over a year ago
South West London / Surrey |
That's a good question!
For me think it would depend on the situation I was meeting them in.
In a group/party situation its not as important to me that they tick all the boxes where on a private 1-2-1 meet it is. (I haven't worded that very well but I know what I mean 
But I still have to like and be attracted to them to play, whatever the situation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
