 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Vanilla, kink and fetish...
What would say the differences are?
I read on a profile somewhere that a couple were only up for kinky meets and not vanilla, and it got me thinking, how do people define the difference?
Anal may be a standard thing for a couple so they see it as vanilla, but to another it could be a dark art saved only for the naughtiest of moments.
So what do you think, where are people's definition boundaries with these terms? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think there is no standard definition, you've pointed out the reasoning in your post! If I see that on a profile then I'd find out where the line is via conversation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I think there is no standard definition, you've pointed out the reasoning in your post! If I see that on a profile then I'd find out where the line is via conversation."
That's my definition I guess, I was interested in how other people define them, what do people consider vanilla vs kink vs fetish? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's all relative surely, thinking about vanilla v kink. I expect if I told my mates we were on here they would think we were into kink. But to us a straightforward threesome is pretty vanilla and only verges on kink when restraints, inflicting pain or more niche games are involved. And to me a fetish is just a specific kink that someone particularly desires. If someone has a proper definition I'm all ears and ready to learn. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
