FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes, it is. " Yes it is polite? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread would have been funnier if no one had replied " Lmao! So true! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread would have been funnier if no one had replied " I was thinking the same thing... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just as you take a look at someone's profile, pics, interests etc before deciding if you'll message them, so will that person have a look at your profile, pics, interests etc before deciding whether they'll reply. Your profile is just as important as the message you send and in a lot of cases, even more important." Point taken. No one is saying that you must meet because you've been messaged. But a polite no thank you surely isnt too much to expect? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry Bikegent...it is the nature of the beast. The power ultimately lies with the women due to us blokes being in the vast majority!......." Lol @ 'bikegent'. Its a shame as the vast majority of women want to be treated with respect but don't seem to know what to do with it when its politely emailed to their inbox exactly in the manner they requested... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" When I was first on here I got so many messages I had to hide my profile in order to respond to them all. Only one fella sent a rude response to my polite no thank you. Everyone else was lovely and pleased to have had a response Then I got a tip from one of my boys to block everyone and do my own searches. It's working fabulously xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This topic comes up multiple times a day. I've heard every argument possible and I still can't understand why people get so butthurt about it." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? " Oooooo... Lets go! First off I did do my research. You did not. The last thread on this topic was over a year ago. In the ever changing world of fab I don't think that is relevant. Its a new year, perceptions change (although apparently arrogant people don't). Secondly as I just said in a previous post in no way does an email equal a meet. It would be ludicrous to imagine that. There is absolutely nothing in my initial rant to indicate that. I do think though that a respectful polite email is entitled to one by return. And thirdly (can you read? Or do you make up things as you read?) if you read the thing properly I'm not expecting people to respond to every email. Just the ones that upon being read give evidence that the sender has tried. And even if it's an unsucessful try have the courtesy to say: sorry not for me. I appreciate though that this may be too much for some | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? Oooooo... Lets go! First off I did do my research. You did not. The last thread on this topic was over a year ago. In the ever changing world of fab I don't think that is relevant. Its a new year, perceptions change (although apparently arrogant people don't). Secondly as I just said in a previous post in no way does an email equal a meet. It would be ludicrous to imagine that. There is absolutely nothing in my initial rant to indicate that. I do think though that a respectful polite email is entitled to one by return. And thirdly (can you read? Or do you make up things as you read?) if you read the thing properly I'm not expecting people to respond to every email. Just the ones that upon being read give evidence that the sender has tried. And even if it's an unsucessful try have the courtesy to say: sorry not for me. I appreciate though that this may be too much for some " Lmao, you're level of bitterness over your sense of entitlement being dented is overwhelming, certainly shows your character Interestingly is see threads on this very subject at 7 weeks old, 10 weeks old, 12 weeks old, 17 weeks old, shall I go on? But I appreciate this can be difficult to type a simple word I a search box, for some..... Perhaps spending as much time reading the FAQ's rather than profiles you so painstakingly take the time to mail, so you understand the guidance might be an idea? And because you deem to show interest in someone, and take a little bit of time over a message that should entitle you to a reply? I tell you what, if it bothers you so much, don't do it. If you can't be bothered to put that bit of effort in in the hope that someone will just jump at the chance to chat with you, and eventually fall on their backs for you, then don't. The other guys that write the similar types of messages, without expectations, who don't go and rant about it, and don't get twisted over not getting a reply will have the success. And, you don't expect people to answer every mail..... just yours, because you took the time to write a nice mail. I would say if there any hint of arrogance, it's right there.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? Oooooo... Lets go! First off I did do my research. You did not. The last thread on this topic was over a year ago. In the ever changing world of fab I don't think that is relevant. Its a new year, perceptions change (although apparently arrogant people don't). Secondly as I just said in a previous post in no way does an email equal a meet. It would be ludicrous to imagine that. There is absolutely nothing in my initial rant to indicate that. I do think though that a respectful polite email is entitled to one by return. And thirdly (can you read? Or do you make up things as you read?) if you read the thing properly I'm not expecting people to respond to every email. Just the ones that upon being read give evidence that the sender has tried. And even if it's an unsucessful try have the courtesy to say: sorry not for me. I appreciate though that this may be too much for some Lmao, you're level of bitterness over your sense of entitlement being dented is overwhelming, certainly shows your character Interestingly is see threads on this very subject at 7 weeks old, 10 weeks old, 12 weeks old, 17 weeks old, shall I go on? But I appreciate this can be difficult to type a simple word I a search box, for some..... Perhaps spending as much time reading the FAQ's rather than profiles you so painstakingly take the time to mail, so you understand the guidance might be an idea? And because you deem to show interest in someone, and take a little bit of time over a message that should entitle you to a reply? I tell you what, if it bothers you so much, don't do it. If you can't be bothered to put that bit of effort in in the hope that someone will just jump at the chance to chat with you, and eventually fall on their backs for you, then don't. The other guys that write the similar types of messages, without expectations, who don't go and rant about it, and don't get twisted over not getting a reply will have the success. And, you don't expect people to answer every mail..... just yours, because you took the time to write a nice mail. I would say if there any hint of arrogance, it's right there...." Yep. Your a lazy one. Can't even be bothered to proof read your own posts and use correct grammar. Plus you defintely hallucinate. Did you see anywhere that I'm asking for a chat? Or demanding that someone falls on their back? (doggystyle please). Nothing in what I've said denies people the right to decline. I'm just asking that they be polite about it. But that you would argue whether being polite should be an expectation says much about your character... Do you have kids? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? Oooooo... Lets go! First off I did do my research. You did not. The last thread on this topic was over a year ago. In the ever changing world of fab I don't think that is relevant. Its a new year, perceptions change (although apparently arrogant people don't). Secondly as I just said in a previous post in no way does an email equal a meet. It would be ludicrous to imagine that. There is absolutely nothing in my initial rant to indicate that. I do think though that a respectful polite email is entitled to one by return. And thirdly (can you read? Or do you make up things as you read?) if you read the thing properly I'm not expecting people to respond to every email. Just the ones that upon being read give evidence that the sender has tried. And even if it's an unsucessful try have the courtesy to say: sorry not for me. I appreciate though that this may be too much for some Lmao, you're level of bitterness over your sense of entitlement being dented is overwhelming, certainly shows your character Interestingly is see threads on this very subject at 7 weeks old, 10 weeks old, 12 weeks old, 17 weeks old, shall I go on? But I appreciate this can be difficult to type a simple word I a search box, for some..... Perhaps spending as much time reading the FAQ's rather than profiles you so painstakingly take the time to mail, so you understand the guidance might be an idea? And because you deem to show interest in someone, and take a little bit of time over a message that should entitle you to a reply? I tell you what, if it bothers you so much, don't do it. If you can't be bothered to put that bit of effort in in the hope that someone will just jump at the chance to chat with you, and eventually fall on their backs for you, then don't. The other guys that write the similar types of messages, without expectations, who don't go and rant about it, and don't get twisted over not getting a reply will have the success. And, you don't expect people to answer every mail..... just yours, because you took the time to write a nice mail. I would say if there any hint of arrogance, it's right there.... Yep. Your a lazy one. Can't even be bothered to proof read your own posts and use correct grammar. Plus you defintely hallucinate. Did you see anywhere that I'm asking for a chat? Or demanding that someone falls on their back? (doggystyle please). Nothing in what I've said denies people the right to decline. I'm just asking that they be polite about it. But that you would argue whether being polite should be an expectation says much about your character... Do you have kids?" I'll leave you to it, you just carry on, you're doing just wonderfully | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? Oooooo... Lets go! First off I did do my research. You did not. The last thread on this topic was over a year ago. In the ever changing world of fab I don't think that is relevant. Its a new year, perceptions change (although apparently arrogant people don't). Secondly as I just said in a previous post in no way does an email equal a meet. It would be ludicrous to imagine that. There is absolutely nothing in my initial rant to indicate that. I do think though that a respectful polite email is entitled to one by return. And thirdly (can you read? Or do you make up things as you read?) if you read the thing properly I'm not expecting people to respond to every email. Just the ones that upon being read give evidence that the sender has tried. And even if it's an unsucessful try have the courtesy to say: sorry not for me. I appreciate though that this may be too much for some Lmao, you're level of bitterness over your sense of entitlement being dented is overwhelming, certainly shows your character Interestingly is see threads on this very subject at 7 weeks old, 10 weeks old, 12 weeks old, 17 weeks old, shall I go on? But I appreciate this can be difficult to type a simple word I a search box, for some..... Perhaps spending as much time reading the FAQ's rather than profiles you so painstakingly take the time to mail, so you understand the guidance might be an idea? And because you deem to show interest in someone, and take a little bit of time over a message that should entitle you to a reply? I tell you what, if it bothers you so much, don't do it. If you can't be bothered to put that bit of effort in in the hope that someone will just jump at the chance to chat with you, and eventually fall on their backs for you, then don't. The other guys that write the similar types of messages, without expectations, who don't go and rant about it, and don't get twisted over not getting a reply will have the success. And, you don't expect people to answer every mail..... just yours, because you took the time to write a nice mail. I would say if there any hint of arrogance, it's right there.... Yep. Your a lazy one. Can't even be bothered to proof read your own posts and use correct grammar. Plus you defintely hallucinate. Did you see anywhere that I'm asking for a chat? Or demanding that someone falls on their back? (doggystyle please). Nothing in what I've said denies people the right to decline. I'm just asking that they be polite about it. But that you would argue whether being polite should be an expectation says much about your character... Do you have kids?" *you're *definitely Sorry...couldn't resist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is putting the phone down on a cold caller, irrespective of all the hours they slaved over the pitch they wanted to give you, better than wasting their time by talking to them when there's absolutely no chance you'll buy what they're selling or, worse still, metering out some kind of abuse on them? I think you know the answer " Say no thank you not for me. That's better than hanging up. Plus cold caller know nothing about you. I would equate them to the guys who send: 'Hi wanna fuck?' messages. I'm not referring to those emails. By all means ignore those. Here someone has taken the time to inform themselves about your likes and dislikes etc. And your fine to just ignore them? Ok. I quit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? Oooooo... Lets go! First off I did do my research. You did not. The last thread on this topic was over a year ago. In the ever changing world of fab I don't think that is relevant. Its a new year, perceptions change (although apparently arrogant people don't). Secondly as I just said in a previous post in no way does an email equal a meet. It would be ludicrous to imagine that. There is absolutely nothing in my initial rant to indicate that. I do think though that a respectful polite email is entitled to one by return. And thirdly (can you read? Or do you make up things as you read?) if you read the thing properly I'm not expecting people to respond to every email. Just the ones that upon being read give evidence that the sender has tried. And even if it's an unsucessful try have the courtesy to say: sorry not for me. I appreciate though that this may be too much for some Lmao, you're level of bitterness over your sense of entitlement being dented is overwhelming, certainly shows your character Interestingly is see threads on this very subject at 7 weeks old, 10 weeks old, 12 weeks old, 17 weeks old, shall I go on? But I appreciate this can be difficult to type a simple word I a search box, for some..... Perhaps spending as much time reading the FAQ's rather than profiles you so painstakingly take the time to mail, so you understand the guidance might be an idea? And because you deem to show interest in someone, and take a little bit of time over a message that should entitle you to a reply? I tell you what, if it bothers you so much, don't do it. If you can't be bothered to put that bit of effort in in the hope that someone will just jump at the chance to chat with you, and eventually fall on their backs for you, then don't. The other guys that write the similar types of messages, without expectations, who don't go and rant about it, and don't get twisted over not getting a reply will have the success. And, you don't expect people to answer every mail..... just yours, because you took the time to write a nice mail. I would say if there any hint of arrogance, it's right there.... Yep. Your a lazy one. Can't even be bothered to proof read your own posts and use correct grammar. Plus you defintely hallucinate. Did you see anywhere that I'm asking for a chat? Or demanding that someone falls on their back? (doggystyle please). Nothing in what I've said denies people the right to decline. I'm just asking that they be polite about it. But that you would argue whether being polite should be an expectation says much about your character... Do you have kids? *you're *definitely Sorry...couldn't resist " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's simply supply and demand. The ladies get swamped at the slight raise of a hem, get pissed off with it and cant do much other than switch off certain groups. (Hopefully employing other strategies as above re own searches). Nobody is really wrong here, no need to fall out either. Eventually it comes down to trying your best to have fun and a lot of luck! I do think a THANKS BUT NO THANKS Button, to quick reply with would be a good idea. Sid" No it wouldn't, as then people would bitch that it's too impersonal a way to reply after they've typed out a well thought out message. I've seen it happen on the forums of another site I use that have a similar feature as the one you suggest | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some days I get more messages than most, and those increase further on days when you upload new pics or advertise a meet, or even if it's just a weekend with horny piss heads that delete their account the next day. My worst day on here I advertised a meet after uploading a new pics in the space of 5 hours I got 356 new messages ( that's with filters in place), if you're not a site supporter you can only send 200 messages a day, so it would have been mathematically impossible to reply to all. Even leaving replying to roll over to the next day still couldn't reply to all as I would have accumulated even more messages (average 50-80 a day) , and so on it goes. Not to mention, who realistically has the time to type " thanks but no thanks" or words to that effect 356 times in one day? even if they could as a site supporter, between kids and work I certainly don't have the time. Considering all this it's not laziness it's just a more productive use of time to only reply to people that interest you and why a delete is to be considered a polite no thank you. " Thank you so much for your informative and level headed response. Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" Laziness. And Fab condones it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" In the words of Queen Elsa; 'let it go, let it go' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" Ok fella I commend you on your effort with your writing here but I feel your over thinking and over trying . Easiest way to have fun is to not try to have fun by that I mean don't take it all so seriously and just have a laugh. so what if your efforts are ignored by those who you message my advice less effort more piss taking and you will enjoy yourself inbetween getting laid | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not quite sure why people have felt the need to lay into the OP. He's perfectly entitled to pose his question to the forum, and there is nothing in forum rules or forum ettiquete that suggests one should read previous threads on a topic instead of posting a new one. Indeed if nobody ever posted a topic that had been posted before there would be not much left on the forum! Likewise forumites are entitled to ignored forums threads on topics that they feel have been overdone. However there is a fair bit of sarcasm in your post OP, and it seems to irritate you that you have to send a face pics, and that you have to do or not do various other things as part of the sending a message process. Maybe that's why you instigated a strong reaction from some forumites. With regards to your question. If you followed that formula that you described, we would probably feel obliged to reply, as we only get one or two messages a day, and about half don't deserve a reply. So admittedly it's not a big deal for us to reply. However after over 2 years of getting about 1 message per day that in our mind warrants a reply, it does start to become like a tedious daily admin process, which we certainly never signed up for when we joined Fab for our own selfish reasons. The other issue that slightly irritates me is that whenever we politely reply we nearly always get a reply saying 'thank you for replying'. If we must reply, it would be nice to think that our reply signifies the end of the communication. I don't know what the answer is. In reality I think it needs to be accepted that internet etiquette is not the same as real life etiquette, and it would be impractical to think it is. Btw I put the phone down without saying anything to cold callers. That's because I find their intrusion rude. Mrs " They lay onto him because by doing so they feel superior classic behavior for a sex site and very funny but a good guide on who to avoid at all costs if you want to have fun memorable meets . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? I guess it could be considered as being as lazy as not bothering to read up on or research the million and one other threads about this very subject? And of course, by the mere fact that you took that time to go to the trouble to write such a message to so one, in the hope that you might have sex with them, because you are interested in them, this gives you some degree of entitlement too? And I'm guessing by this, you'd be quite happy to pass on tips on how you manage your time efficiently to allow you the ability to singularly reply to every one of multiple message you get every day like some of the members on here? Oooooo... Lets go! First off I did do my research. You did not. The last thread on this topic was over a year ago. In the ever changing world of fab I don't think that is relevant. Its a new year, perceptions change (although apparently arrogant people don't). Secondly as I just said in a previous post in no way does an email equal a meet. It would be ludicrous to imagine that. There is absolutely nothing in my initial rant to indicate that. I do think though that a respectful polite email is entitled to one by return. And thirdly (can you read? Or do you make up things as you read?) if you read the thing properly I'm not expecting people to respond to every email. Just the ones that upon being read give evidence that the sender has tried. And even if it's an unsucessful try have the courtesy to say: sorry not for me. I appreciate though that this may be too much for some " When people put a meet thread up they can get literally hundreds of messages a day. That's on top of what they normally receive. They'd need a permanent secretary to send a "thanks but no thanks" reply to every one. Site FAQ has the answer to your original question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness? In the words of Queen Elsa; 'let it go, let it go' " To be fair, she's a bit frigid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just as you take a look at someone's profile, pics, interests etc before deciding if you'll message them, so will that person have a look at your profile, pics, interests etc before deciding whether they'll reply. Your profile is just as important as the message you send and in a lot of cases, even more important. Point taken. No one is saying that you must meet because you've been messaged. But a polite no thank you surely isnt too much to expect? " It is to much to expect though. Fab says no reply means no thanks. What if a woman has recieved 50 other messeges, should she reply to them all ? Also my experience is that if i reply no thanks then the guy sees that as an invitation to then ask why and sometimes they get abusive. So it's often easier to simply ignore and delete. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why can't it be both laziness and polite? It is from me. I won't be replying because I can't be arsed, but I also don't like polite rejection messages myself and would rather mine were deleted. So I'm treating others as I would like to be treated." I take the same approach you do but I also ask them to delete the message if not interested. Most don't even do that. I honestly think people do enjoy being ignorant. No reply is not ignorant but not even doing a simple request like deleting mail to inform the sender of their intentions is, imo. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why can't it be both laziness and polite? It is from me. I won't be replying because I can't be arsed, but I also don't like polite rejection messages myself and would rather mine were deleted. So I'm treating others as I would like to be treated. I take the same approach you do but I also ask them to delete the message if not interested. Most don't even do that. I honestly think people do enjoy being ignorant. No reply is not ignorant but not even doing a simple request like deleting mail to inform the sender of their intentions is, imo." you really don't understand how us lazy people work, do you? If I can't be bothered to reply I'm not going to bother opening and deleting a message! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why can't it be both laziness and polite? It is from me. I won't be replying because I can't be arsed, but I also don't like polite rejection messages myself and would rather mine were deleted. So I'm treating others as I would like to be treated. I take the same approach you do but I also ask them to delete the message if not interested. Most don't even do that. I honestly think people do enjoy being ignorant. No reply is not ignorant but not even doing a simple request like deleting mail to inform the sender of their intentions is, imo." I delete my sent mail box so I don't know if they've deleted it or not. I don't really care, I think ignoring it or deleting it is effectively the same. All I (now) ask for is not to waste my time with a no thanks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why can't it be both laziness and polite? It is from me. I won't be replying because I can't be arsed, but I also don't like polite rejection messages myself and would rather mine were deleted. So I'm treating others as I would like to be treated. I take the same approach you do but I also ask them to delete the message if not interested. Most don't even do that. I honestly think people do enjoy being ignorant. No reply is not ignorant but not even doing a simple request like deleting mail to inform the sender of their intentions is, imo. I delete my sent mail box so I don't know if they've deleted it or not. I don't really care, I think ignoring it or deleting it is effectively the same. All I (now) ask for is not to waste my time with a no thanks. " It opened my eyes. People seem to enjoy being defiant. Even with a polite request. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why can't it be both laziness and polite? It is from me. I won't be replying because I can't be arsed, but I also don't like polite rejection messages myself and would rather mine were deleted. So I'm treating others as I would like to be treated. I take the same approach you do but I also ask them to delete the message if not interested. Most don't even do that. I honestly think people do enjoy being ignorant. No reply is not ignorant but not even doing a simple request like deleting mail to inform the sender of their intentions is, imo. you really don't understand how us lazy people work, do you? If I can't be bothered to reply I'm not going to bother opening and deleting a message! " That's best for both in that case because that level of laziness is a massive turn off for me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not quite sure why people have felt the need to lay into the OP. He's perfectly entitled to pose his question to the forum, and there is nothing in forum rules or forum ettiquete that suggests one should read previous threads on a topic instead of posting a new one. Indeed if nobody ever posted a topic that had been posted before there would be not much left on the forum! Likewise forumites are entitled to ignored forums threads on topics that they feel have been overdone. However there is a fair bit of sarcasm in your post OP, and it seems to irritate you that you have to send a face pics, and that you have to do or not do various other things as part of the sending a message process. Maybe that's why you instigated a strong reaction from some forumites. With regards to your question. If you followed that formula that you described, we would probably feel obliged to reply, as we only get one or two messages a day, and about half don't deserve a reply. So admittedly it's not a big deal for us to reply. However after over 2 years of getting about 1 message per day that in our mind warrants a reply, it does start to become like a tedious daily admin process, which we certainly never signed up for when we joined Fab for our own selfish reasons. The other issue that slightly irritates me is that whenever we politely reply we nearly always get a reply saying 'thank you for replying'. If we must reply, it would be nice to think that our reply signifies the end of the communication. I don't know what the answer is. In reality I think it needs to be accepted that internet etiquette is not the same as real life etiquette, and it would be impractical to think it is. Btw I put the phone down without saying anything to cold callers. That's because I find their intrusion rude. Mrs " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why can't it be both laziness and polite? It is from me. I won't be replying because I can't be arsed, but I also don't like polite rejection messages myself and would rather mine were deleted. So I'm treating others as I would like to be treated. I take the same approach you do but I also ask them to delete the message if not interested. Most don't even do that. I honestly think people do enjoy being ignorant. No reply is not ignorant but not even doing a simple request like deleting mail to inform the sender of their intentions is, imo. you really don't understand how us lazy people work, do you? If I can't be bothered to reply I'm not going to bother opening and deleting a message! That's best for both in that case because that level of laziness is a massive turn off for me." couldn't agree more. I'd rather save my energy for those that interest me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
". Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" I agree. No response to a polite well thought out message is not polite. No reply to short shitty and/ or rude messages is to be expected. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" Do you phone up every chinese take away that puts a leaflet through your door to politley say "thanks for the menu but i wont be ordering from you"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This topic comes up multiple times a day. I've heard every argument possible and I still can't understand why people get so butthurt about it." People get 'butthurt' about it because they perceive it as rude - and (to an extent) they are right when comparing Fab behaviour to normal social constructs. Often you find that the ones who reserve the right to treat you like you don't exist are the same people demanding to be treated like a prince/princess. It's one of the many dichotomies that exist purely in the Fab 'social' sphere that I find both highly amusing and sad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Interesting point that come up. Laziness. Are we entitled to be lazy?" Oh absolutely. Laziness is a motivator in lots of things I do. It makes me look for ways which are efficient and effective, rather than repeating the same things over and over without success (which is the source of many an angst-fuelled thread on here) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is on Fab " I don't care what the FAQ on fab says about no reply - I was brought up to be respectful, kind and well-mannered. Ignoring a message is not polite - I always decline with a brief polite no thank you. m x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is on Fab I don't care what the FAQ on fab says about no reply - I was brought up to be respectful, kind and well-mannered. Ignoring a message is not polite - I always decline with a brief polite no thank you. m x " Let me just get you that medal. I was also brought up to be respectful, kind and well mannered. It's perfectly respectful to ignore a message I didn't solicit, kinder to delete rather than tell them the reasons I find them deeply unattractive and well-mannered to respond as I would like to be responded to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is on Fab I don't care what the FAQ on fab says about no reply - I was brought up to be respectful, kind and well-mannered. Ignoring a message is not polite - I always decline with a brief polite no thank you. m x Let me just get you that medal. I was also brought up to be respectful, kind and well mannered. It's perfectly respectful to ignore a message I didn't solicit, kinder to delete rather than tell them the reasons I find them deeply unattractive and well-mannered to respond as I would like to be responded to. " Spot on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is on Fab I don't care what the FAQ on fab says about no reply - I was brought up to be respectful, kind and well-mannered. Ignoring a message is not polite - I always decline with a brief polite no thank you. m x " Thumbs up about the FAQs. People treat them like Gospel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You get countless leaflets/flyers/cold calling letters drop through the door daily. I take it you go to the effort of calling them all and saying no thank you? " This exactly for me - and I'm really not trying to be nasty or unpleasant op! I get a lot of messages from a lot of people that I didn't ask for - and if I replied to it all then fab would literally be a 24/7 occupation! Also - once you send out a reply - even a brief 'no thanks' - any future filters you put up (re age etc) become useless as the hundreds/thousands you've politely declined over time can message you at will until you block them all individually - which renders all the filters pointless! I do think there should be a standard 'no thank you' message we can send which doesn't mean the sender/respond ant gets past future filters. This would give people 'closure' as it were - at least they'd know where they stood! I think it would also be great if, once the standard 'no thank you' message had been sent out - the 'interested party' was still able to view the pretty pictures etc (no harm there imo) but prevented from sending future messages! Apologies for the long-winded response op! Xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" At least you know they are not interested that way. The worst one is when it remains unread! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Do you phone up every chinese take away that puts a leaflet through your door to politley say "thanks for the menu but i wont be ordering from you"?" No I put them in a drawer and try them eventually | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In addition: TIME does not equal SEX. You don't put TIME in and get SEX out. Stop being so entitled." Where did the OP explicitly state he was entitled to sex? In struggling to find it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" Obviously you didn't read the FAQ's because according to them, it really is a polite 'no thanks' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shows how lowly men are regarded in this day and age when analogies of junk mail and Chinese take away junk mail are being produced. You'd never think that they were actually human beings would you?" Who said anything about it just being messages from men? My statements equally apply to the even more unsolicited messages from women and couple I get if my filters are down. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shows how lowly men are regarded in this day and age when analogies of junk mail and Chinese take away junk mail are being produced. You'd never think that they were actually human beings would you?" However, there are some that use this site who sadly don't conduct themselves like human beings. It's a double edged sword. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I always reply.. even if it's a polite fxxk Off!!! " Thats usually my polite reply after several deleted messages or actual no thank-yous! Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just as you take a look at someone's profile, pics, interests etc before deciding if you'll message them, so will that person have a look at your profile, pics, interests etc before deciding whether they'll reply. Your profile is just as important as the message you send and in a lot of cases, even more important. Point taken. No one is saying that you must meet because you've been messaged. But a polite no thank you surely isnt too much to expect? " I think most people start off replying with a "thanks, no thanks" to be met with "why not" "wouldn't touch you with someone else's" type response. Just as not receiving a reply may be frustrating, so is abuse. It's easier for some to ignore those they're not interested in rather than expose themselves to the petulant, entitled whines that follow. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shows how lowly men are regarded in this day and age when analogies of junk mail and Chinese take away junk mail are being produced. You'd never think that they were actually human beings would you?" Mail you don't want is junk mail, wether that be through your letter box or via a pm, regardless of its source its junk mail, sheer fact. The biggest proportion of my messages come from people I state I've no interest in, why when I've already said I wouldn't want them, should I have to say it again? Please enlighten me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shows how lowly men are regarded in this day and age when analogies of junk mail and Chinese take away junk mail are being produced. You'd never think that they were actually human beings would you?" That's true. But there is a lot of dehumanising on the internet (I like to think Im not guilty of it, and and glad to say that in return I usually treated accordingly). But Fab is rife with shitty behaviour from all demographics - men, women, couples. The horror stories I've heard about people not turning up for a meet, or cancelling at short notice for no good reason - why would one treat a human being like this? The arrogance portrayed on the forums and on people profiles, that I suspect they wouldn't portray in real life. Then there are the guys (fortunately this doesn't happen too often with us) who randomly message us with no information on their profile except a picture of a dick and asks if I want some sex! That makes me feel like an animal not a human being. To be quite honest not replying to a message is the least of Fab's problems when it comes to not treating people like human beings. Also the men who grumble about not getting replies, do they always treat their playmates like humans? Or when they are tired of someone do they just disappear? I don't agree and I hope I don't do it, but it's very easy to sit behind a keyboard and forget that people are human beings. That why we find it better at organised socials or parties, where people talk to each other properly face to face as human beings. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is on Fab I don't care what the FAQ on fab says about no reply - I was brought up to be respectful, kind and well-mannered. Ignoring a message is not polite - I always decline with a brief polite no thank you. m x Let me just get you that medal. I was also brought up to be respectful, kind and well mannered. It's perfectly respectful to ignore a message I didn't solicit, kinder to delete rather than tell them the reasons I find them deeply unattractive and well-mannered to respond as I would like to be responded to. Spot on. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"when I replied 'thanks but no thanks' the majority of the time I got either abuse (well you're a fat fucker anyway etc) asked why not, or sent another message thanking me for rejection. all pointless, all taking ip my time, and then they are un restricted by my filters when they're back on/changed. I didn't ask for mail, If they've not bothered to read my profile, or have ignored it, or something in there mail/profile (I read the profile 1st) that puts me off, Then I'm not going to reply. I dont understand why so many blokes get hung up on getting a reply that is siply a rejection. " edited as I think faster than i type. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just as you take a look at someone's profile, pics, interests etc before deciding if you'll message them, so will that person have a look at your profile, pics, interests etc before deciding whether they'll reply. Your profile is just as important as the message you send and in a lot of cases, even more important. Point taken. No one is saying that you must meet because you've been messaged. But a polite no thank you surely isnt too much to expect? " No because replying on fab means any filters you later apply won't affect that person simply because you were polite enough to say no thanks. People rarely leave and try to continue a conversation or ask why | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In addition: TIME does not equal SEX. You don't put TIME in and get SEX out. Stop being so entitled. Where did the OP explicitly state he was entitled to sex? In struggling to find it. " Why else would he want a reply, other than to try and continue the conversation? (Which is what most people do - you say 'no thank you' and then they try and have a chat.) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's simply supply and demand. The ladies get swamped at the slight raise of a hem, get pissed off with it and cant do much other than switch off certain groups. (Hopefully employing other strategies as above re own searches). Nobody is really wrong here, no need to fall out either. Eventually it comes down to trying your best to have fun and a lot of luck! I do think a THANKS BUT NO THANKS Button, to quick reply with would be a good idea. Sid No it wouldn't, as then people would bitch that it's too impersonal a way to reply after they've typed out a well thought out message. I've seen it happen on the forums of another site I use that have a similar feature as the one you suggest " So have I!!! The vitriol, venom and sense of entitlement... good Lord! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't know if anyone else has said this but if profiles require you to jump through hoops and you're not regularly getting responses from them why are you still making the effort they require? Contact profiles that require less effort. That said I realise it must be wearing to effectively shout into an empty space. We do try and reply to almost everyone but for loads of reasons some messages are extremely difficult to respond to and are best left unanswered. As to whether it's polite or not, I think on Fab politeness is slightly skewed. I've never been approached outside of fab by someone introducing themselves with "your tits look great I'd love to spunk all over them"." I think that's an extremely good point. Manners on Fab are somewhat different from 'real' life. On Fab it's considered perfectly normal to show a prospective sex partner your genitals long before you show your face. In real life that would be the height of rudeness. I think in an internet age it has to be accepted that there are a different set of rules for on-line communication. What I cannot accept though is when communication gets to the point where that person is 'real', that people don't behave with decency. Or when people are just nasty for their own sadistic thrills. But being lazy with anonymous people? That probably has to be accepted as part of internet etiquette, which is not the same as real life ettiquete. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm amazed at the amount of people who still haven't realised that interaction on the internet is completely different to social interaction in the real world. To compare the two and say that people are rude/lazy/ignorant because they don't reply to a message asking for a fuck (ultimately) just makes me wonder how little interaction many actually have outside of fab. Try applying for jobs. That really does knock your confidence when you get no response,but eventually you have to accept that it's the way things are. It's not ideal but we don't live in an ideal world. Bleating and whingeing about people's behaviour isn't attractive and certainly won't change their behaviour. " That's a very good point. The norm with job applications is if you don't hear back after a certain time, thento assume that you have not been successful at getting to the interview stage. Is that rude not to receive a formal rejection letter? I don't know. It's just the way it's done. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got chastised by one guy recently for replying politely declining. Apparently any reply is showing the person attention, which I was then informed was wrong and implied I was leading him on." You hussy! Shaking your "no thanks" message in his face like that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry Bikegent...it is the nature of the beast. The power ultimately lies with the women due to us blokes being in the vast majority!....... Lol @ 'bikegent'. Its a shame as the vast majority of women want to be treated with respect but don't seem to know what to do with it when its politely emailed to their inbox exactly in the manner they requested..." Ah but woman want to be treated with respect except she they don't But in answer to the OP a no answer and deleted is a not intrested I just block them so I don't bother them again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This OP is the story of my life here on this site! I have also taken the time to read, note and politely approach, without success! I no longer jump through hoops to meet women here, as I am convinced it can be a waste of time! However what I do find is that fabs is only good for keeping in-touch with women I have already 'broke-the-ice' with in clubs prior." When visible my profile clearly sets out what I'm looking for/offering. There's absolutely no ambiguity. I was contacted by some the polar opposite of what I was looking for. After looking at his profile and ascertaining he hadn't read my profile or he wouldnt have wasted his time, he started a thread about the rude women on site who delete well thought out, polite messages. I'm nmconvinced people are being ignored because in their mind they think they're a perfect match, when in reality they aren't. Anyone who meets my criteria gets a response. In seven years no abuse or why not because after I say no, I don't read anything else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"(deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well said indeed. What the same people who demand such high standards / rules / requirements / hoop jumping, don't understand is that a simple thanks but no thanks is not only polite, but in 99% of cases will satisfy the 'applicant' ! The no reply is actually more likely to fill up tgeir inbox with follow ups and newly constructed applications for the post of sex buddy extraordinaire ! Simple courtesy please ! (deep breath... Ok... And..... go!) So... You like the look of a profile; the pics, the write up, the interests etc and you decide to make contact. You take careful note of the age, height, build, ethnic and proximity preferences. You check if they dislike beards or uncut willies. You make sure you put the special phrase they request at the end of their spiel to show you actually read the entire bio. You not only make sure you don't ask how are they doing today (because that apparently annoys the hell out of everyone in the UK) but also go through the painstaking effort of writing more than one sentence. You dont copy and paste. You sit there for 30 minutes trying to be unique but at the same time genuine and show by the effort you put forth in your message you'll likely put the same effort into an actual meet. You dont send a cock pic because they are of the devil and this isnt a sex site. Despite your own need for privacy you obediently send a face to pic because: 'No face pic no reply'. You literally jump through cyberspace fire hoops to simply express to someone here that you think you and them doing what we all came here to do would be a good idea... And whats the result? Hmmm? What return do you get from that investment? Hmmm? I'll tell you: Nothing. No reply. Message read and......... Deleted... My question is: what is polite about that? Since when in British society has ignoring someone ever been the polite thing to do? (or does fab exist outside of society?) Especially when all the filters, requirements and tests have been passed. Is no response really a 'polite' no thank you? Or is it laziness?" This whole thing is utter bollocks. Why would you jump through all those hoops if you don't want to? Why are any of you spending half an hour on your messages? What the hell do they say?! And what "return on investment" would you be getting on your precious time (which, for some reason, you believe to be worth more than mine) through a reply saying "no thanks"? And are there really really that many women and couples you're attracted to that you message? Really? I don't believe that for a minute. Anyone who is spending more than a cursory amount of time sending out speculative messages is treating it as an any hole's a goal game. This site is chock full of men and I'm not particularly picky and I still find one a month I'd actually like to meet, if that. Fuck me, 30 minutes a month messaging? Yeah I'm definitely owed a return on that investment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shows how lowly men are regarded in this day and age when analogies of junk mail and Chinese take away junk mail are being produced. You'd never think that they were actually human beings would you?" Its not just men though. I hardly ever reply to women who message me as they're not my type. I genuinly see no reason to reply to "Hi. X" Regardless of the gender who sent it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well said indeed. What the same people who demand such high standards / rules / requirements / hoop jumping, don't understand is that a simple thanks but no thanks is not only polite, but in 99% of cases will satisfy the 'applicant' ! The no reply is actually more likely to fill up tgeir inbox with follow ups and newly constructed applications for the post of sex buddy extraordinaire ! Simple courtesy please ! (" Except as has been pointed out when they say "no thanks" to you. When they decide to block men, or couples or women or people outside rhier age range etc anyone they replied to can message them regardless of filters | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If someone put this effort in then I'd reply even if it was a no thanks. It's the ones without effort I don't bother with but you can see when someone has made a genuine effort. I often get thanked for the reply and told its unusual but there's not that many that make an effort so for me it's a polite thing to do that takes little time. " . This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP I think the lesson to take from this is to not invest so much on any single profile or first contact message. Half an hour to write a message? A short paragraph or even a single sentence saying you are interested and would like to talk/meet is plenty - your profile is very clear as to what you are looking for and offer and anybody into you who'd want to know more or meet will reply, believe me. Shoot and forget! However keep a lid on your assumptions: "what we all came here to do" is really not one thing or the same thing for everyone. Nobody owes you a reply because you think you are compatible and you paid attention, and vice versa, you don't owe anybody your attention. Forget politeness, it is irrelevant. Keep your search up, concentrate on the responsive ones, hope you get some connections soon " Thank you. (don't let the lack of veris fool you. I meet just not always from this site). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not sure why such a high proportion of responses on this thread have a condescending tone. If a person less acquainted with fab asks a question in a bid to understand fab etiquette, where is the crime in that? We were all new on here at some point. No need to take fab frustrations out on the OP. If you lack the patience to explain then why bother replying at all? " Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's simply supply and demand. The ladies get swamped at the slight raise of a hem, get pissed off with it and cant do much other than switch off certain groups. (Hopefully employing other strategies as above re own searches). Nobody is really wrong here, no need to fall out either. Eventually it comes down to trying your best to have fun and a lot of luck! I do think a THANKS BUT NO THANKS Button, to quick reply with would be a good idea. Sid No it wouldn't, as then people would bitch that it's too impersonal a way to reply after they've typed out a well thought out message. I've seen it happen on the forums of another site I use that have a similar feature as the one you suggest " sounds a good idea...could change the bitching topics for fab...keeping it more alive On a more serious note. It's actually a very good idea if you step outside the whole 'no reply is not rude says FAB' rhetoric. It certainly wouldn't feel like your face has been smashed following through the door behind an ignorant person. Also it would save time...One button and it could act as a block to further replies too... This has been asked over the years though and fab obviously isn't interested in trying it out so....back to face smashing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. " Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages..." Can you not tell the difference between: - having to spend time on tedious sex site admin replying to guys that you don't ever want to meet who are likely to th and draw you into a conversation about how you're missing out before calling you a fat slag that they wouldn't fuck in a million years. - spending time doing something social that you enjoy, i.e. Writing on Internet forums, which might lead to you having sex with someone that you do like. You really can't tell the difference between those things? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages..." no. People have a difference of opinion that it isn't impolite. They aren't condoning being impolite. There's a difference. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages..." Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks." *looks up at the sky with index finger on chin and nods in contemplative agreement* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages..." When visible as I've stated, my profile is crystal clear, no ambiguity as to what I'm seeking ie single, straight, tall, 45+, local, sexually submissive, white men. I even add I will not respond to anyone outwith what I'm looking for. Are you seriously telling me if I receive a "well thought out" message from a married, bisexual, dwarf, 39 years old black Dom living in Timbukto I should reply?!! Yeah...right!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks." What a load of sanctimonious shite. Seriously, get over it. This "woe is me, no one sends me polite messages telling me the reasons why they aren't attracted to me" stuff is deeply unattractive. And it's even more unattractive being told the people choosing not to reply (for whatever reason they see fit) are impolite, having cold sex, and lack manners and courtesy or have been badly brought up. As for spending time writing posts on the forum, that's because I want to. I don't want to spend time writing replies to those I'm not interested in. I don't particularly care if I might hurt their little feelings by not doing so, because I'm not attracted to men who would get so butthurt over such a minor thing. And the OP never came back on my questions about why in gods name he was spending so long messaging people anyway. There are not that many women and couples. There are not that many you actually find attractive, there just aren't. If hours of your life are taken up sending messages then all that says to me is that you're messaging anyone you think you might have a chance with, which makes me even less inclined to want to reply. Mmm, desperation, that's sexy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks. What a load of sanctimonious shite. Seriously, get over it. This "woe is me, no one sends me polite messages telling me the reasons why they aren't attracted to me" stuff is deeply unattractive. And it's even more unattractive being told the people choosing not to reply (for whatever reason they see fit) are impolite, having cold sex, and lack manners and courtesy or have been badly brought up. As for spending time writing posts on the forum, that's because I want to. I don't want to spend time writing replies to those I'm not interested in. I don't particularly care if I might hurt their little feelings by not doing so, because I'm not attracted to men who would get so butthurt over such a minor thing. And the OP never came back on my questions about why in gods name he was spending so long messaging people anyway. There are not that many women and couples. There are not that many you actually find attractive, there just aren't. If hours of your life are taken up sending messages then all that says to me is that you're messaging anyone you think you might have a chance with, which makes me even less inclined to want to reply. Mmm, desperation, that's sexy. " Not like you to be so restrained and sit on the fence Ruby, tell us what you really think! Joking aside, spot on! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks. What a load of sanctimonious shite. Seriously, get over it. This "woe is me, no one sends me polite messages telling me the reasons why they aren't attracted to me" stuff is deeply unattractive. And it's even more unattractive being told the people choosing not to reply (for whatever reason they see fit) are impolite, having cold sex, and lack manners and courtesy or have been badly brought up. As for spending time writing posts on the forum, that's because I want to. I don't want to spend time writing replies to those I'm not interested in. I don't particularly care if I might hurt their little feelings by not doing so, because I'm not attracted to men who would get so butthurt over such a minor thing. And the OP never came back on my questions about why in gods name he was spending so long messaging people anyway. There are not that many women and couples. There are not that many you actually find attractive, there just aren't. If hours of your life are taken up sending messages then all that says to me is that you're messaging anyone you think you might have a chance with, which makes me even less inclined to want to reply. Mmm, desperation, that's sexy. " Think you illustrated one of my points. Your lengthy response here obviously touched a nerve as you vent for defensive response and secondly the time spent at it could have been the same time spent sending 30 or 50 polite thanks but no thank you. Most single guys would accept that. It's not the majority as often implied that don't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks. What a load of sanctimonious shite. Seriously, get over it. This "woe is me, no one sends me polite messages telling me the reasons why they aren't attracted to me" stuff is deeply unattractive. And it's even more unattractive being told the people choosing not to reply (for whatever reason they see fit) are impolite, having cold sex, and lack manners and courtesy or have been badly brought up. As for spending time writing posts on the forum, that's because I want to. I don't want to spend time writing replies to those I'm not interested in. I don't particularly care if I might hurt their little feelings by not doing so, because I'm not attracted to men who would get so butthurt over such a minor thing. And the OP never came back on my questions about why in gods name he was spending so long messaging people anyway. There are not that many women and couples. There are not that many you actually find attractive, there just aren't. If hours of your life are taken up sending messages then all that says to me is that you're messaging anyone you think you might have a chance with, which makes me even less inclined to want to reply. Mmm, desperation, that's sexy. Think you illustrated one of my points. Your lengthy response here obviously touched a nerve as you vent for defensive response and secondly the time spent at it could have been the same time spent sending 30 or 50 polite thanks but no thank you. Most single guys would accept that. It's not the majority as often implied that don't. " Definitely not sanctimonious....Just a commonly seen attribute on fab by some. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks. What a load of sanctimonious shite. Seriously, get over it. This "woe is me, no one sends me polite messages telling me the reasons why they aren't attracted to me" stuff is deeply unattractive. And it's even more unattractive being told the people choosing not to reply (for whatever reason they see fit) are impolite, having cold sex, and lack manners and courtesy or have been badly brought up. As for spending time writing posts on the forum, that's because I want to. I don't want to spend time writing replies to those I'm not interested in. I don't particularly care if I might hurt their little feelings by not doing so, because I'm not attracted to men who would get so butthurt over such a minor thing. And the OP never came back on my questions about why in gods name he was spending so long messaging people anyway. There are not that many women and couples. There are not that many you actually find attractive, there just aren't. If hours of your life are taken up sending messages then all that says to me is that you're messaging anyone you think you might have a chance with, which makes me even less inclined to want to reply. Mmm, desperation, that's sexy. Think you illustrated one of my points. Your lengthy response here obviously touched a nerve as you vent for defensive response and secondly the time spent at it could have been the same time spent sending 30 or 50 polite thanks but no thank you. Most single guys would accept that. It's not the majority as often implied that don't. " I'd love to you reply to my post above. Thanks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reading all those against a simple no thank you reply because it takes up so much of their precious time yet some have written numerous paragraphs on here in a response. ...wow. This I find is quite common across fab...some are keyboard warriors who can't be arsed me thinks.. Quite hilarious is it not? Instead of being objective about the issue they choose to cast negative and unfounded aspersions about a persons experience on fab. The mind actually boggles (it literally does this ) to think that people are condoning being impolite when it comes to something as personal and intimate as sexual intercourse. And again for the record I am not referring to the wanna fuck now messages... Maybe it's just cold sex. Maybe it's different on fab but in life the way one talks and responds illustrates their nature. I think that's where people get it mixed up. For some fab is real life...For some it's fantasy...For others it's denial....Each are different and each will have different responses. We all, new and old timers sometimes forget that. I sometimes wonder though how some find the transition back into real life where most expect courtesy. I guess one can always learn new tricks. What a load of sanctimonious shite. Seriously, get over it. This "woe is me, no one sends me polite messages telling me the reasons why they aren't attracted to me" stuff is deeply unattractive. And it's even more unattractive being told the people choosing not to reply (for whatever reason they see fit) are impolite, having cold sex, and lack manners and courtesy or have been badly brought up. As for spending time writing posts on the forum, that's because I want to. I don't want to spend time writing replies to those I'm not interested in. I don't particularly care if I might hurt their little feelings by not doing so, because I'm not attracted to men who would get so butthurt over such a minor thing. And the OP never came back on my questions about why in gods name he was spending so long messaging people anyway. There are not that many women and couples. There are not that many you actually find attractive, there just aren't. If hours of your life are taken up sending messages then all that says to me is that you're messaging anyone you think you might have a chance with, which makes me even less inclined to want to reply. Mmm, desperation, that's sexy. Think you illustrated one of my points. Your lengthy response here obviously touched a nerve as you vent for defensive response and secondly the time spent at it could have been the same time spent sending 30 or 50 polite thanks but no thank you. Most single guys would accept that. It's not the majority as often implied that don't. " I didn't illustrate your point at all because I've never claimed I "don't have time" to answer messages or that I don't reply because get abusive responses to them. I don't answer messages from those I'm not interested in because I don't want to. There is nothing more to it than that. I'm not defensive, I just think you are completely wrong and isn't the point of a forum to discuss ideas? What was I supposed to do, just roll over and go "oh yes, you've made such a powerful and convincing argument that I will definitely answer all my messages from now on?" No one has yet given me a convincing case about why logging in to an empty mailbox is worse than logging in to a string of "thanks but no" messages. I treat others as I'd like to be treated and that's by not having my time wasted reading messages telling me they're not interested in me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them." Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And if I've chosen not to reply Ruby and Interupted am I being polite or lazy? That I haven't responded and you've both brought up the fact that I haven't sound like you both a bit...erm what the phrase?...butthurt by it? But fear not a response is forthcoming " I'm not sure you understand the difference between a mailbox and a forum thread in that case. But I'm waiting with bated breath, obviously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So do we know why it's better to have an inbox full of no thank yous yet? ...just wondering..." Sadly not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy." I was wondering that very question about the time spent in attactive responses on forums. Though it be better to plan meets. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So do we know why it's better to have an inbox full of no thank yous yet? ...just wondering... Sadly not. " Maybe ask in a new post for guys.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy." Odd. The post you're replying to, and the opening post, don't specifically target women. In fact, I struggle to see any gender bias in those posts save for the genders of the posters themselves. Care to explain why you think the comment applies to women only? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's simply supply and demand. The ladies get swamped at the slight raise of a hem, get pissed off with it and cant do much other than switch off certain groups. (Hopefully employing other strategies as above re own searches). Nobody is really wrong here, no need to fall out either. Eventually it comes down to trying your best to have fun and a lot of luck! I do think a THANKS BUT NO THANKS Button, to quick reply with would be a good idea. Sid No it wouldn't, as then people would bitch that it's too impersonal a way to reply after they've typed out a well thought out message. I've seen it happen on the forums of another site I use that have a similar feature as the one you suggest sounds a good idea...could change the bitching topics for fab...keeping it more alive On a more serious note. It's actually a very good idea if you step outside the whole 'no reply is not rude says FAB' rhetoric. It certainly wouldn't feel like your face has been smashed following through the door behind an ignorant person. Also it would save time...One button and it could act as a block to further replies too... This has been asked over the years though and fab obviously isn't interested in trying it out so....back to face smashing " Or they know people will still moan so it's a case of damned if you do damned if you don't. Given it's a free site and upgrades are only voluntary funds to implement new changes are limited much better to spend that money elsewhere than on a system that will still get bitched about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy. I was wondering that very question about the time spent in attactive responses on forums. Though it be better to plan meets." I'm glad this guy has it covered on the "how women should spend their time" front! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy. I was wondering that very question about the time spent in attactive responses on forums. Though it be better to plan meets." Most do both spends their time in the forums and plan meets with people that match what their looking for and don't waste time on the ones that don't, surely you can see that's the point you're debating against | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy. Odd. The post you're replying to, and the opening post, don't specifically target women. In fact, I struggle to see any gender bias in those posts save for the genders of the posters themselves. Care to explain why you think the comment applies to women only?" It's defensive rhetoric and maybe repeated, and becomes lost in translation over the years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So do we know why it's better to have an inbox full of no thank yous yet? ...just wondering... Sadly not. Maybe ask in a new post for guys.." I was asking to see if their was a valid reason as to why we should feel compelled to reply to all messages. That is in the context of this thread and I'm not interested enough to start my own unnecessary thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy. I was wondering that very question about the time spent in attactive responses on forums. Though it be better to plan meets. Most do both spends their time in the forums and plan meets with people that match what their looking for and don't waste time on the ones that don't, surely you can see that's the point you're debating against " I have a number of meets planned for February. Spending time arguing with people in the forums hasn't stopped me doing that. I've even had some messages deleted without reply during that time too, which was devastating, obviously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So do we know why it's better to have an inbox full of no thank yous yet? ...just wondering... Sadly not. Maybe ask in a new post for guys.. I was asking to see if their was a valid reason as to why we should feel compelled to reply to all messages. That is in the context of this thread and I'm not interested enough to start my own unnecessary thread. " Because someone has decided, against the common consensus, it is the polite thing to do. Have you even read the thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So do we know why it's better to have an inbox full of no thank yous yet? ...just wondering... Sadly not. Maybe ask in a new post for guys.. I was asking to see if their was a valid reason as to why we should feel compelled to reply to all messages. That is in the context of this thread and I'm not interested enough to start my own unnecessary thread. " No one is compelled to do anything... I don't see where the OP stated that... different points were being made by different people. Some good suggestions as to help the situation... Just as with good points to help the over run inbox. 1. Suggestion...Take on board different views rather than attactive responses that many have done. Openness is a good thing. Now back to sex... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's too many messages to respond to. No response = no thank you. Don't be offended, you didn't do anything wrong. Just be concerned with your replies. It's that simple. " I agree, I think some to my replies the wrong way and personalised them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its the Fab version of walking through a door and not being bothered to look over your shoulder to see if someones about to have the door slam into their face..." what is it with me and doors lmao | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy. I was wondering that very question about the time spent in attactive responses on forums. Though it be better to plan meets. Most do both spends their time in the forums and plan meets with people that match what their looking for and don't waste time on the ones that don't, surely you can see that's the point you're debating against " I agree with you....I just thought it funny how multiple 3 minute attacking resonses on a forum which they probably would have been best not entering took precedent over a 2 second no thank you to someone looking for what they too are looking for....sex.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its the Fab version of walking through a door and not being bothered to look over your shoulder to see if someones about to have the door slam into their face...what is it with me and doors lmao" I gotta stop chasing disused parked cars...flat faced every time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Some have now taken it all personal and become defensively offensive. It's sad one can't see others can have a different view without it being personal and attack them. Nothing personal here. Just wondering why you think women here should spend time doing something they don't enjoy instead of something they do enjoy. I was wondering that very question about the time spent in attactive responses on forums. Though it be better to plan meets. Most do both spends their time in the forums and plan meets with people that match what their looking for and don't waste time on the ones that don't, surely you can see that's the point you're debating against I agree with you....I just thought it funny how multiple 3 minute attacking resonses on a forum which they probably would have been best not entering took precedent over a 2 second no thank you to someone looking for what they too are looking for....sex.. " A) my responses don't take 3 minutes B) I like posting on the forum, I don't like "polite" inbox admin C) even if I did, I have no messages to reply to D) so why are you posting here instead of focusing on messaging women for sex? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There's too many messages to respond to. No response = no thank you. Don't be offended, you didn't do anything wrong. Just be concerned with your replies. It's that simple. I agree, I think some to my replies the wrong way and personalised them." Nobody personalised them. I'm this argumentative and belligerent with everyone who is making a useless case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its the Fab version of walking through a door and not being bothered to look over your shoulder to see if someones about to have the door slam into their face...what is it with me and doors lmao " No, it's the Fab version of people seemingly thinking it's better to walk through the door, check out who is following you through it, and if you're not attracted to them saying "thanks but no" and THEN letting the door shut in their face. Apparently that's better. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This topic comes up multiple times a day. I've heard every argument possible and I still can't understand why people get so butthurt about it." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Basically, if you're getting shitted off over a no reply, then you're not the guy for me anyway... " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I did a bulk delete last night This morning I've got 37 new messages all asking me if I'd like to meet at some point today. Anyone care to read my profile and tell me their mistake? Then Tell me why they would be justified a 'polite' no thanks? " untick that you're looking for men and you won't show up on their searches. Not a filter and it won't make them read your profile or searching in other ways but we find it helps... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |