FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Squirting or Gushing
Squirting or Gushing
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
"And is gush just piss?" And is squirting just piss? | |||
| |||
| |||
"Both the same just different way of delivery but an expert hand can determine which way when required!!" Like milking a cow  | |||
| |||
"not sure. i do gush and squirt the same amount of small but extra fluid, but heard some people can squirt loads of fluid. squirt shoots out of you i think." Yes - I played with a woman a couple of years ago - Jesus she squirted about 3 foot in the air, it pumped out of her Poor lady was exhausted after our sessions lol Other lady's I've played with I'd say gushed as it's more of a.spray than a jet of liquid Both are erotic as Hell when it happens  | |||
| |||
"Both the same just different way of delivery but an expert hand can determine which way when required!!" Not true. A gush is totally different and comes from deep inside... I rarely squirt but gush with my partner.. | |||
"French scientists did a study and it was piss, each one of them is a form of watersport. " they examined a very small amount of women and said there were traces of urine.. not that it was piss | |||
"And is gush just piss?" 
Both are piss | |||
"French scientists did a study and it was piss, each one of them is a form of watersport. they examined a very small amount of women and said there were traces of urine.. not that it was piss " That is right too, but noone can cum so much, so it is a mixture of it. | |||
| |||
"French scientists did a study and it was piss, each one of them is a form of watersport. they examined a very small amount of women and said there were traces of urine.. not that it was piss That is right too, but noone can cum so much, so it is a mixture of it." dunno, someone yesterday said she squirts a lot and went to the dr and they said they'd have to remove her glands that secrete vaginal lubricants to stop that. | |||
"No they are different but I only know from someone filming me so I have my own proof. Squirts kind of more white like cum looking, gush well its just very wet and not pee coloured." I can agree with that. I think a lot of the porn squirting is pee, but I was with a woman 3 yesrs ago that was kneeling over me while I was fingering her G spot and it was pouing from her. It was coming from just inside the vagina, was totally clear and was quite sweet tasting. We went through 5 towels that night and a very wet bed in the morning. I ended up fingering her stood in the bath and she was still gushing. A woman I will never forget. | |||
"French scientists did a study and it was piss, each one of them is a form of watersport. they examined a very small amount of women and said there were traces of urine.. not that it was piss That is right too, but noone can cum so much, so it is a mixture of it." Why i can cry or snot loads... and the glands that secrete natural lubricants are similar to the tear duct.. i know its not pee when i gush as it stays inside me and my partner can feel it gush down his cock while he is inside me.... You do not pee from inside your vagina.  | |||
"French scientists did a study and it was piss, each one of them is a form of watersport. they examined a very small amount of women and said there were traces of urine.. not that it was piss That is right too, but noone can cum so much, so it is a mixture of it. Why i can cry or snot loads... and the glands that secrete natural lubricants are similar to the tear duct.. i know its not pee when i gush as it stays inside me and my partner can feel it gush down his cock while he is inside me.... You do not pee from inside your vagina. "The lady I mentioned above also liked watersports I tasted both, saw both and I'm convinced it's not pee as they are also not the same colour.. Deffinately two different liquids coming out of one person What fun we had... | |||
| |||
| |||
"No they are different but I only know from someone filming me so I have my own proof. Squirts kind of more white like cum looking, gush well its just very wet and not pee coloured. I can agree with that. I think a lot of the porn squirting is pee, but I was with a woman 3 yesrs ago that was kneeling over me while I was fingering her G spot and it was pouing from her. It was coming from just inside the vagina, was totally clear and was quite sweet tasting. We went through 5 towels that night and a very wet bed in the morning. I ended up fingering her stood in the bath and she was still gushing. A woman I will never forget." | |||
"No they are different but I only know from someone filming me so I have my own proof. Squirts kind of more white like cum looking, gush well its just very wet and not pee coloured. I can agree with that. I think a lot of the porn squirting is pee, but I was with a woman 3 yesrs ago that was kneeling over me while I was fingering her G spot and it was pouing from her. It was coming from just inside the vagina, was totally clear and was quite sweet tasting. We went through 5 towels that night and a very wet bed in the morning. I ended up fingering her stood in the bath and she was still gushing. A woman I will never forget." | |||
"French scientists did a study and it was piss, each one of them is a form of watersport. they examined a very small amount of women and said there were traces of urine.. not that it was piss That is right too, but noone can cum so much, so it is a mixture of it. Why i can cry or snot loads... and the glands that secrete natural lubricants are similar to the tear duct.. i know its not pee when i gush as it stays inside me and my partner can feel it gush down his cock while he is inside me.... You do not pee from inside your vagina.
The lady I mentioned above also liked watersports
I tasted both, saw both and I'm convinced it's not pee as they are also not the same colour..
Deffinately two different liquids coming out of one person
What fun we had... "it was doing watersports with someone who could make me squirt is how i noticed the difference as well. | |||
"No they are different but I only know from someone filming me so I have my own proof. Squirts kind of more white like cum looking, gush well its just very wet and not pee coloured. I can agree with that. I think a lot of the porn squirting is pee, but I was with a woman 3 yesrs ago that was kneeling over me while I was fingering her G spot and it was pouing from her. It was coming from just inside the vagina, was totally clear and was quite sweet tasting. We went through 5 towels that night and a very wet bed in the morning. I ended up fingering her stood in the bath and she was still gushing. A woman I will never forget." Wrecked a few mattress's and socked a few duvets, I now have a travelling shower curtain that goes with me to meets. | |||
"No they are different but I only know from someone filming me so I have my own proof. Squirts kind of more white like cum looking, gush well its just very wet and not pee coloured. I can agree with that. I think a lot of the porn squirting is pee, but I was with a woman 3 yesrs ago that was kneeling over me while I was fingering her G spot and it was pouing from her. It was coming from just inside the vagina, was totally clear and was quite sweet tasting. We went through 5 towels that night and a very wet bed in the morning. I ended up fingering her stood in the bath and she was still gushing. A woman I will never forget. Wrecked a few mattress's and socked a few duvets, I now have a travelling shower curtain that goes with me to meets. " Could have done with that that night | |||
| |||
| |||
"Feels bloody good I know that x" And that's all that matters. .  | |||
| |||
| |||
Some men enjoy the sensation as it's a very visual and 'sense' experience where you can see end results.
Other men don't.
Some ladies can do it, some can't and some ladies enjoy the experience and satisfaction whereas others are embarrassed by it.
No right or wrong.
If you don't like it?
Don't do it.
You are experiencing being covered in 'bodily fluids' so who cares what biologically this is.
Enjoy it and then just shower afterwards 
I personally do like it, but it doesn't matter in the slightest if I'm with a lady and it doesn't happen.
Each experience is different, each experience should be fun.  | |||
"What difference does it actually make? As everyone likes and enjoys different experiences.
Some men enjoy the sensation as it's a very visual and 'sense' experience where you can see end results.
Other men don't.
Some ladies can do it, some can't and some ladies enjoy the experience and satisfaction whereas others are embarrassed by it.
No right or wrong.
If you don't like it?
Don't do it.
You are experiencing being covered in 'bodily fluids' so who cares what biologically this is.
Enjoy it and then just shower afterwards
I personally do like it, but it doesn't matter in the slightest if I'm with a lady and it doesn't happen.
Each experience is different, each experience should be fun. " | |||
| |||
"Ahhhh, the ongoing perpetual debate about squirting/gushing lol. Here's my spin on this.... The people who can't squirt or dislike squirting call it piss. Those that can and enjoy squirting actually know for a fact it's NOT piss. There will be a small trace of urine on the first few goes BUT that's because of the urethra sharing the same outlet. It's liquid but without the urine in it, so it boils down to is it only piss if there is urine in it or not? Gushing comes from the vagina itself and not connected to the urethra/bladder. L can squirt/gush and we both love it BUT in no way would either of us entertain golden showers. Horses for courses I suppose x" And that's exactly why I won't list watersports | |||
"And is gush just piss?" No it is not always, taste and find out! | |||
"Just a question.....are they the same thing ?" Well I do think there the same just different amounts based off how much the g spot is stimulated. From experiences the only person who I've had gush was my ex of 10 years, I think it had alot to do with it being the first time (alot of women will not release for fear of peeing, although it's 100% not pee). Since my ex gushed, she has only squirted since. Make sure any woman has a bottle of water to hand! In fact last nyt I told a woman to make sure to go toilet before playing bcos I didn't want her to worry on build up, I had a play and asked her why she was flinching and if she needed to pee, she said yes, I told her not to worry and it's normal...she gave a good payload I love it! | |||
 | |||
| |||
 | |||
"I squirted / gushed during play for the first time last week ... previously only once when playing alone Completely empty bladder so I know it wasn't piss lol was a strange feeling lol Was pure white bed sheets that stayed pure white so know it def wasn't peeing myself haha Have seen a few pics on here where it has a yellow tinge so that could be piss but yes can confirm squirting / gushing is very different "i have a fantasy of being squirted/gushed on while the women in straddling over me and letting lose all over my body and face, i would let you do it, you are beautiful | |||
"not sure. i do gush and squirt the same amount of small but extra fluid, but heard some people can squirt loads of fluid. squirt shoots out of you i think." 100%correct | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"[Bed sheet removed by poster at 12/01/17 18:12:39]" | |||
"I am a big gusher and squirter .. and I know it's not piss becomes it comes from a gland inside my vagina and not from my urethra which is where I pee from. It's clear fluid.. and very sweet smelling and tasting. " i wish i lived near you, i worked in Gravesend couple of years back before i was a swinger  | |||
"I am a big gusher and squirter .. and I know it's not piss becomes it comes from a gland inside my vagina and not from my urethra which is where I pee from. It's clear fluid.. and very sweet smelling and tasting. " This | |||
| |||
"I once met a woman who could do it on demand, must have happened like 6 times in the space of 2 hours" I have no control over mine happening... and I have never met anyone able to get me to a point where I cant do it anymore. | |||
"I once met a woman who could do it on demand, must have happened like 6 times in the space of 2 hours I have no control over mine happening... and I have never met anyone able to get me to a point where I cant do it anymore. " Love this | |||
"[Bed sheet removed & laundered by poster at 12/01/17 18:12:39]" | |||
| |||
 he certainly wasn't complaining! I have now master making myself gush in solo play with toys. | |||
"I am a gusher and more than once have I gushed on mr SnT face he certainly wasn't complaining! I have now master making myself gush in solo play with toys. "i would love for you to gush on my face | |||
"I once met a woman who could do it on demand, must have happened like 6 times in the space of 2 hours I have no control over mine happening... and I have never met anyone able to get me to a point where I cant do it anymore. " Same here | |||
| |||
"And is gush just piss?"
Yes. It's weeeeeeeeee | |||
"I am a gusher and more than once have I gushed on mr SnT face he certainly wasn't complaining! I have now master making myself gush in solo play with toys. "Love to be gushed on. | |||
"I am a big gusher and squirter .. and I know it's not piss becomes it comes from a gland inside my vagina and not from my urethra which is where I pee from. It's clear fluid.. and very sweet smelling and tasting. This " | |||
"I am a big gusher and squirter .. and I know it's not piss becomes it comes from a gland inside my vagina and not from my urethra which is where I pee from. It's clear fluid.. and very sweet smelling and tasting. " | |||
"I am a big gusher and squirter .. and I know it's not piss becomes it comes from a gland inside my vagina and not from my urethra which is where I pee from. It's clear fluid.. and very sweet smelling and tasting. " | |||
"I once met a woman who could do it on demand, must have happened like 6 times in the space of 2 hours I have no control over mine happening... and I have never met anyone able to get me to a point where I cant do it anymore. " That's the horniest reply I have read,yet I don't think it's meant to be. | |||
| |||
"my gush isn't piss, it only happens when i cum or about to and comes outta my vagina." I agree mine isn't pee either. If guys doesn't like it avoid specific girlies. X | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting "It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from. | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from."How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive "can't post a link but i'm getting good at finding info. this is not my own sidney university research btw.
The G-Spot and Female Ejaculation
Before Perry and Whipple, other researcher studied the urethral sponge, not for its erotic potential, but because they were interested in the gland around it, the paraurethral glands, tiny fluid-producing structures located around the female urethra. The first two were discovered by Alexander Skene in the 1880's and are called Skene’s glands. Since then, several others have been identified. The arrangement of these glands, and the fact that they produced fluid suggested the male prostate, and some anatomists began calling the urethral sponge the “female prostate.” Recent research has strengthened the case that the paraurethral glands are, in fact, the female analog of the prostate.
Perry and Whipple incorporated this into their book, saying that when a woman is highly sexually aroused, with an aroused G-spot, the paraurethral glands secrete fluid that emerges on orgasm as “female ejaculation.” (I posted a blog about female ejaculation on January 2, 2014. See the archive.)
Urination on Orgasm?
This observation seemed to explain a good deal of sexual history. Writers dating back to the first-century Roman physician, Galen, had remarked that women produce a "thin" fluid that "manifestly flows when they experience the greatest pleasure in coitus." The ancient Indian Kama Sutra and centuries-old Japanese erotic works also mention fluid issuing from women during sexual arousal.
But both Alfred Kinsey, the first modern American sex researcher who published in the 1950s, and Masters and Johnson, the researchers who invented sex therapy in the 1960s, rejected the notion of female ejaculation, saying that some women simply produced a great deal of vaginal lubrication.
However, vaginal lubrication does not squirt out during orgasm. Many women notice that they release fluid this way—and often feel embarrassed that they “urinate” during orgasm. Many women ejaculators have examined their fluid and determined by color and odor that it is not urine. The research confirms this.
Not Urine
Female ejaculatory fluid is not urine, but mainly secretions from the paraurethral glands with a little dilute urine mixed in. Some researchers say it's most similar to the prostatic fluid that accounts for most of the fluid in semen.
Normal and Safe
How many women ejaculate? Depending on the survey, somewhere between 10 and 50 percent. But the amount of fluid released varies considerably from a few drops to much more.
It is perfectly safe for women to ejaculate. You may have to change the sheets or make love on a towel, but no harm has ever been associated with female ejaculation. In fact, one study suggests that women who ejaculate may enjoy some protection from bladder infections, presumably because ejaculation helps expel bacteria from the urethra.
It's also perfectly normal not to ejaculate. Many women do not. If you don't but would like to, try extended foreplay with lots of deep G-spot massage.
Why do some women ejaculate while others do not? No one knows. But the process seems to be related to G-spot sensitivity. Women with sexually sensitive G-spots are the ones most likely to ejaculate. This makes physiological sense because the nerves that excite the clitoris also run along the sides of the vagina and cover the area around the G-spot, which includes the paraurethral glands.
brb, there's more. | |||
| |||
| |||
I'll stick the usual one up from 2015 that while small is the only thorough study so far using modern methods.... | |||
| |||
"Moalem S1, Reidenberg JS. Author information Abstract Women have glandular tissue below the bladder and surrounding the urethra that appears to be homologous to the male prostate. This tissue (also called "female prostate" or Skene's glands) appears to the source of a viscous, white secretion, which exits from the urethra upon sexual stimulation in some women. Analysis of this secretion (also known as "female ejaculate"), and comparison with pre-coital urine from the same women, revealed that its composition was unlike urine and often contained components also found in male seminal fluid (minus the sperm). The female ejaculate had lower levels of creatinine, but had elevated levels of prostate specific antigen, prostatic acidic phosphatase, prostate specific acid phosphatase, and glucose. The functional importance of female ejaculate has yet to be fully elucidated. It is possible that retention of a prostatic tissue homolog and its glandular secretion in women is merely a vestige of development and differentiation from an embryonic, gender-neutral body plan. We hypothesize that female ejaculation has a unique function in producing a secretion into the urethra that provides protection from urinary tract infections (UTIs). We further predict that female ejaculate contains antimicrobial compounds including elements such as zinc. We also hypothesize that retention of prostatic tissue and an ability to ejaculate its glandular secretion were maintained in women because these traits provided an evolutionary advantage. Specifically: (1) women who could ejaculate antimicrobial secretions into the urethra were less likely to suffer UTIs (particularly coitus-induced UTIs), (2) women without UTIs were more likely to be receptive to coitus at a greater frequency, (3) women engaging in frequent coitus were more likely to become pregnant, and (4) women who became pregnant often were more likely to successfully reproduce the species." --
But I will admit...
Lots of big words to read through late on a Friday.
I might have to try and understand it a little bit more tomorrow once I have slept.
xxx | |||
Nowt wrong with that if that's what you're into. | |||
"You don't need to go searching - all this stuff is already copy and pasted on all the other topics. Which all eventually conclude that the only credible study undertaken so far determined that it's definitely mostly wee. " It is urine | |||
"Moalem S1, Reidenberg JS. Author information Abstract Women have glandular tissue below the bladder and surrounding the urethra that appears to be homologous to the male prostate. This tissue (also called "female prostate" or Skene's glands) appears to the source of a viscous, white secretion, which exits from the urethra upon sexual stimulation in some women. Analysis of this secretion (also known as "female ejaculate"), and comparison with pre-coital urine from the same women, revealed that its composition was unlike urine and often contained components also found in male seminal fluid (minus the sperm). The female ejaculate had lower levels of creatinine, but had elevated levels of prostate specific antigen, prostatic acidic phosphatase, prostate specific acid phosphatase, and glucose. The functional importance of female ejaculate has yet to be fully elucidated. It is possible that retention of a prostatic tissue homolog and its glandular secretion in women is merely a vestige of development and differentiation from an embryonic, gender-neutral body plan. We hypothesize that female ejaculation has a unique function in producing a secretion into the urethra that provides protection from urinary tract infections (UTIs). We further predict that female ejaculate contains antimicrobial compounds including elements such as zinc. We also hypothesize that retention of prostatic tissue and an ability to ejaculate its glandular secretion were maintained in women because these traits provided an evolutionary advantage. Specifically: (1) women who could ejaculate antimicrobial secretions into the urethra were less likely to suffer UTIs (particularly coitus-induced UTIs), (2) women without UTIs were more likely to be receptive to coitus at a greater frequency, (3) women engaging in frequent coitus were more likely to become pregnant, and (4) women who became pregnant often were more likely to successfully reproduce the species." OK miss Wikipedia | |||
| |||
"
But I will admit...
Lots of big words to read through late on a Friday.
I might have to try and understand it a little bit more tomorrow once I have slept.
xxx"not that many big words, they're just words you wouldn't use in every day conversation. i'm brain dead as well lol but i do read this stuff before i post it so i know i'm not posting any old crap. | |||
"You don't need to go searching - all this stuff is already copy and pasted on all the other topics. Which all eventually conclude that the only credible study undertaken so far determined that it's definitely mostly wee. It is urine "
(they'll still deny it) | |||
"You don't need to go searching - all this stuff is already copy and pasted on all the other topics. Which all eventually conclude that the only credible study undertaken so far determined that it's definitely mostly wee. It is urine
(they'll still deny it)"Then they are dillusional | |||
| |||
 
The summary I provided is adequate. If people want the full paper I'm sure they're as capable of using google as anyone else.
Bottom line - the MOST recent, credible study concluded.... it is weeeeeee | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive "I can't prove it to you. But can you explain a few things to me? * Woman on top, gush comes out as the penis is removed - how did that liquid get from the urethra to inside the vagina against gravity? * A gush is clear and doesn't smell of urine. How does the urine become normal coloured and normal smell again immediately after after sex if the bladder has just been emptied of a colourless non-smelling liquid? * Why do so many women who do gush say that it isn't pee, do they not know their bodies? Several women on this thread have already said that gushing does not come from their urethra - are they lying or just anatomically challenged? | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive
I can't prove it to you. But can you explain a few things to me?
* Woman on top, gush comes out as the penis is removed - how did that liquid get from the urethra to inside the vagina against gravity?
* A gush is clear and doesn't smell of urine. How does the urine become normal coloured and normal smell again immediately after after sex if the bladder has just been emptied of a colourless non-smelling liquid?
* Why do so many women who do gush say that it isn't pee, do they not know their bodies? Several women on this thread have already said that gushing does not come from their urethra - are they lying or just anatomically challenged?"1. If the fanny damn method worked as proof why haven't medical studies done this? 2. Piss is clear from a hydrated person! 3. How much are you aware of at orgasm? | |||
"Well you clearly don't! Have a look back at what you quoted and where it's from
The summary I provided is adequate. If people want the full paper I'm sure they're as capable of using google as anyone else.
Bottom line - the MOST recent, credible study concluded.... it is weeeeeee "Wimpissinger is a genuine urologist, just an unfotunate name that's all. | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive
I can't prove it to you. But can you explain a few things to me?
* Woman on top, gush comes out as the penis is removed - how did that liquid get from the urethra to inside the vagina against gravity?
* A gush is clear and doesn't smell of urine. How does the urine become normal coloured and normal smell again immediately after after sex if the bladder has just been emptied of a colourless non-smelling liquid?
* Why do so many women who do gush say that it isn't pee, do they not know their bodies? Several women on this thread have already said that gushing does not come from their urethra - are they lying or just anatomically challenged?
1. If the fanny damn method worked as proof why haven't medical studies done this?
2. Piss is clear from a hydrated person!
3. How much are you aware of at orgasm?"1. Whether it's been looked at scientifically or not it happens. 2. Certainly piss can be clear - how does it miracously become coloured within 5 minutes of sex if just previously it was coloured? Do only well hydrated women gush? 3. Gushing is very different from orgasm. | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive
I can't prove it to you. But can you explain a few things to me?
* Woman on top, gush comes out as the penis is removed - how did that liquid get from the urethra to inside the vagina against gravity?
* A gush is clear and doesn't smell of urine. How does the urine become normal coloured and normal smell again immediately after after sex if the bladder has just been emptied of a colourless non-smelling liquid?
* Why do so many women who do gush say that it isn't pee, do they not know their bodies? Several women on this thread have already said that gushing does not come from their urethra - are they lying or just anatomically challenged?"We are obviously sex goddesses with magical vaginas who have never felt any sexual shame at any point in our lives so they are trying to give us a taste of what that is like. | |||
| |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive
I can't prove it to you. But can you explain a few things to me?
* Woman on top, gush comes out as the penis is removed - how did that liquid get from the urethra to inside the vagina against gravity?
* A gush is clear and doesn't smell of urine. How does the urine become normal coloured and normal smell again immediately after after sex if the bladder has just been emptied of a colourless non-smelling liquid?
* Why do so many women who do gush say that it isn't pee, do they not know their bodies? Several women on this thread have already said that gushing does not come from their urethra - are they lying or just anatomically challenged?
We are obviously sex goddesses with magical vaginas who have never felt any sexual shame at any point in our lives so they are trying to give us a taste of what that is like." | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive
I can't prove it to you. But can you explain a few things to me?
* Woman on top, gush comes out as the penis is removed - how did that liquid get from the urethra to inside the vagina against gravity?
* A gush is clear and doesn't smell of urine. How does the urine become normal coloured and normal smell again immediately after after sex if the bladder has just been emptied of a colourless non-smelling liquid?
* Why do so many women who do gush say that it isn't pee, do they not know their bodies? Several women on this thread have already said that gushing does not come from their urethra - are they lying or just anatomically challenged?
1. If the fanny damn method worked as proof why haven't medical studies done this?
2. Piss is clear from a hydrated person!
3. How much are you aware of at orgasm?
1. Whether it's been looked at scientifically or not it happens.
2. Certainly piss can be clear - how does it miracously become coloured within 5 minutes of sex if just previously it was coloured? Do only well hydrated women gush?
3. Gushing is very different from orgasm.
"I'll just refer you back to the study - ultrasound and all that... and it's piss. I'm interested in how you'd know what gushing feels like though. Was it like a satisfying pee? | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive
I can't prove it to you. But can you explain a few things to me?
* Woman on top, gush comes out as the penis is removed - how did that liquid get from the urethra to inside the vagina against gravity?
* A gush is clear and doesn't smell of urine. How does the urine become normal coloured and normal smell again immediately after after sex if the bladder has just been emptied of a colourless non-smelling liquid?
* Why do so many women who do gush say that it isn't pee, do they not know their bodies? Several women on this thread have already said that gushing does not come from their urethra - are they lying or just anatomically challenged?
1. If the fanny damn method worked as proof why haven't medical studies done this?
2. Piss is clear from a hydrated person!
3. How much are you aware of at orgasm?
1. Whether it's been looked at scientifically or not it happens.
2. Certainly piss can be clear - how does it miracously become coloured within 5 minutes of sex if just previously it was coloured? Do only well hydrated women gush?
3. Gushing is very different from orgasm.
I'll just refer you back to the study - ultrasound and all that...
and it's piss.
I'm interested in how you'd know what gushing feels like though. Was it like a satisfying pee? "you can't refer anyone back to a study as you haven't posted one. | |||
"you can't refer anyone back to a study as you haven't posted one." Fucks sake, really?
You copy and paste a 50 year old study and a hypothesis and think that proves the case??!
Ah well, as apparently it's more difficult to use Google than I'd assumed - here's your study:
Volume 12, Issue 3
March 2015
Pages 661–666
ORIGINAL RESEARCH—BEHAVIOR
Nature and Origin of “Squirting” in Female Sexuality
First published: 24 December 2014Full publication history
DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12799View/save citation
Introduction
During sexual stimulation, some women report the discharge of a noticeable amount of fluid from the urethra, a phenomenon also called “squirting.” To date, both the nature and the origin of squirting remain controversial. In this investigation, we not only analyzed the biochemical nature of the emitted fluid, but also explored the presence of any pelvic liquid collection that could result from sexual arousal and explain a massive fluid emission.
Methods
Seven women, without gynecologic abnormalities and who reported recurrent and massive fluid emission during sexual stimulation, underwent provoked sexual arousal. Pelvic ultrasound scans were performed after voluntary urination (US1), and during sexual stimulation just before (US2) and after (US3) squirting. Urea, creatinine, uric acid, and prostatic-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations were assessed in urinary samples before sexual stimulation (BSU) and after squirting (ASU), and squirting sample itself (S).
Results
In all participants, US1 confirmed thorough bladder emptiness. After a variable time of sexual excitation, US2 (just before squirting) showed noticeable bladder filling, and US3 (just after squirting) demonstrated that the bladder had been emptied again. Biochemical analysis of BSU, S, and ASU showed comparable urea, creatinine, and uric acid concentrations in all participants. Yet, whereas PSA was not detected in BSU in six out of seven participants, this antigen was present in S and ASU in five out of seven participants.
Conclusions
The present data based on ultrasonographic bladder monitoring and biochemical analyses indicate that squirting is essentially the involuntary emission of urine during sexual activity, although a marginal contribution of prostatic secretions to the emitted fluid often exists. Salama S, Boitrelle F, Gauquelin A, Malagrida L, Thiounn N, and Desvaux P. Nature and origin of “squirting” in female sexuality. J Sex Med 2015;12:661–666. | |||
| |||
"thankyou. yes really. i'm used to proper scientific discussion. " I doubt that, given the studies you cited | |||
"thankyou. yes really. i'm used to proper scientific discussion. I doubt that, given the studies you cited "Wimpissinger is real, but yes it is kind of funny. Also we can check out the credibility of your resource now. | |||
"thankyou. yes really. i'm used to proper scientific discussion. I doubt that, given the studies you cited " | |||
| |||
"thankyou. yes really. i'm used to proper scientific discussion. I doubt that, given the studies you cited
Wimpissinger is real, but yes it is kind of funny.
Also we can check out the credibility of your resource now. "ERM read it | |||
| |||
"Next female grool will be called piss I am just waiting for that to be said. " This is a new one on me. Grool? | |||
Mrs X | |||
| |||
"Why does the whole squirt/gush/piss debate bother people so much?! If you can squirt/gush and you and your partner enjoy it then it doesn't matter if you're emitting pee or pink champagne from your mary - just crack on regardless. If you can't/don't want to squirt/gush why worry about what the other ladies are up to, just enjoy whatever you enjoy and be thankful you don't have to wash as many towels and sheets! Personally, I love a nice squirty session and I don't really care what's coming out, it feels good and my husband LOVES a good soaking. Can't say I enjoyed being the recipient though, perhaps I'd have felt different if she'd warned me first and I'd closed my eyes!
Mrs X "Get your husband to piss on you and then you both can get soaking wet together
| |||
"thankyou. yes really. i'm used to proper scientific discussion. I doubt that, given the studies you cited
Wimpissinger is real, but yes it is kind of funny.
Also we can check out the credibility of your resource now.
ERM read it "credibility means things like who did the study, if they have any bias for doing the study to skew results and things like that. and old sources nothing wrong with them unless they've been disproved. you haven't disproved my resources at all. you've found a contradictory one, but no evidence that my information is oncorrect. i have found several studies that all backed up what i said, they all back up each other and contradict yours. making my case stronger. | |||
"Next female grool will be called piss I am just waiting for that to be said. This is a new one on me. Grool? "Grool is female ejaculation femsle cum. similar to male cum same colour. Obviously someone will say I am lying (cause people always say I lie on here) just search female grool. | |||
"Moalem S1, Reidenberg JS. Author information Abstract Women have glandular tissue below the bladder and surrounding the urethra that appears to be homologous to the male prostate. This tissue (also called "female prostate" or Skene's glands) appears to the source of a viscous, white secretion, which exits from the urethra upon sexual stimulation in some women. Analysis of this secretion (also known as "female ejaculate"), and comparison with pre-coital urine from the same women, revealed that its composition was unlike urine and often contained components also found in male seminal fluid (minus the sperm). The female ejaculate had lower levels of creatinine, but had elevated levels of prostate specific antigen, prostatic acidic phosphatase, prostate specific acid phosphatase, and glucose. The functional importance of female ejaculate has yet to be fully elucidated. It is possible that retention of a prostatic tissue homolog and its glandular secretion in women is merely a vestige of development and differentiation from an embryonic, gender-neutral body plan. We hypothesize that female ejaculation has a unique function in producing a secretion into the urethra that provides protection from urinary tract infections (UTIs). We further predict that female ejaculate contains antimicrobial compounds including elements such as zinc. We also hypothesize that retention of prostatic tissue and an ability to ejaculate its glandular secretion were maintained in women because these traits provided an evolutionary advantage. Specifically: (1) women who could ejaculate antimicrobial secretions into the urethra were less likely to suffer UTIs (particularly coitus-induced UTIs), (2) women without UTIs were more likely to be receptive to coitus at a greater frequency, (3) women engaging in frequent coitus were more likely to become pregnant, and (4) women who became pregnant often were more likely to successfully reproduce the species. OK miss Wikipedia " that's not wikipedia, you can have actual medical studies used as resources for wikipedia if you wanted to though. this is what people who don't use wikipedia don't realise. found it on NCBI, medical publishing site. good source of loads of info. | |||
"Moalem S1, Reidenberg JS. Author information Abstract Women have glandular tissue below the bladder and surrounding the urethra that appears to be homologous to the male prostate. This tissue (also called "female prostate" or Skene's glands) appears to the source of a viscous, white secretion, which exits from the urethra upon sexual stimulation in some women. Analysis of this secretion (also known as "female ejaculate"), and comparison with pre-coital urine from the same women, revealed that its composition was unlike urine and often contained components also found in male seminal fluid (minus the sperm). The female ejaculate had lower levels of creatinine, but had elevated levels of prostate specific antigen, prostatic acidic phosphatase, prostate specific acid phosphatase, and glucose. The functional importance of female ejaculate has yet to be fully elucidated. It is possible that retention of a prostatic tissue homolog and its glandular secretion in women is merely a vestige of development and differentiation from an embryonic, gender-neutral body plan. We hypothesize that female ejaculation has a unique function in producing a secretion into the urethra that provides protection from urinary tract infections (UTIs). We further predict that female ejaculate contains antimicrobial compounds including elements such as zinc. We also hypothesize that retention of prostatic tissue and an ability to ejaculate its glandular secretion were maintained in women because these traits provided an evolutionary advantage. Specifically: (1) women who could ejaculate antimicrobial secretions into the urethra were less likely to suffer UTIs (particularly coitus-induced UTIs), (2) women without UTIs were more likely to be receptive to coitus at a greater frequency, (3) women engaging in frequent coitus were more likely to become pregnant, and (4) women who became pregnant often were more likely to successfully reproduce the species. OK miss Wikipedia that's not wikipedia, you can have actual medical studies used as resources for wikipedia if you wanted to though. this is what people who don't use wikipedia don't realise. found it on NCBI, medical publishing site. good source of loads of info." Still copy and paste | |||
"Female ejaculate could possibly be the fluid urine mostly consists of, but it doesn’t make it pee. Seems these scientist’s theories are just that—theories, a long way from fact. This is by far not a conclusive study. Last year, in an episode of Sex With Sunny Megatron, the sex blogger/pleasure advocate urinated in one glass, ejaculated in another, and took both to a lab. The ejaculate was identified as nearly IDENTICAL to male seminal fluid—without the sperm, of course. Several other resources say the fluid has been analyzed previously, and it contains high levels of glucose, the enzyme prostatic acidic phosphatase, and low levels of urea and creatinine. A woman’s typical urine contains high levels of urea and creatinine, and no prostatic acidic phosphatase or glucose. The French study the website wrote about only included seven participants, so it’s not exactly a representative sample size, and even the study concludes the prostate-specific antigen was present in five out of the seven post-squirting samples while it was not present in the before-squirting sample. This still makes female ejaculation different from urine, even if their study was not in agreement with other studies on the amount and types of chemicals all present in female ejaculate. Female ejaculate could possibly be the fluid urine mostly consists of, but it doesn’t make it pee. Seems these scientist’s theories are just that—theories, a long way from fact. This is by far not a conclusive study. " That's how science works. It's all theories and evidence. In this case the most recent evidence is indeed a small study. But nonetheless, ALL participants in that study were self defined squirters/gushers, but ALL of them turned out to squirt what was mostly piss. Therefore at this point in time the evidence is that it's piss. I like the suggestion that it could be wee that's not wee That's genius | |||
"Moalem S1, Reidenberg JS. Author information Abstract Women have glandular tissue below the bladder and surrounding the urethra that appears to be homologous to the male prostate. This tissue (also called "female prostate" or Skene's glands) appears to the source of a viscous, white secretion, which exits from the urethra upon sexual stimulation in some women. Analysis of this secretion (also known as "female ejaculate"), and comparison with pre-coital urine from the same women, revealed that its composition was unlike urine and often contained components also found in male seminal fluid (minus the sperm). The female ejaculate had lower levels of creatinine, but had elevated levels of prostate specific antigen, prostatic acidic phosphatase, prostate specific acid phosphatase, and glucose. The functional importance of female ejaculate has yet to be fully elucidated. It is possible that retention of a prostatic tissue homolog and its glandular secretion in women is merely a vestige of development and differentiation from an embryonic, gender-neutral body plan. We hypothesize that female ejaculation has a unique function in producing a secretion into the urethra that provides protection from urinary tract infections (UTIs). We further predict that female ejaculate contains antimicrobial compounds including elements such as zinc. We also hypothesize that retention of prostatic tissue and an ability to ejaculate its glandular secretion were maintained in women because these traits provided an evolutionary advantage. Specifically: (1) women who could ejaculate antimicrobial secretions into the urethra were less likely to suffer UTIs (particularly coitus-induced UTIs), (2) women without UTIs were more likely to be receptive to coitus at a greater frequency, (3) women engaging in frequent coitus were more likely to become pregnant, and (4) women who became pregnant often were more likely to successfully reproduce the species. OK miss Wikipedia that's not wikipedia, you can have actual medical studies used as resources for wikipedia if you wanted to though. this is what people who don't use wikipedia don't realise. found it on NCBI, medical publishing site. good source of loads of info. Still copy and paste " so? do you think i can't understand studies just because i don't do them myself. you present the information you want people to challenge, you back it up if challenged or accept it is wrong if someone can prove otherwise. debating really is as simple as that. tbh i was kind of pushing it hoping for a proper debate on this but whatever. | |||
"Next female grool will be called piss I am just waiting for that to be said. This is a new one on me. Grool?
Grool is female ejaculation femsle cum. similar to male cum same colour.
Obviously someone will say I am lying (cause people always say I lie on here) just search female grool.
"I won't be researching female Grool, no
Female Grool
That's made my night, thanks | |||
"Female ejaculate could possibly be the fluid urine mostly consists of, but it doesn’t make it pee. Seems these scientist’s theories are just that—theories, a long way from fact. This is by far not a conclusive study. Last year, in an episode of Sex With Sunny Megatron, the sex blogger/pleasure advocate urinated in one glass, ejaculated in another, and took both to a lab. The ejaculate was identified as nearly IDENTICAL to male seminal fluid—without the sperm, of course. Several other resources say the fluid has been analyzed previously, and it contains high levels of glucose, the enzyme prostatic acidic phosphatase, and low levels of urea and creatinine. A woman’s typical urine contains high levels of urea and creatinine, and no prostatic acidic phosphatase or glucose. The French study the website wrote about only included seven participants, so it’s not exactly a representative sample size, and even the study concludes the prostate-specific antigen was present in five out of the seven post-squirting samples while it was not present in the before-squirting sample. This still makes female ejaculation different from urine, even if their study was not in agreement with other studies on the amount and types of chemicals all present in female ejaculate. Female ejaculate could possibly be the fluid urine mostly consists of, but it doesn’t make it pee. Seems these scientist’s theories are just that—theories, a long way from fact. This is by far not a conclusive study. That's how science works. It's all theories and evidence. In this case the most recent evidence is indeed a small study. But nonetheless, ALL participants in that study were self defined squirters/gushers, but ALL of them turned out to squirt what was mostly piss. Therefore at this point in time the evidence is that it's piss. I like the suggestion that it could be wee that's not wee That's genius "his is 2016, the most recent evidence. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Female ejaculate could possibly be the fluid urine mostly consists of, but it doesn’t make it pee. Seems these scientist’s theories are just that—theories, a long way from fact. This is by far not a conclusive study. Last year, in an episode of Sex With Sunny Megatron, the sex blogger/pleasure advocate urinated in one glass, ejaculated in another, and took both to a lab. The ejaculate was identified as nearly IDENTICAL to male seminal fluid—without the sperm, of course. Several other resources say the fluid has been analyzed previously, and it contains high levels of glucose, the enzyme prostatic acidic phosphatase, and low levels of urea and creatinine. A woman’s typical urine contains high levels of urea and creatinine, and no prostatic acidic phosphatase or glucose. The French study the website wrote about only included seven participants, so it’s not exactly a representative sample size, and even the study concludes the prostate-specific antigen was present in five out of the seven post-squirting samples while it was not present in the before-squirting sample. This still makes female ejaculation different from urine, even if their study was not in agreement with other studies on the amount and types of chemicals all present in female ejaculate. Female ejaculate could possibly be the fluid urine mostly consists of, but it doesn’t make it pee. Seems these scientist’s theories are just that—theories, a long way from fact. This is by far not a conclusive study. That's how science works. It's all theories and evidence. In this case the most recent evidence is indeed a small study. But nonetheless, ALL participants in that study were self defined squirters/gushers, but ALL of them turned out to squirt what was mostly piss. Therefore at this point in time the evidence is that it's piss. I like the suggestion that it could be wee that's not wee That's genius
his is 2016, the most recent evidence."
Come on.... you went on and on about needing a scientific study... then you finally got it (ignored it) but now a blogger pissing in a glass for sex with a transformer is suddenly acceptable as 'evidence'
This is too good | |||
| |||
"Moalem S1, Reidenberg JS. Author information Abstract Women have glandular tissue below the bladder and surrounding the urethra that appears to be homologous to the male prostate. This tissue (also called "female prostate" or Skene's glands) appears to the source of a viscous, white secretion, which exits from the urethra upon sexual stimulation in some women. Analysis of this secretion (also known as "female ejaculate"), and comparison with pre-coital urine from the same women, revealed that its composition was unlike urine and often contained components also found in male seminal fluid (minus the sperm). The female ejaculate had lower levels of creatinine, but had elevated levels of prostate specific antigen, prostatic acidic phosphatase, prostate specific acid phosphatase, and glucose. The functional importance of female ejaculate has yet to be fully elucidated. It is possible that retention of a prostatic tissue homolog and its glandular secretion in women is merely a vestige of development and differentiation from an embryonic, gender-neutral body plan. We hypothesize that female ejaculation has a unique function in producing a secretion into the urethra that provides protection from urinary tract infections (UTIs). We further predict that female ejaculate contains antimicrobial compounds including elements such as zinc. We also hypothesize that retention of prostatic tissue and an ability to ejaculate its glandular secretion were maintained in women because these traits provided an evolutionary advantage. Specifically: (1) women who could ejaculate antimicrobial secretions into the urethra were less likely to suffer UTIs (particularly coitus-induced UTIs), (2) women without UTIs were more likely to be receptive to coitus at a greater frequency, (3) women engaging in frequent coitus were more likely to become pregnant, and (4) women who became pregnant often were more likely to successfully reproduce the species. OK miss Wikipedia that's not wikipedia, you can have actual medical studies used as resources for wikipedia if you wanted to though. this is what people who don't use wikipedia don't realise. found it on NCBI, medical publishing site. good source of loads of info. Still copy and paste so? do you think i can't understand studies just because i don't do them myself. you present the information you want people to challenge, you back it up if challenged or accept it is wrong if someone can prove otherwise. debating really is as simple as that. tbh i was kind of pushing it hoping for a proper debate on this but whatever." Zzzzzz | |||
"What does it matter what it is and where it comes from ? As long as both parties are enjoying it! Mrs N loves the feeling of release, and she finds it incredibly pleasurable, so we don't bother to analyse it, just enjoy it !" I agree with this. It's just funny the extent people go to deny it. Embrace it, if that's what you're into | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee" | |||
| |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee" i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all." All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! | |||
"It's weird how folk insist it's piss. It's like they are trying to tell us not to do it. I enjoy and don't deny it. Just don't like the mess it makes "Not at all. Lots of people are into water sports, golden showers etc. I sometimes fuck Twirl in the arse. I don't deny that poo comes from there. | |||
"It's weird how folk insist it's piss. It's like they are trying to tell us not to do it. I enjoy and don't deny it. Just don't like the mess it makes
Not at all. Lots of people are into water sports, golden showers etc.
I sometimes fuck Twirl in the arse. I don't deny that poo comes from there."It's not poo it's piss dam it! | |||
"Why does the whole squirt/gush/piss debate bother people so much?! If you can squirt/gush and you and your partner enjoy it then it doesn't matter if you're emitting pee or pink champagne from your mary - just crack on regardless. If you can't/don't want to squirt/gush why worry about what the other ladies are up to, just enjoy whatever you enjoy and be thankful you don't have to wash as many towels and sheets! Personally, I love a nice squirty session and I don't really care what's coming out, it feels good and my husband LOVES a good soaking. Can't say I enjoyed being the recipient though, perhaps I'd have felt different if she'd warned me first and I'd closed my eyes!
Mrs X
Get your husband to piss on you and then you both can get soaking wet together
"No thanks, we're not into watersports, just me squirting and gushing .... and so the debate continues | |||
| |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! " lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all." To summarise: You quoted a HYPOTHESIS, a proposal, a 50+ year old study, and endorsed some blogger with a glass. I quoted the study you demanded. I haven't proved anything. I've just stated the fact that at this point in time the best evidence suggests it is piss. You don't like that. That's OK. It's still wee. | |||
"Why does the whole squirt/gush/piss debate bother people so much?! If you can squirt/gush and you and your partner enjoy it then it doesn't matter if you're emitting pee or pink champagne from your mary - just crack on regardless. If you can't/don't want to squirt/gush why worry about what the other ladies are up to, just enjoy whatever you enjoy and be thankful you don't have to wash as many towels and sheets! Personally, I love a nice squirty session and I don't really care what's coming out, it feels good and my husband LOVES a good soaking. Can't say I enjoyed being the recipient though, perhaps I'd have felt different if she'd warned me first and I'd closed my eyes!
Mrs X
Get your husband to piss on you and then you both can get soaking wet together
No thanks, we're not into watersports, just me squirting and gushing .... and so the debate continues "Noooooo | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit." No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence | |||
| |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence " eh? maybe read all of the topic again. you don't have to coz i don't care for your opinion on what i think my body does but just saying the proof is there. | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence eh? maybe read all of the topic again. you don't have to coz i don't care for your opinion on what i think my body does but just saying the proof is there." Didn't read your first copy and paste And copy and pasted isn't proof of what you said! It's just you copy and pasfing Really don't give a hoot about what your body is capable of | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence eh? maybe read all of the topic again. you don't have to coz i don't care for your opinion on what i think my body does but just saying the proof is there. Didn't read your first copy and paste And copy and pasted isn't proof of what you said! It's just you copy and pasfing Really don't give a hoot about what your body is capable of "i was giving you a chance to notice that "i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done." anyway i was brought up by a narcissitic sociopath and learned a long time ago how to deal with people trying to shame you, nothing you say bothers me. goodnight. | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence eh? maybe read all of the topic again. you don't have to coz i don't care for your opinion on what i think my body does but just saying the proof is there. Didn't read your first copy and paste And copy and pasted isn't proof of what you said! It's just you copy and pasfing Really don't give a hoot about what your body is capable of
i was giving you a chance to notice that i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done.
anyway i was brought up by a narcissitic sociopath and learned a long time ago how to deal with people trying to shame you, nothing you say bothers me.
goodnight."Agree that the government always have and always will lie to the people, and for real who gives a shit of its pee or not; the only ones who should care are the ones on the receiving end of the squirt!!!! | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence eh? maybe read all of the topic again. you don't have to coz i don't care for your opinion on what i think my body does but just saying the proof is there. Didn't read your first copy and paste And copy and pasted isn't proof of what you said! It's just you copy and pasfing Really don't give a hoot about what your body is capable of
i was giving you a chance to notice that i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done.
anyway i was brought up by a narcissitic sociopath and learned a long time ago how to deal with people trying to shame you, nothing you say bothers me.
goodnight."How am I shaming you? All I said your so called scientific evidence is just copy and pasted! If I was going up shame you i would have said you got dirty soles in one of your pics | |||
"I once met a woman who could do it on demand, must have happened like 6 times in the space of 2 hours I have no control over mine happening... and I have never met anyone able to get me to a point where I cant do it anymore. " Yeah I think it's like pringles, 'once you pop you just can't stop'! But seriously speaking once that initial trigger has been overcome, it becomes almost habit | |||
"I once met a woman who could do it on demand, must have happened like 6 times in the space of 2 hours I have no control over mine happening... and I have never met anyone able to get me to a point where I cant do it anymore. Yeah I think it's like pringles, 'once you pop you just can't stop'! But seriously speaking once that initial trigger has been overcome, it becomes almost habit " I agree. Recently I had a guy make me do it about 15 times in an hour. The next guy I met I couldn't bloody help it happening. It's been a while so intrigued to see what happens next time with either of them. | |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence eh? maybe read all of the topic again. you don't have to coz i don't care for your opinion on what i think my body does but just saying the proof is there. Didn't read your first copy and paste And copy and pasted isn't proof of what you said! It's just you copy and pasfing Really don't give a hoot about what your body is capable of
i was giving you a chance to notice that i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done.
anyway i was brought up by a narcissitic sociopath and learned a long time ago how to deal with people trying to shame you, nothing you say bothers me.
goodnight.
How am I shaming you?
All I said your so called scientific evidence is just copy and pasted!
If I was going up shame you i would have said you got dirty soles in one of your pics "when i went back to look for the comments you accused of me of not posting i noticed your first comment in the topic. and it wasn't just aimed at me, it was aimed at everyone who squirts. that's not dirt. i don't wear shoes hardly so the skin is different there to someone who wears them. not that having dirty feet would bother me, i like to pander to foot fetishists fantasies so have done videos of actual dirty feet also. ignorance is bliss i guess. | |||
| |||
"Throwing research about isn't debate. It stifles it. Debate involves giving an opinion and then backing it up, not copy and pasting old hypotheses. My firm opinion is that if it looks like piss, comes from where people wee wee, tastes like piss, has been shown to be piss in a recent medical study, is classified as piss by the govt. for porn...... it's most likely.... weeeeeeee i'm done. people have given their own personal accounts, i have given scientific research. you've not proved anything anyone said is wrong, just keep trotting out it's piss it's piss. and if you think you can trust a goverment that has lied already, and that is run by moralistic christians that might have an agenda for banning porn, who are slowly trying to erode it's peoples rights, then you are definitely not giving us any more evidence that it's pee at all. All you have given us is copy and paste Now bore off! lol, no i haven't. i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done. oops didn't realise who had posted that. ignore that last bit. No you haven't You just copy and pasted your so called scientific evidence eh? maybe read all of the topic again. you don't have to coz i don't care for your opinion on what i think my body does but just saying the proof is there. Didn't read your first copy and paste And copy and pasted isn't proof of what you said! It's just you copy and pasfing Really don't give a hoot about what your body is capable of
i was giving you a chance to notice that i have given my own personal experience of what i feel my body has done.
anyway i was brought up by a narcissitic sociopath and learned a long time ago how to deal with people trying to shame you, nothing you say bothers me.
goodnight.
How am I shaming you?
All I said your so called scientific evidence is just copy and pasted!
If I was going up shame you i would have said you got dirty soles in one of your pics
when i went back to look for the comments you accused of me of not posting i noticed your first comment in the topic. and it wasn't just aimed at me, it was aimed at everyone who squirts.
that's not dirt. i don't wear shoes hardly so the skin is different there to someone who wears them. not that having dirty feet would bother me, i like to pander to foot fetishists fantasies so have done videos of actual dirty feet also.
ignorance is bliss i guess."Ffs you still going on about your life story No one cares | |||
"when i went back to look for the comments you accused of me of not posting i noticed your first comment in the topic. and it wasn't just aimed at me, it was aimed at everyone who squirts. that's not dirt. i don't wear shoes hardly so the skin is different there to someone who wears them. not that having dirty feet would bother me, i like to pander to foot fetishists fantasies so have done videos of actual dirty feet also. ignorance is bliss i guess." It's not worth arguing with idiots - they drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. | |||
| |||
"when i went back to look for the comments you accused of me of not posting i noticed your first comment in the topic. and it wasn't just aimed at me, it was aimed at everyone who squirts. that's not dirt. i don't wear shoes hardly so the skin is different there to someone who wears them. not that having dirty feet would bother me, i like to pander to foot fetishists fantasies so have done videos of actual dirty feet also. ignorance is bliss i guess. It's not worth arguing with idiots - they drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. "speaking from experience? | |||
"Wee can be clear fluid and (I'm told) sweet tasting
It can, but it never comes from the vagina which is where a gush comes from.
How can you prove that? The scientists haven't managed to, so that's impressive
can't post a link but i'm getting good at finding info. this is not my own sidney university research btw.
The G-Spot and Female Ejaculation
Before Perry and Whipple, other researcher studied the urethral sponge, not for its erotic potential, but because they were interested in the gland around it, the paraurethral glands, tiny fluid-producing structures located around the female urethra. The first two were discovered by Alexander Skene in the 1880's and are called Skene’s glands. Since then, several others have been identified. The arrangement of these glands, and the fact that they produced fluid suggested the male prostate, and some anatomists began calling the urethral sponge the “female prostate.” Recent research has strengthened the case that the paraurethral glands are, in fact, the female analog of the prostate.
Perry and Whipple incorporated this into their book, saying that when a woman is highly sexually aroused, with an aroused G-spot, the paraurethral glands secrete fluid that emerges on orgasm as “female ejaculation.” (I posted a blog about female ejaculation on January 2, 2014. See the archive.)
Urination on Orgasm?
This observation seemed to explain a good deal of sexual history. Writers dating back to the first-century Roman physician, Galen, had remarked that women produce a "thin" fluid that "manifestly flows when they experience the greatest pleasure in coitus." The ancient Indian Kama Sutra and centuries-old Japanese erotic works also mention fluid issuing from women during sexual arousal.
But both Alfred Kinsey, the first modern American sex researcher who published in the 1950s, and Masters and Johnson, the researchers who invented sex therapy in the 1960s, rejected the notion of female ejaculation, saying that some women simply produced a great deal of vaginal lubrication.
However, vaginal lubrication does not squirt out during orgasm. Many women notice that they release fluid this way—and often feel embarrassed that they “urinate” during orgasm. Many women ejaculators have examined their fluid and determined by color and odor that it is not urine. The research confirms this.
Not Urine
Female ejaculatory fluid is not urine, but mainly secretions from the paraurethral glands with a little dilute urine mixed in. Some researchers say it's most similar to the prostatic fluid that accounts for most of the fluid in semen.
Normal and Safe
How many women ejaculate? Depending on the survey, somewhere between 10 and 50 percent. But the amount of fluid released varies considerably from a few drops to much more.
It is perfectly safe for women to ejaculate. You may have to change the sheets or make love on a towel, but no harm has ever been associated with female ejaculation. In fact, one study suggests that women who ejaculate may enjoy some protection from bladder infections, presumably because ejaculation helps expel bacteria from the urethra.
It's also perfectly normal not to ejaculate. Many women do not. If you don't but would like to, try extended foreplay with lots of deep G-spot massage.
Why do some women ejaculate while others do not? No one knows. But the process seems to be related to G-spot sensitivity. Women with sexually sensitive G-spots are the ones most likely to ejaculate. This makes physiological sense because the nerves that excite the clitoris also run along the sides of the vagina and cover the area around the G-spot, which includes the paraurethral glands.
brb, there's more."I agree, but I really wish to carry out my own research. Volunteers for this research will be rewarded with many orgasms, squirts, gushes and my spunk. Regular appointments will be necessary and some none squirters, gushers and pee'ers will be needed as a control sample. When can you ladies start? Apply within. | |||
| |||
"when i went back to look for the comments you accused of me of not posting i noticed your first comment in the topic. and it wasn't just aimed at me, it was aimed at everyone who squirts. that's not dirt. i don't wear shoes hardly so the skin is different there to someone who wears them. not that having dirty feet would bother me, i like to pander to foot fetishists fantasies so have done videos of actual dirty feet also. ignorance is bliss i guess. It's not worth arguing with idiots - they drag you down to their level then beat you with experience. "i didn't even bother coming back in here last night coz i wanted to have fun discussion or debate would have been ok too. there's a guy offering to test us lol. one of the swingers club should make this argument official and hold a gushers night and get some scientists in. | |||
" one of the swingers club should make this argument official and hold a gushers night and get some scientists in. "-- What a great idea.
Sounds like a lot of fun in the name of science and research.
It would be rude of me not to offer my services as a guinea pig to help out with delivery and to receive during the experiments. | |||
" one of the swingers club should make this argument official and hold a gushers night and get some scientists in.
--
What a great idea.
Sounds like a lot of fun in the name of science and research.
It would be rude of me not to offer my services as a guinea pig to help out with delivery and to receive during the experiments. "morning.
glad you volunteered, i was thinking of doing so myself. | |||
" one of the swingers club should make this argument official and hold a gushers night and get some scientists in.
--
What a great idea.
Sounds like a lot of fun in the name of science and research.
It would be rude of me not to offer my services as a guinea pig to help out with delivery and to receive during the experiments.
morning.
glad you volunteered, i was thinking of doing so myself. "-- Morning. Well that's very kind of you to also volunteer to help out in such an experiment. The things we are willing to do for science research. | |||
| |||
| |||
"As a gusher I should also volunteer. More than happy for said liquid to be test. " -- It's always nice to have more volunteers. Gives you a better control sample. So thanks for offering to help out.
Besides..
We now have backroom support offered as well from our Chartered Chemist (thanks for adding your availability to this)
| |||
| |||
| |||
"next time this stuff is in the news we should contact them to sort this out for us. they can pay for travel and equipment as well. "-- As long as it is us doing the experiments and tests.
Then that is all that matters.
IF they want to pay for venue, travel and equipment? then fine with me.
But for something so major an investigation!! I do feel I need to be hands on. | |||
"next time this stuff is in the news we should contact them to sort this out for us. they can pay for travel and equipment as well.
--
As long as it is us doing the experiments and tests.
Then that is all that matters.
IF they want to pay for venue, travel and equipment? then fine with me.
But for something so major an investigation!! I do feel I need to be hands on. "haha. yes, all in the name of science of course. | |||
| |||
"next time this stuff is in the news we should contact them to sort this out for us. they can pay for travel and equipment as well.
--
As long as it is us doing the experiments and tests.
Then that is all that matters.
IF they want to pay for venue, travel and equipment? then fine with me.
But for something so major an investigation!! I do feel I need to be hands on.
haha. yes, all in the name of science of course. "Why don't you be the scientist Your the one who is proclaiming to be an expert on the subject, when in reality you know fuck all Except copy and paste rubbish | |||
"Yey go us the little scientific team "--
I am sure many important discoveries have been found over the years with little scientific teams.
So go us indeed. | |||
