FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Think some guys think the girls on here are prostitutes
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off)" Only some guys?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) Only some guys?? " yeah, some. many are perfectly lovely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off)" And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown." Flip your post around and substitute the word princess with 'being respected' Being messaged with 'In hotel now wanna meet' does not show any respect in my eyes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown." And why shouldn't ladies on here expect to be treated as such? In case you hadn't noticed, single ladies are in the minority on here and thus the balance of power is not in your favour. If you don't like it or don't want to treat the ladies how they wish then you'd better make do with your right hand for company | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown. Flip your post around and substitute the word princess with 'being respected' Being messaged with 'In hotel now wanna meet' does not show any respect in my eyes " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"...some are, or at least escorts lol" Seems to be loads now, I could name six off the top of my head but I won't, obviously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown. Flip your post around and substitute the word princess with 'being respected' Being messaged with 'In hotel now wanna meet' does not show any respect in my eyes " Nowt surprises me on here, disrespectful yes in my opinion but, I'm thinking this actually does work sometimes. This has to be one of the most common messages received on a weekend. Him | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm glad you said some men OP " It is only some men, like I said I have met some lovely guys from here but messages like that drive me & many others mad & is what makes some women & couples do a blanket block to all guys which I think is unfair & don't want to ever be pushed to do | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown. Flip your post around and substitute the word princess with 'being respected' Being messaged with 'In hotel now wanna meet' does not show any respect in my eyes Nowt surprises me on here, disrespectful yes in my opinion but, I'm thinking this actually does work sometimes. This has to be one of the most common messages received on a weekend. Him" Well I have had 3 of those type of messages today alone, so obviously my profile has not been read and they also think I don't need any pictures of them in order to make a decision, so yes, they must think I am some kind of free prostitute who is gagging for sex 24/7 and any cock will do | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown." Absolutely nothing wrong with being a prostitute & if I was obviously id be getting paid and be more accommodating but I also I wouldn't be on here as it's not allowed But I'm not a prostitute I'm a regular woman & 4 guys from here talked themselves into my knickers within a month so I'm guessing I'm not a princess either I'm just someone who appreciates some normal chat/manners | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off)" b We are horny and in your area now?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the majority of men on here are like this. very few men are respectful. it's depressing." We're not all bad, some of us are polite | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"the majority of men on here are like this. very few men are respectful. it's depressing. We're not all bad, some of us are polite " A lot are polite in my opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown." Just because I don't want to f**k with some tubby little old man doesn't mean that I think I am a 'princess' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off)" Totally agree with you When are your legs opening is another one Seriously?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do believe that 'some' women are just as bad n do the same. Ive been told that 'some' love the idea of having a stranger turn up, fuck them silly n leave cos hubby/bf/kids are due back later. Its not my cup of tea but this is where some of the guys who has had meets like this n assume all women just want 'fuck n go'. This site does have more men but bet if u ask a guy, bet they've received a few messages from women who wants them to go over now n fuck them! They ruin it for some of the single women who would like to spend quality time with a meet. " I can safely say I have not received a "fuck me now message" from anyone. Maybe I'm too polite.....feeling all left out now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do believe that 'some' women are just as bad n do the same. Ive been told that 'some' love the idea of having a stranger turn up, fuck them silly n leave cos hubby/bf/kids are due back later. Its not my cup of tea but this is where some of the guys who has had meets like this n assume all women just want 'fuck n go'. This site does have more men but bet if u ask a guy, bet they've received a few messages from women who wants them to go over now n fuck them! They ruin it for some of the single women who would like to spend quality time with a meet. " That is why reading a profile is important rather than just think you are catalogue shopping! My profile clearly says I am not a fuck a go, so at times I feel I have the right to respond with 'Fuck Off' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown. Flip your post around and substitute the word princess with 'being respected' Being messaged with 'In hotel now wanna meet' does not show any respect in my eyes Nowt surprises me on here, disrespectful yes in my opinion but, I'm thinking this actually does work sometimes. This has to be one of the most common messages received on a weekend. Him Well I have had 3 of those type of messages today alone, so obviously my profile has not been read and they also think I don't need any pictures of them in order to make a decision, so yes, they must think I am some kind of free prostitute who is gagging for sex 24/7 and any cock will do " Couldn't have put it better | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do believe that 'some' women are just as bad n do the same. Ive been told that 'some' love the idea of having a stranger turn up, fuck them silly n leave cos hubby/bf/kids are due back later. Its not my cup of tea but this is where some of the guys who has had meets like this n assume all women just want 'fuck n go'. This site does have more men but bet if u ask a guy, bet they've received a few messages from women who wants them to go over now n fuck them! They ruin it for some of the single women who would like to spend quality time with a meet. " Yep, fancy that, people's preferences and tastes differing from others, and then some how that spoils the experience for others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they " its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. " ^^ Well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. " Sorry, but bollocks. People are free to use the site as best suits them, not how you dictate. If you don't like the messages you receive use the filters and blocks. If you don't want sexual propositions try a flower arranging forum instead. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. Sorry, but bollocks. People are free to use the site as best suits them, not how you dictate. If you don't like the messages you receive use the filters and blocks. If you don't want sexual propositions try a flower arranging forum instead." I don't think it's the sexual propositions that are the issue, it's the way in which they are delivered. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. Sorry, but bollocks. People are free to use the site as best suits them, not how you dictate. If you don't like the messages you receive use the filters and blocks. If you don't want sexual propositions try a flower arranging forum instead." Absolute shite! If that is how you treat people then crack on! As I am a single female I lay out quite clearly in my profile how I do things, if they choose to ignore them then they can fuck off as well, it seems some couples think of there meets as play toys whether they are male or female, so you obviously just think of them as add on's and your play thing, so yes go to a sex site if that is what you are looking for | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. Sorry, but bollocks. People are free to use the site as best suits them, not how you dictate. If you don't like the messages you receive use the filters and blocks. If you don't want sexual propositions try a flower arranging forum instead." i have my filters on. i do the messaging and the meeting and the playing..i dont have any complaints about my social or my sex life thanks. i manage perfectly well.. so take your own 'bollocks' and fondle them in your own hands, if you are frustrated, its really not my deal..nor any other womans on here.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do believe that 'some' women are just as bad n do the same. Ive been told that 'some' love the idea of having a stranger turn up, fuck them silly n leave cos hubby/bf/kids are due back later. Its not my cup of tea but this is where some of the guys who has had meets like this n assume all women just want 'fuck n go'. This site does have more men but bet if u ask a guy, bet they've received a few messages from women who wants them to go over now n fuck them! They ruin it for some of the single women who would like to spend quality time with a meet. That is why reading a profile is important rather than just think you are catalogue shopping! My profile clearly says I am not a fuck a go, so at times I feel I have the right to respond with 'Fuck Off' " Totally agree. Like u Im single too. I dont have a hubby or bf to go home to after a meet so in all fairness, women in a couples profile can go ahead n arrange a fuck n go scenario. Its their preference but just wish guys dont treat us single women the same. Read profile..that solves a lot of wasted time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do believe that 'some' women are just as bad n do the same. Ive been told that 'some' love the idea of having a stranger turn up, fuck them silly n leave cos hubby/bf/kids are due back later. Its not my cup of tea but this is where some of the guys who has had meets like this n assume all women just want 'fuck n go'. This site does have more men but bet if u ask a guy, bet they've received a few messages from women who wants them to go over now n fuck them! They ruin it for some of the single women who would like to spend quality time with a meet. That is why reading a profile is important rather than just think you are catalogue shopping! My profile clearly says I am not a fuck a go, so at times I feel I have the right to respond with 'Fuck Off' Totally agree. Like u Im single too. I dont have a hubby or bf to go home to after a meet so in all fairness, women in a couples profile can go ahead n arrange a fuck n go scenario. Its their preference but just wish guys dont treat us single women the same. Read profile..that solves a lot of wasted time. " And might just MIGHT stop the dis-respectfulness, yes females in couples might enjoy a fuck and go but me as others as single females do not, so please respect that is all I am asking! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. Sorry, but bollocks. People are free to use the site as best suits them, not how you dictate. If you don't like the messages you receive use the filters and blocks. If you don't want sexual propositions try a flower arranging forum instead. i have my filters on. i do the messaging and the meeting and the playing..i dont have any complaints about my social or my sex life thanks. i manage perfectly well.. so take your own 'bollocks' and fondle them in your own hands, if you are frustrated, its really not my deal..nor any other womans on here.." I personally would prefer this site to be just for swinging, and maybe have another site that is a sex site. I don't know what the original intention was, and maybe there are sites out there that are more specialised. But Fab has served us well, and enabled us to become well connected with couples and singles in the swinging community, so we would be reluctant to change now. We have our filters and the way we've worded our profile has brought messages from single guys looking for free easy sex down to a minimum. But it is a shame that there are so many guys with no interest in swinging looking for what seems to be a free prostitute. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Guys on fab dont want to pay for it, they want it for free, why pay if you can get it for free " Presumably because they are still incapable of getting it for free, or too impatient | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. Sorry, but bollocks. People are free to use the site as best suits them, not how you dictate. If you don't like the messages you receive use the filters and blocks. If you don't want sexual propositions try a flower arranging forum instead. i have my filters on. i do the messaging and the meeting and the playing..i dont have any complaints about my social or my sex life thanks. i manage perfectly well.. so take your own 'bollocks' and fondle them in your own hands, if you are frustrated, its really not my deal..nor any other womans on here.." Because everyone's just dying to know all about your sex life! No thanks. I mentioned nothing of frustration. I pointed out that we happen to use the site for NSA sex, not as the romantic dating site others expect it to be. What I see is the usual moaning women who feel entitled to dictate how men use the site complaining about some men's sense of entitlement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. Sorry, but bollocks. People are free to use the site as best suits them, not how you dictate. If you don't like the messages you receive use the filters and blocks. If you don't want sexual propositions try a flower arranging forum instead. i have my filters on. i do the messaging and the meeting and the playing..i dont have any complaints about my social or my sex life thanks. i manage perfectly well.. so take your own 'bollocks' and fondle them in your own hands, if you are frustrated, its really not my deal..nor any other womans on here.. Because everyone's just dying to know all about your sex life! No thanks. I mentioned nothing of frustration. I pointed out that we happen to use the site for NSA sex, not as the romantic dating site others expect it to be. What I see is the usual moaning women who feel entitled to dictate how men use the site complaining about some men's sense of entitlement. " use it for that..but its not that you have to change, its just your attitute.as you are entitled to use the site the way you want, others are equally entitled to do as they please and i dont dictate to men, i suggest theyd be more successful on here if they had a more considered approach to the swinging scene, ive never forced anyone to take on board my suggestions, however i can dictate who gets near me, thats my perogative and those men who treat women like a piece of meat, dont get a look in..simple..have fun babes and a lovely christmas x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I had a lovely fuck and go meet last week with a couple on here. TBH I have been one to be critical of women/couples who expect the whole "dial4blackcock" thing...but I found the meeting somewhat refreshing. They were cool and laid back and local which made things pretty easy. TBH we have to remember that this is still a swinging site...I dont really get the women who seem to think that they're gonna be running into guys looking to treat them to meals out and dates. If you want that you need to take yourself to POF. Being cheesed off at blatant disrespect is understandable but, at the same time, I think alot of people just want sex without the bullshit. Sadly, in the anglicized world especially, preceding monetary exchange seems to be the only (outside of drugs/alcohol) of eliminating much of the excess baggage that comes with heterosexual casual sex. It is not really a surprise that interactions on here can seem similar." That's great that you had an enjoyable 'fuck and go', and that has its place within the swing scene, and I'm not saying I've never done that. But a huge aspect of the swing scene incorporates a social side. Couples like ourselves, who thrive on 'fucking our friends', are likely to be a disappointment to so many of the guys who are searching for something that is relatively hard to find on a swinging site, and certainly more instantly attainable on an escort site. With regards using POF, for women like myself who want to go for a few drinks prior to sex - well that's all very well for single ladies playing as a single. But what are woman who are meeting a guy as part of a couple supposed to do? POF, or any of the dating sites, are only for singles! So we have to use a swingers site when we are looking for men to join us for an evening. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off)" Totally agree it's these kinda guys that stop me messaging the genuine ones as I become dispondant xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. " I agree it is better to swing in a couple and easier if I'm honest but when you are single finding a match you can swing with and doesn't get jealous possessive or demanding is hard. Yes talking from experience been a swinger now for nearly ten years. The nightmare for me is having to change my profile reinvent the wheel due to exes then spying on my activity thinking because I swing I'm an easy shag to hook up with x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. " Do you really think all single women are after male attention? And they seek this by being 'super freaky'? You dont think women have a sexuality and know their own needs and desires? Do women not think for themselves or is everything they do framed by and for men? I speak as a single women on this site for four years before I met my OH. I did not swing during that time to 'hook' a man, indeed I had to often restrict meets with very demanding men who wanted me on tap and to be a regular thing whereas I just wanted NSA. I still swing alone and with my partner, although less so now as other things come first. Swinging at that time, when I was single, scratched an itch and didn't interfere with the rest of my life, it kept it in a box ... I certainly dont think I am the only women who has her own mind. In my experience, though, its generally men who are more threatened by this though, at least find it difficult to understand. My OH is, I think, fairly unique in this ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. " I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awfully lot of ranty slut shaming going on here. " Also why get so upset about unsuitable messages? It takes a second to delete. So some bloke who doesn't know you thinks you might want to go to his hotel tonight, and you don't want to. Delete the message. He doesn't know you. Who cares. I'm not going to get offended by people messaging me wanting to have sex with me, while I'm here with my tits out on a site where I'm looking to meet men for sex. If they started messaging my LinkedIn profile inviting me to suck them off at the side of the A19, that would be the time to be shocked or upset. On here? Not so much. Delete delete delete. They'll either find someone else who IS into that, learn a more fruitful approach, or leave. No biggie. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"RTFP; read the f**kin' profile Some women, whether in a couple or single, will sh*g anything in trousers. Send them messages like those Others get annoyed after they receive their hundredth such message of the day when they clearly are looking for NSA sex but not in some bl**dy lorry or lay-by with Quasimodo's second cousin!" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown." Jerk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do believe that 'some' women are just as bad n do the same. Ive been told that 'some' love the idea of having a stranger turn up, fuck them silly n leave cos hubby/bf/kids are due back later. Its not my cup of tea but this is where some of the guys who has had meets like this n assume all women just want 'fuck n go'. This site does have more men but bet if u ask a guy, bet they've received a few messages from women who wants them to go over now n fuck them! They ruin it for some of the single women who would like to spend quality time with a meet. " When I met men as a single female I always wanted 'fuck and go' and it was the men I met who usually wanted more, which caused too much baggage. I think it suited both sides when it worked completely as an nsa ... now I meet men with my partner, we are both after similar as we dont need any type of relationship or friendship with anyone we meet for sex. We keep friends for the 'real world'. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off) And what is wrong with a female being a prostitute? Flip your post around and similarly far too many females on here think they are Princesses and expect to be treated as such. Guys.....feel free to fire into me for posting my thoughts. After all it's all about ingratiating yourself in the hope of wearing the crown." and how is that _iew on the situation working out for u on here .personally me (the guy) thinks that all good woman should be respected or treated like a princess as u put it until i find out through interaction if they are an asshole and if so they just get ignored and move on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I might have to disagree on that (did not read what you wrote) but on the other hand women and couple think in here is dial-a-cock. " but to be completely honast it is though i could put a status up now saying looking for cock and will have loads of msgs within a couple min.fab is most definitely a woman's world weather guys like that or not. ( mr ). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. Do you really think all single women are after male attention? And they seek this by being 'super freaky'? You dont think women have a sexuality and know their own needs and desires? Do women not think for themselves or is everything they do framed by and for men? I speak as a single women on this site for four years before I met my OH. I did not swing during that time to 'hook' a man, indeed I had to often restrict meets with very demanding men who wanted me on tap and to be a regular thing whereas I just wanted NSA. I still swing alone and with my partner, although less so now as other things come first. Swinging at that time, when I was single, scratched an itch and didn't interfere with the rest of my life, it kept it in a box ... I certainly dont think I am the only women who has her own mind. In my experience, though, its generally men who are more threatened by this though, at least find it difficult to understand. My OH is, I think, fairly unique in this ..." Difficult to understand because its an outlier. Its like trying to use gay/bisexual men as the barometer for male sex behaviour whilst forgetting to acknowledge that gay men dont make up much of the population. Men find it threatening? Of course we do, especially considering we have been heavily socialized by a society peppered with christian dogmatic influence. BUT I find it rich when women will claim they're sex lives arent that different men even though its clear to anyone with an understanding of women that they go about sex in remarkably different ways. Most women participating in casual sex are still far more selective and place greater importance of personality than men do, simply because biologically the outcomes and expectations of women from sex are vastly different. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise" If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur." Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective" so you have to be living with someone to be in a relashinship even though you spend weekends and and couple week days together .does your "boyfriend" know about what else you get up too on here. i only ask as in your ranty profile you say if you find out guys are attached you will be very indiscreet and make sure there wifes find out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selectiveso you have to be living with someone to be in a relashinship even though you spend weekends and and couple week days together .does your "boyfriend" know about what else you get up too on here. i only ask as in your ranty profile you say if you find out guys are attached you will be very indiscreet and make sure there wifes find out." If you had read my 'ranty' profile (selective profile) you will have noticed that he too has his profile here Yes, for me, to be a couple means that one lives together. Your _iew may be different and so be it I do not want to meet attached men; my choice. If any lying toad tries to get around that then, yes, I will be very indiscreet So, what was the point you were trying to make? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. " well said and so true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. Do you really think all single women are after male attention? And they seek this by being 'super freaky'? You dont think women have a sexuality and know their own needs and desires? Do women not think for themselves or is everything they do framed by and for men? I speak as a single women on this site for four years before I met my OH. I did not swing during that time to 'hook' a man, indeed I had to often restrict meets with very demanding men who wanted me on tap and to be a regular thing whereas I just wanted NSA. I still swing alone and with my partner, although less so now as other things come first. Swinging at that time, when I was single, scratched an itch and didn't interfere with the rest of my life, it kept it in a box ... I certainly dont think I am the only women who has her own mind. In my experience, though, its generally men who are more threatened by this though, at least find it difficult to understand. My OH is, I think, fairly unique in this ... Difficult to understand because its an outlier. Its like trying to use gay/bisexual men as the barometer for male sex behaviour whilst forgetting to acknowledge that gay men dont make up much of the population. Men find it threatening? Of course we do, especially considering we have been heavily socialized by a society peppered with christian dogmatic influence. BUT I find it rich when women will claim they're sex lives arent that different men even though its clear to anyone with an understanding of women that they go about sex in remarkably different ways. Most women participating in casual sex are still far more selective and place greater importance of personality than men do, simply because biologically the outcomes and expectations of women from sex are vastly different. " I think bi men make up a lot more of the male population than anyone lets on and I also think these boundaries are fluid. I don't think everyone's experience of Christian culture is the same either, to be honest. I am always up for a quick and easy tuck, but luckily I have my partner for that .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selectiveso you have to be living with someone to be in a relashinship even though you spend weekends and and couple week days together .does your "boyfriend" know about what else you get up too on here. i only ask as in your ranty profile you say if you find out guys are attached you will be very indiscreet and make sure there wifes find out. If you had read my 'ranty' profile (selective profile) you will have noticed that he too has his profile here Yes, for me, to be a couple means that one lives together. Your _iew may be different and so be it I do not want to meet attached men; my choice. If any lying toad tries to get around that then, yes, I will be very indiscreet So, what was the point you were trying to make?" that is good if you to edit him in there eh .your kind of contradicting yourself as it olso says you have a boyfriend who is more than a fb or fwb.to be honast i dont really care its just the whole being indiscreet and tracking down wifes thing in your profile i found a bit weird and annoying so yea peace out and have fun . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. well said and so true " I can't speak for any other women on here but I'm not here to win anyone's affections. I'm here for sexual gratification, with men who turn me on. I use my brain, instincts and conversation to decide who to meet. My sex life is very rewarding. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. well said and so true I can't speak for any other women on here but I'm not here to win anyone's affections. I'm here for sexual gratification, with men who turn me on. I use my brain, instincts and conversation to decide who to meet. My sex life is very rewarding. " I am intrigued by the idea that at least one mannered thinks women's sex lives and behaviour revolve around trying to get a man, so I have started another thread to see what women say about it ... including the bi ones oerhaps | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. well said and so true I can't speak for any other women on here but I'm not here to win anyone's affections. I'm here for sexual gratification, with men who turn me on. I use my brain, instincts and conversation to decide who to meet. My sex life is very rewarding. I am intrigued by the idea that at least one mannered thinks women's sex lives and behaviour revolve around trying to get a man, so I have started another thread to see what women say about it ... including the bi ones oerhaps" I'll have a look. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selectiveso you have to be living with someone to be in a relashinship even though you spend weekends and and couple week days together .does your "boyfriend" know about what else you get up too on here. i only ask as in your ranty profile you say if you find out guys are attached you will be very indiscreet and make sure there wifes find out. If you had read my 'ranty' profile (selective profile) you will have noticed that he too has his profile here Yes, for me, to be a couple means that one lives together. Your _iew may be different and so be it I do not want to meet attached men; my choice. If any lying toad tries to get around that then, yes, I will be very indiscreet So, what was the point you were trying to make?that is good if you to edit him in there eh .your kind of contradicting yourself as it olso says you have a boyfriend who is more than a fb or fwb.to be honast i dont really care its just the whole being indiscreet and tracking down wifes thing in your profile i found a bit weird and annoying so yea peace out and have fun ." You have me confused now Yes, I have a boyfriend; yes, he has his profile here; yes, I mention him on my profile; yes, I have photographs of the both of us together on my profile and he, on his profile; yes, I don't like liars and will expose them; yes, I will choose who I want to meet and I don't want to meet attached men Once again, what was the point you were trying to make? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selectiveso you have to be living with someone to be in a relashinship even though you spend weekends and and couple week days together .does your "boyfriend" know about what else you get up too on here. i only ask as in your ranty profile you say if you find out guys are attached you will be very indiscreet and make sure there wifes find out. If you had read my 'ranty' profile (selective profile) you will have noticed that he too has his profile here Yes, for me, to be a couple means that one lives together. Your _iew may be different and so be it I do not want to meet attached men; my choice. If any lying toad tries to get around that then, yes, I will be very indiscreet So, what was the point you were trying to make?that is good if you to edit him in there eh .your kind of contradicting yourself as it olso says you have a boyfriend who is more than a fb or fwb.to be honast i dont really care its just the whole being indiscreet and tracking down wifes thing in your profile i found a bit weird and annoying so yea peace out and have fun . You have me confused now Yes, I have a boyfriend; yes, he has his profile here; yes, I mention him on my profile; yes, I have photographs of the both of us together on my profile and he, on his profile; yes, I don't like liars and will expose them; yes, I will choose who I want to meet and I don't want to meet attached men Once again, what was the point you were trying to make?" Well the point is, there is no point | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selectiveso you have to be living with someone to be in a relashinship even though you spend weekends and and couple week days together .does your "boyfriend" know about what else you get up too on here. i only ask as in your ranty profile you say if you find out guys are attached you will be very indiscreet and make sure there wifes find out. If you had read my 'ranty' profile (selective profile) you will have noticed that he too has his profile here Yes, for me, to be a couple means that one lives together. Your _iew may be different and so be it I do not want to meet attached men; my choice. If any lying toad tries to get around that then, yes, I will be very indiscreet So, what was the point you were trying to make?that is good if you to edit him in there eh .your kind of contradicting yourself as it olso says you have a boyfriend who is more than a fb or fwb.to be honast i dont really care its just the whole being indiscreet and tracking down wifes thing in your profile i found a bit weird and annoying so yea peace out and have fun . You have me confused now Yes, I have a boyfriend; yes, he has his profile here; yes, I mention him on my profile; yes, I have photographs of the both of us together on my profile and he, on his profile; yes, I don't like liars and will expose them; yes, I will choose who I want to meet and I don't want to meet attached men Once again, what was the point you were trying to make? Well the point is, there is no point " That was slowly dawning on stupid ole me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective" Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selectiveso you have to be living with someone to be in a relashinship even though you spend weekends and and couple week days together .does your "boyfriend" know about what else you get up too on here. i only ask as in your ranty profile you say if you find out guys are attached you will be very indiscreet and make sure there wifes find out." Thank you. It blows my mind how many people here are caught up in their own dishonesty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread " You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending?" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Both my OH and myself have single profiles because we meet as singles. We also have a couple profile because we meet as a couple. I am not single, I am in a relationship and we live together. Even when we weren't living together, however, I still saw myself as in a relationship, so not single. Different from a single profile, though, as all that says is Yu meet alone, without your partner | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Both my OH and myself have single profiles because we meet as singles. We also have a couple profile because we meet as a couple. I am not single, I am in a relationship and we live together. Even when we weren't living together, however, I still saw myself as in a relationship, so not single. Different from a single profile, though, as all that says is Yu meet alone, without your partner" Thank you We have a relationship where, just as yourselves, we mutally agree to each other's freedom to meet people for fun. You have met him onece or twice socially when we visited the same swingers club as yourselves. Did it strike you that he was blisfully unaware that I might have sex with a relative stranger there? We don't live together as for me, I would need to know someone for a long time before I would make such major changes to my life; for me (and this is just my feeling) a year is not enough time Lord knows how I became a "cheater" because of this Anyway, back to the topic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We've had a few last minute fuck & go meets. It's the only thing we use Fab for really. We've had a couple with Twirl tied to the bed, bloke came, fucked and left. So I guess we treat some blokes like whores " Love that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"& that our legs should be wide open & waiting for them 24/7 & before all the guys get on the defensive, I do do meets & although I have only been on the site a short time I have met guys from this site who have all been lovely & respectful it's those who are just cocky & rude in their initial messages that get my back up & get blocked, so I am not taring you all with the same brush I'm just shocked at the amount of messages I get literally just saying 'I'm horny & in your area now' Do they honestly think that'll make me drop to my knees Or if arranging a meet I say I'm free on tonight, they reply 'what not right now?' I apologise that I have a life & commitments & cant drop my knickers as soon as your message drops into my inbox Anyway apologies that's my little rant over I feel better now haha (I'm sure none of the guys from the forum send messages like those above but just incase you do, maybe change your approach as I'm guessing I'm not alone in finding those kind of messages a turn off)" thanks for the heads up... I will change my ways | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive men for thinking that women who have profiles on a sex site are looking for sex! 'kin hell! " Apparently they are all looking for relationships ... personally I had given up thinking any man could give me the type of sex I needed ... until Mr came alone ... so we got the best tofu both worlds | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive men for thinking that women who have profiles on a sex site are looking for sex! 'kin hell! Apparently they are all looking for relationships ... personally I had given up thinking any man could give me the type of sex I needed ... until Mr came alone ... so we got the best tofu both worlds" At least the tofu you got wasn't shit! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive men for thinking that women who have profiles on a sex site are looking for sex! 'kin hell! Apparently they are all looking for relationships ... personally I had given up thinking any man could give me the type of sex I needed ... until Mr came alone ... so we got the best tofu both worlds At least the tofu you got wasn't shit! " Actually I have converted him to tofu too .... how weird is that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive men for thinking that women who have profiles on a sex site are looking for sex! 'kin hell! Apparently they are all looking for relationships ... personally I had given up thinking any man could give me the type of sex I needed ... until Mr came alone ... so we got the best tofu both worlds At least the tofu you got wasn't shit! Actually I have converted him to tofu too .... how weird is that" You monster! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive men for thinking that women who have profiles on a sex site are looking for sex! 'kin hell! Apparently they are all looking for relationships ... personally I had given up thinking any man could give me the type of sex I needed ... until Mr came alone ... so we got the best tofu both worlds At least the tofu you got wasn't shit! Actually I have converted him to tofu too .... how weird is that You monster! " He even orders it when he is out with friends now .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive men for thinking that women who have profiles on a sex site are looking for sex! 'kin hell! Apparently they are all looking for relationships ... personally I had given up thinking any man could give me the type of sex I needed ... until Mr came alone ... so we got the best tofu both worlds At least the tofu you got wasn't shit! Actually I have converted him to tofu too .... how weird is that You monster! He even orders it when he is out with friends now .... " What kind of sorcery is this?! Tofu is a delicacy of lucifer himself! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awfully lot of ranty slut shaming going on here. " Certainly strikes me that way. Totally agree that 'swinging' implies that there is a social component as well as a purely sexual one. Indeed, one of the best pieces of advice I was given prior to my first visit to a swingers club was; 'don't go if your only intention is to get laid.' However, I do take issue with a number of the ideas being expressed on this thread: 1. That those primarily seeking casual sexual encounters/hook-ups are not 'real' swingers, are seeking 'free' escorts and/or prostitutes, and are not engaging in a 'legitimate' form of swinging. 2. That people who are 'forward' about their kinks are simply doing it because they think it will make it easier to get meets, rather than in order to explore a particular facet of their sexuality. 3. That prostitutes and escorts should be regarded as 'cannon fodder' who can be thrown between 'real swingers' and 'sex-obsessed men' as some kind of 'human shield.' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. " Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up " I am part of a couple on fab. I also have a single profile on fab, as does my partner (who I live with, and have done for two years). A single profile on fab means you meet as a single, it doesn't mean you are single ... that has always been my understanding, anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up " No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up " So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A single profile on fab means you meet as a single, it doesn't mean you are single ... that has always been my understanding, anyway " That's always been my understanding too. My girlfriend and I are in a committed open relationship, but we both have 'singles' profiles. People ask me all the time why don't have a couples profile...I don't know...maybe it's because we're separated by 310 miles of land and sea... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single" And: "I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. " LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee " So what about the 'single' males who are married but meeting alone? What should they say they are? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice." People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee So what about the 'single' males who are married but meeting alone? What should they say they are? " Cheaters?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. " the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee So what about the 'single' males who are married but meeting alone? What should they say they are? Cheaters?? " I think you are missing the point. There isn't a category for cheaters ... they can be a couple or single, but as they aren't meeting with their partner, when they turn up, they are a single male, although their relationship status may not be single ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. " I don't see Josie' relationship status as questionable. She has a boyfriend. Its normal. She chooses to say she is single, that's fine too. When we first met, we had more convincing to the people we might be meeting on fans that our relationship was a real one (and clubs who were saying I was his ticket) than to our families and friends. That was weird. In the real world, everyone could see we had a real relationship. As I said, people say they are single on fab because they meet alone ... it means when they meet, you expect one person to turn up, not a couple. Fans admin changes single women accounts to couple accounts if the woman meets with her partner, not because she has a partner but because she meets as a couple. The single/couple thing on fab is not about if you are in a relationship, it is about how many people will turn up to the meet. It really isn't rocket science. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awfully lot of ranty slut shaming going on here. Certainly strikes me that way. Totally agree that 'swinging' implies that there is a social component as well as a purely sexual one. Indeed, one of the best pieces of advice I was given prior to my first visit to a swingers club was; 'don't go if your only intention is to get laid.' However, I do take issue with a number of the ideas being expressed on this thread: 1. That those primarily seeking casual sexual encounters/hook-ups are not 'real' swingers, are seeking 'free' escorts and/or prostitutes, and are not engaging in a 'legitimate' form of swinging. 2. That people who are 'forward' about their kinks are simply doing it because they think it will make it easier to get meets, rather than in order to explore a particular facet of their sexuality. 3. That prostitutes and escorts should be regarded as 'cannon fodder' who can be thrown between 'real swingers' and 'sex-obsessed men' as some kind of 'human shield.'" I don't want to engage in the "legitimate" form of swinging. From what I have read and seen on here and my own attitudes towards socialising, I can state that it isn't for me. If I went to a swinger party I would be expected to make friends. I don't want to make friends on here. I have sexual partners who I don't consider friends. I'm here for the sex primarily, but that isn't fuck anyone who asks or hook up sex. I use the site how it suits me best, as a single woman. It's allowed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing." One reason and one reason alone. The more likely it is you're bullshitting about your relationship status, the more likely you are to flake. We all know that couples are, by far and away, the most consistent when it comes to meets. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing. One reason and one reason alone. The more likely it is you're bullshitting about your relationship status, the more likely you are to flake. We all know that couples are, by far and away, the most consistent when it comes to meets. " Not all of us want to meet couples though, nor do we want to pander to them .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing. One reason and one reason alone. The more likely it is you're bullshitting about your relationship status, the more likely you are to flake. We all know that couples are, by far and away, the most consistent when it comes to meets. Not all of us want to meet couples though, nor do we want to pander to them .... " Whether you want to meet couples isnt really the point. Its about who is more likely to simply show up and who isnt. Ask any guy and he will tell you single women tend to disappear alot...even the ones who dont will often actually have a partner involved. Its actually the same for single guys too. I have heard plenty of stories about guys only really being around here for the fantasy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing. One reason and one reason alone. The more likely it is you're bullshitting about your relationship status, the more likely you are to flake. We all know that couples are, by far and away, the most consistent when it comes to meets. Not all of us want to meet couples though, nor do we want to pander to them .... Whether you want to meet couples isnt really the point. Its about who is more likely to simply show up and who isnt. Ask any guy and he will tell you single women tend to disappear alot...even the ones who dont will often actually have a partner involved. Its actually the same for single guys too. I have heard plenty of stories about guys only really being around here for the fantasy. " But again, saying you meet as a single, ie alone, isn't bullshitting about your relationship status. It has nothing to do with your relationship status, its a statement of how you meet .... we each have single profiles for single meets. We don't bull shit about our relationship as its solid, but we do also meet alone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing. One reason and one reason alone. The more likely it is you're bullshitting about your relationship status, the more likely you are to flake. We all know that couples are, by far and away, the most consistent when it comes to meets. " i don't think i need to worry about that. enough people know me around here,and on the scene, to know what i'm like... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing. One reason and one reason alone. The more likely it is you're bullshitting about your relationship status, the more likely you are to flake. We all know that couples are, by far and away, the most consistent when it comes to meets. Not all of us want to meet couples though, nor do we want to pander to them .... Whether you want to meet couples isnt really the point. Its about who is more likely to simply show up and who isnt. Ask any guy and he will tell you single women tend to disappear alot...even the ones who dont will often actually have a partner involved. Its actually the same for single guys too. I have heard plenty of stories about guys only really being around here for the fantasy. But again, saying you meet as a single, ie alone, isn't bullshitting about your relationship status. It has nothing to do with your relationship status, its a statement of how you meet .... we each have single profiles for single meets. We don't bull shit about our relationship as its solid, but we do also meet alone." Ask around You may find your consistency is not shared. We cant really pretend as if flaking has not become a big pet peeve on this site. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending?" The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. People can be on here as whatever they like. I just dont get the people complaining about attached people or claiming "NO MARRIED MEN" when its rather apparent that they're of questionable relationship status themselves. Pots and kettles and all that. I am sure there are plenty of profiles here with single men and women who are both on the site as single people...but then I guess they're not really single. BUT one does beg the question...why even present yourself as single?? I have always been curious about it. As said, after you navigate sites like these you start to notice cliches. Just like plenty of women tell me that any guy who claims he "cant post pictures because he works a sensitive job" often turns out to be someone simply looking for extramarital sex...I often find there are plenty of women doing the same thing, hence the term "fab single". I'm not really one to judge, but the sanctimoniousness is amusing. the only thing you have done on this thread is judge..imo..why does it bother you so much? i find that amusing. One reason and one reason alone. The more likely it is you're bullshitting about your relationship status, the more likely you are to flake. We all know that couples are, by far and away, the most consistent when it comes to meets. Not all of us want to meet couples though, nor do we want to pander to them .... Whether you want to meet couples isnt really the point. Its about who is more likely to simply show up and who isnt. Ask any guy and he will tell you single women tend to disappear alot...even the ones who dont will often actually have a partner involved. Its actually the same for single guys too. I have heard plenty of stories about guys only really being around here for the fantasy. But again, saying you meet as a single, ie alone, isn't bullshitting about your relationship status. It has nothing to do with your relationship status, its a statement of how you meet .... we each have single profiles for single meets. We don't bull shit about our relationship as its solid, but we do also meet alone. Ask around You may find your consistency is not shared. We cant really pretend as if flaking has not become a big pet peeve on this site. " Don't need to ask around as I have been on the scene seven years and my partner over twenty. Lots of married couples have single profiles | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People ask for sex on a sex site. How very dare they its a swinger site..if you want instashag go to to a sex club. swingers clubs are different..as advertised this is a swingers site..the difference between should be obvious, although some guys/ couples don't like it...you are not entitled, to anything on here.. an attitude that suggests that people think this is a sex site, including 'fancy a fuck now', messages is the biggest drawback on this site. if there are escorts on here, i wish all the entitled ones would look for them, maybe then i wouldn't have to have my filters up all the time. if by 'princess' you mean i assert my choice to meet with whom i want...i suggest you change that to 'queen'. i am in charge of my body and what i do with it on here, and whom i do it with..funny that, but so 21st century.. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. " I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me" If you do expose a cheater, you need to ask yourself why? I think that is a valid question. You may be unearthing more in a relationship and doing it more damage. Whatever experience you have with a married or attached man wont be anything on a par than that he has with his partner, so why delve into that? I am not sure that someone who exposes things is doing anyone any favours. I say that as someone who was cheated on by my son's father and we were married. Our relationship was much more complex than any silly fling and I would not have welcomed any woman coming to tell me about her dalliance with my partner. She would have got a swift slap in the face and be sent on her way. Personally I dont think nsa sex will break a strong relationship .... but I may be controversial here. I don't cheat and haven't, though, but that is my moral code. I don't assume I can jump onto the lives of others to that degree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee " That I have a boyfriend who is fully aware that I am meeting single men and single women from a swingers site and that he is not involved when I meet with them. That I make it perfectly clear on my profile that I am in a relationship but meet by myself and don't hide anything from my boyfriend Once again, what is it that you do not comprehend about the above? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me If you do expose a cheater, you need to ask yourself why? I think that is a valid question. You may be unearthing more in a relationship and doing it more damage. Whatever experience you have with a married or attached man wont be anything on a par than that he has with his partner, so why delve into that? I am not sure that someone who exposes things is doing anyone any favours. I say that as someone who was cheated on by my son's father and we were married. Our relationship was much more complex than any silly fling and I would not have welcomed any woman coming to tell me about her dalliance with my partner. She would have got a swift slap in the face and be sent on her way. Personally I dont think nsa sex will break a strong relationship .... but I may be controversial here. I don't cheat and haven't, though, but that is my moral code. I don't assume I can jump onto the lives of others to that degree " But P, I don't make it my mission to expose cheaters They are welcome to do as they wish as long as they don't involve me in their cheating. I do not wish to meet them and I make that very clear from the onset Why they do what they do is none of my business. It only becomes my business if I get involved because they try to deceive me too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me If you do expose a cheater, you need to ask yourself why? I think that is a valid question. You may be unearthing more in a relationship and doing it more damage. Whatever experience you have with a married or attached man wont be anything on a par than that he has with his partner, so why delve into that? I am not sure that someone who exposes things is doing anyone any favours. I say that as someone who was cheated on by my son's father and we were married. Our relationship was much more complex than any silly fling and I would not have welcomed any woman coming to tell me about her dalliance with my partner. She would have got a swift slap in the face and be sent on her way. Personally I dont think nsa sex will break a strong relationship .... but I may be controversial here. I don't cheat and haven't, though, but that is my moral code. I don't assume I can jump onto the lives of others to that degree But P, I don't make it my mission to expose cheaters They are welcome to do as they wish as long as they don't involve me in their cheating. I do not wish to meet them and I make that very clear from the onset Why they do what they do is none of my business. It only becomes my business if I get involved because they try to deceive me too" I am goad we can disagree civilly. I just think its not really a good thing to go and create drama in someone else's relationship. Sex isn't everything in a relationship after all ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me If you do expose a cheater, you need to ask yourself why? I think that is a valid question. You may be unearthing more in a relationship and doing it more damage. Whatever experience you have with a married or attached man wont be anything on a par than that he has with his partner, so why delve into that? I am not sure that someone who exposes things is doing anyone any favours. I say that as someone who was cheated on by my son's father and we were married. Our relationship was much more complex than any silly fling and I would not have welcomed any woman coming to tell me about her dalliance with my partner. She would have got a swift slap in the face and be sent on her way. Personally I dont think nsa sex will break a strong relationship .... but I may be controversial here. I don't cheat and haven't, though, but that is my moral code. I don't assume I can jump onto the lives of others to that degree But P, I don't make it my mission to expose cheaters They are welcome to do as they wish as long as they don't involve me in their cheating. I do not wish to meet them and I make that very clear from the onset Why they do what they do is none of my business. It only becomes my business if I get involved because they try to deceive me too I am goad we can disagree civilly. I just think its not really a good thing to go and create drama in someone else's relationship. Sex isn't everything in a relationship after all ..." We have disagreed civilly on many other points before Like I said, who is cheating on who and why is none of my business until they involve me when I have specifically stated that I do not wish to be involved with married or attached men. Only, if they do, then does it become my business and I have warned any such cheater of the consequences of involving me in their cheating | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me" You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. " I remember a thread a while back where a woman had arranged to meet the wife in a coffee shop. Why though? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I remember a thread a while back where a woman had arranged to meet the wife in a coffee shop. Why though?" Exactly so think some people seriously need to consider the consequences of their actions. It's very well taking this stance but you don't know how the other person will take it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. " I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further " I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely?" P, I have actually been in situations exactly like that, twice He was lying to me and cheating on her. She found out and got in touch with me. The idiot had all my text messages on his phone. Thankfully, she accepted that the liar had, in effect, cheated on both of us The second one was waiting for me, pacing my driveway, as I returned home from work I do not wish to get involved with any such men ever again, hence my very clear warning on my profile | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely? P, I have actually been in situations exactly like that, twice He was lying to me and cheating on her. She found out and got in touch with me. The idiot had all my text messages on his phone. Thankfully, she accepted that the liar had, in effect, cheated on both of us The second one was waiting for me, pacing my driveway, as I returned home from work I do not wish to get involved with any such men ever again, hence my very clear warning on my profile" But if you found out someone you had met was cheating, or had been, would you seek out their OH? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely? P, I have actually been in situations exactly like that, twice He was lying to me and cheating on her. She found out and got in touch with me. The idiot had all my text messages on his phone. Thankfully, she accepted that the liar had, in effect, cheated on both of us The second one was waiting for me, pacing my driveway, as I returned home from work I do not wish to get involved with any such men ever again, hence my very clear warning on my profile But if you found out someone you had met was cheating, or had been, would you seek out their OH?" I wouldn't hunt her down, if that is what you are asking But if her contact details came to me easily, I will inform her that I had been lied to and that I have no further involvement with him now that his cheating on her has become known to me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely? P, I have actually been in situations exactly like that, twice He was lying to me and cheating on her. She found out and got in touch with me. The idiot had all my text messages on his phone. Thankfully, she accepted that the liar had, in effect, cheated on both of us The second one was waiting for me, pacing my driveway, as I returned home from work I do not wish to get involved with any such men ever again, hence my very clear warning on my profile But if you found out someone you had met was cheating, or had been, would you seek out their OH? I wouldn't hunt her down, if that is what you are asking But if her contact details came to me easily, I will inform her that I had been lied to and that I have no further involvement with him now that his cheating on her has become known to me" In the days when I believed in monogamy, I don't think I could have handled it if someone came and told me that my partner had cheated on me, even if they hadn't best interests at heart. I think I would have rather they left me in blissful ignorance. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely? P, I have actually been in situations exactly like that, twice He was lying to me and cheating on her. She found out and got in touch with me. The idiot had all my text messages on his phone. Thankfully, she accepted that the liar had, in effect, cheated on both of us The second one was waiting for me, pacing my driveway, as I returned home from work I do not wish to get involved with any such men ever again, hence my very clear warning on my profile But if you found out someone you had met was cheating, or had been, would you seek out their OH? I wouldn't hunt her down, if that is what you are asking But if her contact details came to me easily, I will inform her that I had been lied to and that I have no further involvement with him now that his cheating on her has become known to me In the days when I believed in monogamy, I don't think I could have handled it if someone came and told me that my partner had cheated on me, even if they hadn't best interests at heart. I think I would have rather they left me in blissful ignorance. Mrs" It is not so much for her or him. It is so that she doesn't come hunting me down, just as the last two did | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice." That summoned it up nicely Well done girl | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely? P, I have actually been in situations exactly like that, twice He was lying to me and cheating on her. She found out and got in touch with me. The idiot had all my text messages on his phone. Thankfully, she accepted that the liar had, in effect, cheated on both of us The second one was waiting for me, pacing my driveway, as I returned home from work I do not wish to get involved with any such men ever again, hence my very clear warning on my profile But if you found out someone you had met was cheating, or had been, would you seek out their OH? I wouldn't hunt her down, if that is what you are asking But if her contact details came to me easily, I will inform her that I had been lied to and that I have no further involvement with him now that his cheating on her has become known to me In the days when I believed in monogamy, I don't think I could have handled it if someone came and told me that my partner had cheated on me, even if they hadn't best interests at heart. I think I would have rather they left me in blissful ignorance. Mrs It is not so much for her or him. It is so that she doesn't come hunting me down, just as the last two did" Yes but you are saying you would have destroyed her 'happiness' to make sure you are safe? I feel the same way, I wouldn't want to know as some sexual dalliance on the side doesn't mean Diddly squat in terms if our relationship and far be it from the woman of the moment to make a decision that wouldn't be significant to her but might be for me. I don't think anyone should go meddling in another couple's relationship on that level. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. That summoned it up nicely Well done girl " Yes, but he is still not responding. I thought it was logical ... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. That summoned it up nicely Well done girl Yes, but he is still not responding. I thought it was logical ..." And logical indeed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Being single on fab is different from in the real world. Yeeeeah...just like the cheating husbands who are single on fab but married in the real world Right, so just like there is "fab straight" there is also "fab single". LOL you cant make this nonsense up So, let me get this right, you are advocating that married men who are swinging alone should be registering themselves as a couple on fab, even though they are meeting alone? Are you sure that is how it should be done? They have to categorise themselves as 'single' men because when you meet them you are meeting a single man as in the number of men you are meeting, not that he is single as a status .... see what happens if a married man meeting alone puts himself down as a couple. The category of single or couple is a statement about who you are going to meet .... hence, I am posting from a single profile because it's the one I meet alone from. Contrary to popular opinion, some women actually can meet without their partner, through choice. That summoned it up nicely Well done girl " Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also, by some distance, I think single females are BY FAR the worst users of Fab in general and part of the reason why I think a lot of single women simply are not cut out for swinging. Way too many seem to want to turn Fab into a dating site and the few I met who did have some inclination toward meeting were easily the worst offenders of the UNLOS crime. Call me sexist, I dont care. But I think swinging is really for couples. Most of us single guys tend to be looking for an easy shag and the single women tend to think they can somehow win male affection through being as "kinky" as possible. I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. But I am not looking for complete a**h*les either. They can go f**k themselves and usually, with their attitudes, that is all they end up doing here There are too many decrepit men who think they are going to get an instant shag from any woman here. They can't get a woman in the big-wide world and guess what; they can't get one here either; now, that is a surprise If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? Also, FYI, ask the many men who have experience losing their female partners to other men whose casual sex turned into real bonafide affairs. That happens alot and there are plenty of men who can attest to it. I have no idea why so many on here want to pass off this idea that they're just as casual about sex as men are but then will start asking for men to be "respectful" and patient and "willing to meet for socials/dates". Thats fundamentally different to how men treat casual sex, as we are far less picky about both looks, behavior and circumstance through which an experience can occur. Since we don't live together and meet once or twice a week and spend weekends together, yes, I am still single I don't want sex with men who I find unattractive. If all I want is a quick orgasm then I have a selection of vibrators to choose from Not all men are the same; some will sh*g anything that moves, others are more selective Does he say the same thing? Its pretty well known that "cheater" are not looked highly upon so its already a little odd when you claim you have a boyfriend and that you're single in the same thread You guys need to start reading before hitting the reply button We have only known each other a year; we do not live together; we are not married, so yes, I am single He knows I am meeting others; I know thathe is meeting others He has his own profile here; I mention him on my profile when meeting couples and he mentions me on his profile when meeting couples. We have photographs of both together on each others profiles We have much more to our relationship than FabS. We have met each other's famalies/parents, etc I do not want to meet attached men as I do not want to meet short men as I do not want to meet fat men. If anyone lies to me to meet me then I will expose them Which part are you having difficulty comprehending? The part that shocks me that you think you have the right to expose men that cheat think you seriously need to think about that and whether you could cope with the consequences of your actions as you're the one that could in fact come out worse in this situation should you expose them. As I guess things could turn violent for a start. No one has the insight into other people's relationships to be able to have the moral high ground and judge them. I don't want to meet with married or attached men. This is my choice and I WILL excercise my choice. If some lies to me to meet me then I WILL expose that person The fact that I am in a relationship does not mean that I cannot now make these choices. My boyfriend is fully aware that I meet single men and women on my own. I do not need to hide anything from my boyfriend nor him from me And those who actually bother to read my profile will notice that I am attached and meet with couples only with my boyfriend. They too can make the choice not to meet with me knowing that I am attached; that is their choice; it does not bother me in the least So, where am I cheating? You now seem to have changed your tune to frightening me into thinking that I will be assaulted if I were to expose a cheater who lies to meet with me You need to re read what I have written I'm advising that you should think very carefully about doing that I've seen the outcome of someone doing exactly what you've said you will do and it wasn't pretty. Still if you think you know that no harm will happen to you then good luck to you as I really think you will need it as someone else said a lot of people don't take too kindly to some stranger telling them things like that. Ask yourself is it worth stirring up trouble what would be the outcome do you want to put yourself in danger/serious harm? You only need to google stuff like this to see what has happened to other people when they've felt the need to expose a 'cheater' and they've ended up being the loser. I will only expose him if he does me harm by involving me in his cheating. Cheaters who do not involve me are none of my concern, whatsoever I have more to fear from the stalkers here than a cheater. The first category is unstable; the second category are just deceitful And I do have someone who will protect me if this macho-man cheater tries to harm me further I am thinking it's his OH that will be more of a threat, surely? P, I have actually been in situations exactly like that, twice He was lying to me and cheating on her. She found out and got in touch with me. The idiot had all my text messages on his phone. Thankfully, she accepted that the liar had, in effect, cheated on both of us The second one was waiting for me, pacing my driveway, as I returned home from work I do not wish to get involved with any such men ever again, hence my very clear warning on my profile But if you found out someone you had met was cheating, or had been, would you seek out their OH? I wouldn't hunt her down, if that is what you are asking But if her contact details came to me easily, I will inform her that I had been lied to and that I have no further involvement with him now that his cheating on her has become known to me In the days when I believed in monogamy, I don't think I could have handled it if someone came and told me that my partner had cheated on me, even if they hadn't best interests at heart. I think I would have rather they left me in blissful ignorance. Mrs It is not so much for her or him. It is so that she doesn't come hunting me down, just as the last two did Yes but you are saying you would have destroyed her 'happiness' to make sure you are safe? I feel the same way, I wouldn't want to know as some sexual dalliance on the side doesn't mean Diddly squat in terms if our relationship and far be it from the woman of the moment to make a decision that wouldn't be significant to her but might be for me. I don't think anyone should go meddling in another couple's relationship on that level." P, that is your _iew Mine is that I don't want a repeat of the last two experiences; those women saw things very differently from you I am not here to be 'dicreet' on behalf of the cheaters; they have been warned; so stay well away from me; I don't want to be involved in their sordid deceit What they do with others is none of my business | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If you have a boyfriend then you're not really single are you?? " You seem to misunderstand the purpose of 'single' and 'couple' profiles on this site. Single profiles are for people who are looking to meet alone. Couple profiles are for two (or more) people who are looking to meet together. One person can have multiple profiles, depending on the different people that they are planning to meet others with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How did the op end up with the subject matter changing completely ? All this single / couple etc..... " Some guy going on about married men shouldn't be allowed to say they are single on here .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee That I have a boyfriend who is fully aware that I am meeting single men and single women from a swingers site and that he is not involved when I meet with them. That I make it perfectly clear on my profile that I am in a relationship but meet by myself and don't hide anything from my boyfriend Once again, what is it that you do not comprehend about the above?" What is it I dont comprehend? Your sanctimoniousness really is not justified considering you're clearly not particularly straightforward about your own relationship status. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee That I have a boyfriend who is fully aware that I am meeting single men and single women from a swingers site and that he is not involved when I meet with them. That I make it perfectly clear on my profile that I am in a relationship but meet by myself and don't hide anything from my boyfriend Once again, what is it that you do not comprehend about the above? What is it I dont comprehend? Your sanctimoniousness really is not justified considering you're clearly not particularly straightforward about your own relationship status." Oh for heavens sake; read the f**kin' profile; it couldn't be any more bl**dy clearer than that I don't cheat on my boyfriend; my boyfriend doesn't cheat on me; and I don't meet cheaters; got it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Superfreak, what is it that you disapprove of exactly? Couples having singles profiles for their separate play? Or is it that it bothers you that people in agreed open relationship avoid those who are cheating behind their partners back? Mrs" I think he maybe can't get his head around married or otherwise attached couples having some individual space too ... trust and what swinging is all about, surely? And confusing single as a meet status and single as a relationship status in the real world | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee That I have a boyfriend who is fully aware that I am meeting single men and single women from a swingers site and that he is not involved when I meet with them. That I make it perfectly clear on my profile that I am in a relationship but meet by myself and don't hide anything from my boyfriend Once again, what is it that you do not comprehend about the above? What is it I dont comprehend? Your sanctimoniousness really is not justified considering you're clearly not particularly straightforward about your own relationship status. Oh for heavens sake; read the f**kin' profile; it couldn't be any more bl**dy clearer than that I don't cheat on my boyfriend; my boyfriend doesn't cheat on me; and I don't meet cheaters; got it?" But isnt this a bit different from what you said earlier too?? First it was about exposing cheaters and now u claim u dont see them. No offense, but it does seem like you're backpeddling as more people kinda question your stance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee That I have a boyfriend who is fully aware that I am meeting single men and single women from a swingers site and that he is not involved when I meet with them. That I make it perfectly clear on my profile that I am in a relationship but meet by myself and don't hide anything from my boyfriend Once again, what is it that you do not comprehend about the above? What is it I dont comprehend? Your sanctimoniousness really is not justified considering you're clearly not particularly straightforward about your own relationship status. Oh for heavens sake; read the f**kin' profile; it couldn't be any more bl**dy clearer than that I don't cheat on my boyfriend; my boyfriend doesn't cheat on me; and I don't meet cheaters; got it? But isnt this a bit different from what you said earlier too?? First it was about exposing cheaters and now u claim u dont see them. No offense, but it does seem like you're backpeddling as more people kinda question your stance. " You're the only one doing the questioning here. Everyone else seems perfectly capable of comprehending what is written. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee That I have a boyfriend who is fully aware that I am meeting single men and single women from a swingers site and that he is not involved when I meet with them. That I make it perfectly clear on my profile that I am in a relationship but meet by myself and don't hide anything from my boyfriend Once again, what is it that you do not comprehend about the above? What is it I dont comprehend? Your sanctimoniousness really is not justified considering you're clearly not particularly straightforward about your own relationship status. Oh for heavens sake; read the f**kin' profile; it couldn't be any more bl**dy clearer than that I don't cheat on my boyfriend; my boyfriend doesn't cheat on me; and I don't meet cheaters; got it? But isnt this a bit different from what you said earlier too?? First it was about exposing cheaters and now u claim u dont see them. No offense, but it does seem like you're backpeddling as more people kinda question your stance. You're the only one doing the questioning here. Everyone else seems perfectly capable of comprehending what is written." I agree. I see Josie as having totally explained her point and many of us here can agree to disagree and are interested in other peoples opinions, ever if they differ from ours .... maybe because we are women? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, it is the same in the real world. When I complete a form in the big-wide world, I tick, 'single'. The reason for this is, er, because I am single And: I am not looking for 'male affection'; I have a very nice boyfriend for that. LOL so which is it? This is exactly why I made the statement I did earlier. To the tee That I have a boyfriend who is fully aware that I am meeting single men and single women from a swingers site and that he is not involved when I meet with them. That I make it perfectly clear on my profile that I am in a relationship but meet by myself and don't hide anything from my boyfriend Once again, what is it that you do not comprehend about the above? What is it I dont comprehend? Your sanctimoniousness really is not justified considering you're clearly not particularly straightforward about your own relationship status. Oh for heavens sake; read the f**kin' profile; it couldn't be any more bl**dy clearer than that I don't cheat on my boyfriend; my boyfriend doesn't cheat on me; and I don't meet cheaters; got it? But isnt this a bit different from what you said earlier too?? First it was about exposing cheaters and now u claim u dont see them. No offense, but it does seem like you're backpeddling as more people kinda question your stance. " RTFP I have always maintained that I do not want to meet married or attached men; if one of them lies to me to meet me and I find out that is what he has done, then I will expose him to his partner; I will not be party to his cheating and suffer from the resultant fallout I have no interest in exposing cheaters who are not involving me in their cheating; they are none of my business I think your are being deliberately obtuse as nobody can be otherwise that thick People are welcome to question my stance and I am happy to explain the reason why I take that stance. I appreciate that we all differ in our _iews as these are formed by our individual experiences. It is a stance I have always taken and it is as clear as daylight on my profile and has been there ever since I first wrote It a couple of years ago! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |