FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Black Cocks
Black Cocks
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
 | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" All black guys??  | |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" 3 biggest cocks ive ever seen all belonged to white guys... and gorgeous is not a word I would use for anyones sexual organs | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" We all don't. Please, please don't let what you have seen in porn films or in your imagination run away with you. The 'bbc' isn't always big (whatever that may mean). | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! We all don't. Please, please don't let what you have seen in porn films or in your imagination run away with you. The 'bbc' isn't always big (whatever that may mean). " True, it is a phallacy  | |||
"You are deluded OP, cocks come in all shapes and sizes over all races" In the same way the human eyes come in all shapes and sizes over all races. However, can we say it is wrong to generalise that (not all) ; but MOST Orientals have slightly longer or wider eyes compared to other races? | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" Personally black cocks dnt appeal to me but I don't think all black cocks are big | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! Personally black cocks dnt appeal to me but I don't think all black cocks are big " Certainly not all black cocks are big. Even if that generalisation is true, there are always exceptions to every rule and generalisation. | |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" ive suck alot ov cock at the glory hole and tbh its all bull about black guys have bigger cock, | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! We all don't. Please, please don't let what you have seen in porn films or in your imagination run away with you. The 'bbc' isn't always big (whatever that may mean). True, it is a phallacy "A phallic phallacy | |||
"Actually the original Americans are the most well endowed. Black guys generally are but there's always expectations "That's interesting, didn't know that....learn something new every day  | |||
"You know I am starting to notice that any perceived sexual attractive trait that black men are claimed to possess are shot down on here. Whenever someone asks for some "BBC" there are always a gang of people on call to shoot it down. Jealousy is an amusing trait, especially considering where we are." I would shoot down any 'trait ' based on someone's race, weight, gender as they are nonsense . Most of the people who have commented are women - why would they be jealous of you having a big cock ? | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! ive suck alot ov cock at the glory hole and tbh its all bull about black guys have bigger cock, " Went have porn to thank for people assuming all black men have big ducks. | |||
" Went have porn to thank for people assuming all black men have big ducks. " It's quackers  | |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" Darwin Award winner | |||
"You know I am starting to notice that any perceived sexual attractive trait that black men are claimed to possess are shot down on here. Whenever someone asks for some "BBC" there are always a gang of people on call to shoot it down. Jealousy is an amusing trait, especially considering where we are." The problem with acknowledging supposed general traits that are positve, is that in order not to be a hypocrite you have to also acknowledge any negative ones. Would you do that? | |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" They don't. Some do. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" You've been watching to many porn movies. | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" We need a facepalm emoji | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! We need a facepalm emoji" So true lol | |||
| |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! 3 biggest cocks ive ever seen all belonged to white guys... and gorgeous is not a word I would use for anyones sexual organs "  | |||
| |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! We all don't. Please, please don't let what you have seen in porn films or in your imagination run away with you. The 'bbc' isn't always big (whatever that may mean). True, it is a phallacy
A phallic phallacy "I thought it was funny  | |||
| |||
| |||
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Lol they have the biggest heads too and l don't mean on the end of their cock!" Really??? Wow!! | |||
" Went have porn to thank for people assuming all black men have big ducks. It's quackers "Haha bloody autocorrect on my phone has a lot to answer for. | |||
| |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" On what do you base your theory OP? | |||
| |||
| |||
and yes I have seen white, a long time ago | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"The only explanation I ever saw for this apocryphal tale was that in hot countries people lose heat through the skin so anything that helps that grows. Consequently flacid black penises are longer than the equivalent white one although they do not extend as much as the short flacid white penises. I have to say though the biggest penis i ever had was a bbc. Very filling!!! "Sounds bogus to me. | |||
"I would say this Try not to think of it as an 'average' 'mean' of differing races ... White people may have a higher occurrence of really small cocks 1" or 2" ...but still have similar mean sizes and may even be white guy who has biggest in world. The point is darker skinned people have evolved to suit warmer climates, and that means their need to protect sperm may have led to some hanging out more, or competition in a harder environment may gave evolution the will to adapt it to suit. It's not race, it's nature. And the very need to argue over dick size is showing people warped view of the issue of sex. I'm hopeful black guys do have a slight edge as I want them to ruin Mrs for me .. So all good" There are parts of Asia that are hotter that parts of Africa and places like Death Valley in Arizona. Native Americans aren't know to have big ones. | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! ive suck alot ov cock at the glory hole and tbh its all bull about black guys have bigger cock, Went have porn to thank for people assuming all black men have big ducks. " Wouldn't it be nice if people shot down as quickly and in the same way other unhealthy and negative stereotypes about Black men like being labelled aggressive just because you speak up for yourself, being seen as unfaithful when it is not exclusively based on colour and oh, my personal favourite - seen as scary and dangerous. | |||
"Lol they have the biggest heads too and l don't mean on the end of their cock!" May the stereotyping continue by the most ignorant and narrow minded. | |||
| |||
"Lol they have the biggest heads too and l don't mean on the end of their cock! Really??? Wow!!" Thats essentially what I mean, people start to reveal themselves rather quickly in threads like these. | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X ""I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them" How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better. | |||
| |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
"Would you say it's okay for all races to accept positive stereotypes? lf white people did that about themselves you'd call them racist. | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Would you say it's okay for all races to accept positive stereotypes? lf white people did that about themselves you'd call them racist."I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there. | |||
| |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Would you say it's okay for all races to accept positive stereotypes? lf white people did that about themselves you'd call them racist.
I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there."So you think there are differences between races? What differences? | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Would you say it's okay for all races to accept positive stereotypes? lf white people did that about themselves you'd call them racist.
I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there.
So you think there are differences between races? What differences?"I think you want me to believe that there are a differences in races because, deep down, its what you believe but you're probably weaseling out of admitting your true feelings. Either way difference is inevitable, any idiot with even a passing awareness of biology, sociology or anthropology is well aware that geographical location can have considerable effects on everything from physical traits, to skull size, to even propensity for formation of complex civilizations. The only issue is most race scientists still focus on the rather outdated caucausoid, negroid and mongoloid sub-group classifications despite it being rather apparent that genealogy in, say africa, varies wildly. I have a somewhat passing feeling that you simply want to somehow say that if I can believe penis size can be correlated with race then it must mean that IQ and behavioural traits can correlate with race too. Hey, have at it. I've never done the all or nothing game. | |||
| |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Would you say it's okay for all races to accept positive stereotypes? lf white people did that about themselves you'd call them racist.
I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there.
So you think there are differences between races? What differences?
I think you want me to believe that there are a differences in races because, deep down, its what you believe but you're probably weaseling out of admitting your true feelings.
Either way difference is inevitable, any idiot with even a passing awareness of biology, sociology or anthropology is well aware that geographical location can have considerable effects on everything from physical traits, to skull size, to even propensity for formation of complex civilizations.
The only issue is most race scientists still focus on the rather outdated caucausoid, negroid and mongoloid sub-group classifications despite it being rather apparent that genealogy in, say africa, varies wildly.
I have a somewhat passing feeling that you simply want to somehow say that if I can believe penis size can be correlated with race then it must mean that IQ and behavioural traits can correlate with race too. Hey, have at it. I've never done the all or nothing game. "lf you were white, you'd be put through the ringer for saying that. l do think there could be truth to it. People say Britain's wealth is due to Empire but Germany never really had an Empire outside of Europe and they are rich. Brazil had more slaves from Africa than any other country and it's a total shithole and Portugal is pretty poor too. So there are so many exceptions. Ancient Rome and Greece were more advanced 2000 years ago than most countries were 200 years ago. And l don't think ''persecution'' is a valid excuse for underachieving. Jews were persecuted through history and they have been successful. 0.2% of America is Jewish but the have won 27% of their Nobel prizes. My mum's side are Jews and they are all bright, all passed their 11 plus exams and got scholarships etc. | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Lol don't cry it's not a insult it's just facts.ivaaid it's not about race yet you bring the (weak ass partner card into it) lol
If that was the other way around you would be screaming pc world.I won't share my body with someone I don't find sexually atractive.Has that hurt you? Yet it's ok for you to say no to who you don't want?
It's not about race colour or anything it's about the person and if you want to live of that silly myth then feel free but the only one that is admiting there a bid d*ck is you lol.
" | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"The only explanation I ever saw for this apocryphal tale was that in hot countries people lose heat through the skin so anything that helps that grows. Consequently flacid black penises are longer than the equivalent white one although they do not extend as much as the short flacid white penises. I have to say though the biggest penis i ever had was a bbc. Very filling!!!
Sounds bogus to me."Could be. I am not a scientist. Why do you think it happens? | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Lol don't cry it's not a insult it's just facts.ivaaid it's not about race yet you bring the (weak ass partner card into it) lol
If that was the other way around you would be screaming pc world.I won't share my body with someone I don't find sexually atractive.Has that hurt you? Yet it's ok for you to say no to who you don't want?
It's not about race colour or anything it's about the person and if you want to live of that silly myth then feel free but the only one that is admiting there a bid d*ck is you lol.
"No one cares about who you sleep with, I asked what is the basis for your conclusions when you claim you're not attracted to black or asian men? Surely that means you have not slept with any? Please dont think anyone is "hurt" by your preferences, you're not in any way enticing. | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Would you say it's okay for all races to accept positive stereotypes? lf white people did that about themselves you'd call them racist.
I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there.
So you think there are differences between races? What differences?
I think you want me to believe that there are a differences in races because, deep down, its what you believe but you're probably weaseling out of admitting your true feelings.
Either way difference is inevitable, any idiot with even a passing awareness of biology, sociology or anthropology is well aware that geographical location can have considerable effects on everything from physical traits, to skull size, to even propensity for formation of complex civilizations.
The only issue is most race scientists still focus on the rather outdated caucausoid, negroid and mongoloid sub-group classifications despite it being rather apparent that genealogy in, say africa, varies wildly.
I have a somewhat passing feeling that you simply want to somehow say that if I can believe penis size can be correlated with race then it must mean that IQ and behavioural traits can correlate with race too. Hey, have at it. I've never done the all or nothing game.
lf you were white, you'd be put through the ringer for saying that. l do think there could be truth to it.
People say Britain's wealth is due to Empire but Germany never really had an Empire outside of Europe and they are rich. Brazil had more slaves from Africa than any other country and it's a total shithole and Portugal is pretty poor too. So there are so many exceptions. Ancient Rome and Greece were more advanced 2000 years ago than most countries were 200 years ago.
And l don't think ''persecution'' is a valid excuse for underachieving. Jews were persecuted through history and they have been successful. 0.2% of America is Jewish but the have won 27% of their Nobel prizes. My mum's side are Jews and they are all bright, all passed their 11 plus exams and got scholarships etc. "Wait...what on earth does this have to do with my post? TBH I think you have alot of race based complexes. Your "persecution" argument (who said anything about persecution??) is left of field. Either way, as I already said, whilst I wont criticize you for it, its pretty apparent that you desperately need to believe that race and IQ hypothesis is real. I dont think my stance on race and penis size would have any effect on that opinion. Also, as a history buff. Your comparisons of Germany and the UK really go nowhere. Germany was realized after the consolidation of numerous warring states and had many strategic interests and foreign territories through which to extract wealth for some time. This argument is a fallacious one. To be honest it doesnt even make any sense. I think much of my post went completely over your head. | |||
Oh dear I'm really tired today isn't it home time yet lol! | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" I think it's just the black guys that bang on about their cocks more that why it seems only black guys have big cocks | |||
| |||
"I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there.
So you think there are differences between races? What differences?
I think you want me to believe that there are a differences in races because, deep down, its what you believe but you're probably weaseling out of admitting your true feelings.
Either way difference is inevitable, any idiot with even a passing awareness of biology, sociology or anthropology is well aware that geographical location can have considerable effects on everything from physical traits, to skull size, to even propensity for formation of complex civilizations.
The only issue is most race scientists still focus on the rather outdated caucausoid, negroid and mongoloid sub-group classifications despite it being rather apparent that genealogy in, say africa, varies wildly.
I have a somewhat passing feeling that you simply want to somehow say that if I can believe penis size can be correlated with race then it must mean that IQ and behavioural traits can correlate with race too. Hey, have at it. I've never done the all or nothing game.
lf you were white, you'd be put through the ringer for saying that. l do think there could be truth to it.
People say Britain's wealth is due to Empire but Germany never really had an Empire outside of Europe and they are rich. Brazil had more slaves from Africa than any other country and it's a total shithole and Portugal is pretty poor too. So there are so many exceptions. Ancient Rome and Greece were more advanced 2000 years ago than most countries were 200 years ago.
And l don't think ''persecution'' is a valid excuse for underachieving. Jews were persecuted through history and they have been successful. 0.2% of America is Jewish but the have won 27% of their Nobel prizes. My mum's side are Jews and they are all bright, all passed their 11 plus exams and got scholarships etc.
Wait...what on earth does this have to do with my post? TBH I think you have alot of race based complexes. Your "persecution" argument (who said anything about persecution??) is left of field. Either way, as I already said, whilst I wont criticize you for it, its pretty apparent that you desperately need to believe that race and IQ hypothesis is real. I dont think my stance on race and penis size would have any effect on that opinion.
Also, as a history buff. Your comparisons of Germany and the UK really go nowhere. Germany was realized after the consolidation of numerous warring states and had many strategic interests and foreign territories through which to extract wealth for some time. This argument is a fallacious one. To be honest it doesnt even make any sense. I think much of my post went completely over your head."Not really. l don't think it went over your head, l just think it made you uncomfortable. You never answered any claim other than the Germany one and answered it wrong. You said '' Germany was realized after the consolidation of numerous warring states and had many strategic interests and foreign territories through which to extract wealth for some time.'' You are a history buff? Wales, England, lreland and Scotland have never been warring states that capitulated into the union? The Holy Roman empire was in existence far far before any union of Britain. Germany is just a name. lt was a union long before that name. Germany's empire was just the surrounding Germanic peoples and some Slavic states. Not in Asia or the Americas and only very shortly in Africa. You never answered a thing. ''Your "persecution" argument (who said anything about persecution??) is left of field.'' So? lt's a valid one that dismantles the notion of oppression being the sole cause for failure. Over 5 millions Jews were murdered and within 30 years they created a state more advanced than any of the surrounding ones managed in 2000....without oil. This is usually when the conspiracies get brought up to explain it. | |||
 | |||
"I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there.
So you think there are differences between races? What differences?
I think you want me to believe that there are a differences in races because, deep down, its what you believe but you're probably weaseling out of admitting your true feelings.
Either way difference is inevitable, any idiot with even a passing awareness of biology, sociology or anthropology is well aware that geographical location can have considerable effects on everything from physical traits, to skull size, to even propensity for formation of complex civilizations.
The only issue is most race scientists still focus on the rather outdated caucausoid, negroid and mongoloid sub-group classifications despite it being rather apparent that genealogy in, say africa, varies wildly.
I have a somewhat passing feeling that you simply want to somehow say that if I can believe penis size can be correlated with race then it must mean that IQ and behavioural traits can correlate with race too. Hey, have at it. I've never done the all or nothing game.
lf you were white, you'd be put through the ringer for saying that. l do think there could be truth to it.
People say Britain's wealth is due to Empire but Germany never really had an Empire outside of Europe and they are rich. Brazil had more slaves from Africa than any other country and it's a total shithole and Portugal is pretty poor too. So there are so many exceptions. Ancient Rome and Greece were more advanced 2000 years ago than most countries were 200 years ago.
And l don't think ''persecution'' is a valid excuse for underachieving. Jews were persecuted through history and they have been successful. 0.2% of America is Jewish but the have won 27% of their Nobel prizes. My mum's side are Jews and they are all bright, all passed their 11 plus exams and got scholarships etc.
Wait...what on earth does this have to do with my post? TBH I think you have alot of race based complexes. Your "persecution" argument (who said anything about persecution??) is left of field. Either way, as I already said, whilst I wont criticize you for it, its pretty apparent that you desperately need to believe that race and IQ hypothesis is real. I dont think my stance on race and penis size would have any effect on that opinion.
Also, as a history buff. Your comparisons of Germany and the UK really go nowhere. Germany was realized after the consolidation of numerous warring states and had many strategic interests and foreign territories through which to extract wealth for some time. This argument is a fallacious one. To be honest it doesnt even make any sense. I think much of my post went completely over your head.
Not really. l don't think it went over your head, l just think it made you uncomfortable. You never answered any claim other than the Germany one and answered it wrong. You said '' Germany was realized after the consolidation of numerous warring states and had many strategic interests and foreign territories through which to extract wealth for some time.''
You are a history buff? Wales, England, lreland and Scotland have never been warring states that capitulated into the union? The Holy Roman empire was in existence far far before any union of Britain. Germany is just a name. lt was a union long before that name. Germany's empire was just the surrounding Germanic peoples and some Slavic states. Not in Asia or the Americas and only very shortly in Africa.
You never answered a thing.
''Your "persecution" argument (who said anything about persecution??) is left of field.'' So? lt's a valid one that dismantles the notion of oppression being the sole cause for failure. Over 5 millions Jews were murdered and within 30 years they created a state more advanced than any of the surrounding ones managed in 2000....without oil. This is usually when the conspiracies get brought up to explain it. "You've jumpEd from race and I to "failure". Please inform me where this line of discussion came from? I argued about links between race and IQ and you've jumped onto a completely separate tangent. What did my argument have to do with the success or failure of "African " states? As said you have rave based complexes but you're too much of a weasel to be honest about them. Using Ashkenazi Jews as an excuse for colonialism (which you clearly feel guilty about hence your need to rationalise) is a complete non-sequitur. Jews were influential long before the second world war. Considering their ethno-religious origin made them rather unique means that they cannot be used as any kind of comparison to other ethnic groups. The mentioning of oil also makes your intellect seem rather shallow. European control and bottlenecking of the African continent did not start and stop with oil. In fact it's been posited that the real blow to development came from the carving of the continent which lead to fierce rivalries among tribes which lives in relative peace (due to both the vastness, smaller population density and the scarcity of arable land). But go on and keep enforcing the IQ hypothesis that you desperately cling to. And, in regards to the Jewish state, let's not pretend as if AIPAC and loyal support from the US military industrial machine wasn't largely influential in that. Last I remembered Israel was almost wiped out during the six day war until the US thankfully bailed them out. I don't know how the argument even got here. I said the penis size myth has been largely fueled by racists iatrogenic hysteria and yet here u are getting upset about it. But hey, maybe that myth is based on truth. You say if I believe the validity of that myth I must also believe race and IQ difference. TBH I never even said I didn't, merely that the anthropological barometer of race has changed fundamentally...so much so that the racial subgroups (that much of race IQ hypotheses are based on) is rather old science. You then went on about the success of certain racial groups and their capacity for statehood...but how does this even address my argument? Other than a hokey attempt at linking race to capacity for civilisation. Problem with this (pointless) argument is that it's 30 years behind the times. Even amongst old school conservative thinkers, geography, accountability, institutional efficiency and military might are far more influential thanot race are. Invest in a library card. | |||
"I think alot of stereotypes may come from a place of truth. What exactly is even "positive" about a larger penis? In classical greek society, large appendages were actually seen as unseemly and animalistic. Whats even more amusing is that white supremacist racism during the Jim Crow era and the irrational fear of black men "taking" white women is what gave the very myth legs to stand on. So you only have white people to blame
As an ethnic minority, I will inevitably find myself attached to both positive and negative stereotypes. I find it intriguing that white people sit and get angry that the stereotypes they perpetuate dont benefit them exclusively. Strong sense of entitlement there.
So you think there are differences between races? What differences?
I think you want me to believe that there are a differences in races because, deep down, its what you believe but you're probably weaseling out of admitting your true feelings.
Either way difference is inevitable, any idiot with even a passing awareness of biology, sociology or anthropology is well aware that geographical location can have considerable effects on everything from physical traits, to skull size, to even propensity for formation of complex civilizations.
The only issue is most race scientists still focus on the rather outdated caucausoid, negroid and mongoloid sub-group classifications despite it being rather apparent that genealogy in, say africa, varies wildly.
I have a somewhat passing feeling that you simply want to somehow say that if I can believe penis size can be correlated with race then it must mean that IQ and behavioural traits can correlate with race too. Hey, have at it. I've never done the all or nothing game.
lf you were white, you'd be put through the ringer for saying that. l do think there could be truth to it.
People say Britain's wealth is due to Empire but Germany never really had an Empire outside of Europe and they are rich. Brazil had more slaves from Africa than any other country and it's a total shithole and Portugal is pretty poor too. So there are so many exceptions. Ancient Rome and Greece were more advanced 2000 years ago than most countries were 200 years ago.
And l don't think ''persecution'' is a valid excuse for underachieving. Jews were persecuted through history and they have been successful. 0.2% of America is Jewish but the have won 27% of their Nobel prizes. My mum's side are Jews and they are all bright, all passed their 11 plus exams and got scholarships etc.
Wait...what on earth does this have to do with my post? TBH I think you have alot of race based complexes. Your "persecution" argument (who said anything about persecution??) is left of field. Either way, as I already said, whilst I wont criticize you for it, its pretty apparent that you desperately need to believe that race and IQ hypothesis is real. I dont think my stance on race and penis size would have any effect on that opinion.
Also, as a history buff. Your comparisons of Germany and the UK really go nowhere. Germany was realized after the consolidation of numerous warring states and had many strategic interests and foreign territories through which to extract wealth for some time. This argument is a fallacious one. To be honest it doesnt even make any sense. I think much of my post went completely over your head.
Not really. l don't think it went over your head, l just think it made you uncomfortable. You never answered any claim other than the Germany one and answered it wrong. You said '' Germany was realized after the consolidation of numerous warring states and had many strategic interests and foreign territories through which to extract wealth for some time.''
You are a history buff? Wales, England, lreland and Scotland have never been warring states that capitulated into the union? The Holy Roman empire was in existence far far before any union of Britain. Germany is just a name. lt was a union long before that name. Germany's empire was just the surrounding Germanic peoples and some Slavic states. Not in Asia or the Americas and only very shortly in Africa.
You never answered a thing.
''Your "persecution" argument (who said anything about persecution??) is left of field.'' So? lt's a valid one that dismantles the notion of oppression being the sole cause for failure. Over 5 millions Jews were murdered and within 30 years they created a state more advanced than any of the surrounding ones managed in 2000....without oil. This is usually when the conspiracies get brought up to explain it.
You've jumpEd from race and I to "failure". Please inform me where this line of discussion came from? I argued about links between race and IQ and you've jumped onto a completely separate tangent. What did my argument have to do with the success or failure of "African " states? As said you have rave based complexes but you're too much of a weasel to be honest about them.
Using Ashkenazi Jews as an excuse for colonialism (which you clearly feel guilty about hence your need to rationalise) is a complete non-sequitur. Jews were influential long before the second world war. Considering their ethno-religious origin made them rather unique means that they cannot be used as any kind of comparison to other ethnic groups. The mentioning of oil also makes your intellect seem rather shallow. European control and bottlenecking of the African continent did not start and stop with oil. In fact it's been posited that the real blow to development came from the carving of the continent which lead to fierce rivalries among tribes which lives in relative peace (due to both the vastness, smaller population density and the scarcity of arable land). But go on and keep enforcing the IQ hypothesis that you desperately cling to.
And, in regards to the Jewish state, let's not pretend as if AIPAC and loyal support from the US military industrial machine wasn't largely influential in that. Last I remembered Israel was almost wiped out during the six day war until the US thankfully bailed them out.
I don't know how the argument even got here. I said the penis size myth has been largely fueled by racists iatrogenic hysteria and yet here u are getting upset about it. But hey, maybe that myth is based on truth. You say if I believe the validity of that myth I must also believe race and IQ difference. TBH I never even said I didn't, merely that the anthropological barometer of race has changed fundamentally...so much so that the racial subgroups (that much of race IQ hypotheses are based on) is rather old science. You then went on about the success of certain racial groups and their capacity for statehood...but how does this even address my argument? Other than a hokey attempt at linking race to capacity for civilisation. Problem with this (pointless) argument is that it's 30 years behind the times. Even amongst old school conservative thinkers, geography, accountability, institutional efficiency and military might are far more influential thanot race are.
Invest in a library card."Where would we be without Wikipedia | |||
| |||
"I recently had the pleasure of playing with my first Big Black Cock, and my thoughts... There's something a little taboo about being with a black guy, sure it's just a difference of skin colour, but it still adds a tiny bit of the 'forbidden' to the experience which just makes it more fun. This black guy in particular had a big, gorgeous dick, and I honestly didn't even notice the colour, it was a quality cock, and that's what matters. He was firm in the way he fucked, but surprisingly gentle. He had a bodybuilders physique - say no more. I very much enjoyed the experience and would love to do it again, but I don't attribute this to the guy being black, just that HE, the individual, was exceptionally hot. It's quite jammy of me really, that my first ever gay experience with a black guy, was with one whom likely fit most people fantasy of a tall, powerful, sensual, ebony warrior with a handsome face and glowing smile "Why is it taboo ? It's 2016 and these days it's the norm to see mixed couples. Going back 26 yrs ago when I dated a black guy ... well that was slightly different then | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Lol don't cry it's not a insult it's just facts.ivaaid it's not about race yet you bring the (weak ass partner card into it) lol
If that was the other way around you would be screaming pc world.I won't share my body with someone I don't find sexually atractive.Has that hurt you? Yet it's ok for you to say no to who you don't want?
It's not about race colour or anything it's about the person and if you want to live of that silly myth then feel free but the only one that is admiting there a bid d*ck is you lol.
No one cares about who you sleep with, I asked what is the basis for your conclusions when you claim you're not attracted to black or asian men? Surely that means you have not slept with any?
Please dont think anyone is "hurt" by your preferences, you're not in any way enticing. "I haven't slept with any and don't want too.Its just not my prefrance.You ask what I judge my views on in this topic well that's simple facts.I have looked at your pics and my bf is white and his ;/) is a lot bigger than yours.Now that's a simple fact.Im not racist in anyway shape or form I'm idiotist and your coming over like a idiot.If you want to live of that myth then feel free to do so but only the stupid will believe it.All body's come in different shapes and sizes no matter what race and as I said previously the boy at school that got teased by the idiot bully's was a coloured boy and they teased him as his was tiny and they called him maggot.Now that type of bullying is descusting but there's another simple fact.Not all people of a certain race have big.Its just some do off all races so carry on preaching your ego drivel as it don't wash with me or anyone else with half a brain cell. | |||
" You've jumpEd from race and I to "failure". Please inform me where this line of discussion came from? I argued about links between race and IQ and you've jumped onto a completely separate tangent. What did my argument have to do with the success or failure of "African " states? As said you have rave based complexes but you're too much of a weasel to be honest about them. Using Ashkenazi Jews as an excuse for colonialism (which you clearly feel guilty about hence your need to rationalise) is a complete non-sequitur. Jews were influential long before the second world war. Considering their ethno-religious origin made them rather unique means that they cannot be used as any kind of comparison to other ethnic groups. The mentioning of oil also makes your intellect seem rather shallow. European control and bottlenecking of the African continent did not start and stop with oil. In fact it's been posited that the real blow to development came from the carving of the continent which lead to fierce rivalries among tribes which lives in relative peace (due to both the vastness, smaller population density and the scarcity of arable land). But go on and keep enforcing the IQ hypothesis that you desperately cling to. And, in regards to the Jewish state, let's not pretend as if AIPAC and loyal support from the US military industrial machine wasn't largely influential in that. Last I remembered Israel was almost wiped out during the six day war until the US thankfully bailed them out. I don't know how the argument even got here. I said the penis size myth has been largely fueled by racists iatrogenic hysteria and yet here u are getting upset about it. But hey, maybe that myth is based on truth. You say if I believe the validity of that myth I must also believe race and IQ difference. TBH I never even said I didn't, merely that the anthropological barometer of race has changed fundamentally...so much so that the racial subgroups (that much of race IQ hypotheses are based on) is rather old science. You then went on about the success of certain racial groups and their capacity for statehood...but how does this even address my argument? Other than a hokey attempt at linking race to capacity for civilisation. Problem with this (pointless) argument is that it's 30 years behind the times. Even amongst old school conservative thinkers, geography, accountability, institutional efficiency and military might are far more influential thanot race are. Invest in a library card." Maybe you fail to think outside of parallel lines if you can't apply extension of an argument and the logical consequences of a point you make. Read up: you state you think there are differences in race, therefore if there are difference in race, then differences in civilizations which were until recently, racially - to a large degree - very homogeneous, can be examined in this context. What you deem as a tangent is a mere natural extension of an argument. Just because you didn't like the implications, don't then whine about 'changing' the subject. l don't feel guilty for colonialism (why would l?) All peoples have colonised and been colonised. ''And, in regards to the Jewish state, let's not pretend as if AIPAC and loyal support from the US military industrial machine wasn't largely influential in that. Last I remembered Israel was almost wiped out during the six day war until the US thankfully bailed them out.'' There are those conspiracies l talked about haha. ''Using Ashkenazi Jews as an excuse for colonialism (which you clearly feel guilty about hence your need to rationalise) is a complete non-sequitur. Jews were influential long before the second world war. Considering their ethno-religious origin made them rather unique means that they cannot be used as any kind of comparison to other ethnic groups. The mentioning of oil also makes your intellect seem rather shallow. European control and bottlenecking of the African continent did not start and stop with oil. In fact it's been posited that the real blow to development came from the carving of the continent which lead to fierce rivalries among tribes which lives in relative peace'' l think l now know that you don't really know what you are on about, do you? When Europeans ''carved up Africa'' lt was post Renaissance in Europe and there had been pinnacles of civilisation in Europe and the Near East, so any ''stifling'' was well after Europeans and Asian countries developed to a high lever: yet Africa did not. How can you blame Europe for Africa being behind them in advancement when they first started colonising it? Circular fallacious logic. 1 l wasn't taking about African oil but Arabic oil which lsrael has none and still made a greater society. 2 Do you think the persecution of the Ashkenazi started in 1935? The use of the Ashkenazim is very valid for a number of reason and one being genetic bottlenecks and distinnct gene pools of said group. You still don't address a single thing. You were badly wrong about Germany and never adressed Brazil. You haven't brought anything to the table other than ''You are wrong''. You haven't explained why some colonial powers aren't rich and some colonies (like South Korea and Singapore) are. The reason behind the Ashkenazim's success and Africa's stagnation to an era before the Renaissance. | |||
"There was a black boy when I was at school and all the other boys would call him maggot as he had a tiny
So it's not the race it's just what your born with.
The colour black is a optical illusion paste in art due to it makes objects look bigger to the brain.
Draw to objects the same size and colour one in white and one black and your brain will tell you the black one is bigger.Its just the way the brain works.
There are black guys with big and also white guy's with big.
it's a myth that a certain race has a bigger so do t pay attetion to the rubbish you hear X
"I'm not into black or Asians I'm not racist but I'm just not sexually attracted to them"
How would you know anything about black penis size if you are "not interested in black or asian men"?? As stated, for many people, any asset/attribute that is deemed "positive" for black men must be shot down and tempered to make themselves (or their weak ass partners) feel better.
Lol don't cry it's not a insult it's just facts.ivaaid it's not about race yet you bring the (weak ass partner card into it) lol
If that was the other way around you would be screaming pc world.I won't share my body with someone I don't find sexually atractive.Has that hurt you? Yet it's ok for you to say no to who you don't want?
It's not about race colour or anything it's about the person and if you want to live of that silly myth then feel free but the only one that is admiting there a bid d*ck is you lol.
No one cares about who you sleep with, I asked what is the basis for your conclusions when you claim you're not attracted to black or asian men? Surely that means you have not slept with any?
Please dont think anyone is "hurt" by your preferences, you're not in any way enticing.
I haven't slept with any and don't want too.Its just not my prefrance.You ask what I judge my views on in this topic well that's simple facts.I have looked at your pics and my bf is white and his ;/) is a lot bigger than yours.Now that's a simple fact.Im not racist in anyway shape or form I'm idiotist and your coming over like a idiot.If you want to live of that myth then feel free to do so but only the stupid will believe it.All body's come in different shapes and sizes no matter what race and as I said previously the boy at school that got teased by the idiot bully's was a coloured boy and they teased him as his was tiny and they called him maggot.Now that type of bullying is descusting but there's another simple fact.Not all people of a certain race have big.Its just some do off all races so carry on preaching your ego drivel as it don't wash with me or anyone else with half a brain cell."Again you're justifying your preferences. You're, quite frankly, not attractive enough for me to care. | |||
" Maybe you fail to think outside of parallel lines if you can't apply extension of an argument and the logical consequences of a point you make. Read up: you state you think there are differences in race, therefore if there are difference in race, then differences in civilizations which were until recently, racially - to a large degree - very homogeneous, can be examined in this context. What you deem as a tangent is a mere natural extension of an argument. Just because you didn't like the implications, don't then whine about 'changing' the subject." Classical civilisations were "largely homogenous". Are you being serious with this statement?? As said, invest in a library card. You're out of your depth. Even the country you live in, the United Kingdom, was in no way homogenous and hasnt been for a millenia. The pre-Celts, Celts, Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Norse and the Normans and then even when you consider the fact that much of the genetic makeup of this country can be traced back to Basque peoples of southern europe, you still dont have a concensus. Since many of those are made up of various different groups. "l don't feel guilty for colonialism (why would l?) All peoples have colonised and been colonised." Is that so? Then why the need to pre-emptively justify it? "There are those conspiracies l talked about haha. " US support of Israel is a conspiracy now? Even during the six day war? Ok. "l think l now know that you don't really know what you are on about, do you? When Europeans ''carved up Africa'' lt was post Renaissance in Europe and there had been pinnacles of civilisation in Europe and the Near East, so any ''stifling'' was well after Europeans and Asian countries developed to a high lever: yet Africa did not. How can you blame Europe for Africa being behind them in advancement when they first started colonising it? Circular fallacious logic." So there was no civilisation in Africa prior to European colonialism? Really? Did you even read my post? The differnece between Africa and say, Europe or China, was simply the fact that statehood never reached the breadth or capacity that it achieved in Europe or central asia. Once again, as stated, this was largely due to factors involving geography. Lack of arable land, vastness, low population density and a lack of flat terrain. Centralized states were fewer in number and political/social influence but that doesnt mean they did not exist. China and Europe both benefited from large population density, domestication and flat accessible terrain from which states could affect control over large populations. Logic is not circular when it no longer exists within your narrow grasp of fact. The "third wave" of colonial extraction bled the African continent dry its cost cutting methods of resource extraction and control by proxy simply as a means of fighting off other competing European states. The locking in of numerous social and ethnic groups in artificial states which had little in the way of functional institutions (due to the cheap, cost cutting nature of european states which held control) or any real influence outside of the competing warlords who never really went beyond enacting clientilistic forms of political control. "l wasn't taking about African oil but Arabic oil which lsrael has none and still made a greater society. 2 Do you think the persecution of the Ashkenazi started in 1935? The use of the Ashkenazim is very valid for a number of reason and one being genetic bottlenecks and distinnct gene pools of said group." Are you insecure about your heritage? I made this point already. Ashkenazi jews have a unique ethnic makeup which has seen much of their population actually shrink during much of its history. This is unique. Why is this being used as a barometer of anything? Jewish success in the realms of business likely have far more to do with cultural expectations and Jewish ethno-religious values which centre around education and questioning than it does with race. Just like Chinese students vaastly outperform other asian ethnic groups because of the large role confuscianism played in shaping Chinese identity during the Han dynasty. "You still don't address a single thing. You were badly wrong about Germany and never adressed Brazil. You haven't brought anything to the table other than ''You are wrong''. You haven't explained why some colonial powers aren't rich and some colonies (like South Korea and Singapore) are. The reason behind the Ashkenazim's success and Africa's stagnation to an era before the Renaissance." Badly wrong about Germany? How? Confirm which point I made which was factually incorrect. Why mention Brazil? Its lack of economic development prior to its recent rise as a BRIC nation has much more to do with the lack of formation of strong institutions due to the very incompetent nature Portuguese colonial methods. Hence why you find the same dysfunction in modern day southern Europe...with Spain, Portugal and Italy struggling financially. South Korea and Singapore and VERY recent succes stories which say much more about the failure of democracy and effective strategy than it does about race (as much as you dont want to believe that. Following the second world war, large swathes of investment and a hard working culture which was seen over by a non-democratic military regime which forced through a number policies in business which meant that corporations felt a sense of civic duty toward to population whereas in Africa, post war regimes were motsly run by violent robber barons who cared more about killing off rival ethnic groups and raiding state coffers than doing shit for the population. And lets not forget the threat of communism in the North, South Korean and Japanese revival was key in keeping communism at bay in the pacific. | |||
| |||
"It's all in the mind though. We used to see a black guy regularly who was drop dead gorgeous with an amazing body. His cock was a nice shape and he used it well. But it was extremely average in size and my husband is certainly much bigger. But he had a verification list as long as my arm, with several references to how well endowed he was. I realised then that people believe what they want to believe. Mrs " I'm gonna have to start using this one, "no ladies, I'm not average, I'm... Extremely average " | |||
"Wow that escalated quickly "You can say that again! | |||
| |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person!" It's a myth. | |||
"I recently had the pleasure of playing with my first Big Black Cock, and my thoughts... There's something a little taboo about being with a black guy, sure it's just a difference of skin colour, but it still adds a tiny bit of the 'forbidden' to the experience which just makes it more fun. This black guy in particular had a big, gorgeous dick, and I honestly didn't even notice the colour, it was a quality cock, and that's what matters. He was firm in the way he fucked, but surprisingly gentle. He had a bodybuilders physique - say no more. I very much enjoyed the experience and would love to do it again, but I don't attribute this to the guy being black, just that HE, the individual, was exceptionally hot. It's quite jammy of me really, that my first ever gay experience with a black guy, was with one whom likely fit most people fantasy of a tall, powerful, sensual, ebony warrior with a handsome face and glowing smile "It's funny that you state that your experience had nothing to do with him being black but in the same breath say that the fact that he was black and the forbidden aspect contributed to the fun. That's very contradictory. To be honest, I find it annoying when people say stupid shit like it's forbidden. We are talking about people here and the fetishisation should stop. The fact that people still hold such antiquated, backward and ignorant ideas concocted by a bunch of idiots who were in no way civilised is beyond me. When are people going to start being open minded about life and the people on this planet. For God's sake, you would think 2016 was the first time White prior laid eyes on a Black man | |||
| |||
"I recently had the pleasure of playing with my first Big Black Cock, and my thoughts... There's something a little taboo about being with a black guy, sure it's just a difference of skin colour, but it still adds a tiny bit of the 'forbidden' to the experience which just makes it more fun. This black guy in particular had a big, gorgeous dick, and I honestly didn't even notice the colour, it was a quality cock, and that's what matters. He was firm in the way he fucked, but surprisingly gentle. He had a bodybuilders physique - say no more. I very much enjoyed the experience and would love to do it again, but I don't attribute this to the guy being black, just that HE, the individual, was exceptionally hot. It's quite jammy of me really, that my first ever gay experience with a black guy, was with one whom likely fit most people fantasy of a tall, powerful, sensual, ebony warrior with a handsome face and glowing smile
It's funny that you state that your experience had nothing to do with him being black but in the same breath say that the fact that he was black and the forbidden aspect contributed to the fun. That's very contradictory."It is contradictory, but it was the only way I could properly describe my feelings about the experience. You may have noticed that I refer to the fact that I enjoyed it because the person I met was sexually exciting, he just happened to be a different colour to me, which I suppose, may have been the 'taboo' part, after all, it's always a little extra erotic when you have sex with another race, because it's just that little bit different, I mean, your DNAs developed in different parts of the world for thousands and thousands of years, and you were brought together through mutual desire for one another, I find something especially exciting about that. | |||
"I recently had the pleasure of playing with my first Big Black Cock, and my thoughts... There's something a little taboo about being with a black guy, sure it's just a difference of skin colour, but it still adds a tiny bit of the 'forbidden' to the experience which just makes it more fun. This black guy in particular had a big, gorgeous dick, and I honestly didn't even notice the colour, it was a quality cock, and that's what matters. He was firm in the way he fucked, but surprisingly gentle. He had a bodybuilders physique - say no more. I very much enjoyed the experience and would love to do it again, but I don't attribute this to the guy being black, just that HE, the individual, was exceptionally hot. It's quite jammy of me really, that my first ever gay experience with a black guy, was with one whom likely fit most people fantasy of a tall, powerful, sensual, ebony warrior with a handsome face and glowing smile
It's funny that you state that your experience had nothing to do with him being black but in the same breath say that the fact that he was black and the forbidden aspect contributed to the fun. That's very contradictory.
It is contradictory, but it was the only way I could properly describe my feelings about the experience. You may have noticed that I refer to the fact that I enjoyed it because the person I met was sexually exciting, he just happened to be a different colour to me, which I suppose, may have been the 'taboo' part, after all, it's always a little extra erotic when you have sex with another race, because it's just that little bit different, I mean, your DNAs developed in different parts of the world for thousands and thousands of years, and you were brought together through mutual desire for one another, I find something especially exciting about that."Ok, for your information we are not another race just a different colour. To be another race, we'd have to be from another planet. I sort of understand how the visual difference can be appealing to you or anyone. After all, we are human. | |||
"Wow that escalated quickly "Well sometimes things have to escalate for people to learn a little truth. I personally find it abominable that in this day and age where information is readily at our fingertips, people still exhibit such ignorance. | |||
| |||
"I recently had the pleasure of playing with my first Big Black Cock, and my thoughts... There's something a little taboo about being with a black guy, sure it's just a difference of skin colour, but it still adds a tiny bit of the 'forbidden' to the experience which just makes it more fun. This black guy in particular had a big, gorgeous dick, and I honestly didn't even notice the colour, it was a quality cock, and that's what matters. He was firm in the way he fucked, but surprisingly gentle. He had a bodybuilders physique - say no more. I very much enjoyed the experience and would love to do it again, but I don't attribute this to the guy being black, just that HE, the individual, was exceptionally hot. It's quite jammy of me really, that my first ever gay experience with a black guy, was with one whom likely fit most people fantasy of a tall, powerful, sensual, ebony warrior with a handsome face and glowing smile
It's funny that you state that your experience had nothing to do with him being black but in the same breath say that the fact that he was black and the forbidden aspect contributed to the fun. That's very contradictory.
It is contradictory, but it was the only way I could properly describe my feelings about the experience. You may have noticed that I refer to the fact that I enjoyed it because the person I met was sexually exciting, he just happened to be a different colour to me, which I suppose, may have been the 'taboo' part, after all, it's always a little extra erotic when you have sex with another race, because it's just that little bit different, I mean, your DNAs developed in different parts of the world for thousands and thousands of years, and you were brought together through mutual desire for one another, I find something especially exciting about that.
Ok, for your information we are not another race just a different colour. To be another race, we'd have to be from another planet. I sort of understand how the visual difference can be appealing to you or anyone. After all, we are human. "I don't think you fully understand me, or perhaps I'm just not explaining very well, but I assure you I don't treat peoples ethnicity as some sort of fetish, but I will agree with you on the human part, we're still evolving, we still can't see fully past racial differences in order to simply define ourselves as Earthlings, but in the meantime, is it so bad to ACCEPT one anothers differences, and ENJOY them? | |||
"I recently had the pleasure of playing with my first Big Black Cock, and my thoughts... There's something a little taboo about being with a black guy, sure it's just a difference of skin colour, but it still adds a tiny bit of the 'forbidden' to the experience which just makes it more fun. This black guy in particular had a big, gorgeous dick, and I honestly didn't even notice the colour, it was a quality cock, and that's what matters. He was firm in the way he fucked, but surprisingly gentle. He had a bodybuilders physique - say no more. I very much enjoyed the experience and would love to do it again, but I don't attribute this to the guy being black, just that HE, the individual, was exceptionally hot. It's quite jammy of me really, that my first ever gay experience with a black guy, was with one whom likely fit most people fantasy of a tall, powerful, sensual, ebony warrior with a handsome face and glowing smile
It's funny that you state that your experience had nothing to do with him being black but in the same breath say that the fact that he was black and the forbidden aspect contributed to the fun. That's very contradictory.
It is contradictory, but it was the only way I could properly describe my feelings about the experience. You may have noticed that I refer to the fact that I enjoyed it because the person I met was sexually exciting, he just happened to be a different colour to me, which I suppose, may have been the 'taboo' part, after all, it's always a little extra erotic when you have sex with another race, because it's just that little bit different, I mean, your DNAs developed in different parts of the world for thousands and thousands of years, and you were brought together through mutual desire for one another, I find something especially exciting about that.
Ok, for your information we are not another race just a different colour. To be another race, we'd have to be from another planet. I sort of understand how the visual difference can be appealing to you or anyone. After all, we are human.
I don't think you fully understand me, or perhaps I'm just not explaining very well, but I assure you I don't treat peoples ethnicity as some sort of fetish, but I will agree with you on the human part, we're still evolving, we still can't see fully past racial differences in order to simply define ourselves as Earthlings, but in the meantime, is it so bad to ACCEPT one anothers differences, and ENJOY them?"On the contrary, I understand you very well and there's nothing wrong with accepting differences and enjoying them (that's what everyone should do) provided you don't see it as taboo or whatever cos that's fetishisation. The fact that you think I see it as bad tells me you don't understand my point at all. But we are still one race, | |||
"Why do black guys have so large and gorgeous cocks? Not that Ive ever met one in person! ive suck alot ov cock at the glory hole and tbh its all bull about black guys have bigger cock, Went have porn to thank for people assuming all black men have big ducks. Wouldn't it be nice if people shot down as quickly and in the same way other unhealthy and negative stereotypes about Black men like being labelled aggressive just because you speak up for yourself, being seen as unfaithful when it is not exclusively based on colour and oh, my personal favourite - seen as scary and dangerous." Bang on friend. Thats the point assumption and steriotyping never ends well. When we are lazy in our thinking (easier to assume than think) we fall down and smack our face. Assumptions based on Race tend to attract an unpleasent label. However if the label fits.... | |||
"You know I am starting to notice that any perceived sexual attractive trait that black men are claimed to possess are shot down on here. Whenever someone asks for some "BBC" there are always a gang of people on call to shoot it down. Jealousy is an amusing trait, especially considering where we are." Your positive attributes are based on you not a steriotype assumption encompassing millions of people. While being black is as positive an attribute (and clearly no less) as any other race. Is it the basis on which you desire the world to see you, or would you not prefer that that veiw of you was based on the enirety of who you are. I called the OP assumption out as myth as all assumptions lead to a face smack! When they are based on race it leads to an unhappy place. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"I recently had the pleasure of playing with my first Big Black Cock, and my thoughts... There's something a little taboo about being with a black guy, sure it's just a difference of skin colour, but it still adds a tiny bit of the 'forbidden' to the experience which just makes it more fun. This black guy in particular had a big, gorgeous dick, and I honestly didn't even notice the colour, it was a quality cock, and that's what matters. He was firm in the way he fucked, but surprisingly gentle. He had a bodybuilders physique - say no more. I very much enjoyed the experience and would love to do it again, but I don't attribute this to the guy being black, just that HE, the individual, was exceptionally hot. It's quite jammy of me really, that my first ever gay experience with a black guy, was with one whom likely fit most people fantasy of a tall, powerful, sensual, ebony warrior with a handsome face and glowing smile
It's funny that you state that your experience had nothing to do with him being black but in the same breath say that the fact that he was black and the forbidden aspect contributed to the fun. That's very contradictory.
It is contradictory, but it was the only way I could properly describe my feelings about the experience. You may have noticed that I refer to the fact that I enjoyed it because the person I met was sexually exciting, he just happened to be a different colour to me, which I suppose, may have been the 'taboo' part, after all, it's always a little extra erotic when you have sex with another race, because it's just that little bit different, I mean, your DNAs developed in different parts of the world for thousands and thousands of years, and you were brought together through mutual desire for one another, I find something especially exciting about that.
Ok, for your information we are not another race just a different colour. To be another race, we'd have to be from another planet. I sort of understand how the visual difference can be appealing to you or anyone. After all, we are human.
I don't think you fully understand me, or perhaps I'm just not explaining very well, but I assure you I don't treat peoples ethnicity as some sort of fetish, but I will agree with you on the human part, we're still evolving, we still can't see fully past racial differences in order to simply define ourselves as Earthlings, but in the meantime, is it so bad to ACCEPT one anothers differences, and ENJOY them?
On the contrary, I understand you very well and there's nothing wrong with accepting differences and enjoying them (that's what everyone should do) provided you don't see it as taboo or whatever cos that's fetishisation. The fact that you think I see it as bad tells me you don't understand my point at all.
But we are still one race, "I think I understand your point better than you give me credit for, but regardless, we seem to be on similar pages. | |||
