FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > We made the daily mail again
We made the daily mail again
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
A user on here who was a copper posted pics in his uniform on here and now been outed by the sun
I don't work in a job where I can be in trouble for this stuff but why would somebody be so stupid! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Yep as long as the site says that your pictures cannot be used out side the site. Then they should persue those people who breach this confidence. So firstly did he relinquish the private nature of his pics and secondly make the paper disclose who provided the pic then pesue them with the law.
Expensive but pretty sure we/you will all agree to additional levies to support your privacy right??  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If you put photos on the internet they are in effect in the public domain. As an interesting aside copyright would actually only belong to the person who took the photo not the subject.
Copyright law is tortuous at best; anyone here going to risk tens of thousands of pounds in legal fees taking a copyright case to court? No I thought not - so if you don't want photos being used by others; don't post them on the internet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ooking for bbwsCouple
over a year ago
secret garden chilling, always something to do in the garden |
"This is what puts me off clubs"
This time it was through ere not at a club, but granted I came very close to getting outed as the couple on ere we're doing wrong things an said they ad a conextion! But u never quite no all the in's an out's of wot as happened just keep face pictures private then no issue |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
It's on the daily mail website, the username is listed on there but has either deleted or hidden profile according to the article, they even went as far as to give snippets of his verifications!
The issue appears to be him posing in his uniform
I was once outed by some club owners to my boss who they met socially once, it was when I was a couple, to say I was mad is an understatement, the club no longer exists and I had many happy times in there, afraid now all soured by the comments about my attendance..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago
Barbados |
"If you put photos on the internet they are in effect in the public domain. As an interesting aside copyright would actually only belong to the person who took the photo not the subject.
Copyright law is tortuous at best; anyone here going to risk tens of thousands of pounds in legal fees taking a copyright case to court? No I thought not - so if you don't want photos being used by others; don't post them on the internet."
I wouldn't bother pursuing it under copyright law. I'm not a lawyer but s33 and s34 of the criminal justice and courts act 2015 are probably best bet.
[tongue firmly in cheek]
As an aside... his comment "I did nothing illegal, just daft"... as it is an offence to impersonate a police office, he is probably the one 'police officer' on here not doing anything illegal lol.
(yeah, yeah, I know, lapel numbers needed etc... and yeah, I know of about a dozen coppers on here)
-Matt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The guy thought he'd get a shag because he was in uniform - now he's fucked. "
Yep.
I always think 'you fucking idiot' when I see pics of people in their uniform on here, police, fire service etc
Anything for a shag  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The article says the sun confronted him at his flat but it's also in the daily mail too but it's just a copy of the sun's article, stupid bloke for putting up has pic and also face pics on his profile if he is in such a high profile job but his private life shouldn't have been put all over the media |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago
Barbados |
"The article says the sun confronted him at his flat but it's also in the daily mail too but it's just a copy of the sun's article, stupid bloke for putting up has pic and also face pics on his profile if he is in such a high profile job but his private life shouldn't have been put all over the media "
Careful... that is starting to sound awfully like "She shouldn't have worn that short skirt, she was asking for it"
-Matt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Just read the article - stupid of him to put that pic up in uniform but also looks like the reporter actually targeted him as well - scary that they would go to those lengths! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The article says the sun confronted him at his flat but it's also in the daily mail too but it's just a copy of the sun's article, stupid bloke for putting up has pic and also face pics on his profile if he is in such a high profile job but his private life shouldn't have been put all over the media "
Erm...
Stupid newspaper for turning peoples perfectly legal private lifes into salacious tabloid gossip? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The guy thought he'd get a shag because he was in uniform - now he's fucked.
Yep.
I always think 'you fucking idiot' when I see pics of people in their uniform on here, police, fire service etc
Anything for a shag "
Totally agree. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Only thing he's done is show his pic with his uniform on. Bit stupid but not the worst thing in the world. His lifestyle choice is his own business. If it doesn't affect the ability to perform his job duties there shouldn't be a problem. Don't think his conduct is questionable unless he had meets on duty whilst in his uniform. I think they'd find it very difficult to sack him. But with the media involved they could panic and be rash |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"ive mailed quite a few squaddies in here, advising them that the Intelligence Corps trawl these site looking for them. All i got was abuse so i don't bother. "
To be fair, it's none of your business. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The article says the sun confronted him at his flat but it's also in the daily mail too but it's just a copy of the sun's article, stupid bloke for putting up has pic and also face pics on his profile if he is in such a high profile job but his private life shouldn't have been put all over the media
Erm...
Stupid newspaper for turning peoples perfectly legal private lifes into salacious tabloid gossip?"
Couldn't agree more, who buys this dated hate fillied tripe |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The media has a lot to answer for sometimes. They are heartless when it comes to bad press and gossip and only ever print one side of the story.
But then why put a profile picture up of yourself, especially your face. I don't understand why anyone shows their faces if they have things in their private life that could be jeapordised. It's just plain stupid. This is a sex site on the internet, nothing is totally secure but each person should minimise their own risks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Some employers do get a bit tetchy about their 'corporate image' being used as stated in this case, easily avoided by not having them public and or being a bit savvy about whom one sends pictures to..
not worth the potential grief.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
He's obviously been a tool and used his occupation as an advantage over others and it's bit him on the arse. But it's his personal life and shouldn't be an issue with his job. Probably feels more embarrassment for being stupid. Whether he's embarrassed with his friends, work colleagues and family only he will know. Most people this day and age won't even bat an eyelid |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
As a security guard I would not pose in my uniform as for the Police officer who did if I was his boss I would have a quiet word and as the paper in question they haven't got the right to print his picture |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I've read another thread on here and get the impression the uniform photo was sent privately and not on public display which meant someone he sent it to then outed him which is pretty low but that said, he really should have thought twice about it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This should be a good warning to people that there are people on the site looking for a story. You can't know who is looking at your profile or why someone chats to you. The reporter must have had enough information to find out where the man lived, if they knocked on his door.
Is there a law against harassment that could be applied? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We've never posted on here what we do for a job and to be honest it possibly would attract more people but probably more weirdos too. We don't really divulge that much when we meet. His lifestyle choice isn't the problem he's just been very foolish with the decision he made with his pics. Bet he can't stay away for long though. Bet he's back on soon but learnt his lesson. Once on fab it's hard to stay away! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"ive mailed quite a few squaddies in here, advising them that the Intelligence Corps trawl these site looking for them. All i got was abuse so i don't bother. "
my status is exactly about this. Navy lads photos with uniform and name tag clear. And messaging saying what base they are at etc...Bloody stupid
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If you put photos on the internet they are in effect in the public domain. As an interesting aside copyright would actually only belong to the person who took the photo not the subject.
Copyright law is tortuous at best; anyone here going to risk tens of thousands of pounds in legal fees taking a copyright case to court? No I thought not - so if you don't want photos being used by others; don't post them on the internet."
Finally someone else who understands the true nature of copyright law. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"We've never posted on here what we do for a job and to be honest it possibly would attract more people but probably more weirdos too. We don't really divulge that much when we meet. His lifestyle choice isn't the problem he's just been very foolish with the decision he made with his pics. Bet he can't stay away for long though. Bet he's back on soon but learnt his lesson. Once on fab it's hard to stay away!"
I'm now interested in your jobs! I reckon your "civil servants" real life mr and Mrs smith!
The guy has been an idiot and makes you wonder if hacks are not setting people up on here and trawling for the latest story to fill the paper with |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Is there a law against harassment that could be applied? "
Yes, almost certainly.
But the media will worm their way out of it with the line 'public interest' and just print a tiny apology. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
What stupidity putting up pictures in uniform it goes to show how gormless some of the people who are meant to be ensuring others obey the law. I have little sympathy for people doing something so idiotic as they only have themselves to blame. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"A user on here who was a copper posted pics in his uniform on here and now been outed by the sun
I don't work in a job where I can be in trouble for this stuff but why would somebody be so stupid!"
Oh dear, I hope they don't think all cop gear is real .... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A user on here who was a copper posted pics in his uniform on here and now been outed by the sun
I don't work in a job where I can be in trouble for this stuff but why would somebody be so stupid!"
Was that recently? As I think he may have contacted me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
wow there are some harsh comments on here.
The guy made a mistake, yes he tried to tempt the ladies who enjoy uniforms and it backfired.
He has my sympathy, we all send face pics when we decide its right, many have face pics on their profile, and many have pics with their work 'uniform' on, be it a suit or work clothes with logo on, wearing their company badge, picture taken in the office with identifiable logos on the paperwork behind them or on the desk, etc.
Newspapers search for stories, for those who deny him sympathy, would you be as happy if it happened to you.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"ive mailed quite a few squaddies in here, advising them that the Intelligence Corps trawl these site looking for them. All i got was abuse so i don't bother.
To be fair, it's none of your business."
bit harsh for someone who's on here being a victim at every opportunity they see ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eerobCouple
over a year ago
solihull |
"wow there are some harsh comments on here.
The guy made a mistake, yes he tried to tempt the ladies who enjoy uniforms and it backfired.
He has my sympathy, we all send face pics when we decide its right, many have face pics on their profile, and many have pics with their work 'uniform' on, be it a suit or work clothes with logo on, wearing their company badge, picture taken in the office with identifiable logos on the paperwork behind them or on the desk, etc.
Newspapers search for stories, for those who deny him sympathy, would you be as happy if it happened to you.
"
I wouldn't be happy if it happened to me, but then I wouldnt be dumb enough to put myself in such a position. He deserves everything he gets, Im glad hes never been involved in any matter that required police intervention that ive been involved with. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"wow there are some harsh comments on here.
The guy made a mistake, yes he tried to tempt the ladies who enjoy uniforms and it backfired.
He has my sympathy, we all send face pics when we decide its right, many have face pics on their profile, and many have pics with their work 'uniform' on, be it a suit or work clothes with logo on, wearing their company badge, picture taken in the office with identifiable logos on the paperwork behind them or on the desk, etc.
Newspapers search for stories, for those who deny him sympathy, would you be as happy if it happened to you.
I wouldn't be happy if it happened to me, but then I wouldnt be dumb enough to put myself in such a position. He deserves everything he gets, Im glad hes never been involved in any matter that required police intervention that ive been involved with. "
From what Ive read, he sent the picture privately, it wasnt on his profile.
He may of told the other person he was in the force and could of been asked for a pic on the promise of a meet.
We all do daft things sometimes.
I sincerely hope you never need to ask for police intervention. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eerobCouple
over a year ago
solihull |
"wow there are some harsh comments on here.
The guy made a mistake, yes he tried to tempt the ladies who enjoy uniforms and it backfired.
He has my sympathy, we all send face pics when we decide its right, many have face pics on their profile, and many have pics with their work 'uniform' on, be it a suit or work clothes with logo on, wearing their company badge, picture taken in the office with identifiable logos on the paperwork behind them or on the desk, etc.
Newspapers search for stories, for those who deny him sympathy, would you be as happy if it happened to you.
I wouldn't be happy if it happened to me, but then I wouldnt be dumb enough to put myself in such a position. He deserves everything he gets, Im glad hes never been involved in any matter that required police intervention that ive been involved with.
From what Ive read, he sent the picture privately, it wasnt on his profile.
He may of told the other person he was in the force and could of been asked for a pic on the promise of a meet.
We all do daft things sometimes.
I sincerely hope you never need to ask for police intervention. "
I hope I never need it, but I know I wouldn't want intervention from someone like him.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"wow there are some harsh comments on here.
The guy made a mistake, yes he tried to tempt the ladies who enjoy uniforms and it backfired.
He has my sympathy, we all send face pics when we decide its right, many have face pics on their profile, and many have pics with their work 'uniform' on, be it a suit or work clothes with logo on, wearing their company badge, picture taken in the office with identifiable logos on the paperwork behind them or on the desk, etc.
Newspapers search for stories, for those who deny him sympathy, would you be as happy if it happened to you.
I wouldn't be happy if it happened to me, but then I wouldnt be dumb enough to put myself in such a position. He deserves everything he gets, Im glad hes never been involved in any matter that required police intervention that ive been involved with.
From what Ive read, he sent the picture privately, it wasnt on his profile.
He may of told the other person he was in the force and could of been asked for a pic on the promise of a meet.
We all do daft things sometimes.
I sincerely hope you never need to ask for police intervention.
I hope I never need it, but I know I wouldn't want intervention from someone like him...."
Is that because he is a swinger? or because he sent his pic in uniform to someone.
I genuinely dont understand what has made him so bad |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This is exactly why I never send out face pics to anyone who asks or post them on my profile. This is also the reason I will only meet Verified guys only. After what happened at swingfields think about it!! Newspaper are constantly seeking stories and 10 years ago it was vice girls in flats which they seemed to do to death. Now they are turning their attention to swinging. And let's be honest here, it is easy for an undercover reporter to put a profile on here and trawl through the site seeking to meet someone the think may have a rather interesting profile... If they have a high profile job then even better! It never fails to amaze me how folk can let their guard down on fab and yes I would prefer to err on the side of caution - if I get less meets then I can easily live with that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It's disgusting that just because of your job that someone can publish a person's personal life over the media. Yes he was daft to put pictures of himself in uniform up but come on, everyone has the right to live a private life. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think the issue is that when you join you have to agree to certain rules. Posting or sharing pics in uniform likely go against rules on bringing discredit on the service and potentially opening yourself up to blackmail, although guess that depends on how open he was with family and so on about it.
Not quite sure how that dovetails with human rights legislation but it's what you sign up to. I have a degree of sympathy, especially if it was sent in a message but it was pretty daft. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Although it's a shame that the tabloid has invaded this persons privacy, I still have little sympathy.
I've been in the emergency services game and I can ensure you that flashing your warrant card in clubs and posing in uniform in dating sites would have been drummed into you as a no no. This would have further been drummed into the officer whilst on active duty so if now loses his job then he should blame himself and hopefully not the daily mail. These rigid policies are there for a reason including reducing the risk of blackmailing you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Although it's a shame that the tabloid has invaded this persons privacy, I still have little sympathy.
I've been in the emergency services game and I can ensure you that flashing your warrant card in clubs and posing in uniform in dating sites would have been drummed into you as a no no. This would have further been drummed into the officer whilst on active duty so if now loses his job then he should blame himself and hopefully not the daily mail. These rigid policies are there for a reason including reducing the risk of blackmailing you "
Actualy it was originaly in the Sun newspaper, but youre right in what you say and you cant blame the Sun. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Actualy it was originaly in the Sun newspaper, but youre right in what you say and you cant blame the Sun."
No, you really can blame the Sun for this kind of invasive and life-ruining journalism. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Actualy it was originaly in the Sun newspaper, but youre right in what you say and you cant blame the Sun.
No, you really can blame the Sun for this kind of invasive and life-ruining journalism. "
I was just pointing out to the other poster who said you cant blame The Mail, That it was The Sun. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"But the paper should have no right to put pics/ out people on here with out there consent "
The paper used the pics that police officer sent the lady who blew his indenty on here. Therefore "his" pics no longer belonged to him.
Also this is a public site so I'm told. As such everyone's pics are open to anyone to "steal". Which is why I'm stunned when people put their face pic as public. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Actualy it was originaly in the Sun newspaper, but youre right in what you say and you cant blame the Sun.
No, you really can blame the Sun for this kind of invasive and life-ruining journalism. "
It's their reason for existence though - they'd have no justification to publish every day if they did sensible journalism as no-one would buy it
Maybe one day the public will stop wanting that sort of stuff and if you look at sales over time they are decreasing |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Anyone thinking their personal life is just personal and shouldn't be exposed in this day and age of freedom of speech and media doing what they're paid to do by the readers and their employers is just plain naive. There is really no such thing as respect of privacy in this day and age.
If you respect your privacy it's up to you to protect it no one else is concerned for your privacy. Sounds a bit harsh but it's the reality we all live in now.
We all want to know other people's business... the most popular TV shows and tabloids and media reflects that.
Hide it if you value it...If you don't then accept it'll be of interest to many out there for numerous reasons...good or bad. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The fact this place/swingers in general are in the media a lot leads me to believe its somebody from the inside.
A fab user. There ARE journalists using the site. Often they masquerade as normal users, may even appear to be normal users, maybe have fake verifications set up from multiple accounts they have access to as they set these free accounts up.
They may have even met genuine users to gain "credibility". Often the best place to hide is "in plain site".
They can then say "I've got nothing to hide" etc.
That what everyone who is duplicitous says.
They feel it gains trust.
This site is great but there ARE journalists here, just aire on the side of caution as you don't want egg on your face if you end up being a bloody story.
A woman was recently named and had her address appear in the paper from
Fab.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Anyone thinking their personal life is just personal and shouldn't be exposed in this day and age of freedom of speech and media doing what they're paid to do by the readers and their employers is just plain naive. There is really no such thing as respect of privacy in this day and age.
If you respect your privacy it's up to you to protect it no one else is concerned for your privacy. Sounds a bit harsh but it's the reality we all live in now.
We all want to know other people's business... the most popular TV shows and tabloids and media reflects that.
Hide it if you value it...If you don't then accept it'll be of interest to many out there for numerous reasons...good or bad."
Its all true, we all want to know other peoples buisness. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The fact this place/swingers in general are in the media a lot leads me to believe its somebody from the inside.
A fab user. There ARE journalists using the site. Often they masquerade as normal users, may even appear to be normal users, maybe have fake verifications set up from multiple accounts they have access to as they set these free accounts up.
They may have even met genuine users to gain "credibility". Often the best place to hide is "in plain site".
They can then say "I've got nothing to hide" etc.
That what everyone who is duplicitous says.
They feel it gains trust.
This site is great but there ARE journalists here, just aire on the side of caution as you don't want egg on your face if you end up being a bloody story.
A woman was recently named and had her address appear in the paper from
Fab.
"
Totally agree. Papers are looking for a juicy story and if you have a high profile job you definitely may be asking for trouble! The interest won't go away...swinging stories will sell papers. Yes there are undercover reporters no doubt posing as members so best to always be ultra cautious in who you meet. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The photos of him in the sun have the fabswingers stamp and webaddress on the bottom and his user name is given out. Risky job or not giving out his user name is not on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Blaming the media is a bit like going out in the rain without one's coat and blaming the weather you got soaked..
"
"Blaming the media is a bit like going out and getting d*unk and then blaming the drink when you got raped..."
You see, that's victim blaming.
This is the media's fault. 100%. It's not his fault for completely legally going about his business. It's the shitty newspapers fault for thinking that this is news.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Also this is a public site so I'm told. As such everyone's pics are open to anyone to "steal". Which is why I'm stunned when people put their face pic as public. "
Some of us don't have any problem with being "outed" because we're already out. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Blaming the media is a bit like going out in the rain without one's coat and blaming the weather you got soaked..
"Blaming the media is a bit like going out and getting d*unk and then blaming the drink when you got raped..."
You see, that's victim blaming.
This is the media's fault. 100%. It's not his fault for completely legally going about his business. It's the shitty newspapers fault for thinking that this is news.
"
totally a leap into something out of context with your analogy..
the media sell shit because people buy it and people like to read about other's salacious shenanigans..
security for police is also an issue, as well as members of the armed forces in the current climate..
compromising oneself and one's possible family is not sensible..
if you can't or are not willing to look at the facts that some occupations need to be a bit savvy then fine..
his business in privacy is not the issue for his employer, its his using his uniform that's got him into the papers'..
agree its not news.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Blaming the media is a bit like going out in the rain without one's coat and blaming the weather you got soaked..
"Blaming the media is a bit like going out and getting d*unk and then blaming the drink when you got raped..."
You see, that's victim blaming.
This is the media's fault. 100%. It's not his fault for completely legally going about his business. It's the shitty newspapers fault for thinking that this is news.
"
I disagree. In police training school, this officer would have had it drummed into him not to identify himself as a police officer on the internet as well as in person unless it is to place himself on duty. After passing out, the police professionals standards department would have held talks about this at least every year.
If this officer sent photographs of himself (*in uniform) then he knew the risk that he may be sacked for bringing the job into disrepute. If is was not in uniform then it would likely not be a problem.
I'm an employer with a medium size work force and if any of my employees were on fab posing in a photograph wearing their name badges then I'd sack them immediately (and then block them on here!). If my employees are on here but do not identify my company then I'll block and move on as they have a right to be here. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Never fails to amaze us how many people think The Sun, Daily Mail etc. are news papers  . The papers news papers in this country are no more than comics. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
