I will admit - I do have a type (took me a while to realize and admit to)
They tend to be slim (like me), around the same height (at a guess 5,10 - never actually measured), small (but not non-existent) breast and bum.
but here's the kicker - from my experience - they look great in porn - but are so smothered by knowing they look good - they end up being totally unapproachable or utterly lazy in bed.
Whereas the more rounded ladies or the ones with larger breasts and bums – I would never really watch in porn – but feel more comfortable to talk to and have had a DAMN site more fun with in bed.
And I will admit – a part of me feels guilty about this.
I prefer one type to watch – and another to actually be with.
I'm not the only one right?
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
OP, you're contradicting yourself somewhat I feel. Can "your type" really actually be your type, if you've enjoyed the opposite much more in practice? I tend to watch slimmer ladies in porn, because, well, it's easier to see what's going on!!  but absolutely my "type" is for the curvier, larger lady...I prefer the look and the feel of what I see as soft feminine flesh. And does it really matter? You must have an attraction to those you play with surely? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"OP, you're contradicting yourself somewhat I feel. Can "your type" really actually be your type, if you've enjoyed the opposite much more in practice? I tend to watch slimmer ladies in porn, because, well, it's easier to see what's going on!! but absolutely my "type" is for the curvier, larger lady...I prefer the look and the feel of what I see as soft feminine flesh. And does it really matter? You must have an attraction to those you play with surely?"
Thank-you
"it's easier to see what's going on!!"
there is that - probably why the karma-sutra was invented.
and yes - I only ever go with women who sexually excite me.
I think I've just been a porn hermit for too long and have lost track of reality vs media "reality"
give me time - I will learn - (why do you think I'm here?)
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I prefer the look and the feel of what I see as soft feminine flesh."
Which makes me wonder - what do women see as feminine?
Is someone who could kick your arse in the Ironman Triathlon still seen as feminine?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I prefer the look and the feel of what I see as soft feminine flesh.
Which makes me wonder - what do women see as feminine?
Is someone who could kick your arse in the Ironman Triathlon still seen as feminine?
"
Everyone's idea of femininity and masculinity will be completely different, and for me it's not just about looks |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
OP I'm just the same. I find really hot, ripped, muscular guys aesthetically pleasing but i don't particularly find them sexually attractive. I'm more drawn to an average looking man, maybe even a bit on the larger side.
Think of it like artwork. You can appreciate it all but you wouldn't want to hang it on the wall.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
OP you have a good point. The women who I like in bed are mostly the women who I like in porn. It's because when watching porn I'm thinking about playing with them.
If there was a question about playing with versus walking down the street with ..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
