FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > How to quantify heavy cummers?
How to quantify heavy cummers?
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *oxesMan
over a year ago
Southend, Essex |
"I think we need some proper science behind this. Who's volunteering to have a wank into measuring cups?"
Sounds like a plan there has to be a scientists somewhere who has done research on this, I know Dr Kinsley 1st sex related study was on weather men who ejaculate further were more fertile.
"They are not nessearaly apparently". |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxesMan
over a year ago
Southend, Essex |
"I'm talking about a fab survey.
We get volunteers to cum in measuring cups and post pics of the results and we have a league table. Lol.
"
well just looked on scholor and 2.3ml (Nelson & bulge et al1 1974)to 3.2(Macloed & wang, 1979) seems to be normal. so anything higher must be a heavier load |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxesMan
over a year ago
Southend, Essex |
"or just watch a compilation and gauge it from that.
That doesn't tell us what the fab average is though.
Where's the fun in just googling stuff when we could be doing proper research?
"
if this was proper reserch we need erhical clearence first. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"or just watch a compilation and gauge it from that.
That doesn't tell us what the fab average is though.
Where's the fun in just googling stuff when we could be doing proper research?
if this was proper reserch we need erhical clearence first. "
That's just if you give a stuff about the participants. Lol
We just need the data goddamit and by any means possible. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxesMan
over a year ago
Southend, Essex |
"or just watch a compilation and gauge it from that.
That doesn't tell us what the fab average is though.
Where's the fun in just googling stuff when we could be doing proper research?
if this was proper reserch we need erhical clearence first.
That's just if you give a stuff about the participants. Lol
We just need the data goddamit and by any means possible."
haha lol better get my messuribg cylinder out then lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm talking about a fab survey.
We get volunteers to cum in measuring cups and post pics of the results and we have a league table. Lol.
"
That doesn't sound very fab though. I suggest we nominate someone, who travels the country, taking a load in each city, then we vote on the resulting pictures..... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm talking about a fab survey.
We get volunteers to cum in measuring cups and post pics of the results and we have a league table. Lol.
That doesn't sound very fab though. I suggest we nominate someone, who travels the country, taking a load in each city, then we vote on the resulting pictures....."
Good idea. We need a male and female (And I guess a TS and TV) to perform the act to prevent any slight of hand from the cumee so to speak. And a 4 door car with boot space for samples and some free time on their hands. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I am told i cum very large load.. Handy cos i love cumming over a woman. Any ideas how much is needed to be supplied to be a heavy cummer?"
heavy cummer = when there's more than I can swallow!!!! x x x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think we need some proper science behind this. Who's volunteering to have a wank into measuring cups?
Sounds like a plan there has to be a scientists somewhere who has done research on this, I know Dr Kinsley 1st sex related study was on weather men who ejaculate further were more fertile.
"They are not nessearaly apparently". "
I'm not sure that using weathermen would provide representative results...  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"If i swallow once that is standard. If i swallow twice or 3 times before you finish - good load. 4 or more is heavy and I will be very happy!  "
heading for the train station now lol. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I've absalutely no idea. One of the many surprises when I joined the swing scene, was that not only cum production was measurable, but that being a so called 'heavy cummer' was considered something to be proud of. Whereas I get the attraction of a big cock, six pack, nice bum, sexual technique etc, I never quite understood why cum quantity was important. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's one of those things that I think you can tell just by looking, coupled with your first, instinctive thought. Seeing some pictures on fab my initial instinctive thought was "Jeez, wtf!. How many guys was that??" When it turns out it was one person - that is my qualification for a heavy cummer. Not one of my gifts though, it has to be said.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxesMan
over a year ago
Southend, Essex |
"I think we need some proper science behind this. Who's volunteering to have a wank into measuring cups?
Sounds like a plan there has to be a scientists somewhere who has done research on this, I know Dr Kinsley 1st sex related study was on weather men who ejaculate further were more fertile.
"They are not nessearaly apparently".
I'm not sure that using weathermen would provide representative results... "
Damn I knew punctuation needed to go somewhere lol. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"or just watch a compilation and gauge it from that.
That doesn't tell us what the fab average is though.
Where's the fun in just googling stuff when we could be doing proper research?
Average can not be assesed . If I don't cum for 24 hours it will be big load. I orgasm 3 times a day so naturally if I held back I would fill the cup lol
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's one of those things that I think you can tell just by looking, coupled with your first, instinctive thought. Seeing some pictures on fab my initial instinctive thought was "Jeez, wtf!. How many guys was that??" When it turns out it was one person - that is my qualification for a heavy cummer. Not one of my gifts though, it has to be said. "
LOL I wouldn't have said I was a particularly heavy cummer but we had exactly this on one of our pics - several messages asking how many guys and on that occasion was just me, albeit with a few days stored up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If i swallow once that is standard. If i swallow twice or 3 times before you finish - good load. 4 or more is heavy and I will be very happy! "
I'm taking this as the official measurement as it puts me in the heavy bracket
Admittedly it maybe just be because she has a small mouth hahaha |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Never thought I cum much until I started meeting guys and girls on here the more turned on I am the more I cum,I cum on a girls tits once totally covered them and the bed once I had finished she said wow I've never seen so much cum. Have met some guys and most don't fill my mouth but others am gagging trying to take it,and it got the better of me one day an d had a wank into a measuring vessel and managed about 5ml with it being a quick wank |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm talking about a fab survey.
We get volunteers to cum in measuring cups and post pics of the results and we have a league table. Lol.
well just looked on scholor and 2.3ml (Nelson & bulge et al1 1974)to 3.2(Macloed & wang, 1979) seems to be normal. so anything higher must be a heavier load "
That doesn't seem right, it's only half a teaspoon!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I am told i cum very large load.. Handy cos i love cumming over a woman. Any ideas how much is needed to be supplied to be a heavy cummer?"
However much it is its never enough! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxesMan
over a year ago
Southend, Essex |
"I'm talking about a fab survey.
We get volunteers to cum in measuring cups and post pics of the results and we have a league table. Lol.
well just looked on scholor and 2.3ml (Nelson & bulge et al1 1974)to 3.2(Macloed & wang, 1979) seems to be normal. so anything higher must be a heavier load
That doesn't seem right, it's only half a teaspoon! "
I don't write the evidence.
Rember most mens cum is viscous and reflects light well so when it spreads it gives the impression of more esp if it is dialouted with water if he is fireing loads little shots out(strictly antidotal of course)
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"It's one of those things that I think you can tell just by looking, coupled with your first, instinctive thought. Seeing some pictures on fab my initial instinctive thought was "Jeez, wtf!. How many guys was that??" When it turns out it was one person - that is my qualification for a heavy cummer. Not one of my gifts though, it has to be said. LOL I wouldn't have said I was a particularly heavy cummer but we had exactly this on one of our pics - several messages asking how many guys and on that occasion was just me, albeit with a few days stored up "
Pity I can't see the evidence, but I would imagine that given those comments it would qualify for the OP! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It's one of those things that I think you can tell just by looking, coupled with your first, instinctive thought. Seeing some pictures on fab my initial instinctive thought was "Jeez, wtf!. How many guys was that??" When it turns out it was one person - that is my qualification for a heavy cummer. Not one of my gifts though, it has to be said. LOL I wouldn't have said I was a particularly heavy cummer but we had exactly this on one of our pics - several messages asking how many guys and on that occasion was just me, albeit with a few days stored up
Pity I can't see the evidence, but I would imagine that given those comments it would qualify for the OP! "
PM'd you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If i swallow once that is standard. If i swallow twice or 3 times before you finish - good load. 4 or more is heavy and I will be very happy!
I'm taking this as the official measurement as it puts me in the heavy bracket
Admittedly it maybe just be because she has a small mouth hahaha"
Erm no. My mouth has taken some good loads.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
