 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Naming and shaming will always be open to abuse and open the floodgates for angry folk who felt slighted because they didn't get a reply or who were rejected after a social meet - whats to stop them making up stuff about folk?
So I can see why this cannot happen |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"they should report to admin privately and block them, privacy laws prevent you from open discussion any further"
It won't be covered by privacy laws
We had our pics stolen and I reported them.nothing was done .it was obvious ours was the real profile.
so I named the fake profile. Before anything had been done about the stolen pics we were threatened with a ban!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time."
A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time.
A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that?"
Not fab being a waste of time - having discussions about timewasters . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time.
A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that?
Not fab being a waste of time - having discussions about timewasters ."
We all know time wasters will always exist so no point encouraging them by discussing them, so yeah a waste of time. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Admin dont want open discussions of timewasters partly because "facts" may be misrepresented or inaccurate but also it may bring the website into disrepute and people may decide that its all a complete waste of time.
A waste of time? Fab? Why would anyone think that?
Not fab being a waste of time - having discussions about timewasters .
We all know time wasters will always exist so no point encouraging them by discussing them, so yeah a waste of time."
Yep , agree with that  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
