 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Hi to you all 
I'm pretty new to the forums and posted a question in another one. I'm thinking perhaps I should have posted it here as I'm after genuine swinger opinions.
My question is....
SM is a like you can check as an interest on here...yet BDSM pics are often banned.
Is there a genuine reason for this from the point of view of site users? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I think it has something to do with UK law on pornography etc. Rather than anything else, might be wrong though."
That's the reply I got from an Admin but it left me confused. After the recent (ish) changes in the UK Pornography Laws a great deal of none BDSM pics on here are technically illegal such as any containing face sitting yet they are fine :/
Thank you for the reply though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"most likely the law some things not permitted under uk law such as face sitting I kid you not "
Lol we both quoted face sitting as an example at the same time |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"most likely the law some things not permitted under uk law such as face sitting I kid you not
Lol we both quoted face sitting as an example at the same time "
yes its strange but that one is an ass of a law lol
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"most likely the law some things not permitted under uk law such as face sitting I kid you not
Lol we both quoted face sitting as an example at the same time
yes its strange but that one is an ass of a law lol
"
Thing is I've seen plenty of pics involving restraints on here.
Plenty involving people in "schoolgirl" outfits.
Both of them equally illegal yet permitted :/ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"most likely the law some things not permitted under uk law such as face sitting I kid you not
Lol we both quoted face sitting as an example at the same time
yes its strange but that one is an ass of a law lol
Thing is I've seen plenty of pics involving restraints on here.
Plenty involving people in "schoolgirl" outfits.
Both of them equally illegal yet permitted :/"
Pictures of people in restraints, and pictures of women in schoolgirl outfits are not illegal. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"most likely the law some things not permitted under uk law such as face sitting I kid you not
Lol we both quoted face sitting as an example at the same time
yes its strange but that one is an ass of a law lol
Thing is I've seen plenty of pics involving restraints on here.
Plenty involving people in "schoolgirl" outfits.
Both of them equally illegal yet permitted :/
Pictures of people in restraints, and pictures of women in schoolgirl outfits are not illegal."
Ummm. They are. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"most likely the law some things not permitted under uk law such as face sitting I kid you not
Lol we both quoted face sitting as an example at the same time
yes its strange but that one is an ass of a law lol
Thing is I've seen plenty of pics involving restraints on here.
Plenty involving people in "schoolgirl" outfits.
Both of them equally illegal yet permitted :/
Pictures of people in restraints, and pictures of women in schoolgirl outfits are not illegal.
Ummm. They are."
You are incorrect.
Please feel free to state the law, or case law. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"most likely the law some things not permitted under uk law such as face sitting I kid you not
Lol we both quoted face sitting as an example at the same time
yes its strange but that one is an ass of a law lol
Thing is I've seen plenty of pics involving restraints on here.
Plenty involving people in "schoolgirl" outfits.
Both of them equally illegal yet permitted :/
Pictures of people in restraints, and pictures of women in schoolgirl outfits are not illegal.
Ummm. They are.
You are incorrect.
Please feel free to state the law, or case law."
Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We've had pix passed by some mods .. then a few weeks later rejected as "too rude" .. .. .. some mods have there own agenda ??? .. ... we had a squirting pic rejected ... but we've seen on other profile actual piss play .. and those gets past the mods/administration .. ... .. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"We've had pix passed by some mods .. then a few weeks later rejected as "too rude" .. .. .. some mods have there own agenda ??? .. ... we had a squirting pic rejected ... but we've seen on other profile actual piss play .. and those gets past the mods/administration .. ... .. "
I wondered the same myself. Which would be a shame as rules should be universal and not based on personal preferences. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014"
"applies regulations to R18-rated pornography that is available through video on demand or other streaming platforms"
That's not photos?.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014
"applies regulations to R18-rated pornography that is available through video on demand or other streaming platforms"
That's not photos?.."
Yes but it's an amendment to an earlier act. And maybe you're right...maybe it doesn't cover photos...I'm not pretending to be an expert...but if it doesn't cover photos then we're back to the original point....
Why are SM photos barred when you can tick it as an interest? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014
"applies regulations to R18-rated pornography that is available through video on demand or other streaming platforms"
That's not photos?..
Yes but it's an amendment to an earlier act. And maybe you're right...maybe it doesn't cover photos...I'm not pretending to be an expert...but if it doesn't cover photos then we're back to the original point....
Why are SM photos barred when you can tick it as an interest?"
Because you can do it but the site doesnt really have the funds to hire a legal team to defend any cases
Also it would be fairly stupid to publish the kind of pictures that get banned (heavy harm) because that would be enough evidence to earn yourself an actual bodily harm conviction |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"We've had pix passed by some mods .. then a few weeks later rejected as "too rude" .. .. .. some mods have there own agenda ??? .. ... we had a squirting pic rejected ... but we've seen on other profile actual piss play .. and those gets past the mods/administration .. ... .. "
Hmmm, that's a shame. Can't knock a good squirty pic. Would have enjoyed seeing that one. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"We've had pix passed by some mods .. then a few weeks later rejected as "too rude" .. .. .. some mods have there own agenda ??? .. ... we had a squirting pic rejected ... but we've seen on other profile actual piss play .. and those gets past the mods/administration .. ... .. "
More likley the first picture mod was fairly relaxed but somone has since reported your pictures (someone youve rejected maybe) and the mods have to review them and remove them if they break the rules.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014
"applies regulations to R18-rated pornography that is available through video on demand or other streaming platforms"
That's not photos?..
Yes but it's an amendment to an earlier act. And maybe you're right...maybe it doesn't cover photos...I'm not pretending to be an expert...but if it doesn't cover photos then we're back to the original point....
Why are SM photos barred when you can tick it as an interest?"
Because Admin don't want those pictures on their site.
Simple really.
I would imagine it is basically a thin wedge argument - you have to draw the line somewhere. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago
Somewhere in North Norfolk |
"Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2014
"applies regulations to R18-rated pornography that is available through video on demand or other streaming platforms"
That's not photos?..
Yes but it's an amendment to an earlier act. And maybe you're right...maybe it doesn't cover photos...I'm not pretending to be an expert...but if it doesn't cover photos then we're back to the original point....
Why are SM photos barred when you can tick it as an interest?"
Like admin told you, it's based on their interpretation of the law and what they can safely allow on here without serious risk of being dragged off to court to provide evidence or of being prosecuted themselves.
It's the same reason it's not permitted to discuss serious illegal activity on the fora. Admin doesn't want to be summonsed to court to provide evidence. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago
Somewhere in North Norfolk |
Oh and some of their rules are based on things they just don't like, which is fair enough. This isn't a fetish site.
They think it's inappropriate to show pets in photographs, for example. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago
Somewhere in North Norfolk |
The picture rules are here:
https://m.fabswingers.com/articles/photo-rules
"Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here."
So, if by admin's judgement it's outside the norms, rude, taboo or unpleasant, it's not allowed.
They allow people to list it as an interest, they just don't want to see it. And it's their site, their rules. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I had a cbt on one of my pics forever. I only removed it as I wanted to replace with a more up dated one. "
We have bondage and CBT on our couples profile - just hidden away in the shadows. You can see it if you know what you're looking for. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You can look other places anyway, if that's your type of photo. There are sites for different specialisms.
I like photos with a hint of what's happened anyway - so you can fill in the lines in between, yourself. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Basically it's their ball and if they don't want you to play with it you have to like it or find someone else's to play with.
I dare say they will be over careful what to allow on the site for fear of any repercussions |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The picture rules are here:
https://m.fabswingers.com/articles/photo-rules
"Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here."
So, if by admin's judgement it's outside the norms, rude, taboo or unpleasant, it's not allowed.
They allow people to list it as an interest, they just don't want to see it. And it's their site, their rules."
Laugh.... Big groups of people fucking each other is "the norm"?????
I guess it is in this crazy world.
V xxx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago
Somewhere in North Norfolk |
Admin have something against watersports photos. They're not illegal, they just don't like them so they're not allowed.
Seems fair enough to me.
If you want to post whatever photos you like, create your own site  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ee VianteWoman
over a year ago
Somewhere in North Norfolk |
"The picture rules are here:
https://m.fabswingers.com/articles/photo-rules
"Nothing nasty. The photo can't show anyone who might be being hurt, or who has been hurt. It also can't show anything that is outside the norms. If it's too rude, taboo or unpleasant, or if it puts us off our dinner, it is not welcome here."
So, if by admin's judgement it's outside the norms, rude, taboo or unpleasant, it's not allowed.
They allow people to list it as an interest, they just don't want to see it. And it's their site, their rules.
Laugh.... Big groups of people fucking each other is "the norm"?????
I guess it is in this crazy world.
V xxx "
It's "the norm" as far as admin is concerned and that's what counts.
I'd say it pretty much the norm for swingers. This isn't fabBDSM, fabCBT or fabwatersports after all. The rules would probably be different if it were. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
