FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Excuses
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Maybe they just dont want to talk, I never hand my number out, if anybody asks me to chat on the phone I just say no, if that means people think I'm a man so be it I didn't want to talk to them anyway " Same here | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Maybe they just dont want to talk, I never hand my number out, if anybody asks me to chat on the phone I just say no, if that means people think I'm a man so be it I didn't want to talk to them anyway " I feel the same, I'd rather just get a feel for someone with messages then if its going to move forward meet | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Maybe they just dont want to talk, I never hand my number out, if anybody asks me to chat on the phone I just say no, if that means people think I'm a man so be it I didn't want to talk to them anyway " Same Maybe you're just not their type | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " Nope we think your right to make that assumption..not only with females....lots og guys on couples profiles...and its so obvious | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Nope we think your right to make that assumption..not only with females....lots og guys on couples profiles...and its so obvious " So anyone who won't give you their number is a fake? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Nope we think your right to make that assumption..not only with females....lots og guys on couples profiles...and its so obvious So anyone who won't give you their number is a fake? " I've been told I'm a man so many times now I think I might be starting to grow a tiny penis | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Nope we think your right to make that assumption..not only with females....lots og guys on couples profiles...and its so obvious So anyone who won't give you their number is a fake? " Nope i didnt say that...i said shes right about guys on females profiles | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Nope we think your right to make that assumption..not only with females....lots og guys on couples profiles...and its so obvious So anyone who won't give you their number is a fake? Nope i didnt say that...i said shes right about guys on females profiles " Ah ok, yep I agree that there are, sorry read your comment wrong | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers" A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men" Oohh! Sorry OP. I thought you meant you sent out first messages with your phone number. I don't think your post was very clear. Apologies. -Courtney | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men" There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If somebody sent me a phone number with a first message I wouldn't even reply Why on earth would I want to talk on the phone with somebody I'd never even exchanged a message with I think your lucky you got a reply " What part of my posting suggested I sent my phone No with an initial message? Jesus, your so quick to bash a post you don't even take time to read properly - Okay so some of you are happy to message meet and fuck, well perhaps you can appreciate there are some of us who like to confirm one or two things first, namely by speaking. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I would say the majority of women would just chat lol." I'd say she needs to be patient! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers." What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men Oohh! Sorry OP. I thought you meant you sent out first messages with your phone number. I don't think your post was very clear. Apologies. -Courtney " To be fair, she did say four bi fems in four days so I'd assume first message too. Kudos to her if she can manage four sets of lengthy messages over four days. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number " We did forget to say...woman to woman..i Missy would never just talk to the male half of the couple on the phone | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If somebody sent me a phone number with a first message I wouldn't even reply Why on earth would I want to talk on the phone with somebody I'd never even exchanged a message with I think your lucky you got a reply What part of my posting suggested I sent my phone No with an initial message? Jesus, your so quick to bash a post you don't even take time to read properly - Okay so some of you are happy to message meet and fuck, well perhaps you can appreciate there are some of us who like to confirm one or two things first, namely by speaking. " By saying I messaged 4 separate bi female offering my number for a chat it made it sound like you had just messaged them offering your number for a chat Had you said I offered my number to 4 women I had been talking to for a chat it would have been read differently I wasn't bashing I was just answering your question maybe I read it wrong but by reading the thread I wasn't the only one who took your wording to mean that | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number " It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club." Then you need to tweek your can accom on your profile...we do meet at ours and other peoples homes..we dont meet in clubs..we also dont cam in the cam rooms..we do on skype...but if the female half of the other couple is not willing to chat on the phone with Missy..then its a no goer lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey OP I'm bi too and also experience a lot of fake couples/female profiles where there is no ovaries present. I usually ask to Skype first. It's anonymous as you use a username not your mob number and sorts out the fakes! " Good point, and perhaps that's the way to go. That said, a quick chat has bought results in the past, unfortunately not so this week. The only other mistake this week was sharing on here. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club. Then you need to tweek your can accom on your profile...we do meet at ours and other peoples homes..we dont meet in clubs..we also dont cam in the cam rooms..we do on skype...but if the female half of the other couple is not willing to chat on the phone with Missy..then its a no goer lol " That's fair enough you manage your way of meeting how you see fit, lots like to chat on the phone but a lot don't, I never give my number out or chat on the phone, if I was told the meet was off if we didn't phone chat I'd start looking else where for a meet no matter now well be got on upto that point I hate talking on the phone to people I know never mind people I have never met | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " No I'm genuine but I rarely talk to anyone on the phone from fab! Id rather meet for coffee tbh | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club. Then you need to tweek your can accom on your profile...we do meet at ours and other peoples homes..we dont meet in clubs..we also dont cam in the cam rooms..we do on skype...but if the female half of the other couple is not willing to chat on the phone with Missy..then its a no goer lol " Well as I said we each work in different ways, saying I haven't accommodated, doesn't mean I won't accommodate... so actually I'm happy with the way my profile is but thanks for the critique. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club. Then you need to tweek your can accom on your profile...we do meet at ours and other peoples homes..we dont meet in clubs..we also dont cam in the cam rooms..we do on skype...but if the female half of the other couple is not willing to chat on the phone with Missy..then its a no goer lol Well as I said we each work in different ways, saying I haven't accommodated, doesn't mean I won't accommodate... so actually I'm happy with the way my profile is but thanks for the critique. " I wasn't criticizing you at all...just feeding off your comments about were you meet...and yes it does work..all im saying if people are willing to meet and fuck you...either at theres or ours...then what difference does having a phone chat make..thats what i dont get...i understand about meeting in clubs...because there already there ..it just baffles us...and it really points in one direction..as to there true identities | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club. Then you need to tweek your can accom on your profile...we do meet at ours and other peoples homes..we dont meet in clubs..we also dont cam in the cam rooms..we do on skype...but if the female half of the other couple is not willing to chat on the phone with Missy..then its a no goer lol Well as I said we each work in different ways, saying I haven't accommodated, doesn't mean I won't accommodate... so actually I'm happy with the way my profile is but thanks for the critique. " I have on my profile I don't accommodate though I have in the past for people I consider friends, I would never put can accommodate on my profile because all I get are loads of men wanting to come round for random fucks NOW and I never accommodate anybody on a first meet You make your profile work for you and publish things on a need to know basis People I have never met do not need to know I will accommodate so I don't need to state it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " 4 random people who you've never messaged before who know nothing about you who may not be up for meeting right at this exact minutes? And none accepted? It's fucking time wasters like them who spoil instashag | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " They were probably worried about your age restrictions. Each to their own but I think at nearly 50, your age limit is a bit too low. Just saying ( with puertorican accent) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If somebody sent me a phone number with a first message I wouldn't even reply Why on earth would I want to talk on the phone with somebody I'd never even exchanged a message with I think your lucky you got a reply What part of my posting suggested I sent my phone No with an initial message? Jesus, your so quick to bash a post you don't even take time to read properly - Okay so some of you are happy to message meet and fuck, well perhaps you can appreciate there are some of us who like to confirm one or two things first, namely by speaking. " Don't be so harsh. You omitted details of longstanding communication between yourself and these other girls, as such can be interpreted in a way you did not mean. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club. Then you need to tweek your can accom on your profile...we do meet at ours and other peoples homes..we dont meet in clubs..we also dont cam in the cam rooms..we do on skype...but if the female half of the other couple is not willing to chat on the phone with Missy..then its a no goer lol Well as I said we each work in different ways, saying I haven't accommodated, doesn't mean I won't accommodate... so actually I'm happy with the way my profile is but thanks for the critique. I wasn't criticizing you at all...just feeding off your comments about were you meet...and yes it does work..all im saying if people are willing to meet and fuck you...either at theres or ours...then what difference does having a phone chat make..thats what i dont get...i understand about meeting in clubs...because there already there ..it just baffles us...and it really points in one direction..as to there true identities " I won't argue the point, but if I was to play, I would meet socially first, so a coffee etc, so I feel no need for phone numbers to meet where I would already be or could please myself should someone not show up. I have given my number to a couple people on here,but judge each circumstance individually. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site 4 random people who you've never messaged before who know nothing about you who may not be up for meeting right at this exact minutes? And none accepted? It's fucking time wasters like them who spoil instashag " Insta what!!? I need to read wide | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think most peoplef calling a random number sent in an unsolicited message. The first message is never the right time to swap numbers A random number/unsolicited message - You honestly think I give out my number in a first message? This follows lengthy messaging whereby its time to authenticate one selves. Some can, others can't. Forgive me if I am wrong, but those who don't are very often men There are other ways to see if someone is genuine, including the can rooms in here, showing and.looking at verifications and.following the trail etc, rather than phone numbers. What if people are not showing there veries..or dont want to cam....personally we think it works best talking on the phone..after a few messages...if they dont want that then its pretty obvious...see ewe see it..there willing to give an address..but not a phone number It's not obvious at all, I've never given my address to anyone on here as I've never met in my house. Nor do I give out my phone number to everyone yet look at my veris, I show them to show I do actually meet people and I a real person. A all work different ways but I still wouldn't give my number out unless I was completely confident I was speaking to a real person, or through can or veris or club. Then you need to tweek your can accom on your profile...we do meet at ours and other peoples homes..we dont meet in clubs..we also dont cam in the cam rooms..we do on skype...but if the female half of the other couple is not willing to chat on the phone with Missy..then its a no goer lol Well as I said we each work in different ways, saying I haven't accommodated, doesn't mean I won't accommodate... so actually I'm happy with the way my profile is but thanks for the critique. I have on my profile I don't accommodate though I have in the past for people I consider friends, I would never put can accommodate on my profile because all I get are loads of men wanting to come round for random fucks NOW and I never accommodate anybody on a first meet You make your profile work for you and publish things on a need to know basis People I have never met do not need to know I will accommodate so I don't need to state it " I have men blocked and won't meet couples alone so don't have that issue, but I can appreciate that many ladies certainly do. I always have socials first as well so that helps me with my filtering etc on who I may or may not accommodate. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group " If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. " Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove " Seriously You really think women who don't want to do what people ask are fake? If somebody asks a woman to go on cam or talk on the phone and they say no in your mind the chances are they are fake? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove " So people have to be pushed out of their comfort zone to prove they're 'real' ? As has been said, why not just accept they aren't for you, its almost like when you reject someone and all of a sudden you're a 'fat slag they wouldn't fuck anyway' | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove Seriously You really think women who don't want to do what people ask are fake? If somebody asks a woman to go on cam or talk on the phone and they say no in your mind the chances are they are fake? " Tbh ..yes i do...especially if its supposed to be 2 women chatting...good chances are on here one is a guy | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove " So does that mean all the lovely ladies who have posted above saying they won't give out their phone numbers etc are all fakes? We each work out own ways, for some that is phone calls, for some social coffees first, for some meet in a club. Just because someone doesn't work the way another person does does not make them all fake. It just means they feel other ways of communication and meeting are better for them. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove So people have to be pushed out of their comfort zone to prove they're 'real' ? As has been said, why not just accept they aren't for you, its almost like when you reject someone and all of a sudden you're a 'fat slag they wouldn't fuck anyway'" Nah your missing the whole point of the post i think | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " yep keyboard warriors getting off from abit of female attention | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove So does that mean all the lovely ladies who have posted above saying they won't give out their phone numbers etc are all fakes? We each work out own ways, for some that is phone calls, for some social coffees first, for some meet in a club. Just because someone doesn't work the way another person does does not make them all fake. It just means they feel other ways of communication and meeting are better for them. " Not at all...i said theres a good chance of them being fake if you read it..or even think about whats being said | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove So people have to be pushed out of their comfort zone to prove they're 'real' ? As has been said, why not just accept they aren't for you, its almost like when you reject someone and all of a sudden you're a 'fat slag they wouldn't fuck anyway' Nah your missing the whole point of the post i think " Why? You're saying that if someone won't do what you want them to do (talk on the phone) they must be fake. Maybe they just don't want to talk on the phone!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " Neither of us are under 24 so cant message you...All genuine bi fems are not single | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove So people have to be pushed out of their comfort zone to prove they're 'real' ? As has been said, why not just accept they aren't for you, its almost like when you reject someone and all of a sudden you're a 'fat slag they wouldn't fuck anyway' Nah your missing the whole point of the post i think Why? You're saying that if someone won't do what you want them to do (talk on the phone) they must be fake. Maybe they just don't want to talk on the phone!!" Do you not see the word probably...and yes in my mind if its a new Bi 20year old stunning looks model type then yes i do...its been said a thousand times on here...and i'll repeat myself..your missing the whole point of her post | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If somebody sent me a phone number with a first message I wouldn't even reply Why on earth would I want to talk on the phone with somebody I'd never even exchanged a message with I think your lucky you got a reply What part of my posting suggested I sent my phone No with an initial message? Jesus, your so quick to bash a post you don't even take time to read properly - Okay so some of you are happy to message meet and fuck, well perhaps you can appreciate there are some of us who like to confirm one or two things first, namely by speaking. " I think pretty much everyone contributing to this thread has said they came to the same conclusion from the way you worded your opening post... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove Seriously You really think women who don't want to do what people ask are fake? If somebody asks a woman to go on cam or talk on the phone and they say no in your mind the chances are they are fake? Tbh ..yes i do...especially if its supposed to be 2 women chatting...good chances are on here one is a guy " But its not supposed to be two women chatting its one women want to chat to another that does not want to I've had loads of women and couples ask me to chat on the phone the answer is always no, I'm not willing to do anything I don't want to to prove my gender and I can assure you I'm not male, take your pick if you want to believe that | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove So does that mean all the lovely ladies who have posted above saying they won't give out their phone numbers etc are all fakes? We each work out own ways, for some that is phone calls, for some social coffees first, for some meet in a club. Just because someone doesn't work the way another person does does not make them all fake. It just means they feel other ways of communication and meeting are better for them. Not at all...i said theres a good chance of them being fake if you read it..or even think about whats being said " Amazingly, I did read what was written and what was written was they probably are fake. I reponded by saying not all people work the same way are asked if all the women above are fake for not giving out their number. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove Seriously You really think women who don't want to do what people ask are fake? If somebody asks a woman to go on cam or talk on the phone and they say no in your mind the chances are they are fake? Tbh ..yes i do...especially if its supposed to be 2 women chatting...good chances are on here one is a guy But its not supposed to be two women chatting its one women want to chat to another that does not want to I've had loads of women and couples ask me to chat on the phone the answer is always no, I'm not willing to do anything I don't want to to prove my gender and I can assure you I'm not male, take your pick if you want to believe that " Is anyone questioning your gender !!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. " At last someone who gets it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it " We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group " I always insist on a phone call before a meet. You're not alone. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat..." Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group If that is your way od vetting people that's great, but the people you have spoken to this week obviously have a different way. Why not just accept you don't match with the people you spoke to rather than calling them fake. Because they probably are fake thats why...its been said a thousand times on here..about "females and couple"...running for the hills..when push comes to shove Seriously You really think women who don't want to do what people ask are fake? If somebody asks a woman to go on cam or talk on the phone and they say no in your mind the chances are they are fake? Tbh ..yes i do...especially if its supposed to be 2 women chatting...good chances are on here one is a guy But its not supposed to be two women chatting its one women want to chat to another that does not want to I've had loads of women and couples ask me to chat on the phone the answer is always no, I'm not willing to do anything I don't want to to prove my gender and I can assure you I'm not male, take your pick if you want to believe that Is anyone questioning your gender !!! " No idea Maybe everybody I won't talk on the phone to if they think like you | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group I always insist on a phone call before a meet. You're not alone." Someone else that gets it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else " I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number." Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group I always insist on a phone call before a meet. You're not alone. Someone else that gets it " Gets what? There's no right or wrong or anything to get Some like to chat on the phone some do not You pick people who are compatible to what you want What is there to get? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying " We would want to see verifications prior to a phone chat....yours are hidden , your preferences are for men/boys as we see them as younger than our children,for that reason were out and will not be investing in the product | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol" Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol" You could be talking to anybody on the phone Talking on the phone does not make somebody genuine, does not mean they aren't a nutter or they will turn up, all it really proves is their gender | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Only the now deleted messages would show how a quick chat was the next step. This, following exchanges of messages & photos expressing a desire to supposedly speak. Yet the 4 'girls' in question either suddenly blocked or trotted out the lamest excuses possible the moment I offered to send my number. Suspicious, well obviously not to you, as seemingly speaking to people you intend being intimate with is the last thing you are prepared to do? I on the other hand, prefer checking my hunches and having a conversation that holds more value than any amount of messaging. I stand by my way of vetting and will continue doing so. As stated previously, the only mistake made this week was not calling 4 guys bluff but sharing the experience on here. Hell, at time of writing, even the one couple who supported my post was shot down in flames. I really do shake my head - oh, hell, did I really say that. Now here comes the head shaking support group I always insist on a phone call before a meet. You're not alone. Someone else that gets it Gets what? There's no right or wrong or anything to get Some like to chat on the phone some do not You pick people who are compatible to what you want What is there to get?" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol" You could be talking to 'anyone' on the phone too | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me " We or i tell someone everytime im having a meet !! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me " I've never had any problems either, I've always arranged my meets on here And only made contact through the site, meet in public and take it from there, its how I personally prefer to do things and its worked for me so far | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol You could be talking to 'anyone' on the phone too" Wasn't There a post the other day about someone asking their secretary to ring someone up to say they were who they said they were as the people wanted to talk female to female? That I'm sure was a genuine couple wanting to meet | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol You could be talking to 'anyone' on the phone too" I think theres far less chance than arranging it through just swapping messages on here tbh.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me We or i tell someone everytime im having a meet !! " Yes I do, for my security someone always knows where I am if I am meeting. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol You could be talking to 'anyone' on the phone too Wasn't There a post the other day about someone asking their secretary to ring someone up to say they were who they said they were as the people wanted to talk female to female? That I'm sure was a genuine couple wanting to meet " I had a guy in chameleons club once ask me to talk on the phone to a woman and tell her I was his wife and that we met alone | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me I've never had any problems either, I've always arranged my meets on here And only made contact through the site, meet in public and take it from there, its how I personally prefer to do things and its worked for me so far" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol You could be talking to 'anyone' on the phone too Wasn't There a post the other day about someone asking their secretary to ring someone up to say they were who they said they were as the people wanted to talk female to female? That I'm sure was a genuine couple wanting to meet I had a guy in chameleons club once ask me to talk on the phone to a woman and tell her I was his wife and that we met alone " Haha, I bet that went down well | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me I've never had any problems either, I've always arranged my meets on here And only made contact through the site, meet in public and take it from there, its how I personally prefer to do things and its worked for me so far " I guess its a little different for me as I only meet in clubs full stop, but I'm the same as above, the only people I speak to on the phone are people Ive already met | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " Maybe they think that you are a man masquerading as a woman and will keep pestering them once they call and you have their number | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me I've never had any problems either, I've always arranged my meets on here And only made contact through the site, meet in public and take it from there, its how I personally prefer to do things and its worked for me so far I guess its a little different for me as I only meet in clubs full stop, but I'm the same as above, the only people I speak to on the phone are people Ive already met" I don't even give my number out when I have met, even less reason to need to chat after you have met, infact I used to meet a guy last year we met several times and we never even exchanged names | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Maybe they think that you are a man masquerading as a woman and will keep pestering them once they call and you have their number" To be honest with verifications hidden that would be our first thought | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me I've never had any problems either, I've always arranged my meets on here And only made contact through the site, meet in public and take it from there, its how I personally prefer to do things and its worked for me so far I guess its a little different for me as I only meet in clubs full stop, but I'm the same as above, the only people I speak to on the phone are people Ive already met I don't even give my number out when I have met, even less reason to need to chat after you have met, infact I used to meet a guy last year we met several times and we never even exchanged names " Yeah, me too I just number them sequentially | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better " You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Yeah, me too I just number them sequentially" I don't get that many meets, I'd get to number 1 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else I chat on here, arrange a social meet on here it's not difficult to do whilst not giving out a phone number. Good luck then with that...you could be talking with anyone lol Yes but I arrange a public place, or a club, and tell someone where I will be and when and it's always only a social. It's worked pretty well so far for me I've never had any problems either, I've always arranged my meets on here And only made contact through the site, meet in public and take it from there, its how I personally prefer to do things and its worked for me so far I guess its a little different for me as I only meet in clubs full stop, but I'm the same as above, the only people I speak to on the phone are people Ive already met I don't even give my number out when I have met, even less reason to need to chat after you have met, infact I used to meet a guy last year we met several times and we never even exchanged names Yeah, me too I just number them sequentially" I've met people not knowing their names before, they weren't for me, but I enjoyed a nice coffee with them | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh " No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh " That's what social meets are for Let's be honest till you actually meet you could be anybody no matter how to make contact and even when you meet you don't really know somebody You can never be 100% | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Yeah, me too I just number them sequentially I don't get that many meets, I'd get to number 1 " Bet you do very nicely I am about to hit double digits; about as exciting as when the odometer clicks over 99999 kms | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him " I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh That's what social meets are for Let's be honest till you actually meet you could be anybody no matter how to make contact and even when you meet you don't really know somebody You can never be 100% " I met him socially first before exchanging kik info | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol " Was he good looking? Give him my kik name if he was | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh That's what social meets are for Let's be honest till you actually meet you could be anybody no matter how to make contact and even when you meet you don't really know somebody You can never be 100% " Agreed..i just think its narrowing down or getting the percentages up...we all know who post on these forums...about the number of posts about guys on females or couples profiles...in fact i've reported a few just lately...and gladly admin have acted upon it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol Was he good looking? Give him my kik name if he was " No idea he was using womens pictures...it was only when i went on his profile on here..and found out he was using a pic of me and my GF on his profile that the penny dropped lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol " Sorry I got it wrong | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh That's what social meets are for Let's be honest till you actually meet you could be anybody no matter how to make contact and even when you meet you don't really know somebody You can never be 100% Agreed..i just think its narrowing down or getting the percentages up...we all know who post on these forums...about the number of posts about guys on females or couples profiles...in fact i've reported a few just lately...and gladly admin have acted upon it " I guess because its not something I've ever encountered I'm not as misstrusting as some That's not a dig by the way I've just never had any problems with people pretending to be something they are not so its not something I'm weary of | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol Was he good looking? Give him my kik name if he was No idea he was using womens pictures...it was only when i went on his profile on here..and found out he was using a pic of me and my GF on his profile that the penny dropped lol " Oh there's a woman on here who has my pics on here profile I have her on my hotlist so I can keep tabs on what pics she has up I take it as a compliment she must be really bloody ugly if she's using my pics | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh That's what social meets are for Let's be honest till you actually meet you could be anybody no matter how to make contact and even when you meet you don't really know somebody You can never be 100% Agreed..i just think its narrowing down or getting the percentages up...we all know who post on these forums...about the number of posts about guys on females or couples profiles...in fact i've reported a few just lately...and gladly admin have acted upon it I guess because its not something I've ever encountered I'm not as misstrusting as some That's not a dig by the way I've just never had any problems with people pretending to be something they are not so its not something I'm weary of " Oh im very trusting...but also very wary as well...but there are guys that do it fact..i know ive come across it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol Was he good looking? Give him my kik name if he was No idea he was using womens pictures...it was only when i went on his profile on here..and found out he was using a pic of me and my GF on his profile that the penny dropped lol Oh there's a woman on here who has my pics on here profile I have her on my hotlist so I can keep tabs on what pics she has up I take it as a compliment she must be really bloody ugly if she's using my pics " But you see thats what i dont get...why would they want to...we they ever meet...and if they do..wont people know its not her ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol Was he good looking? Give him my kik name if he was No idea he was using womens pictures...it was only when i went on his profile on here..and found out he was using a pic of me and my GF on his profile that the penny dropped lol Oh there's a woman on here who has my pics on here profile I have her on my hotlist so I can keep tabs on what pics she has up I take it as a compliment she must be really bloody ugly if she's using my pics But you see thats what i dont get...why would they want to...we they ever meet...and if they do..wont people know its not her ? " She has verifications so she has met, the pics aren't face one or one that if you met you would know for a fact they aren't hers, there's a few old foot wanks ones I used to have on my profile and a few arse and leg shots, and one of my muff And let's me honest how many times have to meet somebody and looked at their feet or fanny and thought. ....that's not her | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Giving numbers out is a mistake. Kik is better You really think KIK is better...how come...you really literally could be anyone on KIK tbh No numbers involved. And I use kik to chat to Grey and Skype. I know it's him I think were talking about strangers on here...i had a "girl" on my KIK...turns out it was a guy lol Was he good looking? Give him my kik name if he was No idea he was using womens pictures...it was only when i went on his profile on here..and found out he was using a pic of me and my GF on his profile that the penny dropped lol Oh there's a woman on here who has my pics on here profile I have her on my hotlist so I can keep tabs on what pics she has up I take it as a compliment she must be really bloody ugly if she's using my pics But you see thats what i dont get...why would they want to...we they ever meet...and if they do..wont people know its not her ? She has verifications so she has met, the pics aren't face one or one that if you met you would know for a fact they aren't hers, there's a few old foot wanks ones I used to have on my profile and a few arse and leg shots, and one of my muff And let's me honest how many times have to meet somebody and looked at their feet or fanny and thought. ....that's not her " Personally i like to look at the fanny | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Neither of us are under 24 so cant message you...All genuine bi fems are not single " You serious? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If somebody sent me a phone number with a first message I wouldn't even reply Why on earth would I want to talk on the phone with somebody I'd never even exchanged a message with I think your lucky you got a reply What part of my posting suggested I sent my phone No with an initial message? Jesus, your so quick to bash a post you don't even take time to read properly - Okay so some of you are happy to message meet and fuck, well perhaps you can appreciate there are some of us who like to confirm one or two things first, namely by speaking. " Agree with this, people assuming phone number with first message but nothing in your post to even suggest you did that. I personally wouldn't meet anyone either that wouldn't speak on the phone. Everyone has their own verification methods, doesn't mean yours is wrong and theres is right | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey OP I'm bi too and also experience a lot of fake couples/female profiles where there is no ovaries present. I usually ask to Skype first. It's anonymous as you use a username not your mob number and sorts out the fakes! Good point, and perhaps that's the way to go. That said, a quick chat has bought results in the past, unfortunately not so this week. The only other mistake this week was sharing on here. " And how does skype with anon user name ensure someone is real and meets | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " Can safely say I am not pretending to be a woman, I am actually pretending to be a TV. Could it be they could be scared off by your forwardness, some might need to work up to a meet. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying " I am not sure anyone said they don't have a phone chat , more that they wouldn't exchange phone numbers after a first mail | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If somebody sent me a phone number with a first message I wouldn't even reply Why on earth would I want to talk on the phone with somebody I'd never even exchanged a message with I think your lucky you got a reply " Totally agree! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " I don't like talking on the phone. No one has ever asked me to either. It's ok to be on here even with other people about as no one can tell you're on here, yet if I were having a fab conversation on a phone, it's likely to get sexual quite quickly. We all know there are men on sites like this who pretend to be women. Maybe the ladies you contacted just didn't fancy further contact? A myriad of unknown reasons......why worry? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Nope we think your right to make that assumption..not only with females....lots og guys on couples profiles...and its so obvious So anyone who won't give you their number is a fake? I've been told I'm a man so many times now I think I might be starting to grow a tiny penis " Stay off the steroids? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Maybe they just dont want to talk, I never hand my number out, if anybody asks me to chat on the phone I just say no, if that means people think I'm a man so be it I didn't want to talk to them anyway " This! I don't talk to my own friends on the phone. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying I am not sure anyone said they don't have a phone chat , more that they wouldn't exchange phone numbers after a first mail" Dont think shes said after the first message either | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Like others on here our number only goes out to folk we are meeting or know and having kids meens we can't just go out at drop of a hat. Which tbh is a pity when a hot lady or couple, suddenly pm us out of the blue. At last someone who gets it We all get it, and looking at the post above it says.only if they are meeting, not for an initial chat... Geez...doesn't an initial chat normally lead to a meet..whether it be a social or anything else " No, we used to say yes to phone chats but never ended up meeting thise we chatted to for one reason or another, yet had loads of meets with people we hadn't talked to first. I hate talking on the phone, its too awkward on here, and i won't do it now, we meet and go from there... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying I am not sure anyone said they don't have a phone chat , more that they wouldn't exchange phone numbers after a first mail Dont think shes said after the first message either " She didn't say after many messages either so without clarification in the first post I am answering on how I read it | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying I am not sure anyone said they don't have a phone chat , more that they wouldn't exchange phone numbers after a first mail Dont think shes said after the first message either She didn't say after many messages either so without clarification in the first post I am answering on how I read it" So you made assumptions that it was after or with the first message !!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Maybe they just dont want to talk, I never hand my number out, if anybody asks me to chat on the phone I just say no, if that means people think I'm a man so be it I didn't want to talk to them anyway This! I don't talk to my own friends on the phone. " As if you have friends...hahaha | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I keep everything on Fabs, (safety and all that) Us single bi fems also have a life out side fabs. YES really we do. We don't sit here waiting for cocks to be offered so we can jump on them and be grateful they have been offered to us poor single lonely fems. Same as we sit here wishing for pics of cocks to be sent. We do kinda know what they look like. I don't have time for socials and would not have time either for a chat on here or phone. " But the threads not about guys...its about females..bi ones at that...and something you have probably not come across seen as your not looking for single females or couples !!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying " How on earth would chatting to someone on the phone stop any of that? All it shows is you spoke to a woman. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying How on earth would chatting to someone on the phone stop any of that? All it shows is you spoke to a woman. " As i thought lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I keep everything on Fabs, (safety and all that) Us single bi fems also have a life out side fabs. YES really we do. We don't sit here waiting for cocks to be offered so we can jump on them and be grateful they have been offered to us poor single lonely fems. Same as we sit here wishing for pics of cocks to be sent. We do kinda know what they look like. I don't have time for socials and would not have time either for a chat on here or phone. " I don't talk on the phone or on cam either when me and my boyfriend are meeting men OR women. If they don't like it they can just stop messaging us. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying I am not sure anyone said they don't have a phone chat , more that they wouldn't exchange phone numbers after a first mail Dont think shes said after the first message either She didn't say after many messages either so without clarification in the first post I am answering on how I read it So you made assumptions that it was after or with the first message !!!" Yes, just like you made the assumption it was after many. My view, you don't have to agree | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Maybe they just dont want to talk, I never hand my number out, if anybody asks me to chat on the phone I just say no, if that means people think I'm a man so be it I didn't want to talk to them anyway This! I don't talk to my own friends on the phone. As if you have friends...hahaha " Cheeky bugger! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"An aside to all the above, I am nothing short of staggered so many purport to meet ahead of having authenticated who you have exchanged messages with via a telephone chat. Small wonder so many threads abound of disappointed meets not to mention exchanged videos ending up on sex sites etc. Cautious, you bet and that's the way I'm staying I am not sure anyone said they don't have a phone chat , more that they wouldn't exchange phone numbers after a first mail Dont think shes said after the first message either She didn't say after many messages either so without clarification in the first post I am answering on how I read it So you made assumptions that it was after or with the first message !!! Yes, just like you made the assumption it was after many. My view, you don't have to agree " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Maybe they just dont want to talk, I never hand my number out, if anybody asks me to chat on the phone I just say no, if that means people think I'm a man so be it I didn't want to talk to them anyway This! I don't talk to my own friends on the phone. As if you have friends...hahaha Cheeky bugger! " Yup. Bored. Feeling mischievous | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site " Everyone has their own approach and way of doing things on here. No one is right and equally no one is wrong! Just because someone doesn't exchange numbers or want to chat on the phone, doesn't automatically make them fake. If someone thinks we're fake because we won't dance to their tune, so be it. Just means, we weren't suited anyway. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Neither of us are under 24 so cant message you...All genuine bi fems are not single You serious? " I think "not" is in the wrong place. Try "not all..." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Since Monday, I have messaged 4 separate Bi-fems offering my number for a quick chat. Latest excuse 'Sorry I'm baby sitting' (Yet continues to trawl FS) Am I wrong to suspect men might just be masquerading as girls on this site Neither of us are under 24 so cant message you...All genuine bi fems are not single You serious? " Blonde moment | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If somebody sent me a phone number with a first message I wouldn't even reply Why on earth would I want to talk on the phone with somebody I'd never even exchanged a message with I think your lucky you got a reply Totally agree! " Amazing, 6 hrs later and still the Waffen FS marches on ... Let me explain yet again, Oh never mind | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |