FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Where's the manners
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " All it means is they're not interested. Why must they reply? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " Read the FAQ | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " Yes Read the FAQ, and do a forum search, which will enlighten you | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Never expect! It's an easier way to avoid frustration" Suppose it is just frustration, was just wondering cause I would always reply with an answer but guess it does get annoying if your a f or couple and get endless messages | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? Read the FAQ" But saying it 30 times a day gets draining.... Plus you get the " why not" or abusive messages that take up more time... Oh and how can you reply to a " hi how's you" message with sorry no thanks? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There is nothing more annoying than this topic coming up every day Op do you need rejection in writing, will an inbox full of negativity make you feel better?" I was thinking the same thing | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"But what difference would a inbox of messages saying 'thanks but no thanks' make? And too often a 'no thanks' leads to more messages....and abuse 'Fuck off you fat slag !' Yeah well 5 minutes ago you wanted to fuck this fat slag " This | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Never expect! It's an easier way to avoid frustration Suppose it is just frustration, was just wondering cause I would always reply with an answer but guess it does get annoying if your a f or couple and get endless messages " Some one I mail gets 180 messages a day... I was lucky! You van never expect a reply and see a no as a polite turn me down. As stated by others no matter how polite a turn down is, they often get abuse in the next message! Be patient | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " What if they replied and said "your having a fucking bubble mate, small cock and face like a dustbin lid" ? Far better to be ignored and think you're too good than be replied to and told otherwise. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Never expect! It's an easier way to avoid frustration Suppose it is just frustration, was just wondering cause I would always reply with an answer but guess it does get annoying if your a f or couple and get endless messages Some one I mail gets 180 messages a day... I was lucky! You van never expect a reply and see a no as a polite turn me down. As stated by others no matter how polite a turn down is, they often get abuse in the next message! Be patient" Yea I know, cheers for advice mate | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Never expect! It's an easier way to avoid frustration Suppose it is just frustration, was just wondering cause I would always reply with an answer but guess it does get annoying if your a f or couple and get endless messages Some one I mail gets 180 messages a day... I was lucky! You van never expect a reply and see a no as a polite turn me down. As stated by others no matter how polite a turn down is, they often get abuse in the next message! Be patient" Isn't 'Be patient' Shag's line?? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I've currently got 78 messages in my inbox. I can tell within content of the first line of the message without opening it that all 78 have failed to read my profile If I've gone to the effort to write a profile I find it rude they don't read it. They can't be arsed to read my profile I can't be arsed to read their message" Yea fair point, never really thought of it that way hahaha | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? What if they replied and said "your having a fucking bubble mate, small cock and face like a dustbin lid" ? Far better to be ignored and think you're too good than be replied to and told otherwise. " That's not what I said Steve Was face like a saucepan lid | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Never expect! It's an easier way to avoid frustration Suppose it is just frustration, was just wondering cause I would always reply with an answer but guess it does get annoying if your a f or couple and get endless messages Some one I mail gets 180 messages a day... I was lucky! You van never expect a reply and see a no as a polite turn me down. As stated by others no matter how polite a turn down is, they often get abuse in the next message! Be patient Isn't 'Be patient' Shag's line?? " It is, but I usually pinch it if he's nit around | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Never expect! It's an easier way to avoid frustration Suppose it is just frustration, was just wondering cause I would always reply with an answer but guess it does get annoying if your a f or couple and get endless messages Some one I mail gets 180 messages a day... I was lucky! You van never expect a reply and see a no as a polite turn me down. As stated by others no matter how polite a turn down is, they often get abuse in the next message! Be patient Isn't 'Be patient' Shag's line?? It is, but I usually pinch it if he's nit around " ^ not | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If it's a decent message I usually reply. If it is a Hi, Hows you? Meet now - then I just delete. If they can't be bothered to put in even the tiniest bit of effort then neither can I." That makes a heap of sense. And anything abusive should get an instant block....but I'm sorry, I do agree that manners cost very little. A simple cut and paste takes hardly any longer than a delete.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Saucepan lid...... " isn't 'pan lid' some kind of slang for kid? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " Did you read her profile fully? Did she say, "I'll f**k with anyone" or did she have a list of requirements? Did you meet ALL of those requirements? If you did meet ALL of those requirements, then maybe she did not find you attractive and in which case, she. I feel, should have sent you a message saying, "no thanks"; that is what I would do and then block However, if you wrote to her even though you did not meet ALL her requirements, then you are the one without manners, not her. Although, I am sure that wasn't the case | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I've currently got 78 messages in my inbox. I can tell within content of the first line of the message without opening it that all 78 have failed to read my profile If I've gone to the effort to write a profile I find it rude they don't read it. They can't be arsed to read my profile I can't be arsed to read their message" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " so what you would like... "there there there, you go champ!!! but not for us" or how about this "fuck off!!!!" or how about this...... "good god no!!!!" or how about this..... silence.... just nothing see... i don't see that no reply is any better than those...... needing a reply is just... needy!!!! they don't owe you a reply just because you wrote to them.... you are not owed a reply because you sent something!! next time a takeaway pamphlet comes thru your door.... ask yourself if you ever send them a no thanks!!! i think it also needs a mindset adjustment that everything is no reply until you get a reply..... that way, no angst.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If it's a decent message I usually reply. If it is a Hi, Hows you? Meet now - then I just delete. If they can't be bothered to put in even the tiniest bit of effort then neither can I. That makes a heap of sense. And anything abusive should get an instant block....but I'm sorry, I do agree that manners cost very little. A simple cut and paste takes hardly any longer than a delete.... " And a simple C&P of a decent message doesn't take that long either. They didn't bother so neither do I | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " this is a pretty common complaint unfortunately it will never be answered to your satisfaction ,if you message a woman who is very attractive this will always be a problem even if you get friendly with them ,the volume of message they get they can't cope with but even those that aren't getting hundreds of messages a day can't cope some are just not interested because of your look or pic selection ,many different reasons so where I agree you are right it is rude it won't change | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"if you had the manners to read the rules of the site you joined, you'd see that a no reply is to be taken as a polite no thankyou " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If it's a decent message I usually reply. If it is a Hi, Hows you? Meet now - then I just delete. If they can't be bothered to put in even the tiniest bit of effort then neither can I. That makes a heap of sense. And anything abusive should get an instant block....but I'm sorry, I do agree that manners cost very little. A simple cut and paste takes hardly any longer than a delete.... " Of course you do. You're seeing it from your point of view. From a woman's point of view it can look very different. Very often men are expecting women to bother replying when they haven't bothered, (to read and respect the profile, to write a decent message, etc), at all themselves. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? this is a pretty common complaint unfortunately it will never be answered to your satisfaction ,if you message a woman who is very attractive this will always be a problem even if you get friendly with them ,the volume of message they get they can't cope with but even those that aren't getting hundreds of messages a day can't cope some are just not interested because of your look or pic selection ,many different reasons so where I agree you are right it is rude it won't change " It's not rude. Nobody asked them to message, they chose to. They're not owed anything. Just as they can chose to use their time to message, the recipient can chose to use their time to reply or not. Nobody is entitled to another person's time just because they're on this site. It's rather arrogant and rude to think you are. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Nothing more annoying when you message someone and they just delete your message with no reply. What's happened to manners? A simple reply saying not for us or me would be a lot better than just deleting message. Am I wrong in saying this? " Yep, you're wrong!!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have filters on most of the time so randoms can't message me. If i take my filters off and reply no thanks to randoms message me i cannot reblock them with filters when i put them back on. Not interested is saying no thanks." Also a good point. Responding to people you're not interested in gives them carte blanche to message you whenever in the future, regardless of your filter settings, unless you specifically block them. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have filters on most of the time so randoms can't message me. If i take my filters off and reply no thanks to randoms message me i cannot reblock them with filters when i put them back on. Not interested is saying no thanks. Also a good point. Responding to people you're not interested in gives them carte blanche to message you whenever in the future, regardless of your filter settings, unless you specifically block them." I didn't type that properly and missed out some words but yeah you got what i meant. My blocklist broke on my other profile so i'm keeping this blocklist as small as possible. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |