FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Angry men
Angry men
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *andk OP Couple
over a year ago
Wisbech |
I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don't see why people feel the need to abuse people if they have their message deleted, happens all the time to me but then ago I don't have a sensitive oversized ego. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap"
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I get why people get frustrated but stick filters on and contact those that interest you.
Saves any rejection issues in your inbox. A no thanks button will yield the same results so would be useless |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The easiest course of action is to ignore or block. "
or set filters...its all easily achievable..
I mostly always send a thanks back if they aren't interested..I'd say people who actually care about their profile(such as myself, dont want facing bans etc by sending abusive messages), I'll be fucked if I'm restarting my profile by calling someone a few names for rejecting me lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?"
Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?
Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. "
Forums good for discussions etc... not necessarily as a forms of comms |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?
Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. "
If you think that the offenders actually read the forum you are sadly mistaken. You won't change the behaviour of the masses so why not change what you have control over? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don't have that problem anymore but used to get it on my old profile. Just report and ignore or you could always thank them for confirming your decision to not want to meet them as the correct one, that always goes down well  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I really dislike it when people name people in their status and then write a negative forum post about them. It's about as close as you can get to naming and shaming without actually doing it.
I'm honestly not sure it's much better than sending you the mean pm. At least they kept their shit private.
-Courtney |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I really dislike it when people name people in their status and then write a negative forum post about them. It's about as close as you can get to naming and shaming without actually doing it.
I'm honestly not sure it's much better than sending you the mean pm. At least they kept their shit private.
-Courtney"
naming N shaming on a status is already reportable |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I really dislike it when people name people in their status and then write a negative forum post about them. It's about as close as you can get to naming and shaming without actually doing it.
I'm honestly not sure it's much better than sending you the mean pm. At least they kept their shit private.
-Courtney"
Oh dear, not nice at all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Block all messages. Do the searches and messaging yourself. "
 Works for me. I am giggling a little at the fact he describes himself as respectful but ho hum, as someone else said, such drama, its just a storm in a D cup! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?
Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect.
If you think that the offenders actually read the forum you are sadly mistaken. You won't change the behaviour of the masses so why not change what you have control over?"
I'm not one to moan about it. I just reply to who i want and ignore the rest. But the ones I ignore for almost a year still don't get the hint. So I can see why others feel the need to have a rant. Each to there own right! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I see many people these days are using their message filters correctly to stop those they don't want from being able to message them, thus preventing 200 odd messages in the first place and making things much more manageable to deal with. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Personally, I think the site should get rid of the function to see what a recipient has done with a message, it causes so much angst (either that or people just need to chill a little). I used to read all my messages, save the ones I was interested in replying to and do a bulk delete of my inbox but to the person I'd saved the message it would show as deleted. I did have abuse for deleting without reply but they didn't know I'd saved it to reply to at a later time but in doing so, it showed me they are not the types I wanted to meet therefore I had one less message to reply to! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not whinging just wondering, maybe Iam missing the point in "swingers chat""
Chat about what u like. Im sick of other users moaning about what people write on forums. Freedom of fucking speech people.. like you have all just had on this thread. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I politely request in my initial message , that if she is uninspired that she block me xx
The number that then waste their time sending a message , informing me they have no interest but won't block me because they don't want to seem that they are doing as told ,is quite simply astounding
Not interested great , block me saves me messaging again a month later when I've forgotten that I had sent but no reply  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I see many people these days are using their message filters correctly to stop those they don't want from being able to message them, thus preventing 200 odd messages in the first place and making things much more manageable to deal with."
To add I think messages you sent that aren't read should automatically be deleted within 24 hours this would also prevent so many issues unless of course you opt to save them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I see many people these days are using their message filters correctly to stop those they don't want from being able to message them, thus preventing 200 odd messages in the first place and making things much more manageable to deal with.
To add I think messages you sent that aren't read should automatically be deleted within 24 hours this would also prevent so many issues unless of course you opt to save them."
But not everyone is on here everyday. I think they delete after around 2 weeks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it . 
Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today..  "
Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I don't often initiate messages with a _iew to meeting. I do sometimes say 'good photos' if someone has taken the time and effort to produce something pleasing to my eye, I don't look to see anyone's read them, I don't do 'follow up' messages. Any nasty messages just get deleted and the perp blocked.
It makes for an easier and happier fab
experience. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *odareyouMan
over a year ago
not far from iceland,,,,,, tescos is nearer though :-) (near leeds) |
Maybe they had tourettes.. fuc*..shitty wank...wank bollocks.. sorry.
Apparently science is working on a theory that blow jobs help....
Any ladies wanna help with this research ..apply to johnsoda0204
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *osieWoman
over a year ago
Wembley |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap"
You are lucky that you only get abused AFTER you say "no thanks". I get 'abused in anticipation' because he knows for a fact that a "no thanks" will be off the moment he hits the send button
One told me that I look like a "dog's dinner"; maybe he did not realise that the facial photographs are blurred and I don't actually look like that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *osieWoman
over a year ago
Wembley |
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it .
Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today..
Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim? "
Nice idea
However, the 'lads' do have a choice just like everyone else. Don't send a message; wait for those who are interested to send one first |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it .
Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today..
Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim?
Nice idea
However, the 'lads' do have a choice just like everyone else. Don't send a message; wait for those who are interested to send one first"
I would only ever have received one message then as that is the sum total of messages initiated by women to myself  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Whilst not condoning abusive messages, come on lads, roll with the punches eh? I do find this post a little strange. The OP deleted unread a message from someone, only to receive an abusive message, which they then opened.... erm.....?
Personally if I get a message from someone who I will not reply too, or even read the message of, then I would block them, that way everyone is appraised of the situation.... without offensive words. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap"
200 a day..... ..every day? surely you jest |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *imiUKMan
over a year ago
Hereford |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?"
Today, you are my favourite. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?
Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect. "
It's a single button. 'Block sender' appears at the top of the message. It's just as easy as clicking a single button that would say 'no thanks'. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
But if you were so willing to delete the first message unread, why are you willing to open, what through experience you have gained, will be an abusive message? Can't you just report the member for multiple messaging or...
... now here's a wacky idea, control the messages you see, by (here goes...) blocking ALL single men from messaging first, and then only messaging those single guys you have decided suit your requirements, I believe once you message someone any filters you may have put in place are void for that contact.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?
Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect.
It's a single button. 'Block sender' appears at the top of the message. It's just as easy as clicking a single button that would say 'no thanks'."
The amount of profiles claiming to be women who won't block is astounding |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"But if you were so willing to delete the first message unread, why are you willing to open, what through experience you have gained, will be an abusive message? Can't you just report the member for multiple messaging or...
... now here's a wacky idea, control the messages you see, by (here goes...) blocking ALL single men from messaging first, and then only messaging those single guys you have decided suit your requirements, I believe once you message someone any filters you may have put in place are void for that contact.."
Maybe they deleted a whole load of messages unread when they had a silly amount to deal with and couldn't get through them then maybe the second message came in when they had a pretty empty inbox so had more time to open it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap
Instead of whinging on the forums in a kind of weird 'look at us' post, why don't you just block the people so that they can't message you again?
Because it's easier to post about it so guys get the hint rather than spend all day blocking each individual. Guys and girls just need to learn a bit if respect.
It's a single button. 'Block sender' appears at the top of the message. It's just as easy as clicking a single button that would say 'no thanks'.
The amount of profiles claiming to be women who won't block is astounding "
I don't block unless someone messages me something offensive or they won't take no for an answer.
I don't really see the point.
But then I don't get 200million messages a day, so it's not exactly a problem for me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"200 a day.......every day? surely you jest
I get like 3-4 a day, so I'm now feeling totally inadequate.
I'll send you one but I don't know what to say; xxx
I got it: "wanna f**k?"  "
Ooh, you are awful... but I like you! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why get angry. .. a no is a no , get over it .
Some can't accept that though sadly... As I have found out today..
Sadly I can see both sides of the coin but there is no need for anger, maybe publishing stats on everyone's profile may show who replies and who doesn't and also how many messages the user has waiting to be read that way us lads may decide against messaging someone as the chances of them replying or reading them is slim?
Nice idea
However, the 'lads' do have a choice just like everyone else. Don't send a message; wait for those who are interested to send one first"
My response rate would be really really high. Doesn't change anything as my filters still stop people messaging
I send messages, I don't go into the sent box afterwards
I figure they'll all delete eventually but have over the years said on this forum it should be scrapped |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *aeBabeWoman
over a year ago
London |
"I know it's been discussed before but surely if we delete a message without replying can't it be taken as NO THANKS and doesn't need a barrage of abuse. We're not being rude We're getting 200 messages a day and would need a full time PA to answer them all. Can't fab do a no thanks button you can just tap"
Increase filters, intermittent blocking all messages to control inbox and SPECIFIC wants for your perfect meet indicated in your profile.
Next xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
As I say, and again I am not condoning abusive messages, quite frankly, anyone that sends an abusive message on this site, should be reported and banned after re_iew (let them make another profile, they may think twice on the content of their message next time, and remember those with verifications may think twice before sending that message).
However this site puts YOU in control, you can manage the messages you receive by filters. If I was on here as a couple that occasionally met with single guys, then I would initiate the contact with said guy after discussing it with my partner... no 2 million messages a day, no abusive messages, happy life? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don't have that problem anymore but used to get it on my old profile. Just report and ignore or you could always thank them for confirming your decision to not want to meet them as the correct one, that always goes down well "
Lol that's what we do |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
