|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Poor old Tommy Sherridan, they must be feeling pretty shot at right now. Story below is worth a read, I couldn't help a chuckle at the bit where it goes 'You must be Gail!', I can just imagine it happenining
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-11574745
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
For once Cupids gets a write up in national if not international media its:-
"There was minging decor - old carpets, dingy lighting"
Bet they are well pleased. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Ha! Yes, it's all glamour and glitz isn't it?
And another thing- why do the tabloids always talk about "three in a bed sex"? Makes it sound like something from a carry on film! (not to mention there usually isn't a bed in sight ) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ha! Yes, it's all glamour and glitz isn't it?
And another thing- why do the tabloids always talk about "three in a bed sex"? Makes it sound like something from a carry on film! (not to mention there usually isn't a bed in sight ) "
LOL - love it - esp the mentions of Cupids - 3 in a bed was correct - there were 3 of them in the bed! Z |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Fair play, there was a bed! Lol. Going a little off topic now, but do you reckon the papers will ever be able to say the words "blow job"? Or are we forever doomed to the vague and slightly ridiculous "sex act"? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
haven't read this story
won't read this story
refuse to buy/read/support any newspapers while they write stories dissing sexual preferences whilst making advertising revenue from sex adverts.
But as long as people buy newspapers to read such things they will continue to do it, which means it will be with us forever, just not with my money |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"haven't read this story
won't read this story
refuse to buy/read/support any newspapers while they write stories dissing sexual preferences whilst making advertising revenue from sex adverts.
But as long as people buy newspapers to read such things they will continue to do it, which means it will be with us forever, just not with my money "
How can you comment without reading the story - the main thrust wasn't actually about swinging it was more to do with perjury - they weren't actually 'dissing' swinging - well - not directly! Z |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic