FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > How trustworthy to bareback FuckBuddy? how Can you trust anyone who live far from you as FuckBuddy
How trustworthy to bareback FuckBuddy? how Can you trust anyone who live far from you as FuckBuddy
Jump to: Newest in thread
Is people naive or gullible regard fucking FuckBuddy bareback. No matter how constant both of you go for screening in your local Gum clinic.the only person you can trust is your partner that live under the same roof with you.
Not someone living 50 miles away from you.
I know everything on the swing scene involved risk. But how can you trust someone who doesn't live with you.? All in the name of FuckBuddy.
for some couple they wont meet up with FuckBuddy couple due to some obvious reasons. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is people naive or gullible regard fucking FuckBuddy bareback. No matter how constant both of you go for screening in your local Gum clinic.the only person you can trust is your partner that live under the same roof with you.
Not someone living 50 miles away from you.
I know everything on the swing scene involved risk. But how can you trust someone who doesn't live with you.? All in the name of FuckBuddy.
for some couple they wont meet up with FuckBuddy couple due to some obvious reasons. "
Sometimes you have to take a leap of faith. Even your partner cab fuck around behind your back so what makes them more trust worthy? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
People are adults and know the risks. If they choose to go bare that's up to them. As has been said further up you could be married or in a LTR living with someone and they could be fucking around and pass an STI on to you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
wow........ really |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
Eh???  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
that's extremely naive... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
Wtf lol I'm lost on your comment can you please come and find me and put it into English please  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things. "
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
So AIDS is something only homosexual and bisexual men get?!
crystal |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
Eek really to be that uneducated or that naive in this day and age is scary |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"you don't realy know someone until you live with them, especialy if you have been married for over 30 years."
You don't even necessarily know someone then, I've seen/heard of plenty of cases of people being in a seemingly trustworthy relationship for a long time that have been up to allsorts |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"you don't realy know someone until you live with them, especialy if you have been married for over 30 years.
You don't even necessarily know someone then, I've seen/heard of plenty of cases of people being in a seemingly trustworthy relationship for a long time that have been up to allsorts "
yes I know. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
Chlamydia
Trichomoniasis (Trich)
Gonorrhea
Human Papillomavirus (HPV)
Genital Herpes
Syphilis
HIV
Hepatitis B Virus (HBV)
Hepatitis C
take a wee read through the above, it might save your life....  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
...I have no words! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf"
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
...I have no words!"
Baffling isn't it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids."
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV "
HOW did they get it? That's the point. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
HOW did they get it? That's the point. "
Heterosexuals got it by having sex with an affected person of the opposite sex.
How have people living in the UK acquired their HIV?
Over 95% of people living with HIV in the UK will have acquired HIV through sex without a condom. People living with HIV who were exposed through heterosexual sex are the largest group, though those exposed through sex between men is a close second.
- See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/People-with-HIV-in-UK.aspx#.dpuf |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV "
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids."
Ahhh stupidity the gift that keeps giving! You are 38 FFS! Do you still believe in Father Christmas as well?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"you don't realy know someone until you live with them, especialy if you have been married for over 30 years.
You don't even necessarily know someone then, I've seen/heard of plenty of cases of people being in a seemingly trustworthy relationship for a long time that have been up to allsorts "
Indeed! My friend only found out her husband of 33 years was a cheat when the police knocked on her door to inform her her husband had died: in flagrante delicto.
To add insult to injury, as he died out of the county she had to pay to bring his body back! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
HOW did they get it? That's the point. "
the bad gay fairy gave it to them.... it's easier to explain it that way.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation."
And the part about woman who got it? 25% nearly all who got it through heterosexual sex? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"you don't realy know someone until you live with them, especialy if you have been married for over 30 years.
You don't even necessarily know someone then, I've seen/heard of plenty of cases of people being in a seemingly trustworthy relationship for a long time that have been up to allsorts
Indeed! My friend only found out her husband of 33 years was a cheat when the police knocked on her door to inform her her husband had died: in flagrante delicto.
To add insult to injury, as he died out of the county she had to pay to bring his body back!"
yes it happens, maybe she wasn't a very good judge of character. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation.
And the part about woman who got it? 25% nearly all who got it through heterosexual sex? "
From whom do you think they got it from given most men get it from homosexual sex?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation.
And the part about woman who got it? 25% nearly all who got it through heterosexual sex?
From whom do you think they got it from given most men get it from homosexual sex?
"
That's not the point. Further up you said it is incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get it. Not that difficult if at least a 1/4 of all new cases last year were people that only practice heterosexual sex. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids."
Nominations for next years Darwin Awards....JacksonJ goes top of my list....such ignorance is staggering! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation."
And 1 in 3 were straight which kind of dismissed your original post doesn't it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I really do wonder about some of the 'adults' on this site sometimes
Only sometimes. "
Well I admit it's been more and more often over the festive season Hilda |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids."
The statistics "follow". Do you actually think you have to do BOTH of these things in a particular order in order to get HIV?
My god Jackson...... Where did you learn to read English? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I really do wonder about some of the 'adults' on this site sometimes
Sometimes I think we were separated at birth!  "
That just made me laugh out loud  and you've won my award for the comment of the year |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
you cant trust anyone and no one should trust you unfortunately its totally not safe.i have had guy's asking me to receive bare back sex stating they are married and.....does that mean you are safe no! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation.
And the part about woman who got it? 25% nearly all who got it through heterosexual sex?
From whom do you think they got it from given most men get it from homosexual sex?
That's not the point. Further up you said it is incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get it. Not that difficult if at least a 1/4 of all new cases last year were people that only practice heterosexual sex. "
You are attempting a straw man here. What I said was...
To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like."
Note I said not impossible for heterosexuals but implied its dependant upon high risk partners.
Some incredibly dumb or down right dishonest posters here. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I met a doctor who was married and didn't use condoms on another site.
its not uncommon, but I would prefer to trust my husband than some bloke who I see for sex now and then, however nice he is.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation.
And 1 in 3 were straight which kind of dismissed your original post doesn't it?"
That's logically dishonest. More than likely IV drug users. But yes a tiny percentage possibly straight.....but having sex with a partner contacted it from a partner in a high risk group.
Some really uneducated people here with no logical thinking skills. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *adgodCouple
over a year ago
Greensburg |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation.
And the part about woman who got it? 25% nearly all who got it through heterosexual sex?
From whom do you think they got it from given most men get it from homosexual sex?
That's not the point. Further up you said it is incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get it. Not that difficult if at least a 1/4 of all new cases last year were people that only practice heterosexual sex.
You are attempting a straw man here. What I said was...
To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like."
Note I said not impossible for heterosexuals but implied its dependant upon high risk partners.
Some incredibly dumb or down right dishonest posters here."
Lol. Thought you were trying to be clever somehow, but you are simply beyond ignorant. That has to be one of the most idiotic statements ever. You couldn't be more wrong.....factually. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation.
And 1 in 3 were straight which kind of dismissed your original post doesn't it?
That's logically dishonest. More than likely IV drug users. But yes a tiny percentage possibly straight.....but having sex with a partner contacted it from a partner in a high risk group.
Some really uneducated people here with no logical thinking skills."
2% of cases are from drug use |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Is people naive or gullible regard fucking FuckBuddy bareback. No matter how constant both of you go for screening in your local Gum clinic.the only person you can trust is your partner that live under the same roof with you.
Not someone living 50 miles away from you.
I know everything on the swing scene involved risk. But how can you trust someone who doesn't live with you.? All in the name of FuckBuddy.
for some couple they wont meet up with FuckBuddy couple due to some obvious reasons. "
No one can be absolutely 100% confident that their FB or FWB is faithful or using condoms with other partners. Although there are usually clues that one can pick up on to give some confidence, though still not 100% foolproof. So one will have to use their own judgement.
I trust my partner on here who's a FWB, being a scientist in the know , I can't help but trust him.
It's a shame that some people may not meet up with people whom have this arrangement, as other previous posters have said, it's been known that live-in partners to cheat.
Portia |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids.
You're contradicting yourself. Those statistics show that plenty of heterosexuals contract HIV
Your quote even proves my point
75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex"
From your citation.
And the part about woman who got it? 25% nearly all who got it through heterosexual sex?
From whom do you think they got it from given most men get it from homosexual sex?
That's not the point. Further up you said it is incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get it. Not that difficult if at least a 1/4 of all new cases last year were people that only practice heterosexual sex.
You are attempting a straw man here. What I said was...
To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like."
Note I said not impossible for heterosexuals but implied its dependant upon high risk partners.
Some incredibly dumb or down right dishonest posters here.
Lol. Thought you were trying to be clever somehow, but you are simply beyond ignorant. That has to be one of the most idiotic statements ever. You couldn't be more wrong.....factually. "
Yep you nailed it with that rely. Name calling always makes a good point that's hard to refute. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Likewise, I've met a lovely Mr Surgeon and his GP wife at Chams last year...and when the discussion broached the condom matter I was rather surprised by their response. They were both pretty up front with regards to bareback. They did mention that their greatest concerns were Hep B, but as most medical and law agencies are vaccinated that issue appears to be resolved.
For those who attend clubs, its not difficult to _iew folks who prefer to abstain from protection - it's an adult choice regardless of ones personal opinion. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Regardless of how it got their....HIV is now well established in the "straight" heterosexual sections of society.
To pretend otherwise is the absolute height of ignorance and naivety....something the OP seems to score incredibly high with....unbelievable....or perhaps just homophobic? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Finally we have a high-level admission that there is no threat of a global Aids pandemic among heterosexuals. After 25 years of official scaremongering about western societies being ravaged by the disease – with salacious, tombstone-illustrated government propaganda warning people to wear a condom or "die of ignorance" – the head of the World Health Organisation's HIV/Aids department says there is no need for heterosexuals to fret.
Kevin de Cock, who has headed the global battle against Aids, said at the weekend that, outside very poor African countries, Aids is confined to "high-risk groups", including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers. And even in these communities it remains quite rare. "It is very unlikely there will be a heterosexual epidemic in countries [outside sub-Saharan Africa]", he said. In other words? All that hysterical fearmongering about Aids spreading among sexed-up western youth was a pack of lies........"
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/jun/12/aids.health
I could go on but I will leave all you tabloid readers with that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Finally we have a high-level admission that there is no threat of a global Aids pandemic among heterosexuals. After 25 years of official scaremongering about western societies being ravaged by the disease – with salacious, tombstone-illustrated government propaganda warning people to wear a condom or "die of ignorance" – the head of the World Health Organisation's HIV/Aids department says there is no need for heterosexuals to fret.
Kevin de Cock, who has headed the global battle against Aids, said at the weekend that, outside very poor African countries, Aids is confined to "high-risk groups", including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers. And even in these communities it remains quite rare. "It is very unlikely there will be a heterosexual epidemic in countries [outside sub-Saharan Africa]", he said. In other words? All that hysterical fearmongering about Aids spreading among sexed-up western youth was a pack of lies........"
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/jun/12/aids.health
I could go on but I will leave all you tabloid readers with that"
As long as that one guy says so it must be true then |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Lol. Thought you were trying to be clever somehow, but you are simply beyond ignorant. That has to be one of the most idiotic statements ever. You couldn't be more wrong.....factually.
Yep you nailed it with that rely. Name calling always makes a good point that's hard to refute."
Its hardly name calling. He's just stating a fact. Your post shows you are ignorant and have very misguided and potentially dangerous ideas about STI and what's worrying is that you can't accept you are wrong and correct your thinking. You talk about logic but you seem you have no understanding of what it means or how to use it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
As long as that one guy says so it must be true then
You did actually read the link with the other 3 or 4 experts echoing the same point right?"
The 'article' is 6 years old.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Its hardly name calling. He's just stating a fact. Your post shows you are ignorant and have very misguided and potentially dangerous ideas about STI and what's worrying is that you can't accept you are wrong and correct your thinking. You talk about logic but you seem you have no understanding of what it means or how to use it. "
Er...I think you should read the rest of the thread. My point is well and truly hammered home now. The difference I provided citations that actually gave my point credence, the others didn't and just parroted "omg that's so ignorant"
Just doing you guys a favour. It really was like being in a "no the world IS flat argument" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
As long as that one guy says so it must be true then
You did actually read the link with the other 3 or 4 experts echoing the same point right?"
Ok I read it. What's the point you are trying to make? Holding my hand up and saying I'm not sure I understand. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
As long as that one guy says so it must be true then
You did actually read the link with the other 3 or 4 experts echoing the same point right?
The 'article' is 6 years old. "
Wow this really is like some sort of religious service I interrupted with some logical thought and a little bit of science |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Finally we have a high-level admission that there is no threat of a global Aids pandemic among heterosexuals. After 25 years of official scaremongering about western societies being ravaged by the disease – with salacious, tombstone-illustrated government propaganda warning people to wear a condom or "die of ignorance" – the head of the World Health Organisation's HIV/Aids department says there is no need for heterosexuals to fret.
Kevin de Cock, who has headed the global battle against Aids, said at the weekend that, outside very poor African countries, Aids is confined to "high-risk groups", including men who have sex with men, injecting drug users, and sex workers. And even in these communities it remains quite rare. "It is very unlikely there will be a heterosexual epidemic in countries [outside sub-Saharan Africa]", he said. In other words? All that hysterical fearmongering about Aids spreading among sexed-up western youth was a pack of lies........"
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/jun/12/aids.health
I could go on but I will leave all you tabloid readers with that"
Just because there isn;t goiung to be a pandemic (well at least not in the developed world) doesn't mean there isn't a risk
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Aids/HIV aside are you even aware of the long term affects of 'just' chlamydia and the like? "
Yes that's if you don't get it treated soon enough. That's why you should get tested often. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Omg... That is worrying!! What about if you are a woman who sleeps with a HIV positive guy? She's not any of those things.
In fact here's some statistics for you..
In 2013, 4,477 men and 1,522 women were newly diagnosed with HIV. 75% of people newly diagnosed with HIV in 2013 were men. The majority (66%) acquired HIV through sex with men, followed by heterosexual sex. Around a quarter of newly diagnosed people in 2013 were women, almost all of whom acquired HIV through heterosexual sex. - See more at: http://www.nat.org.uk/HIV-Facts/Statistics/Latest-UK-statistics/HIV-Diagnoses.aspx#.dpuf
Lol
Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids."
How is it less difficult for a heterosexual to get aids? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Its hardly name calling. He's just stating a fact. Your post shows you are ignorant and have very misguided and potentially dangerous ideas about STI and what's worrying is that you can't accept you are wrong and correct your thinking. You talk about logic but you seem you have no understanding of what it means or how to use it.
Er...I think you should read the rest of the thread. My point is well and truly hammered home now. The difference I provided citations that actually gave my point credence, the others didn't and just parroted "omg that's so ignorant"
Just doing you guys a favour. It really was like being in a "no the world IS flat argument" "
I did read all of it but it seems you didn't and are just making up some shit as you go along which doesn't make any sense. There is a small risk to catching HIV but there is still a risk whoever you fuck as they could have fucked anyone. Its that simple. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I love these threads. Such entertaining flights of delusion.
lots of people like that on fab swingers."
Yeah, does give some entertainment for a bit though. Now and then. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"Is people naive or gullible regard fucking FuckBuddy bareback. No matter how constant both of you go for screening in your local Gum clinic.the only person you can trust is your partner that live under the same roof with you.
Not someone living 50 miles away from you.
I know everything on the swing scene involved risk. But how can you trust someone who doesn't live with you.? All in the name of FuckBuddy.
for some couple they wont meet up with FuckBuddy couple due to some obvious reasons. "
I think people could say you are as naive as the people you seem to be questioning for putting a mileage premise on your question |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's becoming increasingly common for people to catch HIV when having sex abroad. But no one on here does that do they?!
Why is everyone so obsessed with HIV anyway? Even less 'serious' STIs can have complications and herpes will be with you for life.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
As long as that one guy says so it must be true then
You did actually read the link with the other 3 or 4 experts echoing the same point right?
Ok I read it. What's the point you are trying to make? Holding my hand up and saying I'm not sure I understand. "
Ah no point... got it.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
Wow. A quite staggering level of ignorance. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is people naive or gullible regard fucking FuckBuddy bareback. No matter how constant both of you go for screening in your local Gum clinic.the only person you can trust is your partner that live under the same roof with you.
Not someone living 50 miles away from you.
I know everything on the swing scene involved risk. But how can you trust someone who doesn't live with you.? All in the name of FuckBuddy.
for some couple they wont meet up with FuckBuddy couple due to some obvious reasons.
I think people could say you are as naive as the people you seem to be questioning for putting a mileage premise on your question "
Naive in what sense?I ve come across fuckbuddy that live far apart. I don't know your argument. Be more explicit
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
After reading this thread Im banging my head in despair. Just because the risk is minimal doesn't mean there is no risk and actually though there might never be a pandemic according to recent research hiv & aids amongst heterosexual people is on the rise here in the UK.
Im honest about my sexuality but judging from the messages we get a lot if people on here aren't. Just think if everyone was bare-backing how easily something could spread. It just takes one idiot who thinks their safe to help spread it around |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"After reading this thread Im banging my head in despair. Just because the risk is minimal doesn't mean there is no risk and actually though there might never be a pandemic according to recent research hiv & aids amongst heterosexuals"
I see this getting purported a lot by the homosexual lobbyists but they never ever provide detail. What are the raw numbers and who exactly are those spreading it and at risk? Again the devil is in the detail the Daily Mail leave out:
"The researchers fear that, as the number of heterosexuals living with HIV in the UK grows, "the likelihood of heterosexual transmission within the country will increase, particularly among ethnic minorities."
A spokeswoman for the Terrence Higgins Trust said: "This research confirms that although gay men are at the greatest risk of HIV infection, the risks for the heterosexual community are steadily growing, especially for the African community living in the UK."
My point always was from post one on here that you are at a small risk if you are not having sex with a high risk group. Trying to pretend that every group is equally at high risk (to avoid hurting a high risk groups feelings) is not only disingenuous its down right dangerous. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
And another quote on the rise in heterosexual infections in the UK
"A spokesman for the HPA said the UK heterosexual cases were concentrated in the African community, and most were infected by partners infected abroad. "They are quite small numbers and although they were acquired in the UK they are linked with people who have travelled," he said." |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And another quote on the rise in heterosexual infections in the UK
"A spokesman for the HPA said the UK heterosexual cases were concentrated in the African community, and most were infected by partners infected abroad. "They are quite small numbers and although they were acquired in the UK they are linked with people who have travelled," he said.""
you'll have to show the source of that quote. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"After reading this thread Im banging my head in despair. Just because the risk is minimal doesn't mean there is no risk and actually though there might never be a pandemic according to recent research hiv & aids amongst heterosexuals
I see this getting purported a lot by the homosexual lobbyists but they never ever provide detail. What are the raw numbers and who exactly are those spreading it and at risk? Again the devil is in the detail the Daily Mail leave out:
"The researchers fear that, as the number of heterosexuals living with HIV in the UK grows, "the likelihood of heterosexual transmission within the country will increase, particularly among ethnic minorities."
A spokeswoman for the Terrence Higgins Trust said: "This research confirms that although gay men are at the greatest risk of HIV infection, the risks for the heterosexual community are steadily growing, especially for the African community living in the UK."
My point always was from post one on here that you are at a small risk if you are not having sex with a high risk group. Trying to pretend that every group is equally at high risk (to avoid hurting a high risk groups feelings) is not only disingenuous its down right dangerous. "
Good intelligent post! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And another quote on the rise in heterosexual infections in the UK
"A spokesman for the HPA said the UK heterosexual cases were concentrated in the African community, and most were infected by partners infected abroad. "They are quite small numbers and although they were acquired in the UK they are linked with people who have travelled," he said."
you'll have to show the source of that quote."
No problem
http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/sharp-rise-in-heterosexual-hiv-cases-1035161.html |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
I'll have whatever he's drinking. Total nonce. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
I'll have whatever he's drinking. Total nonce."
You really really should read the whole read thread before posting. Would have saved you the embarrassment of making your post. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Jackson I don't know if you are one who plays it safe or not because though says so on your profile we've got used to some people not being who they say they are on here.
Considering your original post seems strange that you messaged us recently although it was about having sex with just ginger she has regular sex with a "high risk" group i.e me being a bi-sexual male. Even with condoms there would still be a risk of catching something if we had anything so in fact only safe sex is no sex. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Woohoooo!! I'm chucking all my condoms down the toilet. Only gay and bisexual men get sti's.
I'm immune!! "
It's low risk!
We're having a bareback gangbangggg
We're having a ballllll
Yippeeeeeee |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
Oh dear oh dear .. HIV isn't just In these minorities. It affects even the straight/clean /non users of society. . Quite gobsmacked to hear this. Also the window period is 3 months until it can be detected whether you're straight/gay and whoever else you quoted. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
I'll have whatever he's drinking. Total nonce."
I don't agree with what he's saying but not sure that knuckle dragging insults approach is the way forward. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Oh dear oh dear .. HIV isn't just In these minorities. It affects even the straight/clean /non users of society. . Quite gobsmacked to hear this. Also the window period is 3 months until it can be detected whether you're straight/gay and whoever else you quoted. "
Read the whole thread before posting please. Thanks |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
Oh dear oh dear .. HIV isn't just In these minorities. It affects even the straight/clean /non users of society. . Quite gobsmacked to hear this. Also the window period is 3 months until it can be detected whether you're straight/gay and whoever else you quoted.
Read the whole thread before posting please. Thanks "
Thing is most people start at the beginning of threads funnily enough, and stop and comment as they go. Some will read to the end and comment: pointless telling people to read to the end then comment! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"it's all about viral loading, so having another infection won't help you I'm afraid."
I read it on t'internet. If you jump up and down you don't get preggers either. No sprog, no Aids. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Speaking as some what of an expert, he's right, most of you are wrong, and you should wear a condom. Oh and distance has nothing to do with trust. Nuff said! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"it's all about viral loading, so having another infection won't help you I'm afraid.
I read it on t'internet. If you jump up and down you don't get preggers either. No sprog, no Aids. "
It's stuff like that that gets babies raped in Africa... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Thing is most people start at the beginning of threads funnily enough, and stop and comment as they go......"
Given the nature of threads you should be able to figure out why that is not an effective response strategy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Thing is most people start at the beginning of threads funnily enough, and stop and comment as they go......
Given the nature of threads you should be able to figure out why that is not an effective response strategy."
Effective or not, it's the way it is. Some will read to the end and jump on whatever bandwagon is rolling along: not effective either still pointless telling people not to. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
"
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous."
Honey. I am neither dishonest or dangerous.
Nor do I need your preachin' an a screachin' in my ears.
So shush a little more, talk a little less and listen. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous."
Yes its not rocket science is it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
Honey. I am neither dishonest or dangerous.
Nor do I need your preachin' an a screachin' in my ears.
So shush a little more, talk a little less and listen."
Just fixing up your road analogy love. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
Honey. I am neither dishonest or dangerous.
Nor do I need your preachin' an a screachin' in my ears.
So shush a little more, talk a little less and listen.
Just fixing up your road analogy love. "
Didn't need fixing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous."
Absolutely ridiculous!!!! You seriously think that some groups of people are less risky? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous.
Absolutely ridiculous!!!! You seriously think that some groups of people are less risky? "
Vicars are less risky than rent boys. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous.
Absolutely ridiculous!!!! You seriously think that some groups of people are less risky?
Vicars are less risky than rent boys."
Surely they are in the same group. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous.
Absolutely ridiculous!!!! You seriously think that some groups of people are less risky? "
If you would read over the sources I have linked and take off your idiotic blinkers then yes you might just find some groups of people are at higher risk of catching and consequently spreading hiv and aids.
sorry if this crashes your egalitarian love party.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous.
Absolutely ridiculous!!!! You seriously think that some groups of people are less risky?
If you would read over the sources I have linked and take off your idiotic blinkers then yes you might just find some groups of people are at higher risk of catching and consequently spreading hiv and aids.
sorry if this crashes your egalitarian love party.
"
Yes it seems pretty obvious to me.
Some people only believe what they want to believe don't they. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous.
Absolutely ridiculous!!!! You seriously think that some groups of people are less risky?
Vicars are less risky than rent boys.
Surely they are in the same group. "
Lol, I'll stack 'em up you knock 'em down! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *adgodCouple
over a year ago
Greensburg |
Heterosexuals who do not sleep with at risk groups get HIV. That is the only fact you need to worry about. Regardless of how many times you stomp your foot on the floor, it happens. From heterosexual sex to blood transfusions, it certainly happens, and is certainly documented. You first said those folks really didn't have to worry about it, but are now trying to justify your ridiculous statement by assigning levels of risk. You are slowly distancing yourself from the extreme nature of your first statement and focusing on the obvious. High risk groups are more at risk than lower risk groups? Fuck, that's brilliant! I could have never put that together on my own. Well played! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Heterosexuals who do not sleep with at risk groups get HIV. That is the only fact you need to worry about. Regardless of how many times you stomp your foot on the floor, it happens. From heterosexual sex to blood transfusions, it certainly happens, and is certainly documented. You first said those folks really didn't have to worry about it, but are now trying to justify your ridiculous statement by assigning levels of risk. You are slowly distancing yourself from the extreme nature of your first statement and focusing on the obvious. High risk groups are more at risk than lower risk groups? Fuck, that's brilliant! I could have never put that together on my own. Well played! "
No, you are another one of those mendacious posters on here that uses the slippery lawyer tactics. Not working here pal. Let me copy paste AGAIN my first post:
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like."
As you can quite clearly see in that first post i was delineating higher risk groups. Nice try pal. I suppose you made that little mealy mouthed post to curry favour with the other reality deniers on here.
Really, this is like "debating" evolution on a creationist forum. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Heterosexuals who do not sleep with at risk groups get HIV. That is the only fact you need to worry about. Regardless of how many times you stomp your foot on the floor, it happens. From heterosexual sex to blood transfusions, it certainly happens, and is certainly documented. You first said those folks really didn't have to worry about it, but are now trying to justify your ridiculous statement by assigning levels of risk. You are slowly distancing yourself from the extreme nature of your first statement and focusing on the obvious. High risk groups are more at risk than lower risk groups? Fuck, that's brilliant! I could have never put that together on my own. Well played!
No, you are another one of those mendacious posters on here that uses the slippery lawyer tactics. Not working here pal. Let me copy paste AGAIN my first post:
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like."
As you can quite clearly see in that first post i was delineating higher risk groups. Nice try pal. I suppose you made that little mealy mouthed post to curry favour with the other reality deniers on here.
Really, this is like "debating" evolution on a creationist forum."
Why on earth are you doing it then ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ust2guysCouple (MM)
over a year ago
South Yorks |
And someone with these bigoted _iews is allowed on this site? People with such _iews is a menace to the swinging fraternity and the ones most likely to spread infections - of any sort.
To the post pest, sir you are an irritant |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"And someone with these bigoted _iews is allowed on this site? People with such _iews is a menace to the swinging fraternity and the ones most likely to spread infections - of any sort.
To the post pest, sir you are an irritant"
That's unfair and probably untrue. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And someone with these bigoted _iews is allowed on this site? People with such _iews is a menace to the swinging fraternity and the ones most likely to spread infections - of any sort.
To the post pest, sir you are an irritant"
You see here is the crux of the issue. The posters on here are trying to shout down anyone commenting on a fact that does not align with an incredibly misleading and dangerous pc party line. You are now using "bigot" to get your way. If you really cared about preventing infections you would admit what I am posting is true but no, you advocate for your group. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Heterosexuals who do not sleep with at risk groups get HIV. That is the only fact you need to worry about. Regardless of how many times you stomp your foot on the floor, it happens. From heterosexual sex to blood transfusions, it certainly happens, and is certainly documented. You first said those folks really didn't have to worry about it, but are now trying to justify your ridiculous statement by assigning levels of risk. You are slowly distancing yourself from the extreme nature of your first statement and focusing on the obvious. High risk groups are more at risk than lower risk groups? Fuck, that's brilliant! I could have never put that together on my own. Well played!
No, you are another one of those mendacious posters on here that uses the slippery lawyer tactics. Not working here pal. Let me copy paste AGAIN my first post:
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like."
As you can quite clearly see in that first post i was delineating higher risk groups. Nice try pal. I suppose you made that little mealy mouthed post to curry favour with the other reality deniers on here.
Really, this is like "debating" evolution on a creationist forum."
How does "worst thing you will get... Chlamydia" equate in your head to "low risk of HIV" ?
You quite clearly make an absolutist statement about HIV or are you just claiming that you're much more likely to get chlamydia than you are HIV if you only have sex with heterosexual people? Which would be the same with any of the other groups you mentioned to by the way, so still shows your original statement to be false or at least misleading. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Regardless of how it got their....HIV is now well established in the "straight" heterosexual sections of society.
To pretend otherwise is the absolute height of ignorance and naivety....something the OP seems to score incredibly high with....unbelievable....or perhaps just homophobic?"
Please don't twist the original thread. I never mentioned anything about (gay or straight people). The issue I try to point out is the trust between two person living far apart as fuck buddy.
To suggest that I am a homophobic because of my thread is utterly ridiculous |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
From the wording of your first post it makes out that only homosexuals, bisexuals and drug users get HIV and that's the point people have taken umbrage at. Still you stand by this statement even though the proof you've cited states that HIV is past by heterosexual couples as well. Your counter argument is well they must have caught it from the gays or drug users. Not only does it come across as naive but also homophobic which I'm hoping wasn't your intention.
The point people have been trying to get across to is the low risk is still some risk. No one knows who the last person someone slept with from this (or any other site) was and what they were upto during that meet so the best way to protect yourself and others is to play safe in much the same way you put a seatbelt on before you drive off. You might never crash and need it on but won't you be glad when it saves your life??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Regardless of how it got their....HIV is now well established in the "straight" heterosexual sections of society.
To pretend otherwise is the absolute height of ignorance and naivety....something the OP seems to score incredibly high with....unbelievable....or perhaps just homophobic?
Please don't twist the original thread. I never mentioned anything about (gay or straight people). The issue I try to point out is the trust between two person living far apart as fuck buddy.
To suggest that I am a homophobic because of my thread is utterly ridiculous"
They don't mean you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"And someone with these bigoted _iews is allowed on this site? People with such _iews is a menace to the swinging fraternity and the ones most likely to spread infections - of any sort.
To the post pest, sir you are an irritant
You see here is the crux of the issue. The posters on here are trying to shout down anyone commenting on a fact that does not align with an incredibly misleading and dangerous pc party line. You are now using "bigot" to get your way. If you really cared about preventing infections you would admit what I am posting is true but no, you advocate for your group."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Seems to me there is some goal post shifting going on here now by opponents of my position. I quite clearly elucidated my point in post two when I said
"Yes heterosexual sex following having sex with an injecting drug user or someone having sex with homosexuals.
It's incredibly difficult for heterosexuals to get aids."
I sense some straw man building here.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" Still you stand by this statement even though the proof you've cited states that HIV is past by heterosexual couples as well. Your counter argument is well they must have caught it from the gays or drug users. Not only does it come across as naive but also homophobic"
That is 100% my point. Ultimately 90% (i will keep the percentage low to pacify you a little) of the infection that enters the heterosexual community did not originate there.
Using a smear word like homophobic isn't going to change that fact. Sorry, the truth does indeed hurt sometimes.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
I read it on t'internet. If you jump up and down you don't get preggers either. No sprog, no Aids. "
Ooo we also heard that if your computer gets a virus you'll be immune from everything forever |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" Still you stand by this statement even though the proof you've cited states that HIV is past by heterosexual couples as well. Your counter argument is well they must have caught it from the gays or drug users. Not only does it come across as naive but also homophobic
That is 100% my point. Ultimately 90% (i will keep the percentage low to pacify you a little) of the infection that enters the heterosexual community did not originate there.
Using a smear word like homophobic isn't going to change that fact. Sorry, the truth does indeed hurt sometimes.
"
I have absolutely no idea what your point is. I did ask you to clarify earlier in the thread but you didn't. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Whoever or whatever the risk is or who is most at risk surely finding a way to reduce the risk to yourself is key.
Not everyone who runs across the motorway will be hit by a car but to reduce the risk to myself I won't run across the motorway. My decision my choice.
Either way I as wouldn't base the management of my sexual health on a forum thread, newspaper articles or heresay. I would base it on sound medical advice from a trained professional.
The point is that certain groups can be proven to be "motorways" while others are B roads. To pretend that's not the case is dishonest and dangerous.
Absolutely ridiculous!!!! You seriously think that some groups of people are less risky?
Vicars are less risky than rent boys.
Surely they are in the same group.
Lol, I'll stack 'em up you knock 'em down!"
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
I have absolutely no idea what your point is. I did ask you to clarify earlier in the thread but you didn't."
Yes I know. When someone on the internet makes a post that is completely contrary to another person's point of _iew they often find it confusing, unclear and demand unlimited amount of sources which they will them deem unreliable, biased and out of date. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
I have absolutely no idea what your point is. I did ask you to clarify earlier in the thread but you didn't.
Yes I know. When someone on the internet makes a post that is completely contrary to another person's point of _iew they often find it confusing, unclear and demand unlimited amount of sources which they will them deem unreliable, biased and out of date. "
Yes I had noticed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
I have absolutely no idea what your point is. I did ask you to clarify earlier in the thread but you didn't.
Yes I know. When someone on the internet makes a post that is completely contrary to another person's point of _iew they often find it confusing, unclear and demand unlimited amount of sources which they will them deem unreliable, biased and out of date. "
So you don't know what your point was? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
There's not point arguing with stupid people that don't realise just how stupid they are.
Or maybe they do realise but are unwilling to back down and admit they are wrong so keep arguing there incorrect point.
Either you just go around in circles so just let them get on with it. Least you can use the block button.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *osieWoman
over a year ago
Wembley |
" Still you stand by this statement even though the proof you've cited states that HIV is past by heterosexual couples as well. Your counter argument is well they must have caught it from the gays or drug users. Not only does it come across as naive but also homophobic
That is 100% my point. Ultimately 90% (i will keep the percentage low to pacify you a little) of the infection that enters the heterosexual community did not originate there.
Using a smear word like homophobic isn't going to change that fact. Sorry, the truth does indeed hurt sometimes.
"
90% of the straight guys and straight couples are having sex with the gays?
How does that one work? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble."
thats dumb..and how would you know.. most bi guys are here pretending to be straight.. so theyre fucking the women your hoping to fuck . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"To be completely honest worst thing you will get if you are not sleeping with homosexuals, bisexual males or injecting drug users is chlamydia or the like. Not pleasant but not aids. I think that's why some will take the gamble.
thats dumb..and how would you know.. most bi guys are here pretending to be straight.. so theyre fucking the women your hoping to fuck . "
'hoping to' |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Genuine FuckBuddy, (No Strings Fun)
100% Discreet Slim smooth body, Lots of stamina, Enjoys pleasing the ladies, Willing to travel for the right kind of women, please see my profile for more details |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ames6ft5Man
over a year ago
North London / Herts |
"Genuine FuckBuddy, (No Strings Fun)
100% Discreet Slim smooth body, Lots of stamina, Enjoys pleasing the ladies, Willing to travel for the right kind of women, please see my profile for more details "
Oh my. I'll have to assume you didn't read this thread before posting your "come get me post" here.
The irony of your photos currently including unprotected penetrative sex is something else!!!
Hint: if you read the thread it's not really about FuckBuddies.
Not wanting to get into the rights or wrongs of bareback (that's covered weekly by its own threads)... But for an example of poor context web advertising this is a new case study. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
