FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > update

update

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Is it just me (Te) or don't you think maybe on your profile some photos should at least be 12mths old, came across a profile with the only pics it had were dated 2008

I know not everyone changes much in that time but it wouldn't hurt to add a more recent public photo every now and then

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Tend not to worry about what pictures people put on. Everyone we've met has looked much better in person anyway.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

With that theory they could re add old photo hacing u believe its recent lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

2008 could be a fair bit different for some people, but can't say I've worried about it.

Pics sent privately don't show dates, so I guess it's always a danger that they're very old, but never had any bad results with it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"With that theory they could re add old photo hacing u believe its recent lol"

This!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

we prefer the old photos to have the original date on as its not as much of a shock if you know the pic was taken a few years back - we still have a couple of our original pics but do throw in the occasional update - not that we have changed that much

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Yeh all true just I guess just thought ppl might of added at list one recent public pic with in last 12 months

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0469

0