FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Was probably a guy.......

Was probably a guy.......

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Why is it that any dodgy post/meet request/no pic /no show etc always meets on here with 'she/they were probably a guy' followed by mass agreement? Baaaaaaaa!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rightonsteveMan  over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Because it usually men who do these sorts of things.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Because it usually men who do these sorts of things."

And you base that on what?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rightonsteveMan  over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!


"Because it usually men who do these sorts of things.

And you base that on what? "

Osmosis.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Because it usually men who do these sorts of things.

And you base that on what?

Osmosis. "

Good one lol!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ensualtouch15Man  over a year ago

ashby de la zouch

Actually I do think wives and girlfriends are responsible for some of the crimes that some threads might near unanimously metaphorically finger the poor single male x I also might mention malevolent teenage girls x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Issues we've had have mainly been with couples ! Only 1 guy x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Issues we've had have mainly been with couples ! Only 1 guy x"

Think the point being made is that people then assume the "couple" we're fake....and in fact were just a guy?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0