FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > A Fab Ban on Bareback Meets?

A Fab Ban on Bareback Meets?

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Dear All,

On my day-off, I watched 'This Morning' [ITV] & what got me was an inter_iew with...

Rachel Dilley (aged 58).

The Inter_iew was about how at aged 48, Ms. Dilley got HIV via unprotected Sex.

She believed that only Black Africans could get this tragic disease hence her going bareback with a man she had just met

You can watch her worrying but also brave inter_iew via YouTube, am sure a search of...

Rachel Dilley This Morning March 2014 HIV

Will get you their also, a number of articles have been made about the actual inter_iew.

Now on to Fab...

I've noticed in the past 12mths, month on month an increase in Unprotected Sex Meets or Bareback.

The majority are Gangbang variety in which Male Participants are requested to ejaculate inside one Woman...

This is highly dangerous behaviour & in light of what I've watched on Daytime Television; the impacts last for a life-time.

Therefore, I would like the owners of Fab... this Website to now ban the open promotion of Bareback meets.

Also, if meets arranged via this site suddenly become Bareback at the actual meet then those arranging it should be banned.

What do you think reader, agree or disagree but please search YouTube for Ms. Dilley's story in her own words.

Better safe than sorry.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iewMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Angus & Findhorn

I watched it and I was staggered.

a ban: NO.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *issHottieBottieWoman over a year ago

Kent

I think that if consenting adults want to take that risk then it's up to them.

I think that it would be impossible to police on fabs anyway!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Oh please get real. How can fab ban that... ?

It's up to individuals and some of us are well aware of the risks.. also I'd say that a lot of people will claim safe sex but not actually practice it.

And do you want to extend that to those that have risky sexual preferences too...?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Why just not take away all our human rights and be done with it!!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *uby0000Woman over a year ago

hertfordshire

its down to the people concerned if they want to bareback not down to the site I myself wouldn't risk it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Its just an personal _iew not as an whole

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Dear All,

On my day-off, I watched 'This Morning' [ITV] & what got me was an inter_iew with...

Rachel Dilley (aged 58).

The Inter_iew was about how at aged 48, Ms. Dilley got HIV via unprotected Sex.

She believed that only Black Africans could get this tragic disease hence her going bareback with a man she had just met

You can watch her worrying but also brave inter_iew via YouTube, am sure a search of...

Rachel Dilley This Morning March 2014 HIV

Will get you their also, a number of articles have been made about the actual inter_iew.

Now on to Fab...

I've noticed in the past 12mths, month on month an increase in Unprotected Sex Meets or Bareback.

The majority are Gangbang variety in which Male Participants are requested to ejaculate inside one Woman...

This is highly dangerous behaviour & in light of what I've watched on Daytime Television; the impacts last for a life-time.

Therefore, I would like the owners of Fab... this Website to now ban the open promotion of Bareback meets.

Also, if meets arranged via this site suddenly become Bareback at the actual meet then those arranging it should be banned.

What do you think reader, agree or disagree but please search YouTube for Ms. Dilley's story in her own words.

Better safe than sorry."

Yeah, let's all do what you want.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *issHottieBottieWoman over a year ago

Kent

And If you want to ban anyone going bare do you want to ban anyone that doesn't use condoms for oral as well?? There's still a risk for that albeit much less risk!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *issHottieBottieWoman over a year ago

Kent

"Why just not take away all our human rights and be done with it!!!!"

I'll take away yours... Gimp suit and locked in my basement...sex slave!!! Mwa-ha-ha!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

you can't enforce safe sex especially just for NSA sex, i've met plenty of people who love bareback, but i always check and double check if they are safe, i'll always be honest with someone about my sexual health, lying bastards are the real problem.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

ban all who want unsafe sex

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

how do you know if they got aids as only a blood test can tell you that no smell no rash

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"ban all who want unsafe sex"

So does thay include greedy girls and those that do oral without?

And there is No such thing as safe sex

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

No, it's just this site donates money to World's AIDS Day, each 1st December.

They have a banner celebrating this when you log-in.

Therefore, if they do this with the Red Ribbon then why simply make this site 100% Safe Sex.

Do you not see, that people arranging via the Meets, Events section for a Woman to have as many as 20 Men cumming in her isn't reckless behaviour....!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/03/14 18:33:24]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

OP... You don't have safe sex as an interest and you say you want to deliver yummy spunk to women and couples. Is that delivering it inside a condom?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

A bukkake is risky yet greater risk is a Man spunking in a Woman unprotected.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Dear All,

On my day-off, I watched 'This Morning' [ITV] & what got me was an inter_iew with...

Rachel Dilley (aged 58).

The Inter_iew was about how at aged 48, Ms. Dilley got HIV via unprotected Sex.

She believed that only Black Africans could get this tragic disease hence her going bareback with a man she had just met

You can watch her worrying but also brave inter_iew via YouTube, am sure a search of...

Rachel Dilley This Morning March 2014 HIV

Will get you their also, a number of articles have been made about the actual inter_iew.

Now on to Fab...

I've noticed in the past 12mths, month on month an increase in Unprotected Sex Meets or Bareback.

The majority are Gangbang variety in which Male Participants are requested to ejaculate inside one Woman...

This is highly dangerous behaviour & in light of what I've watched on Daytime Television; the impacts last for a life-time.

Therefore, I would like the owners of Fab... this Website to now ban the open promotion of Bareback meets.

Also, if meets arranged via this site suddenly become Bareback at the actual meet then those arranging it should be banned.

What do you think reader, agree or disagree but please search YouTube for Ms. Dilley's story in her own words.

Better safe than sorry."

O my god I just watched a man cross the road and he got hit by a car !!!

Fab i think you should ban all meets that may lead to you having to cross the road !! And if you go to meet someone and that person hasn't made a parking space on there side of the road avalable you should contact fabs and that person will get band .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No, it's just this site donates money to World's AIDS Day, each 1st December.

They have a banner celebrating this when you log-in.

Therefore, if they do this with the Red Ribbon then why simply make this site 100% Safe Sex.

Do you not see, that people arranging via the Meets, Events section for a Woman to have as many as 20 Men cumming in her isn't reckless behaviour....!!! "
it's there choice though and I'm sure people think having multiple partners full stop is reckless

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *uby0000Woman over a year ago

hertfordshire

"how do you know if they got aids as only a blood test can tell you that no smell no rash"

you don't that's the point and if they are sleeping with everyone that asks they would need to be tested constantly

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"OP... You don't have safe sex as an interest and you say you want to deliver yummy spunk to women and couples. Is that delivering it inside a condom?"

Maybe, after seeing Rachel Dilley on 'This Morning' I've been reflecting on my own behaviour.

You are correct, yet the power of that inter_iew has made me think deeply.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"A bukkake is risky yet greater risk is a Man spunking in a Woman unprotected."

You know it's easier to catch something from the eyes than through inside ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

I think that, as (allegedly) grown adults, its up to us to monitor our own sexual behaviour and how we choose to enjoy ourselves on here. Its not the sites responsibility in any way - Fab facilitates meets, not arranges them.

I've just had the strangest sense of deja vu. Has someone posted something like this before?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *issHottieBottieWoman over a year ago

Kent

"A bukkake is risky yet greater risk is a Man spunking in a Woman unprotected."

So your risky behaviour is ok.

But everyone else should stop theirs.

Ok then

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I'm sorry but only a moron or an idiot would do bareback with a stranger, it's just so obvious to me and, let's face it.......Is there a REAL physical difference or, is it just the psycological knowledge of knowing you're "taking the ultimate risk...."?

Think about it.....is it REALLY worth it for a few minutes (if not seconds) of complete stupidity?????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

its risky i agree been hearing about it for ages now its nothing new.

it doesnt seem to bother a lot of people on here, not sure why, also men on other sites too.

they cant realy ban it because its up to people if they want to take the risk.

same as other things that are risky.

its always at the back of my mind thats why i get tested as often as possible.

maybe they should have the aids awareness ads on telly again.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *bi HaiveMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

Or just let all us adults look after our own safety regardless of what others choose to do!

An impractical and unrealistic suggestion and it's not the sites responsibility to decide how people act.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Dear All,

On my day-off, I watched 'This Morning' [ITV] & what got me was an inter_iew with...

Rachel Dilley (aged 58).

The Inter_iew was about how at aged 48, Ms. Dilley got HIV via unprotected Sex.

She believed that only Black Africans could get this tragic disease hence her going bareback with a man she had just met

You can watch her worrying but also brave inter_iew via YouTube, am sure a search of...

Rachel Dilley This Morning March 2014 HIV

Will get you their also, a number of articles have been made about the actual inter_iew.

Now on to Fab...

I've noticed in the past 12mths, month on month an increase in Unprotected Sex Meets or Bareback.

The majority are Gangbang variety in which Male Participants are requested to ejaculate inside one Woman...

This is highly dangerous behaviour & in light of what I've watched on Daytime Television; the impacts last for a life-time.

Therefore, I would like the owners of Fab... this Website to now ban the open promotion of Bareback meets.

Also, if meets arranged via this site suddenly become Bareback at the actual meet then those arranging it should be banned.

What do you think reader, agree or disagree but please search YouTube for Ms. Dilley's story in her own words.

Better safe than sorry.

O my god I just watched a man cross the road and he got hit by a car !!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *londeCazWoman over a year ago

Arse End of the Universe, Cumbria

"you can't enforce safe sex especially just for NSA sex, i've met plenty of people who love bareback, but i always check and double check if they are safe, i'll always be honest with someone about my sexual health, lying bastards are the real problem."

Can you explain how you check and double check please? The only "proof" I have is a text from the clap clinic which confirms I was clear on dd/mm/yyyy approx 2 weeks after my tests...I guess I could fake this quite easily, I also could be regularly tested but play BB all the time and just be lucky, or I could be harbouring a nasty bug having had sex a coupla days after my tests (condoms are safer, not bullet proof)

I'll never condemn anyone for choosing BB, but I do think it's a bit naive to think you can ever know that person you fuck is disease free

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Also, the hit by a Car connection isn't clever or adding anything to this argument.

Allow me...

Is, it right for people on this site one that donates money to a charity that promote Safe Sex to place adverts for Unprotected Sex.

Now, this can't be stopped yet surely if a ban was placed on Bareback Meets especially Gangbangs (think about that), it would be responsible behaviour.

Time for a change, me thinks.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iewMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Angus & Findhorn

[Removed by poster at 13/03/14 18:41:14]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I don't agree with a ban for too many reasons to write about as im eating my dinner

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iewMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Angus & Findhorn

I asked the site to show the red ribbon and it is something I applaud the owners for doing.

It ends there, it is then down to personal choice, the same as it is outside of the site.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Also, the hit by a Car connection isn't clever or adding anything to this argument.

Allow me...

Is, it right for people on this site one that donates money to a charity that promote Safe Sex to place adverts for Unprotected Sex.

Now, this can't be stopped yet surely if a ban was placed on Bareback Meets especially Gangbangs (think about that), it would be responsible behaviour.

Time for a change, me thinks. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *issHottieBottieWoman over a year ago

Kent

"Also, the hit by a Car connection isn't clever or adding anything to this argument.

Allow me...

Is, it right for people on this site one that donates money to a charity that promote Safe Sex to place adverts for Unprotected Sex.

Now, this can't be stopped yet surely if a ban was placed on Bareback Meets especially Gangbangs (think about that), it would be responsible behaviour.

Time for a change, me thinks. "

Fabs cannot possibly check every meet/party/forum post/pm.

People could easily advertise a meet then pm people who show interest saying it's bare. How would fabs know?? Pics can't be policed as who's to say the bare pics aren't with a partner etc???

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Someone has probably said what I possibly would have anyway,I havn't read all the posts

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *iamondsmiles.Woman over a year ago

little house on the praire

I watched the inter_iew and was gobsmacked by her ignorance. She probably isn't as sexual aware as some but only black Africans get aids!!!!!!!

This woman would have been in her mid 20,s when the massive aids campaign was about, unless she had been locked in a closet it would have been difficult to miss any awareness on aids since then

As for the other point, people are adult enough to make their own decisions

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"A bukkake is risky yet greater risk is a Man spunking in a Woman unprotected.

You know it's easier to catch something from the eyes than through inside ?"

I didn't know that...

Yet, it make logic as the eyes are directly connected to the Brain that in-turn is connected to everything in the Human Body.

That's really interesting especially in case of Bukkake.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Also, the hit by a Car connection isn't clever or adding anything to this argument.

Allow me...

Is, it right for people on this site one that donates money to a charity that promote Safe Sex to place adverts for Unprotected Sex.

Now, this can't be stopped yet surely if a ban was placed on Bareback Meets especially Gangbangs (think about that), it would be responsible behaviour.

Time for a change, me thinks. "

Good for the site (I didn't know they did that. But it's up to the individual person what they do. People still need educating if that woman believed that only 10years ago !!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Sex with a condom isn't safe either so Fab, please could you ban fucking altogether? Merci.

Last one out please turn out the lights.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

It's up to people to decide what risks they can take.. and trust me many that bleat about always playing safe dont. I've been asked many tines for bare back x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *issHottieBottieWoman over a year ago

Kent

"Sex with a condom isn't safe either so Fab, please could you ban fucking altogether? Merci.

Last one out please turn out the lights."

Exactly. Lot of people thing just chuck a condom on for penetration and you're indestructible!! It's worrying really.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Also, the hit by a Car connection isn't clever or adding anything to this argument.

Allow me...

Is, it right for people on this site one that donates money to a charity that promote Safe Sex to place adverts for Unprotected Sex.

Now, this can't be stopped yet surely if a ban was placed on Bareback Meets especially Gangbangs (think about that), it would be responsible behaviour.

Time for a change, me thinks. "

It's as silly as your request !

We are all adults on here we can all choose to do what we like . I don't do BB but that's my CHOICE !!! And I uphold every ones right to make there own choice !!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Yeah it's not going to happen.

Do you ask a guy to put a rubber on while you give him a bj?

Do you use a dental dam?

I dread to think what'll happen in a few years. Have to provide a HIV/AIDS test for meets.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"OP... You don't have safe sex as an interest and you say you want to deliver yummy spunk to women and couples. Is that delivering it inside a condom?

Maybe, after seeing Rachel Dilley on 'This Morning' I've been reflecting on my own behaviour.

You are correct, yet the power of that inter_iew has made me think deeply."

But not deeply enough to want to change your profile preference to safe sex... However you are happy to ask the site owners to ban anyone that wants to engage in unsafe sex!?!?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Sex with a condom isn't safe either so Fab, please could you ban fucking altogether? Merci.

Last one out please turn out the lights."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I don't give a toss what ANYONE says....... Bareback sex with a stranger or even a casual lover is irresponsible, what if, eh???!! think about that, never mind Fab banning anything, for God's sake, are we not all intelligent and RESPONSIBLE adults on here...????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Get real please christ adults are free to make adult decisions there is enough censoring nowadays.

O p please just concentrate on you own life and make your own choices but leave others to live life as they choose.

Everyone should know the risks but up to all concerned to decide what they do.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

It's there choice though... Bareback is not illegal.. racism can have you arrested

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

Racism is against the law !!!!

Sex ( as long as your both consenting grown ups ) isn't !!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I read it as he is asking the site not to promote it....not to ban people actually doing it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"OP... You don't have safe sex as an interest and you say you want to deliver yummy spunk to women and couples. Is that delivering it inside a condom?

Maybe, after seeing Rachel Dilley on 'This Morning' I've been reflecting on my own behaviour.

You are correct, yet the power of that inter_iew has made me think deeply.

But not deeply enough to want to change your profile preference to safe sex... However you are happy to ask the site owners to ban anyone that wants to engage in unsafe sex!?!?

I've only just seen that, how did I NOT tick Safe Sex.

As I always, play Safe.

Am rather embarrassed but also thankful for you noticing that as now I realize why I was getting now & again messages from Couples asking if I wanted to take part in Bareback Gangbangs...!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Dear All,

On my day-off, I watched 'This Morning' [ITV] & what got me was an inter_iew with...

Rachel Dilley (aged 58).

The Inter_iew was about how at aged 48, Ms. Dilley got HIV via unprotected Sex.

She believed that only Black Africans could get this tragic disease hence her going bareback with a man she had just met

Which makes her pig-ignorant on two counts already.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Those who the God's intend to destroy, they first make insane".

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

Also are you kidding me . I don't know the stats but I will put money on racism is a lot more dangerous then sex . The risk of a racis atack must be higher than HIV !

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ezebelWoman over a year ago

North of The Wall - youll need your vest

Im going to send Ruggers on every meet organised by any person who is a member of this site to check that they are using a condom.

If they dont she is going to chop their cocks off.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I read it as he is asking the site not to promote it....not to ban people actually doing it. "

Nope he asks in op that if you arrange a meet and than ask for BB you should've band

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ezebelWoman over a year ago

North of The Wall - youll need your vest

"Im going to send Ruggers on every meet organised by any person who is a member of this site to check that they are using a condom.

If they dont she is going to chop their cocks off.

Shit I didnt she was logged on.

Dont tell her what I said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

To suggest a ban on such a thing is ridiculous personally I would never do bareback sex with anyone from here that's my choice.

What next a ban on farting.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

Also are you kidding me . I don't know the stats but I will put money on racism is a lot more dangerous then sex . The risk of a racis atack must be higher than HIV ! "
Absolute rubbish, sorry

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

Racism is against the law !!!!

Sex ( as long as your both consenting grown ups ) isn't !!!!"

Erm... that might not be correct as Adults know (hopefully) around the dangers of unprotected Sex therefore could one or a couple be responsible just as a Driver might be for have 8 Pints.

Am on the same debate on the L.A Porn Industry in 2015 going 100% Condom, as they have had to many tragic incidents of people getting H.I.V.

I like Fab to promote Safe Sex with education on the hazards of unprotected Sex also more kinky stuff like Bukkake.

I was unaware of what could happen in that situation.

If, they meaning the owners can now have Chat on Mobile Phones & Tablets then they can have in the above Toolbar a Safe Sex Education section.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"A bukkake is risky yet greater risk is a Man spunking in a Woman unprotected.

You know it's easier to catch something from the eyes than through inside ?

I didn't know that...

Yet, it make logic as the eyes are directly connected to the Brain that in-turn is connected to everything in the Human Body.

That's really interesting especially in case of Bukkake."

My assumption is how quickly it is absorbed into the body and into the bloodstream.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"To suggest a ban on such a thing is ridiculous personally I would never do bareback sex with anyone from here that's my choice.

What next a ban on farting."

How can you compare passing wind to that of an unprotected sex Gangbang in which a Woman takes 20 Men loads inside of her...!!!

At, times this site.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

Why are you worried, it has nothing to do with you.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *imjohnCouple over a year ago

Clacton on sea, Essex

I'll never condemn anyone for choosing BB, but I do think it's a bit naive to think you can ever know that person you fuck is disease free"

We always use condoms unless the other people have a cert/letter stating they have been fully tested within the last 28 days, we have this done every 28 days for work reasons.

We need our passport or driving license number documented on the letter to prove who we are on the day of the test & do the same when picking up the letter.

Using ID with the full certs it is possible to know that cert/letter belongs to that person.

Having regular tests don't make you bullet proof but it does make pin pointing an outbreak of STD's.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"To suggest a ban on such a thing is ridiculous personally I would never do bareback sex with anyone from here that's my choice.

What next a ban on farting."

Farting in the chat forum is already banned.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ugby 123Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

"Im going to send Ruggers on every meet organised by any person who is a member of this site to check that they are using a condom.

If they dont she is going to chop their cocks off.

Shit I didnt she was logged on.

Dont tell her what I said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"To suggest a ban on such a thing is ridiculous personally I would never do bareback sex with anyone from here that's my choice.

What next a ban on farting.

How can you compare passing wind to that of an unprotected sex Gangbang in which a Woman takes 20 Men loads inside of her...!!!

At, times this site.

It can be compared because neither can be controlled by a swinging site.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

The op's taking a great deal of flak when in fact he should be applauded for getting stuck in and daring to make a suggestion that was bound to raise the hackles of the 'each to their own' liberals on Fab. The op didn't suggest that fab could ban bareback, he suggested that fab could ban the 'promotion of bareback'. Is this possible? Yes, of course it is. Fab makes a good job of removing any content relating to underage sex and bestiality, so it would be easy to extend this control to bareback content.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *lassyandadventurousMan over a year ago

England and Wales

i would never have unprotected sex on here...people who do must be crazy but i realise it is the individals decision

no to a ban but maybe a few warnings might help

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Again, am NOT against people private choices what I feel worried about is open declarations looking for a group of men to ejaculate inside a Woman on this site...!!!

This site can't referee each meet but CAN have a ban on people promoting this dangerous behaviour banning those that do like racism.

So, a member can use a set of words against another around Ethnicity & been seen by the majority as being wrong deserving a ban yet...

a Couple (Male & Female) can arrange a Gangbang in which they want say 15 Men to spunk inside of her.

Which one is more dangerous, I wonder

Racism is against the law !!!!

Sex ( as long as your both consenting grown ups ) isn't !!!!

Erm... that might not be correct as Adults know (hopefully) around the dangers of unprotected Sex therefore could one or a couple be responsible just as a Driver might be for have 8 Pints.

Am on the same debate on the L.A Porn Industry in 2015 going 100% Condom, as they have had to many tragic incidents of people getting H.I.V.

I like Fab to promote Safe Sex with education on the hazards of unprotected Sex also more kinky stuff like Bukkake.

I was unaware of what could happen in that situation.

If, they meaning the owners can now have Chat on Mobile Phones & Tablets then they can have in the above Toolbar a Safe Sex Education section. "

Whats not correct ?

Drink driving is against the law fabs would ban an ad that said I want you to drink drive to are meet

Sex unprotected isn't !!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

I'll never condemn anyone for choosing BB, but I do think it's a bit naive to think you can ever know that person you fuck is disease free

We always use condoms unless the other people have a cert/letter stating they have been fully tested within the last 28 days, we have this done every 28 days for work reasons.

We need our passport or driving license number documented on the letter to prove who we are on the day of the test & do the same when picking up the letter.

Using ID with the full certs it is possible to know that cert/letter belongs to that person.

Having regular tests don't make you bullet proof but it does make pin pointing an outbreak of STD's."

If, only more people had that consideration.

This is what am going on about... awareness.

This site would correctly ban people for using racist language & am sure you would agree with this.

Yet, some are fine with Bareback Meets being openly promoted on this site, I don't understand.

Now, if MORE people had the approach of _imjohn, I'd be more relaxed yet sadly it seems a growing number of people do not.

Great message, _imjohn.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I'll never condemn anyone for choosing BB, but I do think it's a bit naive to think you can ever know that person you fuck is disease free

We always use condoms unless the other people have a cert/letter stating they have been fully tested within the last 28 days, we have this done every 28 days for work reasons.

We need our passport or driving license number documented on the letter to prove who we are on the day of the test & do the same when picking up the letter.

Using ID with the full certs it is possible to know that cert/letter belongs to that person.

Having regular tests don't make you bullet proof but it does make pin pointing an outbreak of STD's."
What are you....Porn stars?!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 13/03/14 19:05:22]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"The op's taking a great deal of flak when in fact he should be applauded for getting stuck in and daring to make a suggestion that was bound to raise the hackles of the 'each to their own' liberals on Fab. The op didn't suggest that fab could ban bareback, he suggested that fab could ban the 'promotion of bareback'. Is this possible? Yes, of course it is. Fab makes a good job of removing any content relating to underage sex and bestiality, so it would be easy to extend this control to bareback content."

Please read carefully what SashaCharlie just mentioned above as she is totally correct due to using logic.

Thank you, SashaCharlie.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"What are you....Porn stars?!!

And your point is????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Underage + bestiality = against the law

Sex is not !!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Why is it FAB 's responsibilty? Take responsibilty for your own sexual health!! We are all adults responsible for ourselves. Would you sue FAB if you caught something off a meet?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ugby 123Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

To be fair , the OP also says anyone arranging BB meets should be banned.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"What are you....Porn stars?!!

And your point is????"
Well, are you??!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

To be fair , the OP also says anyone arranging BB meets should be banned.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

If, only more people had that consideration.

This is what am going on about... awareness.

This site would correctly ban people for using racist language & am sure you would agree with this.

Yet, some are fine with Bareback Meets being openly promoted on this site, I don't understand.

Now, if MORE people had the approach of _imjohn, I'd be more relaxed yet sadly it seems a growing number of people do not.

Great message, _imjohn. "

People having unsafe sex is their 'preference'. A word used far too commonly in the forums. People using racist language are breaking the law. Look it up!

Hard to take you seriously when you've been on the site for over a year and only just noticed you didn't have safe sex listed as an option. I wonder how many meets you have had where you were contacted purely for that reason.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Am quite surprised in the amount of Women defending this rather risky behaviour as I'd always _iewed it more Men being the one's to express...

Total Freedom no matter the risk when it comes to Bareback Sex.

It's just something, I noticed no agenda on those as it's all about opinions.

Yet, are people comfortable with such dangerous meets being arranged?

I also _iew a contradiction in that this site donates money to a charity educating against such behaviour but then allowing to promote it.

Sort, of like a Worldwide Burger Chain giving money to a Vegan Educational Program.

Am, I correct yet the only way I'll gain awareness is via expressing my _iews then seeing what others feel.

Then reflection leading to a higher state of awareness.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

To be fair , the OP also says anyone arranging BB meets should be banned.

Yes, but that doesn't dilute the central question, which is: can a site like Fab claim to be sexually responsible when it turns a blind eye to the promotion of bareback sex?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

If, only more people had that consideration.

This is what am going on about... awareness.

This site would correctly ban people for using racist language & am sure you would agree with this.

Yet, some are fine with Bareback Meets being openly promoted on this site, I don't understand.

Now, if MORE people had the approach of _imjohn, I'd be more relaxed yet sadly it seems a growing number of people do not.

Great message, _imjohn.

People having unsafe sex is their 'preference'. A word used far too commonly in the forums. People using racist language are breaking the law. Look it up!

"
Thank you, thank you.....My ever-only preference on this fantastic site has been.....'Safe sex'.

I rest my case......all else is superfluous

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *B9 QueenWoman over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

I am totally anti-bb. I believe the risks just are not worth it. I have lost two friends to HIV and I intend to grow into a very disreputable old age.

That said, trying to ban such activity or the promotion of would be like plaiting fog.

I think better education and information is required. Ignorance kills.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

If, only more people had that consideration.

This is what am going on about... awareness.

This site would correctly ban people for using racist language & am sure you would agree with this.

Yet, some are fine with Bareback Meets being openly promoted on this site, I don't understand.

Now, if MORE people had the approach of _imjohn, I'd be more relaxed yet sadly it seems a growing number of people do not.

Great message, _imjohn.

People having unsafe sex is their 'preference'. A word used far too commonly in the forums. People using racist language are breaking the law. Look it up!

So, you've never made any silly mistakes in your life like...

walking into a lap-post, complimenting a Woman on being Pregnant only to realize she's over-weight or flirted with a person inter_iewing you for a job realizing they like it but the other 3 don't.

Guess, you are perfect then, no silly honset mistakes from you, Sir.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ugby 123Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

"Am quite surprised in the amount of Women defending this rather risky behaviour as I'd always _iewed it more Men being the one's to express...

Total Freedom no matter the risk when it comes to Bareback Sex.

It's just something, I noticed no agenda on those as it's all about opinions.

Yet, are people comfortable with such dangerous meets being arranged?

Because people say adults should decide what they want to do for themselves doesn't mean they are playing BB and arranging BB meets for themselves.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Underage + bestiality = against the law

Sex is not !!! "

And lives are ruined and lost by HIV. I think I just trumped you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Am quite surprised in the amount of Women defending this rather risky behaviour as I'd always _iewed it more Men being the one's to express...

Total Freedom no matter the risk when it comes to Bareback Sex.

It's just something, I noticed no agenda on those as it's all about opinions.

Yet, are people comfortable with such dangerous meets being arranged?

I also _iew a contradiction in that this site donates money to a charity educating against such behaviour but then allowing to promote it.

Sort, of like a Worldwide Burger Chain giving money to a Vegan Educational Program.

Am, I correct yet the only way I'll gain awareness is via expressing my _iews then seeing what others feel.

Then reflection leading to a higher state of awareness. "

As I have pointed out I myself would not risk BB.

But I defend to the hilt any ones right to choose there sexual preference !! As long as it's not against the law !!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Underage + bestiality = against the law

Sex is not !!!

And lives are ruined and lost by HIV. I think I just trumped you

Lol you can't ban every thing in life causes a lost life !

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I am totally anti-bb. I believe the risks just are not worth it. I have lost two friends to HIV and I intend to grow into a very disreputable old age.

That said, trying to ban such activity or the promotion of would be like plaiting fog.

I think better education and information is required. Ignorance kills."

Hell yes !!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *ugby 123Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

To be fair , the OP also says anyone arranging BB meets should be banned.

Yes, but that doesn't dilute the central question, which is: can a site like Fab claim to be sexually responsible when it turns a blind eye to the promotion of bareback sex?"

Is it promotion ?

A definition of promotion is "activity that supports or encourages a cause, venture, or aim."

I think Admin let Adults decide what they do with their lives rather than encourage us all to go BB.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"Am quite surprised in the amount of Women defending this rather risky behaviour as I'd always _iewed it more Men being the one's to express...

Total Freedom no matter the risk when it comes to Bareback Sex.

It's just something, I noticed no agenda on those as it's all about opinions.

Yet, are people comfortable with such dangerous meets being arranged?

I also _iew a contradiction in that this site donates money to a charity educating against such behaviour but then allowing to promote it.

Sort, of like a Worldwide Burger Chain giving money to a Vegan Educational Program.

Am, I correct yet the only way I'll gain awareness is via expressing my _iews then seeing what others feel.

Then reflection leading to a higher state of awareness.

As I have pointed out I myself would not risk BB.

But I defend to the hilt any ones right to choose there sexual preference !! As long as it's not against the law !! "

Am saying that as a collective we would be against individual(s) on this site saying something racist but also about a geographical location.

Am, from Liverpool & in my life have had lot's of abuse that is on-par with verbal racism yet the UK Law doesn't deem this illegal.

Yet, morally it's wrong as it can be very nasty & offensive.

Just last week, I was driving listening to BBC Radio 4 only to listen to a London Comedian - Bob Mills say some harsh things about the people of my city.

Some would say it's a laugh but harsh is harsh.

So, whilst laws don't cover everything the majority of people know what is & isn't on.

Subjective yeah, but I hope you can sort of understand my point of _iew

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

To be fair , the OP also says anyone arranging BB meets should be banned.

Yes, but that doesn't dilute the central question, which is: can a site like Fab claim to be sexually responsible when it turns a blind eye to the promotion of bareback sex?"

I do wish people would realise that Fab does not claim to be anything apart from a site that enables like minded people to meet. Do you need your doctor/gum clinic to tell you to use condoms? If you do then back away from the PC, if not then why do you need Fab to do it for you?

Why blame a website for peoples behaviour? It sounds like the woman the OP posted about wouldn't have understood when to where a condom if it had been put in 10' tall neon letters on her roof, yet Fab is suddenly irresponsible because of the stupid behaviour of its members.

I would understand if Fab was promoting unsafe sex or illegal activities but its not. Its like blaming the hammer for you hitting your thumb.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

It would be highly responsible to push the whole BB thing to the point people are not honest about it. Going on about banning it or making it illegal or what ever is farcical it couldn't be monitored it couldn't be policed its an idiotic ingestion it really is you only have to look at illegal narcotics how long they have been banned and how much is about to blow that idea out of the water. Its far better people are open about it and you can then avoid if you choose to and all this non safe sex, HIV preaching is just hypocritical as people in monogamous relationships would shout exactly the same thing about swinging in most cases as condoms are not the perfect solutions. Some people really need to get a life read what they post and realise how ludicrous they look at times.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *abioMan over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead

"Also, the hit by a Car connection isn't clever or adding anything to this argument.

actually.... yes it does...

you see.... everything is about judging the risks attached to certain types of behaviour....

be that bareback.... or oral without condoms... or kissing... or fingering... or not changing comdoms between partners at the list goes on and on and on....

the only true safe sex is no sex at all.. and I dont see you advocating for that...

next time have a look at the BSK mark on the side of a packet of condoms.... they are only 98% effective....

so back to the road analogy....

you could cross a road at a zebra/traffic lights.. or not... or if you were really brave/stupid, how about crossing a 6 lane motorway????

again it is all about judging the risks attacked to a certain activity!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"It would be highly responsible to push the whole BB thing to the point people are not honest about it. Going on about banning it or making it illegal or what ever is farcical it couldn't be monitored it couldn't be policed its an idiotic ingestion it really is you only have to look at illegal narcotics how long they have been banned and how much is about to blow that idea out of the water. Its far better people are open about it and you can then avoid if you choose to and all this non safe sex, HIV preaching is just hypocritical as people in monogamous relationships would shout exactly the same thing about swinging in most cases as condoms are not the perfect solutions. Some people really need to get a life read what they post and realise how ludicrous they look at times.

Amazing post xx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Think we will sit back have a ciggie and a bottle of wine and watch this unravel.....

Oohh wait....that's not good for you either....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I've just seen that the OP's profile states he likes watersports. Surely pissing all over someone, which can include in the mouth to, isn't very safe or hygienic either.

Pot calling kettle black in my opinion. As everyone says, each to their own.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Also, the hit by a Car connection isn't clever or adding anything to this argument.

actually.... yes it does...

you see.... everything is about judging the risks attached to certain types of behaviour....

be that bareback.... or oral without condoms... or kissing... or fingering... or not changing comdoms between partners at the list goes on and on and on....

the only true safe sex is no sex at all.. and I dont see you advocating for that...

next time have a look at the BSK mark on the side of a packet of condoms.... they are only 98% effective....

so back to the road analogy....

you could cross a road at a zebra/traffic lights.. or not... or if you were really brave/stupid, how about crossing a 6 lane motorway????

again it is all about judging the risks attacked to a certain activity!

try x

The only ( true ) safe sex is no sex , any one that arranges a meet then askes you for sex , report to admin and they should be baned !!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

"Think we will sit back have a ciggie and a bottle of wine and watch this unravel.....

Oohh wait....that's not good for you either...."

Lets all wrap ourselves in clingfilm and never leave the house.

Although that sounds a bit kinky

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By *B9 QueenWoman over a year ago

Over the rainbow, under the bridge

"I've just seen that the OP's profile states he likes watersports. Surely pissing all over someone, which can include in the mouth to, isn't very safe or hygienic either.

Pot calling kettle black in my opinion. As everyone says, each to their own. "

That would not transmit the HIV virus though - that is only transmitted via bodily fluids which are produced by the lymphatic system - including sperm. Urine is not produced in that manner. Furthermore, urine is said to be sterile.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

To be fair , the OP also says anyone arranging BB meets should be banned.

Yes, but that doesn't dilute the central question, which is: can a site like Fab claim to be sexually responsible when it turns a blind eye to the promotion of bareback sex?

I would understand if Fab was promoting unsafe sex or illegal activities but its not. Its like blaming the hammer for you hitting your thumb. "

Am saying that due to what I've watched a real person suffering from H.I.V going on National TV & being very brave, it's made me think.

I just think if Bareback Meets especially Gangbangs (think on that) where banned then the site is being responsible.

People can arrange what they want but not on this site also even with the Levenson Inquiry now stopping the UK Tabloid Press looking into the personal lives of people they could get around this by simply reporting the fact that people on THIS very site promote meets in which a Woman requires 15 men to Spunk inside of her.

This would be on 'Public Health Reasons' meaning that Paper couldn't be sued.

Yet, the negative publicity would damage this site leading to many people leaving in droves.

If, the owners of this site had that awareness then would it be such a terrible thing to have a ban/block on the promoting of Bareback.

Is, that such a crime against free expression of rather some smart thinking.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

"I've just seen that the OP's profile states he likes watersports. Surely pissing all over someone, which can include in the mouth to, isn't very safe or hygienic either.

Pot calling kettle black in my opinion. As everyone says, each to their own. "

Am learning new things yet I've never done Watersports just a kinky idea dream that after seeing 'This Morning' is not not happening.

Back to re-edit me Profile.