 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Currently into this and loving it, anyone find this intriguing or is it too extreme, definition below -
A form of role play used by 2 consenting adults that incorporates Racist, hurtful, & derogatory terms and comments regarding the others race, to fulfill and reach sexual pleasure  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No.
Keeping an open mind for discussion I suspect race play must happen quite a bit. It probably comes down to what the individuals consider derogatory.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rpeggioCouple
over a year ago
Baughurst |
We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.
I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.
If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.
I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.
If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc."
I disagree that it’s a manifestation of who someone is for real I’ve played with a few girls and couples into it and they are good people , and I certainly wouldn’t justify rap*play, paed*play it’s not for me. I do of course respect your opinion though, fair play  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.
I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.
If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc."
Sorry but disagree, our fetishes do not define who we are as people and the way we act. I'm a sadist and I don't go around hitting people with paddles and canes in my day to day life. I have also done this play before but it was totally at her request and the reason she asked me is she knew she could trust me to do the research, play within her limits and help her fulfil her fantasy of it. This post is just kink shaming because you don't get it. Won't even start on the r**eplay situation and basically shaming victims who use it as a way to manage and take control and ownership of their trauma and help them to deal and process it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rpeggioCouple
over a year ago
Baughurst |
"We find this repulsive and would not even want to have a conversation with a couple if we know they do it, basically it's a key part of our short profile for anyone who happens to read it.
I cannot imagine or understand how anyone that is not a racist in life would find sexually arousing to humiliate someone based on their race. It might be consensual play, but it's a manifestation of who you are for real.
If you justify this as just fantasy roleplay, others will justify rap*play, paed*play etc.
Sorry but disagree, our fetishes do not define who we are as people and the way we act. I'm a sadist and I don't go around hitting people with paddles and canes in my day to day life. I have also done this play before but it was totally at her request and the reason she asked me is she knew she could trust me to do the research, play within her limits and help her fulfil her fantasy of it. This post is just kink shaming because you don't get it. Won't even start on the r**eplay situation and basically shaming victims who use it as a way to manage and take control and ownership of their trauma and help them to deal and process it. "
__
Totally respect your view and you nailed it. We do not understand it. OP is asking who finds it interesting or who finds it too extreme. We are on the latter end of the spectrum in this case.
No one is shaming victims who use this as part of managing trauma. That we can understand as motivation. Very different from two consenting adults, none of them victims of r*pe who engage in that flavour of roleplay for fun. We respect it, but we cannot understand it, and so it's also fair that we are allowed to say
that we dislike it. If were to understand it, we may change our mind. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ensualMan
over a year ago
Sutton |
It is not for me, but a difficult kink does not need to be badged "therapy" to be accepted as an individual choice. In fact therapy is best dealt with by a trained therapist.
It is perfectly acceptable to say a kink is not for you. What is not acceptable is to condemn two or more consenting adults playing in private and not exposing third parties to their play.
I would argue that OP was wrong to go into detail, as he was exposing people to detail. Any contentious kink should be handled tactfully in regard to those not taking part.
I would also argue that unlike the hedonists, lifestylers, and kink tourists who only play, I would say my kinks are a part of me. But as a rationale functioning kink educated ethical human being, they are only exercised with full consent and not randomly. Many people who practice difficult kinks are the same. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Some good points here and I can genuinely see both sides which is why I deleted my initial comment.
I also think people can have kinks that are not necessarily who they are. Maybe some part of them might enjoy certain aspects doesn't mean they have a desire or would engage in this outside of "play" Eg (CNC, impact etc). And that's leaving aside the number of people that use terminology or seek out bbc, bwc. One could argue a link there.
So while I might not engage in it, I'm conscious not to judge or shame or be so intolerant because even my kinks which I may find tame would be intolerable to many.
Heck a lot of people cannot understand the concept of swinging. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It is not for me, but a difficult kink does not need to be badged "therapy" to be accepted as an individual choice. In fact therapy is best dealt with by a trained therapist.
It is perfectly acceptable to say a kink is not for you. What is not acceptable is to condemn two or more consenting adults playing in private and not exposing third parties to their play.
I would argue that OP was wrong to go into detail, as he was exposing people to detail. Any contentious kink should be handled tactfully in regard to those not taking part.
I would also argue that unlike the hedonists, lifestylers, and kink tourists who only play, I would say my kinks are a part of me. But as a rationale functioning kink educated ethical human being, they are only exercised with full consent and not randomly. Many people who practice difficult kinks are the same. "
That’s fair |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
not for me though certainly not 