FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Are single women Lazy on fab ?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That’s great to hear that in your experience it’s equal, but it’s also the first time we’ve heard that. Brilliant for you guys though " Don't get me wrong there's some that will reply with one word and not engage much but then there not for is but the majority chat equally Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox ... are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ?" Single females can indeed search. And they do, if/when they want. Option is there. So what are you proposing exactly to make Fab better? Better for whom? For your single profiles? or for women? If the bulging inbox is a problem, single women profiles can totally block singles males (we have, as a couple, it works), then search, then approach single males or whomever they want. Option is there, so not sure what change are you proposing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hi Flik thanks for replying, it’s good to hear you approach it that way and this thread really isn’t a generalisation of every single lady, we’ve had some great meets and convos with single ladies it’s more directed at the whole process of fab and the scene I guess, but your approach seems to be the best one " If you click reply and quote we know who your replying to. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hi Flik thanks for replying, it’s good to hear you approach it that way and this thread really isn’t a generalisation of every single lady, we’ve had some great meets and convos with single ladies it’s more directed at the whole process of fab and the scene I guess, but your approach seems to be the best one If you click reply and quote we know who your replying to. Mrs " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hi Flik thanks for replying, it’s good to hear you approach it that way and this thread really isn’t a generalisation of every single lady, we’ve had some great meets and convos with single ladies it’s more directed at the whole process of fab and the scene I guess, but your approach seems to be the best one " To be fair it'll be down to the individual. I'm usually the one to approach people out in general life and it was me that approached Paul in a coffee shop and asked to sit with him which ended up with him being my partner, and that was before I discovered this lifestyle. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hi Flik thanks for replying, it’s good to hear you approach it that way and this thread really isn’t a generalisation of every single lady, we’ve had some great meets and convos with single ladies it’s more directed at the whole process of fab and the scene I guess, but your approach seems to be the best one To be fair it'll be down to the individual. I'm usually the one to approach people out in general life and it was me that approached Paul in a coffee shop and asked to sit with him which ended up with him being my partner, and that was before I discovered this lifestyle." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ah great, thanks for the pointer, it’s our first time posting in the forums. Hi Flik thanks for replying, it’s good to hear you approach it that way and this thread really isn’t a generalisation of every single lady, we’ve had some great meets and convos with single ladies it’s more directed at the whole process of fab and the scene I guess, but your approach seems to be the best one If you click reply and quote we know who your replying to. Mrs " No worries, welcome to the forums. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That’s great that you approach it like that and much respect for doing so, like you say you’ve a wealth of knowledge and experience of what works for you and we respect that massively but would you say the wider scene is like that ? " yes today scene is very very picky compared to what happened back when we started we alway seek those we were attracted to but many many never used to but now deffo couples are more fussy now than ever (thats a good thing in my mind) and women seeking women well thats very very fussy now compared to years ago... women and couples seeking men has massively changed too the more men the scene attracted the fussier we all become..... everything is based on attraction now (again how i think it should be) where in the past not so it was more based on just fun .... swinging has gotten very selective therefore making it much harder for many to find what they want hence we only use fab to seek guys as everything else is much easier face to face ie clubs and nights out .... i also think socials have destroyed a chunk of the scene far tomany just use the scene as a social network dont get me wrong socials are important but we swing for sex with others so when socials become 80/90% of your free time wheres the sex the very reason why you wanted to swing.. the rise of the internet and social media has killed the art of talking flirting its killed communication skills for many alot of men dont have a clue how to interact with women (only saying men as i only look for men via here) all is just my opinion we all see things and do things differently and intodays world that does not make us right or wrong | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We aren’t proposing any change at all we certainly don’t have the power to achieve a whole scale change of the swinging scene and we aren’t arrogant enough to believe such, we are simply posting a question based on our and others we have met and had conversations with experiences great to hear your insight though. " Thanks and apologies that I could not offer much of an insight, more like trying to understand if you were posting about a hypothetical change of behaviour by women in Fab or some technical change ( e.g Fab not allowing women to receive messages). Very insightful responses from others so far, good thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thats was messy lol needs another coffee then im off to work " Hahaha no great response and your 100% right In what you say, we couldn’t agree more in terms of the communication side of things you’ve hit the nail on the head, go enjoy your coffee haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do get inbound from ladies so I know people do engage. In my experience those who initiate the conversation are usually pretty likely to meet as they have actively found what they are looking for." Great to hear that’s your experience and your right, I think in a sense your agreeing with our point those that search are getting a more worthwhile experience very indirectly haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do get inbound from ladies so I know people do engage. In my experience those who initiate the conversation are usually pretty likely to meet as they have actively found what they are looking for." all my lady friends on this scene and on fab seek rather than be seeked but they are all pretty much like me fab for the guys clubs and nights out for fem on fem many of them not interested in couples at all.. opinions are good no one is right or wrong when it comes to how they use the scene or how or who they meet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am in similar boat to another single lady, I don't need to message people on here as I already have some men that I see on a semi-regular basis. And I am currently only meeting anyone new by chance, in a club, with a possibility for 1:1 meets further on, if we get on well in the club. I also have zero interest in couples after some not so great experience where I was basically lied to about how bisexual the lady was (on more than one occasion). Therefore, I am only happy to play with couples in a club, again just by chance. In the past, however, I have sent first messages - my partner is a prime example. I messaged him first, we started chatting, then life tried to get very much in the way, yet we are still together (at weekends only, both as good as single during the week) nearly 5 years down the line. So yes, single women do get proactive and do message people themselves when they feel the person/people fit what they are looking for or they feel there is already a connection. " Oh 100% I’d agree a very small percentage of single ladies do search and send messages and from what’s been posted so far it’s those women that A get what they are looking for and B seem to have the best experience, as much as this thread seems to be aimed at single ladies which I guess it is, we are also fully aware that there is issues with certain peoples approach be that single men or couples also. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do get inbound from ladies so I know people do engage. In my experience those who initiate the conversation are usually pretty likely to meet as they have actively found what they are looking for. all my lady friends on this scene and on fab seek rather than be seeked but they are all pretty much like me fab for the guys clubs and nights out for fem on fem many of them not interested in couples at all.. opinions are good no one is right or wrong when it comes to how they use the scene or how or who they meet" Your exactly right at the end of the day we are all in it for ourselves and our own gains to a degree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a single guy, I feel alot of single ladies, especially the ones around my age, think they’re much better than single men and if we do manage to get a reply, they normally speak to us as if we owe them something for replying to us. Don’t get me wrong, I understand their inbox is probably full of idiots just wanting to collect pictures or what have you, but for us genuine guys who have verifications, it makes it very hard as I personally, like to be spoken to how I’d speak to someone." I’d have to say that for the most part as much as I won’t tar every single lady with the same brush that seems to be more inclined with what we have heard and experienced ourselves both as a couple and as singles prior to us getting together on here. Great comment though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a single guy, I feel alot of single ladies, especially the ones around my age, think they’re much better than single men and if we do manage to get a reply, they normally speak to us as if we owe them something for replying to us. Don’t get me wrong, I understand their inbox is probably full of idiots just wanting to collect pictures or what have you, but for us genuine guys who have verifications, it makes it very hard as I personally, like to be spoken to how I’d speak to someone." see i dont think women tend to think this way i think you think that because for whatever reason they are maybe not interested in you ? ... women of today are way more confident in themselves and why should that not be the case... they know that on this scene they can be picky just because of the sheer number of men on here and with 100s joining daily with hardly any women or couples joining it will only get worse ... not all so dont shoot me for saying this but many men will shag anything therefore have a different view where most women wont and would rather wait for the right people and the right time... dont get me wrong men have a terrible time on this scene but its down to % mainly not women looking down thats just men thinking that because they are getting nowhere (again not all) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a single guy, I feel alot of single ladies, especially the ones around my age, think they’re much better than single men and if we do manage to get a reply, they normally speak to us as if we owe them something for replying to us. Don’t get me wrong, I understand their inbox is probably full of idiots just wanting to collect pictures or what have you, but for us genuine guys who have verifications, it makes it very hard as I personally, like to be spoken to how I’d speak to someone. see i dont think women tend to think this way i think you think that because for whatever reason they are maybe not interested in you ? ... women of today are way more confident in themselves and why should that not be the case... they know that on this scene they can be picky just because of the sheer number of men on here and with 100s joining daily with hardly any women or couples joining it will only get worse ... not all so dont shoot me for saying this but many men will shag anything therefore have a different view where most women wont and would rather wait for the right people and the right time... dont get me wrong men have a terrible time on this scene but its down to % mainly not women looking down thats just men thinking that because they are getting nowhere (again not all)" Clearly that’s his experience of it though so we can’t dismiss that from the conversation, that’s the positive side to these forums it offers a platform for all to have an opinion to give balance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a single guy, I feel alot of single ladies, especially the ones around my age, think they’re much better than single men and if we do manage to get a reply, they normally speak to us as if we owe them something for replying to us. Don’t get me wrong, I understand their inbox is probably full of idiots just wanting to collect pictures or what have you, but for us genuine guys who have verifications, it makes it very hard as I personally, like to be spoken to how I’d speak to someone. see i dont think women tend to think this way i think you think that because for whatever reason they are maybe not interested in you ? ... women of today are way more confident in themselves and why should that not be the case... they know that on this scene they can be picky just because of the sheer number of men on here and with 100s joining daily with hardly any women or couples joining it will only get worse ... not all so dont shoot me for saying this but many men will shag anything therefore have a different view where most women wont and would rather wait for the right people and the right time... dont get me wrong men have a terrible time on this scene but its down to % mainly not women looking down thats just men thinking that because they are getting nowhere (again not all) Clearly that’s his experience of it though so we can’t dismiss that from the conversation, that’s the positive side to these forums it offers a platform for all to have an opinion to give balance." thats very true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find it kind of strange to assume single women don't search. I do, I suspect many others do too. Wether or not we/they are interested in what they find is another thing. But if I like the profile etc, then I will message " For us that’s great you do that and we respect that approach, the reason for the post though is generally from speaking to not just couples or single men but women also that, that isn’t the wider case in our experience, I don’t feel we’ve assumed however as we’ve posed the question rather than simply assuming based on our experience | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We find this as a couple or they are fakes" Likewise we agree as that’s our wider experience also | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a single guy, I feel alot of single ladies, especially the ones around my age, think they’re much better than single men and if we do manage to get a reply, they normally speak to us as if we owe them something for replying to us. Don’t get me wrong, I understand their inbox is probably full of idiots just wanting to collect pictures or what have you, but for us genuine guys who have verifications, it makes it very hard as I personally, like to be spoken to how I’d speak to someone. see i dont think women tend to think this way i think you think that because for whatever reason they are maybe not interested in you ? ... women of today are way more confident in themselves and why should that not be the case... they know that on this scene they can be picky just because of the sheer number of men on here and with 100s joining daily with hardly any women or couples joining it will only get worse ... not all so dont shoot me for saying this but many men will shag anything therefore have a different view where most women wont and would rather wait for the right people and the right time... dont get me wrong men have a terrible time on this scene but its down to % mainly not women looking down thats just men thinking that because they are getting nowhere (again not all)" I completely understand the numbers allow women to be picky, but they actually respond saying they’re interested, but then give nothing in the form of conversation and presume the man has to make all the effort to make conversation, prove they’re legit, where the woman sits back with no verifications, on their high horse, expecting the man to jump through any hoop thrown at us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested " I agree, but that goes for all single ladies, single men, couples or TV’s etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested " For some people on here you would need to take it on as a full time job replying to every message you get and then sometimes hit with abuse | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested For some people on here you would need to take it on as a full time job replying to every message you get and then sometimes hit with abuse " Surely it’s just manners though ? Or is it because we are online that makes the difference ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested For some people on here you would need to take it on as a full time job replying to every message you get and then sometimes hit with abuse Surely it’s just manners though ? Or is it because we are online that makes the difference ? " For us it depends on the messages. If someone has took their time to write a nice message we will reply but if we have ones being disrespectful definitely not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m another who searches and puts in the effort. I take time with my profile to attract and deselect as appropriate. I have saved searches I run regularly. I message, wink and fab to show interest. I’m active in the forums and keep an eye on updates to see if there is anything I want to react to. I think you’re right that there will be some who do none of that. But if you’re online regularly as a single woman, the messages stack up and it can be easy to get caught up dealing with that and forget to do what you came here for. " It’s great you do and fair play to you, I guess your right in saying about sheer volume but I think it comes down to you as an individual in regards to replying, for us seeing someone has messaged and we do have a fairly active inbox believe it or not but I’d reply to every message just out of politeness due to the fact that person has taken time to contact us | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested " Even if they’re outside my preferences? (I leave my filters off because I play various games on forum threads.) Even if it’s just “hi”? Even if it’s “you look like your pussy needs to be pounded hard” (it’s in my profile that it doesn’t). Even if they’re in a relationship? (It’s clear in my profile I don’t play with attached men) No one owes you a reply. Just because you think you’re sending a good message, doesn’t mean the recipient does. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If i like the profile i’ll engage first, message, wink, fab pics etc. I'm ok with no replies coming back and don't need a no thanks message. As someone else said meeting folk in clubs is far easier that using fab sometimes. Xxx" It’s all down to personal preference I guess a lot of people love the clubs and us for example have no interest in them, but fair play for taking the bull by the horns and seeking out what you want | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m another who searches and puts in the effort. I take time with my profile to attract and deselect as appropriate. I have saved searches I run regularly. I message, wink and fab to show interest. I’m active in the forums and keep an eye on updates to see if there is anything I want to react to. I think you’re right that there will be some who do none of that. But if you’re online regularly as a single woman, the messages stack up and it can be easy to get caught up dealing with that and forget to do what you came here for. It’s great you do and fair play to you, I guess your right in saying about sheer volume but I think it comes down to you as an individual in regards to replying, for us seeing someone has messaged and we do have a fairly active inbox believe it or not but I’d reply to every message just out of politeness due to the fact that person has taken time to contact us " I woke up to 280 this morning. Not high numbers, but enough. And see my post above as to why many don’t get a reply | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's worth remembering that for some people, fab is only a tiny slice of life. It's a low priority for many, so being ultra selective with our engagement doesn't feel like a problem. Also, single gals have to consider their safety, more so than I think some folk realise. That can mean being very picky with who we message, as well as how much we engage at all. " As much as we respect the safety comment I am not sure that’s relative to how we select and message people, let’s be honest I am sure Ted Bundy didn’t have serial rapist and murder plastered all over his Fab profile hence we would avoid him like the plague, again being picky there’s no issue with that and the comment was aimed more at the larger selection of singles that don’t even attempt to engage first in any kind of way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It’s great you do and fair play to you, I guess your right in saying about sheer volume but I think it comes down to you as an individual in regards to replying, for us seeing someone has messaged and we do have a fairly active inbox believe it or not but I’d reply to every message just out of politeness due to the fact that person has taken time to contact us " If women (or anyone) reply to someone then if they later block all guys (for example) then every single one that’s had a polite “no thank you” reply is exempt from the block as the algorithm sees that as a two way conversation. That’s one of the big reasons people don’t reply to every message that they get, as well as the abuse that tends to come back from a polite no. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It’s great you do and fair play to you, I guess your right in saying about sheer volume but I think it comes down to you as an individual in regards to replying, for us seeing someone has messaged and we do have a fairly active inbox believe it or not but I’d reply to every message just out of politeness due to the fact that person has taken time to contact us If women (or anyone) reply to someone then if they later block all guys (for example) then every single one that’s had a polite “no thank you” reply is exempt from the block as the algorithm sees that as a two way conversation. That’s one of the big reasons people don’t reply to every message that they get, as well as the abuse that tends to come back from a polite no. " Can we block individuals on here ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested " Why? Does verbally saying no thanks make anything better? A no reply is a no thank you (fab rules) Plus once you've replied if you then block men that person can still message, a big majority of men and women in our case don't take a no thank you well, leave the inbox open to abuse. Plus why should I reply to - People who send 1 word. Flash their unwanted cock in my box. Haven't read our profile. Our of our age ranges. Why is it down to me to respond to people who shouldn't have messaged in the 1st place?? Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested Why? Does verbally saying no thanks make anything better? A no reply is a no thank you (fab rules) Plus once you've replied if you then block men that person can still message, a big majority of men and women in our case don't take a no thank you well, leave the inbox open to abuse. Plus why should I reply to - People who send 1 word. Flash their unwanted cock in my box. Haven't read our profile. Our of our age ranges. Why is it down to me to respond to people who shouldn't have messaged in the 1st place?? Mrs " I’d agree with part of this not reading profiles, being down right disrespectful or putting little effort in, I’d 100% agree don’t reply, but for a decent genuine bloke putting the hard yards in just a simple thanks but no thanks I don’t think is too much to ask for I also think your point about rejecting someone is fair but it’s part of the process isn’t it and should someone be on fab at all if they can’t handle taking no as an answer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested Why? Does verbally saying no thanks make anything better? A no reply is a no thank you (fab rules) Plus once you've replied if you then block men that person can still message, a big majority of men and women in our case don't take a no thank you well, leave the inbox open to abuse. Plus why should I reply to - People who send 1 word. Flash their unwanted cock in my box. Haven't read our profile. Our of our age ranges. Why is it down to me to respond to people who shouldn't have messaged in the 1st place?? Mrs I’d agree with part of this not reading profiles, being down right disrespectful or putting little effort in, I’d 100% agree don’t reply, but for a decent genuine bloke putting the hard yards in just a simple thanks but no thanks I don’t think is too much to ask for I also think your point about rejecting someone is fair but it’s part of the process isn’t it and should someone be on fab at all if they can’t handle taking no as an answer." You may change your mind after a few months of polite no thank you's and the abuse in return. I used to do that the no thank you's. Definitely not anymore. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When you have sent a message it would be nice to get a reply even if it’s to say you are not interested Why? Does verbally saying no thanks make anything better? A no reply is a no thank you (fab rules) Plus once you've replied if you then block men that person can still message, a big majority of men and women in our case don't take a no thank you well, leave the inbox open to abuse. Plus why should I reply to - People who send 1 word. Flash their unwanted cock in my box. Haven't read our profile. Our of our age ranges. Why is it down to me to respond to people who shouldn't have messaged in the 1st place?? Mrs I’d agree with part of this not reading profiles, being down right disrespectful or putting little effort in, I’d 100% agree don’t reply, but for a decent genuine bloke putting the hard yards in just a simple thanks but no thanks I don’t think is too much to ask for I also think your point about rejecting someone is fair but it’s part of the process isn’t it and should someone be on fab at all if they can’t handle taking no as an answer. You may change your mind after a few months of polite no thank you's and the abuse in return. I used to do that the no thank you's. Definitely not anymore. Mrs " You may well be right, but once that time comes for us it’ll be the right time to bow out I’d think, like I say it’s just down to personal approach and not a disagreement we all have our own ways | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You may change your mind after a few months of polite no thank you's and the abuse in return. I used to do that the no thank you's. Definitely not anymore. Mrs " Oh yes… if it’s a decent message I do generally reply. Then sometimes regret it - “I know you said, but…” or “I am in the area a couple of times a month though.” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have an analogy to sort of explain this… If you’re a fisherman out in your boat, and hundreds of fish are literally throwing themselves into your boat constantly…. Would you spend your time dangling your line in the water while your boat becomes overloaded….. or would you just sort through the ones on deck that you want to keep and throw the rest back?" Hahaha great analogy love it, but what about that prized mackerel that needs a bit more effort ? How will you ever bag the prized asset haha love it, 100% my fave response so far | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People get to use fab however they want. Yes if they complain you can advise them to be more proactive but many of us only just about cope with incoming messages and continued conversations." Very true and we certainly at no point have said anyone must do anything, but there’s also a lot of these people are highly negative about it so we think it’s a more than viable question to ask | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't like to just rely on my inbox which is dead at the moment because I'm hidden haha. If I'm meeting then I will actively seek out people that interest me initially either by messaging or winking and take it from there. I think if the ratios were different then people would be more proactive for sure but they're not. " So in a sense you kind of agree obviously aside from your own personal approach | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I totally understand I’m not your target audience but I’ll try to explain anyway in hope it sheds some light on your question. It’s really not that difficult to manage an overflowing inbox. Put filters on, hide your profile, don’t post explicit pictures or horny updates, simple as that really. Or if it’s what you like to do, be prepared to deal with it, within your capacity. Women do engage with whom they want to engage but still we are being left with fantasists, people who will ghost on some point, dishonest people, the ones who won’t read the profile or just life, in general. There’s no simple answer for that. I like to attend fab socials and make real face to face connections. It saves all the fab frustration, you know exactly with who you are going to click (or not) and just take it from there. Hope it helps a little." Great reply, thank you. I think in reply to your women do engage with whom they want too part that’s the same for all of us I’d think and it’s a massive part of the issue fab has it’s not just specific to women, but your right about the social side of it over all of your genuine the sooner you can move it off fab to meeting in person the sooner your going to tell if your going to have a meaningful experience in what ever route that is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have an analogy to sort of explain this… If you’re a fisherman out in your boat, and hundreds of fish are literally throwing themselves into your boat constantly…. Would you spend your time dangling your line in the water while your boat becomes overloaded….. or would you just sort through the ones on deck that you want to keep and throw the rest back?" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t say single women on here are lazy because I’ve had a few directly reach out to me unexpectedly on a number of occasions and I’m able to meet/connect with plenty when I attend clubs and parties. Biology and old fashioned societal values demonstrate that some women prefer to be the chasee as opposed to the chaser and this site fully perpetuates that. The lack of interaction and engagement (from some) also does to tend harbour a level of resentment to a certain degree from unsuccessful chasers. " Great reply, thanks why was it unexpected for them to reach out ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t say single women on here are lazy because I’ve had a few directly reach out to me unexpectedly on a number of occasions and I’m able to meet/connect with plenty when I attend clubs and parties. Biology and old fashioned societal values demonstrate that some women prefer to be the chasee as opposed to the chaser and this site fully perpetuates that. The lack of interaction and engagement (from some) also does to tend harbour a level of resentment to a certain degree from unsuccessful chasers. Great reply, thanks why was it unexpected for them to reach out ? " I was surprised that my profile had caught someone’s attention whenever a woman/couple message first, I always ask them specifically what stood out about my profile? They have 100’s to choose from so why me? Kinda to see if they’ve actually read my profile because l like to think it covers quite a lot | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ?" I actively search for what I want. My profile is set so I don't get loads of messages.. that or I don't appeal to people. I go to clubs and find what I want that way. Fab for me is more about keeping in touch with friends and seeing what's on and where x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If the female in your couple was single, would she send messages? I don't send them when I meet as a single woman, mainly because when I have I have experienced pressure to meet when I may be trying to work out if the guy is for me. As for couples, I would only meet these with N as that's what feels most comfortable for me. I meet women alone - not from fab." She has prior to us being together and did reply | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t say single women on here are lazy because I’ve had a few directly reach out to me unexpectedly on a number of occasions and I’m able to meet/connect with plenty when I attend clubs and parties. Biology and old fashioned societal values demonstrate that some women prefer to be the chasee as opposed to the chaser and this site fully perpetuates that. The lack of interaction and engagement (from some) also does to tend harbour a level of resentment to a certain degree from unsuccessful chasers. Great reply, thanks why was it unexpected for them to reach out ? I was surprised that my profile had caught someone’s attention whenever a woman/couple message first, I always ask them specifically what stood out about my profile? They have 100’s to choose from so why me? Kinda to see if they’ve actually read my profile because l like to think it covers quite a lot " That’s fair enough and shows your really approaching it in the right way so fair play to you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ?" If a woman Fabs a pic the person tends to think she will guarantee a fuck with them. Same for any interaction. If I message first then decide they're not for me they often get annoyed. "Why did you message me if you won't fuck me??!!" Many men have shit profiles. Look through hundreds to find one with decent text and no cock pics. However when I'm arranging a fantasy scenario I always go looking for someone specific. Works great. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? I actively search for what I want. My profile is set so I don't get loads of messages.. that or I don't appeal to people. I go to clubs and find what I want that way. Fab for me is more about keeping in touch with friends and seeing what's on and where x" As long as your profile states that you only want contact with friends then no issue from us you’re totally entitled to use it In that manner I’d say | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? If a woman Fabs a pic the person tends to think she will guarantee a fuck with them. Same for any interaction. If I message first then decide they're not for me they often get annoyed. "Why did you message me if you won't fuck me??!!" Many men have shit profiles. Look through hundreds to find one with decent text and no cock pics. However when I'm arranging a fantasy scenario I always go looking for someone specific. Works great. " Shit profiles aren’t just on men trust me some couples and women have pretty awful profiles | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Having been a single lady and in a couple I can honestly say I never ever had to message anyone to meet as a single lady That’s not me blowing smoke up my arse haha that is just how it is for most if not all single ladies on here We do not get anywhere near as many messages as a couple compared to single So yes, I was a pretty lazy fabber as a solo lol " Respect for the honesty, love it hahaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Having been a single lady and in a couple I can honestly say I never ever had to message anyone to meet as a single lady That’s not me blowing smoke up my arse haha that is just how it is for most if not all single ladies on here We do not get anywhere near as many messages as a couple compared to single So yes, I was a pretty lazy fabber as a solo lol Respect for the honesty, love it hahaha " Haha I’m nothing but honest Trouble is , single girls are fought out by everyone on the site really Often thought it would be nice if the fab filters were more detailed to find play wise what you are after ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Having been a single lady and in a couple I can honestly say I never ever had to message anyone to meet as a single lady That’s not me blowing smoke up my arse haha that is just how it is for most if not all single ladies on here We do not get anywhere near as many messages as a couple compared to single So yes, I was a pretty lazy fabber as a solo lol Respect for the honesty, love it hahaha Haha I’m nothing but honest Trouble is , single girls are fought out by everyone on the site really Often thought it would be nice if the fab filters were more detailed to find play wise what you are after ? " That’s a pretty good idea though to maybe expand the filters a bit more based on play preference etc especially for incoming messages | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im sure there are a few "ladies" profile that engage with other ppl but they tend to be fakes or timewasters." That's obviously where I'm going wrong then as I have a single female account although I will make first contact, wink, fab and message but obviously that makes me a fake and a timewaster, at least now I know why I get so much abuse out of nowhere, get stood up, have people ghost me or just vanish because I'm the fake | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Im sure there are a few "ladies" profile that engage with other ppl but they tend to be fakes or timewasters." I'll just add a data point by saying that this isn't my experience. In my experience the ladies who contact me are much, much more likely to be genuinely interested. I would agree that it probably makes sense for ladies to initiate contact - because the male/female ratio means it's more likely to result in something the lady in question actually wants. But I'm not going to speak to whether women are usually doing that or not - that's outside my wheelhouse | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn’t say single women on here are lazy because I’ve had a few directly reach out to me unexpectedly on a number of occasions and I’m able to meet/connect with plenty when I attend clubs and parties. Biology and old fashioned societal values demonstrate that some women prefer to be the chasee as opposed to the chaser and this site fully perpetuates that. The lack of interaction and engagement (from some) also does to tend harbour a level of resentment to a certain degree from unsuccessful chasers. Great reply, thanks why was it unexpected for them to reach out ? I was surprised that my profile had caught someone’s attention whenever a woman/couple message first, I always ask them specifically what stood out about my profile? They have 100’s to choose from so why me? Kinda to see if they’ve actually read my profile because l like to think it covers quite a lot That’s fair enough and shows your really approaching it in the right way so fair play to you " I believe it’s a simple case of getting out what I’ve put in over time and coming on here with reasonable expectations | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have to disagree, we get fabs from women and 1st messages too. I don't think many rely on their overflowing inbox from our experience and meets they've actively engaged with us equally. Mrs " This. Since becoming a single again I've noticed messages, winks and fabs from single women. They're not lazy. They just use the site more sensibly than many men and couples and don't go for a scattergun approach. They're more selective in who they engage with. Which quite frankly is how everyone should operate on here. A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? If a woman Fabs a pic the person tends to think she will guarantee a fuck with them. Same for any interaction. If I message first then decide they're not for me they often get annoyed. "Why did you message me if you won't fuck me??!!" Many men have shit profiles. Look through hundreds to find one with decent text and no cock pics. However when I'm arranging a fantasy scenario I always go looking for someone specific. Works great. Shit profiles aren’t just on men trust me some couples and women have pretty awful profiles " I do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m just head to read the comments " Hahaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem I find us alot of them have zero patience and can't see the sarcasm. Likely from there experience on here. The amount of attention some get on here who frankly wouldn't get any attention offline certainly goes to a few to many heads " Great attitude, I’m sure it will take you far on fab! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem I find us alot of them have zero patience and can't see the sarcasm. Likely from there experience on here. The amount of attention some get on here who frankly wouldn't get any attention offline certainly goes to a few to many heads Great attitude, I’m sure it will take you far on fab!" Exactly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t think women are lazy on fab, they just don’t need to make as much effort to get laid. Supply and demand." Indeed. I watched an interesting video on YouTube modelling dating apps and showing how the skewed ratio coupled with the way they work means almost no one gets what they want. I'm not sure if you're allowed to post YouTube links in here but the title is why men get so few matches on dating apps. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t think it is fair to generalise- I’ve met some lovely single women on here. I guess it is a bit of “ luck of the draw” as quite clearly single women get bombarded by men and not all of it is very nice " It’s a questioned based around ours and people we have spoke too experience so not exactly a generalisation as such, theres a whole lot of comments above that confirm that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Most single ladies get alot of messages and like us, most just attend clubs. Clubs are the best way to meet people. Don't have to deal with time wasters, no ping pong messaging for months on end. Just attend and chat to loads of lovely people. " Clubs are clearly a big part of the scene but not the be all and end all, I for one aren’t keen on them at all I find them quiet clicky and boring at times, everyone has their own ways of doing it I guess | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pillow princess here " Hahaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem I find us alot of them have zero patience and can't see the sarcasm. Likely from there experience on here. The amount of attention some get on here who frankly wouldn't get any attention offline certainly goes to a few to many heads Great attitude, I’m sure it will take you far on fab!" Ive done pretty well on here over the years. I say it how I see it and I'm not taking about everyone. Don't think I'm saying there's not some lovely women on here or just women overwhelmed. But also some massively stuck up women who would not get any attention at a bar. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem I find us alot of them have zero patience and can't see the sarcasm. Likely from there experience on here. The amount of attention some get on here who frankly wouldn't get any attention offline certainly goes to a few to many heads Great attitude, I’m sure it will take you far on fab! Ive done pretty well on here over the years. I say it how I see it and I'm not taking about everyone. Don't think I'm saying there's not some lovely women on here or just women overwhelmed. But also some massively stuck up women who would not get any attention at a bar. And why do you think they wouldn’t get attention at a bar? What a shallow statement to make " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem I find us alot of them have zero patience and can't see the sarcasm. Likely from there experience on here. The amount of attention some get on here who frankly wouldn't get any attention offline certainly goes to a few to many heads Great attitude, I’m sure it will take you far on fab! Ive done pretty well on here over the years. I say it how I see it and I'm not taking about everyone. Don't think I'm saying there's not some lovely women on here or just women overwhelmed. But also some massively stuck up women who would not get any attention at a bar. And why do you think they wouldn’t get attention at a bar? What a shallow statement to make " Shallow, how? Okay any or little attention. Im just pointing out those who don't look after themselves go about slagging men off or calling men out on here. Generally being stuck up. I don't see that in real life. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem I find us alot of them have zero patience and can't see the sarcasm. Likely from there experience on here. The amount of attention some get on here who frankly wouldn't get any attention offline certainly goes to a few to many heads Great attitude, I’m sure it will take you far on fab! Ive done pretty well on here over the years. I say it how I see it and I'm not taking about everyone. Don't think I'm saying there's not some lovely women on here or just women overwhelmed. But also some massively stuck up women who would not get any attention at a bar. And why do you think they wouldn’t get attention at a bar? What a shallow statement to make Shallow, how? Okay any or little attention. Im just pointing out those who don't look after themselves go about slagging men off or calling men out on here. Generally being stuck up. I don't see that in real life. " Sorry but how do you they don’t look after themselves? Shallow because you are going on about how someone looks and that decides the attention they would get in a bar. I’d rather speak to someone who was funny than who was maybe less personally attractive to me That’s very shallow.. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and everyone has different tastes. Just because you say you like to say it how it doesn’t give you the right to mean about others. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The problem I find us alot of them have zero patience and can't see the sarcasm. Likely from there experience on here. The amount of attention some get on here who frankly wouldn't get any attention offline certainly goes to a few to many heads Great attitude, I’m sure it will take you far on fab! Ive done pretty well on here over the years. I say it how I see it and I'm not taking about everyone. Don't think I'm saying there's not some lovely women on here or just women overwhelmed. But also some massively stuck up women who would not get any attention at a bar. And why do you think they wouldn’t get attention at a bar? What a shallow statement to make Shallow, how? Okay any or little attention. Im just pointing out those who don't look after themselves go about slagging men off or calling men out on here. Generally being stuck up. I don't see that in real life. Sorry but how do you they don’t look after themselves? Shallow because you are going on about how someone looks and that decides the attention they would get in a bar. I’d rather speak to someone who was funny than who was maybe less personally attractive to me That’s very shallow.. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and everyone has different tastes. Just because you say you like to say it how it doesn’t give you the right to mean about others. " Schroedinger’s woman, simultaneously someone a man wants to fuck and also a fat slag who doesn’t look after herself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I used to message single guys. But similar to vanilla world if I'm the one doing the 'chasing' the guys aren't particularly interested! I'd rather engage with a guy who's messaged me first, at least that way I know they're interested in me! " What if men did the same though ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I used to message single guys. But similar to vanilla world if I'm the one doing the 'chasing' the guys aren't particularly interested! I'd rather engage with a guy who's messaged me first, at least that way I know they're interested in me! " I don't think anyone should be chasing. Vanilla world or Fab. It should always be 100% mutual effort. Of course one has to make the first move, but once interest/attraction has been generated at some level then it's the responsibility of both parties to put the same time, effort and energy in. That goes whether you're a single woman perceived as being in high demand or a single guy seen as less so. It's just about two people. Neither is more important than the other. Both are equal in any 'relationship' whether just for casual meets, regular or anything more. Any inequality between the two just puts one on a pedestal and requires the other to do the chasing. And that isn't a beneficial situation for anyone. A | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have to disagree, we get fabs from women and 1st messages too. I don't think many rely on their overflowing inbox from our experience and meets they've actively engaged with us equally. Mrs " Same, lots of single women message first including myself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So to summarise Fabs broken ! " I wouldn’t say that, it’s making the assumption that a) there is one correct way to use fab, in reality there are as many ways to se fab as there are users. And b) fab is a utopia of fairness. Some people come to fab and think all they have to do is wave their dick about and a thousand horny women are going to jump on it. They fail to realise that fab is it’s own economy. To generalise a little you could say that men are the product and women are the consumers. There are a lot more products than consumers, so as in any economy the products have to compete for the attention of the consumers, this in turn gives the consumer all the power. The consumer gets to pick and choose, they set their rules and use fab as they see fit. Good products will get more attention, which in turn gives them the power, and they can become too expensive for some of the consumers. So they get to set their own rules and use fab as they see fit. Sadly, most of the products are condemned to rot where they sit, or whither on the vine, unless they change the way they advertise themselves, and so they create different ways to use fab. Those products who do not get selected by consumers, and never change will never have success. Fab is essentially capitalism, and a microcosm of our society, with one major difference, the women have far more power here. Sadly, there are some men who don’t like this and react badly, lots complaining on forums but others being abusive by private messaging. Fab isn’t broken, it’s just different to what people have grown used to, and that is very difficult for some to take. The man who says he wouldn’t look at a particular woman in a bar is now vying for her attention, and most of the time she has better offers, that doesn’t go down well. It’s the same for couples, who are somewhere in the middle. We couples largely have to do the chasing with the ‘powerful’ women and follow their rules, whereas we can afford to be picky with the men as, in the fab economy, they are weak and ten a penny, so we set the rules. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I used to message single guys. But similar to vanilla world if I'm the one doing the 'chasing' the guys aren't particularly interested! I'd rather engage with a guy who's messaged me first, at least that way I know they're interested in me! " Like most things in life if it is not worth work for than it is not worth having. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So to summarise Fabs broken ! I wouldn’t say that, it’s making the assumption that a) there is one correct way to use fab, in reality there are as many ways to se fab as there are users. And b) fab is a utopia of fairness. Some people come to fab and think all they have to do is wave their dick about and a thousand horny women are going to jump on it. They fail to realise that fab is it’s own economy. To generalise a little you could say that men are the product and women are the consumers. There are a lot more products than consumers, so as in any economy the products have to compete for the attention of the consumers, this in turn gives the consumer all the power. The consumer gets to pick and choose, they set their rules and use fab as they see fit. Good products will get more attention, which in turn gives them the power, and they can become too expensive for some of the consumers. So they get to set their own rules and use fab as they see fit. Sadly, most of the products are condemned to rot where they sit, or whither on the vine, unless they change the way they advertise themselves, and so they create different ways to use fab. Those products who do not get selected by consumers, and never change will never have success. Fab is essentially capitalism, and a microcosm of our society, with one major difference, the women have far more power here. Sadly, there are some men who don’t like this and react badly, lots complaining on forums but others being abusive by private messaging. Fab isn’t broken, it’s just different to what people have grown used to, and that is very difficult for some to take. The man who says he wouldn’t look at a particular woman in a bar is now vying for her attention, and most of the time she has better offers, that doesn’t go down well. It’s the same for couples, who are somewhere in the middle. We couples largely have to do the chasing with the ‘powerful’ women and follow their rules, whereas we can afford to be picky with the men as, in the fab economy, they are weak and ten a penny, so we set the rules." Thanks for such an eloquent response, that’s a great description of the way fab is currently and a brilliant likening. That said it misses my point of my original question maybe I am expecting too much from a online world where little respect is paid by some section of all groups, Fab can set its rules, people can act as they so see fit, that doesn’t make it right but hey such is life I am sure if we all just rolled over and tickled each others belly’s swinging would be so much better | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So to summarise Fabs broken ! I wouldn’t say that, it’s making the assumption that a) there is one correct way to use fab, in reality there are as many ways to se fab as there are users. And b) fab is a utopia of fairness. Some people come to fab and think all they have to do is wave their dick about and a thousand horny women are going to jump on it. They fail to realise that fab is it’s own economy. To generalise a little you could say that men are the product and women are the consumers. There are a lot more products than consumers, so as in any economy the products have to compete for the attention of the consumers, this in turn gives the consumer all the power. The consumer gets to pick and choose, they set their rules and use fab as they see fit. Good products will get more attention, which in turn gives them the power, and they can become too expensive for some of the consumers. So they get to set their own rules and use fab as they see fit. Sadly, most of the products are condemned to rot where they sit, or whither on the vine, unless they change the way they advertise themselves, and so they create different ways to use fab. Those products who do not get selected by consumers, and never change will never have success. Fab is essentially capitalism, and a microcosm of our society, with one major difference, the women have far more power here. Sadly, there are some men who don’t like this and react badly, lots complaining on forums but others being abusive by private messaging. Fab isn’t broken, it’s just different to what people have grown used to, and that is very difficult for some to take. The man who says he wouldn’t look at a particular woman in a bar is now vying for her attention, and most of the time she has better offers, that doesn’t go down well. It’s the same for couples, who are somewhere in the middle. We couples largely have to do the chasing with the ‘powerful’ women and follow their rules, whereas we can afford to be picky with the men as, in the fab economy, they are weak and ten a penny, so we set the rules. Thanks for such an eloquent response, that’s a great description of the way fab is currently and a brilliant likening. That said it misses my point of my original question maybe I am expecting too much from a online world where little respect is paid by some section of all groups, Fab can set its rules, people can act as they so see fit, that doesn’t make it right but hey such is life I am sure if we all just rolled over and tickled each others belly’s swinging would be so much better " I think the only way to enjoy fab is to see it for what it is, and adjust your expectations accordingly. Men who get pissy because they are turned down by a woman they wouldn’t look at inns bar should probably just go out to a bar when they want to get laid. Or, alternatively, reflect on why they, as a single male, is on fab trying to attract the attention of women, rather than going to a bar and doing it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So to summarise Fabs broken ! I wouldn’t say that, it’s making the assumption that a) there is one correct way to use fab, in reality there are as many ways to se fab as there are users. And b) fab is a utopia of fairness. Some people come to fab and think all they have to do is wave their dick about and a thousand horny women are going to jump on it. They fail to realise that fab is it’s own economy. To generalise a little you could say that men are the product and women are the consumers. There are a lot more products than consumers, so as in any economy the products have to compete for the attention of the consumers, this in turn gives the consumer all the power. The consumer gets to pick and choose, they set their rules and use fab as they see fit. Good products will get more attention, which in turn gives them the power, and they can become too expensive for some of the consumers. So they get to set their own rules and use fab as they see fit. Sadly, most of the products are condemned to rot where they sit, or whither on the vine, unless they change the way they advertise themselves, and so they create different ways to use fab. Those products who do not get selected by consumers, and never change will never have success. Fab is essentially capitalism, and a microcosm of our society, with one major difference, the women have far more power here. Sadly, there are some men who don’t like this and react badly, lots complaining on forums but others being abusive by private messaging. Fab isn’t broken, it’s just different to what people have grown used to, and that is very difficult for some to take. The man who says he wouldn’t look at a particular woman in a bar is now vying for her attention, and most of the time she has better offers, that doesn’t go down well. It’s the same for couples, who are somewhere in the middle. We couples largely have to do the chasing with the ‘powerful’ women and follow their rules, whereas we can afford to be picky with the men as, in the fab economy, they are weak and ten a penny, so we set the rules. Thanks for such an eloquent response, that’s a great description of the way fab is currently and a brilliant likening. That said it misses my point of my original question maybe I am expecting too much from a online world where little respect is paid by some section of all groups, Fab can set its rules, people can act as they so see fit, that doesn’t make it right but hey such is life I am sure if we all just rolled over and tickled each others belly’s swinging would be so much better I think the only way to enjoy fab is to see it for what it is, and adjust your expectations accordingly. Men who get pissy because they are turned down by a woman they wouldn’t look at inns bar should probably just go out to a bar when they want to get laid. Or, alternatively, reflect on why they, as a single male, is on fab trying to attract the attention of women, rather than going to a bar and doing it." That guys who I may add was pretty disrespectful has really pissed you off mind, I’d not let it bother you like you say in your description of fab as it is, it is what it is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So to summarise Fabs broken ! I wouldn’t say that, it’s making the assumption that a) there is one correct way to use fab, in reality there are as many ways to se fab as there are users. And b) fab is a utopia of fairness. Some people come to fab and think all they have to do is wave their dick about and a thousand horny women are going to jump on it. They fail to realise that fab is it’s own economy. To generalise a little you could say that men are the product and women are the consumers. There are a lot more products than consumers, so as in any economy the products have to compete for the attention of the consumers, this in turn gives the consumer all the power. The consumer gets to pick and choose, they set their rules and use fab as they see fit. Good products will get more attention, which in turn gives them the power, and they can become too expensive for some of the consumers. So they get to set their own rules and use fab as they see fit. Sadly, most of the products are condemned to rot where they sit, or whither on the vine, unless they change the way they advertise themselves, and so they create different ways to use fab. Those products who do not get selected by consumers, and never change will never have success. Fab is essentially capitalism, and a microcosm of our society, with one major difference, the women have far more power here. Sadly, there are some men who don’t like this and react badly, lots complaining on forums but others being abusive by private messaging. Fab isn’t broken, it’s just different to what people have grown used to, and that is very difficult for some to take. The man who says he wouldn’t look at a particular woman in a bar is now vying for her attention, and most of the time she has better offers, that doesn’t go down well. It’s the same for couples, who are somewhere in the middle. We couples largely have to do the chasing with the ‘powerful’ women and follow their rules, whereas we can afford to be picky with the men as, in the fab economy, they are weak and ten a penny, so we set the rules. Thanks for such an eloquent response, that’s a great description of the way fab is currently and a brilliant likening. That said it misses my point of my original question maybe I am expecting too much from a online world where little respect is paid by some section of all groups, Fab can set its rules, people can act as they so see fit, that doesn’t make it right but hey such is life I am sure if we all just rolled over and tickled each others belly’s swinging would be so much better I think the only way to enjoy fab is to see it for what it is, and adjust your expectations accordingly. Men who get pissy because they are turned down by a woman they wouldn’t look at inns bar should probably just go out to a bar when they want to get laid. Or, alternatively, reflect on why they, as a single male, is on fab trying to attract the attention of women, rather than going to a bar and doing it. That guys who I may add was pretty disrespectful has really pissed you off mind, I’d not let it bother you like you say in your description of fab as it is, it is what it is " I’m using that as an example, the fora are full of misogynistic bullshit like that, and that just happens to be on this thread. Ultimately more to be pitied than hated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So to summarise Fabs broken ! I wouldn’t say that, it’s making the assumption that a) there is one correct way to use fab, in reality there are as many ways to se fab as there are users. And b) fab is a utopia of fairness. Some people come to fab and think all they have to do is wave their dick about and a thousand horny women are going to jump on it. They fail to realise that fab is it’s own economy. To generalise a little you could say that men are the product and women are the consumers. There are a lot more products than consumers, so as in any economy the products have to compete for the attention of the consumers, this in turn gives the consumer all the power. The consumer gets to pick and choose, they set their rules and use fab as they see fit. Good products will get more attention, which in turn gives them the power, and they can become too expensive for some of the consumers. So they get to set their own rules and use fab as they see fit. Sadly, most of the products are condemned to rot where they sit, or whither on the vine, unless they change the way they advertise themselves, and so they create different ways to use fab. Those products who do not get selected by consumers, and never change will never have success. Fab is essentially capitalism, and a microcosm of our society, with one major difference, the women have far more power here. Sadly, there are some men who don’t like this and react badly, lots complaining on forums but others being abusive by private messaging. Fab isn’t broken, it’s just different to what people have grown used to, and that is very difficult for some to take. The man who says he wouldn’t look at a particular woman in a bar is now vying for her attention, and most of the time she has better offers, that doesn’t go down well. It’s the same for couples, who are somewhere in the middle. We couples largely have to do the chasing with the ‘powerful’ women and follow their rules, whereas we can afford to be picky with the men as, in the fab economy, they are weak and ten a penny, so we set the rules. Thanks for such an eloquent response, that’s a great description of the way fab is currently and a brilliant likening. That said it misses my point of my original question maybe I am expecting too much from a online world where little respect is paid by some section of all groups, Fab can set its rules, people can act as they so see fit, that doesn’t make it right but hey such is life I am sure if we all just rolled over and tickled each others belly’s swinging would be so much better I think the only way to enjoy fab is to see it for what it is, and adjust your expectations accordingly. Men who get pissy because they are turned down by a woman they wouldn’t look at inns bar should probably just go out to a bar when they want to get laid. Or, alternatively, reflect on why they, as a single male, is on fab trying to attract the attention of women, rather than going to a bar and doing it. That guys who I may add was pretty disrespectful has really pissed you off mind, I’d not let it bother you like you say in your description of fab as it is, it is what it is I’m using that as an example, the fora are full of misogynistic bullshit like that, and that just happens to be on this thread. Ultimately more to be pitied than hated." Unfortunately I’d have to agree but hence why it works the other way also and why men, couples and women could equally be as miffed by what could potentially be seen as ignorance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I used to message single guys. But similar to vanilla world if I'm the one doing the 'chasing' the guys aren't particularly interested! I'd rather engage with a guy who's messaged me first, at least that way I know they're interested in me! What if men did the same though ? " Good point! And I guess at that stage I would be forced to change tactics accordingly. For now this way seems to be working | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I used to message single guys. But similar to vanilla world if I'm the one doing the 'chasing' the guys aren't particularly interested! I'd rather engage with a guy who's messaged me first, at least that way I know they're interested in me! What if men did the same though ? Good point! And I guess at that stage I would be forced to change tactics accordingly. For now this way seems to be working " Good luck with the tactics and I hope there isn’t a fab revolute that would inspire a change of thinking | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So to summarise Fabs broken ! " I like Fab, I think it works pretty well to be fair. It’s a social tool for me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Having been a single lady and in a couple I can honestly say I never ever had to message anyone to meet as a single lady That’s not me blowing smoke up my arse haha that is just how it is for most if not all single ladies on here We do not get anywhere near as many messages as a couple compared to single So yes, I was a pretty lazy fabber as a solo lol " You are gorgeous . Ms | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ?" Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with" Who says they don’t well from our experience of Fab and speaking to other people on Fab aside from SF those people, we’ve also spoken to numerous single females themselves that admit it, in-fact most single females commenting on here admit to it but give arguments as to why. So that’s who would say they don’t. Who would fab be better for ? Everyone is think including single women. And fair play for searching yourself your a credit to site and should be applauded for approaching it in the right manner in our opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Having been a single lady and in a couple I can honestly say I never ever had to message anyone to meet as a single lady That’s not me blowing smoke up my arse haha that is just how it is for most if not all single ladies on here We do not get anywhere near as many messages as a couple compared to single So yes, I was a pretty lazy fabber as a solo lol You are gorgeous . Ms" Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with Who says they don’t well from our experience of Fab and speaking to other people on Fab aside from SF those people, we’ve also spoken to numerous single females themselves that admit it, in-fact most single females commenting on here admit to it but give arguments as to why. So that’s who would say they don’t. Who would fab be better for ? Everyone is think including single women. And fair play for searching yourself your a credit to site and should be applauded for approaching it in the right manner in our opinion " To the extent I engage with anyone new, I *do* start all contact myself. All of it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with Who says they don’t well from our experience of Fab and speaking to other people on Fab aside from SF those people, we’ve also spoken to numerous single females themselves that admit it, in-fact most single females commenting on here admit to it but give arguments as to why. So that’s who would say they don’t. Who would fab be better for ? Everyone is think including single women. And fair play for searching yourself your a credit to site and should be applauded for approaching it in the right manner in our opinion To the extent I engage with anyone new, I *do* start all contact myself. All of it." That’s great and fair play in our opinion that’s the best way to do it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With far fewer women here than men, if we all picked our favourites to message, it would still seem like men don't get contacted - probably a similar dynamic for women contacting couples. Ultimately, if the only people who aren't satisfied with the status quo are those who complain, then it may well be that the others have things under their control, the way that they prefer it to be. " I’d say the complaining on the status updates/forums is fair equal so not necessarily, the question wasn’t posted based on male opinion alone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with Who says they don’t well from our experience of Fab and speaking to other people on Fab aside from SF those people, we’ve also spoken to numerous single females themselves that admit it, in-fact most single females commenting on here admit to it but give arguments as to why. So that’s who would say they don’t. Who would fab be better for ? Everyone is think including single women. And fair play for searching yourself your a credit to site and should be applauded for approaching it in the right manner in our opinion To the extent I engage with anyone new, I *do* start all contact myself. All of it. That’s great and fair play in our opinion that’s the best way to do it " I find it close to fruitless, because I contact almost no one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with Who says they don’t well from our experience of Fab and speaking to other people on Fab aside from SF those people, we’ve also spoken to numerous single females themselves that admit it, in-fact most single females commenting on here admit to it but give arguments as to why. So that’s who would say they don’t. Who would fab be better for ? Everyone is think including single women. And fair play for searching yourself your a credit to site and should be applauded for approaching it in the right manner in our opinion To the extent I engage with anyone new, I *do* start all contact myself. All of it. That’s great and fair play in our opinion that’s the best way to do it I find it close to fruitless, because I contact almost no one." I am lost here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"if we all just rolled over and tickled each others belly’s swinging would be so much better " Can I vote this approach up please? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with Who says they don’t well from our experience of Fab and speaking to other people on Fab aside from SF those people, we’ve also spoken to numerous single females themselves that admit it, in-fact most single females commenting on here admit to it but give arguments as to why. So that’s who would say they don’t. Who would fab be better for ? Everyone is think including single women. And fair play for searching yourself your a credit to site and should be applauded for approaching it in the right manner in our opinion To the extent I engage with anyone new, I *do* start all contact myself. All of it. That’s great and fair play in our opinion that’s the best way to do it I find it close to fruitless, because I contact almost no one. I am lost here " - you think women are lazy because we don't initiate contact - I do start contact - you say, good job, that's the way it ought to be - I say, well, it kind of sucks for me, because I rarely find anyone I want to contact | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ?" Most single fems are here for the online attention, rarely any meet and those that are genuine will meet at clubs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Who would fab be better for if SF did this? And who says they don't. I go searching, I rarely find a profile I want to engage with Who says they don’t well from our experience of Fab and speaking to other people on Fab aside from SF those people, we’ve also spoken to numerous single females themselves that admit it, in-fact most single females commenting on here admit to it but give arguments as to why. So that’s who would say they don’t. Who would fab be better for ? Everyone is think including single women. And fair play for searching yourself your a credit to site and should be applauded for approaching it in the right manner in our opinion To the extent I engage with anyone new, I *do* start all contact myself. All of it. That’s great and fair play in our opinion that’s the best way to do it I find it close to fruitless, because I contact almost no one. I am lost here - you think women are lazy because we don't initiate contact - I do start contact - you say, good job, that's the way it ought to be - I say, well, it kind of sucks for me, because I rarely find anyone I want to contact" That’s a shame really sorry to hear that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Most single fems are here for the online attention, rarely any meet and those that are genuine will meet at clubs " So because I don't like clubs I'm not genuine that's obviously another of my floors then explains a lot | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Before we get a barrage of hate, hear us out. Would Fab be better if more single females took time to search for people rather than relying on their bulging inbox’s, from our experiences as singles and as a couple on here and discussing it with people we’ve met on Fab, women don’t exactly engage with the process as a whole, very rarely will you get a message first from a single lady, very rarely a fab on a pic, very rarely anything really unless you attempt to engage with them first, we understand women can get fixated on their bulging inbox but by doing such are they missing out on potentially amazing meets and people ? Most single fems are here for the online attention, rarely any meet and those that are genuine will meet at clubs " Don't worry, I've set my profile up to minimise attention too If anyone cares that I've got brown hair, then hey, more power to them. Everything else is friends/ private. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP about 17 different women have said we actively search and make/have made first contact. A couple of those have said it’s very hard to find someone they want like, but they’re still putting in the effort. Hardly lazy. 3 or 4 others have commented but not said either way - or stated they used to but got sick of all the crap. It feels like you’ve put a generalised statement out there (fair play, it’s created debate), been given examples that disprove it but you’re still determined to see it your way. It’s also starting to feel a little like you’re telling us how to use the site - we should be replying to all messages or we aren’t respectful and should be contacting more people. A broader way to make the site better, to use your word, would be for users to read profiles, contact people they may actually match with and free everyone up to spend time talking to those they may connect with instead of becoming jaded. " It does feel like "I wish more women would contact us" Fair play, people are allowed to wish that people would contact them. But there are reasons why people don't, and the only thing you can change is what you do yourself. (I've turned my filters as high as they go, for example. I get way less hassle. It's brilliant) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP about 17 different women have said we actively search and make/have made first contact. A couple of those have said it’s very hard to find someone they want like, but they’re still putting in the effort. Hardly lazy. 3 or 4 others have commented but not said either way - or stated they used to but got sick of all the crap. It feels like you’ve put a generalised statement out there (fair play, it’s created debate), been given examples that disprove it but you’re still determined to see it your way. It’s also starting to feel a little like you’re telling us how to use the site - we should be replying to all messages or we aren’t respectful and should be contacting more people. A broader way to make the site better, to use your word, would be for users to read profiles, contact people they may actually match with and free everyone up to spend time talking to those they may connect with instead of becoming jaded. " Exactly Even if women did most of the messaging we still wouldn't contact someone who we aren't interested in | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP about 17 different women have said we actively search and make/have made first contact. A couple of those have said it’s very hard to find someone they want like, but they’re still putting in the effort. Hardly lazy. 3 or 4 others have commented but not said either way - or stated they used to but got sick of all the crap. It feels like you’ve put a generalised statement out there (fair play, it’s created debate), been given examples that disprove it but you’re still determined to see it your way. It’s also starting to feel a little like you’re telling us how to use the site - we should be replying to all messages or we aren’t respectful and should be contacting more people. A broader way to make the site better, to use your word, would be for users to read profiles, contact people they may actually match with and free everyone up to spend time talking to those they may connect with instead of becoming jaded. " Was this aimed at us ? Before I reply to each point | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP about 17 different women have said we actively search and make/have made first contact. A couple of those have said it’s very hard to find someone they want like, but they’re still putting in the effort. Hardly lazy. 3 or 4 others have commented but not said either way - or stated they used to but got sick of all the crap. It feels like you’ve put a generalised statement out there (fair play, it’s created debate), been given examples that disprove it but you’re still determined to see it your way. It’s also starting to feel a little like you’re telling us how to use the site - we should be replying to all messages or we aren’t respectful and should be contacting more people. A broader way to make the site better, to use your word, would be for users to read profiles, contact people they may actually match with and free everyone up to spend time talking to those they may connect with instead of becoming jaded. " 21 women being defensive over the populous is hardly a reflection on the whole site just as our “question” we posed based on our personal experiences and the handful of couples and single females we’ve spoken too isn’t. We didn’t pose a statement it was a question based on our experience so therefore wasn’t generalised in anyway as our experience isn’t gospel, yeah it’s caused lively debate and in the main aside from one pretty disrespectful comment I’ve actually enjoyed the back and forth. At no point have we told anyone to do that we’ve gave no directive to any individual just simply said what we feel is right within our own approach, we certainly aren’t preaching to anyone it’s our opinion to you that may be worthless to some it may not but just because it’s maybe different to your opinion doesn’t devalue it. Either way no regrets in anything we’ve said or any question we asked that started this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP about 17 different women have said we actively search and make/have made first contact. A couple of those have said it’s very hard to find someone they want like, but they’re still putting in the effort. Hardly lazy. 3 or 4 others have commented but not said either way - or stated they used to but got sick of all the crap. It feels like you’ve put a generalised statement out there (fair play, it’s created debate), been given examples that disprove it but you’re still determined to see it your way. It’s also starting to feel a little like you’re telling us how to use the site - we should be replying to all messages or we aren’t respectful and should be contacting more people. A broader way to make the site better, to use your word, would be for users to read profiles, contact people they may actually match with and free everyone up to spend time talking to those they may connect with instead of becoming jaded. " Exactly this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP about 17 different women have said we actively search and make/have made first contact. A couple of those have said it’s very hard to find someone they want like, but they’re still putting in the effort. Hardly lazy. 3 or 4 others have commented but not said either way - or stated they used to but got sick of all the crap. It feels like you’ve put a generalised statement out there (fair play, it’s created debate), been given examples that disprove it but you’re still determined to see it your way. It’s also starting to feel a little like you’re telling us how to use the site - we should be replying to all messages or we aren’t respectful and should be contacting more people. A broader way to make the site better, to use your word, would be for users to read profiles, contact people they may actually match with and free everyone up to spend time talking to those they may connect with instead of becoming jaded. 21 women being defensive over the populous is hardly a reflection on the whole site just as our “question” we posed based on our personal experiences and the handful of couples and single females we’ve spoken too isn’t. We didn’t pose a statement it was a question based on our experience so therefore wasn’t generalised in anyway as our experience isn’t gospel, yeah it’s caused lively debate and in the main aside from one pretty disrespectful comment I’ve actually enjoyed the back and forth. At no point have we told anyone to do that we’ve gave no directive to any individual just simply said what we feel is right within our own approach, we certainly aren’t preaching to anyone it’s our opinion to you that may be worthless to some it may not but just because it’s maybe different to your opinion doesn’t devalue it. Either way no regrets in anything we’ve said or any question we asked that started this thread " So your opinion is valid and should be considered, but several women's perspective is not, or not representative? Ok. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP about 17 different women have said we actively search and make/have made first contact. A couple of those have said it’s very hard to find someone they want like, but they’re still putting in the effort. Hardly lazy. 3 or 4 others have commented but not said either way - or stated they used to but got sick of all the crap. It feels like you’ve put a generalised statement out there (fair play, it’s created debate), been given examples that disprove it but you’re still determined to see it your way. It’s also starting to feel a little like you’re telling us how to use the site - we should be replying to all messages or we aren’t respectful and should be contacting more people. A broader way to make the site better, to use your word, would be for users to read profiles, contact people they may actually match with and free everyone up to spend time talking to those they may connect with instead of becoming jaded. 21 women being defensive over the populous is hardly a reflection on the whole site just as our “question” we posed based on our personal experiences and the handful of couples and single females we’ve spoken too isn’t. We didn’t pose a statement it was a question based on our experience so therefore wasn’t generalised in anyway as our experience isn’t gospel, yeah it’s caused lively debate and in the main aside from one pretty disrespectful comment I’ve actually enjoyed the back and forth. At no point have we told anyone to do that we’ve gave no directive to any individual just simply said what we feel is right within our own approach, we certainly aren’t preaching to anyone it’s our opinion to you that may be worthless to some it may not but just because it’s maybe different to your opinion doesn’t devalue it. Either way no regrets in anything we’ve said or any question we asked that started this thread So your opinion is valid and should be considered, but several women's perspective is not, or not representative? Ok." I am sorry but you’re clearly not reading what we are saying. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" 21 women being defensive over the populous is hardly a reflection on the whole site " Sorry, I got distracted laughing at this. I’m definitely not devaluing it. But I’m finding it ironic that differing opinions are batted off ats defensive and devaluing yours when you’ve asked if women generally on fab are lazy, based on never messaging first, and several have replied that they do. But good thread OP. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" 21 women being defensive over the populous is hardly a reflection on the whole site Sorry, I got distracted laughing at this. I’m definitely not devaluing it. But I’m finding it ironic that differing opinions are batted off ats defensive and devaluing yours when you’ve asked if women generally on fab are lazy, based on never messaging first, and several have replied that they do. But good thread OP. " keep well and happy fabbing, I look forward to winning more lively debates against yourself, it’s been fun | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |