FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > what came first....
what came first....
Jump to: Newest in thread
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The egg.
Based on the assumption that the definition of a chicken was defined after the hatching of an egg.
In order to create the first "chicken" two animals mated and thus an egg produced.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It has been proven that it was the chicken.
The egg came later, the egg was developed by calcium and other natural minerals building around the unborn etc to protect the young during the time the chicken carried their offspring. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The egg.
Based on the assumption that the definition of a chicken was defined after the hatching of an egg.
In order to create the first "chicken" two animals mated and thus an egg produced.
"
Really...? Mmmmmm...sounds a bit quick to me... Chicken dna is pretty fkn pure, almost perfect...you don't NEED two animlals to mate in order for evolution to happen, but yeah still the egg! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
depends on whether you class the species that evolved into chickens as a form of chicken or are you talking modern day chickens which have been bred/manipulated to be as they are now? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"depends on whether you class the species that evolved into chickens as a form of chicken or are you talking modern day chickens which have been bred/manipulated to be as they are now?"
Dna's the same, so species should remain the same also!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"depends on whether you class the species that evolved into chickens as a form of chicken or are you talking modern day chickens which have been bred/manipulated to be as they are now?
Dna's the same, so species should remain the same also!
"
Not always,DNA changes slightly with evolution/inter species breeding,otherwise 99% of the bird species would still be called dinosaurs,what DNA does a Tiglon or Liger posses? and both are fertile unlike an Ass |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"depends on whether you class the species that evolved into chickens as a form of chicken or are you talking modern day chickens which have been bred/manipulated to be as they are now?
Dna's the same, so species should remain the same also!
Not always,DNA changes slightly with evolution/inter species breeding,otherwise 99% of the bird species would still be called dinosaurs,what DNA does a Tiglon or Liger posses? and both are fertile unlike an Ass"
DNA of liger and other attempts to create new species is altered and mutated by man, copied and reproduced by man, does not interest me at all...copies of life tend not to stand the test of time!
DNA may change slightly through evolution, but chickens as far as i'm aware has the strongest dna because it did not need to evolve as often, it was near perfect, so yeah all the same..just diluted version! Like the rest of us! Lol! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"depends on whether you class the species that evolved into chickens as a form of chicken or are you talking modern day chickens which have been bred/manipulated to be as they are now?
Dna's the same, so species should remain the same also!
Not always,DNA changes slightly with evolution/inter species breeding,otherwise 99% of the bird species would still be called dinosaurs,what DNA does a Tiglon or Liger posses? and both are fertile unlike an Ass
DNA of liger and other attempts to create new species is altered and mutated by man, copied and reproduced by man, does not interest me at all...copies of life tend not to stand the test of time!
DNA may change slightly through evolution, but chickens as far as i'm aware has the strongest dna because it did not need to evolve as often, it was near perfect, so yeah all the same..just diluted version! Like the rest of us! Lol! "
I would agree but we as a species have manipulated every animal we farm/use,or we use animals that natural selection has produced,even the simple chicken isn't a "pure" breed:-if they were they would still have the teeth that their ancestors had(scientists actually turned on that part of the DNA in 2006!)but as to original question the egg was probably laid by one species ans a chicken emerged due to some kind of inter species breeding |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
In the end you need a chicken to lay an egg to make chick who turns into a chicken correct?
So the chicken must come from somewhere an I will be very supprised if a T Rex had a dump an a chicken popped out |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
As said where a literal chicken and dig scenario are concerned the eg came first as it was the product of evolution there was a point where the breed having the egg was not chicken x
however the question is a metaphor refering to life its self in this case the life form came first as the first life forms divide not blend their genetic data which is in essence the egg . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Blah, blah, blah
So its still the fkn egg then?? "
depends:-are we 100% sure that the species millions years ago wasn't viviparous,after all some animals change from male to female to suit the conditions so who knows whether things got so extreme that they may have evolved to lay eggs rather than bear live young |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The BIG question I want to ask is....
What came first, the chicken or the egg? "
British scientists spent a fortune on finding the answer for this, they said....... the chicken as to have an egg you would need the ovaries of the chicken, google it lol
x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The BIG question I want to ask is....
What came first, the chicken or the egg?
British scientists spent a fortune on finding the answer for this, they said....... the chicken as to have an egg you would need the ovaries of the chicken, google it lol
x"
but where did the chicken with the ovaries come from??
The answer will be 42,as that is the answer to life,the universe and everything! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *mileyBWoman
over a year ago
Northwood |
"What came first.the Christ or the Easter egg?
They're probably restocking the supermarket shelves with them as we speak.. well, type anyway...
Wolf
"
Nope Darwinian here and definitely Dinosaur not Christ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"wouldn't it be great if we eventually found out all these fossils were just a joke,buried by some advanced alien species just to piss us about?" that's not a million miles away from what creationists believe. That God put them there to test their faith.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The chicken and the egg are laying in bed together after bumping uglies. The chicken falls asleep.
The egg snatches at the quilt and rolls over saying "well I guess that really answers that question" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Blah, blah, blah
So its still the fkn egg then??
depends:-are we 100% sure that the species millions years ago wasn't viviparous,after all some animals change from male to female to suit the conditions so who knows whether things got so extreme that they may have evolved to lay eggs rather than bear live young"
Don't see what difference its makes either way...we are all on the SAME long path of evolution, of which humans are the latest model, don't matter what came first...only what we become.. But that's only MY belief! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic