FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Breeding
Breeding
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *ohn KanakaMan
over a year ago
Not all that North of North London |
"Love the thought of breeding a woman "
I know everyone will jump on this, but a serious question to try and understand this kink. I can understand the turn on of bareback sex but what is the attraction of making her pregnant? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Love the thought of breeding a woman
I know everyone will jump on this, but a serious question to try and understand this kink. I can understand the turn on of bareback sex but what is the attraction of making her pregnant?"
Men who don't think about the consequences of their actions |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
People have been having unprotected sex since the dawn of man. Its crucial to the survival of the human race.
Maybe keep it bagged up a bit longer mate the planets over populated anyway. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Love the thought of breeding a woman
As far as I'm aware, it's much easier to breed things like pigeons. But, hey, you do you "
If there's a news headline tomorrow
"Man fucks pigeon"
That's on you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
In theory this is a very easy kink to understand its pretty much hardwired into most species to want to reproduce.
One for the best kept in the fantasy section though imo |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids."
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?"
On fab, people like to use all sorts of silly terms for sex stuff  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ohn KanakaMan
over a year ago
Not all that North of North London |
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?"
Exactly. Ahd breeding implies pregnancy not just bareback. I don't think it's the sane thing at all |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?"
A “breeding kink” commonly refers to being turned on by sex that *could* result in pregnancy. It isn’t always about actually getting someone pregnant, but more often the thrill that comes from that being a potential outcome.
It typically manifests as the act of ejaculating inside someone (aka creampie).
For some, breeding as a kink is about exploring risk and the power dynamics of dominance and submission.
It isn’t always about creampies or pregnancy, even though those are the usually associated by-products. The more you know.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?
A “breeding kink” commonly refers to being turned on by sex that *could* result in pregnancy. It isn’t always about actually getting someone pregnant, but more often the thrill that comes from that being a potential outcome.
It typically manifests as the act of ejaculating inside someone (aka creampie).
For some, breeding as a kink is about exploring risk and the power dynamics of dominance and submission.
It isn’t always about creampies or pregnancy, even though those are the usually associated by-products. The more you know.
"
Now don’t let common sense get in the way of a bit of kink shaming  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do you a fat wallet to provide child support or are you expecting us tax payers to pay for the childrens upbringing? "
Tax payers so they can complain about something tangible |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The OP did say ‘the thought’. Perhaps just looking for others who also enjoy that thought.
I mean, I enjoy the thought of making Liz Hurley my naked boob buddy, but I suspect that won’t be becoming a reality anytime soon. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The OP did say ‘the thought’. Perhaps just looking for others who also enjoy that thought.
I mean, I enjoy the thought of making Liz Hurley my naked boob buddy, but I suspect that won’t be becoming a reality anytime soon."
I'm on board with that, can we share? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The OP did say ‘the thought’. Perhaps just looking for others who also enjoy that thought.
I mean, I enjoy the thought of making Liz Hurley my naked boob buddy, but I suspect that won’t be becoming a reality anytime soon.
I'm on board with that, can we share? "
Share Liz Hurley?
No, my deluded friend  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The OP did say ‘the thought’. Perhaps just looking for others who also enjoy that thought.
I mean, I enjoy the thought of making Liz Hurley my naked boob buddy, but I suspect that won’t be becoming a reality anytime soon.
I'm on board with that, can we share?
Share Liz Hurley?
No, my deluded friend "
I've met Liz Hurley before but it's kinda awkward talking about it soon |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The OP did say ‘the thought’. Perhaps just looking for others who also enjoy that thought.
I mean, I enjoy the thought of making Liz Hurley my naked boob buddy, but I suspect that won’t be becoming a reality anytime soon.
I'm on board with that, can we share?
Share Liz Hurley?
No, my deluded friend "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
But yeah a kink doesn't mean he's ACTIVELY looking to do it. I think that's what people jump to on here a little too much.
As that dude said above, you can 'practice' those links safely and not actually intend to bring many young poor kink meet babies into the world.
Though I can absolutely see kink meet babies being a hell of a band name or superhero TV show... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If breeding means bareback, then OK, fine, if you're both willing to take that risk (all sex has risks of STIs, I'm aware it's safer sex not safe sex)
Pregnancy and childbirth are a different thing to me - attempting to bring a third party into it, who by definition can't consent. (No, I didn't consent to my parents bringing me into the world, no, I don't think it's the same thing as attempting to do so casually) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I wonder if there's women out there that have breeding kinks from strangers?
Always seems to be men in my experience..."
I've seen journalists write articles that talk about the kink - women do indeed exist in that milieu.
(not me, for the record) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I wonder if there's women out there that have breeding kinks from strangers?
Always seems to be men in my experience...
I've seen journalists write articles that talk about the kink - women do indeed exist in that milieu.
(not me, for the record)"
Haha thanks for the clarification. Call me old fashioned but I think I usually assume people don't have it and will always be surprised when they do |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I wonder if there's women out there that have breeding kinks from strangers?
Always seems to be men in my experience...
The women on fab who say they're into it are in actual fact men "
Oh those old chestnuts! Love those 'ladies'! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?
A “breeding kink” commonly refers to being turned on by sex that *could* result in pregnancy. It isn’t always about actually getting someone pregnant, but more often the thrill that comes from that being a potential outcome.
It typically manifests as the act of ejaculating inside someone (aka creampie).
For some, breeding as a kink is about exploring risk and the power dynamics of dominance and submission.
It isn’t always about creampies or pregnancy, even though those are the usually associated by-products. The more you know.
"
It was a genuine question. Thanks for clarification |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *bi HaiveMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Cheeseville, Somerset |
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?
A “breeding kink” commonly refers to being turned on by sex that *could* result in pregnancy. It isn’t always about actually getting someone pregnant, but more often the thrill that comes from that being a potential outcome.
It typically manifests as the act of ejaculating inside someone (aka creampie).
For some, breeding as a kink is about exploring risk and the power dynamics of dominance and submission.
It isn’t always about creampies or pregnancy, even though those are the usually associated by-products. The more you know.
Now don’t let common sense get in the way of a bit of kink shaming "
Each to their own and there's very few kinks that I'll ever feel need any element of 'shaming'.
But anything that involves a lack of consent or any association with minors - which even in this case, as is said above *could* result in pregnancy - then to me that falls into the unacceptable category.
I couldn't give two shits if people want to be barebacked til the spunk bloats them and they spontaneously explode. I couldn't care less if guys get off on cumming in another man's partner and see it as them taking temporary possession of someone else's wife.
But to get a thrill from potentially causing a pregnancy that they no doubt would have no intention of being involved with? That's fucked up to me.
There are enough examples in this world of men getting multiple women pregnant and taking zero responsibility for the child once born for this to be in any way a desirable trait in someone you want to have casual sex with. I don't see any motivation for a guy to like this idea bar some kind of ego/power trip to indulge a fantasy of virility and pseudo alpha male superiority.
But that's me. Other opinions will of course vary.
But if anyone ever suggests that scenario to us in a message (and its happened) there is nothing that urges us to hit the block button any faster.
A |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?
A “breeding kink” commonly refers to being turned on by sex that *could* result in pregnancy. It isn’t always about actually getting someone pregnant, but more often the thrill that comes from that being a potential outcome.
It typically manifests as the act of ejaculating inside someone (aka creampie).
For some, breeding as a kink is about exploring risk and the power dynamics of dominance and submission.
It isn’t always about creampies or pregnancy, even though those are the usually associated by-products. The more you know.
Now don’t let common sense get in the way of a bit of kink shaming
Each to their own and there's very few kinks that I'll ever feel need any element of 'shaming'.
But anything that involves a lack of consent or any association with minors - which even in this case, as is said above *could* result in pregnancy - then to me that falls into the unacceptable category.
I couldn't give two shits if people want to be barebacked til the spunk bloats them and they spontaneously explode. I couldn't care less if guys get off on cumming in another man's partner and see it as them taking temporary possession of someone else's wife.
But to get a thrill from potentially causing a pregnancy that they no doubt would have no intention of being involved with? That's fucked up to me.
There are enough examples in this world of men getting multiple women pregnant and taking zero responsibility for the child once born for this to be in any way a desirable trait in someone you want to have casual sex with. I don't see any motivation for a guy to like this idea bar some kind of ego/power trip to indulge a fantasy of virility and pseudo alpha male superiority.
But that's me. Other opinions will of course vary.
But if anyone ever suggests that scenario to us in a message (and its happened) there is nothing that urges us to hit the block button any faster.
A"
Yeah. All sorts of shit (literally and figuratively) that's not my thing - eh, it's not my thing.
Involving people who don't or can't consent, including a hypothetical child (but also including surprising the pizza delivery guy or fucking in public) - that's my hard line. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?
A “breeding kink” commonly refers to being turned on by sex that *could* result in pregnancy. It isn’t always about actually getting someone pregnant, but more often the thrill that comes from that being a potential outcome.
It typically manifests as the act of ejaculating inside someone (aka creampie).
For some, breeding as a kink is about exploring risk and the power dynamics of dominance and submission.
It isn’t always about creampies or pregnancy, even though those are the usually associated by-products. The more you know.
Now don’t let common sense get in the way of a bit of kink shaming
Each to their own and there's very few kinks that I'll ever feel need any element of 'shaming'.
But anything that involves a lack of consent or any association with minors - which even in this case, as is said above *could* result in pregnancy - then to me that falls into the unacceptable category.
I couldn't give two shits if people want to be barebacked til the spunk bloats them and they spontaneously explode. I couldn't care less if guys get off on cumming in another man's partner and see it as them taking temporary possession of someone else's wife.
But to get a thrill from potentially causing a pregnancy that they no doubt would have no intention of being involved with? That's fucked up to me.
There are enough examples in this world of men getting multiple women pregnant and taking zero responsibility for the child once born for this to be in any way a desirable trait in someone you want to have casual sex with. I don't see any motivation for a guy to like this idea bar some kind of ego/power trip to indulge a fantasy of virility and pseudo alpha male superiority.
But that's me. Other opinions will of course vary.
But if anyone ever suggests that scenario to us in a message (and its happened) there is nothing that urges us to hit the block button any faster.
A"
It being unacceptable and not something you would participate in is fine. Rocking up on a thread and giving the person grief for it isn't - by that I mean anyone doing it. Especially as there is no evidence that he has ever acted this out and it resulted in an 'unwanted child'. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This snow balled fast!
I think like a couple of others have said it’s a ‘kink’ it’s the thought or role play aspect. And if a female is having unprotected sex with a male, then surely she is understanding of the ‘risks’ too.
I understand everyone has their own limits to what they deem acceptable play/kink, but I don’t think it means bollocking someone for voicing their own kink. Yes there are the exception to the rule where it’s more than a kink, but sadly that’s the world over.
And on a site like this I don’t think there’s enough time to count all the different forms of role play/kinks/scenarios.
There are pregnant couples who still meet bareback, there are people who like certain family role play and then gang bangs. Some may think they go to far, but each to their own as long as it’s not illegal or non consensual!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"This snow balled fast!
I think like a couple of others have said it’s a ‘kink’ it’s the thought or role play aspect. And if a female is having unprotected sex with a male, then surely she is understanding of the ‘risks’ too.
I understand everyone has their own limits to what they deem acceptable play/kink, but I don’t think it means bollocking someone for voicing their own kink. Yes there are the exception to the rule where it’s more than a kink, but sadly that’s the world over.
And on a site like this I don’t think there’s enough time to count all the different forms of role play/kinks/scenarios.
There are pregnant couples who still meet bareback, there are people who like certain family role play and then gang bangs. Some may think they go to far, but each to their own as long as it’s not illegal or non consensual! "
Agree with you here and nice tatts by the way! X |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *bi HaiveMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Cheeseville, Somerset |
"Dunno why some folks in this thread act like breeding kinks haven’t been a staple of the swinging commumity for long since before many of you.
Like most kinks, it can be practised in a way that doesn’t result in life-altering consequences for all parties involved (be it STDs or pregnancy)
If anything, most couples that live out their breeding kinks with willing men, use contraception.
Save the pearl clutching for things that matter more than people wanting to consentually swap bodily fluids.
So you're saying breeding is actually bareback sex and not getting a woman pregnant? If so why not call it bareback?
A “breeding kink” commonly refers to being turned on by sex that *could* result in pregnancy. It isn’t always about actually getting someone pregnant, but more often the thrill that comes from that being a potential outcome.
It typically manifests as the act of ejaculating inside someone (aka creampie).
For some, breeding as a kink is about exploring risk and the power dynamics of dominance and submission.
It isn’t always about creampies or pregnancy, even though those are the usually associated by-products. The more you know.
Now don’t let common sense get in the way of a bit of kink shaming
Each to their own and there's very few kinks that I'll ever feel need any element of 'shaming'.
But anything that involves a lack of consent or any association with minors - which even in this case, as is said above *could* result in pregnancy - then to me that falls into the unacceptable category.
I couldn't give two shits if people want to be barebacked til the spunk bloats them and they spontaneously explode. I couldn't care less if guys get off on cumming in another man's partner and see it as them taking temporary possession of someone else's wife.
But to get a thrill from potentially causing a pregnancy that they no doubt would have no intention of being involved with? That's fucked up to me.
There are enough examples in this world of men getting multiple women pregnant and taking zero responsibility for the child once born for this to be in any way a desirable trait in someone you want to have casual sex with. I don't see any motivation for a guy to like this idea bar some kind of ego/power trip to indulge a fantasy of virility and pseudo alpha male superiority.
But that's me. Other opinions will of course vary.
But if anyone ever suggests that scenario to us in a message (and its happened) there is nothing that urges us to hit the block button any faster.
A
It being unacceptable and not something you would participate in is fine. Rocking up on a thread and giving the person grief for it isn't - by that I mean anyone doing it. Especially as there is no evidence that he has ever acted this out and it resulted in an 'unwanted child'. "
I didn't give the OP grief. I expressed a personal view on the subject.
However starting a thread on the subject indicates it's something that the OP is acrively interested in whether they've acted it out or not.
I'd have the same opinion on someone who liked it as an idea as I would acted on it.
A |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The OP did say ‘the thought’. Perhaps just looking for others who also enjoy that thought.
I mean, I enjoy the thought of making Liz Hurley my naked boob buddy, but I suspect that won’t be becoming a reality anytime soon.
I'm on board with that, can we share?
Share Liz Hurley?
No, my deluded friend "
Well that's just being mean, can't we have a boob each and look into each others eyes? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxy jWoman
over a year ago
somerset |
funny how this kink gets mis-used its a age old kink that started life on the gay scene a man to breed a man was simply having bareback sex and cumming inside the other guy and has for some reason made its way to the hetro scene ...
as for getting pregnant women have been getting pregnant by men for no other reason that to have a child for themselves for as long as people have been around thet not a swinging thing thats a life thing that goes on daily like it or not ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"as for getting pregnant women have been getting pregnant by men for no other reason that to have a child for themselves for as long as people have been around that’s not a swinging thing thats a life thing that goes on daily, like it or not ..."
It’s a shite set of circumstances though. No? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oxy jWoman
over a year ago
somerset |
"as for getting pregnant women have been getting pregnant by men for no other reason that to have a child for themselves for as long as people have been around that’s not a swinging thing thats a life thing that goes on daily, like it or not ...
It’s a shite set of circumstances though. No?"
totally agree |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *bi HaiveMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Cheeseville, Somerset |
"as for getting pregnant women have been getting pregnant by men for no other reason that to have a child for themselves for as long as people have been around that’s not a swinging thing thats a life thing that goes on daily, like it or not ...
It’s a shite set of circumstances though. No?
totally agree "
Very true.
But the massive difference there is its the woman's choice (for whatever reason) to try to, or to get pregnant. She's the one going through the months of carrying a baby and giving birth. The one who should it happen has all the ongoing physical changes, difficult decisions and financial and emotional burdens.
Not someone else using the idea or the reality to get their kicks.
A |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
Just don't forget to invoice.
