FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > polyamory

polyamory

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 25/09/21 14:45:08]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Has anyone got any experience with this which they wouldn’t mind sharing with us please?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iggles and BeardyCouple  over a year ago

Bristol

Know several couples, it takes ton of honesty.

Basically swinging but with attachment and requires no jealousy.

Seen alot crumble due to being dishonest, or where the guy told several of them they were primary

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Wife says it intrigues Her but I’ll look into it,, not too sure on it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rKinksMan  over a year ago

Alton

The idea sounds fantastic being about to have strong connection physically and emotionally with more than one person.

However I'm quite a private person when it comes to my sex life.

Not sure how I'd introduce my partner's to other people?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ack688Man  over a year ago

abruzzo Italy (and UK)

There are a couple of really good books about dealing with the dynamics and emotions of polyamory.

The Ethical Slut by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy, which I’ve read and can very much recommend.

More than Two by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert, which I haven’t read yet but which is also supposed to be very good.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rKinksMan  over a year ago

Alton


"There are a couple of really good books about dealing with the dynamics and emotions of polyamory.

The Ethical Slut by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy, which I’ve read and can very much recommend.

More than Two by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert, which I haven’t read yet but which is also supposed to be very good. "

Thank you might have to check them out.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ack688Man  over a year ago

abruzzo Italy (and UK)

I think it’s likely to be more difficult to introduce this into existing non poly relationships than it is to start new relationships on a poly basis, but the extent that people want to be poly can vary greatly, it’s not a single type of situation. I have a good description of the types in an image format that I’m happy to send over to anyone interested

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *tirling DarkCouple  over a year ago

Stirling

We did it for 5 years, very enjoyable but caring duties, sadly, meant we had to concentrate our attentions elsewhere.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rKinksMan  over a year ago

Alton


"I think it’s likely to be more difficult to introduce this into existing non poly relationships than it is to start new relationships on a poly basis, but the extent that people want to be poly can vary greatly, it’s not a single type of situation. I have a good description of the types in an image format that I’m happy to send over to anyone interested "

Definitely be interested to see that.

Imagine that's very true your proposing a radical change to your relationship and changing the dynamics to why you got together.

As apose to bring open from the get go.

I struggle with the latter as I said I'm relatively private about my sex life and screaming I'm looking for a poly relationship would definably get back to work and family

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ack688Man  over a year ago

abruzzo Italy (and UK)


"I think it’s likely to be more difficult to introduce this into existing non poly relationships than it is to start new relationships on a poly basis, but the extent that people want to be poly can vary greatly, it’s not a single type of situation. I have a good description of the types in an image format that I’m happy to send over to anyone interested

Definitely be interested to see that.

Imagine that's very true your proposing a radical change to your relationship and changing the dynamics to why you got together.

As apose to bring open from the get go.

I struggle with the latter as I said I'm relatively private about my sex life and screaming I'm looking for a poly relationship would definably get back to work and family"

Sent

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rKinksMan  over a year ago

Alton

Thanks for the info

Imagine hierarchy polyamory is most common. Meeting someone like minded and opening up your relationship to over partner's. However correct me if I'm wrong I imagine not being the primary is very emotionally taxing and could easily lead to feeling isolated.

Imagine the is a higher "turn over" in none primarys.

Polyfidelity sounds dreamy especially if it was as a quad

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *wistedTooCouple  over a year ago

Frimley

It’s a fucking massive pain in the ass. Was for us. 5 or 6 month polyamorous relationship that was just a ball ache and a mess by the end. Much happier with two.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rKinksMan  over a year ago

Alton

If you don't mind sharing be helpful to hear why?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *wistedTooCouple  over a year ago

Frimley

Put simply, because each to their own and things are different for different people, but people change right? That’s the nature of life.

So when you have three individual personalities that change, that’s immediately more complex than 2. It becomes difficult to accommodate the wants and needs of more people.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *rKinksMan  over a year ago

Alton

Makes a lot of sense

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0