 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
its just the done thing, i have met many TVs and when they are dressed and im female mode i always refer to them as her
same on here i suppose, if they meeting in female mode they refer to themselves as a woman
to be fair tho i dont know any TV who have a female profile they all have TV profiles so its not that confusing really |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Yes, I'm not sure any TV's list themselves as women. I'd hope not.
As far as how we like to be addressed, it is just etiquette I think. When you spend as much time, money and effort as we do trying to look as much like a woman as we can, it's a bit deflating to be referred to as a geezer, even if we haven't made a good job of it.
I think it is different for TS's though. They are women that happened to be born in the wrong body. Whether pre-op or post op they are entitled to think of themselves as women, as that is what they are, they are just women with an unusual history. It is up to the TS to decide whether or when to divulge that history to a partner.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its just a man in a dress/skirt who cares what they want to be called.
90% of them look ridiculous anyway."
I got the sense that you didn't think much of TV's yesterday when you replied to my post in the "wam" thread with thinly veiled abuse. Then had the cheek to call ME judgemental.
Pot this is kettle.
Thanks for confirming my suspicions anyway. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I do think it requires more classification.
It might solve the age old problems of people saying that there's so many 'timewasters' on here when really they're just people who aren't able to tick a box for thier preferences like the rest of us.
Why it's discrimination I tell you!! LOL
There should be the M & F, but also in the sub catagory bi, bi curious, TV, TG etc. Then people would know who they're talking to. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I do think it requires more classification.
It might solve the age old problems of people saying that there's so many 'timewasters' on here when really they're just people who aren't able to tick a box for thier preferences like the rest of us.
Why it's discrimination I tell you!! LOL
There should be the M & F, but also in the sub catagory bi, bi curious, TV, TG etc. Then people would know who they're talking to."
....and by 'sub' catagory I didn't mean ..... yeah yeah ... you get it LOL |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its just a man in a dress/skirt who cares what they want to be called.
90% of them look ridiculous anyway."
Before we started swinging eighteen months ago I would have agreed with you .
However , two years down the line and after numerous visits to clubs I really can't say that now - nor indeed would I want to !
One of the many joys of this lifestyle is the liberation to be whatever you choose to be and do whatever you choose without the judgemental attitudes so prevalent in the vanilla world .
Although , clearly there are exceptions  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
