FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swingers Chat > Uncut vs Cut
Uncut vs Cut
Jump to: Newest in thread
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "
Sadly, circumcision is still legal 
I think it should be in the same category as FGM and only allowed for medical reasons. My dad was circumcised as a baby for medical reasons and quite rightly my gran absolutely hated the idea, but accepted it was necessary. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *lwenWoman
over a year ago
De12 area |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "
My brother had his circumcised on Monday.. Due to medical reasons and he's in his 50s..
So yes men are still getting it done.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture "
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *D835Man
over a year ago
London |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it "
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
Sadly, circumcision is still legal
I think it should be in the same category as FGM and only allowed for medical reasons. My dad was circumcised as a baby for medical reasons and quite rightly my gran absolutely hated the idea, but accepted it was necessary. "
Agree 100%, for medical purposes only otherwise it is mutilation. There is a foreskin there for a reason  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rHotNottsMan
over a year ago
Dubai & Nottingham |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP. "
It’s adults mutilating children just the same as FGM in Africa. The children don’t a choice , it’s wrong. The fact that it’s legal in the uk in certain cultures using “medical reasons” to get around the law and thier own doctors is a disgrace |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
It’s adults mutilating children just the same as FGM in Africa. The children don’t a choice , it’s wrong. The fact that it’s legal in the uk in certain cultures using “medical reasons” to get around the law and thier own doctors is a disgrace "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP. "
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not for sex.
Hand job is easier with uncut though."
I'm imagining your style of hand job, please don't take offense as what works for me won't be for everyone, wanting loose skin does jack shit for me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I was spoiled for 15 years of a 21 Yr marriage as ex hubby was circumcised - loved him being cut.
If I had a preference, I would say cut but at the end of the day, it's the fella I'm more attracted to rather than his missing or intact foreskin  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I’m uncut, been married a couple of times, had numerous lovers, got four kids and it’s served me well and given loads of pleasure but foreskin is tight and painful to retract. So getting it removed soon and looking forward to feeling a mouth around the exposed head. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Mine was done as a child for medical reasons. Never had any negative experience because of it."
Same for me too. We both prefer the look of a cut cock tho |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *D835Man
over a year ago
London |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong "
"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."
-----------------------
That's just your opinion though.
There is no law which says it is wrong. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *D835Man
over a year ago
London |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong "
That's just your 'opinion'. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong
That's just your 'opinion'."
Why are you sending me unsolicited DMs to me about this ????  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Just my opinion, but definitely uncut. Really don't like the look of cut, to me a lot of them just look like they've been beaten up.
And just an observation, but during my time on here I've had quite a few messages from cut guys wanting to play with my uncut cock just to find out what it's like |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong
"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."
-----------------------
That's just your opinion though.
There is no law which says it is wrong. "
So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.
How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *D835Man
over a year ago
London |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong
"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."
-----------------------
That's just your opinion though.
There is no law which says it is wrong.
So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.
How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong?"
".....How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child...."
---------------------------
Taking a foreskin off is *not* mutilation. That's where your argument falls apart. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong
"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."
-----------------------
That's just your opinion though.
There is no law which says it is wrong.
So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.
How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong?
".....How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child...."
---------------------------
Taking a foreskin off is *not* mutilation. That's where your argument falls apart."
Yeah it pretty much is if there is no medical requirement to do so, on a person who has no say in the matter.
If you want to chop the end of your knob when you're 18, then go crazy, but there really is no justification for this to still be carried out on babies/boys unless it's causing a physical problem |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I was circumcised 3 years ago and wouldn’t look back. I had a very tight foreskin! Hence the breaking of my banjo!!
Jeez my eyes still water. However wish I had it done years ago!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *D835Man
over a year ago
London |
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18?
I got circumcised and so did every boy in my family. It's part of our culture
Oh that makes it totally fine then doesn’t it
It’s not illegal.
So people have the option and choice whether to do it or not. There’s no right or wrong about it.
Anyway back to the question posed by the OP.
I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong
"....I’m sorry but if it’s performed on someone under 18 because of the will of the parent I think it is very wrong ..."
-----------------------
That's just your opinion though.
There is no law which says it is wrong.
So, there has to be a law in place that makes it either right or wrong? Surely morals and ethics come into it, would you not agree? Possibly not, it would seem.
How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child, without consent, and not think it’s wrong?
".....How can you look at mutilating the penis of a child...."
---------------------------
Taking a foreskin off is *not* mutilation. That's where your argument falls apart.
Yeah it pretty much is if there is no medical requirement to do so, on a person who has no say in the matter.
If you want to chop the end of your knob when you're 18, then go crazy, but there really is no justification for this to still be carried out on babies/boys unless it's causing a physical problem"
Maybe you first need to check the meaning of mutilation, as that's the the issue I was responding to. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured -from Wikipedia
So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.
I think that pretty much describes circumcision |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *D835Man
over a year ago
London |
"Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured -from Wikipedia
So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.
I think that pretty much describes circumcision"
And let me help you with the definition from the Cambridge Dictionary.
It describes mutilation as:
to damage something severely, especially by violently removing a part.
1. Taking the fore skin off is *not* causing 'severe damage' to the penis.
2. The process of taking the fore skin off is not a 'violent action'. It is a perfectly safe operation that takes place every single day around the world.
As per your definition above; mutilation is synonymous with maiming.
Taking the fore skin off does not leave anyone 'maimed'
Also as par your definition: taking the foreskin off does not leave anyone 'permanently damaged' nor 'disfigured'
So like I said before, taking the foreskin off cannot be described as mutilation.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured -from Wikipedia
So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.
I think that pretty much describes circumcision
And let me help you with the definition from the Cambridge Dictionary.
It describes mutilation as:
to damage something severely, especially by violently removing a part.
1. Taking the fore skin off is *not* causing 'severe damage' to the penis.
2. The process of taking the fore skin off is not a 'violent action'. It is a perfectly safe operation that takes place every single day around the world.
As per your definition above; mutilation is synonymous with maiming.
Taking the fore skin off does not leave anyone 'maimed'
Also as par your definition: taking the foreskin off does not leave anyone 'permanently damaged' nor 'disfigured'
So like I said before, taking the foreskin off cannot be described as mutilation.
"
Well we'll just have to agree to disagree
I'm just very grateful my parents didn't mutilate me without my consent  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *D835Man
over a year ago
London |
"Mutilation or maiming (from the Latin: mutilus) is cutting off or causing injury to a body part of a person so that the part of the body is permanently damaged, detached or disfigured -from Wikipedia
So basically summarising the above - cutting off a body part so that the part of the body is permanently detached.
I think that pretty much describes circumcision
And let me help you with the definition from the Cambridge Dictionary.
It describes mutilation as:
to damage something severely, especially by violently removing a part.
1. Taking the fore skin off is *not* causing 'severe damage' to the penis.
2. The process of taking the fore skin off is not a 'violent action'. It is a perfectly safe operation that takes place every single day around the world.
As per your definition above; mutilation is synonymous with maiming.
Taking the fore skin off does not leave anyone 'maimed'
Also as par your definition: taking the foreskin off does not leave anyone 'permanently damaged' nor 'disfigured'
So like I said before, taking the foreskin off cannot be described as mutilation.
Well we'll just have to agree to disagree
I'm just very grateful my parents didn't mutilate me without my consent "
Yes we have to agree to disagree.
That's why I said from the onset, that there is no right or wrong answer to this issue.
It's down to opinion, - which obviously varies from one person to another. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'm uncut and can retract my foreskin easily. The foreskin sliding back and forth over the head feels amazing. A few lady friends on Skype like to watch me move my foreskin over the head and pull it back for them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They prefer a foreskin that completely retracts is my experience?
However are guys still getting circumcised in this day and age ??? Is it even legal for an under 18? "
I was circumsised at a very young age for medical reasons. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
