 |
By *sm265Woman
over a year ago
Shangri-la |
Judging by status updates and messages etc, it would appear that plenty of people on here already are meeting, regardless of government advice/rules and fab policy.
I would think that Fab as a site will maintain their current official stance on meets until such a time as the government guidance says that social distancing is no longer necessary, otherwise they could potentially be seen to be encouraging people to go against the government 'rules', which the press would no doubt have a field day with.
I could be wrong though.
Even if fab said it was OK to meet today, I wouldnt be. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Judging by status updates and messages etc, it would appear that plenty of people on here already are meeting, regardless of government advice/rules and fab policy.
I would think that Fab as a site will maintain their current official stance on meets until such a time as the government guidance says that social distancing is no longer necessary, otherwise they could potentially be seen to be encouraging people to go against the government 'rules', which the press would no doubt have a field day with.
I could be wrong though.
Even if fab said it was OK to meet today, I wouldnt be. "
Just to be pedantic, the `rules`are rules, even if it seems like a large minority are ignoring them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Judging by status updates and messages etc, it would appear that plenty of people on here already are meeting, regardless of government advice/rules and fab policy.
I would think that Fab as a site will maintain their current official stance on meets until such a time as the government guidance says that social distancing is no longer necessary, otherwise they could potentially be seen to be encouraging people to go against the government 'rules', which the press would no doubt have a field day with.
I could be wrong though.
Even if fab said it was OK to meet today, I wouldnt be. "
Encouraging to go against rules??
So when married folks openly say they are cheating on their profile, does that mean fab is encouraging infidelity?
Its a personal choice and the people on this site should be allowed to have the facility to choose if they want to meet.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *arl17Man
over a year ago
Central Portugal |
"When the government say there's no need for social distancing.
Would you do a thing the government told you too?? "
Always wise to take advise on how not to catch a virus from a bunch of twats who caught it already and keep breaking their own advice all the time ... 
Think not  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We will see in about two weeks, I will waite to see what happens with the easing bfore I even think about meeting. I'm horny as fk but I would rather still be unsuccessfully trying to arange a meet when I reach the 99yr cut off age. Plus if I got it and passed it to somebody, i would be gutted. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
