FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swinging Support and Advice > All profiles

All profiles

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Have to say. Come on fab please please. All profiles on here Sould and have a vefi photo and also every profile sould have 1 public photo. Up. Or you can not join. Please like and comment as I will go back to fab. To try and make this happen.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Have to say. Come on fab please please. All profiles on here Sould and have a vefi photo and also every profile sould have 1 public photo. Up. Or you can not join. Please like and comment as I will go back to fab. To try and make this happen. "

you have no profile pic..what are you on about? if people want to they can block profiles with no profile pic already. and any old pic can be from anywhere really...it would be impractical for admin to spend time reverse searching every single photo surely? is that what you are trying to suggest they do?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Good luck with that.

I'm sure you will be able to convince Fab to implement these rulesites at once.

No doubt it will all have gone through shenanigans I log on tomorrow

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *DontExistWoman over a year ago

•+• Silicon valley. •+•

i'm not photo verifying this time round, hate my photo that i take for that and it always bugs me.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *dores blackmenWoman over a year ago

incognito mode ;-)

So you mean all men should put a cock pic up and pic veri

I'm not pic verified btw

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

And another one...

Telling everyone else how Fab should work to meet their own prejudices...

It's simple if you don't like something move on...if you don't like fab just go unlos and set up your ow version of fab you will be happy with...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

No thanks. We're not photo verified, won't be doing it and attach no value to them on other people's profiles. Even if they were unfakeable they still only tell you someone of the right gender is involved with the profile.

In terms of public pics you can filter for only profiles with them. The tools are there if you want to use them. It's potentially a free site, I imagine adding more admin could change that or increase sure supporter costs.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Fab have said they will never introduce compulsory PV. Block non verified users and ones with no public pics, job done.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ackDMissMorganCouple over a year ago

Halifax

Just avoid the ones with no pics op or block them using your filters

Miss

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

theres more chance of a double dick shot being banned than a profile with no pics...would you like that OP?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *thwalescplCouple over a year ago

brecon

Photo veries are worthless, and not everyone wants to display any type of public pic, which is personal choice.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified."

Good idea, then if you forget to let fab know you've moved the new occupiers can find out what you've been up to

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Good idea, then if you forget to let fab know you've moved the new occupiers can find out what you've been up to

Or if the site is hacked, everyone will know!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *icecouple561Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

I can never envisage circumstances under which I would give a swinging web site my address. Aside from that I wonder how much it would cost to send a code, by post to every verified member.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I think that Fab should make it a rule that no man over the age of 24 should be allowed to have Lad as part of their user name

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I'm not getting photo verified and my photo is really a pair of knickers stretched over a couple of pumpkins, nobody has noticed ha ha XXX

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified."

Presume you're taking the piss?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I'm not getting photo verified and my photo is really a pair of knickers stretched over a couple of pumpkins, nobody has noticed ha ha XXX"

I'm really a 38 stone bricklayer, with a ton of scars from pub brawls

And my mum writes all my forum contributions

No one's rumbled me yet eeva

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Good idea, then if you forget to let fab know you've moved the new occupiers can find out what you've been up to

So if you got a plain postcard with a code addressed to "Homeowner", what does that tell the new home owner?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I can never envisage circumstances under which I would give a swinging web site my address. Aside from that I wonder how much it would cost to send a code, by post to every verified member.

Erm, if you paid £2 per year admin fee, I'm sure that would cover it. Rocket science isn't it, lol.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Presume you're taking the piss?"

No, unlike yourselves, we're keen on seeing the site to be better place with more genuine profiles with less timewasters. Not sure why you condone timewasters? Odd.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *lceeWoman over a year ago

Leeds

But we all have the option to block unverified or picless profiles. Job done.

NEEEXT!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"But we all have the option to block unverified or picless profiles. Job done.

NEEEXT!

Exactly!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *alandNitaCouple over a year ago

Scunthorpe

"But we all have the option to block unverified or picless profiles. Job done.

NEEEXT!

Exactly!"

We agree. .. photo verification is pointless and doesn't prove they are who they say they are.

We have no intention of being photo verified.

I'd rather ban using genitals as avatars, so I can use Fab in public without cocks on show

Nita

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Good idea, then if you forget to let fab know you've moved the new occupiers can find out what you've been up to

So if you got a plain postcard with a code addressed to "Homeowner", what does that tell the new home owner?"

Homeowner, please log into your fab account and enter the code, if you have forgotten your login details please contact.....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Presume you're taking the piss?

No, unlike yourselves, we're keen on seeing the site to be better place with more genuine profiles with less timewasters. Not sure why you condone timewasters? Odd."

We don't condone time wasters we just think your idea is totally crackpot and would never work

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Presume you're taking the piss?

No, unlike yourselves, we're keen on seeing the site to be better place with more genuine profiles with less timewasters. Not sure why you condone timewasters? Odd.

We don't condone time wasters we just think your idea is totally crackpot and would never work

Couchsurfing use the idea !!!! It works !!!

E-mail them, tell them they're crackpots, lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Good idea, then if you forget to let fab know you've moved the new occupiers can find out what you've been up to

So if you got a plain postcard with a code addressed to "Homeowner", what does that tell the new home owner?

Homeowner, please log into your fab account and enter the code, if you have forgotten your login details please contact....."

Erm, *scratch head* do you know what "Plain" means? That'll be a no!! Will the code work on other people's account? Yet again, that'll be a no!! Have you thought your reply through, yet again, that'll be a no!!, lol

Come on chaps and lasses, stop being anal and use the brain cells you were born with.

Stop trying to come up with useless objections and try to sort the problem out.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Good idea, then if you forget to let fab know you've moved the new occupiers can find out what you've been up to

So if you got a plain postcard with a code addressed to "Homeowner", what does that tell the new home owner?

Homeowner, please log into your fab account and enter the code, if you have forgotten your login details please contact.....

Come on chaps and lasses, stop being anal and use the brain cells you were born with.

Stop trying to come up with useless objections and try to sort the problem out."

There is no problem as fab have filters.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

So if there are no problems, there are no timewasters and false accounts?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Is there a filter to block timewasters and false accounts? Hmm.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"So if there are no problems, there are no timewasters and false accounts?"

Of course there are but I've never really had any issues with them. You can block non verified users, you can block people who aren't site supporter's. Whilst some can still slip through, it lessens the chances somewhat. Maybe I've been lucky, maybe I've been here so long I've developed a sixth sense for time wasters but my gut instinct serves me very well. I appreciated as I'm looking for men, it is less likely for people to be pretending to be male on here, why would you but all I know is, running my profile as I do, it's easy to spot genuine profiles. The filters work perfectly well for me, my gut instinct, along with a phone call, does the rest.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"So if there are no problems, there are no timewasters and false accounts?

Yes, you've been lucky.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Time wasters and fakers would still reply to a postal vote..... in fact they'd probably be the only Ines daft enough to give out their home address

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 28/08/17 23:29:34]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified.

Good idea, then if you forget to let fab know you've moved the new occupiers can find out what you've been up to

So if you got a plain postcard with a code addressed to "Homeowner", what does that tell the new home owner?

Homeowner, please log into your fab account and enter the code, if you have forgotten your login details please contact.....

Come on chaps and lasses, stop being anal and use the brain cells you were born with.

Stop trying to come up with useless objections and try to sort the problem out."

Fab and how it runs is no problem to me....LOL

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Write on profile and it doesn't seem to save what been written

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *icecouple561Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

East Sussex

"Write on profile and it doesn't seem to save what been written"

Are you scrolling down to the bottom of the page after all the preference boxes and ticking the "save profile" box?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *icoleAndLisaTransTV/TS over a year ago

Ellesmere Port

Why stop there? Why not insist that everyone gets photo verified, with a face pic, and that the verification photo is displayed on their profile?

The fact that we'd lose about 80% of the membership overnight might not make this such a good idea.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *imetoexplore69Couple over a year ago

Aberdeen

"We're photo verified, very simple to do.

We think a code, each year, should be sent to your home address for you to enter into the site to be address verified.

This can be done, say quarterly, to be e-mail and mobile phone verified.

All should be optional.

Then we should have filter system options to block a combination of none photo, address, e-mail, mobile phone verified profiles.

Then we would only choose to see those who have been fully verified."
address verified? Fuck that.sites with far better security than this one have been hacked and you want the internet to know where a swinger lives

.you can already block unverified people just use your own common sense and use the tools already provided and you will get on fine.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *loppsyWoman over a year ago

marlow

I'm not photo verified and don't intend to be. I'm verified by people I have actually met. If not being photo verified makes people think I'm a time waster then that's their problem not mine!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I can never envisage circumstances under which I would give a swinging web site my address. Aside from that I wonder how much it would cost to send a code, by post to every verified member.

Erm, if you paid £2 per year admin fee, I'm sure that would cover it. Rocket science isn't it, lol."

Seriously ?? Do you really think the site owners have time to do this and that £2 will cover it? If you don't like how the site is run then leave or maybe set up your own site and run it like that it's not rocket science is it?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *carlettxWoman over a year ago

Essex

Have you ever heard the saying 'people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones' ... where's your profile pic mate ??

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *sGivesWoodWoman over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL

Exactly, so OP shouldn't be on here at all then...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Too many women only pics on profiles where the men hiding

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *imetoexplore69Couple over a year ago

Aberdeen

"Too many women only pics on profiles where the men hiding "
em you have one pic of a close up of a pair of boxer shorts? That's worse than my standard cock pic

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I'm not getting photo verified and my photo is really a pair of knickers stretched over a couple of pumpkins, nobody has noticed ha ha XXX"

Very sexy pumpkins though xx

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

The op is a Hippocrate

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *rnortholtMan over a year ago

Waveney Valley

How about all new members have to got to a social where they can be verified and until then they can't access the site, send or receive mails or post in forums. In fact you can't join unless you're verified and then only when there's a full moon and Venus is in Capricorn?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *lirty-CoupleCouple over a year ago

Bexley

How about all the people who're so keen for everyone to give their addresses etc. to admin just do so of their own volition, thereby confirming their support for postal verification. If Admin is deluged they might just decide it's a jolly good idea and impose it. If not, they won't. You could call it putting you money where your mouth is...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *inky-MinxWoman over a year ago

Grantham

OP they've agreed to do it. But you have to put your face pic up as your avatar

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

The irony is ironic!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

By *ussexcouple40Couple over a year ago

Sussex

We are not photo verified as we sent a picture which was how they asked but they turned it down and we are not jumping through hoops.

Photo verified means nothing to us. Only real meet verifications mean anything.

Anyone can photo verify themselves but doesn't stop them being a time waster or worse

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic