FabSwingers.com > Forums > Swinging Support and Advice > Male half arranging wife's meets
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You'll find it's very common on here, the Male of the couple sending loads of winks and messages and the Wife has no clue. We've bumped into people in a club and the Wife had no idea they'd messaged us." So in your case the wife was a real person | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You'll find it's very common on here, the Male of the couple sending loads of winks and messages and the Wife has no clue. We've bumped into people in a club and the Wife had no idea they'd messaged us. So in your case the wife was a real person " I have no chance of remembering those people i've contacted... whats so shocking? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wouldn't even entertain a reply to the 1st message Mrs " How can both halves of a couple type and send a message? Do they both press each key together? I should think in most couples the guy sends the first message, the woman might have discussed the choice prior to sending you can't possibly know? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wouldn't even entertain a reply to the 1st message Mrs How can both halves of a couple type and send a message? Do they both press each key together? I should think in most couples the guy sends the first message, the woman might have discussed the choice prior to sending you can't possibly know?" Firstly I (Mrs) usually message, secondly if the message starts with my wife doesn't come on here often - it's a no. It's easy to sign off who is who and it's easy to arrange a 3/4 way group chat. It's generally pretty obvious when there's no Mrs around they make excuses within the 1st if not 1st few messages. We both reply, both use the forums, people can clearly see there's two of us, it's not difficult. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wouldn't even entertain a reply to the 1st message Mrs How can both halves of a couple type and send a message? Do they both press each key together? I should think in most couples the guy sends the first message, the woman might have discussed the choice prior to sending you can't possibly know?" Also with the pressing keys together snarky remark we both log in via our own phones we both reply after all there meeting is both and want to know us both. Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put it this way I separate the wheat from the chaff and when I see there is a message worthy of an acknowledgment I then let Kat know who then decides if she’s open to taking things further. Any husband taking responsibility for this is looking out for their wives. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Put it this way I separate the wheat from the chaff and when I see there is a message worthy of an acknowledgment I then let Kat know who then decides if she’s open to taking things further. Any husband taking responsibility for this is looking out for their wives. " Completely different to what the OP is describing though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Sally doesn't use this site to send messages. She reads them, but rarely sends one. I think in almost a decade on here, she's sent about 5 messages. They were sent on my request, usually as we're driving to a neet or similar. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" I have arranged a meet where the wife didn't chat at all, but from her side she knew I was doing it that I know exactly what she would/wouldn't like, and for the person we involved I sent pictures staged as they asked (message, pose, items etc) so they knew she was a genuine person. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Laura does sometimes ask me to message on her behalf but I always make clear in the message that this is the case. Within our dynamic, with me being Cuckold, part of my duties are to facilitate her fun including making the initial contact. Having said that she does get involved later in the conversation if she is still interested and we wouldn’t progress to a meet without having done so. " Exactly the same dynamic I had | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" In all honesty, wouldn't even entertain a reply. It just screams fake sadly. In a world where we have to have our eyes peeled for red flags, this unfortunately throws up a big one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Yes. I've had a couple of these and get blocked as soon as I insist on having some idea what the woman wants out of it all. These men couldn't even lie about that, weirdly enough. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Depends. If they are well verified then fine. With some couples the man arranges things and the lady is happy not to get involved much. Sometimes just checking pics or sometimes not at all. I’ve met couples in the past with no female contact at all beforehand and all been good. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" I've lost count how many men with single profiles have a wife or gf who wants to ride me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If I find that a guy may have something to offer us I then discuss with her and IF SHE AGREES I arrange a 3 way phone chat - just so the guy in question knows that there is a informed woman involved. If that chat goes well we will then offer to meet socially and if that all goes swimmingly then the next meet would be to play. It's a system we've used for quite some time and one we will continue to use as it works for us." Wish everyone could work like that, but we are all different, phone chat and a social in my world should be the norm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If I find that a guy may have something to offer us I then discuss with her and IF SHE AGREES I arrange a 3 way phone chat - just so the guy in question knows that there is a informed woman involved. If that chat goes well we will then offer to meet socially and if that all goes swimmingly then the next meet would be to play. It's a system we've used for quite some time and one we will continue to use as it works for us. Wish everyone could work like that, but we are all different, phone chat and a social in my world should be the norm " That's not the world many people inhabit. They just want to meet and fuck These things work differently for everybody. As I said above verifications can avoid a lot of problems. Also lots of people don't want to give out phone numbers. These days you've got phone number then you can see WhatsApp and if you can see WhatsApp then you can see Facebook and that opens up somebody's private work potentially. Lots of people I know have had problems over the years from giving out numbers - eg one lady outing another lady to her friends/family on Facebook. There are some vindictive people out there if things don't go to plan. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Had a lot of "couples" profiles message Me, and the male admitting that he is single. Or that he is trying to get a threesome for his girlfriend who knows nothing about it. It's dangerous, it's very very unwise to do this. I do know somebody who had this happened to them. The husband literally invited an unknown male stranger into the marital home. The poor woman was rapped, she did not give consent." How do you know she didn't give her consent? That's a rather strong accusation when you haven't provided any proof. this could be the way the couple like it done | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" I'd continue with caution. I met with a nice couple from here which was entirely organised by the male. But since realised I got extremely lucky and all since have stood me up, bailed or ghosted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm in touch with a couple just now and when things start you kind of are wary of it maybe being a fraud or a male pretending to be the woman, but this chat is very definitely her. Then an odd message appeared and I immediately thought that's the hubby and obviously he has no idea of my chat with his wife .. so I let him know where I stand in things and leave them to respond .. next really was very confusing and it nearly was all over. I wish couples would make it clear who's chatting at any given time and exactly who knows what .. trying to guess all this is a battle .. " We've explained it in our profile... It's quite amusing when those who don't read it assume they are chatting with Sally! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Had a lot of "couples" profiles message Me, and the male admitting that he is single. Or that he is trying to get a threesome for his girlfriend who knows nothing about it. It's dangerous, it's very very unwise to do this. I do know somebody who had this happened to them. The husband literally invited an unknown male stranger into the marital home. The poor woman was rapped, she did not give consent. How do you know she didn't give her consent? That's a rather strong accusation when you haven't provided any proof. this could be the way the couple like it done" I so agree. Rapping is the worst. Some sort of freestyling type thing no doubt. Traumatic, I'm sure. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This is certainly a fantasy of ours but not been brave enough yet. " Hopefully you'll love it when you're both in the right headspace to try it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Yes, very suspicious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I (Mr) do the “Fabmin”, responding to messages, winks etc and she gets involved once I’ve filtered down the possibles for the hot list as I know what she likes. By then I’ve deleted the heys, hi’s, hows yous the meet now’s and the cock pics that she doesn’t have the patience for. " Exactly this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Yes yes yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger." I get that for some it's their dynamic but as this lady says what about the barbaric nature of the abusers who are not roleplaying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger. I get that for some it's their dynamic but as this lady says what about the barbaric nature of the abusers who are not roleplaying " Exactly not all couples are mutually consentually agreeing.Its abuse if She is not aware. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger." This is exactly my concern. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding." I pray to God that it was just a fantasy, a very sick one at that. But unfortunately I have heard this happen and I have seen the photographs. There are some extremely sick/cruel people in this world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" It’s a no from me as well. Happy to chat to me half arranging social meet for three of us and chat to her in neutral env. Won’t come to their home, hotel or invite them over to mine without talking to female part (same if female organising) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding." Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger. This is exactly my concern." You have a single man profile and find it ok to use a woman on your profile, is that OK? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds?" Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe)." How do you know it was missing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger. This is exactly my concern. You have a single man profile and find it ok to use a woman on your profile, is that OK?" One of the cocks maybe his, and tbh there are no distinguishing marks, tattoos to say who the woman or the other man is, it's also been checked by the mods. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe). How do you know it was missing?" Sleeping and d*unk is clearly missing consent. It seems like you are only here to be clickbait so I'll leave you to pick at shit by yourself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger. This is exactly my concern. You have a single man profile and find it ok to use a woman on your profile, is that OK? One of the cocks maybe his, and tbh there are no distinguishing marks, tattoos to say who the woman or the other man is, it's also been checked by the mods. " He is still using a woman to get what he wants | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe). How do you know it was missing? Sleeping and d*unk is clearly missing consent. It seems like you are only here to be clickbait so I'll leave you to pick at shit by yourself " CNC is also taboo it doesn't mean people don't enjoy it. Some women enjoy the stranger encounter and her consent may have been given prior to getting d*unk, you don't know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger. This is exactly my concern. You have a single man profile and find it ok to use a woman on your profile, is that OK?" Yes it is because it is the same lady in both pictures and she consented to them being on my profile. I have also given my consent to being in the pics on her profile. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Chances are it will be me (the male half) you speak to first, I wouldn’t arrange any meets for her (us) though, she would have to have to be involved in that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I....the male...do tend to make most the contacts. However, once an interest is made and a meet looks like happening we are both fully involved. She actually prefurs this as dosnt have the patience to message. So long as she is kept in the loop. X " Same for us, luckily we have a fair few verifications to prove we are genuine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"@_armandwet50 Thanks for the mention - I've had a dozen fabs on my photos today " Awww that's sad ?? sorry about that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"@_armandwet50 Thanks for the mention - I've had a dozen fabs on my photos today Awww that's sad ?? sorry about that " Sounds like a good thing no? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"@_armandwet50 Thanks for the mention - I've had a dozen fabs on my photos today Awww that's sad ?? sorry about that Sounds like a good thing no?" It really depends on how many of those views converted to meets or whether it made people think why is he using a woman? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Men usually don't care if the woman is aware or even exists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her Men usually don't care if the woman is aware or even exists. " Sweeping statement, maybe its the men you know because I and the guys I know won't entertain such a thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her Men usually don't care if the woman is aware or even exists. Sweeping statement, maybe its the men you know because I and the guys I know won't entertain such a thing. " I didn't say all. It's a statement of absolute knowledge and fact, from reading threads such as these. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You'll find it's very common on here, the Male of the couple sending loads of winks and messages and the Wife has no clue. We've bumped into people in a club and the Wife had no idea they'd messaged us. So in your case the wife was a real person " lol, what I was goig to say but you said it. I post on our account and just show Mrs potential meets for a yes/no but we both know what we are comfy with and what no. If you are a couple, ask questions, many questions and if the potential meet gets a bit angry, you've saved yourself wasted time. The way to find out if one is a genuine couple, speak to the wife before a meet - we do that ie wife says hi to any potentials If you are meeting a single man, ask them to send you a pic of their face holding your user name against it - we do that and a few have fallen at this hurdel even though their face pic is posted all over their profile. Thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have no problem chatting to either person of the couple but I will always want to speak to the lady to ensure all is well. " At what point would you want to speak to the lasy to enaure "all is well"" Not sure what you mean? We as per my previous post, Mrs will say hi and talk a bit as we are nearing a possible meet and that has never been a problem. I'm not sure what you meant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Initially I always do the chatting and messaging, and if we ever get to a point where we find someone who we feel understands and respects what we are looking for then my wife will then chat to them, and sometimes set up a group chat on another platform, where we can all talk independently. If that doesn’t suit some people then they obviously aren’t the right person for us | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have no problem chatting to either person of the couple but I will always want to speak to the lady to ensure all is well. " Same. Half to prove that I'm real, aware and consent, and half the same for her. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As a counsellor for women I have had hundreds of sessions with ladies who have been "controlled" by a husband who wishes to swing, she does not. Males turning up to the marital home without Her permission.Her being in danger." This company is why I hold back until I've had a social meet with both of them or proof the Mrs is genuinely interested. I prefer to meet both and happy after that for mr to arrange 'encounters' In this day and age guys need to be very very careful.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It does happen - but 9 times out of 10 it’s a man having a wank and there’s no partner involved. Best to stick to verified couples profiles." Exactly why we insist on varified only. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" From a single male account? Absofuckinglutely From a couples account? Maybe not so much | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" We wouldn't ever consider this, it's wrong in our eyes, and also you just don't know what goes on behind cloed doors, me personally (mrs) feels like this lifestyle is forced on some of these women, a form of domestic A**se! Maybe not..maybe it is ligit but we won't be a part of it just incase, but all of that aside, everyone should have a choice who they have sex with! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her We wouldn't ever consider this, it's wrong in our eyes, and also you just don't know what goes on behind cloed doors, me personally (mrs) feels like this lifestyle is forced on some of these women, a form of domestic A**se! Maybe not..maybe it is ligit but we won't be a part of it just incase, but all of that aside, everyone should have a choice who they have sex with! " In most of the genuine couples cases where the husband arranges the meets the wife has a choice and she has consented | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her We wouldn't ever consider this, it's wrong in our eyes, and also you just don't know what goes on behind cloed doors, me personally (mrs) feels like this lifestyle is forced on some of these women, a form of domestic A**se! Maybe not..maybe it is ligit but we won't be a part of it just incase, but all of that aside, everyone should have a choice who they have sex with! In most of the genuine couples cases where the husband arranges the meets the wife has a choice and she has consented " Most? It's not worth the risk. I guess that confirming consent just isn't important to some people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" This is the situation for 98% of meets on here. It’s normal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I (Vinny) manage 95% of the admin of our profile. Why? Because initially Jo got involved and the messages just turned awful and relentless as soon as the guy knew it was Jo, " what you wearing?", " i wanna fuck you till you scream", " can you meet me without Vinny?" And then came the abuse if they were turned down. It very nearly killed the lifestyle before it started for us. So now I do the initial filtering in terms of what she likes and the limp messages, Jo reviews the ones I haven't deleted and picks her hotlist, who I then start to communicate with. I am always clear from the start how we manage our profile and we are well verified so it does work" Whose idea was it to continue despite the relentlessly awful men looking for sex ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her We wouldn't ever consider this, it's wrong in our eyes, and also you just don't know what goes on behind cloed doors, me personally (mrs) feels like this lifestyle is forced on some of these women, a form of domestic A**se! Maybe not..maybe it is ligit but we won't be a part of it just incase, but all of that aside, everyone should have a choice who they have sex with! In most of the genuine couples cases where the husband arranges the meets the wife has a choice and she has consented Most? It's not worth the risk. I guess that confirming consent just isn't important to some people. " We found a way for Debs to confirm consent without being directly involved in arranging the meet. It works for us | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I (Vinny) manage 95% of the admin of our profile. Why? Because initially Jo got involved and the messages just turned awful and relentless as soon as the guy knew it was Jo, " what you wearing?", " i wanna fuck you till you scream", " can you meet me without Vinny?" And then came the abuse if they were turned down. It very nearly killed the lifestyle before it started for us. So now I do the initial filtering in terms of what she likes and the limp messages, Jo reviews the ones I haven't deleted and picks her hotlist, who I then start to communicate with. I am always clear from the start how we manage our profile and we are well verified so it does work Whose idea was it to continue despite the relentlessly awful men looking for sex ? " Both because we got into the lifestyle via a different route, so we both knew we wanted to enjoy the lifestyle. To be clear there were some nice guys, not that I have to justify that, but why would anyone put up with being called a stag, whore, bitch and worse because they declined you. If you think that doesn't happen you're dreaming and if you think it's par for the course then you are part of the problem. You can't judge it if you haven't experienced it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I (Vinny) manage 95% of the admin of our profile. Why? Because initially Jo got involved and the messages just turned awful and relentless as soon as the guy knew it was Jo, " what you wearing?", " i wanna fuck you till you scream", " can you meet me without Vinny?" And then came the abuse if they were turned down. It very nearly killed the lifestyle before it started for us. So now I do the initial filtering in terms of what she likes and the limp messages, Jo reviews the ones I haven't deleted and picks her hotlist, who I then start to communicate with. I am always clear from the start how we manage our profile and we are well verified so it does work Whose idea was it to continue despite the relentlessly awful men looking for sex ? Both because we got into the lifestyle via a different route, so we both knew we wanted to enjoy the lifestyle. To be clear there were some nice guys, not that I have to justify that, but why would anyone put up with being called a stag, whore, bitch and worse because they declined you. If you think that doesn't happen you're dreaming and if you think it's par for the course then you are part of the problem. You can't judge it if you haven't experienced it." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I (Vinny) manage 95% of the admin of our profile. Why? Because initially Jo got involved and the messages just turned awful and relentless as soon as the guy knew it was Jo, " what you wearing?", " i wanna fuck you till you scream", " can you meet me without Vinny?" And then came the abuse if they were turned down. It very nearly killed the lifestyle before it started for us. So now I do the initial filtering in terms of what she likes and the limp messages, Jo reviews the ones I haven't deleted and picks her hotlist, who I then start to communicate with. I am always clear from the start how we manage our profile and we are well verified so it does work Whose idea was it to continue despite the relentlessly awful men looking for sex ? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her We wouldn't ever consider this, it's wrong in our eyes, and also you just don't know what goes on behind cloed doors, me personally (mrs) feels like this lifestyle is forced on some of these women, a form of domestic A**se! Maybe not..maybe it is ligit but we won't be a part of it just incase, but all of that aside, everyone should have a choice who they have sex with! In most of the genuine couples cases where the husband arranges the meets the wife has a choice and she has consented Most? It's not worth the risk. I guess that confirming consent just isn't important to some people. We found a way for Debs to confirm consent without being directly involved in arranging the meet. It works for us " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Claire knows that I know exactly what she likes and she's MORE than happy for for me to arrange meets. It's beyond me why people would have an issue with it. " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Claire knows that I know exactly what she likes and she's MORE than happy for for me to arrange meets. It's beyond me why people would have an issue with it. " How often do men check that she consents and is aware? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Claire knows that I know exactly what she likes and she's MORE than happy for for me to arrange meets. It's beyond me why people would have an issue with it. How often do men check that she consents and is aware?" because we have a social and chat first to make sure there is a connection. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It should be about the ladies pleasure. " It’s about both our pleasure. Feel you should only do what the other is comfortable and happy with | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Claire knows that I know exactly what she likes and she's MORE than happy for for me to arrange meets. It's beyond me why people would have an issue with it. How often do men check that she consents and is aware? because we have a social and chat first to make sure there is a connection." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe). How do you know it was missing? Sleeping and d*unk is clearly missing consent. It seems like you are only here to be clickbait so I'll leave you to pick at shit by yourself " No, she might have agreed while being commpas mentos, for the best wakeup surprise. In reality i don't know and nor does anybody else apart from the man and women mentioned (if actually real) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe). How do you know it was missing? Sleeping and d*unk is clearly missing consent. It seems like you are only here to be clickbait so I'll leave you to pick at shit by yourself No, she might have agreed while being commpas mentos, for the best wakeup surprise. In reality i don't know and nor does anybody else apart from the man and women mentioned (if actually real)" It's not to hard to know how law works surely, if someone consents at the time it's consent, if they consent to something then gets d*unk and falls asleep no lawyer will keep you out of jail and the hatred you'll get in jail will be deserved for the crime you commited Not you but "they" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe). How do you know it was missing? Sleeping and d*unk is clearly missing consent. It seems like you are only here to be clickbait so I'll leave you to pick at shit by yourself No, she might have agreed while being commpas mentos, for the best wakeup surprise. In reality i don't know and nor does anybody else apart from the man and women mentioned (if actually real) It's not to hard to know how law works surely, if someone consents at the time it's consent, if they consent to something then gets d*unk and falls asleep no lawyer will keep you out of jail and the hatred you'll get in jail will be deserved for the crime you commited Not you but "they" " And when the wife stands up in front of the court and says "yes I did consent"? Then nobody is going to jail as no crime was committed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"..... How do you know it was missing? Sleeping and d*unk is clearly missing consent. It seems like you are only here to be clickbait so I'll leave you to pick at shit by yourself No, she might have agreed while being commpas mentos, for the best wakeup surprise. In reality i don't know and nor does anybody else apart from the man and women mentioned (if actually real) It's not to hard to know how law works surely, if someone consents at the time it's consent, if they consent to something then gets d*unk and falls asleep no lawyer will keep you out of jail and the hatred you'll get in jail will be deserved for the crime you commited Not you but "they" And when the wife stands up in front of the court and says "yes I did consent"? Then nobody is going to jail as no crime was committed" Yes this! none of us know and can't know if there was or wasn't consent. Yes if a law is broken then punishment should follow, but not based on other peoples assumptions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" Yes, and no. Yes, as especially in recent years, I've had many messages from single male profiles (usually) wanting me to fuck/fill their wife/gf, who, it often transpires, either needs "persuading", or is unaware, or, in some instances, likely doesn't even exist... No, as on numerous occasions over the years, I've exchanged messages/texts/calls solely with the male half of a couple, and subsequently enjoyed visiting and playing with their wives! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" . Definitely, does she even exist if that is the case ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"maybe the wife cant be botherd with all the messages that come through and leaves the husband to sort and arrange meets as the husband knows what she likes and doesnt like etc messages like wana fuck ,fancy a shag,meet now ,im passing etc etc and others you wouldnt belive ,hence husbands tend to sort out meets then in a lot of meets and plus your meeting a couple not just the fem ,meets are getting more diff on here as a lot just treet it as tinder etc and are not willing to wait or make the effort ,but the ones that are get too meet ," Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"maybe the wife cant be botherd with all the messages that come through and leaves the husband to sort and arrange meets as the husband knows what she likes and doesnt like etc messages like wana fuck ,fancy a shag,meet now ,im passing etc etc and others you wouldnt belive ,hence husbands tend to sort out meets then in a lot of meets and plus your meeting a couple not just the fem ,meets are getting more diff on here as a lot just treet it as tinder etc and are not willing to wait or make the effort ,but the ones that are get too meet , Agreed " Have to say the male does most of the communication on here as it does my head in but if we were interested in a meet from here then I (fem) would get involved. I would expect the same the other end. I would expect a video or phone call with the fem before a meet was arranged. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I (Vinny) manage 95% of the admin of our profile. Why? Because initially Jo got involved and the messages just turned awful and relentless as soon as the guy knew it was Jo, " what you wearing?", " i wanna fuck you till you scream", " can you meet me without Vinny?" And then came the abuse if they were turned down. It very nearly killed the lifestyle before it started for us. So now I do the initial filtering in terms of what she likes and the limp messages, Jo reviews the ones I haven't deleted and picks her hotlist, who I then start to communicate with. I am always clear from the start how we manage our profile and we are well verified so it does work" Sounds a smart way to go about it. The guys, certainly me anyway do need to feel that the Mrs is 'in' on the process at least. I think there needs to be that bit of respect given to the guys as they do have justifiable apprehension. I appreciate its delicate and speaking to the Mrs could well ruin the kink. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once saw a “couple” (one of the rare instances I’m hoping it’s a fake) who posted an update along the lines of “Wife is sleeping after getting d*unk last night. Who wants to come and fuck her to wake her up?! ”. This is literally r*pe. The lack of awareness from some people is astounding. Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds? Is that a trick question? Both would be at fault, because the woman’s consent is clearly absent from the meeting being arranged and the resulting sexual encounter (a textbook r*pe). How do you know it was missing? Sleeping and d*unk is clearly missing consent. It seems like you are only here to be clickbait so I'll leave you to pick at shit by yourself No, she might have agreed while being commpas mentos, for the best wakeup surprise. In reality i don't know and nor does anybody else apart from the man and women mentioned (if actually real) It's not to hard to know how law works surely, if someone consents at the time it's consent, if they consent to something then gets d*unk and falls asleep no lawyer will keep you out of jail and the hatred you'll get in jail will be deserved for the crime you commited Not you but "they" And when the wife stands up in front of the court and says "yes I did consent"? Then nobody is going to jail as no crime was committed" I don’t think anyone in their right mind would consider sex with someone d*unk and asleep to be somehow acceptable, just because they have the word from their partner that she consented. It’s not just ethically terrible but a catastrophically bad decision to roll the dice on something that could realistically land you in prison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You'll find it's very common on here, the Male of the couple sending loads of winks and messages and the Wife has no clue. We've bumped into people in a club and the Wife had no idea they'd messaged us. So in your case the wife was a real person I have no chance of remembering those people i've contacted... whats so shocking?" It's a shame they're not memorable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who's at fault (if there is any fault) the husband fulfilling his wife's desires or the guy who responds?" The single guy has no way of knowing whether the wife has consented or not. - it's not enough to rely on the word of the husband. So he deserves all he gets. The husband is more complicated because she may have given him explicit written consent in advance, but the thing about consent is that you have the right to withdraw it at any time, for any reason. So it's a risky game for the husband, because if she wakes up and doesn't like the guy, she'd surely have no problem convincing a court it was non-consensual, because she didn't have the opportunity to withdraw her consent. In all our games, we should have a way for someone to withdraw consent. Playing without "safe words" may be a sexy fantasy for the person not in control, but we should keep it as a fantasy. But IANL... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wait a minute guys.. my Mrs is sick of all the time wasters, professional masturbators, fake accounts and messages like "wanna fuck?" From mordor lookalike creatures.. she had anough of it! Thankfully I have a little more patience than her. We both know exactly what we're looking for and we always speak behalf of both. We are genuine, verified and had a few meets. Just because I (the male half) spent more time answering to messages we are now suspects of a fake account?? What the hell? Lol " So, are you saying is that it's OK for couples to have red flags but how dare we single blokes have any and that we should be grateful for any attention because there are so many of us? I'm sorry but many of us have come across 'couples' profiles that are nothing of the sort and very clearly a bloke posing as a couple - they're easy to spot as the wife is always conveniently 'unavailable' or at work. It's also rather unsettling in that we only have hubbys word that she has consented to this setup. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wait a minute guys.. my Mrs is sick of all the time wasters, professional masturbators, fake accounts and messages like "wanna fuck?" From mordor lookalike creatures.. she had anough of it! Thankfully I have a little more patience than her. We both know exactly what we're looking for and we always speak behalf of both. We are genuine, verified and had a few meets. Just because I (the male half) spent more time answering to messages we are now suspects of a fake account?? What the hell? Lol So, are you saying is that it's OK for couples to have red flags but how dare we single blokes have any and that we should be grateful for any attention because there are so many of us? I'm sorry but many of us have come across 'couples' profiles that are nothing of the sort and very clearly a bloke posing as a couple - they're easy to spot as the wife is always conveniently 'unavailable' or at work. It's also rather unsettling in that we only have hubbys word that she has consented to this setup." Out of interest what if quite a few recent veris and they openly say female half just doesn’t come on Fab to message, hardly ever, but approves and wants to meet? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wait a minute guys.. my Mrs is sick of all the time wasters, professional masturbators, fake accounts and messages like "wanna fuck?" From mordor lookalike creatures.. she had anough of it! Thankfully I have a little more patience than her. We both know exactly what we're looking for and we always speak behalf of both. We are genuine, verified and had a few meets. Just because I (the male half) spent more time answering to messages we are now suspects of a fake account?? What the hell? Lol So, are you saying is that it's OK for couples to have red flags but how dare we single blokes have any and that we should be grateful for any attention because there are so many of us? I'm sorry but many of us have come across 'couples' profiles that are nothing of the sort and very clearly a bloke posing as a couple - they're easy to spot as the wife is always conveniently 'unavailable' or at work. It's also rather unsettling in that we only have hubbys word that she has consented to this setup. Out of interest what if quite a few recent veris and they openly say female half just doesn’t come on Fab to message, hardly ever, but approves and wants to meet? " Let me get this straight.. You're suggesting that someone should verify the fact that this is what the wife wants? Wtf | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So, are you saying is that it's OK for couples to have red flags but how dare we single blokes have any and that we should be grateful for any attention because there are so many of us? I'm sorry but many of us have come across 'couples' profiles that are nothing of the sort and very clearly a bloke posing as a couple - they're easy to spot as the wife is always conveniently 'unavailable' or at work. It's also rather unsettling in that we only have hubbys word that she has consented to this setup." It's upsetting for my Mrs to be approached in the rudest ape like way from people who feel entitled to the right to consider that they'd have a chance even though their effort was an absolute 0 physically and mentally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wait a minute guys.. my Mrs is sick of all the time wasters, professional masturbators, fake accounts and messages like "wanna fuck?" From mordor lookalike creatures.. she had anough of it! Thankfully I have a little more patience than her. We both know exactly what we're looking for and we always speak behalf of both. We are genuine, verified and had a few meets. Just because I (the male half) spent more time answering to messages we are now suspects of a fake account?? What the hell? Lol So, are you saying is that it's OK for couples to have red flags but how dare we single blokes have any and that we should be grateful for any attention because there are so many of us? I'm sorry but many of us have come across 'couples' profiles that are nothing of the sort and very clearly a bloke posing as a couple - they're easy to spot as the wife is always conveniently 'unavailable' or at work. It's also rather unsettling in that we only have hubbys word that she has consented to this setup. Out of interest what if quite a few recent veris and they openly say female half just doesn’t come on Fab to message, hardly ever, but approves and wants to meet? Let me get this straight.. You're suggesting that someone should verify the fact that this is what the wife wants? Wtf" No i wasn't but think Horny DJ might have been. I also have a couples profile like you and do the vast majority of the arranging. I get why people can be skeptical and i am of others sometimes. For me one of the key things is relatively recent veris. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pm to see my wife " Why if you are a single lad | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it's because they aren't available right there and then, no we wouldn't be suspicious. However, we would expect a time for a phone call to be provided in the near future. If you can't speak to the wife or female half at all stop wasting your time. They're won't talk on a phone but will meet for sex? Nah, don't think so." This describe me and my partner . To be fair hardly anyone even asks for a phone call - we have lots of veris and they seem to be enough for most. If somebody did we might say yes but we don’t like giving out numbers as so many problems over the years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" 1st of all around 80% of single males on here are weirdos why would any guy in a couple expose her to these creeps unless she so desired which my half most certainly doesnt now it clearly states on our profile what one says goes for the other and this really pisses off guys because they have control issues and they believe women on fab cam be manipulated so when they can't chat to them it really gets to them which is good because it helps show their character those same 80% also seem to be illiterate and can't read a profile before messaging most women have zero patience for this and if she was the main one having to filter through the idiots almost every guy would get blocked instantly and we would be as well deleting the fab account then it depends on the dynamics of the couple in question for us like a lot of couples not all but a lot single males are literally just human dildos she has no desire to talk to yous meet yous on her own have a social or anything else yous can think of so there's no need for her to chat to single guys at all and she is more than happy for me to arrange meets the fact is if you don't like a couples dynamic block and move on couldn't be any simpler | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" This seems to come up alot! I Tom do all the admin, Sarah would just be freaked out if she saw 90% of awful messages we get sent through, if you cant speak to me we are not going to be compatible anyway. So far our meets have been very succesfull and none of them have questioned me running and arranging the meets on our behalf. The same thing applies to everyone on here if you dont like the way someone does things move on and find a better match. Not doing something theway you want it doesnt mean fake. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I....the male...do tend to make most the contacts. However, once an interest is made and a meet looks like happening we are both fully involved. She actually prefurs this as dosnt have the patience to message. So long as she is kept in the loop. X " Yeah this is us too. Mr does most of the initial winks and introducing messages. If there’s any plans for a meet we’ll both be aware but it can take a lot of work to arrange a good meet so he puts in that initial legwork first. I’m not saying this is always the case but it works well for us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So would you be suspicious of male half arranging "wife's" meets and not being able chat direct to her" I, the male arrange our meets, not ‘the wife’s’ meets. She is obviously involved and decides whether she wants to progress things whether we or they instigate the meet. She has zero interest in speaking to anyone online or offline prior to a social, the way nearly all our meets with couples begin. We will have plenty of time to talk then. It may sound awful, and someone said as much earlier, but our rare meets with single males are to scratch an itch, normally at short notice. We don’t want conversation. That said, we have tried our best to select nice people when we have scratched that itch. We have never had anyone even ask for a phone call with either of us prior to a meet, they have just accepted we are genuine or have been prepared to risk we are. Neither have we ever asked. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |