 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Is there any chance admin could find a way to make it so that if I send a message to someone on here, it will show up in her mailbox via a queueing system as opposed to the current last messaged recieved being at the top of the list?
Because the system currently being as it is, its utterly pointless sending a woman a message when shes offline, as chances are that when she finally logs back in it will be 254th in the queue. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is there any chance admin could find a way to make it so that if I send a message to someone on here, it will show up in her mailbox via a queueing system as opposed to the current last messaged recieved being at the top of the list?
Because the system currently being as it is, its utterly pointless sending a woman a message when shes offline, as chances are that when she finally logs back in it will be 254th in the queue. "
So you're more important than anyone else then being the tardiest in answering.
Get in the queue and wait your turn!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
You misunderstand me - what I'm saying is that the MOST RECENT message a woman recieves will get priority in her inbox, as opposed to getting to the back of the line where it should be.
I tested this out by mailing myself twice, and sure enough, the second of those messages was placed highest. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Oh come ooooooon, you know as well as I do that most people on here click into there boxes and read from the first thing that pops up on screen. I once had to mail a girl the same message back to back TEN TIMES before she was even able to read it and reply, and then I had to send the response to that THIRTY TIMES over a period of several days.
Yes its alot of effort and slightly psycho but hey! She was a babe x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
As in, more psycho than not at all psycho, less than quite a bit psycho, and MUCH less than totally 'cut your own ear off and marinade it in butter with a side helping of mushrooms' psycho
Are we clear now? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
