FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Scotland > Trans fans

Trans fans

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Opinions on whether swinger's or fab guys is best for a lustful trans woman?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ara JTV/TS  over a year ago

Bristol East

I've no complaints

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think it depends what type of guy you want to attract... if your happy with openly bi, gay and other trans hook-ups maybe that would have an easier or wider choice. I do know that some trans, ts and gay men have a HUGE thing for straight men.

God knows I used to get enough messages before blocking men...

So depends what you want I think!

Just be happy

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Opinions on whether swinger's or fab guys is best for a lustful trans woman? "

Hedge your bets and try on both sites?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *othianGuy41Man  over a year ago

Eureka

I tried both sites but didn’t agree with having to subscribe to both. I think this one is better. I got the impression that trans people weren’t welcome on fab guys, unfortunately. X

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

hm ok. tough to know the answer as the answer I want is more sex. on here I compete with bio female. on fab guys..justguys. im in the middle. I like both. I want both. I cant have both though lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *illie99TV/TS  over a year ago

Central Scotland

Whilst you are right there is more competition I think there is a far bigger pot to fish in here. I get messaged by far more (fab)straight guys than bi guys on fabswingers and certainly get more messages than I do on fabguys.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *V-AliceTV/TS  over a year ago

Ayr

I've tried them both. In my opinion, it's better on here.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

To be honest I think both are just as good...

But mainly same guys atleast you get the bonus of ladies on here if that's what you like

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ecky400TV/TS  over a year ago

/highlands

Bith are about same. I get as many messages on both xxxx

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iceandtightMan  over a year ago

Aberdeen

I find both are about the same although fabguys I find I get more genuine guys. There are alot of wanabe guys or ones that like the idea if things but are scared to take the step into making it real on swingers.

However OP with looks like yours im sure you will have your pick of guys on either site x x x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Thanks everyone. I guess being on both works. I do like swingers though I feel the men here want a high standard of TV/ts. The standard is incredible I think.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *utiee26TV/TS  over a year ago

Carluke

I prefer proper straight guys as I class myself as a girl so this site is by far better for me I do have a profile on fab guys too but don’t really like the gentlemen who message me on there x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Hey _utiee26. Yeh I get you and agree. Love this scene however if I'm honest romance would be better. So soppy lol x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *exyangietgirlTV/TS  over a year ago

edinburgh

In general, I find this site better although f'guys is OK too.

XX

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0312

0