It staggers believe that HMRC have the guile, skill but with the unweaning lust to hound and pound the normal guy on the street to pay overdue taxes. Been there before, done it, and agree with this principle.
But what fookin riles me is listening to that sanctimonious Chief Executive of HMRC trying to defend the incompetence's of HER staff in pursuing the 10.000's tax evader who have been hiding money in Swiss accounts with full assistance and support by the Banks.
Chief Executives like this should be sacked for gross misconduct and incompetence. 
The coming ballot box should hopefully bring a new Governmentt, with some balls to address this problem, but I'm not too confident on that either |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *976scottMan
over a year ago
North Lanarkshire |
Totally agree the government whoever it is has to go after all the Tax Avoiders such as big companies who pay less than 1% yet benefit from our country!
As said on the last leg!
"Do your bit you dicks"!!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *wiftieeMan
over a year ago
near Glasgow |
" Chief Executives like this should be sacked for gross misconduct and incompetence.
The coming ballot box should hopefully bring a new Governmentt, with some balls to address this problem, but I'm not too confident on that either"
Before the present coalition, we had Labourites Brown and Blair, supposedly defending and supporting the working class. But did they do anything about the tax dodgers and avoiders? Not a thing.
However, the common denominator in all of this is ..........the civil service. 'Yes Minister' wasn't just a whimsical comedy, the simple fact is that it's the civil service that runs the country.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" Chief Executives like this should be sacked for gross misconduct and incompetence.
The coming ballot box should hopefully bring a new Governmentt, with some balls to address this problem, but I'm not too confident on that either
Before the present coalition, we had Labourites Brown and Blair, supposedly defending and supporting the working class. But did they do anything about the tax dodgers and avoiders? Not a thing.
However, the common denominator in all of this is ..........the civil service. 'Yes Minister' wasn't just a whimsical comedy, the simple fact is that it's the civil service that runs the country. "
Very true  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" Chief Executives like this should be sacked for gross misconduct and incompetence.
The coming ballot box should hopefully bring a new Governmentt, with some balls to address this problem, but I'm not too confident on that either
Before the present coalition, we had Labourites Brown and Blair, supposedly defending and supporting the working class. But did they do anything about the tax dodgers and avoiders? Not a thing.
However, the common denominator in all of this is ..........the civil service. 'Yes Minister' wasn't just a whimsical comedy, the simple fact is that it's the civil service that runs the country. "
Regrettably it wasn't the comedy we all thought it was, in truth it was a documentary and things will never change  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oznrayCouple
over a year ago
helensburgh |
without going all political here, the is a big difference from tax avoidance and tax evasion. usually joe blogs does evasion when they get hounded about tax owed, which is usually evasion, where as those that can afford a decent accountant is avoidance which isn't breaking the law, if you could pay less tax legally would you? anyone that answers no to that is a liar!
ray |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"without going all political here, the is a big difference from tax avoidance and tax evasion. usually joe blogs does evasion when they get hounded about tax owed, which is usually evasion, where as those that can afford a decent accountant is avoidance which isn't breaking the law, if you could pay less tax legally would you? anyone that answers no to that is a liar!
ray"
well quoted +1 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
