When I 1st joined 11 years ago, it was not far off equal 1/1. I've seen an increase in guys, guys pretending to be couples, guys pretending to be women, guys posing as someone else.
I had a message off a couple a few years back implying I was a catfish as they had been chatting to me on a differant username, turns out someone had stole my pictures and made a catfish account.
Place is rubbish now but still have old friends to keep in touch with. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ndiiiMan
over a year ago
Paisley Scotland |
"When I 1st joined 11 years ago, it was not far off equal 1/1. I've seen an increase in guys, guys pretending to be couples, guys pretending to be women, guys posing as someone else.
I had a message off a couple a few years back implying I was a catfish as they had been chatting to me on a differant username, turns out someone had stole my pictures and made a catfish account.
Place is rubbish now but still have old friends to keep in touch with."
100% |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
A quick use of the search utility shows a clear ratio of over 75:1 M to F within 75 miles of Aberdeen.
This makes the site useless as a casual or NSA sex site for men. However that is the problem with this site. 95% of men use it for casual sex. Not 'Swinging'.
Swinging has always been about couples play, couples finding the elusive unicorn for MFF or FF exploration and clubs and sex parties. I would estimate that less than 10% of couples or single women are looking for single males.
Ironically if the site were to 'balance' the ratio it would instantly go bust. Males pay for 95% of the site and couples and single females use free accounts in the majority.
To summarise this is a site for couples, bi and curious females and a small % that are looking for single males.
This is a generalisation, with a broad brush stroke, but holds up to scrutiny.
If you are looking for casual or NSA sex look elsewhere. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
That's a fair point, if you look at all members online, the delta is huge, no argument there.
But once you take away the fakes, the fantasists, the wallpapers/time wasters? I think the number of folk genuinely looking for fun must be closer to even.
The challenge I find is wading through the nonsense  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *azzle99Woman
over a year ago
Edinburgh |
So many guys don’t understand they have signed up to ‘Fab Swingers’ and think it’s ‘Fab Singles’!
However, far too many want the elusive MFF they’ve always dreamed of, and wouldn’t dare be near another guy in MMF. It’s not a porn site, definitely somewhere to live out all your wildest dreams, just make sure those dreams are wide ranging and you’re in for a good time! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It seems strange that single guys can't get meets. Nearly every couple I just browsed locally had a single guy on their veris. I guess those guys meeting don't have time (or the inclination) to post on this forum. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Me personnelly don't give a damn about the Ratio i use the site more so to look at all the Funny and not so funny forum posts , me thinks people take this site way too seriously just look at the Ratio off serious posts to humour ones .
Away bk in the day banter was the main thing in the forums now site has had to add new topics ( i fully understand and get it ) . Sometimes newer things can waste a site .TA  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
