FabSwingers.com > Forums > Scotland > Use up to much ?
Use up to much ?
Jump to: Newest in thread
Use up to much : excess use of hand sanitiser ? Excess use of toilet roll ? ( allowable in cases of excess sh*t ) .
Use up to much : often hated modern use of text speak ( usually by younger folk ) using less characters which is mostly of little use now as the amount of characters you can use in a message has increased .
Most couples I’ve read profiles of and seen posts about messages , prefer a message that’s to both of them stating what interest both parties Have in common and Is polite . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"use", "yous" or "Uz" all irritate me.
When we get a "Use up to much?" type message I'm always tempted to give a very literal reply, "I've just finished scrubbing the toilet and now I'm about to go & empty the kitchen bin, then I have a pile of laundry to fold".
K |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *sm265Woman
over a year ago
Shangri-la |
Not a couple, so don't claim to speak on their behalf, but I think it'd definitely depend on the context & whether it was part of an on going conversation. I can understand why there might be confusion though because a lot of people don't like/use text speak.
If that was an initial message, & that was all that it said, then I'm not sure it'd inspire a response. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andsCouple
over a year ago
Edin |
"Not a couple, so don't claim to speak on their behalf, but I think it'd definitely depend on the context & whether it was part of an on going conversation. I can understand why there might be confusion though because a lot of people don't like/use text speak.
If that was an initial message, & that was all that it said, then I'm not sure it'd inspire a response. "
I agree, if this was the message I wouldn’t respond! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andsCouple
over a year ago
Edin |
"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards? "
It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?
It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply. "
It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.
It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?
It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.
It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.
It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances
"
So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Cunts be hating on rappers next for the rhymes.
Let it slide folks,Up start crows one pile a shite. "
Well said bruv....haterz gonna hate...innit....Westside |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?
It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.
It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.
It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances
So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. . "
Not really
Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.
What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?
It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.
It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.
It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances
So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .
Not really
Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.
What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum. "
So you want physical attraction others want mental attraction/ stimulation and a lazy worded first message does not stimulate that attraction.
As for your second point , nothing creepy about it , I believe we swapped messages about the forums a few times and we certainly had more than 2 or 3 replies with each other in the forums. I regularly check out the profiles of people I interact with on the forums and your 5 point list stuck in my mind as being quite shallow . That's why I thought a bit hypocritical that you should comment about others not entertaining a message like the OP stated. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?
It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.
It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.
It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances
So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .
Not really
Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.
What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum.
So you want physical attraction others want mental attraction/ stimulation and a lazy worded first message does not stimulate that attraction.
As for your second point , nothing creepy about it , I believe we swapped messages about the forums a few times and we certainly had more than 2 or 3 replies with each other in the forums. I regularly check out the profiles of people I interact with on the forums and your 5 point list stuck in my mind as being quite shallow . That's why I thought a bit hypocritical that you should comment about others not entertaining a message like the OP stated. "
Never swapped a message with you before. A couple of forum posts I’ve quoted and vice versa but only a handful at most and you have been blocked for months.
You may think being attracted to a certain type is shallow but you also said people should let their dogs shit in the house during the pandemic so I don’t think I’ll worry to much about it 
Maybe I should be flattered you took such an interest in the profile but having been blocked for so long it seems slightly more than an interest. Tell the truth you have another profile to see all the people who have blocked you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What if the person sending the message was dyslexic or had some sort of issue that prevented them writing or spelling properly. Holly willoughby and Tom cruise, for example, both have dyslexia. Would you bin a message from them or give a cheeky reply if their message wasn’t up to your standards?
It’s not about being up to standard, I couldn’t care less if people can’t spell I knew what it ment ... but if that was the initial message I still wouldn’t reply.
It might just be that someone lacks confidence in their writing (or texting) skills because of their spelling or ability to put their words into text so they keep it short. There’s continual threads on spelling, message context etc so it wont do these people any good when they come on the forum and see these threads.
It might be a laziness, it might be they’ve messaged 100 people with a great message without reply and became disheartened or it might be they are in non fab company but look get meet later on and can’t put massive effort into a message at that time. Anyway my point is i wouldn’t judge a profile that appeals to us based on the initial message as I have no idea of the other people’s circumstances
So you have a 1 to 5 list of things people should or shouldn't be for you to base your decision on who to meet or speak to , but other people can't base their decision on a first message. ?? . My favourite word springs to mind , hypocrisy. .
Not really
Our 1 to 5 list is mostly about physical attraction and what we look for.
What is strange and rather creepy is that you have been blocked for a while yet know what’s on our profile. So you either have another profile where you can see ours or have a fantastic memory that memorises a profile of a couple you have never spoken with out with 2 or 3 reply’s on the forum.
So you want physical attraction others want mental attraction/ stimulation and a lazy worded first message does not stimulate that attraction.
As for your second point , nothing creepy about it , I believe we swapped messages about the forums a few times and we certainly had more than 2 or 3 replies with each other in the forums. I regularly check out the profiles of people I interact with on the forums and your 5 point list stuck in my mind as being quite shallow . That's why I thought a bit hypocritical that you should comment about others not entertaining a message like the OP stated.
Never swapped a message with you before. A couple of forum posts I’ve quoted and vice versa but only a handful at most and you have been blocked for months.
You may think being attracted to a certain type is shallow but you also said people should let their dogs shit in the house during the pandemic so I don’t think I’ll worry to much about it
Maybe I should be flattered you took such an interest in the profile but having been blocked for so long it seems slightly more than an interest. Tell the truth you have another profile to see all the people who have blocked you "
Haha , the dog shit thing was said before I knew these pandemic rule breakers had gardens lol. Just think how many lives would have been saved if everyone had stuck to the rules. Auld Cummings took pelters for testing his eyesight, Scotlands CMO resigned for a jolly to her second home and yet irresponsible dog owners carried on as normal, damn tooting let those dogs shit at home. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
. 