FabSwingers.com > Forums > Scotland > Unpopular Shags
Unpopular Shags
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I have always had a thing for Nicola Sturgeon, i know there will be folk spitting tea all over the place, but i really find her sexy As fk, Anyone got any what may be considered an unpopular shag.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I have always had a thing for Nicola Sturgeon, i know there will be folk spitting tea all over the place, but i really find her sexy As fk, Anyone got any what may be considered an unpopular shag. "
Frank get the door ma feet are killing mi!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I have always had a thing for Nicola Sturgeon, i know there will be folk spitting tea all over the place, but i really find her sexy As fk, Anyone got any what may be considered an unpopular shag. "
No I have extremly good taste in men  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don't think any of you took heed of my words up there ^^^^ 
Why should anyone listen to you in particular?
Cos it was good advice of course "
Wise and modest too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I think you will find that the original comment was open to both sexes, and can also point out, that it wasn't really that serious a thread, and I think you will find that both sexes commented on the post, im not sure of any history or who likes who, but the post about the locker room may well have been a joke im not sure, but it felt a little of topic, i my opinion  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys "
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum. "
This ^^^
There is always someone wanting to twist and manipulate what the actual post was about it!
Its was open to everyone not just one sex |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum. "
I thought the rules on forum threads were simple, there meant to be fun. Add to that if you don't like the subject matter then you should ignore it and pass it by.
Since certain inividuals are breaking those simple rules by excerisin her right to comment on any thread she chooses by showing her dislike to those threads instead of simply passing them by , then any comments made to her in response are most definitely brought on by herself. No one attacked her or went looking to make comments against her until she came into the thread attacking other people's posts.
Again if this thread upsets her then ignore and move on. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum.
I thought the rules on forum threads were simple, there meant to be fun. Add to that if you don't like the subject matter then you should ignore it and pass it by.
Since certain inividuals are breaking those simple rules by excerisin her right to comment on any thread she chooses by showing her dislike to those threads instead of simply passing them by , then any comments made to her in response are most definitely brought on by herself. No one attacked her or went looking to make comments against her until she came into the thread attacking other people's posts.
Again if this thread upsets her then ignore and move on. "
Watch out Martin Luther King is on the case now.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum.
I thought the rules on forum threads were simple, there meant to be fun. Add to that if you don't like the subject matter then you should ignore it and pass it by.
Since certain inividuals are breaking those simple rules by excerisin her right to comment on any thread she chooses by showing her dislike to those threads instead of simply passing them by , then any comments made to her in response are most definitely brought on by herself. No one attacked her or went looking to make comments against her until she came into the thread attacking other people's posts.
Again if this thread upsets her then ignore and move on.
Watch out Martin Luther King is on the case now...."
I just thought of someone who fits the criteria of the OP.
And it's not MLK |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum. "
i think the OP was aimed at both sexes, i took the comment that people don't seem to like to be in response to some of the not so well worded answers just above it ... which were all male talking about women in what i would think of as a pretty sh*tty way
maybe ive interpreted wrong |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum.
i think the OP was aimed at both sexes, i took the comment that people don't seem to like to be in response to some of the not so well worded answers just above it ... which were all male talking about women in what i would think of as a pretty sh*tty way
maybe ive interpreted wrong "
The thread title is unpopular shags, lol.
People could just bypass it from there if they felt it might get unsavoury. ?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum.
i think the OP was aimed at both sexes, i took the comment that people don't seem to like to be in response to some of the not so well worded answers just above it ... which were all male talking about women in what i would think of as a pretty sh*tty way
maybe ive interpreted wrong "
You took it exactly as intended. I'm not sure why everyone else struggled to see that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum.
i think the OP was aimed at both sexes, i took the comment that people don't seem to like to be in response to some of the not so well worded answers just above it ... which were all male talking about women in what i would think of as a pretty sh*tty way
maybe ive interpreted wrong
The thread title is unpopular shags, lol.
People could just bypass it from there if they felt it might get unsavoury. ?? "
theres unsavoury as in this is my guilty pleasure bet nobody else find them attractive and then there is unsavoury “shes a dirty with a slack jaw i could fit my balls and cock in at the same time”
different scale i think |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Let's call a spade a spade....this isn't the first or last time people will post for sheer antagonistic purposes. Whether it's calling Nicola sturgeon a "wee dirty" or posting nothing to do with the actual post for a reaction.
Anyway....I'd still ride James Corden. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"jeezo, i know there is a history beyond this thread and one specific post, its apparent who is liked and who is not and wether in general posts merit this kind of opposition isn't really for me to say...
but can nobody see that you are hammering a women here for telling guys talking about women in what is clearly a derogatory way, that it probably wont impress anyone but those other guys
I actually have to disagree. The post was aimed at either sex. The op was admitting to wanting to pump nicola sturgeon. Then as per, the response from certain people isn't either lighthearted or constructive to the original post. Why can't a post which should actually just be pure nonsense and a laugh stay that way?
Just my thoughts though. I see it time and time again in the Scottish forum.
i think the OP was aimed at both sexes, i took the comment that people don't seem to like to be in response to some of the not so well worded answers just above it ... which were all male talking about women in what i would think of as a pretty sh*tty way
maybe ive interpreted wrong
The thread title is unpopular shags, lol.
People could just bypass it from there if they felt it might get unsavoury. ??
theres unsavoury as in this is my guilty pleasure bet nobody else find them attractive and then there is unsavoury “shes a dirty with a slack jaw i could fit my balls and cock in at the same time”
different scale i think "
So it's OK to say , I'd shag so n so even though most people probably thinks she's a dog.
You said the same thing in a nicer way.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
So it's OK to say , I'd shag so n so even though most people probably thinks she's a dog.
You said the same thing in a nicer way. "
That's not a nicer way |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
So it's OK to say , I'd shag so n so even though most people probably thinks she's a dog.
You said the same thing in a nicer way.
That's not a nicer way "
You still in the locker room. ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Judith Ralston......the end! "
Not buying that, she is definitely not an unpopular shag. Many, many people would love to get hold of her. Myself included. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Judith Ralston......the end!
Not buying that, she is definitely not an unpopular shag. Many, many people would love to get hold of her. Myself included. "
Splits opinion in my friendship group but what do the nay-sayers know...they're daft.
And she has a lovely set of pipes for real - former opera singer |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Henry Cavill. Only living guy I’d go Fab straight for. The other would have been Jim Morrison but hey. Necrophilia is going too far. "
Why am I not surprised you’d go for Superman? 
Mine? Hmm Kate Beckinsdale
it’s those corsets and wet-look catsuits
Millie x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'm not a fan of the 'guilty pleasure' or 'unpopular crush' notion; attraction and enjoyment are so subjective and personal, it's always struck me as a bit silly to say liking a particular thing/person should be considered embarrassing.
I've been told my attraction to Tim Curry is odd, and Dara O'briain. I think Tim is wickedly sexy and seductive. Dara just seems really likeable, and he's so big and broad I think he'd be great to snuggle. I've also always thought Dawn French has a gorgeous smile. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
