FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Scientific Advice.
Scientific Advice.
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?"
Sssh, let him have his fun |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?"
Coronovirus won't help Boris's family avoid paying taxes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?
Sssh, let him have his fun"
Ok, let us substitute the word scientist with the word experts.
Boris following expert advice now , but expert advice said Brexit is bad .
What changed? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eavenNhellCouple
over a year ago
carrbrook stalybridge |
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?
Sssh, let him have his fun
Ok, let us substitute the word scientist with the word experts.
Boris following expert advice now , but expert advice said Brexit is bad .
What changed? "
when it all goes to shit he can blame it all the "Experts" as he listened to them nowt to do with me guv |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?
Sssh, let him have his fun
Ok, let us substitute the word scientist with the word experts.
Boris following expert advice now , but expert advice said Brexit is bad .
What changed? "
Because the current expert advice isn't going against people's agendas  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?
Sssh, let him have his fun
Ok, let us substitute the word scientist with the word experts.
Boris following expert advice now , but expert advice said Brexit is bad .
What changed?
Because the current expert advice isn't going against people's agendas "
OOOOO and again you are on a roll son.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?
Sssh, let him have his fun
Ok, let us substitute the word scientist with the word experts.
Boris following expert advice now , but expert advice said Brexit is bad .
What changed?
Because the current expert advice isn't going against people's agendas OOOOO and again you are on a roll son. "
You're very presumptuous today mate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The answer is free issue "nightnurse". Flipping hell that stuff spaces me out in the mornings. I really felt like Neil off The young ones this morning after I went to bed on a dose. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In times of a pandemic should i use Boris's opinion on what to do, or public health England's?"
What about in cases of climate change. Listen to scientists who spend years studying and understanding the mechanisms behind it. Or Boris's? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"In times of a pandemic should i use Boris's opinion on what to do, or public health England's?
What about in cases of climate change. Listen to scientists who spend years studying and understanding the mechanisms behind it. Or Boris's?"
Has boris denied climate change ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In times of a pandemic should i use Boris's opinion on what to do, or public health England's?
What about in cases of climate change. Listen to scientists who spend years studying and understanding the mechanisms behind it. Or Boris's?
Has boris denied climate change ?"
He has stated he's skeptical and doesn't understand it.
But I was more poking fun at the poster who is a well known climate change denier. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"In times of a pandemic should i use Boris's opinion on what to do, or public health England's?
What about in cases of climate change. Listen to scientists who spend years studying and understanding the mechanisms behind it. Or Boris's?
Has boris denied climate change ?"
I'm sure a lucrative business in carbon credits could sway him... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyukMan
over a year ago
West London |
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought"
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *obka3Couple
over a year ago
bournemouth |
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone."
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone.
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess."
Well actually
Prediction of the The spread and impact of the virus is exactly that predicting the movements and actions and habits and opinions of billions of individual humans on the planet
The virus is easy to understand the human interactions causing its spread not so and human reactions to advice even less so
But yes you live in your bubble thinking Brexit prediction no more than a roulette wheel
And virus prediction as solid as the si unit for a kg
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone.
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess."
And those 40 million little decisions include buying toilet roll because they saw it on TV. How more predictable can it get lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It all depends on who is wanted to be the object of responsibility or for shouldering any blame. He likes to take credit for anything potentially positive, even if lies but is creepily irresponsibile otherwise.
This week we suddenly have 10,000 likely infections - without mention that he's been in charge throughout that time. Suddenly getting the majority of the population infected is a goal, now it's supposedly experts calling the shots. Die happy, as it wasn't him.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *asyukMan
over a year ago
West London |
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone.
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess."
Now it appears that the scientific advice is being overturned because fear is making people demand the closure of events.
We are now going to do what every other country is doing. We are not trusting in our own data and process. We are following everyone else.
Our much vaunted prize of independent action ditched at the first test because of anger at government "inaction" even though it is thought out. Point proven. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone.
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess.
Now it appears that the scientific advice is being overturned because fear is making people demand the closure of events.
We are now going to do what every other country is doing. We are not trusting in our own data and process. We are following everyone else.
Our much vaunted prize of independent action ditched at the first test because of anger at government "inaction" even though it is thought out. Point proven."
Indeed, nice to see everyone ignoring Boris the Baffoons advice |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone.
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess.
Now it appears that the scientific advice is being overturned because fear is making people demand the closure of events.
We are now going to do what every other country is doing. We are not trusting in our own data and process. We are following everyone else.
Our much vaunted prize of independent action ditched at the first test because of anger at government "inaction" even though it is thought out. Point proven."
"Now it appears that the scientific advice is being overturned because fear is making people demand the closure of events."
An all too familiar pattern for how this country is governed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone.
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess.
Now it appears that the scientific advice is being overturned because fear is making people demand the closure of events.
We are now going to do what every other country is doing. We are not trusting in our own data and process. We are following everyone else.
Our much vaunted prize of independent action ditched at the first test because of anger at government "inaction" even though it is thought out. Point proven.
"Now it appears that the scientific advice is being overturned because fear is making people demand the closure of events."
An all too familiar pattern for how this country is governed."
At this moment "the virus" does not frighten me
At this moment herd mentality humans do
Humans fear and misinformation are a recipe for all manner of irrational unpredictable quite nasty behaviour
The tribal camp lines are already being drawn |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Medical "experts" are scientists who deal in facts and do experiments to prove their theories. they are dealing in this case with one virus and how it will behave compared to all the other viruses.
Economists use guesses even if they are educated ones to make predictions about how in the case of the UK 40 plus million adults will react to certain economic news etc etc, each action will generate a reaction so on and so forth, hence my term guess.
If you cant see the difference between these two types of experts then give it some thought
No. It's not really that different at all.
Both virologists and epidemiologists study precious desease to understand how they function biologically and how they spread. They also use simulations based on previous data to try to extrapolate what will happen with a new outbreak. However, these are approximations using available, bit incomplete data and experience.
Economics is much the same when not politicised.
People will believe experts if they are scared and need reassurance. People do not believe experts when they are angry and want to blame someone.
We are dealing with one virus not 40 million adults taking 40 million little decisions that added together each day make any prediction a guess.
Now it appears that the scientific advice is being overturned because fear is making people demand the closure of events.
We are now going to do what every other country is doing. We are not trusting in our own data and process. We are following everyone else.
Our much vaunted prize of independent action ditched at the first test because of anger at government "inaction" even though it is thought out. Point proven.
Indeed, nice to see everyone ignoring Boris the Baffoons advice "
It happened for the first time |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?"
The vast majority of scientists campaigned against Brexit, due to the negative effects it would have on the work they do. They weren't listened to.
Most of them still aren't, sadly. If you think everyone is washing their hands, well ... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?
The vast majority of scientists campaigned against Brexit, due to the negative effects it would have on the work they do. They weren't listened to.
Most of them still aren't, sadly. If you think everyone is washing their hands, well ... "
Brexiteers somehow managed to twist the word "expert" into a negative term meaning someone not worth listening to.
Just read the comments on here. How many times do you see the phrase "so called experts".
Look how easy is it is to convince people of anything.
Climate change isn't real
Brexit is good
Etc
People would vote for the Coronovirus if Boris wrote it on the side of a bus and told them to. What do these so called experts know anyway!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Boris following scientific advice now, but scientific advice said Brexit is bad.
What changed?I dont think scientists got involved in brexit did they?
Sssh, let him have his fun
Ok, let us substitute the word scientist with the word experts.
Boris following expert advice now , but expert advice said Brexit is bad .
What changed? "
The situation and circumstances?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The answer is free issue "nightnurse". Flipping hell that stuff spaces me out in the mornings. I really felt like Neil off The young ones this morning after I went to bed on a dose."
That is phenomenal shit! I sleep like a log after a dose of that. Hell yea, free nightnurse for everyone!!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
