FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > the COVID 19 thread (lets keep it to this one)
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thought if we were going to talk about it, it would be sensible to just keep it to the one thread on here.... anyway ... moving on from the last thread, we know this morning that the governments worse case scenario is for 100,000 deaths...... when you put it like that... yes we should all keep calm, and it still hits home...." Worse case scenario says it all i would be worried if the government were not looking at worse case scenarios. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think I’ll pay attention to advice from experts, mainly because they’re experts and the hysteria on various forums is rife." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think I’ll pay attention to advice from experts, mainly because they’re experts and the hysteria on various forums is rife." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah but will be mainly elderly people who have had a full life" How nasty and sick can you get you will be old one day,is this how you want your parents to die? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah but will be mainly elderly people who have had a full lifeHow nasty and sick can you get you will be old one day,is this how you want your parents to die?" While I agree with you and I'm certainly not ready to go I am relieved that it doesn't affect kids as much as the older generation, I would rather die than my grandkids,, they have their whole life in front of them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah but will be mainly elderly people who have had a full lifeHow nasty and sick can you get you will be old one day,is this how you want your parents to die?" Ffs.... it’s called irony, sarcasm, humour, tongue in cheek. Oh never mind -you wouldn’t understand | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah but will be mainly elderly people who have had a full lifeHow nasty and sick can you get you will be old one day,is this how you want your parents to die? Ffs.... it’s called irony, sarcasm, humour, tongue in cheek. Oh never mind -you wouldn’t understand " It is in very poor taste | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thought if we were going to talk about it, it would be sensible to just keep it to the one thread on here.... anyway ... moving on from the last thread, we know this morning that the governments worse case scenario is for 100,000 deaths...... when you put it like that... yes we should all keep calm, and it still hits home...." Can you link me to the 100,000 deaths estimate? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah but will be mainly elderly people who have had a full lifeHow nasty and sick can you get you will be old one day,is this how you want your parents to die? Ffs.... it’s called irony, sarcasm, humour, tongue in cheek. Oh never mind -you wouldn’t understand It is in very poor taste" So's marmite, but some people still like it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One thing wrong with the ‘man-made’ theory is the virus’ lack of exclusivity. Why release a novel virus with no means to control its spread and effect?" There's always the possibility of an lab accident. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One thing wrong with the ‘man-made’ theory is the virus’ lack of exclusivity. Why release a novel virus with no means to control its spread and effect?" I think cos something went wrong in the lab or they underestimated its side effects as it cant be stopped, there are roumors that bill gates could be involved as well. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thought if we were going to talk about it, it would be sensible to just keep it to the one thread on here.... anyway ... moving on from the last thread, we know this morning that the governments worse case scenario is for 100,000 deaths...... when you put it like that... yes we should all keep calm, and it still hits home...." If this is the governments worst case scenario, it is an order of magnitude underestimate for deaths. Detected cases are rising exponentially. The only successes is slowing the spread have been countries that have essentially stopped all public events and put whole cities into quarantine. Government action in the uk is too little, too late. Worst case would be 80 to 90% of the population becoming infected. Global death rates are currently running at 3.4% of those contracting the disease. Uk population is approx 68 million, 80% infection is 54 million, 3.4% of this is 1.8 million people. In 2018 there were just over 600,000 deaths registered in the uk. So corona could be responsible for something like 3 years worth of deaths - but these will not be spread out over even one year, they are most likely to occur all bunched up within a single month. I hope that i am wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thought if we were going to talk about it, it would be sensible to just keep it to the one thread on here.... anyway ... moving on from the last thread, we know this morning that the governments worse case scenario is for 100,000 deaths...... when you put it like that... yes we should all keep calm, and it still hits home.... If this is the governments worst case scenario, it is an order of magnitude underestimate for deaths. Detected cases are rising exponentially. The only successes is slowing the spread have been countries that have essentially stopped all public events and put whole cities into quarantine. Government action in the uk is too little, too late. Worst case would be 80 to 90% of the population becoming infected. Global death rates are currently running at 3.4% of those contracting the disease. Uk population is approx 68 million, 80% infection is 54 million, 3.4% of this is 1.8 million people. In 2018 there were just over 600,000 deaths registered in the uk. So corona could be responsible for something like 3 years worth of deaths - but these will not be spread out over even one year, they are most likely to occur all bunched up within a single month. I hope that i am wrong." In whichever scenario you pick one other thing will happen. The death rate by non Covid 19 causes will drop. For example: someone with terminal cancer who has say 3 months to live picks up the virus and they die from it. Covid 19 deaths increase by one, 3 months later cancer deaths reduce by one. Seeing as this virus affects the elderly much more than the young then the overall death rate almost certainly won't increase by the number of Covid 19 deaths. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t think the a Government is doing enough to contain the spread of the virus. It seems that when a case is identified connected to a school or a GP surgery - they close the building down to be cleaned. Why not proactively makes sure that these places are proactively cleaned instead of reactively? Shopping trolley handles and public transport have to be prime candidates for proactive and regular cleaning surely? I heard that shopping trolleys are never cleaned - ever." Why can’t you clean it before you touch it, protect yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t think the a Government is doing enough to contain the spread of the virus. It seems that when a case is identified connected to a school or a GP surgery - they close the building down to be cleaned. Why not proactively makes sure that these places are proactively cleaned instead of reactively? Shopping trolley handles and public transport have to be prime candidates for proactive and regular cleaning surely? I heard that shopping trolleys are never cleaned - ever." good point I actually have the shits right now, maybe caught from one of those trolleys yesterday so glad I bought all those loo rolls | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t think the a Government is doing enough to contain the spread of the virus. It seems that when a case is identified connected to a school or a GP surgery - they close the building down to be cleaned. Why not proactively makes sure that these places are proactively cleaned instead of reactively? Shopping trolley handles and public transport have to be prime candidates for proactive and regular cleaning surely? I heard that shopping trolleys are never cleaned - ever. Why can’t you clean it before you touch it, protect yourself." What with? Remember we are talking an anti-viral cleanse... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Again I ask where you get the 80% infection rate. Considering the epicentre of this has approximately 81000 cases in a population of approximately 59 million. Now I don’t consider myself a mathematician but that’s nowhere near 80%." China is doing very well at slowing the progress through their country because they have a very authorative government, and population that by and large obey their government decrees. China has stopped all public gatherings in the infected areas and applied strict quarantine of cities. I suspect that they have also stopped counting cases in the worst affected areas. They also have the advantage of being a very large country, major cities are a long way apart, and there are big areas where the people are relatively poor and there is not huge amounts of travel. The very fact that the number of cases in the infected areas are doubling every two days means that this virus is incredibly contagious. It is the WHO that are reckoning that about 80% of people exposed to it are catching it. Which means that once it gets loose in the general population, there can be no stopping it. Count how many people you interact with on a daily basis, how often you touch some object that somebody else might have touched during the previous few hours. And how many people those people interact with. Etc. And remember, this virus is exceptional in that carriers can become infectious before they themselves show any symptoms. If EVERYBODY self isolated for a few weeks, it would slow down the spread. But this is impossible in our modern society. I don't have any solutions. I hope that I'm talking a load of crap. Keep safe out there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah but will be mainly elderly people who have had a full life" Most of them will have voted for Brexit and or be Tories. It’s called irony, sarcasm, humour, tongue in cheek. I know you'll understand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t think the a Government is doing enough to contain the spread of the virus. It seems that when a case is identified connected to a school or a GP surgery - they close the building down to be cleaned. Why not proactively makes sure that these places are proactively cleaned instead of reactively? Shopping trolley handles and public transport have to be prime candidates for proactive and regular cleaning surely? I heard that shopping trolleys are never cleaned - ever." The Government in this country can't really do shit. They'll tell you they can - but they can't. Why? There's too many of us and not enough police/forces personnel to make sure we're doing as we've been told. Factor in the usual level of selfishness and stupidity inherent in the general public - and the scale of the problem - in a democracy where people are used to doing exactly as they like, travelling wherever they want ... this can't be contained. It'll run its course, plenty of us will get infected and some will die. That's unfortunate but it's not uncommon. It never has been. Covid 19 will just become another thing humanity has to get used to. The common cold and usual influenza haven't been eradicated; nor will this virus. Eventually, when the economy has been fucked over enough - which is good for the planet - people will start to live with it, accept it and go back to work. They'll have to; those bills aren't going to pay themselves. In a capitalist system like ours - which does provide all manner of comforts, conveniences and luxuries - human life is worth less than money; which is why it will always be risked in the pursuit of wealth. Most people scared shitless of the virus just now will, given time, resume their normal pattern of behaviour. They'll risk it - because being trapped in your own home, washing your hands, running out of money and praying ASDA can deliver your shopping, is no life at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thought if we were going to talk about it, it would be sensible to just keep it to the one thread on here.... anyway ... moving on from the last thread, we know this morning that the governments worse case scenario is for 100,000 deaths...... when you put it like that... yes we should all keep calm, and it still hits home...." Well, on 25th Feb their reasonable worst case scenario was 500,000 deaths, so they must be doing something right...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One thing wrong with the ‘man-made’ theory is the virus’ lack of exclusivity. Why release a novel virus with no means to control its spread and effect?I think cos something went wrong in the lab or they underestimated its side effects as it cant be stopped, there are roumors that bill gates could be involved as well." Is this a wind up or do you genuinely think like this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I assumed that the talk on social media about panic buying was a bit of a joke. Then, this afternoon - I went to Asda. What a joke. Empty shelves where the loo rolls are normally, empty shelves where pasta is kept. Multi-packs of beans, soups and the like / completely sold out. There was a woman with two trolleys literally piled high with tinned food. I asked her if she was going away in her caravan lol" pmsl what did she say ? Loo roll and beans there’s a combo she will block her drains lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One thing wrong with the ‘man-made’ theory is the virus’ lack of exclusivity. Why release a novel virus with no means to control its spread and effect?I think cos something went wrong in the lab or they underestimated its side effects as it cant be stopped, there are roumors that bill gates could be involved as well. Is this a wind up or do you genuinely think like this " is this your first time in the politics forum? if yes you will hear alsorts of crazy stuff lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One thing wrong with the ‘man-made’ theory is the virus’ lack of exclusivity. Why release a novel virus with no means to control its spread and effect?I think cos something went wrong in the lab or they underestimated its side effects as it cant be stopped, there are roumors that bill gates could be involved as well. Is this a wind up or do you genuinely think like this is this your first time in the politics forum? if yes you will hear alsorts of crazy stuff lol" Yeah my sisters boyfriends mothers brother was talking to someone down the pub who knew a extinction rebellion supporter who said they invented it to stop travel and save the world. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"One thing wrong with the ‘man-made’ theory is the virus’ lack of exclusivity. Why release a novel virus with no means to control its spread and effect?I think cos something went wrong in the lab or they underestimated its side effects as it cant be stopped, there are roumors that bill gates could be involved as well. Is this a wind up or do you genuinely think like this is this your first time in the politics forum? if yes you will hear alsorts of crazy stuff lolYeah my sisters boyfriends mothers brother was talking to someone down the pub who knew a extinction rebellion supporter who said they invented it to stop travel and save the world. " That'll be the same guy who told the pub that Brexit was a good idea. He spoke about getting rid of job stealing foreigners, controlling our borders, keeping our fish, unicorns and paradise. Scary thing is, the idiots in the pub believed him! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I assumed that the talk on social media about panic buying was a bit of a joke. Then, this afternoon - I went to Asda. What a joke. Empty shelves where the loo rolls are normally, empty shelves where pasta is kept. Multi-packs of beans, soups and the like / completely sold out. There was a woman with two trolleys literally piled high with tinned food. I asked her if she was going away in her caravan lol pmsl what did she say ? Loo roll and beans there’s a combo she will block her drains lol" ******************** | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Based on Italy's latest statistics, the fatality rate is at about 6.25%. worst case scenario for the UK was put at 80% infected, I make that a possible death toll of around 3.3 million. " We aren't Italy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Based on Italy's latest statistics, the fatality rate is at about 6.25%. worst case scenario for the UK was put at 80% infected, I make that a possible death toll of around 3.3 million. We aren't Italy. " Oh, that's alright then, so the virus has different fatality rates for us does it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Bloody hell, some of the nonsense I read on here is ridiculous. Natural selection really should have picked some people off by now. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Based on Italy's latest statistics, the fatality rate is at about 6.25%. worst case scenario for the UK was put at 80% infected, I make that a possible death toll of around 3.3 million. We aren't Italy. Oh, that's alright then, so the virus has different fatality rates for us does it? " the health service in italy isnt as joined up as here.the nhs is under a national umbrella the health service in italy is run by each province so some may be coping better than others.think there at least 10 or 12 different areas in italy and all run by different arms of goverment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Based on Italy's latest statistics, the fatality rate is at about 6.25%. worst case scenario for the UK was put at 80% infected, I make that a possible death toll of around 3.3 million. We aren't Italy. Oh, that's alright then, so the virus has different fatality rates for us does it? " You do realise the fatality rate does vary from area to area, country to country etc? It's dependant on many things, average age and health status of the population, the healthcare available, the quality of the healthcare available, the population density. It isn't just a flat rate for every country | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Based on Italy's latest statistics, the fatality rate is at about 6.25%. worst case scenario for the UK was put at 80% infected, I make that a possible death toll of around 3.3 million. We aren't Italy. Oh, that's alright then, so the virus has different fatality rates for us does it? You do realise the fatality rate does vary from area to area, country to country etc? It's dependant on many things, average age and health status of the population, the healthcare available, the quality of the healthcare available, the population density. It isn't just a flat rate for every country " Except it seemingly mainly kills old/er people. Children are not/rarely affected and adults may be asymptomatic. Strange, for a novel virus strain. Remind me, how old is Mr Trump? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Based on Italy's latest statistics, the fatality rate is at about 6.25%. worst case scenario for the UK was put at 80% infected, I make that a possible death toll of around 3.3 million. We aren't Italy. Oh, that's alright then, so the virus has different fatality rates for us does it? the health service in italy isnt as joined up as here.the nhs is under a national umbrella the health service in italy is run by each province so some may be coping better than others.think there at least 10 or 12 different areas in italy and all run by different arms of goverment" Italy has a lot more older people in the community | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Based on Italy's latest statistics, the fatality rate is at about 6.25%. worst case scenario for the UK was put at 80% infected, I make that a possible death toll of around 3.3 million. We aren't Italy. Oh, that's alright then, so the virus has different fatality rates for us does it? You do realise the fatality rate does vary from area to area, country to country etc? It's dependant on many things, average age and health status of the population, the healthcare available, the quality of the healthcare available, the population density. It isn't just a flat rate for every country Except it seemingly mainly kills old/er people. Children are not/rarely affected and adults may be asymptomatic. Strange, for a novel virus strain. Remind me, how old is Mr Trump?" Why is it strange? There is a huge variety in how different viruses affect different demographics, why should this one be any different? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish" 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? " I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish" And all it took was a draconian 2 month shut down of the entire region. You do realise that 80000 figure would likely be in the millions otherwise I assume | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. " I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service " I'm completely aware it will spread but what exactly are you expecting me to do about it? I can't stop it, I can't prevent the strain on the nhs so spreading 'worse case scenarios' and other stories doesn't change anything. I'm doing what I can do to protect the people around me, that's all anyone can do. Oh and your little smarmy comment about how smart I think I am, after reading some of the responses on here, I'm far more informed and acting in a responsible manner than at least 50% of the posters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. " "Plan for the worst, hope for the best" Mart keeps drumming this into me about everything, and, as much as I hate to admit it, he's right. So, you buy a few extra items in your shopping... "just in case." You talk to family about "what if...", and make plans..."just in case". Is that really so bad? You insure your house, car, pets, even your health or life, why?..."just in case". This is a quote from someone about their experience in Italy under the lockdown.... "At the beginning of this, we didn’t take it seriously. Then we complained that the media was overdoing it and creating hysteria (and they were, in many ways). Then we vowed to not be affected by it, that the economy needed to come first and we needed to keep living our normal lives. I was doing all of the above until this past weekend. That’s when it became clear that this thing spreads super easily, and kills more than we thought. 460 people dead in a few days. And no, it’s not only old people. There’s some people in their 40s and 50s too. But most importantly, since when a grandparent is worth less than us? That narrative is horrible and needs to stop. The big problem is that the virus spreads fast, and that means that even if few require hospitalization, if too many catch it, hospitals get overwhelmed. People show up in hospitals unable to breathe and need respirators, which are numbered. Each person requires that respirator for at least 6/8 days, (our patient 1 was on it for 3 weeks), which means that people who come after can’t be treated. We have one of the best public healthcare systems in the world, and the epicenter of the epidemic is Milan, one of the richest regions in the developed world, with some of the best hospitals in Europe, and yet they are completely overwhelmed. Today they announced that they will need to choose who to treat and who they will let die. It’s like a war. I’m so sad for Italy. We don’t deserve this. Our economy will be hit hard, but the government has had the courage to take dramatic, if very unpopular steps. Yet I see so much inaction globally, so many European neighbors not doing very much, and the US seems completely unprepared for this. Yet this thing is coming and will be much worse everywhere soon." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service I'm completely aware it will spread but what exactly are you expecting me to do about it? I can't stop it, I can't prevent the strain on the nhs so spreading 'worse case scenarios' and other stories doesn't change anything. I'm doing what I can do to protect the people around me, that's all anyone can do. Oh and your little smarmy comment about how smart I think I am, after reading some of the responses on here, I'm far more informed and acting in a responsible manner than at least 50% of the posters. " It's not a smarmy comment when it's true though is it, as you've gone on to confirm in the same sentence. You unfortunately suffer from the Dunning Kruger effect in this particular instance, basing your actions on the current numbers is wrong, as we're already into the thousands as the next week will bear out. In terms of what should you do? Be sensible and treat it like the potentially major issue it is. If you fall ill, take all reasonable actions not to spread whatever you have. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service I'm completely aware it will spread but what exactly are you expecting me to do about it? I can't stop it, I can't prevent the strain on the nhs so spreading 'worse case scenarios' and other stories doesn't change anything. I'm doing what I can do to protect the people around me, that's all anyone can do. Oh and your little smarmy comment about how smart I think I am, after reading some of the responses on here, I'm far more informed and acting in a responsible manner than at least 50% of the posters. It's not a smarmy comment when it's true though is it, as you've gone on to confirm in the same sentence. You unfortunately suffer from the Dunning Kruger effect in this particular instance, basing your actions on the current numbers is wrong, as we're already into the thousands as the next week will bear out. In terms of what should you do? Be sensible and treat it like the potentially major issue it is. If you fall ill, take all reasonable actions not to spread whatever you have. " If you look at many of my other posts on this subject that's exactly what I've been saying. I will not give into pressure and panic caused by the media. The selfish twats panic buying are causing more issues for vulnerable people than corona is. That's what panic and believing everything you read in the media does. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service I'm completely aware it will spread but what exactly are you expecting me to do about it? I can't stop it, I can't prevent the strain on the nhs so spreading 'worse case scenarios' and other stories doesn't change anything. I'm doing what I can do to protect the people around me, that's all anyone can do. Oh and your little smarmy comment about how smart I think I am, after reading some of the responses on here, I'm far more informed and acting in a responsible manner than at least 50% of the posters. It's not a smarmy comment when it's true though is it, as you've gone on to confirm in the same sentence. You unfortunately suffer from the Dunning Kruger effect in this particular instance, basing your actions on the current numbers is wrong, as we're already into the thousands as the next week will bear out. In terms of what should you do? Be sensible and treat it like the potentially major issue it is. If you fall ill, take all reasonable actions not to spread whatever you have. If you look at many of my other posts on this subject that's exactly what I've been saying. I will not give into pressure and panic caused by the media. The selfish twats panic buying are causing more issues for vulnerable people than corona is. That's what panic and believing everything you read in the media does. " Well we certainly agree on that, as serious as this is, it's not going to be the end of days and there's no real reason that basic supplies will completely dry up, but there are indeed twats out there currently sandwiched between a mountain of bog roll and pasta | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service I'm completely aware it will spread but what exactly are you expecting me to do about it? I can't stop it, I can't prevent the strain on the nhs so spreading 'worse case scenarios' and other stories doesn't change anything. I'm doing what I can do to protect the people around me, that's all anyone can do. Oh and your little smarmy comment about how smart I think I am, after reading some of the responses on here, I'm far more informed and acting in a responsible manner than at least 50% of the posters. It's not a smarmy comment when it's true though is it, as you've gone on to confirm in the same sentence. You unfortunately suffer from the Dunning Kruger effect in this particular instance, basing your actions on the current numbers is wrong, as we're already into the thousands as the next week will bear out. In terms of what should you do? Be sensible and treat it like the potentially major issue it is. If you fall ill, take all reasonable actions not to spread whatever you have. " The Dunning Kruger comment, when you're a Doctor in psychology, come back and diagnose me. I'm not the one ignoring current facts and figures published by experts and letting my mind run away with worse case scenarios that are not fact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service I'm completely aware it will spread but what exactly are you expecting me to do about it? I can't stop it, I can't prevent the strain on the nhs so spreading 'worse case scenarios' and other stories doesn't change anything. I'm doing what I can do to protect the people around me, that's all anyone can do. Oh and your little smarmy comment about how smart I think I am, after reading some of the responses on here, I'm far more informed and acting in a responsible manner than at least 50% of the posters. It's not a smarmy comment when it's true though is it, as you've gone on to confirm in the same sentence. You unfortunately suffer from the Dunning Kruger effect in this particular instance, basing your actions on the current numbers is wrong, as we're already into the thousands as the next week will bear out. In terms of what should you do? Be sensible and treat it like the potentially major issue it is. If you fall ill, take all reasonable actions not to spread whatever you have. The Dunning Kruger comment, when you're a Doctor in psychology, come back and diagnose me. I'm not the one ignoring current facts and figures published by experts and letting my mind run away with worse case scenarios that are not fact. " It's not a requirement to be a Dr in a subject to know what it is. Try listening to what the experts are actually saying, the facts and figures represent the situation up to two weeks ago. Diagnosis are doubling every 4-6 days, this disease is exceedingly contagious, hence why the experts are deeply concerned | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hubei province infected 80000 ish Hubei province population 59 million ish Hubei province deaths 3000 ish 3.75% fatality rate...in the UK, based on govts "worst case scenario"... thats still 2,475,000 deaths...why are people not getting it? This virus is a known killer, but social media idiots are still going on about it being "only flu"..."only flu" doesnt shut down your organs, give you sepsis, and then kill you. I'm not chicken Licken... giving it the "sky is falling in!", but people need to take this seriously. A quote from an American rescue worker.... "There are 2 types of people in the world, the first evacuates the area when the authorities say a storm is coming, or has made plans and is safe, warm, fed and sheltered. The second decides to stay put, makes no plans, and thinks "It's ok, it aint gonna be that bad"...these are the ones who die, or get rescued off the roofs of their houses in the flood, or wander round hungry and thirsty when their house gets blown away...and moan because people aren't there, putting their lives at risk, to give them food and water". I'm the first guy...which one are you? I'm the one that isn't basing my life around a worse case scenario, I'm basing it around the current facts and figures. I'm sure someone as smart as you believe yourself to be understands the concept of exponential growth, which means if you're concerning yourself about the current situation, you're already about 2 or 3 weeks behind. This time next week case's will be over 1000 almost certainly, and then if there's no significant intervention cases will be in the 10s of thousands within a month, along with the crippling impacts mass hospitalizations will have on an already creaking health service I'm completely aware it will spread but what exactly are you expecting me to do about it? I can't stop it, I can't prevent the strain on the nhs so spreading 'worse case scenarios' and other stories doesn't change anything. I'm doing what I can do to protect the people around me, that's all anyone can do. Oh and your little smarmy comment about how smart I think I am, after reading some of the responses on here, I'm far more informed and acting in a responsible manner than at least 50% of the posters. It's not a smarmy comment when it's true though is it, as you've gone on to confirm in the same sentence. You unfortunately suffer from the Dunning Kruger effect in this particular instance, basing your actions on the current numbers is wrong, as we're already into the thousands as the next week will bear out. In terms of what should you do? Be sensible and treat it like the potentially major issue it is. If you fall ill, take all reasonable actions not to spread whatever you have. The Dunning Kruger comment, when you're a Doctor in psychology, come back and diagnose me. I'm not the one ignoring current facts and figures published by experts and letting my mind run away with worse case scenarios that are not fact. It's not a requirement to be a Dr in a subject to know what it is. Try listening to what the experts are actually saying, the facts and figures represent the situation up to two weeks ago. Diagnosis are doubling every 4-6 days, this disease is exceedingly contagious, hence why the experts are deeply concerned " The facts and figures I've been looking at are from the day I'm looking at them. The deputy chief medical officer today stated that while many thousands of people will catch it, a very small percentage will die or need critical care. It's natural to be concerned but not to the point where people are acting irrationally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh also, I only accept diagnoses from doctors." Then I'm sure you'll know that Psychologists aren't medical doctors and therefore unable to provide clinical diagnosis I'm afraid | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. " Normal flu is around 0.1% | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh also, I only accept diagnoses from doctors. Then I'm sure you'll know that Psychologists aren't medical doctors and therefore unable to provide clinical diagnosis I'm afraid " That's why I said I only accept diagnoses from doctors, not a random guy on the fab forums. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh also, I only accept diagnoses from doctors. Then I'm sure you'll know that Psychologists aren't medical doctors and therefore unable to provide clinical diagnosis I'm afraid That's why I said I only accept diagnoses from doctors, not a random guy on the fab forums." My god all this flirting is arousing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. " Again, we are not in Italy. They have totally different circumstances than we do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And how many more never got reported due to them thinking it was a flu. This is the Uk. 90% of us don’t go to the doctors, unless we’re dying! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And how many more never got reported due to them thinking it was a flu. This is the Uk. 90% of us don’t go to the doctors, unless we’re dying! " Or we want a sick note.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1%" Spanish flu was 2-3%... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%..." That’s a made up number, it’s been agreed no one has clue what the real death toll was. News blackouts world wide and Alfonso made sure no one knew the real numbers from Spain. The % range was from 2-3% all the way upto 10-12% | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%..." Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then..." Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more " I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's coming folks, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. You can go into denial, castigate those who give realistic figures of infection, or claim that the UK isn't like 'other counties', but it won't make a blind bit of difference, because it's coming soon to a person near you. Most of you will recover, about 97% probably, but many of us won't, and we include your parents or siblings. From my age and medical history, I'm unlikely to see the summer. Hope it's a nice one for you all." We know it's coming, we know it will infect a high number of people and we also know that, unfortunately, people will die. But other than follow the guidance set out for us by experts, there's not a damn thing we can do about it. What's the point spending your time stressing over something you cannot control? All you can do is take rational steps to keep yourself and everyone around you as safe as you can. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well my mum's, aunty's, dad's mate John said that is was developed in a lab by a faction of the remainers and extinction rebellion and apparently it only targets Brexit voters. " Every grey cloud has a silver lining. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's coming folks, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. You can go into denial, castigate those who give realistic figures of infection, or claim that the UK isn't like 'other counties', but it won't make a blind bit of difference, because it's coming soon to a person near you. Most of you will recover, about 97% probably, but many of us won't, and we include your parents or siblings. From my age and medical history, I'm unlikely to see the summer. Hope it's a nice one for you all. We know it's coming, we know it will infect a high number of people and we also know that, unfortunately, people will die. But other than follow the guidance set out for us by experts, there's not a damn thing we can do about it. What's the point spending your time stressing over something you cannot control? All you can do is take rational steps to keep yourself and everyone around you as safe as you can. " Unfortunately there are an awful lot of people who are failing to grasp the severity of the situation, many of them on these forums apparently, and they are the ones that I'm addressing. I'm pleased that you seem to be acknowledging that it's going to get far worse before it begins to get better. Oh and I'm not stressing, and I am taking steps, but that may well be in vain if idiots don't start taking this threat seriously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now!" You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's coming folks, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. You can go into denial, castigate those who give realistic figures of infection, or claim that the UK isn't like 'other counties', but it won't make a blind bit of difference, because it's coming soon to a person near you. Most of you will recover, about 97% probably, but many of us won't, and we include your parents or siblings. From my age and medical history, I'm unlikely to see the summer. Hope it's a nice one for you all. We know it's coming, we know it will infect a high number of people and we also know that, unfortunately, people will die. But other than follow the guidance set out for us by experts, there's not a damn thing we can do about it. What's the point spending your time stressing over something you cannot control? All you can do is take rational steps to keep yourself and everyone around you as safe as you can. Unfortunately there are an awful lot of people who are failing to grasp the severity of the situation, many of them on these forums apparently, and they are the ones that I'm addressing. I'm pleased that you seem to be acknowledging that it's going to get far worse before it begins to get better. Oh and I'm not stressing, and I am taking steps, but that may well be in vain if idiots don't start taking this threat seriously." I don't think people aren't taking it seriously, they just aren't panicking. The amount of false doom and gloom 'facts' people have spouted on the forums are making things far worse and causing alot of the irrational panic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia " Viral pneumonia can lead to bacterial pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia Viral pneumonia can lead to bacterial pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics." It can indeed. Still the general point is that this disease can't be treated in any meaningful way through anti biotics | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia Viral pneumonia can lead to bacterial pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics. It can indeed. Still the general point is that this disease can't be treated in any meaningful way through anti biotics" We knew that anyway. However, it's often the combination of corona and other health issues that are fatal, not the virus on its own. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's coming folks, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. You can go into denial, castigate those who give realistic figures of infection, or claim that the UK isn't like 'other counties', but it won't make a blind bit of difference, because it's coming soon to a person near you. Most of you will recover, about 97% probably, but many of us won't, and we include your parents or siblings. From my age and medical history, I'm unlikely to see the summer. Hope it's a nice one for you all. We know it's coming, we know it will infect a high number of people and we also know that, unfortunately, people will die. But other than follow the guidance set out for us by experts, there's not a damn thing we can do about it. What's the point spending your time stressing over something you cannot control? All you can do is take rational steps to keep yourself and everyone around you as safe as you can. Unfortunately there are an awful lot of people who are failing to grasp the severity of the situation, many of them on these forums apparently, and they are the ones that I'm addressing. I'm pleased that you seem to be acknowledging that it's going to get far worse before it begins to get better. Oh and I'm not stressing, and I am taking steps, but that may well be in vain if idiots don't start taking this threat seriously. I don't think people aren't taking it seriously, they just aren't panicking. The amount of false doom and gloom 'facts' people have spouted on the forums are making things far worse and causing alot of the irrational panic." I don't think posting things like " more people are dying on the roads" is taking it seriously really, and there are quite a few people who are being as irresponsible as this on here. If you extend this little bubble to the world at large, then that's an awful lot of people who won't believe it until they've caught it themselves. Nor do I think that any of the facts and figures I've posted on the forums are 'false'. If anything they are conservative, and that goes for a lot of other posters too. Still, you believe whatever suits you. Anyway, can't stand here chatting all day, I have to go and wash my hands again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's coming folks, and there's not a damn thing you can do about it. You can go into denial, castigate those who give realistic figures of infection, or claim that the UK isn't like 'other counties', but it won't make a blind bit of difference, because it's coming soon to a person near you. Most of you will recover, about 97% probably, but many of us won't, and we include your parents or siblings. From my age and medical history, I'm unlikely to see the summer. Hope it's a nice one for you all. We know it's coming, we know it will infect a high number of people and we also know that, unfortunately, people will die. But other than follow the guidance set out for us by experts, there's not a damn thing we can do about it. What's the point spending your time stressing over something you cannot control? All you can do is take rational steps to keep yourself and everyone around you as safe as you can. Unfortunately there are an awful lot of people who are failing to grasp the severity of the situation, many of them on these forums apparently, and they are the ones that I'm addressing. I'm pleased that you seem to be acknowledging that it's going to get far worse before it begins to get better. Oh and I'm not stressing, and I am taking steps, but that may well be in vain if idiots don't start taking this threat seriously. I don't think people aren't taking it seriously, they just aren't panicking. The amount of false doom and gloom 'facts' people have spouted on the forums are making things far worse and causing alot of the irrational panic. I don't think posting things like " more people are dying on the roads" is taking it seriously really, and there are quite a few people who are being as irresponsible as this on here. If you extend this little bubble to the world at large, then that's an awful lot of people who won't believe it until they've caught it themselves. Nor do I think that any of the facts and figures I've posted on the forums are 'false'. If anything they are conservative, and that goes for a lot of other posters too. Still, you believe whatever suits you. Anyway, can't stand here chatting all day, I have to go and wash my hands again. " I wasn't talking about you posting false 'facts', I was just saying in general there are alot of inaccurate statements being throw around. I don't think stating facts about other causes of death isn't taking it seriously at all, I think people are trying to show some perspective. Yes, coronavirus can cause death, yes, it is causing stress and worry, yes, it is affecting the economy, but all we can do is follow the advice we are given. That is what I'm trying to encourage people to do, not to panic and believe everything that they see online, but to follow the guidelines published by the people who know what they are talking about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia Viral pneumonia can lead to bacterial pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics. It can indeed. Still the general point is that this disease can't be treated in any meaningful way through anti biotics" Mate you are spouting a load of shite. I was referring to the amount of deaths to the Spanish flu not this virus, and how the lack of antibiotics will have impacted on the death toll then! As for the viral and Bacterial pneumonia...I was in icy for a week with both back in 2008, so I know what I'm talking about. And it's already has been said one leads to another. Maybe you need to read up on the posts your replying to eh! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There are reports saying that the covid-19 corona virus was created in a wuhan laboratory, it wouldnt surprise me if it was man made." This. reminds me of “ planet of the apes “ movie. Experimenting under pressure to produce a miracle drug, look how that ended. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia Viral pneumonia can lead to bacterial pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics. It can indeed. Still the general point is that this disease can't be treated in any meaningful way through anti biotics Mate you are spouting a load of shite. I was referring to the amount of deaths to the Spanish flu not this virus, and how the lack of antibiotics will have impacted on the death toll then! As for the viral and Bacterial pneumonia...I was in icy for a week with both back in 2008, so I know what I'm talking about. And it's already has been said one leads to another. Maybe you need to read up on the posts your replying to eh!" You realise the Spanish flu was a virus right? Antibiotics wouldn't have helped in anyway other than helping secondary bacterial infections, basically it would have been minimal. I'd expect someone who'd had both forms of pneumonia to know that ABs aren't really a suitable treatment for viral infections | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia Viral pneumonia can lead to bacterial pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics. It can indeed. Still the general point is that this disease can't be treated in any meaningful way through anti biotics Mate you are spouting a load of shite. I was referring to the amount of deaths to the Spanish flu not this virus, and how the lack of antibiotics will have impacted on the death toll then! As for the viral and Bacterial pneumonia...I was in icy for a week with both back in 2008, so I know what I'm talking about. And it's already has been said one leads to another. Maybe you need to read up on the posts your replying to eh! You realise the Spanish flu was a virus right? Antibiotics wouldn't have helped in anyway other than helping secondary bacterial infections, basically it would have been minimal. I'd expect someone who'd had both forms of pneumonia to know that ABs aren't really a suitable treatment for viral infections" Your not getting it are you...so I'll waste no more time with you... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Mate you are spouting a load of shite. I was referring to the amount of deaths to the Spanish flu not this virus, and how the lack of antibiotics will have impacted on the death toll then! As for the viral and Bacterial pneumonia...I was in icy for a week with both back in 2008, so I know what I'm talking about. And it's already has been said one leads to another. Maybe you need to read up on the posts your replying to eh!" You are spot on that Viral pneumonia can lead onto bacterial and the reason is due to the amount of bacterium humans carry in their nose, mouth and throats and this easily spreads when immune system lowered so many on here think antibiotics are of no use, that is good for us who are prescribed and take them, and bad for them who continue to think they are on no use I am taking a 3 monthly dose of daily anti biotics right now, and if any sign of any type of chest infection I will be straight onto high strength anti biotics which I keep on stand by I have no spleen which means I have the possibility of a lower immune system and anti biotics are advised by all doctors in UK as well as surgeons for those on here that spout, anti biotics do no good on here, thats good, you believe that as for me, I will take advice from doctors and surgeons | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Emergency legislation to be brought in next week. Maybe to ban sporting events etc. " i don't they will go as far as banning sporting events... but they may limit "public gatherings" to the point where they either play everything "behind closed doors" or just cancel for the sake of it... its beginning to happen in the states where it will be a state by state decision... but there will be NBA and NHL games behind closed doors as of tonight... also the huge annual national college basketball tourney starts next week and already 2 of the 8 first and second round site are going to play games behind closed doors... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Emergency legislation to be brought in next week. Maybe to ban sporting events etc. " Cancel the Premier League this season, just to piss of the scoucers Even better, settle the league table alphabetically | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Emergency legislation to be brought in next week. Maybe to ban sporting events etc. Cancel the Premier League this season, just to piss of the scoucers Even better, settle the league table alphabetically " Scousers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Teachers at a private school are drawing up plans to not return to School after the Easter Break and teach from home through to Summer. " my old university in the states, michigan state, and a load of other unis are going to "online classes only" as of monday.... and on cue the entire ncaa mens and womens college basketball tournaments are going to be played behind closed doors.... and the mens/womens college ice hockey tournaments as well... for the states this is huge! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Teachers at a private school are drawing up plans to not return to School after the Easter Break and teach from home through to Summer. my old university in the states, michigan state, and a load of other unis are going to "online classes only" as of monday.... and on cue the entire ncaa mens and womens college basketball tournaments are going to be played behind closed doors.... and the mens/womens college ice hockey tournaments as well... for the states this is huge! " Sensible precautions in my opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumonia. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia Viral pneumonia can lead to bacterial pneumonia which can be treated with antibiotics. It can indeed. Still the general point is that this disease can't be treated in any meaningful way through anti biotics Mate you are spouting a load of shite. I was referring to the amount of deaths to the Spanish flu not this virus, and how the lack of antibiotics will have impacted on the death toll then! As for the viral and Bacterial pneumonia...I was in icy for a week with both back in 2008, so I know what I'm talking about. And it's already has been said one leads to another. Maybe you need to read up on the posts your replying to eh! You realise the Spanish flu was a virus right? Antibiotics wouldn't have helped in anyway other than helping secondary bacterial infections, basically it would have been minimal. I'd expect someone who'd had both forms of pneumonia to know that ABs aren't really a suitable treatment for viral infections Your not getting it are you...so I'll waste no more time with you..." I get that you're assertion that Spanish flu mortality rate could have been assisted by antibiotics is bollocks. If it was that straightforward we wouldn't be in as much of a pickle now (barring super bacteria of course) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumoniae. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia " You're correct except that often what kills the person off is not the original viral infection but a secondary, opportunist bacterial infection. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Teachers at a private school are drawing up plans to not return to School after the Easter Break and teach from home through to Summer. my old university in the states, michigan state, and a load of other unis are going to "online classes only" as of monday.... and on cue the entire ncaa mens and womens college basketball tournaments are going to be played behind closed doors.... and the mens/womens college ice hockey tournaments as well... for the states this is huge! Sensible precautions in my opinion. " Not if the events are still being televised. People getting together in a confined space to watch these events on TV could be just as much of a spread risk as people gathering to watch the event live. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""...reported a total of 463 virus-related deaths and more than 9,000 confirmed cases in just over two weeks." A 5.14% mortality rate...normal flu is around 1%. Normal flu is around 0.1% Spanish flu was 2-3%... Maybe that was more down to the fact that antibiotics were not around then... Given that antibiotics have don't work against viral infections, I suggest you read up a bit more I think you will find that flu can infect the respiratory system and the majority of those who died back then it will have been due to it turning to pneumonia. Having had pneumonia twice in my life....the most recent only a month ago..I have no doubt that without antibiotics I would be dead now! You had bacterial pneumoniae. I'll say it again, antibiotics won't help viral pneumonia You're correct except that often what kills the person off is not the original viral infection but a secondary, opportunist bacterial infection. " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? " Demographic isn't representative of global population | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whatever the measures, it will be proportional and evidence led. We will just have to accept it, and hopefully better times will not be too far away. I saw that Angela Merkel was warning Germany, that upto 70% may be affected. That would have drastic consequences for their already stagnant economy. " She said 70-80% of people will get it eventually.... not at the same time! Our chief medical officer has said the same thing... for most that will be a mild flu at best, the hope is the hospitalisation rate drops so hopefully the nhs can cope.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? " That's not accurate for the entire world though. Do you understand how global statistics work? They are for the whole world, not just Italy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? " What was the ages of the dead? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? " Not only that but every death where someone has tested positive for corona is being counted as a death caused by corona, often they were being treated for other illnesses before that and they may have died from something else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. " Someone shoulld tell him it'ss too late it's already there. Oh wait they probably have | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? " It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. " Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. " Everyone can get it, but for some strange reason kids do not seem to have any symptoms and do not get I'll. But they still carry and spread it. It's a bugger of a bug... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. " Show me the report | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. Everyone can get it, but for some strange reason kids do not seem to have any symptoms and do not get I'll. But they still carry and spread it. It's a bugger of a bug..." Same with seasonal flu, their immune system suppresses the symptoms or the symptoms are much reduced or shortened | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. Show me the report" I think you will find that italy is very family orientated, whereby the young visit there great grandparents regularly. But with the youngest not showing symptoms of this...it just went bang and hence the massive spread in Italy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The real question is how many tens of thousands or more got it, recovered and didn't get tested. Yes it's serious, yes take precautions but the same should be the case ALL THE TIME " Hey I had pneumonia last month and back then....yes just 4 weeks ago they were not testing for it unless you had recent contact with people from or had been to china. I kinda hope I had it and got over it...but I dont know.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. " Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications." Not really, just screen passports, your coming in from a EU country, fuck off, go back | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications." Just watching something about this on tv now apparently all that stopping people entering a country does is push the peak of infection further down the road self protection still seems the best way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications. Not really, just screen passports, your coming in from a EU country, fuck off, go back " It would have immense implications especially with the Easter holidays on the horizon. Nothing in also (by default) means nothing out. So that would be the end of stag and hen do's in Benidorm. Swinger holidays in Gran Canary, and pretty much every family holiday to any country in the Schengen area. Jeez! If it carried on it could even fuck Cap d'Agde in the summer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications. Not really, just screen passports, your coming in from a EU country, fuck off, go back It would have immense implications especially with the Easter holidays on the horizon. Nothing in also (by default) means nothing out. So that would be the end of stag and hen do's in Benidorm. Swinger holidays in Gran Canary, and pretty much every family holiday to any country in the Schengen area. Jeez! If it carried on it could even fuck Cap d'Agde in the summer. " I was just reading that it looks like semana santa parades will be cancelled in spain this easter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications. Not really, just screen passports, your coming in from a EU country, fuck off, go back It would have immense implications especially with the Easter holidays on the horizon. Nothing in also (by default) means nothing out. So that would be the end of stag and hen do's in Benidorm. Swinger holidays in Gran Canary, and pretty much every family holiday to any country in the Schengen area. Jeez! If it carried on it could even fuck Cap d'Agde in the summer. I was just reading that it looks like semana santa parades will be cancelled in spain this easter. " Yes I've read the same. We are in Spain now and not due to fly back until a week on Monday. Anything could happen between now and then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications. Not really, just screen passports, your coming in from a EU country, fuck off, go back It would have immense implications especially with the Easter holidays on the horizon. Nothing in also (by default) means nothing out. So that would be the end of stag and hen do's in Benidorm. Swinger holidays in Gran Canary, and pretty much every family holiday to any country in the Schengen area. Jeez! If it carried on it could even fuck Cap d'Agde in the summer. " thats just what they all deserve for traveling east go west, fly usa | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No travel from EU Schengen area to the USA for 30 days. That's going to have some implications. Apparently pressure is being put on Boris to do the same. Now that would REALLy have implications. Not really, just screen passports, your coming in from a EU country, fuck off, go back It would have immense implications especially with the Easter holidays on the horizon. Nothing in also (by default) means nothing out. So that would be the end of stag and hen do's in Benidorm. Swinger holidays in Gran Canary, and pretty much every family holiday to any country in the Schengen area. Jeez! If it carried on it could even fuck Cap d'Agde in the summer. I was just reading that it looks like semana santa parades will be cancelled in spain this easter. Yes I've read the same. We are in Spain now and not due to fly back until a week on Monday. Anything could happen between now and then. " I was coming back for a week or two next week but put it on hold now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. " https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/covid-19-coronavirus-infographic-datapack/ Very, very few younger people are getting it. That’s the best data pack anywhere you can find! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Emergency legislation to be brought in next week. Maybe to ban sporting events etc. i don't they will go as far as banning sporting events... but they may limit "public gatherings" to the point where they either play everything "behind closed doors" or just cancel for the sake of it... its beginning to happen in the states where it will be a state by state decision... but there will be NBA and NHL games behind closed doors as of tonight... also the huge annual national college basketball tourney starts next week and already 2 of the 8 first and second round site are going to play games behind closed doors..." Just announced they are suspending major league soccer too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. https://informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/covid-19-coronavirus-infographic-datapack/ Very, very few younger people are getting it. That’s the best data pack anywhere you can find! " I've seen it, but to say it's only targeting older people is false. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. Show me the report" Show me the report where it says it ONLY targets older people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just watched some dirty cunt poking through the bread rolls in lidl with his hands looking for the biggest one I called him out naturally and he wandered round lidl muttering to himself in what sounded like Eastern European language probably cursing me Fucking dirty scum ( Not because he's foreign lol)" Did you wear gloves when you went to Lidl? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. Show me the report Show me the report where it says it ONLY targets older people. " Quote "March 10, 2020 at 10:00 AM EDT One of the few mercies of the spreading coronavirus is that it leaves young children virtually untouched — a mystery virologists say may hold vital clues as to how the virus works. In China, only 2.4 percent of reported cases were children and only 0.2 percent of reported cases were children who got critically ill, according to the World Health Organization. China has reported no case of a young child dying of the disease covid-19. Meanwhile, the new coronavirus has proved especially deadly on the other end of the age spectrum. The fatality rate in China for those over 80 is an estimated 21.9 percent, per the WHO. For ages 10 to 39, however, the fatality rate is roughly 0.2 percent, according to a separate study drawing on patient records of 44,672 confirmed cases. And fatalities and severe symptoms are almost nonexistent at even younger ages. " End quote Please show me your references Of course it's an uncharted course but so far young children are relatively safe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just watched some dirty cunt poking through the bread rolls in lidl with his hands looking for the biggest one I called him out naturally and he wandered round lidl muttering to himself in what sounded like Eastern European language probably cursing me Fucking dirty scum ( Not because he's foreign lol) Did you wear gloves when you went to Lidl? " No but I used alcohol cleaner when I left and I didn't move all the unwrapped bread with my bare hands either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So, 12000 cases in Italy, and 800 deaths, fatality rate of 6.6%....but its only flu, right? What was the ages of the dead? It’s a virus that targets older people, not children or younger adults in general life. Strange. Younger people are getting it, it doesn't just target older people. Show me the report Show me the report where it says it ONLY targets older people. Quote "March 10, 2020 at 10:00 AM EDT One of the few mercies of the spreading coronavirus is that it leaves young children virtually untouched — a mystery virologists say may hold vital clues as to how the virus works. In China, only 2.4 percent of reported cases were children and only 0.2 percent of reported cases were children who got critically ill, according to the World Health Organization. China has reported no case of a young child dying of the disease covid-19. Meanwhile, the new coronavirus has proved especially deadly on the other end of the age spectrum. The fatality rate in China for those over 80 is an estimated 21.9 percent, per the WHO. For ages 10 to 39, however, the fatality rate is roughly 0.2 percent, according to a separate study drawing on patient records of 44,672 confirmed cases. And fatalities and severe symptoms are almost nonexistent at even younger ages. " End quote Please show me your references Of course it's an uncharted course but so far young children are relatively safe" You didn't say that to begin with, you said it only targets older people, children are still getting it, just not as bad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just watched some dirty cunt poking through the bread rolls in lidl with his hands looking for the biggest one I called him out naturally and he wandered round lidl muttering to himself in what sounded like Eastern European language probably cursing me Fucking dirty scum ( Not because he's foreign lol) Did you wear gloves when you went to Lidl? No but I used alcohol cleaner when I left and I didn't move all the unwrapped bread with my bare hands either. " Maybe this bloke used an alcohol cleaner before he arrived and touched the bread. A far better measure for preventing spread to other people than your solution of using after you've left. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Over 70's should not go on cruise ships " I've already told my nan to avoid any unnecessary trips etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Over 70's should not go on cruise ships I've already told my nan to avoid any unnecessary trips etc. " , It's a shame but wise advice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just watched some dirty cunt poking through the bread rolls in lidl with his hands looking for the biggest one I called him out naturally and he wandered round lidl muttering to himself in what sounded like Eastern European language probably cursing me Fucking dirty scum ( Not because he's foreign lol) Did you wear gloves when you went to Lidl? No but I used alcohol cleaner when I left and I didn't move all the unwrapped bread with my bare hands either. Maybe this bloke used an alcohol cleaner before he arrived and touched the bread. A far better measure for preventing spread to other people than your solution of using after you've left. " Aye right .... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Their very worse case scenario is 80% of our population infected and a mortality rate of 1%, higher in the elderly and lower in younger people. The majority of people will have very mild symptoms and anyone with symptoms is advised to stay at home for 7 days and only call 111 if you become very concerned about your symptoms. They are saying DO NOT call 111 with mild symptoms. " , | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Perhaps people are actually going to take it seriously now rather than keep spouting the same broken record regards it just being like seasonal flu and it's just a mild cold??? Actual figures between 5-10 thousand infected!!" With mild symptoms! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Perhaps people are actually going to take it seriously now rather than keep spouting the same broken record regards it just being like seasonal flu and it's just a mild cold??? Actual figures between 5-10 thousand infected!! With mild symptoms! " All capable of spreading the virus, regardless of how mild the symptoms it's these people who are more likely to spread it, each one of those people with "mild" symptoms has the capacity to infect 3 people in close proximity in the first 5 day's ten thousand turns to 40 thousand and so on..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Perhaps people are actually going to take it seriously now rather than keep spouting the same broken record regards it just being like seasonal flu and it's just a mild cold??? Actual figures between 5-10 thousand infected!! With mild symptoms! " that can be spread to the ones at risk this is the thing its ok to say im alright mate but its not as you are helping the spread to the ones it will cause misery | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I suggest you listen to the entire press conference from just mild symptoms don't mean shit" I watched the entire thing, those with symptoms, even mild ones should self isolate for at least 7 days. This advice comes from experts and professionals. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |