 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
So we have a "Labour law" that states serious foreign born criminals that serve over a year in prison here are to be deported to their country of origin after their sentence.
We then have that prick of a twat David Lammy who just so happens to be a Labour tosser shouting the odds in Parliament sagging off the Tories about a law his own party brought in, tosser.
We then have all these Liberal idiots campaigning to keep these vile individuals here but this is the question...
Would we have all these Liberal idiots wanting to keep these deportable pieces of scum here if we replaced the black Jamaicans with brown foreign born Muslim terror criminals?
I wonder.....
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I’m a proud immigrant to this country and I believe I should abide by the laws of the country.
If I committed a SERIOUS crime then I should be deported with due legal process.
Some of those kept at the detention centre didn’t receive that and quite rightly stayed behind.
It’s a touchy subject because of the Windrush disgrace so it has to be spot on legally. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I’m a proud immigrant to this country and I believe I should abide by the laws of the country.
If I committed a SERIOUS crime then I should be deported with due legal process.
Some of those kept at the detention centre didn’t receive that and quite rightly stayed behind.
It’s a touchy subject because of the Windrush disgrace so it has to be spot on legally. "
well said I agree with sending them back but let's make it water tight so no come back and seriously if you'd been here that long and still not applied for British passport to late now |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If my Mum had taken me to Jamaica as a kid, I then grow up and then decide to sell drugs & murder people, and the Jamaican government then decides to send me back to the UK. That would be my own stupid fault, wouldn't it?
How on Earth is this such a controversial matter? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns."
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"If my Mum had taken me to Jamaica as a kid, I then grow up and then decide to sell drugs & murder people, and the Jamaican government then decides to send me back to the UK. That would be my own stupid fault, wouldn't it?
How on Earth is this such a controversial matter? "
I'm really not sure to be honest. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abioMan
over a year ago
Newcastle and Gateshead |
"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns."
actually.... you might want to revise that statement...
the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs
the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......
no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.
actually.... you might want to revise that statement...
the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs
the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......
no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)
"
The real reason why some of them were not deported was because of a legal condition. The ones locked in a place in Heathrow did not have mobile network connectivity. They argued that accused should have all means of legal representation before getting deported and they couldn't get it because of this issue. Some of them gave out statements that their crimes were just possession. But all of them were sentenced for more than a year for something worse. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why have we not deported Rolf Harris?
Most probably because he's got British citizenship "
.
There's always one that tries to make out it's about racism!.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ostafunMan
over a year ago
near ipswich |
"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.
actually.... you might want to revise that statement...
the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs
the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......
no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)
"
You have to be in possession of rather a lot to be sentenced for over a year.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This is from the release website taking about offences for possession of drugs.
You are most likely to get a fine at court fordrug possession (sometimes you will also get a discharge) if it is a first offence, or it has been a long time since your last conviction. ... It is possible to go to prison for a few weeks or months for simple possession. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Let's no kid ourselves about what these bunch of foreign criminals were up to."
and we only know of what they did that they were jailed for, no idea what else the scum have done up till being caught. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Let's no kid ourselves about what these bunch of foreign criminals were up to.
and we only know of what they did that they were jailed for, no idea what else the scum have done up till being caught. "
.
Knife crime, sexual assault, r@pe, murder oh and 3 months worth of cocaine but we just couldn't prove you were dealing  .
I've no sympathy for them at all, you make your own bed in life
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.
actually.... you might want to revise that statement...
the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs
the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......
no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)
"
Sorry Fabio but that just isn't correct.
Of the ones not deported one was convicted (got off) with manslaughter for knifing a guy to death outside a pub, and another served a 12 year sentence for **ping a 17 year old girl and abducting and sexually assaulting a 15 year old.
If they are not violent criminals then I don't know who are.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All of them committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs. The scum protestors apparently misled many people by saying that they were all petty crimes. If these liberals love the criminals so much, we should keep all released criminals in one region and force the protesters live next door to them. Most of these self righteous people are the ones who live far away from the places where actual crime take place and expect the victims to act with humanitarian concerns.
actually.... you might want to revise that statement...
the 20 who were removed today committed violent crimes or dealt class A drugs
the other 30 who were suppose to be removed actually didn't......
no one is argueing about the 20! its the others that people are saying that removal is disproportionate, especially since a lot of them were 1st time offenders for thing like possession (rather than intent to supply)
Sorry Fabio but that just isn't correct.
Of the ones not deported one was convicted (got off) with manslaughter for knifing a guy to death outside a pub, and another served a 12 year sentence for **ping a 17 year old girl and abducting and sexually assaulting a 15 year old.
If they are not violent criminals then I don't know who are.
"
You and your reasoned argument! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
