FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Why do you trust Johnson?
Why do you trust Johnson?
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. " But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"i wont be voting but im guessing why peeps prefer boris to jezza is boris has always been a cunt and dont really try to hide the fact he is a cunt and people like that abput him. jezza on the other hand is trying to be all things to all ppl and people realise this also he a cunt just like boris except jezza is trying to convince people he isnt.if you are votin the trick is to decide who is the least of a cunt for you personaly" Do you trust Johnson to tell the truth, though? That was the original question. I'm wondering if anybody will come on here and say they do at this point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. " If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. " You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?" It's not a question of trust. It's people choosing the leader they feel will best act in their interests. They don't give a shit if he's a liar, as long as he's making things better for them - usually by fucking other people over. It's what they would do themselves. If people knowingly vote for him (or any other politician) even though they're aware he won't act in their interests; that's just stupidity and self-harm. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now?" No I don’t. Everyone lies. Including you! If you trust anyone, and I mean anyone in the world, to the point you think they wouldn’t lie, then, you’re massively disillusioned. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything? It's not a question of trust. It's people choosing the leader they feel will best act in their interests. They don't give a shit if he's a liar, as long as he's making things better for them - usually by fucking other people over. It's what they would do themselves. If people knowingly vote for him (or any other politician) even though they're aware he won't act in their interests; that's just stupidity and self-harm." I could have asked if people believed he'd act in their best interests. I ended up asking if people believed he'd be truthful about anything. I guess I did that as I was curious if anybody would defend Johnson in that area. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now? No I don’t. Everyone lies. Including you! If you trust anyone, and I mean anyone in the world, to the point you think they wouldn’t lie, then, you’re massively disillusioned. " I never lie, obviously. 
Joking aside, I think there's a huge difference between the lies we all tell and lies from people in power that will potentially harm a huge proportion of this country. I suppose that's why I raised his track record and asked if people trust Johnson not to lie. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. " Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now? No I don’t. Everyone lies. Including you! If you trust anyone, and I mean anyone in the world, to the point you think they wouldn’t lie, then, you’re massively disillusioned. I never lie, obviously.
Joking aside, I think there's a huge difference between the lies we all tell and lies from people in power that will potentially harm a huge proportion of this country. I suppose that's why I raised his track record and asked if people trust Johnson not to lie."Well you’ll find out before Christmas. Enjoy yourself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Does anybody believe the words that come out of Johnson's mouth, given his track record? As far as I can tell, even Johnson fans haven't defended him in that area so far." Have you spoken in person to all Jonson’s fans? And did you ascertain they were telling you the truth when they told you that? Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Does anybody believe the words that come out of Johnson's mouth, given his track record? As far as I can tell, even Johnson fans haven't defended him in that area so far. Have you spoken in person to all Jonson’s fans? And did you ascertain they were telling you the truth when they told you that? Lol" I'm asking a simple quesion right here. Any of Johnson's fans are welcome to reply here if they wish. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! " Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though." "Scruffy bastard" ? Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though. "Scruffy bastard" ? Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either." I think I’ve got the edge on Corbyn, Einstein. I note you have a black avatar as a profile pic. Enough said eh scouser | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?" The answer is: they don't care, because all they care about is winning. The right don't care about making the world a better place, or improving people's lives. Just winning. And unfortunately that's why they usually do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though. "Scruffy bastard" ? Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either. I think I’ve got the edge on Corbyn, Einstein. I note you have a black avatar as a profile pic. Enough said eh scouser "Yeah because after years of being on here i no longer meet and only use this site for the forums so have no need to have my picture on here. Its people like you why the country is fucked. Voting for someome because they know how to use a comb and not liking someone because they dont shave and heard from media he met with terrorists. Lets just ignore any policies or how a person or goverment had behaved for the past god knows how many years. Pathetic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything? The answer is: they don't care, because all they care about is winning. The right don't care about making the world a better place, or improving people's lives. Just winning. And unfortunately that's why they usually do. " I worry you might be right there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything? The answer is: they don't care, because all they care about is winning. The right don't care about making the world a better place, or improving people's lives. Just winning. And unfortunately that's why they usually do. I worry you might be right there. " Unfortunately he is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though. "Scruffy bastard" ? Hate to get personal but im sure if he seen your profile he may not have kind words to say either. I think I’ve got the edge on Corbyn, Einstein. I note you have a black avatar as a profile pic. Enough said eh scouser
Yeah because after years of being on here i no longer meet and only use this site for the forums so have no need to have my picture on here.
Its people like you why the country is fucked.
Voting for someome because they know how to use a comb and not liking someone because they dont shave and heard from media he met with terrorists.
Lets just ignore any policies or how a person or goverment had behaved for the past god knows how many years.
Pathetic.
"What’s pathetic is you’re distinct inability to read a thread and form a logical argument based on all responses. Stop being so angry scouser! Note you’ve also hidden your profile now too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation." Not according to the IRA  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA "What was he doing Frisky? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith " Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies?" I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA
What was he doing Frisky?"She's doing her usual, telling lies. This one based on an edited video the conservatives released on FB in the 2017 election. A video the tories themselves have acknowledged is selectively edited. Doubtless she will be along to say Her Majesties leader of the Opposition is a known terrorist sympathiser | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. " And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them "Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them
Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...
"Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them
Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...
Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin. "The god delusion is a good read.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA
What was he doing Frisky?
She's doing her usual, telling lies. This one based on an edited video the conservatives released on FB in the 2017 election. A video the tories themselves have acknowledged is selectively edited. Doubtless she will be along to say Her Majesties leader of the Opposition is a known terrorist sympathiser "Yep same old same old again - the trouble is I think some of the narcissistic lot on here get their pleasure from appearing more intelligent in their own eyes through following a mantra of selfishness which they think equates to success  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them
Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...
Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin. "Are justifying conservative selfishness from a evolutionary perspective. Is that your moral justification for it. As that fits neatly with the quote that started this conversation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA "On the Sophy Ridge show he said “I condemn all the bombing by both the loyalists and the IRA.” So do you prefer to get your bollocks from IRA sources then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them
Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...
Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin.
The god delusion is a good read.."Not quite what I asked you though is it. I expect delusion is something you’re very familiar with none the less. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I read this the other day and for me it rings true. The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness. John Kenneth Galbraith Might well be true. Ever heard of the Darwinian Theory of Evolution and it’s links to selfishness? I wonder if anyone has ever written anything remotely thought provoking, and managed to do it eloquently, about Steptoe and his cronies? I’m aware of Richard Dawkins and his book the selfish gene.Evolution is viewed from the perspective of DNA. And I expect you’re an authority on just how DNA, somehow, as if almost magically, doesn’t work feverishly to ensure the survival of the fittest? You see; if you must quote book titles, it does pay dividends to have at least read them before quoting them
Actually it explains why humans are altruistic...
Does your cheesy grin imply your happy with yourself because you’ve successfully managed to find one sentence on google that gave you a clue? Any thoughts of your own on Dawkin’s book? At least you didn’t spell it Dorkin.
Are justifying conservative selfishness from a evolutionary perspective.
Is that your moral justification for it.
As that fits neatly with the quote that started this conversation. "Oh you were excited enough to reply twice, I missed this one, I expected it’s something you’re used to though! Again, answer my question! Providing a new question to one you can’t answer won’t work. We’ll come back to this though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though." A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. "  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though. A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol" I bet you loved Margaret Thatcher didn’t you
She’d have sorted this mess out and had us out of Europe faster than the miners out of the pit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA
What was he doing Frisky?"He was just a supporter, not part of the peace process at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA "Why? What has he done for the IRA? Keep your answer to know facts as I know you like to tell lies | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA
What was he doing Frisky?
He was just a supporter, not part of the peace process at all."Evidence please? Define ‘supporter ‘ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. If johnstone is the best of the bunch we have we are screwed. Question. Why is jeremy corbyn a bigger c u n *. ? Whats he done in your eyes that makes him so bad? We have had nothing but the status quo for decades why not just give a guy a chance thats a bit different to what weve had. If corbyn doesnt win this time chances are he will step down as leader and another status quo leader will come in and we have decades more of the same. This is our only chance to go with somthing different for real change. If it doesnt work out hey its only 4 years and at least we can say we tried. Ive honestly no idea how anyone literally anyone could vote for the torys after everything thats gone on. Im not talking about just brexit either, everything since Cameron and austerity. I'm baffled when i hear how the torys are so far ahead in the polls. I dont think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah. I think he speaks sense a lot and has good ideas for policies. His manifesto last general election was the only one fully costed and had some great things in which im sure will be the same this time. But alas people will vote for the idiot liar that acts like a lovable buffoon. You’ve answered your own question, your words: ‘I think people should judged corbyn until hes been in power, but all i hear is oh hes a terrorist sympathisers, hes anti semetic blah blah blah’ That’s enough reasons for some people. Red Tie wearers always like to refer to their parties mistakes by making use of the words ‘blah blah’. Do carry on with everything else you’ve head that’s shit about Corbyn (not dressing it up with ‘blah blah) and I’m quite confident you’ll stand a chance of convincing yourself that voting for Johnson, is the best thing to do. You’ve still time! Ah ok so you are one of these gullable people that just because they read or hear about him being a terrorist sympathizer that makes it to be true? What makes a good leader is someome that listens to both sides. Hes not a sympathizer, hes someone that was trying to find a solution to a difficult if not impossible situation. Not according to the IRA
What was he doing Frisky?
She's doing her usual, telling lies. This one based on an edited video the conservatives released on FB in the 2017 election. A video the tories themselves have acknowledged is selectively edited. Doubtless she will be along to say Her Majesties leader of the Opposition is a known terrorist sympathiser "Of course, and an antisemite, there is plenty of data on all that from all manner of sources. I have no idea what video you're referring to, but I have a feeling if it was Christ himself on video telling you the truth about Jezza's totally unsuitable attitudes you would not believe it anyway, you are obviously a True Believer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My dilemma is simple. BREXIT aside. I like some of the things Johnson is saying but I simply don't believe he means it or will actually be able to do it. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party. I don't like many of the things Corbyn is saying but I absolutely believe he will do them if he is able to. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party." Yup, I'd never vote Tory while Boris is PM. It's one thing voting for a manifesto and then that manifesto not been fully accomplished and voting for a manifesto from a serial compulsive lier. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My dilemma is simple. BREXIT aside. I like some of the things Johnson is saying but I simply don't believe he means it or will actually be able to do it. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party. I don't like many of the things Corbyn is saying but I absolutely believe he will do them if he is able to. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party." Care to elaborate on the things you like that Johnson is saying the things you don't like that Corbyn is saying? Perhaps some examples? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"My dilemma is simple. BREXIT aside. I like some of the things Johnson is saying but I simply don't believe he means it or will actually be able to do it. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party. I don't like many of the things Corbyn is saying but I absolutely believe he will do them if he is able to. That's why I won't be voting for him or his party. Care to elaborate on the things you like that Johnson is saying the things you don't like that Corbyn is saying? Perhaps some examples? " Not really on this thread because this is about trust in Johnson, but there's plenty of time between now and the 12th December. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" not part of the peace process at all." Read Mo Mowlam's autobiography and you'll discover your view is incorrect. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though. A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol I bet you loved Margaret Thatcher didn’t you
She’d have sorted this mess out and had us out of Europe faster than the miners out of the pit "Exactly my point, why would I vote for the Tories, for a few elitists personified by greedy selfish party lead by a liar who'll lign their pockets? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?" Could you name a politician that has never lied about anything ? Seriously ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No other choice" Farage | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I like Bojo. He's intelligent, well educated, charismatic, and has injected great wit and energy into his role. He'd be a great dinner guest I reckon, whereas I'd struggle to even manage a cup of coffee with the dour Corbyn, who seems an angry man with no wit or charm, surrounded by total incompetents who I am sure would bankrupt and destroy this country in short order. Scruffy bastard can’t even have a shave either. Look at most world leaders, all smart and clean shaven. Same goes for many of the worlds most successful businesses leaders too. His tie is always crooked too. He looks like he needs a good wash, and slap. Boris has learnt to comb his hair and tuck his shirt in now, although he’s still a way to go yet. Better than a Steptoe lookalike though. A logical, rational decision on who you should vote for! Lol I bet you loved Margaret Thatcher didn’t you
She’d have sorted this mess out and had us out of Europe faster than the miners out of the pit "Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything? Could you name a politician that has never lied about anything ? Seriously !" Is that your defence of Johnson? Find me a politician that has never lied? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No other choice" Corbyn is another choice. Despite what the right wing gutter press says, he isn't a communist or many of the other things that are thrown at him. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?" Refresh my memory please. What were the two occasions he was sacked for lying? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No other choice Corbyn is another choice. Despite what the right wing gutter press says, he isn't a communist or many of the other things that are thrown at him. " ..........Absolute Boll#cks !!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No other choice Corbyn is another choice. Despite what the right wing gutter press says, he isn't a communist or many of the other things that are thrown at him. ..........Absolute Boll#cks !!!!" Come on then let’s get the “facts” to back that statement up!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper." He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it "You just aren’t really up to it are you! Come back when you have some facts at hand instead of blustering! Your posturing of intellectual and moral superiority is just shallow nonsense! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it "He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet "Are you even allowed to vote? You’ve got to be on the electoral register you know | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet
Are you even allowed to vote? You’ve got to be on the electoral register you know "Come back when you csn say something sensible | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
You just aren’t really up to it are you! Come back when you have some facts at hand instead of blustering! Your posturing of intellectual and moral superiority is just shallow nonsense!"I asked for the facts, learn to read boy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
"He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing "Johnson was sacked for also lying to his party leader about the situation. Google. And lying on the job while a journo got him sacked. ie he was sacked for not doing his job. Google again. Oh there are many more incidents of damaging lies from Johnson. I only picked the ones that got him sacked. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing "And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn. To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Another stupid reply, voting for the selfish greedy Tories i bet
Are you even allowed to vote? You’ve got to be on the electoral register you know
Come back when you csn say something sensible "It’s a legitimate question, you’re clearly annoyed at a Conservative government being in power. What that tells you is, more people voted for them than did for the likes of Steptoe and Son! So if you got yourself a permanent address, and with it, a voting right, you might be able to help Steptoe get into power. I’m sure he’d really appreciate your vote lol. That’s sensible advice lass. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing
Johnson was sacked for also lying to his party leader about the situation. Google. And lying on the job while a journo got him sacked. ie he was sacked for not doing his job. Google again.
Oh there are many more incidents of damaging lies from Johnson. I only picked the ones that got him sacked."And yet he’s still in power pmsl! Will you change your usernames and deny any knowledge of these posts when Steptoe (Corbyn) gives the UK a decent Xmas present and resigns because he got his arse kicked in the election? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing
Johnson was sacked for also lying to his party leader about the situation. Google. And lying on the job while a journo got him sacked. ie he was sacked for not doing his job. Google again.
Oh there are many more incidents of damaging lies from Johnson. I only picked the ones that got him sacked.
And yet he’s still in power pmsl!
Will you change your usernames and deny any knowledge of these posts when Steptoe (Corbyn) gives the UK a decent Xmas present and resigns because he got his arse kicked in the election? "Things are looking bad when you have to retreat to petty name calling dont you think? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it "Sacked for fabrication a front page story Sacked after being asked if he had an affair, Boris said no, he wasn't believed so he was sacked That'stthe twice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?" I am going with the Apprentice format in choosing the next government. Boris, you’ve buggered up the country and your team for the past ten years have consistently caused trouble to the UK as a whole. For that reason YOU’RE FIRED! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country "Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated. "The only thing about Boris Johnson that should be underestimated is his ability to lie to get his own way | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated. "Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia. Unless you endorse those views of course. Why should policy matter if you're quick witted and charming. Hitler was also very charismatic, would you support him because of his personal appeal? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Things are looking bad when you have to retreat to petty name calling dont you think?" I’d say they’re looking bad for your sense of humour, or lack there of. Have a look at Steptoe, and tell me there’s no resemblance | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country "Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Never trust a Tory bottom line " A lot do; it’s why they’re in power | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth "Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth "That all it takes for you? Thats enough to say thats my guy. a divisive racist who abuses office for personal gain? Is that your values? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia. "He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers. So, pick your poison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
The only thing about Boris Johnson that should be underestimated is his ability to lie to get his own way"Steptoe lies - nearly all of them do nowadays it seems. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth
Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works! "And where’s your self-proclaimed strong mind got you? Not the PM you want | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth
Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works!
And where’s your self-proclaimed strong mind got you? Not the PM you want "Null and void I’ve the FM I want | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison."Ker-ching | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Works for Donald Trump, he’s very entertaining and he’s nearly done a full term running the most powerful country on Earth
Trump is a salesman so is Boris. Cheap sales techniques to fool the weak minded and you’re right it works!
And where’s your self-proclaimed strong mind got you? Not the PM you want
Null and void I’ve the FM I want "Steptoe cheer leaders have a null and void expanse between their ears at times. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison."He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles, Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers. Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan. Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed. Lied to the Queen. Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims. The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction) I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison."Who’s in power though? It isn’t Steptoe. Whatever my beliefs or poison are, let it not concern you, because one things for sure, yours aren’t making any difference to driving this country forward because most people won’t listen to you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison."Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway. So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo. "Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Because the only alternative likely to succeed is an even bigger c u next tuesday. Johnson is best of a really shit batch. But do you actually trust him not to lie? Even now?" They all lie, just different degrees of lies. That is why they are all politicians. Cannot see why any party even campaignt..If they will do something if they get elected, why didn’t they do it when they had power. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo. "It’s easier for people to jump on the train of sheep, proverbially joining the masses. They’re guaranteed support that way, whether their argument holds water or not. Still, on a positive note, at least they behave exactly like the one they want in No.10. Gotta give ‘em that! I’ll be giving BoJo / his colleague my cross too. Not that he needs it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo. "As far as I can tell, everything Doggone just referenced is true. If only Johnson could be as truthful as Doggone.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again. "You refute ones argument dear, not them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again. "Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved. "Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided."I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen. If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
"The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing. So finding his remarks about President Obama or black people racist is due to extreme liberal political correctness. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
"And adding nicely to that, those so called 12 justices weren’t voted in by you or I either! Do you call that fair and democratic? Or do you choose to use those words for when it suits you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing. "Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I don’t care if Johnson lies He is funny, entertaining and is a do’er. He is the only leader who will pursue the outcome of the referendum. He has hit many brick walls since becoming PM but at least he continues to pursue the outcome he promised to deliver All MPs who voted were elected on a leave manifest but blocked it should be ashamed of themselves Those who swap parties after being voted in should have lost their seats and stood again for election. I vote for a party not a person, they shouldn’t be allowed to swap parties. Where would we be if a PM did that!" If this was Britain’s Got Talent, then yeah boris has my vote to win. Sadly this is “Britain needs a decent government to sort brexit out”, and he does not quite cut it here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No other choice Farage " Wasted vote like voting lib dems. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"No other choice Farage Wasted vote like voting lib dems." Agree. Contrary to popular belief on here, we’re not massive BoJo cheer leaders, just choosing the least damaged of apples. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing
And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn.
To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past.
"True, to a degree. Tories haven't picked up on Corbyn and the kiddie fiddling scandal. Imagine if that was Johnson  People would have a field day. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.
Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying."Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification' He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.
Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.
Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'
He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch"See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech. And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification' He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech. And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned. " Said by a legal and constitutional expert I presume | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing
And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn.
To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past.
True, to a degree. Tories haven't picked up on Corbyn and the kiddie fiddling scandal. Imagine if that was Johnson People would have a field day."Whoa there cowboy! You just added another lie to this little right wing wank fest - if you have a reliable source name it or rein your neck in - the forum police will get you if you tell enough lies and spread hatred without any justification - believe me theres plenty of Brexit and Boris cheerleaders who have gone unlos before you joined the party! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This should cover it. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-lies-conservative-leader-candidate-list-times-banana-brexit-bus-a8929076.html Michael Howard sacked him and so did his Newspaper. He was sacked for having an affair, like Corbyn did but he wasn't sacked. I want the two occassions he actually was sacked for lying. My suspicion is the OP lied and the normal morons believe it
He was sacked from the Times for fabricating a quote. He was later sacked by Howard for lying about an affair, and also subsequently lying to Howard. Both these things are very easy to google.
He was sacked for an affair, not lying. Corbyn had an affair, so that makes him a liar in your world too? Fabricating a quote as a jounalist; bet that has never happened before or after but not really lying in its truest form. So you had to go back over 15 years to find anything and even that was nothing, the socialist bullshit propoganda machine is already in full swing
And Tories go back 20/30 years to dig the dirt on Corbyn.
To be fair it's all bull in that regard. Seems in politics you can never move on from any past.
True, to a degree. Tories haven't picked up on Corbyn and the kiddie fiddling scandal. Imagine if that was Johnson People would have a field day.
Whoa there cowboy! You just added another lie to this little right wing wank fest - if you have a reliable source name it or rein your neck in - the forum police will get you if you tell enough lies and spread hatred without any justification - believe me theres plenty of Brexit and Boris cheerleaders who have gone unlos before you joined the party!"And there we have it, admission that if the left rlement don't like what you say they get you banned. Not surprising, the left us the least tolerant of others views. Back on point, no lies. Corbyn was involved in an abuse cover up scandal. It was Labour MPs who outed him, not Tory ones. But in your mind that must be ok. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The state of this mudslinging excuse for a debate thread, shows everything that's wrong with the country and shows just how divided and bitter everyone is. We are fucked." Yep | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.
Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.
Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'
He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch"Probably because he said he’d ‘rather be’ and not ‘will be’. If you must insist on quoting, at least do it properly and actually read and digest the material first ffs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them. Why do you trust Johnson? My answer to redress the balance. I don't." Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs! Why do you trust Johnson? Your answer: You don’t! Love it! And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all? Mini high fives, you’re ace. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them. Why do you trust Johnson? My answer to redress the balance. I don't. Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs! Why do you trust Johnson? Your answer: You don’t! Love it! And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all? Mini high fives, you’re ace. " I will let the Tories talk | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them. Why do you trust Johnson? My answer to redress the balance. I don't. Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs! Why do you trust Johnson? Your answer: You don’t! Love it! And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all? Mini high fives, you’re ace. I will let the Tories talk "Better to listen to a nice s’Tory than someone who Labours a pointless marxist view eh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.
Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.
Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'
He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch
See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.
And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned. "I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? A ruling against your preferred position is not bias. I'm very sad for you, but that is not bias. Why are you saying that it wasn't their place to rule that Parliament has supremacy according to constitutional law? What is your basis to footer this opinion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?" People can't defend the indefensible. However, they will believe a liar if they tell them the lies that they want to hear. Strange but true. Cognitive dissonance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? " Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.
Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.
Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'
He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch
See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.
And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned. ""not their place to make the ruling" What do you think their role is then? -Matt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. " Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!" A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg. -Matt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. " Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!! A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg. -Matt" Oh he's great value, I love his wit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. " Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!! A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg. -Matt Oh he's great value, I love his wit." I guess you have the privilege to see it as that. -Matt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I forgot being funny and entertaining is a massive part of running a country
Absolutely, wit and charm should never be underestimated.
Absolutely it means you can ignore the dishonesty, duplicity arrogance racism islamophobia.
He's not racist or islamophobic, I don't find him arrogant, and he is no more duplicitous than other leading politicians - with a few old school exceptions they are all a brood of vipers.
So, pick your poison.
He referred to Black People as picaninnies with watermelon smiles,
Likened Muslim Women to letter boxes and bank robbers.
Referred to President Barack Obama as Kenyan.
Described his second salary of £250,000 from the telegraph as chicken feed.
Lied to the Queen.
Blamed liverpool fans for Hillsborough and then called them victims.
The UK statistics authority called the £350 million a week number to be misleading
He can't be honest about the number of children he has (superinjuction)
I could be here all night but if all you can say is Steptoe, I can't but assume you share these sentiments. Thats your poison.
Your little list itself is full of lies and you can't even see why, so I see little point in discussing things you clearly don't understand, and to be frank I find your pedantic, humourless style boring anyway.
So you carry on worshipping your lying, antisemitic, terrorist-loving marxists by all means, it's a free country, I won't try to dissuade you, and I'll happily skip off to vote for that jovial non-PC cad Bojo.
Identify one of the above as untrue. I don't imagine you find it pleasant having your untruths called out again. I'll disregard your remark about my personality as not relevant And you will be pushed to find a single time when I have endorsed Jeremy Corbin, all I done is refuted you again.
Too boring, no point, you're too brainwashed and you can't understand the simple concepts involved.
Please try. If not for my benefit, you might persuade someone as yet undecided.
I am not seeking to persuade anyone, only state my view for my own amusement. I'll give you the simplest example of your error: The Supreme Court ruling that, after the event, BJ's prorogation was unlawful, does NOT mean that he did something illegal when he prorogued, or that he lied to anyone, let alone the Queen.
If you cannot understand the difference there you will have no hope of understanding that a refusal to adhere to extreme liberal political correctness does not equate to racism either.
The court made no ruling as to he had an improper motive and or he mislead the queen, thats not the same thing.
Exactly. So when you say 'He lied to the Queen' it's you that's lying.
Ok but you agree that 'The decision to advise Her Majesty to prorogue Parliament was unlawful because it had the effect of frustrating or preventing the ability of Parliament to carry out its constitutional functions without reasonable justification'
He certainly broke his promise about being dead in a ditch
See, you're lying again! He never 'promised to be dead in a ditch' he said he'd rather be dead in a ditch. It's a figure of speech.
And no, I don't agree with the political judgement arrived at by the biased Supreme Court. It was not their place to make the ruling, and parliament were totally flouting all legitimate constitutional functions, though of course they did absolutely NOTHING useful when they returned.
"not their place to make the ruling"
What do you think their role is then?
-Matt"Ask Blair, they were one of his machiavellian schemes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. " Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!! A positive, optimistic message? What planet are you on? Clearly not the same one as Jacob Rees Mogg. -Matt Oh he's great value, I love his wit. I guess you have the privilege to see it as that. -Matt" Lol, privilege? What, to have a sense of humour? Thanks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
""We are living in an era of divisive, negative political campaigning that seeks to disparage their opponents rather than promote their own ideals. " Totally agree. That's one of the reasons I despise Corbyn and his cronies, their endless spiteful negativity. At least Bojo is trying to promote a positive, optimistic message for once, my God what a breath of fresh air the first few months were for exactly that reason!!" Hey I promote a positive message, you can breathe me in anytime | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Only seen a couple of people answering the question here and I wasn't one of them. Why do you trust Johnson? My answer to redress the balance. I don't. Pmsl. Seriously read what you just posted ffs! Why do you trust Johnson? Your answer: You don’t! Love it! And that’s redressing a balance? What balance when you’ve answered a question you didn’t understand at all? Mini high fives, you’re ace. I will let the Tories talk
Better to listen to a nice s’Tory than someone who Labours a pointless marxist view eh "Marx made some excellent observations. Unfortunately capitalism enslaved us all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is. I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments. "Dark colours suit my shape more | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is. I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments.
Dark colours suit my shape more "Typical bloody darker. Don't you know lighter colours are the only sane choice? And I hear those who wear dark colours secretly think they hear voices from aliens in their heads. And they snore in code! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is. I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments.
Dark colours suit my shape more
Typical bloody darker. Don't you know lighter colours are the only sane choice? And I hear those who wear dark colours secretly think they hear voices from aliens in their heads. And they snore in code!"
Damn I've been rumbled! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It does seem any thread in this area gets torturously twisted. It doesn't matter how simple or factual the OP is. I'm tempted to start a thread asking people what their favourite colour is. Just to see if it ends in bizarre arguments. "Speaking of yourself in the third person is as twisted and tortuous as one can be, but carry on; you’ll get to tell your mates you started a thread and someone gave it time of day | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. " What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders? "Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question? Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us! "Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make? Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all? "Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate! "Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are? Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me? Do I give a toss? Hmmm. I guess I just don't know? You are risable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable "Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress "I just don't know do I? What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"This is mainly a question for Johnson fans. He was sacked twice for lying. Even if you discount all his political lies, doesn't that fact worry you? Why do you trust him to tell the truth about anything?" My apologies for the diversion, bit nobody was answering you anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks? "Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now! Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!"Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!
Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy? "I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!
Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?
I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport? "How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions? Night, night. Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased. It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!
Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?
I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?
How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?
Night, night.
Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.
It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.
"Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" If this was Britain’s Got Talent, then yeah boris has my vote to win. Sadly this is “Britain needs a decent government to sort brexit out”, and he does not quite cut it here." ... So if Boris won’t get Brexit done, who will? Sure as hell won’t be the teeny Lib Dem party Or the ‘no fecking clue what to do’ Labour Party | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
"On the contrary cherie - if a High Court Judgement is not biased, I like it. You think mocking the PM and crowing about ruling against him is appropriate for the President of the Supreme Court? I expect way higher standards, total impartiality, and total allegiance to the UK, not a conflict of interest with any foreign power. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!
Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?
I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?
How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?
Night, night.
Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.
It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.
Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?"Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!
Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?
I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?
How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?
Night, night.
Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.
It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.
Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?
Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport!"Not playing him, just wanted a discussion in English! Has anyone ever listened to a suggestion of yours sport? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
On the contrary cherie - if a High Court Judgement is not biased, I like it.
You think mocking the PM and crowing about ruling against him is appropriate for the President of the Supreme Court? I expect way higher standards, total impartiality, and total allegiance to the UK, not a conflict of interest with any foreign power.
"And yet to expect higher standards of our PM and expect them to not deliberately break the law and then try to lie about it... is somehow not something that concerns you? -Matt | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" If this was Britain’s Got Talent, then yeah boris has my vote to win. Sadly this is “Britain needs a decent government to sort brexit out”, and he does not quite cut it here. ... So if Boris won’t get Brexit done, who will? Sure as hell won’t be the teeny Lib Dem party Or the ‘no fecking clue what to do’ Labour Party" If you want a ‘proper ‘ Brexit then you will have to vote Brexit Ltd, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!
Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?
I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?
How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?
Night, night.
Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.
It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.
Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?
Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport!
Not playing him, just wanted a discussion in English! Has anyone ever listened to a suggestion of yours sport? "They probably listen to me as much as they listen to you dearie! Maybe I just have a higher appreciation of the futility of picking personal fights | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" I find this an interesting assertion. "The biased Supreme Court". What's your evidence for it? Their known bias and their biased statements. "A ruling against your preferred position is not bias." Indeed not. They are biased nonetheless. I agree with the High Court that it was not a justicable matter. What is "their known bias". Explain the statement. Provide some examples. "Their biased statements". Such as? You like the High Court judgement so it is not biased?
You do know how the legal system in this country works right? The High Court cannot make new law. This action had no precedent.
The entire UK Supreme Court ruled against the Government.
Every single sitting judge.
I'm interested to know what your basis in constitutional law is to disagree with the Justices of the Supreme Courtbother than "their known bias".
What is your preference? Judges appointed by the government to carry out their orders?
Ffs...one line from your soporific tones raised a smile ‘You like the High Court Judgement so it’s not biased’? Sounds like you’re not quite sure enough yourself there sport! Making a statement, but then babbing your pants and falling short at the end by sticking a question mark on it! What will it be oh wise one, statement, or question?
Any thoughts of your own to add? Go on, entertain us!
Vital and pedantic point of syntax to make?
Unable to address the question so find something else to distract with?
Have you any useful thoughts at all?
Jeez, even your come backs are riddled with doubt! Make a statement or ask a question, then we might know what you want! Or are you actually seeking some sort of verification relating to the validity of your ....what is it again? Pmsl
So, your thoughts, what are they? Come on, chop chop, there’s only so much thong plucking from your arse we’ll tolerate!
Am I mocking you for trying to prove how clever you are?
Are you proving that you are a bully by trying to pick me?
Do I give a toss?
Hmmm. I guess I just don't know?
You are risable
Just wondering why everything you write is filled with doubt and finishes with a question mark.
Stop being so defensive and let us know whether your making a statement or asking a question.. Then we may make progress
I just don't know do I?
What do you think my opinion should be?
Is Boris Johnson a liar?
Is the Supreme Court biased?
Was the High Court opinion better in legal terms?
Do you have any opinions or do you prefer to make personal attacks?
Personal attacks! Ah, you’re playing the victim card instead of answering a question! Or are you? I really don’t know now!
Waltz in here attempting to give other users a whipping based on home-spun philosophy, doesn’t always end well for perpetrators either. No one is picking on you, you’ve simply being asked to clarify a few things after you tried to be clever...and now suddenly you’re being picked on. What’s next then sport? Any chance of an answer or 10 to the questions I posed to you? Just for a change eh!
Oh sweetie
What do you know? Anything other than you think Boris Johnson is just dreamy?
I find you dreamy, first person in a while who’ll give me a good nights kip and make me feel grateful that I am me...and not...errr...someone else. See what I did there sport?
How come you are so insecure as to need me to verify your actions?
Night, night.
Bless you for making such a useful contribution to why Johnson is a trustworthy liar and why the Supreme Court and High Courts may or may not be biased.
It's all so much clearer as you stayed in point and didn't spend any time trying to look clever by questioning syntax and self confidence.
Would you like a chocolate or strawberry ice cream? Or a Dime bar?
Playing the man instead of the game always smacks of failure - I would suggest you need to up your game sport!
Not playing him, just wanted a discussion in English! Has anyone ever listened to a suggestion of yours sport?
They probably listen to me as much as they listen to you dearie! Maybe I just have a higher appreciation of the futility of picking personal fights "Maybe? Still unsure then. You waded into this one all on your own little guy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
