FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > extinction rebellion
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask " Is that what you think XR are asking for? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask " Christ this rebel without a clue act is getting tiresome! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask " Are you on the sherry tonight? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask " Starting to believe people should pass a basic intelligence test before being allowed to vote. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"christ when did people stop havin a sense of humour" Just pointing out our non violent peaceful protest can achieve stuff.Isnt that the point of protesting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"protest all ya like mate i got better things to do with my time.was u there for the whole two weeks? hope that wasnt u at canning town. " You upset bro that XR achieved one of their goals?? You said it was all pointless right?? I donated to help pay for the lawyers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"upset nah not me.im dissapointed bob i thought you being fabs resident tree hugger you would be glueing yaself to an electric train with the best of them.also what did they achieve apart from giving people on there way to earn a living the hump " It’s a positive day when peaceful non violent protestors achieve one of their goals.Youll enjoy the clean air in London one day.You can thank the green movement later. Positivity and peace brother.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s been said XR achieve nothing. A citizens' assembly has been a key demand of the environmental campaign group Extinction Rebellion. Letters are being sent to 30,000 households across the UK inviting people to join a citizens' assembly on climate change. The initiative, set up by cross party MPs, will look at what members of the public can do to reduce CO2.. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-50264797 " Thats a lot of trees they've cut down as a result. Didn't think that one through did they | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i dont vote bob but not to stupid to realise with labour they are oppotunists.at least the greens torys and lib dems have a position labour on other hand there position is whatever is the most popular thing to support from one week to the nxt.i meen there for saving the planet this week nxt week if opening coal mines would win em a cpl of votes they would be all for that.i may not vote but at least i recognise that some partys have there beliefs others have none just watever will get them a vote and that never works our well" I suppose the Greenies should now be wearing the old "dole not coal" badges from Maggies Spitting Image character. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"upset nah not me.im dissapointed bob i thought you being fabs resident tree hugger you would be glueing yaself to an electric train with the best of them.also what did they achieve apart from giving people on there way to earn a living the hump It’s a positive day when peaceful non violent protestors achieve one of their goals.Youll enjoy the clean air in London one day.You can thank the green movement later. Positivity and peace brother.. " . You mean London's air pollution from diesel vehicles?. Hmmm I wonder which group of green eco nutjobs pushed for that idea | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask " I can't tell. Pretending to be stupid and racist or actual beliefs? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask I can't tell. Pretending to be stupid and racist or actual beliefs?" . Neither just trolling the extinction rebellion liars and end of the world cultists! Are you one of them?.I can't tell | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers " . Ssshh There's big money behind them . No seriously I always find it slightly hilarious that the wind generation industry which is full of CEOs earning big bucks has the green party and these ER morons as there pr branch. I mean really! Have they actually looked at what happens when you favour loads of wind generation over a mixture, do they realise the great Satan America has reduced it's c02 more than the EU in the last ten years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask I can't tell. Pretending to be stupid and racist or actual beliefs?. Neither just trolling the extinction rebellion liars and end of the world cultists! Are you one of them?.I can't tell" Well if you mean do I believe in man made global warming, then yes. There is overwhelming scientific evidence to show the damage that we are doing to the planet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask " Yawn. You're sounding as desperate for controversy as Farage | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers " Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic." "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites " Name calling, false equivalences and ignoring facts are all I can see. Having facts dismissed as socialist propaganda from libtards is hard to rebut or engage. But one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites Name calling, false equivalences and ignoring facts are all I can see. Having facts dismissed as socialist propaganda from libtards is hard to rebut or engage. But one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across." Your having a laugh mate all ive seen is angry remainers standing outside the HOC every day shouting and holding demos while leavers are just getting on with their lives. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites Name calling, false equivalences and ignoring facts are all I can see. Having facts dismissed as socialist propaganda from libtards is hard to rebut or engage. But one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across.Your having a laugh mate all ive seen is angry remainers standing outside the HOC every day shouting and holding demos while leavers are just getting on with their lives." *Whole leavers are blissfully unaware that they've been conned getting on with their lives. Just because some people are unaware of what's going on in the world around them. Doesn't mean it's wrong for people who do, to speak out against it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites Name calling, false equivalences and ignoring facts are all I can see. Having facts dismissed as socialist propaganda from libtards is hard to rebut or engage. But one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across.Your having a laugh mate all ive seen is angry remainers standing outside the HOC every day shouting and holding demos while leavers are just getting on with their lives. *Whole leavers are blissfully unaware that they've been conned getting on with their lives. Just because some people are unaware of what's going on in the world around them. Doesn't mean it's wrong for people who do, to speak out against it." Totally agree everyone is entitled to an opinion i just dont agree that the "one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across" i think its the remainers who come across as angry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites Name calling, false equivalences and ignoring facts are all I can see. Having facts dismissed as socialist propaganda from libtards is hard to rebut or engage. But one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across.Your having a laugh mate all ive seen is angry remainers standing outside the HOC every day shouting and holding demos while leavers are just getting on with their lives. *Whole leavers are blissfully unaware that they've been conned getting on with their lives. Just because some people are unaware of what's going on in the world around them. Doesn't mean it's wrong for people who do, to speak out against it.Totally agree everyone is entitled to an opinion i just dont agree that the "one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across" i think its the remainers who come across as angry." I would agree that level of anger is unrelated to which which way you would have voted in. But I would say remainers are more angry since the referendum, because there is more to be angry about. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites Name calling, false equivalences and ignoring facts are all I can see. Having facts dismissed as socialist propaganda from libtards is hard to rebut or engage. But one thing that is common to many leavers is how angry they come across.Your having a laugh mate all ive seen is angry remainers standing outside the HOC every day shouting and holding demos while leavers are just getting on with their lives." My apologies, I should have been clearer. What I meant was online, in large part, its 'shut up, we won, you lost remonaners' You have to acknowledge the massive protests there has been against leaving. You're right, the whole debate is toxic. People that voted remain are angry for all sorts of reasons, many relating to the lies told during the referendum, the whole issue being used for political gain by cameron, farage, johnson...... But I've yet to hear a remainer imply the threat of violence or civil disobedience to achieve their aims. Unfortunately violence has been used and threatened against people for opposing Brexit. There is an MP a conservative who is still advised by police not to reveal her location | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still nobody can answer my question .how do the full time protesters make a living ...where do they get the money to stuff themselves with burgers in McDonalds after a long day on the streets " How do you know there are full time protesters and they like to gorge on McDs? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still nobody can answer my question .how do the full time protesters make a living ...where do they get the money to stuff themselves with burgers in McDonalds after a long day on the streets " Put "extinction rebellion protesters paid" into Google. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Wow would not mind getting that cash for doing nothing all day .2 things ...1 I wonder are they paying income tax 2 .who are the fat cats giving them all the money .ad if they have any extra left over .the poor and the sick children could do with some support " All you need is a big mouth mate, stand outside the HOC and shout stop brexit ever other minute you can also have a nice little flat down the road from reece mogg. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still nobody can answer my question .how do the full time protesters make a living ...where do they get the money to stuff themselves with burgers in McDonalds after a long day on the streets Put "extinction rebellion protesters paid" into Google. " You read the Mail and Express articles then? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/extinction-rebellion-protests-funding_uk_5da09183e4b02c9da0495bba https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/extinction-rebellion-protesters-bank-balance-is-growing-by-40-000-a-day-z9b8vcc62 Very high levels of crowdfunding with small sums and a few large donors. It is shocking that over a hundred of them are paid as much as £400 per week. Just over £20k a year. Snouts in the trough! The thousands working for free are just mugs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Believe me I do . Know one pretty well ..see him collecting his dole money on Fridays regularly ." You know one? Obviously that tells your all that you need to know about every one of the thousands of individuals involved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Believe me I do . Know one pretty well ..see him collecting his dole money on Fridays regularly ." Will someone please answer me how does this full time moaner make a living. Because believe me, all he does is moan and eat burger kings all day | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Believe me I do . Know one pretty well ..see him collecting his dole money on Fridays regularly . Will someone please answer me how does this full time moaner make a living. Because believe me, all he does is moan and eat burger kings all day " Sounds like a perfectly capitalisty thing to do to me. They're providing a service - I'm willing to pay for that service... dunno what the rightists are moaning about tbh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Waisters Anything except do a days work ....... If it wasn't climate change .or Brexit .it would be something else" You shouldn’t doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world . Throughout history it’s always been small groups that started monumental changes . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Waisters Anything except do a days work ....... If it wasn't climate change .or Brexit .it would be something else You shouldn’t doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world . Throughout history it’s always been small groups that started monumental changes . " And there have always been those who sat on their arses and insulted and criticized those who speak out and try to fight for a positive change. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still nobody can answer my question .how do the full time protesters make a living ...where do they get the money to stuff themselves with burgers in McDonalds after a long day on the streets Put "extinction rebellion protesters paid" into Google. You read the Mail and Express articles then? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/extinction-rebellion-protests-funding_uk_5da09183e4b02c9da0495bba https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/extinction-rebellion-protesters-bank-balance-is-growing-by-40-000-a-day-z9b8vcc62 Very high levels of crowdfunding with small sums and a few large donors. It is shocking that over a hundred of them are paid as much as £400 per week. Just over £20k a year. Snouts in the trough! The thousands working for free are just mugs." No, I read it in the Asahi Shimbum, but I didn't think any of you guys could read Japanese. It's a simple enough search term | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Good to see the high Court has ruled the London protest ban on XR unlawful. The police could now face claims for false imprisonment from hundreds of protesters. The Met seems to have over stepped the line with their ban of more than two XR protestors assembling. " If the people arrested were blocking the highway then that act in it's self is against the law. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Good to see the high Court has ruled the London protest ban on XR unlawful. The police could now face claims for false imprisonment from hundreds of protesters. The Met seems to have over stepped the line with their ban of more than two XR protestors assembling. If the people arrested were blocking the highway then that act in it's self is against the law. " I think the high court had no issue with that . I believe It was how the Met used the public order act .That was unlawful. The ruling was made specifically on whether officers could arrest demonstrators for assembling in central London. People I believe have the right to assemble and protest.The high court agrees. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Good to see the high Court has ruled the London protest ban on XR unlawful. The police could now face claims for false imprisonment from hundreds of protesters. The Met seems to have over stepped the line with their ban of more than two XR protestors assembling. " Yeah i can see a lot of of them putting in nice little claims against the met, as if they havnt cost us all enough already with all the extra police needed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still nobody can answer my question .how do the full time protesters make a living ...where do they get the money to stuff themselves with burgers in McDonalds after a long day on the streets Put "extinction rebellion protesters paid" into Google. You read the Mail and Express articles then? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/extinction-rebellion-protests-funding_uk_5da09183e4b02c9da0495bba https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/extinction-rebellion-protesters-bank-balance-is-growing-by-40-000-a-day-z9b8vcc62 Very high levels of crowdfunding with small sums and a few large donors. It is shocking that over a hundred of them are paid as much as £400 per week. Just over £20k a year. Snouts in the trough! The thousands working for free are just mugs. No, I read it in the Asahi Shimbum, but I didn't think any of you guys could read Japanese. It's a simple enough search term " So there is no way of the rest of us reading whatever they've written. Handy. No comment the information that I have provided. Good swerve whilst looking superior | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Good to see the high Court has ruled the London protest ban on XR unlawful. The police could now face claims for false imprisonment from hundreds of protesters. The Met seems to have over stepped the line with their ban of more than two XR protestors assembling. " Actually the ruling was based on a technicality. The officer has to be physically present to read the order so it is impossible to apply it across the whole city. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Good to see the high Court has ruled the London protest ban on XR unlawful. The police could now face claims for false imprisonment from hundreds of protesters. The Met seems to have over stepped the line with their ban of more than two XR protestors assembling. Yeah i can see a lot of of them putting in nice little claims against the met, as if they havnt cost us all enough already with all the extra police needed. " That's how the law works. Is it better to ignore it or arbitrarily change the rules? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Good to see the high Court has ruled the London protest ban on XR unlawful. The police could now face claims for false imprisonment from hundreds of protesters. The Met seems to have over stepped the line with their ban of more than two XR protestors assembling. Actually the ruling was based on a technicality. The officer has to be physically present to read the order so it is impossible to apply it across the whole city." That makes sense.Rather than a blanket ban across the entire city . The XR protestors used the same tactics as the protestors in Hong Kong.They took their inspiration from Bruce Lee and his philosophy “Be like water “. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still nobody can answer my question .how do the full time protesters make a living ...where do they get the money to stuff themselves with burgers in McDonalds after a long day on the streets Put "extinction rebellion protesters paid" into Google. You read the Mail and Express articles then? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/extinction-rebellion-protests-funding_uk_5da09183e4b02c9da0495bba https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/extinction-rebellion-protesters-bank-balance-is-growing-by-40-000-a-day-z9b8vcc62 Very high levels of crowdfunding with small sums and a few large donors. It is shocking that over a hundred of them are paid as much as £400 per week. Just over £20k a year. Snouts in the trough! The thousands working for free are just mugs. No, I read it in the Asahi Shimbum, but I didn't think any of you guys could read Japanese. It's a simple enough search term So there is no way of the rest of us reading whatever they've written. Handy. No comment the information that I have provided. Good swerve whilst looking superior " It is the language of my country. Instead of sneering moronically, why not learn another language instead of wallowing in ignorance? You're just another typical little Englander who thinks shouting louder will make you understood? And I've read some of your other posts - I don't need to look superior to you, I am - vastly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"“Vastly superior” ..Jesus titty Christ bingo that’s some hubris fella. " As Bob Marley said, there's confidence in truth | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"“Vastly superior” ..Jesus titty Christ bingo that’s some hubris fella. As Bob Marley said, there's confidence in truth " ...and vainglorious pomposity Touchy too. I haven't answered at anything. I simply stated that we are, conveniently, unable to read your source. I have answered at nothing. Get a grip. Well done though. Good swerve. Informing the information that contradicts you whilst pointing to a source of "truth" that cannot be interrogated | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Love it when someone goes into a 'but I'm so much smarter than you!' teenage tantrum. Always entertaining " well if English is not his 1st language i would say he is in the language stakes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still nobody can answer my question .how do the full time protesters make a living ...where do they get the money to stuff themselves with burgers in McDonalds after a long day on the streets Put "extinction rebellion protesters paid" into Google. You read the Mail and Express articles then? https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/extinction-rebellion-protests-funding_uk_5da09183e4b02c9da0495bba https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/extinction-rebellion-protesters-bank-balance-is-growing-by-40-000-a-day-z9b8vcc62 Very high levels of crowdfunding with small sums and a few large donors. It is shocking that over a hundred of them are paid as much as £400 per week. Just over £20k a year. Snouts in the trough! The thousands working for free are just mugs. No, I read it in the Asahi Shimbum, but I didn't think any of you guys could read Japanese. It's a simple enough search term So there is no way of the rest of us reading whatever they've written. Handy. No comment the information that I have provided. Good swerve whilst looking superior It is the language of my country. Instead of sneering moronically, why not learn another language instead of wallowing in ignorance? You're just another typical little Englander who thinks shouting louder will make you understood? And I've read some of your other posts - I don't need to look superior to you, I am - vastly." I can count in Japenese, tell you how to fight and use a couple of niceties after that I'm done | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Love it when someone goes into a 'but I'm so much smarter than you!' teenage tantrum. Always entertaining well if English is not his 1st language i would say he is in the language stakes. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"“Vastly superior” ..Jesus titty Christ bingo that’s some hubris fella. As Bob Marley said, there's confidence in truth " Self praise is no praise ..Lord Byron. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"“Vastly superior” ..Jesus titty Christ bingo that’s some hubris fella. As Bob Marley said, there's confidence in truth ...and vainglorious pomposity Touchy too. I haven't answered at anything. I simply stated that we are, conveniently, unable to read your source. I have answered at nothing. Get a grip. Well done though. Good swerve. Informing the information that contradicts you whilst pointing to a source of "truth" that cannot be interrogated " The autocorrect made this gibberish. It may have been gibberish already though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Love it when someone goes into a 'but I'm so much smarter than you!' teenage tantrum. Always entertaining well if English is not his 1st language i would say he is in the language stakes. " Uh, yeah. People who speak more than one language are better at languages than those who don't. That's not what the poster was saying, though. Did you just want to disagree with me but not have anything relevant to actually say? Bless. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Love it when someone goes into a 'but I'm so much smarter than you!' teenage tantrum. Always entertaining well if English is not his 1st language i would say he is in the language stakes. Uh, yeah. People who speak more than one language are better at languages than those who don't. That's not what the poster was saying, though. Did you just want to disagree with me but not have anything relevant to actually say? Bless. " Not at all just pointing out a fact glad you agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites " . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. " Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask I can't tell. Pretending to be stupid and racist or actual beliefs?" He's not pretending to be stupid. He just likes the attention. He's harmless. Pay him no mind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret " . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The planet is on fire in a dessert under water and to solve it you need to give all your money to poor people, black people and refugees so that they too can have a 4x4 and if you disagree at all your evil, even more evil than a nazi wearing a clown mask I can't tell. Pretending to be stupid and racist or actual beliefs? He's not pretending to be stupid. He just likes the attention. He's harmless. Pay him no mind." Thanks babes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. " Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good " . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Dr Tamsin Edwards who is on the IPCC lambasted the green party candidate Rupert read for filling children's heads with scary nonsense,Dr Maslin another climate scientist backed her up,I do not feel it is appropriate to try and burden young people with a personal apocalyptic vision of the future, which is not supported by climate change research. Oh dear oh dear, the lying greens trying to scare people into voting for They're Doomsday cult." I would also like to know what all this is doing to children's mental health. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"‘Tis the season to be jolly ..Trollolol lol lol..lol.. " yeah make the most of it bob not that many left if XR are to believed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"‘Tis the season to be jolly ..Trollolol lol lol..lol.. yeah make the most of it bob not that many left if XR are to believed. " Cool Dude. Tell that to the 11,000 climate scientists https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-emergency-scientists-emissions-letter-climate-change-a9185786.html%3famp | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about " Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy " . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"‘Tis the season to be jolly ..Trollolol lol lol..lol.. yeah make the most of it bob not that many left if XR are to believed. Cool Dude. Tell that to the 11,000 climate scientists https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-emergency-scientists-emissions-letter-climate-change-a9185786.html%3famp" . No that's an opinion piece, there's no science there!. C- try harder | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"9 out of 10 science cats can’t be wrong .. " . That's not science either. D- try even harder | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"YouTube videos at dawn... " . To be fair I always thought you got your bullshit XR science from there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. " I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? " . Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Peer reviewed YouTube accounts.. " . Really? Go on then, find me a couple of peer reviewed papers that back up your green party shit you spout all day long, I'll look forward to seeing them and studying them myself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Peer reviewed YouTube accounts.. . Really? Go on then, find me a couple of peer reviewed papers that back up your green party shit you spout all day long, I'll look forward to seeing them and studying them myself. " If you tried harder to understand what's going on in the world around you. Maybe you'd be able to direct your anger in the right direction. IE, not at people trying to make a positive change. I would suggest starting out by reading what scientific method means. Then just read up on the basics of climate change. If you're able to understand the subject matter, you'll be able to debate it. Knowledge is power. Lack of knowledge equals confusion and lots of nonsensical posts on a swingers forum. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? . Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea" Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? . Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm " There is another alternative that he believes its a problem but not man made so not quiet true. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Peer reviewed YouTube accounts.. . Really? Go on then, find me a couple of peer reviewed papers that back up your green party shit you spout all day long, I'll look forward to seeing them and studying them myself. If you tried harder to understand what's going on in the world around you. Maybe you'd be able to direct your anger in the right direction. IE, not at people trying to make a positive change. I would suggest starting out by reading what scientific method means. Then just read up on the basics of climate change. If you're able to understand the subject matter, you'll be able to debate it. Knowledge is power. Lack of knowledge equals confusion and lots of nonsensical posts on a swingers forum." You can lead a right wing climate change denier to the truth but the confirmation bias is strong in most of them.So they don’t drink from the cup of knowledge Let them be and don’t feed after dark or get them wet... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? . Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm There is another alternative that he believes its a problem but not man made so not quiet true." Go on then, show us the papers You will believe what you want to believe rather than what the data says. I mean, how could billions of people change the climate over a couple of centuries due to activities that have never taken place before in planetary history? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? . Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm There is another alternative that he believes its a problem but not man made so not quiet true. Go on then, show us the papers You will believe what you want to believe rather than what the data says. I mean, how could billions of people change the climate over a couple of centuries due to activities that have never taken place before in planetary history? " Im not getting into a climate change debate again it just goes round in circles i was merely pointing out that there wasn't one one alternative. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? . Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm There is another alternative that he believes its a problem but not man made so not quiet true. Go on then, show us the papers You will believe what you want to believe rather than what the data says. I mean, how could billions of people change the climate over a couple of centuries due to activities that have never taken place before in planetary history? " Im not getting into a climate change debate again it just goes round in circles i was merely pointing out that there wasn't one one alternative. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can someone answer a question .all these protesters who stay on the streets for weeks. How do they support themselves . Example..food clothes mortgages etc etc ..or have they got very good employers Why are the far right so determined to dodge any meaningful conversation on climate change? Attacking the protesters instead of engaging in the actual issues is a piss poor tactic. "Man on Fire" has conducted extensive personal research that conclusively proves that climate change will not cause the destruction of all life on Earth tomorrow so it isn't true. It also snowed quite heavily so "global warming" isn't a thing. He doesn't want to share this though as it will make us lazy and we should do it ourselves. It's not that it's from unverifiable partisan websites . I didn't need to do anything scientists do it for me, like they handed Richard Reid from XR and his crazy followers on here their arses on Twitter, quite clearly and very firmly they told him to stop lying and using scare stories to which he obviously denied but then doubled down on. I mean who'd have thought it, actually IPCC climate change scientists telling him to shut the fuck up and stop talking bollocks, oh how I laughed at him and his crazy cultist followers on here. Excellent. Share the link or the appropriate search terms and site. We can all take a look, unless it's a secret . Are you not following your crazed Marxist XR spokesperson Rupert read on Twitter?. Blah, blah No link to "the truth" given Blah, blah Looking good . Doesn't look good when you've defended a group the former head of intelligence has described as Marxist anarchists hell bent on the downfall of the UK society I'll admit. I know you seem desperate for me to add it but i'm not sure if Twitter is an allowed link and somebody is always squealing on me to the mods. Just Google Rupert read Twitter and you'll see him getting his arse handed to him by people that actually do the science and know the world isn't on fire, underwater and no imminent Doomsday for you Marxist to blah blah blah about Blah, blah Still no information on why man-made climate change is somehow discredited except to bang on about some guy that nobody's heard of. Blah blah Give us the link to the information that shows the IPPC to be making stuff up. Should be easy . I dare you to find me one sentence I've wrote defying climate science!. Where as what I'm doing is debunking your bullshit XR climate Doomsday bollocks, well I'm not, but several climate scientists on the IPCC are. I don't give a ball-hang about XR. They aren't "mine" sweetie You have denied climate change on another thread. Not enough consensus apparently. No data then either. Extinction Rebellion are doing something though. What are you doing other than demanding attention on a smaller stage with less consequence? . Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm There is another alternative that he believes its a problem but not man made so not quiet true. Go on then, show us the papers You will believe what you want to believe rather than what the data says. I mean, how could billions of people change the climate over a couple of centuries due to activities that have never taken place before in planetary history? Im not getting into a climate change debate again it just goes round in circles i was merely pointing out that there wasn't one one alternative. " They are not "alternatives" at all. It's like "debating" if vaccination is a good idea. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone who doesn't believe that 40 years of weather research doesn't prove that man made climate change is real needs their head examined! " I’ll call your 40 years of weather research and raise you 2.7 million years of ice core data. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"How long has venice got left by the way? Need to get a real Cornetto before it goes full Atlantis. " Wait. There are "real cornetto's"? Like not the pre packaged ones! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone who doesn't believe that 40 years of weather research doesn't prove that man made climate change is real needs their head examined! " You really think that the activities of billions of people suddenly changing the chemical composition of the atmosphere and land and sea makes no difference to the climate system? Really? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm " . Funnily enough yes, that's what I've always said, that's what the science says, what it doesn't say is anything that your Marxist crazy comrades claim, world's not going to end in ten years and teenagers will make adulthood just fine. As Dr Tamsin told your leader, shut the fuck up with the Doomsday talk it ain't happening and there's no real scientific evidence that it ever will. And besides all this the UK is one of the smallest contributors of C02 and is taking there's down. The big four are USA China India and the EU and only one of them has reduced there c02 every year for the last 6 years. Can you guess who it is? That's right, it's Donald trump's America, nothing to do with trump of course and everything to do with technology and cheap fracked gas and that is why we should listen to experts in there fields and not middle class dipshit Marxist end of the world cultists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm . Funnily enough yes, that's what I've always said, that's what the science says, what it doesn't say is anything that your Marxist crazy comrades claim, world's not going to end in ten years and teenagers will make adulthood just fine. As Dr Tamsin told your leader, shut the fuck up with the Doomsday talk it ain't happening and there's no real scientific evidence that it ever will. And besides all this the UK is one of the smallest contributors of C02 and is taking there's down. The big four are USA China India and the EU and only one of them has reduced there c02 every year for the last 6 years. Can you guess who it is? That's right, it's Donald trump's America, nothing to do with trump of course and everything to do with technology and cheap fracked gas and that is why we should listen to experts in there fields and not middle class dipshit Marxist end of the world cultists. " What's up with you cutie pie? Why are your knickers in such a twist? Suddenly a believer, but you don't want anybody to do anything? He's not my leader. In fact, they don't have a leader according to them. Everybody will survive ten or twenty years but it will get progressively more difficult. The point of Extinction Rebellion is speed the process with publicity. Calm discussion doesn't work. You are yammering about it now though China and India's economies are growing. Something we did years ago. We could try to keep them in poverty, but they don't seem keen on that. Regardless, they are very heavily investing in renewables. They've also signed up to the Paris Climate accord. We could all do nothing though. If you prefer Renewable energy is cheaper than fossil now. The economics will push in one direction anyway, particularly if Thorium salt reactors and more efficient storage methods come online. Faster is better though. Right or wrong? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm . Funnily enough yes, that's what I've always said, that's what the science says, what it doesn't say is anything that your Marxist crazy comrades claim, world's not going to end in ten years and teenagers will make adulthood just fine. As Dr Tamsin told your leader, shut the fuck up with the Doomsday talk it ain't happening and there's no real scientific evidence that it ever will. And besides all this the UK is one of the smallest contributors of C02 and is taking there's down. The big four are USA China India and the EU and only one of them has reduced there c02 every year for the last 6 years. Can you guess who it is? That's right, it's Donald trump's America, nothing to do with trump of course and everything to do with technology and cheap fracked gas and that is why we should listen to experts in there fields and not middle class dipshit Marxist end of the world cultists. What's up with you cutie pie? Why are your knickers in such a twist? Suddenly a believer, but you don't want anybody to do anything? He's not my leader. In fact, they don't have a leader according to them. Everybody will survive ten or twenty years but it will get progressively more difficult. The point of Extinction Rebellion is speed the process with publicity. Calm discussion doesn't work. You are yammering about it now though China and India's economies are growing. Something we did years ago. We could try to keep them in poverty, but they don't seem keen on that. Regardless, they are very heavily investing in renewables. They've also signed up to the Paris Climate accord. We could all do nothing though. If you prefer Renewable energy is cheaper than fossil now. The economics will push in one direction anyway, particularly if Thorium salt reactors and more efficient storage methods come online. Faster is better though. Right or wrong?" . You remind me of Micheal Jackson, he's black he's white!. Anyhow all of what you wrote is utter tits, never been a denier, never been against doing anything, renewable energy isn't cheaper than fossil fuel, calm discussion does work, India aren't doing shit. The only truth wrote on this thread is mine. Donald trump's USA have cut their emissions every year for 6 years unlike the EU's which has gone up every year. Ps calling me sweetie pie is just a giveaway to your real identity, Bobby boy I'm way ahead of you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Oooo sweetie don't get tense. So you couldn't find anything I wrote that said what you've personally claimed several times on here, yes your a liar as well, then you've doubled down on their bullshit claiming there not yours! yea whatever sweetpea Not in this thread. I didn't claim that. You smear your bs around so liberally though Are you saying that you've never refuted the peer reviewed scientific consensus? You know that you have, but you do like a good quibble with syntax so that you can "win" don't you. Sweetheart Happily you now seem to agree completely that man-made climate is a serious problem that requires immediate action to resolve. Happy days The only other alternative is...that you don't believe that climate change is a problem. Hmmmm . Funnily enough yes, that's what I've always said, that's what the science says, what it doesn't say is anything that your Marxist crazy comrades claim, world's not going to end in ten years and teenagers will make adulthood just fine. As Dr Tamsin told your leader, shut the fuck up with the Doomsday talk it ain't happening and there's no real scientific evidence that it ever will. And besides all this the UK is one of the smallest contributors of C02 and is taking there's down. The big four are USA China India and the EU and only one of them has reduced there c02 every year for the last 6 years. Can you guess who it is? That's right, it's Donald trump's America, nothing to do with trump of course and everything to do with technology and cheap fracked gas and that is why we should listen to experts in there fields and not middle class dipshit Marxist end of the world cultists. What's up with you cutie pie? Why are your knickers in such a twist? Suddenly a believer, but you don't want anybody to do anything? He's not my leader. In fact, they don't have a leader according to them. Everybody will survive ten or twenty years but it will get progressively more difficult. The point of Extinction Rebellion is speed the process with publicity. Calm discussion doesn't work. You are yammering about it now though China and India's economies are growing. Something we did years ago. We could try to keep them in poverty, but they don't seem keen on that. Regardless, they are very heavily investing in renewables. They've also signed up to the Paris Climate accord. We could all do nothing though. If you prefer Renewable energy is cheaper than fossil now. The economics will push in one direction anyway, particularly if Thorium salt reactors and more efficient storage methods come online. Faster is better though. Right or wrong?. You remind me of Micheal Jackson, he's black he's white!. Anyhow all of what you wrote is utter tits, never been a denier, never been against doing anything, renewable energy isn't cheaper than fossil fuel, calm discussion does work, India aren't doing shit. The only truth wrote on this thread is mine. Donald trump's USA have cut their emissions every year for 6 years unlike the EU's which has gone up every year. Ps calling me sweetie pie is just a giveaway to your real identity, Bobby boy I'm way ahead of you." The only truth is yours? Enough said ego-boy Pull the data out of your backside and put it on the screen otherwise have some quiet time. Are you claiming that I'm someone else? Are you struggling to believe that more than one person's calls you out for behaving the way that you do? Oh honey. You are very, very behind then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Communists always come in disguise, sometimes there white, other times there brown, sometimes there 70 and look like Santa. Either way nobodys fooled by your shit. Especially not me " Says the man the believes any horse shit he reads on the alt right websites you seem to get your rhubarb from. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable " I think you are right mate its called natural selection been going on since the birth of earth.There are plenty of extinctions but some are so arrogant they think that humans have the right not to.It will happen just a matter of time when and all these climate changers will not stop it but maybe delay it for a short while. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable " Do you think the uk should do more to lower it's population to help lower it's carbon footprint? Seems an ever increasing population in such a finite land mass is counter intuitive towards lowering emissions of climate damaging products. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable " The planets resources are finite. We now call the epoch we are in the Anthropecene .Its a period during which human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment. Usually such changes take millions of years .Rather than a century . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable I think you are right mate its called natural selection been going on since the birth of earth.There are plenty of extinctions but some are so arrogant they think that humans have the right not to.It will happen just a matter of time when and all these climate changers will not stop it but maybe delay it for a short while." Humans have the intelligence not to. We are choosing to though. External factors causes extinctions before. Not this time. We are also the first species in history to drive others to extinction. None of this is "natural" selection. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable I think you are right mate its called natural selection been going on since the birth of earth.There are plenty of extinctions but some are so arrogant they think that humans have the right not to.It will happen just a matter of time when and all these climate changers will not stop it but maybe delay it for a short while. Humans have the intelligence not to. We are choosing to though. External factors causes extinctions before. Not this time. We are also the first species in history to drive others to extinction. None of this is "natural" selection." Your going to twist our mutual friends melon by commenting at the same time as me bobby.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable I think you are right mate its called natural selection been going on since the birth of earth.There are plenty of extinctions but some are so arrogant they think that humans have the right not to.It will happen just a matter of time when and all these climate changers will not stop it but maybe delay it for a short while. Humans have the intelligence not to. We are choosing to though. External factors causes extinctions before. Not this time. We are also the first species in history to drive others to extinction. None of this is "natural" selection. Your going to twist our mutual friends melon by commenting at the same time as me bobby.. " Sorry Easy... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? " They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable Do you think the uk should do more to lower it's population to help lower it's carbon footprint? Seems an ever increasing population in such a finite land mass is counter intuitive towards lowering emissions of climate damaging products. " Even if the U.K. did that the rest of the world would just keep on going | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why not look into a way of making a more environmentally friendly Jet Engine ?" That's a great idea! I wonder why no one's doing that...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable Do you think the uk should do more to lower it's population to help lower it's carbon footprint? Seems an ever increasing population in such a finite land mass is counter intuitive towards lowering emissions of climate damaging products. Even if the U.K. did that the rest of the world would just keep on going " But why shouldn't the UK be a world leader on that? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable Do you think the uk should do more to lower it's population to help lower it's carbon footprint? Seems an ever increasing population in such a finite land mass is counter intuitive towards lowering emissions of climate damaging products. Even if the U.K. did that the rest of the world would just keep on going " Hans Rowling again on Climate change and population growth. Another great video from someone who understands the data and looks at it neutrally. Shame that he's no longer around. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/video/2013/may/17/population-climate-change-hans-rosling-video | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable Do you think the uk should do more to lower it's population to help lower it's carbon footprint? Seems an ever increasing population in such a finite land mass is counter intuitive towards lowering emissions of climate damaging products. Even if the U.K. did that the rest of the world would just keep on going But why shouldn't the UK be a world leader on that?" Someone has to get the bal rolling why not us. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things." That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do thnk that mankind has already gone too far with stripping the planet of it's natural rescources now and it has become self proppeling and we still keep having babies who will keep on demanding more and more until we eventually use everything that is usable Do you think the uk should do more to lower it's population to help lower it's carbon footprint? Seems an ever increasing population in such a finite land mass is counter intuitive towards lowering emissions of climate damaging products. Even if the U.K. did that the rest of the world would just keep on going But why shouldn't the UK be a world leader on that? Someone has to get the bal rolling why not us. " Exactly, the UK should pick a sustainable population figure, and stick with it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why not look into a way of making a more environmentally friendly Jet Engine ? That's a great idea! I wonder why no one's doing that......" Obviuosly your taking the piss but if they are ? Then why don’t governments divert more research and cash to it ? You never hear it mentioned ? Why don’t extinction rebellion raise money and awareness for it ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why not look into a way of making a more environmentally friendly Jet Engine ?" There is a huge amount of regulation driven work on this. The economics demand it anyway as lower fuel cost leads to more profit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why not look into a way of making a more environmentally friendly Jet Engine ? That's a great idea! I wonder why no one's doing that...... Obviuosly your taking the piss but if they are ? Then why don’t governments divert more research and cash to it ? You never hear it mentioned ? Why don’t extinction rebellion raise money and awareness for it ?" If Rolls Royce developed a break through engine they would become the world's leading aircraft engine supplier over night... I'm sure they're investing a fair bit of cash into it's development. The aviation industry is pushing for more and more efficiency. It's primarily the cause of the 2 accidents involving the 737MAX. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them." No, it shows something completely different. Well done trying to find something weirdly specific though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them. No, it shows something completely different. Well done trying to find something weirdly specific though " You must have been watching a different vid, as the one i was watching was showing how health care etc increased dramatically for oil producing countries from the 1960's on.. maybe im wrong, maybe the middle eastern states would have come out of the poverty without oil export. Maybe India's industrial revolution and subsequent improvements in health care and education wasn't fueled by cheap and easy access to coal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why not look into a way of making a more environmentally friendly Jet Engine ?" Better still stop the 1000’s of flights that take place everyday from moving people around who don’t really need to. It’s a fact that when they had to shut down the London airport the pollution actually dropped measurably in no time at all. Not saying it’s the answer to everything but it just shows how much things could change in no time at all. But so many people bang on about it but insist that it’s their right to jet off on holiday several tunes a year | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why not look into a way of making a more environmentally friendly Jet Engine ? Better still stop the 1000’s of flights that take place everyday from moving people around who don’t really need to. It’s a fact that when they had to shut down the London airport the pollution actually dropped measurably in no time at all. Not saying it’s the answer to everything but it just shows how much things could change in no time at all. But so many people bang on about it but insist that it’s their right to jet off on holiday several tunes a year " Hopefully Brexit, and the weak Pound will slow this down. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them. No, it shows something completely different. Well done trying to find something weirdly specific though You must have been watching a different vid, as the one i was watching was showing how health care etc increased dramatically for oil producing countries from the 1960's on.. maybe im wrong, maybe the middle eastern states would have come out of the poverty without oil export. Maybe India's industrial revolution and subsequent improvements in health care and education wasn't fueled by cheap and easy access to coal. " You chose to ignore how much non-oil states have also improved. Determined to do as little as possible and prove the futility of personal responsibility and action. You are beaten aren't you? Eager to infect everyone with it too. Oh well. Keep up the excellent work | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Clem, you are definitely one of the forms most lateral thinkers. I for one always appreciate your input " You may have noticed that Clem has a talent for knocking the wind out of many complacent thinkers on here so be careful what you wish for | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was the worlds temperature warmer thousand years ago .and not an aeroplane SUV. Etc etc to be seen " It took millions of years for the climate to gradually change. That allows adaptation of species on a global scale. We've just achieved the same thing in a couple of hundred. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was the worlds temperature warmer thousand years ago .and not an aeroplane SUV. Etc etc to be seen It took millions of years for the climate to gradually change. That allows adaptation of species on a global scale. We've just achieved the same thing in a couple of hundred." Not quiet as simple as you make it out the period between 1650 and 1850 was known as the minor ice age caused by a decrease in solar variability coupled with an increase in volcanic activity according to nasa so data from the last couple of hundred years do not show the true picture. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why was the worlds temperature warmer thousand years ago .and not an aeroplane SUV. Etc etc to be seen It took millions of years for the climate to gradually change. That allows adaptation of species on a global scale. We've just achieved the same thing in a couple of hundred.Not quiet as simple as you make it out the period between 1650 and 1850 was known as the minor ice age caused by a decrease in solar variability coupled with an increase in volcanic activity according to nasa so data from the last couple of hundred years do not show the true picture." You can't be taxed more for facts mate! Jump on the panic train and empty your pockets... sea levels are rising, obviously not here, but, you know, that other bit where water is higher. And temperatures are definitely rising, that's why there's no more skiing. Plus i heard a 20 year old lad down the pub say he couldn't EVER remember a time when autumn was so wet and windy, and so much property built on river floodplains had been affected by rising river levels. Clearly, we are doomed! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them. No, it shows something completely different. Well done trying to find something weirdly specific though You must have been watching a different vid, as the one i was watching was showing how health care etc increased dramatically for oil producing countries from the 1960's on.. maybe im wrong, maybe the middle eastern states would have come out of the poverty without oil export. Maybe India's industrial revolution and subsequent improvements in health care and education wasn't fueled by cheap and easy access to coal. You chose to ignore how much non-oil states have also improved. Determined to do as little as possible and prove the futility of personal responsibility and action. You are beaten aren't you? Eager to infect everyone with it too. Oh well. Keep up the excellent work " If you can't think of a counter point and can only resort to a personal attack, thats a sure sign you've lost the argument. Again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them. No, it shows something completely different. Well done trying to find something weirdly specific though You must have been watching a different vid, as the one i was watching was showing how health care etc increased dramatically for oil producing countries from the 1960's on.. maybe im wrong, maybe the middle eastern states would have come out of the poverty without oil export. Maybe India's industrial revolution and subsequent improvements in health care and education wasn't fueled by cheap and easy access to coal. You chose to ignore how much non-oil states have also improved. Determined to do as little as possible and prove the futility of personal responsibility and action. You are beaten aren't you? Eager to infect everyone with it too. Oh well. Keep up the excellent work If you can't think of a counter point and can only resort to a personal attack, thats a sure sign you've lost the argument. Again. " I gave you the counterpoint. Just post another YouTube clip from some random guy with no expertise in the subject who proves your point. It will be conclusive and at least marginally better than Man on Fire fails to do | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them. No, it shows something completely different. Well done trying to find something weirdly specific though You must have been watching a different vid, as the one i was watching was showing how health care etc increased dramatically for oil producing countries from the 1960's on.. maybe im wrong, maybe the middle eastern states would have come out of the poverty without oil export. Maybe India's industrial revolution and subsequent improvements in health care and education wasn't fueled by cheap and easy access to coal. You chose to ignore how much non-oil states have also improved. Determined to do as little as possible and prove the futility of personal responsibility and action. You are beaten aren't you? Eager to infect everyone with it too. Oh well. Keep up the excellent work If you can't think of a counter point and can only resort to a personal attack, thats a sure sign you've lost the argument. Again. I gave you the counterpoint. Just post another YouTube clip from some random guy with no expertise in the subject who proves your point. It will be conclusive and at least marginally better than Man on Fire fails to do " Meanwhile, we'll all wait for another of your invigorating threads where you copy and paste a something you found on the internet... how do you do it..? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As medical care in developing countries improves year on year, how will you educate them on lowering their birth rate as infant mortality rates continue to lower? They have been lowering year on year. Educating women in of itself reduces birthrates. Look up "Hans Rosling, The best stats you've ever seen" There's lots to be positive about if you don't continue to do dumb things. That certainly shows how developing countries who export fossil fuels experience a greater boost to their population's education, health care, etc with a lowering infant mortality rate as a result. I wonder what will happen to these states when the world no longer needs them? Maybe Yemen is the future for them. No, it shows something completely different. Well done trying to find something weirdly specific though You must have been watching a different vid, as the one i was watching was showing how health care etc increased dramatically for oil producing countries from the 1960's on.. maybe im wrong, maybe the middle eastern states would have come out of the poverty without oil export. Maybe India's industrial revolution and subsequent improvements in health care and education wasn't fueled by cheap and easy access to coal. You chose to ignore how much non-oil states have also improved. Determined to do as little as possible and prove the futility of personal responsibility and action. You are beaten aren't you? Eager to infect everyone with it too. Oh well. Keep up the excellent work If you can't think of a counter point and can only resort to a personal attack, thats a sure sign you've lost the argument. Again. I gave you the counterpoint. Just post another YouTube clip from some random guy with no expertise in the subject who proves your point. It will be conclusive and at least marginally better than Man on Fire fails to do Meanwhile, we'll all wait for another of your invigorating threads where you copy and paste a something you found on the internet... how do you do it..?" Of course, nothing's true unless you made it up yourself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liberals: Don't believe the media! It's right-wing lies! Also liberals: The media said something that made me feel worried and guilty, i should believe it! " Again, what's your actual point. Nothing is true and everything is true. The data doesn't matter. You arbitrate based on YouTube clips | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liberals: Don't believe the media! It's right-wing lies! Also liberals: The media said something that made me feel worried and guilty, i should believe it! " Not all people who understand science and the world around us are "liberals". There isn't really a correlation between understanding and analysing information and being liberal. Where do you get this stuff? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liberals: Don't believe the media! It's right-wing lies! Also liberals: The media said something that made me feel worried and guilty, i should believe it! Again, what's your actual point. Nothing is true and everything is true. The data doesn't matter. You arbitrate based on YouTube clips " Im not sure if you've noticed, but this thread is about XR. Not a debate on whether or not man made climate change is real or not. The very fact we're still debating that in the "politics" section already proves that it's not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liberals: Don't believe the media! It's right-wing lies! Also liberals: The media said something that made me feel worried and guilty, i should believe it! Again, what's your actual point. Nothing is true and everything is true. The data doesn't matter. You arbitrate based on YouTube clips Im not sure if you've noticed, but this thread is about XR. Not a debate on whether or not man made climate change is real or not. The very fact we're still debating that in the "politics" section already proves that it's not. " The fact that you're debating it doesn't prove or disprove anything. Climate change is being accelerated by human action. There is zero debate. You can choose to believe that the earth is flat, Man made climate change isn't real, water boils at 28 degrees. Your personal belief has no impact on reality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liberals: Don't believe the media! It's right-wing lies! Also liberals: The media said something that made me feel worried and guilty, i should believe it! Again, what's your actual point. Nothing is true and everything is true. The data doesn't matter. You arbitrate based on YouTube clips Im not sure if you've noticed, but this thread is about XR. Not a debate on whether or not man made climate change is real or not. The very fact we're still debating that in the "politics" section already proves that it's not. The fact that you're debating it doesn't prove or disprove anything. Climate change is being accelerated by human action. There is zero debate. You can choose to believe that the earth is flat, Man made climate change isn't real, water boils at 28 degrees. Your personal belief has no impact on reality. " Don't want to burst your bubble but water can boil at 28 degrees. All down to the pressure | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liberals: Don't believe the media! It's right-wing lies! Also liberals: The media said something that made me feel worried and guilty, i should believe it! Again, what's your actual point. Nothing is true and everything is true. The data doesn't matter. You arbitrate based on YouTube clips Im not sure if you've noticed, but this thread is about XR. Not a debate on whether or not man made climate change is real or not. The very fact we're still debating that in the "politics" section already proves that it's not. The fact that you're debating it doesn't prove or disprove anything. Climate change is being accelerated by human action. There is zero debate. You can choose to believe that the earth is flat, Man made climate change isn't real, water boils at 28 degrees. Your personal belief has no impact on reality. Don't want to burst your bubble but water can boil at 28 degrees. All down to the pressure " Okay! You got me. But I should say at standard sea level air pressure. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Have XR considered some kind of aid package for the middle east when we switch to 100% renewables? Same goes for India when we put the brakes on their industrial revolution. What's the best way for me to be taxed for that?" Your lack of understanding is staggering. I suggest reading up on the aims of the Paris climate accord. I'm sure someone has complied a very very high level basic overview that would help you here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is XR's plan to tackle the hole in the ozone layer? Or is that yesterday's news as we could fix that by using roll on deodorant? I mean, where's the tax/control in that!? They don't seem too worried about SF6 do they?" Again you're lack of understanding is monumental. I can only assume you're taking the piss now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liberals: Don't believe the media! It's right-wing lies! Also liberals: The media said something that made me feel worried and guilty, i should believe it! Again, what's your actual point. Nothing is true and everything is true. The data doesn't matter. You arbitrate based on YouTube clips Im not sure if you've noticed, but this thread is about XR. Not a debate on whether or not man made climate change is real or not. The very fact we're still debating that in the "politics" section already proves that it's not. " The location of a thread on a swingers website doesn't prove anything. Get a grip. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've often wondered, what's more palatable. Continued involvement with middle eastern religious conflict to look after the oil. Or find an alternative and let them go back to the stoneage ? " They’ll diversify into solar quicker than you can say allah Akbar! It’s already beginning . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've often wondered, what's more palatable. Continued involvement with middle eastern religious conflict to look after the oil. Or find an alternative and let them go back to the stoneage ? They’ll diversify into solar quicker than you can say allah Akbar! It’s already beginning . " Yep, just need a way of transporting it. Or some kind of miraculous cable. Maybe that's why China has invested so heavily in African infrastructure. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've often wondered, what's more palatable. Continued involvement with middle eastern religious conflict to look after the oil. Or find an alternative and let them go back to the stoneage ? They’ll diversify into solar quicker than you can say allah Akbar! It’s already beginning . Yep, just need a way of transporting it. Or some kind of miraculous cable. Maybe that's why China has invested so heavily in African infrastructure. " Here’s a magic cable... The Rio Madeira transmission link in Brazil, with an overhead length of 2,385km, is the world's longest power transmission line. The 600kV high-voltage direct current (HVDC) bipolar line was brought into commercial operation in November 2013 and is capable of transmitting 7.1GW of power. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've often wondered, what's more palatable. Continued involvement with middle eastern religious conflict to look after the oil. Or find an alternative and let them go back to the stoneage ? They’ll diversify into solar quicker than you can say allah Akbar! It’s already beginning . Yep, just need a way of transporting it. Or some kind of miraculous cable. Maybe that's why China has invested so heavily in African infrastructure. " There are alrwady two interconnections between Morocco and Spain. Are you implying that electricity transmission will somehow cost more or be more difficult to engineer than oil or gas pipelines? The Middle East is already diversifying into tourism and manufacturing. Both aluminium and transportation. Saudi is trying to sell of Aramco whilst it's still valuable. Now show me a YouTube clip | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've often wondered, what's more palatable. Continued involvement with middle eastern religious conflict to look after the oil. Or find an alternative and let them go back to the stoneage ? They’ll diversify into solar quicker than you can say allah Akbar! It’s already beginning . Yep, just need a way of transporting it. Or some kind of miraculous cable. Maybe that's why China has invested so heavily in African infrastructure. Here’s a magic cable... The Rio Madeira transmission link in Brazil, with an overhead length of 2,385km, is the world's longest power transmission line. The 600kV high-voltage direct current (HVDC) bipolar line was brought into commercial operation in November 2013 and is capable of transmitting 7.1GW of power." It does make me wonder why they're not covering the desert in solar panels now then, XR reckon humanity has about 5 - 8 years left. So surely it would make sense to future proof now? Why continue to kill the planet? Why are banks like Barclays investing in tar sand exploration, the use of which will kill us all, yet still sell 25 year mortgages? Debt that will never be paid off?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I've often wondered, what's more palatable. Continued involvement with middle eastern religious conflict to look after the oil. Or find an alternative and let them go back to the stoneage ? They’ll diversify into solar quicker than you can say allah Akbar! It’s already beginning . Yep, just need a way of transporting it. Or some kind of miraculous cable. Maybe that's why China has invested so heavily in African infrastructure. Here’s a magic cable... The Rio Madeira transmission link in Brazil, with an overhead length of 2,385km, is the world's longest power transmission line. The 600kV high-voltage direct current (HVDC) bipolar line was brought into commercial operation in November 2013 and is capable of transmitting 7.1GW of power. It does make me wonder why they're not covering the desert in solar panels now then, XR reckon humanity has about 5 - 8 years left. So surely it would make sense to future proof now? Why continue to kill the planet? Why are banks like Barclays investing in tar sand exploration, the use of which will kill us all, yet still sell 25 year mortgages? Debt that will never be paid off?!" Often if you don’t know the answer to a question he answer is often money. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"XR certainly do seem to be targeting the junkies rather than the dealers. " Classic one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |