FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Italy in Recession and Germany is Next
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Something that I find quite offensive is that most European countries have been great friends to the U.K. for a very, very long time. Yet we now have Brexiters stating that although it was manifestly our decision to leave we need to want EU countries to fall into recession and use their economic situation as a means to make our stupid decision work best for us. With friends like us, who needs enemies?" Or then again, maybe its a reaction to the remainers on here previously joyously shouting about how much better the EU countries were doing than the UK, and that this was manifest proof that voting for Brexit would drive the UK into recession... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy." You forgot to mention France, and it's Capital Paris which has been on fire with Protest against Macron every weekend for at least 2 months now. Macron is virtually in hiding from the yellow vests. The disruption there is also pushing France into recession. It was mentioned on the BBC This Week programme last night that Macron is so unpopular now in France his advisors have said the only way he could become more popular is if his wife was to suddenly die, so he could claim some sympathy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. You forgot to mention France, and it's Capital Paris which has been on fire with Protest against Macron every weekend for at least 2 months now. Macron is virtually in hiding from the yellow vests. The disruption there is also pushing France into recession. It was mentioned on the BBC This Week programme last night that Macron is so unpopular now in France his advisors have said the only way he could become more popular is if his wife was to suddenly die, so he could claim some sympathy. " You forgot to mention Spain: 2.8% growth over the last 12 months....you're welcome | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. You forgot to mention France, and it's Capital Paris which has been on fire with Protest against Macron every weekend for at least 2 months now. Macron is virtually in hiding from the yellow vests. The disruption there is also pushing France into recession. It was mentioned on the BBC This Week programme last night that Macron is so unpopular now in France his advisors have said the only way he could become more popular is if his wife was to suddenly die, so he could claim some sympathy. " You forgot to mention that Italy is being run by one of your anti-establishment coalitions. I guess the recession is someone else's fault. It couldn't be anything to do with their policies could it Centaur? Neither wants to leave the EU by the way, they just want want to take it over and run it in their own intolerant image. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. You forgot to mention France, and it's Capital Paris which has been on fire with Protest against Macron every weekend for at least 2 months now. Macron is virtually in hiding from the yellow vests. The disruption there is also pushing France into recession. It was mentioned on the BBC This Week programme last night that Macron is so unpopular now in France his advisors have said the only way he could become more popular is if his wife was to suddenly die, so he could claim some sympathy. You forgot to mention Spain: 2.8% growth over the last 12 months....you're welcome" You forgot to mention the 14.45% unemployment rate . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unless every country in the world uses the same criteria for classing people as unemployed, comparing relative figures is misleading." Not misleading when you spend alot of time with them in fact Andalusia where spend a lot of time the unemployment rate is over 21% dont matter how you count them they are still out of work.They are worried about brexit as 20% of the tourists are from the uk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unless every country in the world uses the same criteria for classing people as unemployed, comparing relative figures is misleading.Not misleading when you spend alot of time with them in fact Andalusia where spend a lot of time the unemployment rate is over 21% dont matter how you count them they are still out of work.They are worried about brexit as 20% of the tourists are from the uk. " That’s their unemployment figures based on their criteria. Our unemployment figures are based on our criteria. Unless both criteria are the same the unemployment rates can’t be compared. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why Are We Pleased With Others' Misfortune? From Psychology Today: It is not enough to succeed; others must fail. (Gore Vidal) Malice is like a game of poker or tennis; you don't play it with anyone who is manifestly inferior to you. (Hilde Spiel) The emotion of pleasure-in-others'-misfortune (Schadenfreude in German) is generally regarded as morally evil. It is often considered to be less acceptable than envy, which is regarded as a deadly sin. It would appear to be morally more perverse to be pleased with another person's misfortune than to be displeased with another person's good fortune. Indeed Arthur Schopenhauer argues that to feel envy is human, but to enjoy other people's misfortune is diabolical. For Schopenhauer, pleasure-in-others'-misfortune is the worst trait in human nature since it is closely related to cruelty. I believe that once we understand better this emotion, it becomes more natural and acceptable. " This.. I totally get that the majority who voted leave did so on a sincere belief and a wish that we will in doing so prosper.. I fail to see the logic with those who delight in the possible misfortune of others, who relish the possibility that the EU will fail.. Regardless of the knock on effect of such a thing, there's something of a sickness in the taking pleasure of that.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This.. I totally get that the majority who voted leave did so on a sincere belief and a wish that we will in doing so prosper.. I fail to see the logic with those who delight in the possible misfortune of others, who relish the possibility that the EU will fail.. Regardless of the knock on effect of such a thing, there's something of a sickness in the taking pleasure of that.. " The word that leapt out at me was "cruelty". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why Are We Pleased With Others' Misfortune? From Psychology Today: It is not enough to succeed; others must fail. (Gore Vidal) Malice is like a game of poker or tennis; you don't play it with anyone who is manifestly inferior to you. (Hilde Spiel) The emotion of pleasure-in-others'-misfortune (Schadenfreude in German) is generally regarded as morally evil. It is often considered to be less acceptable than envy, which is regarded as a deadly sin. It would appear to be morally more perverse to be pleased with another person's misfortune than to be displeased with another person's good fortune. Indeed Arthur Schopenhauer argues that to feel envy is human, but to enjoy other people's misfortune is diabolical. For Schopenhauer, pleasure-in-others'-misfortune is the worst trait in human nature since it is closely related to cruelty. I believe that once we understand better this emotion, it becomes more natural and acceptable. This.. I totally get that the majority who voted leave did so on a sincere belief and a wish that we will in doing so prosper.. I fail to see the logic with those who delight in the possible misfortune of others, who relish the possibility that the EU will fail.. Regardless of the knock on effect of such a thing, there's something of a sickness in the taking pleasure of that.. " I dont think the majority of leavers want to see the eu fail but you will always get extremists in any walk of life. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unless every country in the world uses the same criteria for classing people as unemployed, comparing relative figures is misleading." EU members have to measure unemployment and employment in the same way as each other...it's covered under EU directive 577/98. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unless every country in the world uses the same criteria for classing people as unemployed, comparing relative figures is misleading.Not misleading when you spend alot of time with them in fact Andalusia where spend a lot of time the unemployment rate is over 21% dont matter how you count them they are still out of work.They are worried about brexit as 20% of the tourists are from the uk. That’s their unemployment figures based on their criteria. Our unemployment figures are based on our criteria. Unless both criteria are the same the unemployment rates can’t be compared." EU directive 577/98 stipulates hkw EU member countries have to measure employment and unemployment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unless every country in the world uses the same criteria for classing people as unemployed, comparing relative figures is misleading.Not misleading when you spend alot of time with them in fact Andalusia where spend a lot of time the unemployment rate is over 21% dont matter how you count them they are still out of work.They are worried about brexit as 20% of the tourists are from the uk. That’s their unemployment figures based on their criteria. Our unemployment figures are based on our criteria. Unless both criteria are the same the unemployment rates can’t be compared. EU directive 577/98 stipulates hkw EU member countries have to measure employment and unemployment." Really so Spain forces school leavers without a job into further education thus keeping them off the unemployment figures. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy." Very true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"'Enjoy' Nothing to enjoy about others' misfortunes, as Sara and others here have posted. I find that distasteful and lacking in respect for every person that's potentially closer to becoming destitute, homeless etc. It would still not be a reason to justify leaving the EU, especially when the UK isn't currently swamped with trade deals that will be a shadow of what the UK in the EU has delivered for everyone. I sometimes sense that many see the EU as 'them', rather than 'us'. The EU being what we have helped to succesfully establish and enable, as well as gain enormous benefit from. " Donald Tusk said the same thing the other week and rightly or wrongly most Brits do see them as them.I see us as Brits the French as French,the Germans as Germans etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. You forgot to mention France, and it's Capital Paris which has been on fire with Protest against Macron every weekend for at least 2 months now. Macron is virtually in hiding from the yellow vests. The disruption there is also pushing France into recession. It was mentioned on the BBC This Week programme last night that Macron is so unpopular now in France his advisors have said the only way he could become more popular is if his wife was to suddenly die, so he could claim some sympathy. You forgot to mention Spain: 2.8% growth over the last 12 months....you're welcomeYou forgot to mention the 14.45% unemployment rate ." It wasn't relevant to a thread which was celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"'Enjoy' Nothing to enjoy about others' misfortunes, as Sara and others here have posted. I find that distasteful and lacking in respect for every person that's potentially closer to becoming destitute, homeless etc. It would still not be a reason to justify leaving the EU, especially when the UK isn't currently swamped with trade deals that will be a shadow of what the UK in the EU has delivered for everyone. I sometimes sense that many see the EU as 'them', rather than 'us'. The EU being what we have helped to succesfully establish and enable, as well as gain enormous benefit from. Donald Tusk said the same thing the other week and rightly or wrongly most Brits do see them as them.I see us as Brits the French as French,the Germans as Germans etc" Oddly most Brextremists seem to think of themselves as English and conveniently forget the other constituent parts of the Union | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unless every country in the world uses the same criteria for classing people as unemployed, comparing relative figures is misleading.Not misleading when you spend alot of time with them in fact Andalusia where spend a lot of time the unemployment rate is over 21% dont matter how you count them they are still out of work.They are worried about brexit as 20% of the tourists are from the uk. That’s their unemployment figures based on their criteria. Our unemployment figures are based on our criteria. Unless both criteria are the same the unemployment rates can’t be compared. EU directive 577/98 stipulates hkw EU member countries have to measure employment and unemployment. Really so Spain forces school leavers without a job into further education thus keeping them off the unemployment figures. " This is what you said.... "That’s their (Spain's) unemployment figures based on their criteria. Our unemployment figures are based on our criteria. Unless both criteria are the same the unemployment rates can’t be compared." The criteria on the measurement of employment and unemployment is the same across the EU...as per EU directive 577/98. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unless every country in the world uses the same criteria for classing people as unemployed, comparing relative figures is misleading.Not misleading when you spend alot of time with them in fact Andalusia where spend a lot of time the unemployment rate is over 21% dont matter how you count them they are still out of work.They are worried about brexit as 20% of the tourists are from the uk. That’s their unemployment figures based on their criteria. Our unemployment figures are based on our criteria. Unless both criteria are the same the unemployment rates can’t be compared. EU directive 577/98 stipulates hkw EU member countries have to measure employment and unemployment. Really so Spain forces school leavers without a job into further education thus keeping them off the unemployment figures. This is what you said.... "That’s their (Spain's) unemployment figures based on their criteria. Our unemployment figures are based on our criteria. Unless both criteria are the same the unemployment rates can’t be compared." The criteria on the measurement of employment and unemployment is the same across the EU...as per EU directive 577/98. " The measurement is the same (ish....the ages vary between countries actually 15 to 74 year olds in some countries, 16-74 in others). However, people have to be available to work. A 17 year in school or college compulsorily in the UK isnt available to work. Therefore, the point about schemes which keep people of the register mean that they wont be counted in any data trawl has some validity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU." Sort of sums brexit and its acolytes up. The question is can we find a similar attitude in another time and place in modern history so that we can compare the outcome? How about Fascist Italy under Mussolini in the 1930's, maybe Nazi Germany or imperialist Japan at the same time. None are a perfect fit as they all were ruled by dictatorships. But when you look at the actions of our present government and the acknowledged planning for the use of emergency powers and military to maintain order post brexit is our government much different? Anyone want to remind me how things worked out for the 3 countries mentioned above? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU. " This thread is just about evidence FOR the implosion if the EU. Please put any balancing evidence in another thread... And remainers get told they live in an echo chamber ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu" Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU. This thread is just about evidence FOR the implosion if the EU. Please put any balancing evidence in another thread... And remainers get told they live in an echo chamber !" . I think there was an article in the guardian from 30 influential writers declaring they're witnessing the EU implosion due to popularist uprisings... Which thread should I put it in? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU. This thread is just about evidence FOR the implosion if the EU. Please put any balancing evidence in another thread... And remainers get told they live in an echo chamber !. I think there was an article in the guardian from 30 influential writers declaring they're witnessing the EU implosion due to popularist uprisings... Which thread should I put it in? " Even one of the EU's greatest cheer leaders George Soros has now admitted the EU doesn't have a future and will collapse. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy?" The average salary of 310,000 ISK per month (approximately 2900 USD) puts Iceland’s figures among the highest salaries in Europe. Even if the cost of living in the country is high, the purchase power still makes of Iceland an attractive place to be an employee. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy? The average salary of 310,000 ISK per month (approximately 2900 USD) puts Iceland’s figures among the highest salaries in Europe. Even if the cost of living in the country is high, the purchase power still makes of Iceland an attractive place to be an employee." Except there is nothing there and they need an app to check that they aren't fucking too close a relative. It's a way of living. A tiny country and tiny population. Not a model for the UK. They also held their bankers to account. We could have done. We did not. As a sovereign state. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU. This thread is just about evidence FOR the implosion if the EU. Please put any balancing evidence in another thread... And remainers get told they live in an echo chamber !. I think there was an article in the guardian from 30 influential writers declaring they're witnessing the EU implosion due to popularist uprisings... Which thread should I put it in? Even one of the EU's greatest cheer leaders George Soros has now admitted the EU doesn't have a future and will collapse. " No. Once again seeing what you want to see. He said it was at a point where it could collapse. He's witnessed how dictatorship works first hand. He sees it again in his homeland. It's not just the collapse of the EU. It's the surrender of freedom for illusory "strength" and "certainty" with all ills blamed on outsiders. It is being cheered on. When it is established and the reality is apparent it is too late because the systems and organisations pit into place over hundreds of years to protect us will be voted away so that we can "get things done". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU. This thread is just about evidence FOR the implosion if the EU. Please put any balancing evidence in another thread... And remainers get told they live in an echo chamber !. I think there was an article in the guardian from 30 influential writers declaring they're witnessing the EU implosion due to popularist uprisings... Which thread should I put it in? Even one of the EU's greatest cheer leaders George Soros has now admitted the EU doesn't have a future and will collapse. No. Once again seeing what you want to see. He said it was at a point where it could collapse. He's witnessed how dictatorship works first hand. He sees it again in his homeland. It's not just the collapse of the EU. It's the surrender of freedom for illusory "strength" and "certainty" with all ills blamed on outsiders. It is being cheered on. When it is established and the reality is apparent it is too late because the systems and organisations pit into place over hundreds of years to protect us will be voted away so that we can "get things done"." Hundreds of years? The EU only came about in the 1950's/60's. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" celebrating the recession in Italy and the impending implosion of the EU. This thread is just about evidence FOR the implosion if the EU. Please put any balancing evidence in another thread... And remainers get told they live in an echo chamber !. I think there was an article in the guardian from 30 influential writers declaring they're witnessing the EU implosion due to popularist uprisings... Which thread should I put it in? Even one of the EU's greatest cheer leaders George Soros has now admitted the EU doesn't have a future and will collapse. No. Once again seeing what you want to see. He said it was at a point where it could collapse. He's witnessed how dictatorship works first hand. He sees it again in his homeland. It's not just the collapse of the EU. It's the surrender of freedom for illusory "strength" and "certainty" with all ills blamed on outsiders. It is being cheered on. When it is established and the reality is apparent it is too late because the systems and organisations pit into place over hundreds of years to protect us will be voted away so that we can "get things done". Hundreds of years? The EU only came about in the 1950's/60's. " Reading comprehension not your thing? I'm not just talking about the EU. The clue is in the phrase "It's not just the collapse of the EU." Countries have been around for hundreds of years. Right? Choosing to talk about a detail rather than the pertinent points again? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu" After the icelandic bank crisis, they were basically bailed out on the back of IMF loans and Russian money.... lots of UK investors lost a lot of money in the icelandic banking crisis as their government refused to underwrite any foreign money invested in their banks...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote " So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy? The average salary of 310,000 ISK per month (approximately 2900 USD) puts Iceland’s figures among the highest salaries in Europe. Even if the cost of living in the country is high, the purchase power still makes of Iceland an attractive place to be an employee. Except there is nothing there and they need an app to check that they aren't fucking too close a relative. It's a way of living. A tiny country and tiny population. Not a model for the UK. They also held their bankers to account. We could have done. We did not. As a sovereign state." . Haha an app for checking whether your fucking relatives?. I've not heard about any genetic abnormalities in Icelanders or the app but enlighten me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy? The average salary of 310,000 ISK per month (approximately 2900 USD) puts Iceland’s figures among the highest salaries in Europe. Even if the cost of living in the country is high, the purchase power still makes of Iceland an attractive place to be an employee. Except there is nothing there and they need an app to check that they aren't fucking too close a relative. It's a way of living. A tiny country and tiny population. Not a model for the UK. They also held their bankers to account. We could have done. We did not. As a sovereign state.. Haha an app for checking whether your fucking relatives?. I've not heard about any genetic abnormalities in Icelanders or the app but enlighten me." please say is called Kindr. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy? The average salary of 310,000 ISK per month (approximately 2900 USD) puts Iceland’s figures among the highest salaries in Europe. Even if the cost of living in the country is high, the purchase power still makes of Iceland an attractive place to be an employee. Except there is nothing there and they need an app to check that they aren't fucking too close a relative. It's a way of living. A tiny country and tiny population. Not a model for the UK. They also held their bankers to account. We could have done. We did not. As a sovereign state.. Haha an app for checking whether your fucking relatives?. I've not heard about any genetic abnormalities in Icelanders or the app but enlighten me." Apparently Fujitsu have been working on an app for the last 2 years that can solve the irish border problem. Fujitsu say it'll be ready to test before March 29th. Yes it's that technology remainers keep insisting doesn't exist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy? The average salary of 310,000 ISK per month (approximately 2900 USD) puts Iceland’s figures among the highest salaries in Europe. Even if the cost of living in the country is high, the purchase power still makes of Iceland an attractive place to be an employee. Except there is nothing there and they need an app to check that they aren't fucking too close a relative. It's a way of living. A tiny country and tiny population. Not a model for the UK. They also held their bankers to account. We could have done. We did not. As a sovereign state.. Haha an app for checking whether your fucking relatives?. I've not heard about any genetic abnormalities in Icelanders or the app but enlighten me.please say is called Kindr. " . Oh you are awful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Still look on the bright side Iceland doing very well outside the eu Have you seen the tax rates in Iceland? 37% basic rate and a VAT rate of 24% as well as punitive Duty taxes on alcohol of up to 85% of the cost. How does that fit in with the “low tax” Singapore in Europe fantasy? The average salary of 310,000 ISK per month (approximately 2900 USD) puts Iceland’s figures among the highest salaries in Europe. Even if the cost of living in the country is high, the purchase power still makes of Iceland an attractive place to be an employee. Except there is nothing there and they need an app to check that they aren't fucking too close a relative. It's a way of living. A tiny country and tiny population. Not a model for the UK. They also held their bankers to account. We could have done. We did not. As a sovereign state.. Haha an app for checking whether your fucking relatives?. I've not heard about any genetic abnormalities in Icelanders or the app but enlighten me. Apparently Fujitsu have been working on an app for the last 2 years that can solve the irish border problem. Fujitsu say it'll be ready to test before March 29th. Yes it's that technology remainers keep insisting doesn't exist. " If you want to read about it just Google 'Fujitsu Irish border app'. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. " You didn’t read the bit about your hard no deal brexit sending the uk into negative economic growth did you?.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Apparently Fujitsu have been working on an app for the last 2 years that can solve the irish border problem. Fujitsu say it'll be ready to test before March 29th. Yes it's that technology remainers keep insisting doesn't exist. " The point is that if you propose a technology to solve the border issue, it needs to be ready now, already tested and proven. 'ready to test before March 29th' tells us nothing. It could be years before it's actually ready to implement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Apparently Fujitsu have been working on an app for the last 2 years that can solve the irish border problem. Fujitsu say it'll be ready to test before March 29th. Yes it's that technology remainers keep insisting doesn't exist. The point is that if you propose a technology to solve the border issue, it needs to be ready now, already tested and proven. 'ready to test before March 29th' tells us nothing. It could be years before it's actually ready to implement. " Then again if the test goes according to plan it could be ready to be rolled out before or on 29th March. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Apparently Fujitsu have been working on an app for the last 2 years that can solve the irish border problem. Fujitsu say it'll be ready to test before March 29th. Yes it's that technology remainers keep insisting doesn't exist. The point is that if you propose a technology to solve the border issue, it needs to be ready now, already tested and proven. 'ready to test before March 29th' tells us nothing. It could be years before it's actually ready to implement. Then again if the test goes according to plan it could be ready to be rolled out before or on 29th March. " Not if it goes the way of how most IT testing goes !! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. You didn’t read the bit about your hard no deal brexit sending the uk into negative economic growth did you?.... " They seem to have a confidence range of +\- 1.5% which makes any prediction a bit worthless ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If it works for the border in Ireland, it should work equally well at all other entry points to the UK. We can scrap the Border Force - made redundant by technology." It's not needed at all other entry points into the UK though as all other entry points Into the UK are not subject to the good Friday agreement. The good Friday agreement is only relevant to the irish border. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see France and Italy are at each others throats now so much for European harmony." So lame..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see France and Italy are at each others throats now so much for European harmony. So lame..... " . So limp | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I see France and Italy are at each others throats now so much for European harmony." I imagine if Donald Trump invited Tommy Robinson to the White House, there might be a bit of reaction on this side of the Atlantic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy." "The Bank of England expects growth this year to be the slowest since 2009 when the economy was in recession". Todays latest financial news . Looks like Britain will be in Recession before Germany . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. "The Bank of England expects growth this year to be the slowest since 2009 when the economy was in recession". Todays latest financial news . Looks like Britain will be in Recession before Germany ." Brexiters only see the problems of other European countries and in their own country do not see anything, oh sorry, all this is the fault of immigrants from Central and Eastern Europe, it is normal for them. Normal for nationalists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. "The Bank of England expects growth this year to be the slowest since 2009 when the economy was in recession". Todays latest financial news . Looks like Britain will be in Recession before Germany ." They also predict a recession by the end of the year / early next year....whilst at tge same time saying unemployment will continue to drop, employment will continue to rise, and wages will increase by 3% per annum.....a recession like no recession ever.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. " Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. "The Bank of England expects growth this year to be the slowest since 2009 when the economy was in recession". Todays latest financial news . Looks like Britain will be in Recession before Germany . They also predict a recession by the end of the year / early next year....whilst at tge same time saying unemployment will continue to drop, employment will continue to rise, and wages will increase by 3% per annum.....a recession like no recession ever.... " Just for the record, "employed" includes one hours work a week: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46264291 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time." The new anti EU coalition government in Italy put forward a new budget plan when they came to office which the EU promptly rejected. The EU insisted it was changed so the EU have to take responsibility for that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. "The Bank of England expects growth this year to be the slowest since 2009 when the economy was in recession". Todays latest financial news . Looks like Britain will be in Recession before Germany . They also predict a recession by the end of the year / early next year....whilst at tge same time saying unemployment will continue to drop, employment will continue to rise, and wages will increase by 3% per annum.....a recession like no recession ever.... Just for the record, "employed" includes one hours work a week: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46264291" Just for the record, "recession" means more people doing no work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just for the record, "recession" means more people doing no work." actually..... and i hate to be the bearer of bad news for your pithy response... but it actually doesn't..... the technical term "recession" means being in negative economic growth for 2 or more consecutive quarters in row..... which is why the BoE used that specific language about the UK heading for "negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through........... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just for the record, "recession" means more people doing no work. actually..... and i hate to be the bearer of bad news for your pithy response... but it actually doesn't..... the technical term "recession" means being in negative economic growth for 2 or more consecutive quarters in row..... which is why the BoE used that specific language about the UK heading for "negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through..........." Did you watch BBC Question Time last night Fabio? A guest on the panel said Mark Carney has only got 2 out of his last 12 economic forecasts correct, so he doesn't exactly have a good track record does he. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just for the record, "recession" means more people doing no work. actually..... and i hate to be the bearer of bad news for your pithy response... but it actually doesn't..... the technical term "recession" means being in negative economic growth for 2 or more consecutive quarters in row..... which is why the BoE used that specific language about the UK heading for "negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through..........." What's happened to the "deep and profound recession", with "800,000 more unemployed" when we leave? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just for the record, "recession" means more people doing no work." Really, lol, WTF!!! OK, it's your Meds time me thinks... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just for the record, "recession" means more people doing no work. Really, lol, WTF!!! OK, it's your Meds time me thinks... " When was the last time a recession in the UK meant more people in work, fewer unemployed, and wage rises above inflation? And where's the 'deep and profound recession' and '800,000 extra unemployed' that was forecast if we voted leave? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just for the record, "recession" means more people doing no work. Really, lol, WTF!!! OK, it's your Meds time me thinks... When was the last time a recession in the UK meant more people in work, fewer unemployed, and wage rises above inflation? And where's the 'deep and profound recession' and '800,000 extra unemployed' that was forecast if we voted leave?" I suspect you meant “job losses tend to be associated with recessions” rather than they are the definition of a recession. I’m afraid fab has become a stickler for pedantry atm. It’s eaiser to claim victories that way ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If we left Not if we voted leave . Dont forget the Bank of England still has the £300 billion set aside for quantitative easing so recession & banks are under far less pressure for the time being." No the exact terminology people like George Osborne used in the referendum campaign was 'if we vote to leave' or 'following a vote to leave'. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If we left Not if we voted leave . Dont forget the Bank of England still has the £300 billion set aside for quantitative easing so recession & banks are under far less pressure for the time being. No the exact terminology people like George Osborne used in the referendum campaign was 'if we vote to leave' or 'following a vote to leave'. " Funny you can quote what Osborne said, but can you quote the wording on the referendum ballot? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If we left Not if we voted leave . Dont forget the Bank of England still has the £300 billion set aside for quantitative easing so recession & banks are under far less pressure for the time being. No the exact terminology people like George Osborne used in the referendum campaign was 'if we vote to leave' or 'following a vote to leave'. Funny you can quote what Osborne said, but can you quote the wording on the referendum ballot?" Yup | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If we left Not if we voted leave . Dont forget the Bank of England still has the £300 billion set aside for quantitative easing so recession & banks are under far less pressure for the time being. No the exact terminology people like George Osborne used in the referendum campaign was 'if we vote to leave' or 'following a vote to leave'. Funny you can quote what Osborne said, but can you quote the wording on the referendum ballot?" Just in case you didnt know this how Parliament can deal with Referendums . "Referendums in the United Kingdom are occasionally held at a national, regional or local level. National referendums can be permitted by an Act of Parliament and regulated through the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000, but they are by tradition extremely rare due to the principle of parliamentary sovereigntymeaning that they cannot be constitutionally binding on either the Government or Parliament, although they usually have a persuasive political effect". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time. The new anti EU coalition government in Italy put forward a new budget plan when they came to office which the EU promptly rejected. The EU insisted it was changed so the EU have to take responsibility for that. " It would have increased the already enormous budget deficit. It would have broken the terms under which the Euro functions. Rules shouldn't be observed in your world Centaur? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time. The new anti EU coalition government in Italy put forward a new budget plan when they came to office which the EU promptly rejected. The EU insisted it was changed so the EU have to take responsibility for that. It would have increased the already enormous budget deficit. It would have broken the terms under which the Euro functions. Rules shouldn't be observed in your world Centaur?" It could have taken Italy out of recession though. Now we will never know because the EU refused it and made Italy change it, the EU then has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time. The new anti EU coalition government in Italy put forward a new budget plan when they came to office which the EU promptly rejected. The EU insisted it was changed so the EU have to take responsibility for that. It would have increased the already enormous budget deficit. It would have broken the terms under which the Euro functions. Rules shouldn't be observed in your world Centaur? It could have taken Italy out of recession though. Now we will never know because the EU refused it and made Italy change it, the EU then has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. " Centaur the economist Based on what logic? Step through it for me. Italy shouldn't take responsibility for the economic situation that it is in knowing the rules that exist? Blame someone else You've never accepted that any country is responsible for any situation that it is in do you? It's always someone else's fault. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time. The new anti EU coalition government in Italy put forward a new budget plan when they came to office which the EU promptly rejected. The EU insisted it was changed so the EU have to take responsibility for that. It would have increased the already enormous budget deficit. It would have broken the terms under which the Euro functions. Rules shouldn't be observed in your world Centaur? It could have taken Italy out of recession though. Now we will never know because the EU refused it and made Italy change it, the EU then has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. Centaur the economist Based on what logic? Step through it for me. Italy shouldn't take responsibility for the economic situation that it is in knowing the rules that exist? Blame someone else You've never accepted that any country is responsible for any situation that it is in do you? It's always someone else's fault." No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time. The new anti EU coalition government in Italy put forward a new budget plan when they came to office which the EU promptly rejected. The EU insisted it was changed so the EU have to take responsibility for that. It would have increased the already enormous budget deficit. It would have broken the terms under which the Euro functions. Rules shouldn't be observed in your world Centaur? It could have taken Italy out of recession though. Now we will never know because the EU refused it and made Italy change it, the EU then has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. Centaur the economist Based on what logic? Step through it for me. Italy shouldn't take responsibility for the economic situation that it is in knowing the rules that exist? Blame someone else You've never accepted that any country is responsible for any situation that it is in do you? It's always someone else's fault. No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. " How did Italy get to where it is? I'm sure that the EU take their responsibilities very seriously. What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? Any idea? Thought that through at all? The Italian budget was to keep pigate election promises, not to prevent a recession. However, I'm always happy to encourage you to explain economic policies. What are the prod and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. Again, Italy run by an anti-establishment, right wing coalition whom you are very complimentary of, yet they have taken their country into recession in double quick time. The new anti EU coalition government in Italy put forward a new budget plan when they came to office which the EU promptly rejected. The EU insisted it was changed so the EU have to take responsibility for that. It would have increased the already enormous budget deficit. It would have broken the terms under which the Euro functions. Rules shouldn't be observed in your world Centaur? It could have taken Italy out of recession though. Now we will never know because the EU refused it and made Italy change it, the EU then has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. Centaur the economist Based on what logic? Step through it for me. Italy shouldn't take responsibility for the economic situation that it is in knowing the rules that exist? Blame someone else You've never accepted that any country is responsible for any situation that it is in do you? It's always someone else's fault. No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. " So Centy you've always banged on about the EU cooking the books letting / bending their own rules regarding states budget/economy/debt conformity to join the bloc as in the Greek hidden disaster while now you're against the EU very publicly demanding states conform to the budget rules in the Italian issue.... Which are you for or against because you don't seem as ever to be able to make your mind up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. " So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. " Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. " I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So Centy you've always banged on about the EU cooking the books letting / bending their own rules regarding states budget/economy/debt conformity to join the bloc as in the Greek hidden disaster while now you're against the EU very publicly demanding states conform to the budget rules in the Italian issue.... Which are you for or against because you don't seem as ever to be able to make your mind up " So we'll come back to this again. Like many topics you often post on one side of an argument to slag the EU off over then days or weeks later you post agreeing on the total opposite side of the argument to slag the EU off.... You can't even agree with yourself on here Do you not realise how strange that makes you look to people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. " You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. " Shall we see if you can back up what you say? Let's try this again if you want an economic argument. If you can answer then you could convince us all. If not we know it's just the Daily Express again What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The Italian budget was to keep election promises before a threat of a recession. Do you disagree? What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. Shall we see if you can back up what you say? Let's try this again if you want an economic argument. If you can answer then you could convince us all. If not we know it's just the Daily Express again What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The Italian budget was to keep election promises before a threat of a recession. Do you disagree? What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB?" Oh here we go, Mr 20 questions again. It seems I'm not the only one who notices you always do this when someone makes a point you don't like, as sponge and JimiUk had also brought it up on other threads. I think JimiUK said when you asked him 20 questions that all of your questions are easily Googled. This tactic of yours asking multiple questions of people who you disagree with just makes you look incredibly lazy (possibly incredibly dumb too). Anyway having said that I'll indulge you. 1. What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The truth is we don't know because Italy weren't allowed to do it. As I already pointed out in an earlier comment it Could have turned out great and Italy could have had high growth and avoided recession or it could have gone badly and Italy hit recession. We'll never know. What we do know is the EU rejected it, and insisted Italy change it, the EU's input has now lead to Italy going into recession. 2. The Italian budget was to keep election promises before the threat of a recession. Do I disagree? In response to this firstly you seem to be forgetting that no 1 party won outright in the Italian election. The new Italian government is a coalition of 2 parties and so no one party can fully implement it's manifesto or keep all of its election promises. There was a compromise between the 2 parties on what they were going to do after forming a coalition partnership following the election result. 3. What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? Again it would have depended on the economic results of said spending plan, which we will now never know because the EU rejected it. I refer you to the answer to question 1. If the spending plan had been allowed and had been a success then Italy would have been experiencing growth now and would have used money from that growth to pay back the budget deficit to the EU. If it had gone badly Italy would have been in recession, but as the EU rejected the plan the EU's input has still lead to Italy being in recession now anyway. 4. What economic argument makes me come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Well considering respected independent economists like Steve Keen and Yanis Varoufarkis have called the ECB a bunch of idiots who haven't got a clue what they're doing coupled with previous very poor decisions that have turned out to be a disaster for the EU and the Eurozone then I'm not inclined to have much faith in the abilities of the ECB. The new coalition government in Italy is an unknown factor as they had never been in power before and had no track record to compare previous performance against so I'd be willing to give them a shot at it, rather than the ECB and the EU who's previous track record is littered with one disaster after another. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. " So I guess you've done a u-turn now believing the EU now should not enforce membership rules because you're always saying they turn a blind eye to member states flouting the rules when joining. Which is it lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Speaking of the usual patterns people seem to fall into on the forums you've got a handful of threads debunking your BS to reply to their buddy or are you just gonna keep running away from logic for rhetoric and BS? " No I haven't and not getting into it again with you on this thread as it's already been done to death on another thread which you derailed with this nonsense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. So I guess you've done a u-turn now believing the EU now should not enforce membership rules because you're always saying they turn a blind eye to member states flouting the rules when joining. Which is it lol " Isn't it remainers like EasyUK who have done a u-turn here . He's always claiming member states in the EU are independent sovereign countries, and yet now he seems to be admitting Italy isn't sovereign and can't control it's own budget and doesn't have the final say over its own budget. It's about sovereignty isn't it. Is Italy a sovereign independent country in the EU or is the EU now controlling the finances of Italy and controlling Italy's budget? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. So I guess you've done a u-turn now believing the EU now should not enforce membership rules because you're always saying they turn a blind eye to member states flouting the rules when joining. Which is it lol Isn't it remainers like EasyUK who have done a u-turn here . He's always claiming member states in the EU are independent sovereign countries, and yet now he seems to be admitting Italy isn't sovereign and can't control it's own budget and doesn't have the final say over its own budget. It's about sovereignty isn't it. Is Italy a sovereign independent country in the EU or is the EU now controlling the finances of Italy and controlling Italy's budget? " If you can't agree even with yourself then there's no point in any debate with another person. Roll on Brexit | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here." Do you have a view why this is? I get the impression given the exposure to manufacturing, brexit plus trade wars are having a larger effect than in the Uk and given Germans are more prudent, there’s less internal stimulus tha here in the UK where our saving ratio on is (I think) lower and personal debt (is I think) higher. So even tho germany still has good wage growth it isn’t stimulating the market in the same way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. Shall we see if you can back up what you say? Let's try this again if you want an economic argument. If you can answer then you could convince us all. If not we know it's just the Daily Express again What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The Italian budget was to keep election promises before a threat of a recession. Do you disagree? What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Oh here we go, Mr 20 questions again. It seems I'm not the only one who notices you always do this when someone makes a point you don't like, as sponge and JimiUk had also brought it up on other threads. I think JimiUK said when you asked him 20 questions that all of your questions are easily Googled. This tactic of yours asking multiple questions of people who you disagree with just makes you look incredibly lazy (possibly incredibly dumb too). Anyway having said that I'll indulge you. 1. What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The truth is we don't know because Italy weren't allowed to do it. As I already pointed out in an earlier comment it Could have turned out great and Italy could have had high growth and avoided recession or it could have gone badly and Italy hit recession. We'll never know. What we do know is the EU rejected it, and insisted Italy change it, the EU's input has now lead to Italy going into recession. 2. The Italian budget was to keep election promises before the threat of a recession. Do I disagree? In response to this firstly you seem to be forgetting that no 1 party won outright in the Italian election. The new Italian government is a coalition of 2 parties and so no one party can fully implement it's manifesto or keep all of its election promises. There was a compromise between the 2 parties on what they were going to do after forming a coalition partnership following the election result. 3. What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? Again it would have depended on the economic results of said spending plan, which we will now never know because the EU rejected it. I refer you to the answer to question 1. If the spending plan had been allowed and had been a success then Italy would have been experiencing growth now and would have used money from that growth to pay back the budget deficit to the EU. If it had gone badly Italy would have been in recession, but as the EU rejected the plan the EU's input has still lead to Italy being in recession now anyway. 4. What economic argument makes me come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Well considering respected independent economists like Steve Keen and Yanis Varoufarkis have called the ECB a bunch of idiots who haven't got a clue what they're doing coupled with previous very poor decisions that have turned out to be a disaster for the EU and the Eurozone then I'm not inclined to have much faith in the abilities of the ECB. The new coalition government in Italy is an unknown factor as they had never been in power before and had no track record to compare previous performance against so I'd be willing to give them a shot at it, rather than the ECB and the EU who's previous track record is littered with one disaster after another. " You have not the slightest clue what this is about do you? You're just ranting because Italy's budget plan was rejected, even though you have no idea why Putting a number next to your "responses" doesn't make them valid. Starting with your initial promise of not knowing if you don't try it is it, utter rubbish. That's what you use knowledge, experience, maths, simulations and intelligence for. Not popular nowadays, but planning is a "thing" especially in the context of a national economy. Italy made a plan. The EU reviewed it and called the assumptions used out as a fantasy, as did the market in increasing the cost of its borrowing. This has never happened before because every other country consults first and negotiated a budget that avoids adverse effects on their economy and people. Italy choose to show-boat and their people suffered. It doesn't matter if they are a coalition. They have agreed to maintain policies which will substantially increase national debt with little prospect of paying it back. There are a number of rules in place to maintain the stability of the currency and economies tied to it. Should you ignore rules when they don't suit you? The consequence of that is that people don't trust you. They don't believe your promises. Italy's debt is already equal to 131% GDP already double the limit and proposing to increase it further. Primarily through reducing the retirement age from 67 to 62 and introducing a minimum basic income and tax reductions. A 2.4% budget deficit. That's a big number when you're already in heavy debt. They were claiming that this would be paid back with later increases in VAT and a 1.5% growth rate and, perversely, reductions in infrastructure investment. Neither of which were believed as credible. In return the Italian government agreed to actually enforce its tax collection rules! Did you know that a budget was agreed, despite everything? A budget that still breaches the rules? A budget that Italy claimed would be generating 1% growth, which incidentally nobody believes even now. It could've agreed all of these measures months ago but delayed for publicity. Their borrowing costs did at least fall as a result. The Italian government claimed that this agreed budget will abolish poverty. Conti told the Italian parliament that it turned out that they didn't need less money than I foreseen. So the ECB was correct to object it seems ?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here." There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. Shall we see if you can back up what you say? Let's try this again if you want an economic argument. If you can answer then you could convince us all. If not we know it's just the Daily Express again What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The Italian budget was to keep election promises before a threat of a recession. Do you disagree? What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Oh here we go, Mr 20 questions again. It seems I'm not the only one who notices you always do this when someone makes a point you don't like, as sponge and JimiUk had also brought it up on other threads. I think JimiUK said when you asked him 20 questions that all of your questions are easily Googled. This tactic of yours asking multiple questions of people who you disagree with just makes you look incredibly lazy (possibly incredibly dumb too). Anyway having said that I'll indulge you. 1. What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The truth is we don't know because Italy weren't allowed to do it. As I already pointed out in an earlier comment it Could have turned out great and Italy could have had high growth and avoided recession or it could have gone badly and Italy hit recession. We'll never know. What we do know is the EU rejected it, and insisted Italy change it, the EU's input has now lead to Italy going into recession. 2. The Italian budget was to keep election promises before the threat of a recession. Do I disagree? In response to this firstly you seem to be forgetting that no 1 party won outright in the Italian election. The new Italian government is a coalition of 2 parties and so no one party can fully implement it's manifesto or keep all of its election promises. There was a compromise between the 2 parties on what they were going to do after forming a coalition partnership following the election result. 3. What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? Again it would have depended on the economic results of said spending plan, which we will now never know because the EU rejected it. I refer you to the answer to question 1. If the spending plan had been allowed and had been a success then Italy would have been experiencing growth now and would have used money from that growth to pay back the budget deficit to the EU. If it had gone badly Italy would have been in recession, but as the EU rejected the plan the EU's input has still lead to Italy being in recession now anyway. 4. What economic argument makes me come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Well considering respected independent economists like Steve Keen and Yanis Varoufarkis have called the ECB a bunch of idiots who haven't got a clue what they're doing coupled with previous very poor decisions that have turned out to be a disaster for the EU and the Eurozone then I'm not inclined to have much faith in the abilities of the ECB. The new coalition government in Italy is an unknown factor as they had never been in power before and had no track record to compare previous performance against so I'd be willing to give them a shot at it, rather than the ECB and the EU who's previous track record is littered with one disaster after another. You have not the slightest clue what this is about do you? You're just ranting because Italy's budget plan was rejected, even though you have no idea why Putting a number next to your "responses" doesn't make them valid. Starting with your initial promise of not knowing if you don't try it is it, utter rubbish. That's what you use knowledge, experience, maths, simulations and intelligence for. Not popular nowadays, but planning is a "thing" especially in the context of a national economy. Italy made a plan. The EU reviewed it and called the assumptions used out as a fantasy, as did the market in increasing the cost of its borrowing. This has never happened before because every other country consults first and negotiated a budget that avoids adverse effects on their economy and people. Italy choose to show-boat and their people suffered. It doesn't matter if they are a coalition. They have agreed to maintain policies which will substantially increase national debt with little prospect of paying it back. There are a number of rules in place to maintain the stability of the currency and economies tied to it. Should you ignore rules when they don't suit you? The consequence of that is that people don't trust you. They don't believe your promises. Italy's debt is already equal to 131% GDP already double the limit and proposing to increase it further. Primarily through reducing the retirement age from 67 to 62 and introducing a minimum basic income and tax reductions. A 2.4% budget deficit. That's a big number when you're already in heavy debt. They were claiming that this would be paid back with later increases in VAT and a 1.5% growth rate and, perversely, reductions in infrastructure investment. Neither of which were believed as credible. In return the Italian government agreed to actually enforce its tax collection rules! Did you know that a budget was agreed, despite everything? A budget that still breaches the rules? A budget that Italy claimed would be generating 1% growth, which incidentally nobody believes even now. It could've agreed all of these measures months ago but delayed for publicity. Their borrowing costs did at least fall as a result. The Italian government claimed that this agreed budget will abolish poverty. Conti told the Italian parliament that it turned out that they didn't need less money than I foreseen. So the ECB was correct to object it seems ??" So you're admitting Italy is no longer an independent sovereign country in the EU because they can't control their own finances and their own budget. Glad we've established that at least. #EUwin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries." Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. Shall we see if you can back up what you say? Let's try this again if you want an economic argument. If you can answer then you could convince us all. If not we know it's just the Daily Express again What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The Italian budget was to keep election promises before a threat of a recession. Do you disagree? What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Oh here we go, Mr 20 questions again. It seems I'm not the only one who notices you always do this when someone makes a point you don't like, as sponge and JimiUk had also brought it up on other threads. I think JimiUK said when you asked him 20 questions that all of your questions are easily Googled. This tactic of yours asking multiple questions of people who you disagree with just makes you look incredibly lazy (possibly incredibly dumb too). Anyway having said that I'll indulge you. 1. What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The truth is we don't know because Italy weren't allowed to do it. As I already pointed out in an earlier comment it Could have turned out great and Italy could have had high growth and avoided recession or it could have gone badly and Italy hit recession. We'll never know. What we do know is the EU rejected it, and insisted Italy change it, the EU's input has now lead to Italy going into recession. 2. The Italian budget was to keep election promises before the threat of a recession. Do I disagree? In response to this firstly you seem to be forgetting that no 1 party won outright in the Italian election. The new Italian government is a coalition of 2 parties and so no one party can fully implement it's manifesto or keep all of its election promises. There was a compromise between the 2 parties on what they were going to do after forming a coalition partnership following the election result. 3. What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? Again it would have depended on the economic results of said spending plan, which we will now never know because the EU rejected it. I refer you to the answer to question 1. If the spending plan had been allowed and had been a success then Italy would have been experiencing growth now and would have used money from that growth to pay back the budget deficit to the EU. If it had gone badly Italy would have been in recession, but as the EU rejected the plan the EU's input has still lead to Italy being in recession now anyway. 4. What economic argument makes me come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Well considering respected independent economists like Steve Keen and Yanis Varoufarkis have called the ECB a bunch of idiots who haven't got a clue what they're doing coupled with previous very poor decisions that have turned out to be a disaster for the EU and the Eurozone then I'm not inclined to have much faith in the abilities of the ECB. The new coalition government in Italy is an unknown factor as they had never been in power before and had no track record to compare previous performance against so I'd be willing to give them a shot at it, rather than the ECB and the EU who's previous track record is littered with one disaster after another. You have not the slightest clue what this is about do you? You're just ranting because Italy's budget plan was rejected, even though you have no idea why Putting a number next to your "responses" doesn't make them valid. Starting with your initial promise of not knowing if you don't try it is it, utter rubbish. That's what you use knowledge, experience, maths, simulations and intelligence for. Not popular nowadays, but planning is a "thing" especially in the context of a national economy. Italy made a plan. The EU reviewed it and called the assumptions used out as a fantasy, as did the market in increasing the cost of its borrowing. This has never happened before because every other country consults first and negotiated a budget that avoids adverse effects on their economy and people. Italy choose to show-boat and their people suffered. It doesn't matter if they are a coalition. They have agreed to maintain policies which will substantially increase national debt with little prospect of paying it back. There are a number of rules in place to maintain the stability of the currency and economies tied to it. Should you ignore rules when they don't suit you? The consequence of that is that people don't trust you. They don't believe your promises. Italy's debt is already equal to 131% GDP already double the limit and proposing to increase it further. Primarily through reducing the retirement age from 67 to 62 and introducing a minimum basic income and tax reductions. A 2.4% budget deficit. That's a big number when you're already in heavy debt. They were claiming that this would be paid back with later increases in VAT and a 1.5% growth rate and, perversely, reductions in infrastructure investment. Neither of which were believed as credible. In return the Italian government agreed to actually enforce its tax collection rules! Did you know that a budget was agreed, despite everything? A budget that still breaches the rules? A budget that Italy claimed would be generating 1% growth, which incidentally nobody believes even now. It could've agreed all of these measures months ago but delayed for publicity. Their borrowing costs did at least fall as a result. The Italian government claimed that this agreed budget will abolish poverty. Conti told the Italian parliament that it turned out that they didn't need less money than I foreseen. So the ECB was correct to object it seems ?? So you're admitting Italy is no longer an independent sovereign country in the EU because they can't control their own finances and their own budget. Glad we've established that at least. #EUwin " They have agreed to abide by the terms of a finance agreement to use the Euro in the same way that you agree to abide by the terms of a trade agreement. In both cases that surrenders some sovereignty by mutual agreement for a net benefit. You've already said that sovereignty is not important because you're happy to surrender out to the WTO for the worst trade arrangements that exist on the planet so I'm not sure what your point is. #Brexitwin Cognitive dissonance echoing in your head. I notice that you have fled the economic argument that you didn't understand to begin with because you're flat wrong based on the Italian government's own assessment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. Shall we see if you can back up what you say? Let's try this again if you want an economic argument. If you can answer then you could convince us all. If not we know it's just the Daily Express again What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The Italian budget was to keep election promises before a threat of a recession. Do you disagree? What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Oh here we go, Mr 20 questions again. It seems I'm not the only one who notices you always do this when someone makes a point you don't like, as sponge and JimiUk had also brought it up on other threads. I think JimiUK said when you asked him 20 questions that all of your questions are easily Googled. This tactic of yours asking multiple questions of people who you disagree with just makes you look incredibly lazy (possibly incredibly dumb too). Anyway having said that I'll indulge you. 1. What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The truth is we don't know because Italy weren't allowed to do it. As I already pointed out in an earlier comment it Could have turned out great and Italy could have had high growth and avoided recession or it could have gone badly and Italy hit recession. We'll never know. What we do know is the EU rejected it, and insisted Italy change it, the EU's input has now lead to Italy going into recession. 2. The Italian budget was to keep election promises before the threat of a recession. Do I disagree? In response to this firstly you seem to be forgetting that no 1 party won outright in the Italian election. The new Italian government is a coalition of 2 parties and so no one party can fully implement it's manifesto or keep all of its election promises. There was a compromise between the 2 parties on what they were going to do after forming a coalition partnership following the election result. 3. What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? Again it would have depended on the economic results of said spending plan, which we will now never know because the EU rejected it. I refer you to the answer to question 1. If the spending plan had been allowed and had been a success then Italy would have been experiencing growth now and would have used money from that growth to pay back the budget deficit to the EU. If it had gone badly Italy would have been in recession, but as the EU rejected the plan the EU's input has still lead to Italy being in recession now anyway. 4. What economic argument makes me come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Well considering respected independent economists like Steve Keen and Yanis Varoufarkis have called the ECB a bunch of idiots who haven't got a clue what they're doing coupled with previous very poor decisions that have turned out to be a disaster for the EU and the Eurozone then I'm not inclined to have much faith in the abilities of the ECB. The new coalition government in Italy is an unknown factor as they had never been in power before and had no track record to compare previous performance against so I'd be willing to give them a shot at it, rather than the ECB and the EU who's previous track record is littered with one disaster after another. You have not the slightest clue what this is about do you? You're just ranting because Italy's budget plan was rejected, even though you have no idea why Putting a number next to your "responses" doesn't make them valid. Starting with your initial promise of not knowing if you don't try it is it, utter rubbish. That's what you use knowledge, experience, maths, simulations and intelligence for. Not popular nowadays, but planning is a "thing" especially in the context of a national economy. Italy made a plan. The EU reviewed it and called the assumptions used out as a fantasy, as did the market in increasing the cost of its borrowing. This has never happened before because every other country consults first and negotiated a budget that avoids adverse effects on their economy and people. Italy choose to show-boat and their people suffered. It doesn't matter if they are a coalition. They have agreed to maintain policies which will substantially increase national debt with little prospect of paying it back. There are a number of rules in place to maintain the stability of the currency and economies tied to it. Should you ignore rules when they don't suit you? The consequence of that is that people don't trust you. They don't believe your promises. Italy's debt is already equal to 131% GDP already double the limit and proposing to increase it further. Primarily through reducing the retirement age from 67 to 62 and introducing a minimum basic income and tax reductions. A 2.4% budget deficit. That's a big number when you're already in heavy debt. They were claiming that this would be paid back with later increases in VAT and a 1.5% growth rate and, perversely, reductions in infrastructure investment. Neither of which were believed as credible. In return the Italian government agreed to actually enforce its tax collection rules! Did you know that a budget was agreed, despite everything? A budget that still breaches the rules? A budget that Italy claimed would be generating 1% growth, which incidentally nobody believes even now. It could've agreed all of these measures months ago but delayed for publicity. Their borrowing costs did at least fall as a result. The Italian government claimed that this agreed budget will abolish poverty. Conti told the Italian parliament that it turned out that they didn't need less money than I foreseen. So the ECB was correct to object it seems ?? So you're admitting Italy is no longer an independent sovereign country in the EU because they can't control their own finances and their own budget. Glad we've established that at least. #EUwin They have agreed to abide by the terms of a finance agreement to use the Euro in the same way that you agree to abide by the terms of a trade agreement. In both cases that surrenders some sovereignty by mutual agreement for a net benefit. You've already said that sovereignty is not important because you're happy to surrender out to the WTO for the worst trade arrangements that exist on the planet so I'm not sure what your point is. #Brexitwin Cognitive dissonance echoing in your head. I notice that you have fled the economic argument that you didn't understand to begin with because you're flat wrong based on the Italian government's own assessment " The economic argument hasn't been proved wrong because the original Italian budget was never tested. You can't prove something wrong if it's never been used or tried. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. " No. The clue is in the words again. "Hurried along" and "earlier and deeper" because of Trump not caused by him. Poorer economies do usually grow faster than wealthy ones. That's as it should be. A small economy doubling in size is still a small economy even though it's grown by a huge percentage. It doesn't mean that most people can afford to buy what we sell. That's how percentages work. So let's look at equivalent economies. G7 for instance have had comparable growth over the long term except for the completely independent Japan which has stagnant for decades. We were at the top of the chart, in the EU, until we decided to leave and fell out of the bottom. The most sensible course under any reading would be to keep your rich nearby market plus the 70 others that you have trade deals with (5 out of 7 G7 countries) and grow the rest. You've never answered why Germany manages to trade so much more successfully with China from within the EU than we can and what you think will miraculously change of we leave. Especially as the USA excludes the possibility of doing a deal with China. Loss of sovereignty right there. Our employment figures include people working one hour per week. The food banks are being needed more than ever. Is everyone happy? No, and it's nothing whatsoever to do with the EU, it's too do with multinational corporations not feeling the need to look after their staff with proper wages and benefits. The solution is not becoming a country in its own more desperate for investment than ever. The solution is in global cooperation and agreements. Making rules and following them even if they occassionaly prove inconvenient. You know, like the global financial regulations that were slackened off to make more money but leading to a global financial collapse. You just don't think beyond the headlines you want to read. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" No, you've tried to blame Italy and Italy alone, even after its been pointed out to you the EU refused the new Italian coalition government's budget. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that, and it follows that because the EU refused the Italian budget then the EU also has to take responsibility for the economic situation Italy now finds itself in. So you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies just so you feel justified in blaming the EU for everything. It's a bit pathetic really. Who is to say the independent Italian coalition budget would have been terrible? That's a massive assumption you're making there. The truth is we will never know how it would have turned out because the EU refused it. If you're going to make a completely made up assumption that it would have been terrible then i can make a massive made up assumption that it would have been brilliant and would have taken Italy out of recession. Back to the hard facts and what we do know is the EU had its own input on the Italian budget which has now put Italy in recession. The EU has to take its share of responsibility for that. I never said the Italians "proposed budget" was going to be terrible did I, try reading again!!! I'm clearly stating you blame the EU for everything even when problems are clearly member states government's own handling and nothing to do with the EU. So once I saw you were putting words in my mouth just so you could twist your alternative facts I stopped reading your bullshit. You are a waste of debating space on this forum and cannot understand for the life of me why someone would so openly lie and end up ridiculing themselves on such a regular basis. You said and I quote, "so you give the government's of member states total free passes over their terrible handling of their own economies". Now given we're talking about Italy here you must have been referring to them. The new coalition government in Italy had never been in power there before, they had no track record to look back on. Their new budget when they came to office was rejected by the EU even though they had no track record to compare against previously. So explain how I'm giving them a total free pass on their terrible handling of their own economy, when they had never been in power before? Your posts on this make absolutely no sense what so ever. We'll never know how their new budget would've turned out because it was never given a chance. It could have turned out great and Italy may not have been in recession now. It could have gone badly and Italy could have gone into recession. We will never know. What we do know for sure is the EU rejected it and insisted that Italy change it. The EU's input into a new budget and having it changed has now seen Italy in recession today. Shall we see if you can back up what you say? Let's try this again if you want an economic argument. If you can answer then you could convince us all. If not we know it's just the Daily Express again What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The Italian budget was to keep election promises before a threat of a recession. Do you disagree? What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? What economic argument makes you come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Oh here we go, Mr 20 questions again. It seems I'm not the only one who notices you always do this when someone makes a point you don't like, as sponge and JimiUk had also brought it up on other threads. I think JimiUK said when you asked him 20 questions that all of your questions are easily Googled. This tactic of yours asking multiple questions of people who you disagree with just makes you look incredibly lazy (possibly incredibly dumb too). Anyway having said that I'll indulge you. 1. What are the consequences to other countries if the ECB allows Italy to do this? The truth is we don't know because Italy weren't allowed to do it. As I already pointed out in an earlier comment it Could have turned out great and Italy could have had high growth and avoided recession or it could have gone badly and Italy hit recession. We'll never know. What we do know is the EU rejected it, and insisted Italy change it, the EU's input has now lead to Italy going into recession. 2. The Italian budget was to keep election promises before the threat of a recession. Do I disagree? In response to this firstly you seem to be forgetting that no 1 party won outright in the Italian election. The new Italian government is a coalition of 2 parties and so no one party can fully implement it's manifesto or keep all of its election promises. There was a compromise between the 2 parties on what they were going to do after forming a coalition partnership following the election result. 3. What are the pros and cons to both Italy and the Eurozone of allowing such a huge budget deficit based on the proposed spending plan? Again it would have depended on the economic results of said spending plan, which we will now never know because the EU rejected it. I refer you to the answer to question 1. If the spending plan had been allowed and had been a success then Italy would have been experiencing growth now and would have used money from that growth to pay back the budget deficit to the EU. If it had gone badly Italy would have been in recession, but as the EU rejected the plan the EU's input has still lead to Italy being in recession now anyway. 4. What economic argument makes me come down in favour of Italy rather than the ECB? Well considering respected independent economists like Steve Keen and Yanis Varoufarkis have called the ECB a bunch of idiots who haven't got a clue what they're doing coupled with previous very poor decisions that have turned out to be a disaster for the EU and the Eurozone then I'm not inclined to have much faith in the abilities of the ECB. The new coalition government in Italy is an unknown factor as they had never been in power before and had no track record to compare previous performance against so I'd be willing to give them a shot at it, rather than the ECB and the EU who's previous track record is littered with one disaster after another. You have not the slightest clue what this is about do you? You're just ranting because Italy's budget plan was rejected, even though you have no idea why Putting a number next to your "responses" doesn't make them valid. Starting with your initial promise of not knowing if you don't try it is it, utter rubbish. That's what you use knowledge, experience, maths, simulations and intelligence for. Not popular nowadays, but planning is a "thing" especially in the context of a national economy. Italy made a plan. The EU reviewed it and called the assumptions used out as a fantasy, as did the market in increasing the cost of its borrowing. This has never happened before because every other country consults first and negotiated a budget that avoids adverse effects on their economy and people. Italy choose to show-boat and their people suffered. It doesn't matter if they are a coalition. They have agreed to maintain policies which will substantially increase national debt with little prospect of paying it back. There are a number of rules in place to maintain the stability of the currency and economies tied to it. Should you ignore rules when they don't suit you? The consequence of that is that people don't trust you. They don't believe your promises. Italy's debt is already equal to 131% GDP already double the limit and proposing to increase it further. Primarily through reducing the retirement age from 67 to 62 and introducing a minimum basic income and tax reductions. A 2.4% budget deficit. That's a big number when you're already in heavy debt. They were claiming that this would be paid back with later increases in VAT and a 1.5% growth rate and, perversely, reductions in infrastructure investment. Neither of which were believed as credible. In return the Italian government agreed to actually enforce its tax collection rules! Did you know that a budget was agreed, despite everything? A budget that still breaches the rules? A budget that Italy claimed would be generating 1% growth, which incidentally nobody believes even now. It could've agreed all of these measures months ago but delayed for publicity. Their borrowing costs did at least fall as a result. The Italian government claimed that this agreed budget will abolish poverty. Conti told the Italian parliament that it turned out that they didn't need less money than I foreseen. So the ECB was correct to object it seems ?? So you're admitting Italy is no longer an independent sovereign country in the EU because they can't control their own finances and their own budget. Glad we've established that at least. #EUwin They have agreed to abide by the terms of a finance agreement to use the Euro in the same way that you agree to abide by the terms of a trade agreement. In both cases that surrenders some sovereignty by mutual agreement for a net benefit. You've already said that sovereignty is not important because you're happy to surrender out to the WTO for the worst trade arrangements that exist on the planet so I'm not sure what your point is. #Brexitwin Cognitive dissonance echoing in your head. I notice that you have fled the economic argument that you didn't understand to begin with because you're flat wrong based on the Italian government's own assessment The economic argument hasn't been proved wrong because the original Italian budget was never tested. You can't prove something wrong if it's never been used or tried. " "Conti told the Italian parliament that it turned out that they needed less money than it had foreseen." What does that say to you Centaur? The people who asked for the rejected budget said that the one that they finally agreed was all that was actually necessary. You're saying that the Italian government is also wrong now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. No. The clue is in the words again. "Hurried along" and "earlier and deeper" because of Trump not caused by him. Poorer economies do usually grow faster than wealthy ones. That's as it should be. A small economy doubling in size is still a small economy even though it's grown by a huge percentage. It doesn't mean that most people can afford to buy what we sell. That's how percentages work. So let's look at equivalent economies. G7 for instance have had comparable growth over the long term except for the completely independent Japan which has stagnant for decades. We were at the top of the chart, in the EU, until we decided to leave and fell out of the bottom. The most sensible course under any reading would be to keep your rich nearby market plus the 70 others that you have trade deals with (5 out of 7 G7 countries) and grow the rest. You've never answered why Germany manages to trade so much more successfully with China from within the EU than we can and what you think will miraculously change of we leave. Especially as the USA excludes the possibility of doing a deal with China. Loss of sovereignty right there. Our employment figures include people working one hour per week. The food banks are being needed more than ever. Is everyone happy? No, and it's nothing whatsoever to do with the EU, it's too do with multinational corporations not feeling the need to look after their staff with proper wages and benefits. The solution is not becoming a country in its own more desperate for investment than ever. The solution is in global cooperation and agreements. Making rules and following them even if they occassionaly prove inconvenient. You know, like the global financial regulations that were slackened off to make more money but leading to a global financial collapse. You just don't think beyond the headlines you want to read. " I'm not talking about poorer economies growing faster than wealthy one's, it was more a reference to economies of similar wealth and size to the EU consistently doing better than the EU. China and USA are two well developed, wealthy economies, and similar size to the EU, and they've consistently had bigger and better growth figures than the EU. As I said Earlier the only continent in the world with lower growth than the EU has been Antarctica. Is that China's fault or the USA's fault? No you need to look closer to home, it's the EU'S fault. It's the EU's own failed economic model for the Eurozone that is the problem, it's lazy and cheap of you to try to blame the rest of the world for the EU's failings. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. No. The clue is in the words again. "Hurried along" and "earlier and deeper" because of Trump not caused by him. Poorer economies do usually grow faster than wealthy ones. That's as it should be. A small economy doubling in size is still a small economy even though it's grown by a huge percentage. It doesn't mean that most people can afford to buy what we sell. That's how percentages work. So let's look at equivalent economies. G7 for instance have had comparable growth over the long term except for the completely independent Japan which has stagnant for decades. We were at the top of the chart, in the EU, until we decided to leave and fell out of the bottom. The most sensible course under any reading would be to keep your rich nearby market plus the 70 others that you have trade deals with (5 out of 7 G7 countries) and grow the rest. You've never answered why Germany manages to trade so much more successfully with China from within the EU than we can and what you think will miraculously change of we leave. Especially as the USA excludes the possibility of doing a deal with China. Loss of sovereignty right there. Our employment figures include people working one hour per week. The food banks are being needed more than ever. Is everyone happy? No, and it's nothing whatsoever to do with the EU, it's too do with multinational corporations not feeling the need to look after their staff with proper wages and benefits. The solution is not becoming a country in its own more desperate for investment than ever. The solution is in global cooperation and agreements. Making rules and following them even if they occassionaly prove inconvenient. You know, like the global financial regulations that were slackened off to make more money but leading to a global financial collapse. You just don't think beyond the headlines you want to read. I'm not talking about poorer economies growing faster than wealthy one's, it was more a reference to economies of similar wealth and size to the EU consistently doing better than the EU. China and USA are two well developed, wealthy economies, and similar size to the EU, and they've consistently had bigger and better growth figures than the EU. As I said Earlier the only continent in the world with lower growth than the EU has been Antarctica. Is that China's fault or the USA's fault? No you need to look closer to home, it's the EU'S fault. It's the EU's own failed economic model for the Eurozone that is the problem, it's lazy and cheap of you to try to blame the rest of the world for the EU's failings. " You are spectacular in arguing vociferously despite your lack of knowledge. Why not so and do some research before sounding off? China is not a well developed economy. It's a large one but developing. It's very fast growth rate is so high because it started from such low base. The USA and the EU have had almost identical growth rates over the last twenty years. What are you looking at that claims otherwise? However the poorer EU Nations have had very, very high growth. I guess if you just continue to make stuff up you can make any argument you choose | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy." So, you get a kick out of seeing the misery of others? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. No. The clue is in the words again. "Hurried along" and "earlier and deeper" because of Trump not caused by him. Poorer economies do usually grow faster than wealthy ones. That's as it should be. A small economy doubling in size is still a small economy even though it's grown by a huge percentage. It doesn't mean that most people can afford to buy what we sell. That's how percentages work. So let's look at equivalent economies. G7 for instance have had comparable growth over the long term except for the completely independent Japan which has stagnant for decades. We were at the top of the chart, in the EU, until we decided to leave and fell out of the bottom. The most sensible course under any reading would be to keep your rich nearby market plus the 70 others that you have trade deals with (5 out of 7 G7 countries) and grow the rest. You've never answered why Germany manages to trade so much more successfully with China from within the EU than we can and what you think will miraculously change of we leave. Especially as the USA excludes the possibility of doing a deal with China. Loss of sovereignty right there. Our employment figures include people working one hour per week. The food banks are being needed more than ever. Is everyone happy? No, and it's nothing whatsoever to do with the EU, it's too do with multinational corporations not feeling the need to look after their staff with proper wages and benefits. The solution is not becoming a country in its own more desperate for investment than ever. The solution is in global cooperation and agreements. Making rules and following them even if they occassionaly prove inconvenient. You know, like the global financial regulations that were slackened off to make more money but leading to a global financial collapse. You just don't think beyond the headlines you want to read. I'm not talking about poorer economies growing faster than wealthy one's, it was more a reference to economies of similar wealth and size to the EU consistently doing better than the EU. China and USA are two well developed, wealthy economies, and similar size to the EU, and they've consistently had bigger and better growth figures than the EU. As I said Earlier the only continent in the world with lower growth than the EU has been Antarctica. Is that China's fault or the USA's fault? No you need to look closer to home, it's the EU'S fault. It's the EU's own failed economic model for the Eurozone that is the problem, it's lazy and cheap of you to try to blame the rest of the world for the EU's failings. You are spectacular in arguing vociferously despite your lack of knowledge. Why not so and do some research before sounding off? China is not a well developed economy. It's a large one but developing. It's very fast growth rate is so high because it started from such low base. The USA and the EU have had almost identical growth rates over the last twenty years. What are you looking at that claims otherwise? However the poorer EU Nations have had very, very high growth. I guess if you just continue to make stuff up you can make any argument you choose " China is soon set to overtake the USA as the number 1 economy in the world. It will soon be the most wealthy economy in the world. To suggest it is not developed is nonsense. It couldn't overtake the USA if It wasn't developed. I notice you didn't try to argue the point about the Eurozone being a failed economic model, so looks like you've finally conceded that at least. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. No. The clue is in the words again. "Hurried along" and "earlier and deeper" because of Trump not caused by him. Poorer economies do usually grow faster than wealthy ones. That's as it should be. A small economy doubling in size is still a small economy even though it's grown by a huge percentage. It doesn't mean that most people can afford to buy what we sell. That's how percentages work. So let's look at equivalent economies. G7 for instance have had comparable growth over the long term except for the completely independent Japan which has stagnant for decades. We were at the top of the chart, in the EU, until we decided to leave and fell out of the bottom. The most sensible course under any reading would be to keep your rich nearby market plus the 70 others that you have trade deals with (5 out of 7 G7 countries) and grow the rest. You've never answered why Germany manages to trade so much more successfully with China from within the EU than we can and what you think will miraculously change of we leave. Especially as the USA excludes the possibility of doing a deal with China. Loss of sovereignty right there. Our employment figures include people working one hour per week. The food banks are being needed more than ever. Is everyone happy? No, and it's nothing whatsoever to do with the EU, it's too do with multinational corporations not feeling the need to look after their staff with proper wages and benefits. The solution is not becoming a country in its own more desperate for investment than ever. The solution is in global cooperation and agreements. Making rules and following them even if they occassionaly prove inconvenient. You know, like the global financial regulations that were slackened off to make more money but leading to a global financial collapse. You just don't think beyond the headlines you want to read. I'm not talking about poorer economies growing faster than wealthy one's, it was more a reference to economies of similar wealth and size to the EU consistently doing better than the EU. China and USA are two well developed, wealthy economies, and similar size to the EU, and they've consistently had bigger and better growth figures than the EU. As I said Earlier the only continent in the world with lower growth than the EU has been Antarctica. Is that China's fault or the USA's fault? No you need to look closer to home, it's the EU'S fault. It's the EU's own failed economic model for the Eurozone that is the problem, it's lazy and cheap of you to try to blame the rest of the world for the EU's failings. You are spectacular in arguing vociferously despite your lack of knowledge. Why not so and do some research before sounding off? China is not a well developed economy. It's a large one but developing. It's very fast growth rate is so high because it started from such low base. The USA and the EU have had almost identical growth rates over the last twenty years. What are you looking at that claims otherwise? However the poorer EU Nations have had very, very high growth. I guess if you just continue to make stuff up you can make any argument you choose China is soon set to overtake the USA as the number 1 economy in the world. It will soon be the most wealthy economy in the world. To suggest it is not developed is nonsense. It couldn't overtake the USA if It wasn't developed. I notice you didn't try to argue the point about the Eurozone being a failed economic model, so looks like you've finally conceded that at least. " Wow. You really don't understand "stuff" or maths do you? Lots and lots of people earning a small amount of money = Some people earning a lot of money. The country is wealthy. Per person they are still poor. Do you grasp that or do I need to simplify it further for you? I did directly answer your jibber jabber about the EU being a "failed" economy. If EU GDP growth is almost identical to the USA over the last twenty years and better than Japan's then both the USA and Japan are also failed economies. Is that your contention? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Mass protests in Spain today to try to overthrow the left wing PM all to do with Catalonia independence.Might take their mind off Gibraltar for a while. " Ciudadanos and those nice Vox chaps..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. No. The clue is in the words again. "Hurried along" and "earlier and deeper" because of Trump not caused by him. Poorer economies do usually grow faster than wealthy ones. That's as it should be. A small economy doubling in size is still a small economy even though it's grown by a huge percentage. It doesn't mean that most people can afford to buy what we sell. That's how percentages work. So let's look at equivalent economies. G7 for instance have had comparable growth over the long term except for the completely independent Japan which has stagnant for decades. We were at the top of the chart, in the EU, until we decided to leave and fell out of the bottom. The most sensible course under any reading would be to keep your rich nearby market plus the 70 others that you have trade deals with (5 out of 7 G7 countries) and grow the rest. You've never answered why Germany manages to trade so much more successfully with China from within the EU than we can and what you think will miraculously change of we leave. Especially as the USA excludes the possibility of doing a deal with China. Loss of sovereignty right there. Our employment figures include people working one hour per week. The food banks are being needed more than ever. Is everyone happy? No, and it's nothing whatsoever to do with the EU, it's too do with multinational corporations not feeling the need to look after their staff with proper wages and benefits. The solution is not becoming a country in its own more desperate for investment than ever. The solution is in global cooperation and agreements. Making rules and following them even if they occassionaly prove inconvenient. You know, like the global financial regulations that were slackened off to make more money but leading to a global financial collapse. You just don't think beyond the headlines you want to read. I'm not talking about poorer economies growing faster than wealthy one's, it was more a reference to economies of similar wealth and size to the EU consistently doing better than the EU. China and USA are two well developed, wealthy economies, and similar size to the EU, and they've consistently had bigger and better growth figures than the EU. As I said Earlier the only continent in the world with lower growth than the EU has been Antarctica. Is that China's fault or the USA's fault? No you need to look closer to home, it's the EU'S fault. It's the EU's own failed economic model for the Eurozone that is the problem, it's lazy and cheap of you to try to blame the rest of the world for the EU's failings. You are spectacular in arguing vociferously despite your lack of knowledge. Why not so and do some research before sounding off? China is not a well developed economy. It's a large one but developing. It's very fast growth rate is so high because it started from such low base. The USA and the EU have had almost identical growth rates over the last twenty years. What are you looking at that claims otherwise? However the poorer EU Nations have had very, very high growth. I guess if you just continue to make stuff up you can make any argument you choose China is soon set to overtake the USA as the number 1 economy in the world. It will soon be the most wealthy economy in the world. To suggest it is not developed is nonsense. It couldn't overtake the USA if It wasn't developed. I notice you didn't try to argue the point about the Eurozone being a failed economic model, so looks like you've finally conceded that at least. Wow. You really don't understand "stuff" or maths do you? Lots and lots of people earning a small amount of money = Some people earning a lot of money. The country is wealthy. Per person they are still poor. Do you grasp that or do I need to simplify it further for you? I did directly answer your jibber jabber about the EU being a "failed" economy. If EU GDP growth is almost identical to the USA over the last twenty years and better than Japan's then both the USA and Japan are also failed economies. Is that your contention?" It's you who has no understanding about "stuff" or maths here. The logic of what you're saying just doesn't add up. You say lots and lots of people earning a small amount of money = some people earning a lot of money. The country is wealthy, per person they are still poor. If you think that applies then it should also logically apply to other areas of the world, but it doesn't. Take Africa as an example. Africa is the 2nd most densely populated continent on the planet. There are lots and lots of people earning a small amount of money there, and there are some people there earning a lot of money (usually through corruption). Using your logic then Africa should be wealthy, even though per person they are still poor, but the African continent is not really considered wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Do you grasp that or do I need to simplify it further for you? As for the nonsense you came out with about the USA compared to the EU, your ignoring key aspects as to why the Eurozone model is a failed economic model compared to the USA. You say the EU GDP growth has been almost identical to the USA for the last 20 years and that's fair enough. What you failed to mention was how many US states have gone bankrupt and have had to be bailed out over the last 20 years compared to EU members? Not one US state has declared itself bankrupt as I recall but in the EU Greece has gone bankrupt since joining the Euro and has needed bailing out, not once but twice. Rep of Ireland, Portugal and Cyprus have also needed bailing out since joining the Euro. The Euro is a failed economic model in the EU and the evidence is plain to see. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"sure.... lets take africa as an example.... you could add up all the economies of every single country in africa.... and it would still be smaller than the economy of france..... so lets then take france.... and add 26 other european countries to the mix.... now... if i were a business, i know where i would be looking at being my biggest priority...... that is the reality of what you are talking about" If you're referring to Brexit with this then Africa isn't really the priority, although it's still good to have free trade with Africa to help them out of poverty. As pointed to in earlier comments the priorities for trade after Brexit should be with America and Asia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"sure.... lets take africa as an example.... you could add up all the economies of every single country in africa.... and it would still be smaller than the economy of france..... so lets then take france.... and add 26 other european countries to the mix.... now... if i were a business, i know where i would be looking at being my biggest priority...... that is the reality of what you are talking about If you're referring to Brexit with this then Africa isn't really the priority, although it's still good to have free trade with Africa to help them out of poverty. As pointed to in earlier comments the priorities for trade after Brexit should be with America and Asia. " 1) how benevalant of you to help those poor african countries... nothing to do with the british empire taking advantage of their natural resources in the first place...... 2) since we have a fair idea of what the US want... https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/politics/850305 how much of that lot are you willing to give up for your super duper us trade deal......... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"sure.... lets take africa as an example.... you could add up all the economies of every single country in africa.... and it would still be smaller than the economy of france..... so lets then take france.... and add 26 other european countries to the mix.... now... if i were a business, i know where i would be looking at being my biggest priority...... that is the reality of what you are talking about If you're referring to Brexit with this then Africa isn't really the priority, although it's still good to have free trade with Africa to help them out of poverty. As pointed to in earlier comments the priorities for trade after Brexit should be with America and Asia. " Also Fabio as you bring up France, that would be the same France that is now tipping into recession, and the same France that has been tearing itself apart with protests against Macron for the past 2 months!!! When I posted the 'Anti Macron protests in France' thread in December after the first weekend of yellow vest protests, you swore blind they weren't protests against Macron, you swore blind they were only protests about rising fuel taxes. I said they were protests against Macron. Looks like you've made a complete fool of yourself yet again on that score, just as you misjudged the mood of the USA in the Presidential election, you were so cocky and arrogant in assuming Clinton would win but you were proved wrong. Yet again it looks like you've misjudged the mood of the nation in France and your comments on that Macron thread in December pointed to a complete lack of understanding of the situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"sure.... lets take africa as an example.... you could add up all the economies of every single country in africa.... and it would still be smaller than the economy of france..... so lets then take france.... and add 26 other european countries to the mix.... now... if i were a business, i know where i would be looking at being my biggest priority...... that is the reality of what you are talking about If you're referring to Brexit with this then Africa isn't really the priority, although it's still good to have free trade with Africa to help them out of poverty. As pointed to in earlier comments the priorities for trade after Brexit should be with America and Asia. Also Fabio as you bring up France, that would be the same France that is now tipping into recession, and the same France that has been tearing itself apart with protests against Macron for the past 2 months!!! When I posted the 'Anti Macron protests in France' thread in December after the first weekend of yellow vest protests, you swore blind they weren't protests against Macron, you swore blind they were only protests about rising fuel taxes. I said they were protests against Macron. Looks like you've made a complete fool of yourself yet again on that score, just as you misjudged the mood of the USA in the Presidential election, you were so cocky and arrogant in assuming Clinton would win but you were proved wrong. Yet again it looks like you've misjudged the mood of the nation in France and your comments on that Macron thread in December pointed to a complete lack of understanding of the situation. " Guess what it's the front national and left extremes that are now fighting between themselves! Support has fallen consistently since the violence has taken over! Its coming your way when you realise the right elites have shafted you! Oh another brexiteer just "bought" a EU passport in Malta! Is he hedging his bets? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"sure.... lets take africa as an example.... you could add up all the economies of every single country in africa.... and it would still be smaller than the economy of france..... so lets then take france.... and add 26 other european countries to the mix.... now... if i were a business, i know where i would be looking at being my biggest priority...... that is the reality of what you are talking about If you're referring to Brexit with this then Africa isn't really the priority, although it's still good to have free trade with Africa to help them out of poverty. As pointed to in earlier comments the priorities for trade after Brexit should be with America and Asia. " Can I suggest Singapore, Japan and Canada as they seem to be open to trade agreements without demanding we drop standards. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just going back to the OP for a moment. Figures released this morning show German factory orders fell by 1.6% in December and 7% compared to the same month last year (The largest drop since 2012) This prompted Deutsche Bank to warn that Germany is "drifting towards recession". That comes on the back of Germania airline going into administration this week. Only just over a year after the demise of Air Berlin. Blame whatever you like on Brexit but it sure aint sunshine a roses over here. There is absolutely a global contraction hurried along due to Trump's trade war. It would have come anyway but we'll have it earlier and deeper. Germany exports more so are going to be more effected by the slow down in China. We don't manage to sell so far afield. Our fault unfortunately, but you only need to look at JLR writing down a £3bn loss to see the problem with large here. This is exacerbated by Brexit leading to purchase substitution from more predictable countries. Ohh so it's all Trumps fault now. Wondered when that little gem would come along. Nothing to do with the EU being a failing project which has had the lowest growth of any continent except Antarctica. No nothing to see here where youth unemployment in southern Europe has skyrocketed over the last decade. Nothing to see here in France where Macron has become a virtual prisoner hiding behind his sofa from the yellow vests. No look over there, it's all that Nasty Trump's fault. No. The clue is in the words again. "Hurried along" and "earlier and deeper" because of Trump not caused by him. Poorer economies do usually grow faster than wealthy ones. That's as it should be. A small economy doubling in size is still a small economy even though it's grown by a huge percentage. It doesn't mean that most people can afford to buy what we sell. That's how percentages work. So let's look at equivalent economies. G7 for instance have had comparable growth over the long term except for the completely independent Japan which has stagnant for decades. We were at the top of the chart, in the EU, until we decided to leave and fell out of the bottom. The most sensible course under any reading would be to keep your rich nearby market plus the 70 others that you have trade deals with (5 out of 7 G7 countries) and grow the rest. You've never answered why Germany manages to trade so much more successfully with China from within the EU than we can and what you think will miraculously change of we leave. Especially as the USA excludes the possibility of doing a deal with China. Loss of sovereignty right there. Our employment figures include people working one hour per week. The food banks are being needed more than ever. Is everyone happy? No, and it's nothing whatsoever to do with the EU, it's too do with multinational corporations not feeling the need to look after their staff with proper wages and benefits. The solution is not becoming a country in its own more desperate for investment than ever. The solution is in global cooperation and agreements. Making rules and following them even if they occassionaly prove inconvenient. You know, like the global financial regulations that were slackened off to make more money but leading to a global financial collapse. You just don't think beyond the headlines you want to read. I'm not talking about poorer economies growing faster than wealthy one's, it was more a reference to economies of similar wealth and size to the EU consistently doing better than the EU. China and USA are two well developed, wealthy economies, and similar size to the EU, and they've consistently had bigger and better growth figures than the EU. As I said Earlier the only continent in the world with lower growth than the EU has been Antarctica. Is that China's fault or the USA's fault? No you need to look closer to home, it's the EU'S fault. It's the EU's own failed economic model for the Eurozone that is the problem, it's lazy and cheap of you to try to blame the rest of the world for the EU's failings. You are spectacular in arguing vociferously despite your lack of knowledge. Why not so and do some research before sounding off? China is not a well developed economy. It's a large one but developing. It's very fast growth rate is so high because it started from such low base. The USA and the EU have had almost identical growth rates over the last twenty years. What are you looking at that claims otherwise? However the poorer EU Nations have had very, very high growth. I guess if you just continue to make stuff up you can make any argument you choose China is soon set to overtake the USA as the number 1 economy in the world. It will soon be the most wealthy economy in the world. To suggest it is not developed is nonsense. It couldn't overtake the USA if It wasn't developed. I notice you didn't try to argue the point about the Eurozone being a failed economic model, so looks like you've finally conceded that at least. Wow. You really don't understand "stuff" or maths do you? Lots and lots of people earning a small amount of money = Some people earning a lot of money. The country is wealthy. Per person they are still poor. Do you grasp that or do I need to simplify it further for you? I did directly answer your jibber jabber about the EU being a "failed" economy. If EU GDP growth is almost identical to the USA over the last twenty years and better than Japan's then both the USA and Japan are also failed economies. Is that your contention? It's you who has no understanding about "stuff" or maths here. The logic of what you're saying just doesn't add up. You say lots and lots of people earning a small amount of money = some people earning a lot of money. The country is wealthy, per person they are still poor. If you think that applies then it should also logically apply to other areas of the world, but it doesn't. Take Africa as an example. Africa is the 2nd most densely populated continent on the planet. There are lots and lots of people earning a small amount of money there, and there are some people there earning a lot of money (usually through corruption). Using your logic then Africa should be wealthy, even though per person they are still poor, but the African continent is not really considered wealthy by any stretch of the imagination. Do you grasp that or do I need to simplify it further for you? As for the nonsense you came out with about the USA compared to the EU, your ignoring key aspects as to why the Eurozone model is a failed economic model compared to the USA. You say the EU GDP growth has been almost identical to the USA for the last 20 years and that's fair enough. What you failed to mention was how many US states have gone bankrupt and have had to be bailed out over the last 20 years compared to EU members? Not one US state has declared itself bankrupt as I recall but in the EU Greece has gone bankrupt since joining the Euro and has needed bailing out, not once but twice. Rep of Ireland, Portugal and Cyprus have also needed bailing out since joining the Euro. The Euro is a failed economic model in the EU and the evidence is plain to see. " The continent of Africa cannot be compared to a single country like China. There are 1.3bn people in Africa living in different countries with different policies and priorities and several areas of conflict. China is a unified state of 1.4bn people with a command economy using it's entire resource to achieve specific goals. Even mathematically the average GDP per capita of the African continent is $1800 whereas China is $8800. Do you really not understand the difference? You are just plain wrong on multiple levels. Again. Your continual attempts to reflect back what I tell you as a rhetorical device would be excellent but for the fact that you fail completely to even understand what the point under discussion is. You don't understand the logic well enough to apply it. The Euro or the EU? What are you choosing to discuss today? Just for the record, US states cannot legally declare bankruptcy but historically a few have defaulted on debt. The reality is that Federal government regularly transfers hundreds of billions of dollars of debt from states. However the mechanisms to force budgetary prudence are not enforced. I don't know if they even exist. The EU follows it's rules and the ECB and IMF impose spending discipline in order to access emergency funding. The money is not free of conditions. That seems far more sensible to me. Not to you? Is the US federal system a failed economic model? After all it is trillions of dollars in debt and government is being more and more regularly shutdown. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"sure.... lets take africa as an example.... you could add up all the economies of every single country in africa.... and it would still be smaller than the economy of france..... so lets then take france.... and add 26 other european countries to the mix.... now... if i were a business, i know where i would be looking at being my biggest priority...... that is the reality of what you are talking about If you're referring to Brexit with this then Africa isn't really the priority, although it's still good to have free trade with Africa to help them out of poverty. As pointed to in earlier comments the priorities for trade after Brexit should be with America and Asia. 1) how benevalant of you to help those poor african countries... nothing to do with the british empire taking advantage of their natural resources in the first place...... 2) since we have a fair idea of what the US want... https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/politics/850305 how much of that lot are you willing to give up for your super duper us trade deal......... " I love it when people blame the British Empire for all Africa's faults. Yes we have done some horrible things and the then British Empire has dirty hands but have you had a closer look at the African history and mass genocide that went on before and goes on long after we left. How many times have the Banks and UN written off debt only to get deeper into debt. People in some parts of Africa still do not have clean water. But that's the British Empires fault. People in Africa are still starving by the masses. But that's the British Empires fault. I am thinking of a word that could describe you. It starts with R and ends in acist. Stop playing the victim and go help. Don't whinge and moan do something instead of blaming everyone else. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"sure.... lets take africa as an example.... you could add up all the economies of every single country in africa.... and it would still be smaller than the economy of france..... so lets then take france.... and add 26 other european countries to the mix.... now... if i were a business, i know where i would be looking at being my biggest priority...... that is the reality of what you are talking about If you're referring to Brexit with this then Africa isn't really the priority, although it's still good to have free trade with Africa to help them out of poverty. As pointed to in earlier comments the priorities for trade after Brexit should be with America and Asia. 1) how benevalant of you to help those poor african countries... nothing to do with the british empire taking advantage of their natural resources in the first place...... 2) since we have a fair idea of what the US want... https://www.fabswingers.com/forum/politics/850305 how much of that lot are you willing to give up for your super duper us trade deal......... I love it when people blame the British Empire for all Africa's faults. Yes we have done some horrible things and the then British Empire has dirty hands but have you had a closer look at the African history and mass genocide that went on before and goes on long after we left. How many times have the Banks and UN written off debt only to get deeper into debt. People in some parts of Africa still do not have clean water. But that's the British Empires fault. People in Africa are still starving by the masses. But that's the British Empires fault. I am thinking of a word that could describe you. It starts with R and ends in acist. Stop playing the victim and go help. Don't whinge and moan do something instead of blaming everyone else. " European powers have carried out wars and genocide too. Nobody's saying that Africans are all peace loving pacifists. However, what the British empire and other European powers did do very efficiently was leave almost every country divided along religious, ethnic or tribal lines guaranteeing unstable states to be easily influenced by their former occupiers. Have most African states helped themselves? No, but neither has the intervention of external actors for geopolitical or reasons or the exploration of natural resources. The legacy of Empire has a very long tail. You could apply the last few paragraphs to the Brexiteer view of the EU. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Figures out today show the UK economy contracted in December. Growth for the quarter down to just 0.2% I’d be wary of mocking any country when the UK is in such a perilous position." The most alarming bit was that manufacturing had contracted by 0.4%...... Be interesting to see what the party lines are from the usual suspects | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well, applying the logic of the Brexiteers, we’re looking at the imminent failure of poundland and the collapse of civilisation as we know it." I thought that happened on June 24th 2016? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. " I am disappointed that a centy "lie" got past me without calling it out... so i apologise it has taken me 6 days to do so.... that last line about the UK situation being better than france and germany... not true... Germany's forecast rate for 18/19 is 1.5%..... France's forecast rate for 18/19 is 1.4%.... UK's forecast rate for 18/19 is now 1.2%.... he was right about it... but then again centy is quite a fan of the right-wing regime so i don't thing he can really be "popping his collar"...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"'Enjoy' Nothing to enjoy about others' misfortunes, as Sara and others here have posted. I find that distasteful and lacking in respect for every person that's potentially closer to becoming destitute, homeless etc. It would still not be a reason to justify leaving the EU, especially when the UK isn't currently swamped with trade deals that will be a shadow of what the UK in the EU has delivered for everyone. I sometimes sense that many see the EU as 'them', rather than 'us'. The EU being what we have helped to succesfully establish and enable, as well as gain enormous benefit from. Donald Tusk said the same thing the other week and rightly or wrongly most Brits do see them as them.I see us as Brits the French as French,the Germans as Germans etc Oddly most Brextremists seem to think of themselves as English and conveniently forget the other constituent parts of the Union" There are brexiteers in all four of the home nations | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why Are We Pleased With Others' Misfortune? From Psychology Today: It is not enough to succeed; others must fail. (Gore Vidal) Malice is like a game of poker or tennis; you don't play it with anyone who is manifestly inferior to you. (Hilde Spiel) The emotion of pleasure-in-others'-misfortune (Schadenfreude in German) is generally regarded as morally evil. It is often considered to be less acceptable than envy, which is regarded as a deadly sin. It would appear to be morally more perverse to be pleased with another person's misfortune than to be displeased with another person's good fortune. Indeed Arthur Schopenhauer argues that to feel envy is human, but to enjoy other people's misfortune is diabolical. For Schopenhauer, pleasure-in-others'-misfortune is the worst trait in human nature since it is closely related to cruelty. I believe that once we understand better this emotion, it becomes more natural and acceptable. This.. I totally get that the majority who voted leave did so on a sincere belief and a wish that we will in doing so prosper.. I fail to see the logic with those who delight in the possible misfortune of others, who relish the possibility that the EU will fail.. Regardless of the knock on effect of such a thing, there's something of a sickness in the taking pleasure of that.. I dont think the majority of leavers want to see the eu fail but you will always get extremists in any walk of life." Would you be counting Centy as an extremist then? Has he not said on more than one occasion that he wants the EU to fail? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With the britex thing etc..there is no way the Germans will slip into recession...they will fiddle the figures...whatever happens" What's that based on? Germany has been in recession before. You're really just making things up because it seems right to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. I am disappointed that a centy "lie" got past me without calling it out... so i apologise it has taken me 6 days to do so.... that last line about the UK situation being better than france and germany... not true... Germany's forecast rate for 18/19 is 1.5%..... France's forecast rate for 18/19 is 1.4%.... UK's forecast rate for 18/19 is now 1.2%.... he was right about it... but then again centy is quite a fan of the right-wing regime so i don't thing he can really be "popping his collar"...... " Actually the IMF in their latest WEO report downgraded Germany by 0.6% to 1.3% growth, and forecast Italy 0.6%, France 1.5%, Japan 1.1% and put UK at 1.5%. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy." Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works?" The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. " Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. " We lent money to Ireland with interest.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. " It's been widely reported in the Press that Ireland's Leo Varadker will be going to Brussels with his begging bowl out if there is a no deal Brexit. We're not talking years, this will be within a few weeks/months. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... and on que this morning the Bank of England slash the project economic growth forecast for this year from 1.7% to 1.2%........ and warned of negative economic growth if a no deal brexit goes through The other interesting nugget that came out this morning is that the uk economy is doing 1.5% of gdp less well than the original forecast after the vote So we're doing better than Italy who are already in recession and better than Germany and France who are tipping into recession. Glad to see Mark Carney admit it. I am disappointed that a centy "lie" got past me without calling it out... so i apologise it has taken me 6 days to do so.... that last line about the UK situation being better than france and germany... not true... Germany's forecast rate for 18/19 is 1.5%..... France's forecast rate for 18/19 is 1.4%.... UK's forecast rate for 18/19 is now 1.2%.... he was right about it... but then again centy is quite a fan of the right-wing regime so i don't thing he can really be "popping his collar"...... Actually the IMF in their latest WEO report downgraded Germany by 0.6% to 1.3% growth, and forecast Italy 0.6%, France 1.5%, Japan 1.1% and put UK at 1.5%." So it only took Fabio's comment 10 hours to be blown out of the water then. Kind of makes his '6 days' jibe look a bit silly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. " Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. " We're in the IMF, so yes we are. The point is that we benefit long term from our nearest neighbours being stable and becoming wealthier. No different to one of the regions of the UK. Long term that is exactly what has happened. You have demonstrated a selfish mindset in everything that you say and do and an inability and unwillingness to acknowledge that helping someone else in the short term may well help you considerably in the long term. It's not a way of thinking that you seem to understand let alone subscribe to so there seems little point in discussing it further. #Brexitselfish | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF." Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from." So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining..." Not even slightly. Joining an organisation as complicated as the EU takes time for integration. Leaving something that we have been part of for forty years has a very immediate effect. Again, as I said, that's sovereignty. They screwed up (as did we) and had to take responsibility for it. The EU isn't a cure all. Did they receive EU support as well? What's your actual point? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining... Not even slightly. Joining an organisation as complicated as the EU takes time for integration. Leaving something that we have been part of for forty years has a very immediate effect. Again, as I said, that's sovereignty. They screwed up (as did we) and had to take responsibility for it. The EU isn't a cure all. Did they receive EU support as well? What's your actual point?" It wasn't so complicated in 1973...but how long do you think it takes to integrate? And what immediate effect do you think we will see for leaving the EU? The same impact we were told would happen simply for voting to leave? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining... Not even slightly. Joining an organisation as complicated as the EU takes time for integration. Leaving something that we have been part of for forty years has a very immediate effect. Again, as I said, that's sovereignty. They screwed up (as did we) and had to take responsibility for it. The EU isn't a cure all. Did they receive EU support as well? What's your actual point? It wasn't so complicated in 1973...but how long do you think it takes to integrate? And what immediate effect do you think we will see for leaving the EU? The same impact we were told would happen simply for voting to leave?" Cause and effect. Going to the IMF was not a consequence of joining the EEC. Perhaps you could explain how? Perhaps you could explain if joining the EEC was driven in part by the fact that we were failing as a country and needed to join the organisation on our doorstep that was outstripping us economically. You have accused me again and again of asking questions and not answering any. No response on sovereignty? Just going to skip that and find another topic? Immediate effect of leaving the EU will be a loss of frictionless trade. Unless of course we do what Daniel Hannan suggested and remain in the EEA. That will reduce business and trade and lead to a fall in GDP as it is already doing. Fewer orders, less investment. Over time investment is further run down. We won't be a European headquarters anymore so less staff needed. Outside the EU why invest in a country outside a large market when you could do so inside it? Any more questions? Any plans to answer any? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. We're in the IMF, so yes we are. The point is that we benefit long term from our nearest neighbours being stable and becoming wealthier. No different to one of the regions of the UK. Long term that is exactly what has happened. You have demonstrated a selfish mindset in everything that you say and do and an inability and unwillingness to acknowledge that helping someone else in the short term may well help you considerably in the long term. It's not a way of thinking that you seem to understand let alone subscribe to so there seems little point in discussing it further. #Brexitselfish " Is it selfish to respect democracy or to want democracy to be respected? I don't think so. Democracy is the very polar opposite of being selfish, you put your own personal opinions to the vote, and majority vote wins the day. It's selfish if you lose that vote but still want your own way which is your position. Leave won the referendum, that's not selfishness, that's called democracy and respecting majority vote. It is selfish to hold a political party to account on manifesto promises they've made? I don't think so. Again its democracy not selfishness. I voted Conservative in the 2017 general election based on their manifesto promises to respect the result of the EU referendum, and their manifesto promise to leave the single market and their manifesto promise to leave the customs union. The Conservative party won the largest number of MP's based on that manifesto in 2017. Again its not selfishness to want the result of the general election to be respected, and for a manifesto to be respected that's called democracy. #Remainselfish #Brexitdemocracy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining... Not even slightly. Joining an organisation as complicated as the EU takes time for integration. Leaving something that we have been part of for forty years has a very immediate effect. Again, as I said, that's sovereignty. They screwed up (as did we) and had to take responsibility for it. The EU isn't a cure all. Did they receive EU support as well? What's your actual point? It wasn't so complicated in 1973...but how long do you think it takes to integrate? And what immediate effect do you think we will see for leaving the EU? The same impact we were told would happen simply for voting to leave? Cause and effect. Going to the IMF was not a consequence of joining the EEC. Perhaps you could explain how? Perhaps you could explain if joining the EEC was driven in part by the fact that we were failing as a country and needed to join the organisation on our doorstep that was outstripping us economically. You have accused me again and again of asking questions and not answering any. No response on sovereignty? Just going to skip that and find another topic? Immediate effect of leaving the EU will be a loss of frictionless trade. Unless of course we do what Daniel Hannan suggested and remain in the EEA. That will reduce business and trade and lead to a fall in GDP as it is already doing. Fewer orders, less investment. Over time investment is further run down. We won't be a European headquarters anymore so less staff needed. Outside the EU why invest in a country outside a large market when you could do so inside it? Any more questions? Any plans to answer any?" Again your summary just doesn't add up with what has happened in the real world. Ford took manufacturing out of the UK/EU in 2012/13, we were a full member of the EU, full access to the Single market and the customs union, full access to free movement and all the other things you consider to be a benefit of the EU, and yet Ford still left the UK/EU when they closed their Transit van factory in Southampton and moved it out of the EU to Turkey. Turkey are not in the EU. The EU even gave Ford a loan to help them on their way out of the EU. Business, Jobs and investment going out of the EU, and the EU paid to help Business, jobs and investment move elsewhere. #EUwin or #Turkeywin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. We're in the IMF, so yes we are. The point is that we benefit long term from our nearest neighbours being stable and becoming wealthier. No different to one of the regions of the UK. Long term that is exactly what has happened. You have demonstrated a selfish mindset in everything that you say and do and an inability and unwillingness to acknowledge that helping someone else in the short term may well help you considerably in the long term. It's not a way of thinking that you seem to understand let alone subscribe to so there seems little point in discussing it further. #Brexitselfish Is it selfish to respect democracy or to want democracy to be respected? I don't think so. Democracy is the very polar opposite of being selfish, you put your own personal opinions to the vote, and majority vote wins the day. It's selfish if you lose that vote but still want your own way which is your position. Leave won the referendum, that's not selfishness, that's called democracy and respecting majority vote. It is selfish to hold a political party to account on manifesto promises they've made? I don't think so. Again its democracy not selfishness. I voted Conservative in the 2017 general election based on their manifesto promises to respect the result of the EU referendum, and their manifesto promise to leave the single market and their manifesto promise to leave the customs union. The Conservative party won the largest number of MP's based on that manifesto in 2017. Again its not selfishness to want the result of the general election to be respected, and for a manifesto to be respected that's called democracy. #Remainselfish #Brexitdemocracy " I didn't expect a coherent answer from you and you have delivered. Your entire argument is selfish. You see no benefit in cooperation. That's it. You think that "being in control" is more important than coming to agreements, making compromises and benefitting the largest number of people. Democracy is not in question, but it's a rambling "argument" that you keep trying to bring up when all else fails. You do not understand democracy. You demonstrate that again and again in this forum. The manifesto promises of general elections throughout history are not kept because the promises and lies meet with reality and cannot be delivered. That is what is happening with Brexit. Still unable to come up with anything original and incorrectly trying to reflect back what I right #NoBrexitunicorn | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining... Not even slightly. Joining an organisation as complicated as the EU takes time for integration. Leaving something that we have been part of for forty years has a very immediate effect. Again, as I said, that's sovereignty. They screwed up (as did we) and had to take responsibility for it. The EU isn't a cure all. Did they receive EU support as well? What's your actual point? It wasn't so complicated in 1973...but how long do you think it takes to integrate? And what immediate effect do you think we will see for leaving the EU? The same impact we were told would happen simply for voting to leave? Cause and effect. Going to the IMF was not a consequence of joining the EEC. Perhaps you could explain how? Perhaps you could explain if joining the EEC was driven in part by the fact that we were failing as a country and needed to join the organisation on our doorstep that was outstripping us economically. You have accused me again and again of asking questions and not answering any. No response on sovereignty? Just going to skip that and find another topic? Immediate effect of leaving the EU will be a loss of frictionless trade. Unless of course we do what Daniel Hannan suggested and remain in the EEA. That will reduce business and trade and lead to a fall in GDP as it is already doing. Fewer orders, less investment. Over time investment is further run down. We won't be a European headquarters anymore so less staff needed. Outside the EU why invest in a country outside a large market when you could do so inside it? Any more questions? Any plans to answer any? Again your summary just doesn't add up with what has happened in the real world. Ford took manufacturing out of the UK/EU in 2012/13, we were a full member of the EU, full access to the Single market and the customs union, full access to free movement and all the other things you consider to be a benefit of the EU, and yet Ford still left the UK/EU when they closed their Transit van factory in Southampton and moved it out of the EU to Turkey. Turkey are not in the EU. The EU even gave Ford a loan to help them on their way out of the EU. Business, Jobs and investment going out of the EU, and the EU paid to help Business, jobs and investment move elsewhere. #EUwin or #Turkeywin" If you tell a lie and are proved wrong, keep telling it eh? Ford received £450 million from the same organisation but it moved to turkey for £150 million? I don't think so. JLR just built a factory in Slovakia. The logic of the move is cost. Turkey has a lower costs and an FTA with the EU. Transit van costs will now go up. #Brexiteconomicilliteracy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. We're in the IMF, so yes we are. The point is that we benefit long term from our nearest neighbours being stable and becoming wealthier. No different to one of the regions of the UK. Long term that is exactly what has happened. You have demonstrated a selfish mindset in everything that you say and do and an inability and unwillingness to acknowledge that helping someone else in the short term may well help you considerably in the long term. It's not a way of thinking that you seem to understand let alone subscribe to so there seems little point in discussing it further. #Brexitselfish Is it selfish to respect democracy or to want democracy to be respected? I don't think so. Democracy is the very polar opposite of being selfish, you put your own personal opinions to the vote, and majority vote wins the day. It's selfish if you lose that vote but still want your own way which is your position. Leave won the referendum, that's not selfishness, that's called democracy and respecting majority vote. It is selfish to hold a political party to account on manifesto promises they've made? I don't think so. Again its democracy not selfishness. I voted Conservative in the 2017 general election based on their manifesto promises to respect the result of the EU referendum, and their manifesto promise to leave the single market and their manifesto promise to leave the customs union. The Conservative party won the largest number of MP's based on that manifesto in 2017. Again its not selfishness to want the result of the general election to be respected, and for a manifesto to be respected that's called democracy. #Remainselfish #Brexitdemocracy I didn't expect a coherent answer from you and you have delivered. Your entire argument is selfish. You see no benefit in cooperation. That's it. You think that "being in control" is more important than coming to agreements, making compromises and benefitting the largest number of people. Democracy is not in question, but it's a rambling "argument" that you keep trying to bring up when all else fails. You do not understand democracy. You demonstrate that again and again in this forum. The manifesto promises of general elections throughout history are not kept because the promises and lies meet with reality and cannot be delivered. That is what is happening with Brexit. Still unable to come up with anything original and incorrectly trying to reflect back what I right #NoBrexitunicorn " Yet more nonsense from you. Everything I say does not point to non cooperation with others as I'm very happy for the UK to be in Nato and remain a member of Nato. I'm very happy for the UK to be in the UN and to remain in the UN. I just don't want to be in the failing, crumbling EU and want the democratic vote to leave to be respected and implemented. You want to remain in the EU even though you lost a public vote on it, your opinion is the very epitome of selfishness. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining... Not even slightly. Joining an organisation as complicated as the EU takes time for integration. Leaving something that we have been part of for forty years has a very immediate effect. Again, as I said, that's sovereignty. They screwed up (as did we) and had to take responsibility for it. The EU isn't a cure all. Did they receive EU support as well? What's your actual point? It wasn't so complicated in 1973...but how long do you think it takes to integrate? And what immediate effect do you think we will see for leaving the EU? The same impact we were told would happen simply for voting to leave? Cause and effect. Going to the IMF was not a consequence of joining the EEC. Perhaps you could explain how? Perhaps you could explain if joining the EEC was driven in part by the fact that we were failing as a country and needed to join the organisation on our doorstep that was outstripping us economically. You have accused me again and again of asking questions and not answering any. No response on sovereignty? Just going to skip that and find another topic? Immediate effect of leaving the EU will be a loss of frictionless trade. Unless of course we do what Daniel Hannan suggested and remain in the EEA. That will reduce business and trade and lead to a fall in GDP as it is already doing. Fewer orders, less investment. Over time investment is further run down. We won't be a European headquarters anymore so less staff needed. Outside the EU why invest in a country outside a large market when you could do so inside it? Any more questions? Any plans to answer any? Again your summary just doesn't add up with what has happened in the real world. Ford took manufacturing out of the UK/EU in 2012/13, we were a full member of the EU, full access to the Single market and the customs union, full access to free movement and all the other things you consider to be a benefit of the EU, and yet Ford still left the UK/EU when they closed their Transit van factory in Southampton and moved it out of the EU to Turkey. Turkey are not in the EU. The EU even gave Ford a loan to help them on their way out of the EU. Business, Jobs and investment going out of the EU, and the EU paid to help Business, jobs and investment move elsewhere. #EUwin or #Turkeywin If you tell a lie and are proved wrong, keep telling it eh? Ford received £450 million from the same organisation but it moved to turkey for £150 million? I don't think so. JLR just built a factory in Slovakia. The logic of the move is cost. Turkey has a lower costs and an FTA with the EU. Transit van costs will now go up. #Brexiteconomicilliteracy " There are no lies in what I said. Turkey are not in the EU, they don't have any Turkish MEP's in the European Parliament. If you're in any doubt about it just watch part 3 of Europe 10 years in turmoil on BBC iplayer about the migration crisis a significant amount of the programme was about Turkey not being in the EU. You think the EU is this brilliant thing that attracts Business, jobs and Investment but the Ford/Turkey example points the the complete opposite. #EUlose #Turkeywin | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. " I know you love to lie and twist facts to suit but when will you ever learn that the bullshit you spout is so easy to "fact check" if we didn't already know it was bullshit Centy.... https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36456277 You try and make out billions of UK tax payers cash has been spent never to get back on bailouts which is just straight forward lies or you're really that uneducated on the subject you are unable to do better. The most common term for this bailout bollocks like most things Brexit is Brexit bullshit profect lie, tell the same lies long enough the public will probably start to believe it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. Better to work in a cooperative of nations than the humiliation of going begging to the IMF. We have done it before and I would imagine that post Brexit plus about 5 years - we may well be there again. Yes, we did have to go to the IMF. We actually got the largest loan from the IMF that had ever been asked for. I remember it. Dennis Healey was the chancellor. It was 1976. Over 3 years after we joined the EU (then the EEC). Greece, Ireland, Latvia, Poland, Romania are some other countries that have 'gone begging to the IMF despite being in that 'cooperative of nations' you mention it's better being in than going begging to the IMF. Three years after joining. You actually believe that that financial crisis wasn't due to decades of mismanagement in the run-up to joining the EEC? That somehow in that time when processes were still being in place everything would be magically fixed? You want a unicorn for everything it seems. Also, for clarity, the fact that countries are able to royally screw up their own economies makes it abundantly clear that they have plenty of sovereignty. They at least then have the benefit of a safety net to catch them and a big domestic market that is not in trouble to continue to buy and sell from. So by your logic then, anything that happens to the economy, good or bad, has nothing to do with us leaving. And the other countries that went cap in hand to the IMF were more than 3 years after them joining... Not even slightly. Joining an organisation as complicated as the EU takes time for integration. Leaving something that we have been part of for forty years has a very immediate effect. Again, as I said, that's sovereignty. They screwed up (as did we) and had to take responsibility for it. The EU isn't a cure all. Did they receive EU support as well? What's your actual point? It wasn't so complicated in 1973...but how long do you think it takes to integrate? And what immediate effect do you think we will see for leaving the EU? The same impact we were told would happen simply for voting to leave? Cause and effect. Going to the IMF was not a consequence of joining the EEC. Perhaps you could explain how? Perhaps you could explain if joining the EEC was driven in part by the fact that we were failing as a country and needed to join the organisation on our doorstep that was outstripping us economically. You have accused me again and again of asking questions and not answering any. No response on sovereignty? Just going to skip that and find another topic? Immediate effect of leaving the EU will be a loss of frictionless trade. Unless of course we do what Daniel Hannan suggested and remain in the EEA. That will reduce business and trade and lead to a fall in GDP as it is already doing. Fewer orders, less investment. Over time investment is further run down. We won't be a European headquarters anymore so less staff needed. Outside the EU why invest in a country outside a large market when you could do so inside it? Any more questions? Any plans to answer any? Again your summary just doesn't add up with what has happened in the real world. Ford took manufacturing out of the UK/EU in 2012/13, we were a full member of the EU, full access to the Single market and the customs union, full access to free movement and all the other things you consider to be a benefit of the EU, and yet Ford still left the UK/EU when they closed their Transit van factory in Southampton and moved it out of the EU to Turkey. Turkey are not in the EU. The EU even gave Ford a loan to help them on their way out of the EU. Business, Jobs and investment going out of the EU, and the EU paid to help Business, jobs and investment move elsewhere. #EUwin or #Turkeywin If you tell a lie and are proved wrong, keep telling it eh? Ford received £450 million from the same organisation but it moved to turkey for £150 million? I don't think so. JLR just built a factory in Slovakia. The logic of the move is cost. Turkey has a lower costs and an FTA with the EU. Transit van costs will now go up. #Brexiteconomicilliteracy There are no lies in what I said. Turkey are not in the EU, they don't have any Turkish MEP's in the European Parliament. If you're in any doubt about it just watch part 3 of Europe 10 years in turmoil on BBC iplayer about the migration crisis a significant amount of the programme was about Turkey not being in the EU. You think the EU is this brilliant thing that attracts Business, jobs and Investment but the Ford/Turkey example points the the complete opposite. #EUlose #Turkeywin " Your entire post was about the European Investment Bank giving money to Ford to move the Transit plant to Turkey. Lie. Turkey has a limited customs union with the EU in which they accept all EU regulations but no tariffs on certain goods. You have no idea about the subject you're arguing about. Do you even know what point you're trying to make? #Brexiteconomicilliteracy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy. Do you actually think that Eurozone economic growth contracting in isolation? So is the UK, China, Japan and the USA. What is your actual point? That we should have nothing to do with any country in a downward growth cycle? Should we "opt out" of the next global recession? So you think that's how the world actually works? The point the poster was making was very clear. Maybe you missed the bit which said... "Do we have to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out". Membership of the EU comes with responsibilities like bailing out other member states when they get into financial difficulties, as happened with Greece, Portugal and Rep. of Ireland when other EU member states were asked to chip in and stump up the cash to bail them out. Even though the UK is not in the Euro the EU still asked the UK for wads of UK taxpayers cash. You listed China, USA and Japan, we're not expected to help to bail those countries out and they wouldn't ask us to either. That is how the world outside of the EU actually works. We're in the IMF, so yes we are. The point is that we benefit long term from our nearest neighbours being stable and becoming wealthier. No different to one of the regions of the UK. Long term that is exactly what has happened. You have demonstrated a selfish mindset in everything that you say and do and an inability and unwillingness to acknowledge that helping someone else in the short term may well help you considerably in the long term. It's not a way of thinking that you seem to understand let alone subscribe to so there seems little point in discussing it further. #Brexitselfish Is it selfish to respect democracy or to want democracy to be respected? I don't think so. Democracy is the very polar opposite of being selfish, you put your own personal opinions to the vote, and majority vote wins the day. It's selfish if you lose that vote but still want your own way which is your position. Leave won the referendum, that's not selfishness, that's called democracy and respecting majority vote. It is selfish to hold a political party to account on manifesto promises they've made? I don't think so. Again its democracy not selfishness. I voted Conservative in the 2017 general election based on their manifesto promises to respect the result of the EU referendum, and their manifesto promise to leave the single market and their manifesto promise to leave the customs union. The Conservative party won the largest number of MP's based on that manifesto in 2017. Again its not selfishness to want the result of the general election to be respected, and for a manifesto to be respected that's called democracy. #Remainselfish #Brexitdemocracy I didn't expect a coherent answer from you and you have delivered. Your entire argument is selfish. You see no benefit in cooperation. That's it. You think that "being in control" is more important than coming to agreements, making compromises and benefitting the largest number of people. Democracy is not in question, but it's a rambling "argument" that you keep trying to bring up when all else fails. You do not understand democracy. You demonstrate that again and again in this forum. The manifesto promises of general elections throughout history are not kept because the promises and lies meet with reality and cannot be delivered. That is what is happening with Brexit. Still unable to come up with anything original and incorrectly trying to reflect back what I right #NoBrexitunicorn Yet more nonsense from you. Everything I say does not point to non cooperation with others as I'm very happy for the UK to be in Nato and remain a member of Nato. I'm very happy for the UK to be in the UN and to remain in the UN. I just don't want to be in the failing, crumbling EU and want the democratic vote to leave to be respected and implemented. You want to remain in the EU even though you lost a public vote on it, your opinion is the very epitome of selfishness. " ...and if there is another vote after finding out the reality of the situation and people vote to remain then you think that's undemocratic. Yesterday's vote is more valid than today's? Then homosexuality and abortion would still be illegal. Good attempt to change the discussion though. Just parroting your phrases again and again doesn't make them true. You don't want us to contribute much, if anything, to overseas aid because you are unable to see a link between fixing economic and humanitarian problems with security and immigration control which you claim to care about. This is much of the UN's work. No sovereignty there about how "our" money is spent. Not democratic. No direct elections. Hypocrite. NATO undemocratic. Spending "our" money without oversight or direct elections. Hypocrite. Your solution is put up walls and do things for your own benefit rather than engage and solve the problem at cause. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Italy is in recession and Germany is all but in recession. Still wondering why they are worried about the UK pulling out with with a no deal and not giving any money to the EU ? The Euro zone is starting to collapse. Do we net to get out faster before we have to start bailing them out ? Enjoy." It's a pity that after leaving we will be the ones with a basket case economy. But at least the EU won't have to bail us out as they will have no obligation to help any more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |