FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Facebook allow Remain Fake news ads
Facebook allow Remain Fake news ads
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
| |||
  | |||
| |||
| |||
"Yeah, I heard the same. But the leave campaign was all lies and fake. " fair point.... leave campaign failed in the appeal in the UK high court to get the findings of the Electorial Commission reversed ( thats the one saying they broke campaign rules by overspending.....) and who said the UK Courts had no power.......  | |||
| |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain" Interesting. This is an Express article on the same subject last year. Slightly different perspective. Which is fake? https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/975359/palm-oil-ban-eu-trade-war Curioser and curiouser: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/palm-oil-malaysia-arms-deal-eurofighter-typhoon-biofuel-biodiesel-a8342211.html | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain" ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice  | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Who believes anything on Facebook its full of shit " I've seen a lot of people repost so some must or they are deliberately spread in lies. This has mainly been about immigration from the leave side. I never saw the post mentioned in the OP. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice "To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign. | |||
"Centy I really thing you should check out other new sources, everything is from the express, telegraph or migration watch. Here's an interesting break down of UK news papers ranked in order of credibility by Human Truth: The Economist Weekly newspaper in magazine format. Because most academics don't include this (or other weeklies) in their studies of newspapers, I do not have enough information to formally rate it. 1 No criticisms found in any of my sources. 1 Quality, accuracy, wide scope, realistic reporting. The Guardian @ Left-of-centre, progressive, generally pro-European, pro-welfare state, pro-civil rights, anti-monarchy.4 2 High quality5. 2 Has won Newspaper of the Year 4 times6. 1 Least amount of wire copy (Davies 2008), meaning that text and stories are manually checked and manually written more than other papers. 0 Only responsible for 9 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (6th worse in the list) [2013]8. The Independent and i Including the Independent on Sunday. @@ Generally, politically left. Cautious of official information.4. Independent print edition ceased publication in 2016 Mar but compact i continues. 2 High quality5. 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year once6. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (10th worse in the list) [2013]8. The Observer @ Slightly less left than the Independent4. 1 Quality5. 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year once6. 0 Only responsible for 7 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Financial Times @ 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year twice6. 0 Only responsible for 6 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. London Gazette @ "Official Newspaper of Record for the United Kingdom", "its content consists of legal and official announcements from HM Government, the Armed Forces, local authorities, the Established Churches, companies and private citizens"4. Morning Star @ Left wing4. The People @ 0 Only Responsible for 6 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (7th worse in the list) [2013]8. The Metro Free, London-area. Included here because of its popularity. 0 Only responsible for 6 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (8th worse in the list) [2013]8. Daily Sport Including Sunday Sport @@ "Unapologetically trashy tabloid", "almost zero news content", soft porn content4. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. Daily Telegraph Including Sunday Telegraph @@ Strongly conservative4. 2 High quality5. 2 Has won Newspaper of the Year 4 times6. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (3rd worse in the list) [2013]8. 4 Responsible for 89 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (2nd worst)7. London Evening Standard Free, London-area. Included here because of its popularity. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (8th worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 Responsible for 12 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. The Times9 Including The Sunday Times @@ Politically conservative4. 1 Quality5. 2 Has won Newspaper of the Year 3 times6. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (9th worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 A high number of successful PCC complaints (2008)10. 1 "I know Whitehall press officers now who rank the [Sunday Times] above even the cheapest red-top tabloid as a source of fabricated stories"11. -3 Responsible for 51 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Daily Mirror Including Sunday Mirror @@ "Left-wing, down-market. [...] It remains the only national newspaper to support Labour consistently". 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year once6. 1 Sensationalism4, lack of depth. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (4th worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia12 1 Responsible for 19 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Daily Star @ Sensationalism, entertainment, some soft porn, right-wing, news content is negligible13. One of the worst three tabloids. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 Worst 3 tabloids according to Jones (2004)5 1 Responsible for 18 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Daily Express Including Sunday Express @ Conservative, right-of-centre4. Britishpapers.co.uk lists this as a mid-market title. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 Worst 3 tabloids according to Jones (2004)5. 1 Singled-out as a source of hate by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights14. 2 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia specifically as he worst of all the tabloids12 4 Responsible for 75 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (4th worst)7. The Sun Including The Sun on Sunday @ Entertainment, "Sensational headlines", some soft porn, sometimes right-wing, light on news and politics, some say xenophobic and sexist4. One of the two most popular newspapers. 2 638 PCC complaints against it (2nd worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 A very high number of successful PCC complaints [2008]10. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 Worst 3 tabloids according to Jones (2004)5. 1 Corporate criminal and immoral behaviour15. 1 Singled-out as a source of hate by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights14. 1 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia12 4 Responsible for 79 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (3rd worst)7. Daily Mail Including Mail on Sunday @@ Staunchly right-wing16. Populist, rabidly conservative, anti-Europe, anti-immigration, anti-taxation, anti-abortion, anti-permissive, concocted moral outrages17. Alastair Campbell said: "It's very hard to see how we can be happy as a nation when every day two million people buy the Daily Mail"18. 4 Has won Newspaper of the Year 8 times6. 3 1,214 PCC complaints against it (top of the league by a long way, and its Sunday counterpart is 5th in the list) [2013]8. 3 Three times more successful PCC complaints against it than any other paper [2008]10. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 "Alarmist headlines", providing "daily hate" according to former owner Lord Northcliffe. "More than any other newspaper in Britain, it deals in falsehood and distortion"16. 1 Plagiarism of external press sources19. 1 Misinforming the masses of medical issues: "international journal of health scares" according to Dr Goldacre20. 1 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia12 6 Responsible for 116 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (the worst)7." None of that suggests the story in the OP is false though. Are you saying the story in the OP is false? | |||
" Note: on the Daily Express :"Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia specifically as he worst of all the tabloids" Singled-out as a source of hate by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Responsible for 75 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (4th worst)" I thought some rabid remoaner would come out with the kind of nonsense you just posted, that's why I gave 2 links in the OP to different news sources. | |||
| |||
" Note: on the Daily Express :"Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia specifically as he worst of all the tabloids" Singled-out as a source of hate by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Responsible for 75 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (4th worst) I thought some rabid remoaner would come out with the kind of nonsense you just posted, that's why I gave 2 links in the OP to different news sources. " The other paper wasn't too high on the list either in fact on another site it was rated as the least trusted broad sheet, also see the link above regarding printing erroneous stories about the EU. | |||
"Centy I really thing you should check out other new sources, everything is from the express, telegraph or migration watch. Here's an interesting break down of UK news papers ranked in order of credibility by Human Truth: The Economist Weekly newspaper in magazine format. Because most academics don't include this (or other weeklies) in their studies of newspapers, I do not have enough information to formally rate it. 1 No criticisms found in any of my sources. 1 Quality, accuracy, wide scope, realistic reporting. The Guardian @ Left-of-centre, progressive, generally pro-European, pro-welfare state, pro-civil rights, anti-monarchy.4 2 High quality5. 2 Has won Newspaper of the Year 4 times6. 1 Least amount of wire copy (Davies 2008), meaning that text and stories are manually checked and manually written more than other papers. 0 Only responsible for 9 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (6th worse in the list) [2013]8. The Independent and i Including the Independent on Sunday. @@ Generally, politically left. Cautious of official information.4. Independent print edition ceased publication in 2016 Mar but compact i continues. 2 High quality5. 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year once6. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (10th worse in the list) [2013]8. The Observer @ Slightly less left than the Independent4. 1 Quality5. 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year once6. 0 Only responsible for 7 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Financial Times @ 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year twice6. 0 Only responsible for 6 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. London Gazette @ "Official Newspaper of Record for the United Kingdom", "its content consists of legal and official announcements from HM Government, the Armed Forces, local authorities, the Established Churches, companies and private citizens"4. Morning Star @ Left wing4. The People @ 0 Only Responsible for 6 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (7th worse in the list) [2013]8. The Metro Free, London-area. Included here because of its popularity. 0 Only responsible for 6 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (8th worse in the list) [2013]8. Daily Sport Including Sunday Sport @@ "Unapologetically trashy tabloid", "almost zero news content", soft porn content4. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. Daily Telegraph Including Sunday Telegraph @@ Strongly conservative4. 2 High quality5. 2 Has won Newspaper of the Year 4 times6. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (3rd worse in the list) [2013]8. 4 Responsible for 89 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (2nd worst)7. London Evening Standard Free, London-area. Included here because of its popularity. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (8th worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 Responsible for 12 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. The Times9 Including The Sunday Times @@ Politically conservative4. 1 Quality5. 2 Has won Newspaper of the Year 3 times6. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (9th worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 A high number of successful PCC complaints (2008)10. 1 "I know Whitehall press officers now who rank the [Sunday Times] above even the cheapest red-top tabloid as a source of fabricated stories"11. -3 Responsible for 51 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Daily Mirror Including Sunday Mirror @@ "Left-wing, down-market. [...] It remains the only national newspaper to support Labour consistently". 1 Has won Newspaper of the Year once6. 1 Sensationalism4, lack of depth. 1 Many PCC complaints against it (4th worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia12 1 Responsible for 19 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Daily Star @ Sensationalism, entertainment, some soft porn, right-wing, news content is negligible13. One of the worst three tabloids. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 Worst 3 tabloids according to Jones (2004)5 1 Responsible for 18 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU7. Daily Express Including Sunday Express @ Conservative, right-of-centre4. Britishpapers.co.uk lists this as a mid-market title. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 Worst 3 tabloids according to Jones (2004)5. 1 Singled-out as a source of hate by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights14. 2 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia specifically as he worst of all the tabloids12 4 Responsible for 75 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (4th worst)7. The Sun Including The Sun on Sunday @ Entertainment, "Sensational headlines", some soft porn, sometimes right-wing, light on news and politics, some say xenophobic and sexist4. One of the two most popular newspapers. 2 638 PCC complaints against it (2nd worse in the list) [2013]8. 1 A very high number of successful PCC complaints [2008]10. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 Worst 3 tabloids according to Jones (2004)5. 1 Corporate criminal and immoral behaviour15. 1 Singled-out as a source of hate by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights14. 1 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia12 4 Responsible for 79 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (3rd worst)7. Daily Mail Including Mail on Sunday @@ Staunchly right-wing16. Populist, rabidly conservative, anti-Europe, anti-immigration, anti-taxation, anti-abortion, anti-permissive, concocted moral outrages17. Alastair Campbell said: "It's very hard to see how we can be happy as a nation when every day two million people buy the Daily Mail"18. 4 Has won Newspaper of the Year 8 times6. 3 1,214 PCC complaints against it (top of the league by a long way, and its Sunday counterpart is 5th in the list) [2013]8. 3 Three times more successful PCC complaints against it than any other paper [2008]10. 1 Sensationalism, lack of depth. 1 "Alarmist headlines", providing "daily hate" according to former owner Lord Northcliffe. "More than any other newspaper in Britain, it deals in falsehood and distortion"16. 1 Plagiarism of external press sources19. 1 Misinforming the masses of medical issues: "international journal of health scares" according to Dr Goldacre20. 1 Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia12 6 Responsible for 116 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (the worst)7. None of that suggests the story in the OP is false though. Are you saying the story in the OP is false?" I'm saying the sources you constantly use are some of the least credible in UK Journalism and you should maybe read a broader range. | |||
| |||
| |||
" Note: on the Daily Express :"Too untrustworthy to use as a reference by Wikipedia specifically as he worst of all the tabloids" Singled-out as a source of hate by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Responsible for 75 of 548 articles on false and misleading information about the EU (4th worst) I thought some rabid remoaner would come out with the kind of nonsense you just posted, that's why I gave 2 links in the OP to different news sources. " I actually do read the Daily Express from time to time as my work place get it. It's a laughable read, it usually contradicts it's self from page to page. | |||
"Is this alt reich neo nazi fake news to deflect from alt reich propaganda on social media or is this truely the work of those liberals with a degree in media studies and their fancy answers and words ...???" Maybe it's the work of the liberal Nick Clegg. He works for Facebook now doesn't he. | |||
"Is this alt reich neo nazi fake news to deflect from alt reich propaganda on social media or is this truely the work of those liberals with a degree in media studies and their fancy answers and words ...??? Maybe it's the work of the liberal Nick Clegg. He works for Facebook now doesn't he. " You not out tonight? I'm off to the pub now! | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign. "It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't  | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't "There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph. | |||
"Is this alt reich neo nazi fake news to deflect from alt reich propaganda on social media or is this truely the work of those liberals with a degree in media studies and their fancy answers and words ...??? Maybe it's the work of the liberal Nick Clegg. He works for Facebook now doesn't he. You not out tonight? I'm off to the pub now!" Yes I'm off out for a drink with friends around 10pm.  | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph. "You are correct. The Telegraph too. Interestingly they both say that they are accused of publishing fake news. The only "evidence" is Gove and Fox' "word"
Yet the earlier story from the Express contradicts what they say.
Please comment on which Express article is the fake one | |||
| |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain" Get your whataboutery in first, obviously. | |||
"Nowhere I’ve seen has said the people’s vote has used “fake news”’so anyone say 300k has been spent on fake news should back that up, of themselves are spreading porkies. Also, 90k by leave campaigns? I can see one group that has spent 95k. And another which have spent 12k. Hmmm. Fake news ? " No ? needed. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph. "Links for this!? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?"Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future. "They are impermissible as stated above! | |||
| |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!"You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer? The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread. "From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other."Facebook ad link report. Can we link to Facebook ? It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k."You can try.. I won't report you...not my style. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other."You know full well (or you should do by now) it would be against fab forum rules to post a link to the original report and it would be against fab forum rules to post a link directly to Facebook. Have you taken any paracetamol for your hangover yet? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
You can try.. I won't report you...not my style."You're really not very bright are you. You don't have to hit the report button for a moderator to see something. Moderators are often trawling the forums and reading threads without reports. Moderators post on threads and engage in discussions themselves. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
You know full well (or you should do by now) it would be against fab forum rules to post a link to the original report and it would be against fab forum rules to post a link directly to Facebook. Have you taken any paracetamol for your hangover yet? "Next you'll be telling me to stop smoking | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
You can try.. I won't report you...not my style.
You're really not very bright are you. You don't have to hit the report button for a moderator to see something. Moderators are often trawling the forums and reading threads without reports. Moderators post on threads and engage in discussions themselves. "This sounds like a confession. | |||
| |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
You can try.. I won't report you...not my style.
You're really not very bright are you. You don't have to hit the report button for a moderator to see something. Moderators are often trawling the forums and reading threads without reports. Moderators post on threads and engage in discussions themselves.
This sounds like a confession."A confession of what? It's just stating a fact that moderators often have a nosey around the forums. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
You can try.. I won't report you...not my style.
You're really not very bright are you. You don't have to hit the report button for a moderator to see something. Moderators are often trawling the forums and reading threads without reports. Moderators post on threads and engage in discussions themselves.
This sounds like a confession.
A confession of what?
It's just stating a fact that moderators often have a nosey around the forums. "No idea, just sounds defensive. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
You know full well (or you should do by now) it would be against fab forum rules to post a link to the original report and it would be against fab forum rules to post a link directly to Facebook. Have you taken any paracetamol for your hangover yet? "I’m assuming therefore you’ve taken a look at the page yourself. Any thoughts on my take ? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k."Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report. "I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google. What did you search for? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report. "That’s not my point. I can go look at all the ads in question from the Fb report. It’s the report / stats itself that I’m talking about and eddy is asking about. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report. "That's not the Facebook Report link is it though! | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report. "They aren't fake though. Both articles say that they have been accused of being fake but the "evidence" is that Gove and Fox say that they are. However, there is an Express article saying just the opposite which you have still failed to comment on. Which Express article is true and which is fake? Are you in a contradictory loop? Cannot compute?
The only fact in the article is how much money is being spent on remain advertising on Facebook with an unsupported implication that it's "fake" | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for? "You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.  | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread. "I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up."Well it came up on my Google search very easily. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily. "What did you type in? I want to try it. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it."All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP. "Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere. Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.' | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'"Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'. "Seriously if you did type what was it? The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches. This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site. "It's been 4 hours, have you found out how to make it appear on Google yet? There is a way but I'll know if you've done it? Are we to 'assume' you were lying? | |||
| |||
| |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
It's been 4 hours, have you found out how to make it appear on Google yet?
There is a way but I'll know if you've done it?
Are we to 'assume' you were lying?"I found it on Google when I posted the thread. If you want evidence read the opening post on this thread, the link is there. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
It's been 4 hours, have you found out how to make it appear on Google yet?
There is a way but I'll know if you've done it?
Are we to 'assume' you were lying?
I found it on Google when I posted the thread. If you want evidence read the opening post on this thread, the link is there. "What did you type into Google, why not just say? It'll shut me up. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
It's been 4 hours, have you found out how to make it appear on Google yet?
There is a way but I'll know if you've done it?
Are we to 'assume' you were lying?
I found it on Google when I posted the thread. If you want evidence read the opening post on this thread, the link is there.
What did you type into Google, why not just say? It'll shut me up."This is the entire article visible on this side of the pay wall. Just innuendo: "Facebook has been accused of "pumping out fake news" after running political adverts claiming endangered animals were being threatened - by Brexit. The social media giant has been paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by Britain’s two most prominent Remain campaign groups to stir up support for a second referendum. Latest figures released by the Facebook show the two organisations - People’s Vote UK and Best for Britain - spent £373,587 on Facebook ads in the run up to the parliamentary vote on Theresa May’s defeated Brexit deal. By contrast, Leave-supporting groups spent a little over £93,000, according to an analysis by the Telegraph of political income disclosed by Facebook. Although Facebook..." | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
It's been 4 hours, have you found out how to make it appear on Google yet?
There is a way but I'll know if you've done it?
Are we to 'assume' you were lying?
I found it on Google when I posted the thread. If you want evidence read the opening post on this thread, the link is there.
What did you type into Google, why not just say? It'll shut me up.
This is the entire article visible on this side of the pay wall. Just innuendo:
"Facebook has been accused of "pumping out fake news" after running political adverts claiming endangered animals were being threatened - by Brexit.
The social media giant has been paid hundreds of thousands of pounds by Britain’s two most prominent Remain campaign groups to stir up support for a second referendum.
Latest figures released by the Facebook show the two organisations - People’s Vote UK and Best for Britain - spent £373,587 on Facebook ads in the run up to the parliamentary vote on Theresa May’s defeated Brexit deal.
By contrast, Leave-supporting groups spent a little over £93,000, according to an analysis by the Telegraph of political income disclosed by Facebook.
Although Facebook...""I can see it anyway that's not what I'm getting at. It that he saying he googled it there's no meta on the source. There is a way you can make it appear in Google but you would have to already have seen the article or been extremely lucky in what you have searched for. | |||
| |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway " Thanks for your personal opinion. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway " . I can't disagree but it's called free choice and we all have the ability to log out. As I pointed out above when Angela Merkel was caught talking to mark Zuckerberg on an open mic it really is about control of the masses. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway . I can't disagree but it's called free choice and we all have the ability to log out. As I pointed out above when Angela Merkel was caught talking to mark Zuckerberg on an open mic it really is about control of the masses." | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway . I can't disagree but it's called free choice and we all have the ability to log out. As I pointed out above when Angela Merkel was caught talking to mark Zuckerberg on an open mic it really is about control of the masses. "Here's a meeting of minds! | |||
| |||
"Again, interesting detour. I would have guessed centaur found the articles through just reading the papers. Or having a news aggregator or the like. But it distracts the thread from the story or the quality of the journalism. "I'm not sure they actually publish them in actual papers seem typical online filler to me. He did actually say he Googled it though. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion." It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. " You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier." I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up. "So,what did you Google or were you lying? | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?"The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?
The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP. "Ok, I'll put you down as a liar then. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?
The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP.
Ok, I'll put you down as a liar then."It's even more amusing that you actually think I give a shit what you think about me. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?
The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP.
Ok, I'll put you down as a liar then.
It's even more amusing that you actually think I give a shit what you think about me. "If you don't answer then others too must question your credibility. The fact you tried to let this thread die for 4hrs when I asked for earlier tells me all I need to know. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?
The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP.
Ok, I'll put you down as a liar then.
It's even more amusing that you actually think I give a shit what you think about me.
If you don't answer then others too must question your credibility. The fact you tried to let this thread die for 4hrs when I asked for earlier tells me all I need to know."Those 4 hours I was missing is that thing people call a social life again. | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?
The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP.
Ok, I'll put you down as a liar then.
It's even more amusing that you actually think I give a shit what you think about me.
If you don't answer then others too must question your credibility. The fact you tried to let this thread die for 4hrs when I asked for earlier tells me all I need to know.
Those 4 hours I was missing is that thing people call a social life again. "You were posting on other threads so not an argument | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?
The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP.
Ok, I'll put you down as a liar then.
It's even more amusing that you actually think I give a shit what you think about me.
If you don't answer then others too must question your credibility. The fact you tried to let this thread die for 4hrs when I asked for earlier tells me all I need to know.
Those 4 hours I was missing is that thing people call a social life again.
You were posting on other threads so not an argument
No I wasn't. I was out a didn't post on any threads.
The times are above and you can compare them to the other thread I linked my post was 12hrs ago you posted on another link 11 hrs ago."Not sure how good you are at maths but 11 hours ago minus 4 out hours out still leaves 7 hours to spare | |||
"I think facebook should be closed down it is a discusting site anyway Thanks for your personal opinion. It's a public forum so personal opinions are very welcome. If you don't like it you're free to take those kind of childish sarcastic comments elsewhere. You got what you googled yet or are we putting you down as a liar? Also is ok for you to do pretty similar things to me questioning my reasoning implying I was d*unk. I don't think it ended well for you. Look at Emma's post on the other thread 'is this true' it'll give you an indication of how stupid she was earlier. I've already posted on the other thread after Emma, slow coach. Do try to keep up.
So,what did you Google or were you lying?
The more you ask the less inclined I am to say to be perfectly honest. The fact is I found it on Google and that's how I managed to post the link on the OP.
Ok, I'll put you down as a liar then.
It's even more amusing that you actually think I give a shit what you think about me.
If you don't answer then others too must question your credibility. The fact you tried to let this thread die for 4hrs when I asked for earlier tells me all I need to know.
Those 4 hours I was missing is that thing people call a social life again.
You were posting on other threads so not an argument
No I wasn't. I was out a didn't post on any threads.
The times are above and you can compare them to the other thread I linked my post was 12hrs ago you posted on another link 11 hrs ago.
Not sure how good you are at maths but 11 hours ago minus 4 out hours out still leaves 7 hours to spare "By Eddie1984aFind posts by Eddie1984a Man 12 hours ago Penrith "Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign. It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph. Links for this!? Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future. They are impermissible as stated above! You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer? The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread. From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other. Facebook ad link report. Can we link to Facebook ? It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k. Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report. I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google. What did you search for? You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread. I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up. Well it came up on my Google search very easily. What did you type in? I want to try it. All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP. Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere. Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.' Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'. " Seriously if you did type what was it? The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches. This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site. Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list Report report By Eddie1984aFind posts by Eddie1984a Man 8 hours ago Penrith "Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign. It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph. Links for this!? Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future. They are impermissible as stated above! You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer? The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread. From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other. Facebook ad link report. Can we link to Facebook ? It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k. Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report. I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google. What did you search for? You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread. I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up. Well it came up on my Google search very easily. What did you type in? I want to try it. All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP. Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere. Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.' Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'. Seriously if you did type what was it? The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches. This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site. " It's been 4 hours, have you found out how to make it appear on Google yet? There is a way but I'll know if you've done it? Are we to 'assume' you were lying? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said"I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator. "Explain how I am way out? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator. "12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago. I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life. I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life. Do you understand now? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator.
12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago.
I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life.
I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life.
Do you understand now?"I went out at around 6pm for 4 hours so got back home around 10pm. That was 7 hours ago, not 11 hours. I didn't post on here between 6pm and 10pm. I just explained to you in an earlier post your 11 hours ago minus 4 hours out still left 7 hours to spare! You're making yourself look very foolish here. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator.
12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago.
I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life.
I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life.
Do you understand now?
I went out at around 6pm for 4 hours so got back home around 10pm. That was 7 hours ago, not 11 hours. I didn't post on here between 6pm and 10pm. I just explained to you in an earlier post your 11 hours ago minus 4 hours out still left 7 hours to spare! You're making yourself look very foolish here. "No,because the period you let the thread die was 12 hrs ago....can you not read? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator.
12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago.
I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life.
I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life.
Do you understand now?
I went out at around 6pm for 4 hours so got back home around 10pm. That was 7 hours ago, not 11 hours. I didn't post on here between 6pm and 10pm. I just explained to you in an earlier post your 11 hours ago minus 4 hours out still left 7 hours to spare! You're making yourself look very foolish here.
No,because the period you let the thread die was 12 hrs ago....can you not read?"So you weren't out in the period I was talking about...you just didn't reply? | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator.
12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago.
I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life.
I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life.
Do you understand now?
I went out at around 6pm for 4 hours so got back home around 10pm. That was 7 hours ago, not 11 hours. I didn't post on here between 6pm and 10pm. I just explained to you in an earlier post your 11 hours ago minus 4 hours out still left 7 hours to spare! You're making yourself look very foolish here.
No,because the period you let the thread die was 12 hrs ago....can you not read?"FFS I just gave you the exact times I was out. It was 7 hours ago, not 11 or 12. You can't read let alone add or subtract. I'm done arguing over petty points with you anyway, got work in the morning. Oh and thanks for constantly bumping my thread about Remain Fake news on Facebook to the top of the forum all day. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator.
12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago.
I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life.
I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life.
Do you understand now?
I went out at around 6pm for 4 hours so got back home around 10pm. That was 7 hours ago, not 11 hours. I didn't post on here between 6pm and 10pm. I just explained to you in an earlier post your 11 hours ago minus 4 hours out still left 7 hours to spare! You're making yourself look very foolish here.
No,because the period you let the thread die was 12 hrs ago....can you not read?
FFS I just gave you the exact times I was out. It was 7 hours ago, not 11 or 12. You can't read let alone add or subtract. I'm done arguing over petty points with you anyway, got work in the morning. Oh and thanks for constantly bumping my thread about Remain Fake news on Facebook to the top of the forum all day. "I'm not, I've given you everything you needed to understand and you've chosen not to..I said you let this thread die for 4hrs with an open question, I didn't reference a time you then said you were out for 4 hrs! I pointed out you posted in another thread an hour into that time. If you looked back on the thread it was 12 now 13 hrs ago it wasn't my fault you weren't bothered to look up and check the times. If you were out for 4 hrs it wasn't the 4 hrs you are referring to. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator.
12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago.
I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life.
I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life.
Do you understand now?
I went out at around 6pm for 4 hours so got back home around 10pm. That was 7 hours ago, not 11 hours. I didn't post on here between 6pm and 10pm. I just explained to you in an earlier post your 11 hours ago minus 4 hours out still left 7 hours to spare! You're making yourself look very foolish here.
No,because the period you let the thread die was 12 hrs ago....can you not read?
FFS I just gave you the exact times I was out. It was 7 hours ago, not 11 or 12. You can't read let alone add or subtract. I'm done arguing over petty points with you anyway, got work in the morning. Oh and thanks for constantly bumping my thread about Remain Fake news on Facebook to the top of the forum all day.
I'm not, I've given you everything you needed to understand and you've chosen not to..I said you let this thread die for 4hrs with an open question, I didn't reference a time you then said you were out for 4 hrs!
I pointed out you posted in another thread an hour into that time.
If you looked back on the thread it was 12 now 13 hrs ago it wasn't my fault you weren't bothered to look up and check the times.
If you were out for 4 hrs it wasn't the 4 hrs you are referring to."To make it clear to you you didn't answer between about 12:00 and 16:00 but posted at about 13:00 in another thread | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain ...and paying to run an add is fairly standard practice
To be clear they paid to run fake news ads. Is that standard practice for the Peoples vote campaign and the Open Britain remain campaign.
It's only fake news according to the Express that previously said that it...er...wasn't
There were 2 links posted in the OP. It's also fake news according to the Telegraph.
Links for this!?
Did you have one too many on that visit to the pub? The 2 links are on the opening post on this thread. One to the Telegraph and one to the Express. Best not to post with your beer goggles on in future.
They are impermissible as stated above!
You must have a pretty bad hangover this morning. Was it a heavy night on the beer?
The 2 links to 2 separate news sources are on the opening post on this thread.
From 2 suspect publications, can we have the original report? or another paper. As stated above the one of the publications you use seems to recycle the other.
Facebook ad link report.
Can we link to Facebook ?
It’s where I got my numbers to show leave spent more than the quoted 90k.
Screen shots of the fake news ads on Facebook are posted on the Telegraph report.
I've searched and can only find the Express article. I'm struggling to find the Telegraph report searching google.
What did you search for?
You don't need to find the Telegraph report on Google. It's linked on the opening post on this thread.
I know, I'm wonder how you found it? As when I search it doesn't come up.
Well it came up on my Google search very easily.
What did you type in? I want to try it.
All you need to know is I found it and it's posted on the opening post of this thread. If you want to look at it then use the link in the OP.
Are you deflecting? I sense you may have lied somewhere.
Some would passing alleged news as fact 'not very bright.'
Some would also allege that if you don't know how to use Google, makes you 'not very bright'.
Seriously if you did type what was it?
The article doesn't appear to have meta tags when I look at the source and that's usually how google searches.
This is strange as I'd presume the paper would want such a big story to be be on search engines and not just for people who are already on the site.
You posted an hour after this on another thread:
By Centaur_UKFind posts by Centaur_UK Man 11 hours ago
Cannock
"Another gem from the former Lib dem leader....
"I will forgive no one, who doesn't accept the democratic choice of the British people, whether it's by 1% or 20% because the British people are sovereign, and when they speak we carry out their wish, the British people demand it of us"
Remainer Paddy Ashdown speaking just before the votes were counted on EU referendum day, 23rd June 2016.
Has Paddy ever said that the will of the people should be ignored?
Paddy Ashdown stood up in the House of Lords and encouraged other Lords to vote against the EU Withdrawal bill, so in essence yes he did say the will of the people should be ignored when he did that. Ashdown's face was a picture when a pro Brexit Lord stood up and quoted what Paddy had said about Democracy on EU referendum day in 2016 before votes were counted.
The European Withdrawal Act gave secondary legislative powers to Ministers to introduce laws without Parliamentary scrutiny.
That was not saying that the will of the people should be ignored. Quite the opposite.
Paddy Ashdown was quite old when he said this. Does your criticism of him mean you hate old people Centaur?"
Now you've highlighted this it also shows remain voters are passing away over time as well. Paddy Ashdown was a remainer and is no longer with us. You posted the "Brexit crossover thread" about old people dying, you can own it.
So you're lying about your social life to you utter idiot.
The time stamp on that says 11 hours ago. Do you have any toes left after shooting yourself in the foot.
Read the posts above! See what I've said
I have and you are way out. Instead of counting on your fingers try using a calculator.
12hrs ago I asked you a question...the thread went silent for 4hrs I posted 8hrs ago.
I pointed out that you let this thread die for 4hrs without answer the question you said... It was your social life.
I then pointed out you posted 11 hrs ago 1 hrs into your 4 hrs of social life.
Do you understand now?
I went out at around 6pm for 4 hours so got back home around 10pm. That was 7 hours ago, not 11 hours. I didn't post on here between 6pm and 10pm. I just explained to you in an earlier post your 11 hours ago minus 4 hours out still left 7 hours to spare! You're making yourself look very foolish here.
No,because the period you let the thread die was 12 hrs ago....can you not read?
FFS I just gave you the exact times I was out. It was 7 hours ago, not 11 or 12. You can't read let alone add or subtract. I'm done arguing over petty points with you anyway, got work in the morning. Oh and thanks for constantly bumping my thread about Remain Fake news on Facebook to the top of the forum all day.
I'm not, I've given you everything you needed to understand and you've chosen not to..I said you let this thread die for 4hrs with an open question, I didn't reference a time you then said you were out for 4 hrs!
I pointed out you posted in another thread an hour into that time.
If you looked back on the thread it was 12 now 13 hrs ago it wasn't my fault you weren't bothered to look up and check the times.
If you were out for 4 hrs it wasn't the 4 hrs you are referring to.
To make it clear to you you didn't answer between about 12:00 and 16:00 but posted at about 13:00 in another thread"You then said you were out for 4 hrs from 18:00 till 22:00 which wasn't the 4 hrs the thread was dead after my question. Seriously just look above you're an idiot. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Centaur posting fake news about alleged "fake" remain news in every forum thread at the moment. Still not able to comment on why the Express is contradicting itself and which of its own articles is fake news "Alternative facts for alt reich people.They need comforting these days with lies... | |||
| |||
"Facebook should stamp any FAKE news as "Fake" and remove within 72 hours. Some form of punishment too - fine etc. This applies to EITHER SIDE- all we want is the truth! We deserve the TRUTH!" Probably easier said than done. You will only be able to stamp out lies, and not the ambiguous stuff. Clever campaigns will get around this by just enough suggestion. I think we need to hold our media to account before we start addressing Fb ads. | |||
"Facebook should stamp any FAKE news as "Fake" and remove within 72 hours. Some form of punishment too - fine etc. This applies to EITHER SIDE- all we want is the truth! We deserve the TRUTH! Probably easier said than done. You will only be able to stamp out lies, and not the ambiguous stuff. Clever campaigns will get around this by just enough suggestion. I think we need to hold our media to account before we start addressing Fb ads. " Something like a fact checker at the end of news bulletins- anything found to be fake "named and shamed " - paid for by the government! | |||
"Facebook should stamp any FAKE news as "Fake" and remove within 72 hours. Some form of punishment too - fine etc. This applies to EITHER SIDE- all we want is the truth! We deserve the TRUTH! Probably easier said than done. You will only be able to stamp out lies, and not the ambiguous stuff. Clever campaigns will get around this by just enough suggestion. I think we need to hold our media to account before we start addressing Fb ads. " That's the point. Even these two articles say that the remain adverts "are accused" of being fake news. Anyone can make an accusation and anyone cam then report on the accusation. It's just innuendo. | |||
"Its been revealed that Facebook has allowed Fake news stories funded by two Remain campaigns The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain on its website. The Peoples Vote UK and Open Britain paid Facebook hundreds of thousands of pounds (exactly £373,587.00) to run the anti Brexit fake news ads. www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/01/18/facebook-accused-pumping-fake-news-running-ads-claiming-endangered www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1074569/brexit-news-facebook-fake-news-endangered-animals-michael-gove-liam-fox-best-for-britain" Boring! Another subject....zzzz.... | |||
" Only a World Trade Deal will allow the UK to trade with countries across the globe. " | |||
| |||
"Does anyone take Farcebook posts as fact anyway? (Aside from guardian readers who will believe anything as long as it's left of left)? No wonder that rag has the lowest sales of any of the papers. The media seem to be trying to control politics, research everything of interest thoroughly, whether it's Farcebook, papers, forums or TV/radio. The sad thing in this case is how remain are trying to portray Britain as being weak, useless, lazy, thick, etc.. In reality the IMF are saying that a no deal scenario will result in Britain having the biggest g7 growth in Europe for 2019/2020. False advertising would be the thing to report it on, though all Farcebook are concerned about are $$'s and harvesting our information so don't expect much there." I agree that Facebook should not be used as a news source. Beyond that your statement is pretty fanciful. Only Guardian readers believe it? Based on what? Remain portraying the UK as weak? The entire leave campaign is based on us being bullied by other EU countries and having no control or say in anything which is clearly false. Looking at a situation critically has nothing to do with "doing the country down". You can't make change or process without looking at yourself honestly and seeing how the world looks at you. Do you disagree? Is everything great here? If not, what are the problems and what are the good points? Start a thread. If you can't find anything negative then you aren't being honest and vice versa. | |||
"Does anyone take Farcebook posts as fact anyway? (Aside from guardian readers who will believe anything as long as it's left of left)? No wonder that rag has the lowest sales of any of the papers. The media seem to be trying to control politics, research everything of interest thoroughly, whether it's Farcebook, papers, forums or TV/radio. The sad thing in this case is how remain are trying to portray Britain as being weak, useless, lazy, thick, etc.. In reality the IMF are saying that a no deal scenario will result in Britain having the biggest g7 growth in Europe for 2019/2020. False advertising would be the thing to report it on, though all Farcebook are concerned about are $$'s and harvesting our information so don't expect much there." Where did you get your information the IMF are saying such pro no deal messages ? | |||
