FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Monumental Fuck up on everything
Monumental Fuck up on everything
Jump to: Newest in thread
Right , I never do political threads , but now we need to discuss wtf is going on .....
I'm not keen on Trumps environmental policies, but even I have to admit , what he has said in this latest interview about Brexit , Khan , Boris, is blunt but , probably correct . I'm ready for all you lot that hate Trump . But as a President ( Not a person) he's actually done quite well .
But back to home , Mays shitty vision of Brexit has caused other prominent Mps to resign . It's a waste of paper .
Boris would at least make an upfront and honest PM. And I hope he runs for leadership .
I'm sure there's plenty of you that disagree with me , and that's fine, just had to voice my opinion !! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Boris and trump are only interested in themselves, they give not a jot how and what they have to do to achieve power..
Boris can't stop lying, being an affable buffoon with a quick wit may appeal in a social setting but even his own partysee him as a liability.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm not sure being honest is a qualification for premiership without the brains to go with it. And by 'brains', I mean the ability to know when not to express your honesty. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Boris and trump are only interested in themselves, they give not a jot how and what they have to do to achieve power..
Boris can't stop lying, being an affable buffoon with a quick wit may appeal in a social setting but even his own partysee him as a liability.. "
that can be said for many these days . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm not sure being honest is a qualification for premiership without the brains to go with it. And by 'brains', I mean the ability to know when not to express your honesty. "
Oh come on . Surely you realise Boris is far from Stupid . Yes of course he wants the top job , and yes he may want to be revered . But that doesn't mean he won't do a good job imo.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks."
I agree with a lot of this  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago
Barbados |
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks."
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago
Barbados |
"Right , I never do political threads , but now we need to discuss wtf is going on .....
I'm not keen on Trumps environmental policies, but even I have to admit , what he has said in this latest interview about Brexit , Khan , Boris, is blunt but , probably correct . I'm ready for all you lot that hate Trump . But as a President ( Not a person) he's actually done quite well .
But back to home , Mays shitty vision of Brexit has caused other prominent Mps to resign . It's a waste of paper .
Boris would at least make an upfront and honest PM. And I hope he runs for leadership .
I'm sure there's plenty of you that disagree with me , and that's fine, just had to voice my opinion !!"
"But as a President ( Not a person) he's actually done quite well ."
Has he? Really? What good has he done as a president, exactly? All he has done is seed more and more division in his country and gaslight the entire nation.
-Matt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks.
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt"
Oops sorry answered the wrong post. 
The question was simple. Leave or stay and the result was to leave. Full stop.
Project fear threatened the supposed dire consequences but the people voted to leave. Full stop.
The people didn't vote to leave in name only and keep everything they wanted to leave behind. Full stop.
The people didn't vote for a "Norway/Switzerland arrangement" because Cameron told them that it wasn't on the table. Full stop.
The only thing offered was leave or stay and the people voted to leave. Full stop.
It is now up to May to either deliver that or fuck off and let someone else do it. Full stop. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks.
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt
Oops sorry answered the wrong post.
The question was simple. Leave or stay and the result was to leave. Full stop.
Project fear threatened the supposed dire consequences but the people voted to leave. Full stop.
The people didn't vote to leave in name only and keep everything they wanted to leave behind. Full stop.
The people didn't vote for a "Norway/Switzerland arrangement" because Cameron told them that it wasn't on the table. Full stop.
The only thing offered was leave or stay and the people voted to leave. Full stop.
It is now up to May to either deliver that or fuck off and let someone else do it. Full stop."
article 50 has been triggered. Unless this is reverse s we are leaving the Eu. Whether our new relationship mirrors some of the conditions being in the EU entails I’d not relevant. Whether you think this is the EU by any other name matters not. She has delivered what has been put on the reforendum paper. Unless she menor is claiming we are legally still in the EU once we leave ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks.
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt
Oops sorry answered the wrong post.
The question was simple. Leave or stay and the result was to leave. Full stop.
Project fear threatened the supposed dire consequences but the people voted to leave. Full stop.
The people didn't vote to leave in name only and keep everything they wanted to leave behind. Full stop.
The people didn't vote for a "Norway/Switzerland arrangement" because Cameron told them that it wasn't on the table. Full stop.
The only thing offered was leave or stay and the people voted to leave. Full stop.
It is now up to May to either deliver that or fuck off and let someone else do it. Full stop."
Couldn't have put it better myself |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks.
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt
Oops sorry answered the wrong post.
The question was simple. Leave or stay and the result was to leave. Full stop.
Project fear threatened the supposed dire consequences but the people voted to leave. Full stop.
The people didn't vote to leave in name only and keep everything they wanted to leave behind. Full stop.
The people didn't vote for a "Norway/Switzerland arrangement" because Cameron told them that it wasn't on the table. Full stop.
The only thing offered was leave or stay and the people voted to leave. Full stop.
It is now up to May to either deliver that or fuck off and let someone else do it. Full stop."
Brexit means Brexit. Since everyone voted for that she finally told us what Brexit means. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks.
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt
Oops sorry answered the wrong post.
The question was simple. Leave or stay and the result was to leave. Full stop.
Project fear threatened the supposed dire consequences but the people voted to leave. Full stop.
The people didn't vote to leave in name only and keep everything they wanted to leave behind. Full stop.
The people didn't vote for a "Norway/Switzerland arrangement" because Cameron told them that it wasn't on the table. Full stop.
The only thing offered was leave or stay and the people voted to leave. Full stop.
It is now up to May to either deliver that or fuck off and let someone else do it. Full stop.
Brexit means Brexit. Since everyone voted for that she finally told us what Brexit means."
No. She told us what the lobbyists THINK Brexit SHOULD mean |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oyce69Man
over a year ago
Driffield |
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks.
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt
Oops sorry answered the wrong post.
The question was simple. Leave or stay and the result was to leave. Full stop.
Project fear threatened the supposed dire consequences but the people voted to leave. Full stop.
The people didn't vote to leave in name only and keep everything they wanted to leave behind. Full stop.
The people didn't vote for a "Norway/Switzerland arrangement" because Cameron told them that it wasn't on the table. Full stop.
The only thing offered was leave or stay and the people voted to leave. Full stop.
It is now up to May to either deliver that or fuck off and let someone else do it. Full stop. Couldn't have put it better myself "
And that's a thumbs up from me as well. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm not sure being honest is a qualification for premiership without the brains to go with it. And by 'brains', I mean the ability to know when not to express your honesty. Oh come on . Surely you realise Boris is far from Stupid . Yes of course he wants the top job , and yes he may want to be revered . But that doesn't mean he won't do a good job imo. "
Ah, brains are complicated things. However, without the capacity to filter the mouth, a 'good' one lessens its effect, or worse, causes damage |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oi_LucyCouple
over a year ago
Barbados |
"May has been worse than hopeless on Brexit. She just can't understand what the people voted for. But what do you expect from someone who hid behind the sofa for nearly all of the referendum campaign?
The vote was to leave the EU. Not to "leave" one foot in, or as she seems to see it one and a half feet in.
Now Trump has bitten her on the arse I expect a U turn on the Chequers "agreement" quite soon.
Would Boris make a good PM? Probably, but not yet. He's far too petulant and opportunistic, but I do think that he has the intellect for the job and one day could be a very good PM. As for the rest of the Conservative front bench, forget them all. Now Davis has left there's not a decent one amongst them.
However don't take that as an endorsement for the other rabble.
Corbyn is an opportunistic twat, ditto McDonnel. Nonce finder general Watson is too busy smearing dead Tories to be any use, and let's be honest, even the most die hard Labour supporter has to admit that Abbott is only on the front bench because she used to be (maybe still is) Corbyn's FWB.
The few capable politicians in the Labour party have all shuffled off to the back benches to bide their time and wait for the inevitable train wreck.
Interesting times ahead methinks.
"She just can't understand what the people voted for. "
That is because no-one knows what the people voted for. They were not actually asked, remember? Then all May could come up with for two years was "Brexit means brexit". It was the rhetorical device she used to unite a whole panacea of leave views without having to actually look at what they meant.
But remember, we kept getting told that "We voted to leave, will of the people, we now have to get behind our PM!"
Well, how's that working out? Having beed repeatedly told we need to 'get behind' her, and 'get behind' brexit, is it not now blatantly clear that the emperor has no clothes?
-Matt
Oops sorry answered the wrong post.
The question was simple. Leave or stay and the result was to leave. Full stop.
Project fear threatened the supposed dire consequences but the people voted to leave. Full stop.
The people didn't vote to leave in name only and keep everything they wanted to leave behind. Full stop.
The people didn't vote for a "Norway/Switzerland arrangement" because Cameron told them that it wasn't on the table. Full stop.
The only thing offered was leave or stay and the people voted to leave. Full stop.
It is now up to May to either deliver that or fuck off and let someone else do it. Full stop.
Brexit means Brexit. Since everyone voted for that she finally told us what Brexit means.
No. She told us what the lobbyists THINK Brexit SHOULD mean "
And? What difference does that make? She told us Brexit means brexit. Any attempt to flesh that out was met with waffle and glib catchphrases.
And every time anyone who voted remain said that it wasn't clear at vote time what 'leave' actually meant was derided. "Of course we knew what we were voting for! Brexit means brexit!". And low and behold now that May is trying to deliver 'the will of the people'... it turns out that brexit might mean a different brexit to what you imagined.
-Matt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ara JTV/TS
over a year ago
Bristol East |
Reverse the situation.
Mrs May goes to America to meet their president.
Beforehand, she gives an interview with the country's most-watched TV show and says:
a) the president is getting it all wrong
b) he won't listen to me
c) that person over there would make a great president.
They'd run her out of town.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Right , I never do political threads , but now we need to discuss wtf is going on .....
I'm not keen on Trumps environmental policies, but even I have to admit , what he has said in this latest interview about Brexit , Khan , Boris, is blunt but , probably correct . I'm ready for all you lot that hate Trump . But as a President ( Not a person) he's actually done quite well .
But back to home , Mays shitty vision of Brexit has caused other prominent Mps to resign . It's a waste of paper .
Boris would at least make an upfront and honest PM. And I hope he runs for leadership .
I'm sure there's plenty of you that disagree with me , and that's fine, just had to voice my opinion !!"
Brexit was a fuck up ,
A little over 50% of the people voted to leave and just under 50% wants to stay ,
So what may has came up with ant a bad solution .
half in half out every one is halfway happy .
no one is fully satisfied but no one is ignored either ,
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Right , I never do political threads , but now we need to discuss wtf is going on .....
I'm not keen on Trumps environmental policies, but even I have to admit , what he has said in this latest interview about Brexit , Khan , Boris, is blunt but , probably correct . I'm ready for all you lot that hate Trump . But as a President ( Not a person) he's actually done quite well .
But back to home , Mays shitty vision of Brexit has caused other prominent Mps to resign . It's a waste of paper .
Boris would at least make an upfront and honest PM. And I hope he runs for leadership .
I'm sure there's plenty of you that disagree with me , and that's fine, just had to voice my opinion !!
Brexit was a fuck up ,
A little over 50% of the people voted to leave and just under 50% wants to stay ,
So what may has came up with ant a bad solution .
half in half out every one is halfway happy .
no one is fully satisfied but no one is ignored either ,
"
But that’s no good for anybody is it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Right , I never do political threads , but now we need to discuss wtf is going on .....
I'm not keen on Trumps environmental policies, but even I have to admit , what he has said in this latest interview about Brexit , Khan , Boris, is blunt but , probably correct . I'm ready for all you lot that hate Trump . But as a President ( Not a person) he's actually done quite well .
But back to home , Mays shitty vision of Brexit has caused other prominent Mps to resign . It's a waste of paper .
Boris would at least make an upfront and honest PM. And I hope he runs for leadership .
I'm sure there's plenty of you that disagree with me , and that's fine, just had to voice my opinion !!
Brexit was a fuck up ,
A little over 50% of the people voted to leave and just under 50% wants to stay ,
So what may has came up with ant a bad solution .
half in half out every one is halfway happy .
no one is fully satisfied but no one is ignored either ,
But that’s no good for anybody is it?"
define good. It’s a compromise. And one which may be majoring on People’s key concerns at expense of their minor ones.
To go in circles again, a big fear seemed to be of the risk of open ended immigration. (I think someone said unlimited earlier on). This may solve it. It may also solve the fear of benefit tourists.
However it may not completely provide full full control on every single person, as someone may qualify for a visa via one of the agreements.
So while it may not be all someone wants, that may be a big step. Anyone who wants everything and won’t cede ground is always going to be disappointed. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Right , I never do political threads , but now we need to discuss wtf is going on .....
I'm not keen on Trumps environmental policies, but even I have to admit , what he has said in this latest interview about Brexit , Khan , Boris, is blunt but , probably correct . I'm ready for all you lot that hate Trump . But as a President ( Not a person) he's actually done quite well .
But back to home , Mays shitty vision of Brexit has caused other prominent Mps to resign . It's a waste of paper .
Boris would at least make an upfront and honest PM. And I hope he runs for leadership .
I'm sure there's plenty of you that disagree with me , and that's fine, just had to voice my opinion !!"
I agree with you  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I forgot to add:
His behaviour is tantamount to regime change."
So, what did you make of Obama’s visit just before the referendum, and of course the threats he made?
That ok was it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I forgot to add:
His behaviour is tantamount to regime change.
So, what did you make of Obama’s visit just before the referendum, and of course the threats he made?
That ok was it?"
So you agree both Obama and Trump did a bad thing? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
