FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > This whole Russian thing
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We need to be careful ? We've made this bed ! We should have helped and supported Russia more after the fall of communism instead of just taking advantage of Russias weakness at the time ! A bit like the allies after the First World War , and look what happened ! " Spot on! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"50 murders in London is unfortunately a minor issue next to the attempted murder of the Skripals. Fact is one is about an increase in teen gang killings in the capital and is a matter of policing. The other is a matter of utmost international importance because the accusation is that Russia has used a banned chemical agent on British soil to attempt to kill a former spy and therefore committed an act of war against the British people. Like it or not, any story that has the potential of starting a war against a nuclear power that's leadership has shown a willingness to do anything to win tops a few gang killings every day of the week." Can you give me one example of how putin plotting to kill this russian (who has served time for his crime) with a chemical agent that would point straight back to the russian goverment instead of a simple assassination by other means especially at time of a re-election. There simply isnt one at all that would make any sense what so ever. As ive said the only people to benefit from this is those that have it in for russia. What ever you may think of putin he just isnt that dumb of a person. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can you give me one example of how putin plotting to kill this russian (who has served time for his crime) with a chemical agent that would point straight back to the russian goverment instead of a simple assassination by other means especially at time of a re-election. There simply isnt one at all that would make any sense what so ever. As ive said the only people to benefit from this is those that have it in for russia. What ever you may think of putin he just isnt that dumb of a person. " The issue is not if Putin ordered the attempted assassination or not. In fact that is totally superflues to the issues, which are: 1. A weapon banned both by international law and treaty was used. And 2. The British government has accused the Russian government of the attack. The above 2 are the important issues and are the reason that russia has reacted so angrily and the increase in political tensions resulting in an increased level of military brinkmanship round our airspace and territorial waters. Of course BoJo is continually fanning the flames rather than doing his job and downplaying the crisis that is of his (and the government he is a member of) making. And like it or not the British politician who comes out of this looking most statesmanlike is JC. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We need to be careful ? We've made this bed ! We should have helped and supported Russia more after the fall of communism instead of just taking advantage of Russias weakness at the time ! A bit like the allies after the First World War , and look what happened ! " . Do you know much about Russian history or even modern history?. You raise a very interesting point little reported by western media, if you whirl back to 98 or 99 and the Russian election, which party were favourites to be elected!!. Yes it was the communists... How bad do you think it was in the 90s in Russia when your re-electing the communists. Now there was if I remember correctly a series of bombings in Russia which basically was the prelude to the Chechen war and this was the primary factor for the election of one Vladimir Putin, Russia was run by oligarchs and gangsters (in fact there one and the same). There's connections back from lots and lots of these Russian murders to this beginning. There's a book called blowing up Russia (I think), it's well worth a read if you want to understand the Geo politics of this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"50 murders in London is unfortunately a minor issue next to the attempted murder of the Skripals. Fact is one is about an increase in teen gang killings in the capital and is a matter of policing. The other is a matter of utmost international importance because the accusation is that Russia has used a banned chemical agent on British soil to attempt to kill a former spy and therefore committed an act of war against the British people. Like it or not, any story that has the potential of starting a war against a nuclear power that's leadership has shown a willingness to do anything to win tops a few gang killings every day of the week. Can you give me one example of how putin plotting to kill this russian (who has served time for his crime) with a chemical agent that would point straight back to the russian goverment instead of a simple assassination by other means especially at time of a re-election. There simply isnt one at all that would make any sense what so ever. As ive said the only people to benefit from this is those that have it in for russia. What ever you may think of putin he just isnt that dumb of a person. " i am guessing someone has been watching RT again...... but what i will say is this..... the tactics the russians have tried to use post attack are very similar to the ones they used with the dutch with regards to the shooting down of MH-17 firstly they put out various conspiracy theories, then tried to muddy the waters, then questions the dutch authorities, then tried to get themselves on the independent investigation....... they then questioned those findings in advance.... its is like a playbook moscow has.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can you give me one example of how putin plotting to kill this russian (who has served time for his crime) with a chemical agent that would point straight back to the russian goverment instead of a simple assassination by other means especially at time of a re-election. There simply isnt one at all that would make any sense what so ever. As ive said the only people to benefit from this is those that have it in for russia. What ever you may think of putin he just isnt that dumb of a person. The issue is not if Putin ordered the attempted assassination or not. In fact that is totally superflues to the issues, which are: 1. A weapon banned both by international law and treaty was used. And 2. The British government has accused the Russian government of the attack. The above 2 are the important issues and are the reason that russia has reacted so angrily and the increase in political tensions resulting in an increased level of military brinkmanship round our airspace and territorial waters. Of course BoJo is continually fanning the flames rather than doing his job and downplaying the crisis that is of his (and the government he is a member of) making. And like it or not the British politician who comes out of this looking most statesmanlike is JC." Hate to admit it , but I agree ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s all been set up by the u.k and the u.s. Hv a look at the vids on YouTube. David Icke is spot on with why they’ve done it. All to start ww3. Which will happen. Too many people believe fake news and what our government want people to believe. " I have no time for Ike and his conspiracy theories. Fact is we have a loudmouthed blusterer for a foreign secretary and a government that is in total disarray that has a history of inflating any issue that can be used as a distraction without first considering the ramifications of its actions. then when things start going wrong doubling down on their initial position and holding a party line until forced by events to retract and make quiet and grudging half apologies. This is nothing but another example of BoJo going off at half cock. The only difference is this one could start a war we can't win! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s all been set up by the u.k and the u.s. Hv a look at the vids on YouTube. David Icke is spot on with why they’ve done it. All to start ww3. Which will happen. Too many people believe fake news and what our government want people to believe. " I thought the lizard people had something to do with this.I suppose the conspiracy theorists who love Putin want us to bomb the dark side of the moon.Seems legit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think it will start a war. It is obvious the Russians have done it and they will use any means to point the finger at anyone else. I think the UK government response, including Bojo has been perfect, and it will make the Russians think twice before doing it again. Wont stop them trying to interfere in our elections and basically disrupt us as much as they can. Maybe JC can join Salmond on RT after he loses the next election. " So who is lying, BoJo or the director of Porton Down? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think it will start a war. It is obvious the Russians have done it and they will use any means to point the finger at anyone else. I think the UK government response, including Bojo has been perfect, and it will make the Russians think twice before doing it again. Wont stop them trying to interfere in our elections and basically disrupt us as much as they can. Maybe JC can join Salmond on RT after he loses the next election. So who is lying, BoJo or the director of Porton Down?" I dont know who said what when, but it doesnt take a great brain to work this mystery out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s all been set up by the u.k and the u.s. Hv a look at the vids on YouTube. David Icke is spot on with why they’ve done it. All to start ww3. Which will happen. Too many people believe fake news and what our government want people to believe. " The Western media have not really reported on the Chinese starting up the Petro-Yuan, and they have dumped the Petro dollar to start trading in oil in Yuan instead. Russia and Iran have allied themselves with China along with North Korea, Egypt, Turkey, Lebanon, Bashir Al Assad's Syria and the BRICS alliance. First guy to dump the petro dollar and wanted to start up an alternative currency to trade in oil was Saddam Hussain in Iraq then the Americans and the West found a convenient excuse to go to war to remove him (weapons of mass destruction which we now know never existed). The next guy after Saddam who tried it was Colonel Gaddafi in Libya, when he became President of the African Union, he wanted to set up a united African currency to trade in oil and dump the Petro dollar. We know what happened next as the west found an excuse to go to war to remove Gaddafi. Both times the western media didn't really cover the fact that Saddam Hussain and Gaddafi wanted to dump the Petro dollar and start up an alternative trading currency in oil. The USA set up a deal with Saudi Arabia decades ago to trade all global oil in dollars, they won't allow anyone else in on the deal. It looks to me like history repeating itself and the West looking for excuses to go to war, (Trumps trade war with China, the diplomatic fall out over the Salisbury poisoning and Trumps war of words with Kim Jong Un over nuclear weapons in North Korea). This time is different though as Iraq and Libya were push overs militarily for the West. China is an economic superpower and Russia and North Korea are Nuclear powers who are all allied together. If this kicks off then it'll be the start of WW3. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It’s all been set up by the u.k and the u.s. Hv a look at the vids on YouTube. David Icke is spot on with why they’ve done it. All to start ww3. Which will happen. Too many people believe fake news and what our government want people to believe. I have no time for Ike and his conspiracy theories. Fact is we have a loudmouthed blusterer for a foreign secretary and a government that is in total disarray that has a history of inflating any issue that can be used as a distraction without first considering the ramifications of its actions. then when things start going wrong doubling down on their initial position and holding a party line until forced by events to retract and make quiet and grudging half apologies. This is nothing but another example of BoJo going off at half cock. The only difference is this one could start a war we can't win! " . It's not about starting a war!!. This is part of the myth used on both sides to perpetuate military spending and fear in its own people!. Every nation state has a "deep state" the Russians more than anyone, this probably was a Russian assassination attempt but what any good analyst will tell you is "state sponsored" ones tend to be a little bit more secretive and professional, there's many many layers to the Russian state, see my post above, Putin has more enemies at home than he does abroad, people like Boris berezovsky himself murdered are deeply implicated in Russian internal politics and Geo politics is used in that fight. And just like them 'we" have politicians who know better using this as a tool, we have secret service personal engaged in both defensive and offensive policies, agents and counter agents and double agents and "traitors". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lmfao the uk and USA are behind this what next Elvis is still alive lol" Yeah, and USA never went to the moon and planes never hit the twin towers, it was just an experiment using a new secret energy weapon, and Steven Hawking died 30 years ago, and there is a cheap cure for cancer but the drug companies are hiding it. The internet's a wonderful place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"For Gods sake, someone tell Putin about Fab...give him something to focus his free time on. That should stop him meddling in the affairs of other countries " I'm sure he already gets as much pussy as he wants, and who knows, maybe some cock too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lmfao the uk and USA are behind this what next Elvis is still alive lol Yeah, and USA never went to the moon and planes never hit the twin towers, it was just an experiment using a new secret energy, and Steven Hawking died 30 years ago, and there is a cheap cure for cancer but the drug companies are hiding it. The internet's a wonderful place." Poke fun all you like but If you think the USA are not capable of conducting false flag operations then go away and do some research about operation Northwoods in 1962. Operation Northwoods was a plan drawn up by the US department of defence and the Joint chiefs of staff to use CIA operatives to commit acts of terrorism against the American people, to make it look like Cuba were responsible as an excuse to justify an invasion of Cuba. The plan was rejected by the then President JFK. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm sure he already gets as much pussy as he wants, and who knows, maybe some cock too." Not sure he is interested in pussy... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lmfao the uk and USA are behind this what next Elvis is still alive lol Yeah, and USA never went to the moon and planes never hit the twin towers, it was just an experiment using a new secret energy, and Steven Hawking died 30 years ago, and there is a cheap cure for cancer but the drug companies are hiding it. The internet's a wonderful place. Poke fun all you like but If you think the USA are not capable of conducting false flag operations then go away and do some research about operation Northwoods in 1962. Operation Northwoods was a plan drawn up by the US department of defence and the Joint chiefs of staff to use CIA operatives to commit acts of terrorism against the American people, to make it look like Cuba were responsible as an excuse to justify an invasion of Cuba. The plan was rejected by the then President JFK. " Yes, and we know about that.Its not a question of capability - there are nasty people in every country. But big conspiracies are very difficult to keep secret for a long period of time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dont think it will start a war. It is obvious the Russians have done it and they will use any means to point the finger at anyone else. I think the UK government response, including Bojo has been perfect, and it will make the Russians think twice before doing it again. Wont stop them trying to interfere in our elections and basically disrupt us as much as they can. Maybe JC can join Salmond on RT after he loses the next election. So who is lying, BoJo or the director of Porton Down?" As far as I know from media the Director of Porton Down said the agent was military grade and likely to come from a state laboratory because it is not easy to make - and that was as far as he was prepared to go. Sounds reasonable to me - this stuff is not like radioisotopes which can in some cases be traced to specific reactors. BoJo claims to have put this together with some other intel which no-one else has seen and 'proved' the Russians did it - however other government spokespeople have said they 'believe' the Russians did it - which is a bit different level of proof. We are unlikely ever to be able to prove it one way or the other unless the actual person who stuck the stuff on the door handle is actually caught. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. " There is of course not the slightest bit of evidence for any of that and you seem to be quoting Government propaganda put out by the mainstream media. It is a simple truth that Russia is not the only state that could have made the nerve agent: dozens of them could. It could also have been made by many non-state actors. Gary Aitkenhead, Chief Executive of Porton Down chemical weapons establishment – said in his Sky interview that “probably” only a state actor could create the nerve agent. That is to admit the possibility that a non state actor could. David Collum, Professor of Organo-Chemistry at Cornell University, infinitely more qualified the CEO at Porton Down (who is NOT a chemist but was actually Motorola salesman), has stated that his senior students could do it. The government (Boris) have lied about the certainty of the provenance of the nerve agent, and his fall back evidence is at present highly unconvincing. The whole story is rubbish from start to finish. Nerve agents – above all “military grade nerve agents” – were designed as battlefield weapons. They do not leave opponents fighting fit for hours. There is no description in the scientific literature of a nerve agent having this extraordinary time bomb effect. This is from the Scientific American publication Unlike traditional poisons, nerve agents don’t need to be added to food and drink to be effective. They are quite volatile, colourless liquids (except VX, said to resemble engine oil). The concentration in the vapour at room temperature is lethal. The symptoms of poisoning come on quickly, and include chest tightening, difficulty in breathing, and very likely asphyxiation. Associated symptoms include vomiting and massive incontinence. Victims of the Tokyo subway attack were reported to be bringing up blood. Kim Jong-nam died in less than 20 minutes. Eventually, you die either through asphyxiation or cardiac arrest. While Vladimir Putin and his government are not beyond criticism – in fact, far from it – their misdeeds pale in comparison to the record of Western governments in destroying one country after the other in the Middle East. The media's nonsense about Putin having expansionist aims is an attempt to throw a smokescreen over the West’s own expansionist agenda in Eastern Europe with the goal of throwing a cordon sanitaire around Russia in pursuit of a cold war agenda. As I've said before it makes no sense at all from Russia's pont of view. “Comrade Putin, we have successfully stockpiled novichoks in secret for ten years, and kept them hidden from the OPCW inspectors. We have also trained our agents in secret novichok assassination techniques. The programme has cost hundreds of millions of dollars, but now we are ready. Naturally, the first time we use it we will expose our secret and suffer massive international blowback. So who should be our first target? The head of a foreign intelligence agency? A leading jihadist rebel in Syria? A key nuclear scientist? Even a Head of State?” “No, Tovarich. There is this old retired guy I know living in Salisbury. We released him from jail years ago…” Wake up people and look what our neocon government is doing before it's too late. Start reading beyond the mainstream media that is all controlled by the establishment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. There is of course not the slightest bit of evidence for any of that and you seem to be quoting Government propaganda put out by the mainstream media. It is a simple truth that Russia is not the only state that could have made the nerve agent: dozens of them could. It could also have been made by many non-state actors. Gary Aitkenhead, Chief Executive of Porton Down chemical weapons establishment – said in his Sky interview that “probably” only a state actor could create the nerve agent. That is to admit the possibility that a non state actor could. David Collum, Professor of Organo-Chemistry at Cornell University, infinitely more qualified the CEO at Porton Down (who is NOT a chemist but was actually Motorola salesman), has stated that his senior students could do it. The government (Boris) have lied about the certainty of the provenance of the nerve agent, and his fall back evidence is at present highly unconvincing. The whole story is rubbish from start to finish. Nerve agents – above all “military grade nerve agents” – were designed as battlefield weapons. They do not leave opponents fighting fit for hours. There is no description in the scientific literature of a nerve agent having this extraordinary time bomb effect. This is from the Scientific American publication Unlike traditional poisons, nerve agents don’t need to be added to food and drink to be effective. They are quite volatile, colourless liquids (except VX, said to resemble engine oil). The concentration in the vapour at room temperature is lethal. The symptoms of poisoning come on quickly, and include chest tightening, difficulty in breathing, and very likely asphyxiation. Associated symptoms include vomiting and massive incontinence. Victims of the Tokyo subway attack were reported to be bringing up blood. Kim Jong-nam died in less than 20 minutes. Eventually, you die either through asphyxiation or cardiac arrest. While Vladimir Putin and his government are not beyond criticism – in fact, far from it – their misdeeds pale in comparison to the record of Western governments in destroying one country after the other in the Middle East. The media's nonsense about Putin having expansionist aims is an attempt to throw a smokescreen over the West’s own expansionist agenda in Eastern Europe with the goal of throwing a cordon sanitaire around Russia in pursuit of a cold war agenda. As I've said before it makes no sense at all from Russia's pont of view. “Comrade Putin, we have successfully stockpiled novichoks in secret for ten years, and kept them hidden from the OPCW inspectors. We have also trained our agents in secret novichok assassination techniques. The programme has cost hundreds of millions of dollars, but now we are ready. Naturally, the first time we use it we will expose our secret and suffer massive international blowback. So who should be our first target? The head of a foreign intelligence agency? A leading jihadist rebel in Syria? A key nuclear scientist? Even a Head of State?” “No, Tovarich. There is this old retired guy I know living in Salisbury. We released him from jail years ago…” Wake up people and look what our neocon government is doing before it's too late. Start reading beyond the mainstream media that is all controlled by the establishment. " No? No evidence that the Russians have done it before? Tell that to Markov and Litvinyenko. Novichok is Russian/USSR. If you believe that not to be the case, then which country to you believe invented it. If you believe that Skripal wasn't a spy, what do you think his conviction was for? If you believe that his daughter isn't a Russian citizen, then where do you think she is a citizen? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. " How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player" The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? " that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self " Quite. As if where it was invented, decades ago means it can still only be made there. Also I do love this USSR/Russia thing, as if they are somehow one and the same. Consider the states that made up the USSR and its many sattelites in Eastern Europe - presumably there was quite a bit of information-sharing going on.... It's almost like saying that a Diesel engine could only come from Germany.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self " If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. " No, you said it was "Russian/Soviet", meaning somehow you think they are the same thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? " so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. " interesting theory indeed , but not qualified as hard evidence . A democracy who judges based on assumption is not worth its own claim . Show me the smoking gun Unless evidence is provided to erase any reasonable doubt the defendant is to be considered innocent, whether we like it or not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. interesting theory indeed , but not qualified as hard evidence . A democracy who judges based on assumption is not worth its own claim . Show me the smoking gun Unless evidence is provided to erase any reasonable doubt the defendant is to be considered innocent, whether we like it or not" I don't think you know much about how the security services work if you believe that to be the case, or you expect state secrets to be revealed to fulfil your morbid curiosity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? " I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We need to be careful ? We've made this bed ! We should have helped and supported Russia more after the fall of communism instead of just taking advantage of Russias weakness at the time ! A bit like the allies after the First World War , and look what happened ! " There's something in that. We got a little carried away in the victory over communism and allowed Putin to happen. That said, we do now have to deal with Putin who runs a totalitarian regime significantly more corrupt than our own. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. No, you said it was "Russian/Soviet", meaning somehow you think they are the same thing. " Ok, I'll keep that in mind for your post about the British Empire then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes " This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus....." Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? " Actually, some nuclear weapons went to Ukraine. The EU and USA guaranteed Ukraine's security if they have them up. Then we all rolled over when Russia invaded. Oh wait. Russia didn't invade, there was a referendum and a spontaneous uprising. There's no evidence of Russian involvement after all Obviously national intelligence agencies are also not set up to disguise any direct involvement of their state when committing an act of aggression. They usually leave a visiting card like the Milk Tray Man | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. interesting theory indeed , but not qualified as hard evidence . A democracy who judges based on assumption is not worth its own claim . Show me the smoking gun Unless evidence is provided to erase any reasonable doubt the defendant is to be considered innocent, whether we like it or not I don't think you know much about how the security services work if you believe that to be the case, or you expect state secrets to be revealed to fulfil your morbid curiosity. " Well, as former member of the Eastern German civil rights movement i had my fair share to learn how secret services work, it wasnt the Russian one but the Stasi tho, but i guess i have learned first hand more then you ever can read about | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. interesting theory indeed , but not qualified as hard evidence . A democracy who judges based on assumption is not worth its own claim . Show me the smoking gun Unless evidence is provided to erase any reasonable doubt the defendant is to be considered innocent, whether we like it or not I don't think you know much about how the security services work if you believe that to be the case, or you expect state secrets to be revealed to fulfil your morbid curiosity. Well, as former member of the Eastern German civil rights movement i had my fair share to learn how secret services work, it wasnt the Russian one but the Stasi tho, but i guess i have learned first hand more then you ever can read about " And in your experience did the Stasi always presume innocence until all reasonable doubt had been removed? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. interesting theory indeed , but not qualified as hard evidence . A democracy who judges based on assumption is not worth its own claim . Show me the smoking gun Unless evidence is provided to erase any reasonable doubt the defendant is to be considered innocent, whether we like it or not I don't think you know much about how the security services work if you believe that to be the case, or you expect state secrets to be revealed to fulfil your morbid curiosity. Well, as former member of the Eastern German civil rights movement i had my fair share to learn how secret services work, it wasnt the Russian one but the Stasi tho, but i guess i have learned first hand more then you ever can read about And in your experience did the Stasi always presume innocence until all reasonable doubt had been removed? " Nope, if they went for the kill, they did not leave traces nor survivors to tell the tale | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? " It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. interesting theory indeed , but not qualified as hard evidence . A democracy who judges based on assumption is not worth its own claim . Show me the smoking gun Unless evidence is provided to erase any reasonable doubt the defendant is to be considered innocent, whether we like it or not I don't think you know much about how the security services work if you believe that to be the case, or you expect state secrets to be revealed to fulfil your morbid curiosity. Well, as former member of the Eastern German civil rights movement i had my fair share to learn how secret services work, it wasnt the Russian one but the Stasi tho, but i guess i have learned first hand more then you ever can read about And in your experience did the Stasi always presume innocence until all reasonable doubt had been removed? Nope, if they went for the kill, they did not leave traces nor survivors to tell the tale" Right, so you agree with me that security services don't presume innocence until all reasonable doubt has been removed then . Would I also be right in assuming, in your experience, that the Stasi did not publically announce their intelligence sources, or what exactly they knew? And therefore your expectation that British security services should do exactly that runs contrary to the normal working of a security service? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany...." No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. " You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... " That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. " No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? that Novichok has been invented in USSR is undebated, that doesn’t mean that other states or anyone with appropriate equipment could not reproduce it. As the daughter is quite isolated and “protected” by Secret Service” men, she could be pressured by British secrets service as one suspects that Russians do On anything of this kind there is akways the question of “ quo boni” - who has a benefit. I cannot see the benefit for the Russians to take a retired agent out. They were done with him all long. And late revenge in such amateur manner ain’t Russian style either . If they go for the kill, they do it properly and wouldn’t leave the slightest chance for BoJo and entourage to embarrass them self If she felt any pressure from the UK security services then wouldn't she be more likely to accept assistance from her government? I'm glad that you accept the undebated assertion that Novichok is Russian as I stated. Russia benefits, or they assumed that they would when they did it. It was a signal that anyone who fucks with Putin or the Russian state can be got to. It doesn't matter if you have escaped the country, they can reach out and get you, and get your family too. It's not going to be quick, it's going to be long, nasty, painful, and while you are lying there dying, you will know exactly who has done this to you. That is a very very powerful motivation for someone like Putin. He doesn't want anyone to think that you can fuck with him with impunity. interesting theory indeed , but not qualified as hard evidence . A democracy who judges based on assumption is not worth its own claim . Show me the smoking gun Unless evidence is provided to erase any reasonable doubt the defendant is to be considered innocent, whether we like it or not I don't think you know much about how the security services work if you believe that to be the case, or you expect state secrets to be revealed to fulfil your morbid curiosity. Well, as former member of the Eastern German civil rights movement i had my fair share to learn how secret services work, it wasnt the Russian one but the Stasi tho, but i guess i have learned first hand more then you ever can read about And in your experience did the Stasi always presume innocence until all reasonable doubt had been removed? Nope, if they went for the kill, they did not leave traces nor survivors to tell the tale Right, so you agree with me that security services don't presume innocence until all reasonable doubt has been removed then . Would I also be right in assuming, in your experience, that the Stasi did not publically announce their intelligence sources, or what exactly they knew? And therefore your expectation that British security services should do exactly that runs contrary to the normal working of a security service? " Well, in an international row of this dimension the Stasi would not have disclosed a word unless watertiggt proof. Just tgat we don't misunderstand each other, i am nit saying the Brirish secret service doing a poor job, i am only saying that conclusions and judgement should not be drawn until watertight evidence is produced. That is not the case, up to now only assumptions and suspicions float the public to justify state of affairs and that imho is a bit thin for a democracy as stated in my previous post. I am certain that if they would have any it would have been published. It has a bit the taste of the time when the life of British soldiers were sacrisfied to hunt for illusive weapons of mass destructions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. " Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. " FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The issue really is not where this agent came from or who delivered it and on whose behalf. The issue is who has said what and when, and to be honest the Foreign Secretary should be the government's voice of diplomatic caution until there could be no challenging any statements made. Instead he is leading the brinkmanship brigade. Not really what is required in the political leader of the Foreign Office and Diplomatic service whose job it is to pour oil on troubled waters not stir up a maelstrom. " But it's BoJo, so we know he'll act like an utter moron. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But it's BoJo, so we know he'll act like an utter moron. " No! It's the Foreign Secretary and now the Russian ambassador has demanded a meeting with the Foreign Secretary... That means a diplomatic note... And that is one step away from breaking diplomatic relations or maybe even a declaration of war! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. There is of course not the slightest bit of evidence for any of that and you seem to be quoting Government propaganda put out by the mainstream media. It is a simple truth that Russia is not the only state that could have made the nerve agent: dozens of them could. It could also have been made by many non-state actors. Gary Aitkenhead, Chief Executive of Porton Down chemical weapons establishment – said in his Sky interview that “probably” only a state actor could create the nerve agent. That is to admit the possibility that a non state actor could. David Collum, Professor of Organo-Chemistry at Cornell University, infinitely more qualified the CEO at Porton Down (who is NOT a chemist but was actually Motorola salesman), has stated that his senior students could do it. The government (Boris) have lied about the certainty of the provenance of the nerve agent, and his fall back evidence is at present highly unconvincing. The whole story is rubbish from start to finish. Nerve agents – above all “military grade nerve agents” – were designed as battlefield weapons. They do not leave opponents fighting fit for hours. There is no description in the scientific literature of a nerve agent having this extraordinary time bomb effect. This is from the Scientific American publication Unlike traditional poisons, nerve agents don’t need to be added to food and drink to be effective. They are quite volatile, colourless liquids (except VX, said to resemble engine oil). The concentration in the vapour at room temperature is lethal. The symptoms of poisoning come on quickly, and include chest tightening, difficulty in breathing, and very likely asphyxiation. Associated symptoms include vomiting and massive incontinence. Victims of the Tokyo subway attack were reported to be bringing up blood. Kim Jong-nam died in less than 20 minutes. Eventually, you die either through asphyxiation or cardiac arrest. While Vladimir Putin and his government are not beyond criticism – in fact, far from it – their misdeeds pale in comparison to the record of Western governments in destroying one country after the other in the Middle East. The media's nonsense about Putin having expansionist aims is an attempt to throw a smokescreen over the West’s own expansionist agenda in Eastern Europe with the goal of throwing a cordon sanitaire around Russia in pursuit of a cold war agenda. As I've said before it makes no sense at all from Russia's pont of view. “Comrade Putin, we have successfully stockpiled novichoks in secret for ten years, and kept them hidden from the OPCW inspectors. We have also trained our agents in secret novichok assassination techniques. The programme has cost hundreds of millions of dollars, but now we are ready. Naturally, the first time we use it we will expose our secret and suffer massive international blowback. So who should be our first target? The head of a foreign intelligence agency? A leading jihadist rebel in Syria? A key nuclear scientist? Even a Head of State?” “No, Tovarich. There is this old retired guy I know living in Salisbury. We released him from jail years ago…” Wake up people and look what our neocon government is doing before it's too late. Start reading beyond the mainstream media that is all controlled by the establishment. No? No evidence that the Russians have done it before? Tell that to Markov and Litvinyenko. Novichok is Russian/USSR. If you believe that not to be the case, then which country to you believe invented it. If you believe that Skripal wasn't a spy, what do you think his conviction was for? If you believe that his daughter isn't a Russian citizen, then where do you think she is a citizen? " Im struggling to understand why you believe that because an item was invented by a particular country then it must have been deployed by said country. As it happens, it was invented in the Soviet Union, in a lab which is now in Uzbekistan. It has also been synthesised in Iran...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from...." You said that PD hadn't said it was military grade, you now have a direct quote saying just that. Will you be man enough to admit your mistake? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from.... You said that PD hadn't said it was military grade, you now have a direct quote saying just that. Will you be man enough to admit your mistake? " Will you be "man enough" to admit you have difficulty reading/understanding basic syntax? I didn't mention what Porton Down had said about the grade of the nerve agent. I merely pointed out that for a military grade nerve agent it seems to be remarkably ineffective. You'd have thought that if it had been a state sponsored Russian hit, they would at least have killed the target, no? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from.... You said that PD hadn't said it was military grade, you now have a direct quote saying just that. Will you be man enough to admit your mistake? Will you be "man enough" to admit you have difficulty reading/understanding basic syntax? I didn't mention what Porton Down had said about the grade of the nerve agent. I merely pointed out that for a military grade nerve agent it seems to be remarkably ineffective. You'd have thought that if it had been a state sponsored Russian hit, they would at least have killed the target, no?" You: [Do] You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? Me: That's what porton down have said... You: No, they haven't, this is the point. Me: (providing quote from Porton Down) "It’s a military-grade nerve agent" It's pretty clear. Why don't you just put your hands up and admit you got it wrong? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from.... You said that PD hadn't said it was military grade, you now have a direct quote saying just that. Will you be man enough to admit your mistake? Will you be "man enough" to admit you have difficulty reading/understanding basic syntax? I didn't mention what Porton Down had said about the grade of the nerve agent. I merely pointed out that for a military grade nerve agent it seems to be remarkably ineffective. You'd have thought that if it had been a state sponsored Russian hit, they would at least have killed the target, no? You: [Do] You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? Me: That's what porton down have said... You: No, they haven't, this is the point. Me: (providing quote from Porton Down) "It’s a military-grade nerve agent" It's pretty clear. Why don't you just put your hands up and admit you got it wrong? " I didn't say that. Go back and read it again.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from.... You said that PD hadn't said it was military grade, you now have a direct quote saying just that. Will you be man enough to admit your mistake? Will you be "man enough" to admit you have difficulty reading/understanding basic syntax? I didn't mention what Porton Down had said about the grade of the nerve agent. I merely pointed out that for a military grade nerve agent it seems to be remarkably ineffective. You'd have thought that if it had been a state sponsored Russian hit, they would at least have killed the target, no? You: [Do] You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? Me: That's what porton down have said... You: No, they haven't, this is the point. Me: (providing quote from Porton Down) "It’s a military-grade nerve agent" It's pretty clear. Why don't you just put your hands up and admit you got it wrong? I didn't say that. Go back and read it again...." You did! Keep digging! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from.... You said that PD hadn't said it was military grade, you now have a direct quote saying just that. Will you be man enough to admit your mistake? Will you be "man enough" to admit you have difficulty reading/understanding basic syntax? I didn't mention what Porton Down had said about the grade of the nerve agent. I merely pointed out that for a military grade nerve agent it seems to be remarkably ineffective. You'd have thought that if it had been a state sponsored Russian hit, they would at least have killed the target, no? You: [Do] You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? Me: That's what porton down have said... You: No, they haven't, this is the point. Me: (providing quote from Porton Down) "It’s a military-grade nerve agent" It's pretty clear. Why don't you just put your hands up and admit you got it wrong? I didn't say that. Go back and read it again.... You did! Keep digging! " Read my post again. There are two sentences. Read the second. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The OP is a huge Putin fanboi, of course he wouldn't see any link to Russia, despite the fact that Russia has done it before, the nerve agent was Russian and the attack was on a Russian spy and a Russian citizen. How do you know it was the Russians when even a specialized lab cannot identify the origin ? Do you have any special trustworthy sources no one else has ? like BoJo? Assuming the Russians where really behind it, how do you get this stuff into the country when even bringing more then 100 ml of cosmetics gets you into trouble . Did they land it with a helicopter , bypassing airspace security? Or shipped it in with a drone ? Seriously , the guy was a double agent and i guess the list of enemies he made in that career is long , from other spies he delivered to one or the other side over mobsters etc. I would assume that the Russian secret service is professional enough to take anyone out, and if the Russians really had the intend to kill him, they would have done so, not leaving any chance to recover .... Rejecting the victims family to visit him? Why? Could he or his daughter say anything which makes current embarrassing situation worse? Some one mentioned above global politics is a big chess game . I agree, and Putin is known as being an extremely good chess player The nerve agent is Russian, who do you think invented it if not the Russians/USSR? I would assume they brought it in via diplomatic pouch, also, plane is not the only way in and out of the country, there are ferries and even a train. Rejecting the family because they may be pressured by the Russian state. Perhaps you should be asking yourself why the daughter is refusing to see the Russian embassy staff. If I was nearly killed in a nerve agent attack in some foreign land, I would be very keen of some consular assistance from the British government. Why isn't she? Could it be because she thinks her own government just tried to kill her? so by your way of thinking whoever invented guns are the ones who committed every gun crime? Has ever occurred to you that this agent probably can be made in different labs around the world? . It took the uk government 45 mins to discover a never agent that is not ment to be discovered ..how is this possible unless you have major knowledge about said never agent? I said that the USSR (Now Russia) invented novichok, they did. That's no more controversial than saying Italy invented pizza. Other countries COULD have produced the specimens used in this attack, no one has said otherwise, but who, and Why? Do Russia have motive? Yes Do they have opportunity? Yes Do Russia have a history of assassinations of spies in this country? Yes This is the point that you are spectactularly missing. Maybe read a book about the Soviet Empire. Moldova, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Russia, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Ukraine are the former USSR. Add to that satellites - Czecheslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Belarus..... Yes, well done, you can read Wikipedia. What happened to all the nuclear weapons when the USSR came to and end? They were all sent TO RUSSIA. Wanna have a guess at what happened to their chemical weapons? It doesn't matter - all that matters is that the others still knew how to make them. Making nerve agents isn't a large scale industrial process like making nuclear missiles.... As I said, it's like saying a diesel engine must have come from Germany.... No, it's nothing like that at all. If you think novichok is so easy to make to military standards, then why don't you knock up a batch? After that you can see of you can make all the components, from scratch, required to make a diesel engine in your garage. You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? The dude is still alive..... That's what porton down have said, but Nah, I'm sure you know more and have done extensive tests on the samples provided to you. No, they haven't, this is the point. They have said they couldn't know where it was made... Also - as I said, he isn't dead. It's a botch job. Speaking to Sky News, Aitkenhead said it was not possible for scientists alone to say precisely where the novichok had been created. He said: “It’s a military-grade nerve agent, which requires extremely sophisticated methods in order to create – something that’s probably only within the capabilities of a state actor.” https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/apr/03/porton-down-experts-unable-to-verify-precise-source-of-novichok Let's see if you are man enough to admit your mistake. FFS - he's not dead. Did they make it properly? It seems not. Also as I've said many times...which state? There's a lot of post-soviet states to choose from.... You said that PD hadn't said it was military grade, you now have a direct quote saying just that. Will you be man enough to admit your mistake? Will you be "man enough" to admit you have difficulty reading/understanding basic syntax? I didn't mention what Porton Down had said about the grade of the nerve agent. I merely pointed out that for a military grade nerve agent it seems to be remarkably ineffective. You'd have thought that if it had been a state sponsored Russian hit, they would at least have killed the target, no? You: [Do] You think the Salisbury agent was made to millitary standards? Me: That's what porton down have said... You: No, they haven't, this is the point. Me: (providing quote from Porton Down) "It’s a military-grade nerve agent" It's pretty clear. Why don't you just put your hands up and admit you got it wrong? I didn't say that. Go back and read it again.... You did! Keep digging! Read my post again. There are two sentences. Read the second." Keep digging, you've made a fool of yourself, it's clear as day, now you are pretending that you didn't say it. People fuck up, they make mistakes, just hold your hands up and say so. Or are you going to pretend that the conversation was about porton down saying that they guy was dead? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...to distill this stupidity- it boils down to two words- one is 'standard' , the other 'grade'. Not the same. Could the nerve agent have been made in any other other USSR countries? Does UK have the technology, since it can identify agents so quickly? Is the fact no-one is dead mean it's down to luck? And cctv in the area of the home? Will we ever know? Only question I can answer is the last one, and that's a negative." Well, the lab it was invented in was in Uzbekistan. Given that the USSR operated as one entity at the time of it's invention, it is entirely conceivable that some of the scientists who worked on it were not Russian. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd have thought so, too although I'd guess it's not a technology to be left behind. But who knows? Also, the UK wouldn't have actually needed to have manufacturing capability since a compound can be identified by its components- if it had been manufactured to sub-optimum standard, that might be picked up depending on the structure ? Although Chemistry was part of my degree, nerve agents were never discussed, funnily enough. " It was part of mine too (not nerve agents, chemistry). I guess it might, but who are we to know what sub-optimum standard is. I was looking at it from the other end, in a "proof of the pudding" way. I'm relatively convinced that if Russia wished to assassinate someone, it could, successfully. In the Case of Salisbury, whoever attempted it, failed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd have thought so, too although I'd guess it's not a technology to be left behind. But who knows? Also, the UK wouldn't have actually needed to have manufacturing capability since a compound can be identified by its components- if it had been manufactured to sub-optimum standard, that might be picked up depending on the structure ? Although Chemistry was part of my degree, nerve agents were never discussed, funnily enough. It was part of mine too (not nerve agents, chemistry). I guess it might, but who are we to know what sub-optimum standard is. I was looking at it from the other end, in a "proof of the pudding" way. I'm relatively convinced that if Russia wished to assassinate someone, it could, successfully. In the Case of Salisbury, whoever attempted it, failed. " Usually competent people do screw up from time to time. And what about Litvenenko- where did that polonium come from? Could have been from many different places but we kinda know, dont we? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So BoJo is claiming that an official request for a diplomatic audience is a distraction. that would be the same sort of distraction that has been the starting flag to many a war." Who do you think is going to start a shooting war with us? Putin's Russia will continue to mess around with us as much as it can as long as it can get away with it, and they may well continue to chip away at their close neighbours' borders if they dont tow the line, but they are not completely stupid to start a war they have no hope of winning. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Like we have any chance of beating Russia lol" At football? seriously, do you think Russia would have the capability to invade the United Kingdom? Their aircraft carriers are mainly museum pieces or theme parks in China. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who do you think is going to start a shooting war with us? Putin's Russia will continue to mess around with us as much as it can as long as it can get away with it, and they may well continue to chip away at their close neighbours' borders if they dont tow the line, but they are not completely stupid to start a war they have no hope of winning. " So just to be clear you think the man who gave his generals authorisation to use nuclear weapons if there was any retaliation after he shot down a passenger jet over Ukraine is not ruthless enough to play the odds and gamble that his stooge in the white house will do nothing and attack the UK if given an excuse? I have to say, I would not be as confident as you with that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd have thought so, too although I'd guess it's not a technology to be left behind. But who knows? Also, the UK wouldn't have actually needed to have manufacturing capability since a compound can be identified by its components- if it had been manufactured to sub-optimum standard, that might be picked up depending on the structure ? Although Chemistry was part of my degree, nerve agents were never discussed, funnily enough. It was part of mine too (not nerve agents, chemistry). I guess it might, but who are we to know what sub-optimum standard is. I was looking at it from the other end, in a "proof of the pudding" way. I'm relatively convinced that if Russia wished to assassinate someone, it could, successfully. In the Case of Salisbury, whoever attempted it, failed. " And if Putin's intent was to show any enemies, or potential enemies that if you fuck with him, they will regret it, he has succeeded. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'd have thought so, too although I'd guess it's not a technology to be left behind. But who knows? Also, the UK wouldn't have actually needed to have manufacturing capability since a compound can be identified by its components- if it had been manufactured to sub-optimum standard, that might be picked up depending on the structure ? Although Chemistry was part of my degree, nerve agents were never discussed, funnily enough. It was part of mine too (not nerve agents, chemistry). I guess it might, but who are we to know what sub-optimum standard is. I was looking at it from the other end, in a "proof of the pudding" way. I'm relatively convinced that if Russia wished to assassinate someone, it could, successfully. In the Case of Salisbury, whoever attempted it, failed. Usually competent people do screw up from time to time. And what about Litvenenko- where did that polonium come from? Could have been from many different places but we kinda know, dont we?" Well Sir Robert Owen's public inquiry found that Litvinenko was killed by two Russian agents, Andrei Lugovoi and Dmitry Kovtun and that there was a "strong probability" they were acting on behalf of the Russian FSB secret service. Paragraph 10.6 of the report stated: "The FSB operation to kill Mr Litvinenko was probably approved by Mr Patrushev and also by President Putin." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who do you think is going to start a shooting war with us? Putin's Russia will continue to mess around with us as much as it can as long as it can get away with it, and they may well continue to chip away at their close neighbours' borders if they dont tow the line, but they are not completely stupid to start a war they have no hope of winning. So just to be clear you think the man who gave his generals authorisation to use nuclear weapons if there was any retaliation after he shot down a passenger jet over Ukraine is not ruthless enough to play the odds and gamble that his stooge in the white house will do nothing and attack the UK if given an excuse? I have to say, I would not be as confident as you with that." Very confident, because although he is a thug, he is not stupid, and as one of the wealthiest men in the world he has a lot to lose. Offensive wars nowadays are virtually unwinnable unless your superiority is massive. He is already trying very hard to help his mate Assad in Syria win against a ragtag militia, and not succeeding very quickly. If you are talking about a nuclear strike which is the only sort of war he could potentially win, then I think it would take a bit more provocation then sending home a few of his spies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Very confident, because although he is a thug, he is not stupid, and as one of the wealthiest men in the world he has a lot to lose. Offensive wars nowadays are virtually unwinnable unless your superiority is massive. He is already trying very hard to help his mate Assad in Syria win against a ragtag militia, and not succeeding very quickly. If you are talking about a nuclear strike which is the only sort of war he could potentially win, then I think it would take a bit more provocation then sending home a few of his spies. " You so underestimate Russia's military capabilities, and totally misunderstand what is happening in Syria. Russia has transformed itself into a siege economy and historically siege economies lead to wars. As for Syria Russia are not trying to win anything, they are enabling Asad to kill all his opponents. That war will not finish until all opposition is dead. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...to distill this stupidity- it boils down to two words- one is 'standard' , the other 'grade'. Not the same. Could the nerve agent have been made in any other other USSR countries? Does UK have the technology, since it can identify agents so quickly? Is the fact no-one is dead mean it's down to luck? And cctv in the area of the home? Will we ever know? Only question I can answer is the last one, and that's a negative. Well, the lab it was invented in was in Uzbekistan. Given that the USSR operated as one entity at the time of it's invention, it is entirely conceivable that some of the scientists who worked on it were not Russian. " One of the scientists who invented Novichock now lives in the USA. He was Interviewed on sky news at his home in America. He has the knowledge about the formula and how to make it. Any number of scientists who developed this nerve agent could now be living all over the globe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...to distill this stupidity- it boils down to two words- one is 'standard' , the other 'grade'. Not the same. Could the nerve agent have been made in any other other USSR countries? Does UK have the technology, since it can identify agents so quickly? Is the fact no-one is dead mean it's down to luck? And cctv in the area of the home? Will we ever know? Only question I can answer is the last one, and that's a negative. Well, the lab it was invented in was in Uzbekistan. Given that the USSR operated as one entity at the time of it's invention, it is entirely conceivable that some of the scientists who worked on it were not Russian. One of the scientists who invented Novichock now lives in the USA. He was Interviewed on sky news at his home in America. He has the knowledge about the formula and how to make it. Any number of scientists who developed this nerve agent could now be living all over the globe. " They may know the recipe but why would they make it, and then use it to try kill a former Russian spy who switched sides? Polonium is also available in different countries but there is little doubt who killed Litvenenko | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"So...to distill this stupidity- it boils down to two words- one is 'standard' , the other 'grade'. Not the same. Could the nerve agent have been made in any other other USSR countries? Does UK have the technology, since it can identify agents so quickly? Is the fact no-one is dead mean it's down to luck? And cctv in the area of the home? Will we ever know? Only question I can answer is the last one, and that's a negative. Well, the lab it was invented in was in Uzbekistan. Given that the USSR operated as one entity at the time of it's invention, it is entirely conceivable that some of the scientists who worked on it were not Russian. One of the scientists who invented Novichock now lives in the USA. He was Interviewed on sky news at his home in America. He has the knowledge about the formula and how to make it. Any number of scientists who developed this nerve agent could now be living all over the globe. They may know the recipe but why would they make it, and then use it to try kill a former Russian spy who switched sides? Polonium is also available in different countries but there is little doubt who killed Litvenenko " . Could you tell us why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We need to be careful ? We've made this bed ! We should have helped and supported Russia more after the fall of communism instead of just taking advantage of Russias weakness at the time ! A bit like the allies after the First World War , and look what happened ! " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest." . I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice" So what would it take for you to think Russia/Putin was involved in this? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice" Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube?" . No I think your a complete tool sheeple if you think there independent, that's just some bullshit the state has used for decades to put peoples fears at ease | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube?. No I think your a complete tool sheeple if you think there independent, that's just some bullshit the state has used for decades to put peoples fears at ease" * they are So how do we get to the truth? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube?. No I think your a complete tool sheeple if you think there independent, that's just some bullshit the state has used for decades to put peoples fears at ease * they are So how do we get to the truth? " . If you say so! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube?. No I think your a complete tool sheeple if you think there independent, that's just some bullshit the state has used for decades to put peoples fears at ease * they are So how do we get to the truth? . If you say so! " No, I was correcting your spelling | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube?. No I think your a complete tool sheeple if you think there independent, that's just some bullshit the state has used for decades to put peoples fears at ease * they are So how do we get to the truth? . If you say so! No, I was correcting your spelling " . There's a meddle in it for you mutley | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube?. No I think your a complete tool sheeple if you think there independent, that's just some bullshit the state has used for decades to put peoples fears at ease * they are So how do we get to the truth? . If you say so! No, I was correcting your spelling . There's a meddle in it for you mutley " So how do we find out who did it? Is Russia denying that they did it more credible that the UK claiming that they did? There seems to have been enough information to convince other countries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why there is little doubt? Perhaps read the summary of the inquest.. I don't trust state inquests in these matters, they have prejudice Thats why it's an independent inquiry, and not run by the state. If you don't believe the state, or the independent inquiry, how do you think the truth should be discovered? Through YouTube?. No I think your a complete tool sheeple if you think there independent, that's just some bullshit the state has used for decades to put peoples fears at ease * they are So how do we get to the truth? . If you say so! No, I was correcting your spelling . There's a meddle in it for you mutley So how do we find out who did it? Is Russia denying that they did it more credible that the UK claiming that they did? There seems to have been enough information to convince other countries." . We don't, all states have there own agendas which usually entails looking after the state interests!. Decent honest media would help but let's face facts, they all wrapped that up decades ago, there's still some very good independent journalism done but alas it's usually months if not years before any real truths emerge. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power" Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life." . It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out " Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?" . No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?. No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests" That sounds like an over-simplification to me. Of course they meddled. As did Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel... You absolutely cannot say what would have happened in Syria. Why could there not have been a home grown civil war or coup? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?. No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests That sounds like an over-simplification to me. Of course they meddled. As did Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel... You absolutely cannot say what would have happened in Syria. Why could there not have been a home grown civil war or coup?" . I just did . Assad would have crushed any rebellion like he has done for decades and like his dad did before that, we weren't happy with that so know we've got a complete all out bloody civil war and which frankly will only end with either the capitulation of one side or the other!.. We know this, we've seen it born out in Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya, the US even stated it as the reason for not invading Iraq after the first gulf war. Bombing Assad will only prolong an already disastrous civil war of our own making... But that is western foreign policy in the end | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?. No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests That sounds like an over-simplification to me. Of course they meddled. As did Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel... You absolutely cannot say what would have happened in Syria. Why could there not have been a home grown civil war or coup?. I just did . Assad would have crushed any rebellion like he has done for decades and like his dad did before that, we weren't happy with that so know we've got a complete all out bloody civil war and which frankly will only end with either the capitulation of one side or the other!.. We know this, we've seen it born out in Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya, the US even stated it as the reason for not invading Iraq after the first gulf war. Bombing Assad will only prolong an already disastrous civil war of our own making... But that is western foreign policy in the end" That's just an assertion on your part. I assume that western forces have trained the rebels just as Russian and Iranians have supported Assad from day 1. I'm sure you have excellent sources to tell you how the uprising started and why it snowballed. Beyond speculation of course. Our Parliament's decision not to support further intervention made any deeper US involvement impossible at a point where Assad would have been defeated until Russia stepped in with Iran. I don't know what level of support any uprising actually had in Syria. Do you? Are you saying it would all have turned out "OK" if Assad had turned his weapons on his people? Nothing would have changed because nothing ever changes? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?. No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests That sounds like an over-simplification to me. Of course they meddled. As did Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel... You absolutely cannot say what would have happened in Syria. Why could there not have been a home grown civil war or coup?. I just did . Assad would have crushed any rebellion like he has done for decades and like his dad did before that, we weren't happy with that so know we've got a complete all out bloody civil war and which frankly will only end with either the capitulation of one side or the other!.. We know this, we've seen it born out in Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya, the US even stated it as the reason for not invading Iraq after the first gulf war. Bombing Assad will only prolong an already disastrous civil war of our own making... But that is western foreign policy in the end That's just an assertion on your part. I assume that western forces have trained the rebels just as Russian and Iranians have supported Assad from day 1. I'm sure you have excellent sources to tell you how the uprising started and why it snowballed. Beyond speculation of course. Our Parliament's decision not to support further intervention made any deeper US involvement impossible at a point where Assad would have been defeated until Russia stepped in with Iran. I don't know what level of support any uprising actually had in Syria. Do you? Are you saying it would all have turned out "OK" if Assad had turned his weapons on his people? Nothing would have changed because nothing ever changes? " . US involvement impossible? Lol the CIA are still training and supplying "rebels" today!, They admit this themselves. I don't think it would have turned out ok, I think it would have turned out better than this option though, the middle East is a tender bed of religious and tribal sects that have been mashed together for decades through strong arm dictatorships the best and only way is for a natural long term evolvement into democracy, although to be fair to Syria they were far further down that road than most, removing Assad solved no problems but added loads to the equation | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"50 murders in London is unfortunately a minor issue next to the attempted murder of the Skripals. Fact is one is about an increase in teen gang killings in the capital and is a matter of policing. The other is a matter of utmost international importance because the accusation is that Russia has used a banned chemical agent on British soil to attempt to kill a former spy and therefore committed an act of war against the British people. Like it or not, any story that has the potential of starting a war against a nuclear power that's leadership has shown a willingness to do anything to win tops a few gang killings every day of the week. Can you give me one example of how putin plotting to kill this russian (who has served time for his crime) with a chemical agent that would point straight back to the russian goverment instead of a simple assassination by other means especially at time of a re-election. There simply isnt one at all that would make any sense what so ever. As ive said the only people to benefit from this is those that have it in for russia. What ever you may think of putin he just isnt that dumb of a person. " TROLL ALERT! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"50 murders in London is unfortunately a minor issue next to the attempted murder of the Skripals. Fact is one is about an increase in teen gang killings in the capital and is a matter of policing. The other is a matter of utmost international importance because the accusation is that Russia has used a banned chemical agent on British soil to attempt to kill a former spy and therefore committed an act of war against the British people. Like it or not, any story that has the potential of starting a war against a nuclear power that's leadership has shown a willingness to do anything to win tops a few gang killings every day of the week. Can you give me one example of how putin plotting to kill this russian (who has served time for his crime) with a chemical agent that would point straight back to the russian goverment instead of a simple assassination by other means especially at time of a re-election. There simply isnt one at all that would make any sense what so ever. As ive said the only people to benefit from this is those that have it in for russia. What ever you may think of putin he just isnt that dumb of a person. TROLL ALERT!" Thats all you have to contribute to a debate? Do us all a favour and trot of back to the General forums as your adding absolutely nothing here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?. No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests That sounds like an over-simplification to me. Of course they meddled. As did Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel... You absolutely cannot say what would have happened in Syria. Why could there not have been a home grown civil war or coup?. I just did . Assad would have crushed any rebellion like he has done for decades and like his dad did before that, we weren't happy with that so know we've got a complete all out bloody civil war and which frankly will only end with either the capitulation of one side or the other!.. We know this, we've seen it born out in Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya, the US even stated it as the reason for not invading Iraq after the first gulf war. Bombing Assad will only prolong an already disastrous civil war of our own making... But that is western foreign policy in the end That's just an assertion on your part. I assume that western forces have trained the rebels just as Russian and Iranians have supported Assad from day 1. I'm sure you have excellent sources to tell you how the uprising started and why it snowballed. Beyond speculation of course. Our Parliament's decision not to support further intervention made any deeper US involvement impossible at a point where Assad would have been defeated until Russia stepped in with Iran. I don't know what level of support any uprising actually had in Syria. Do you? Are you saying it would all have turned out "OK" if Assad had turned his weapons on his people? Nothing would have changed because nothing ever changes? . US involvement impossible? Lol the CIA are still training and supplying "rebels" today!, They admit this themselves. I don't think it would have turned out ok, I think it would have turned out better than this option though, the middle East is a tender bed of religious and tribal sects that have been mashed together for decades through strong arm dictatorships the best and only way is for a natural long term evolvement into democracy, although to be fair to Syria they were far further down that road than most, removing Assad solved no problems but added loads to the equation" Pedant. Overt US involvement impossible to the extent the outcome could have been changed. Did you miss the part about Russia bombing everything? Syria is a proxy war with multiple countries involved yet you've chosen to blame the West. Any reason? You don't actually know what happened any more than I did do you? Why pretend. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?. No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests That sounds like an over-simplification to me. Of course they meddled. As did Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel... You absolutely cannot say what would have happened in Syria. Why could there not have been a home grown civil war or coup?. I just did . Assad would have crushed any rebellion like he has done for decades and like his dad did before that, we weren't happy with that so know we've got a complete all out bloody civil war and which frankly will only end with either the capitulation of one side or the other!.. We know this, we've seen it born out in Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya, the US even stated it as the reason for not invading Iraq after the first gulf war. Bombing Assad will only prolong an already disastrous civil war of our own making... But that is western foreign policy in the end That's just an assertion on your part. I assume that western forces have trained the rebels just as Russian and Iranians have supported Assad from day 1. I'm sure you have excellent sources to tell you how the uprising started and why it snowballed. Beyond speculation of course. Our Parliament's decision not to support further intervention made any deeper US involvement impossible at a point where Assad would have been defeated until Russia stepped in with Iran. I don't know what level of support any uprising actually had in Syria. Do you? Are you saying it would all have turned out "OK" if Assad had turned his weapons on his people? Nothing would have changed because nothing ever changes? . US involvement impossible? Lol the CIA are still training and supplying "rebels" today!, They admit this themselves. I don't think it would have turned out ok, I think it would have turned out better than this option though, the middle East is a tender bed of religious and tribal sects that have been mashed together for decades through strong arm dictatorships the best and only way is for a natural long term evolvement into democracy, although to be fair to Syria they were far further down that road than most, removing Assad solved no problems but added loads to the equation Pedant. Overt US involvement impossible to the extent the outcome could have been changed. Did you miss the part about Russia bombing everything? Syria is a proxy war with multiple countries involved yet you've chosen to blame the West. Any reason? You don't actually know what happened any more than I did do you? Why pretend." . No it's fucking not, that's just western nonsense, Syria is for all intents and purposes fighting a war against terrorists, pretty much all of which are far worse than Assad, there in a guerrilla warfare in urban streets, the terrorists have been shown to use civilians as shields, have chemical weapons, mass murders in hospitals and schools, the West has ZERO journalists even in Syria let alone the war zones, the only credible journalists reporting are quickly dismissed as RT flunkies without ever actually looking at their reports. There's 1000s of recorded interviews of Syrians being freed by Syrian army forces telling the world how fucking happy they are to be freed from these so called rebels who've brutalised them far worse than Assad ever has done. . So no, Assad isn't my ideal candidate to run Syria but he's fucking way better than the lunatic terrorists who are being funded alot by western tax payers money FFS. The same people who murdered teenage girls in Manchester and stabbed people and police in London are the very same "rebels" who we seem happy to fucking fund to do that in Syria. This is mass madness on some sort of delusional scale of wilful stupidity and ignorance by you not me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Part of trump's appeal was his narrative that he would no longer get the USA meddling in foreign wars or problems, most people are sick to the back teeth of spending hundreds of millions sorting out foreign problems while they have problems in they're own country's. Wether trump meant it or not he's soon changed his tune once in power Ignoring "foreign" conflicts can just as easily negatively impact your country thousands of miles away as involving yourself in them directly. There are no simple answers. Those who offer them are no more trustworthy than anyone else. The reality of any nation functioning in the world is extremely complex. Most people don't like complexity. They want to live their own lives in blissful ignorance. I would happily too except I think much of what is happening is going to negatively impact my life.. It's not ignoring it, it's just not involving yourself in it, there's plenty of diplomatic and UN ways to help in foreign problems. It's really not that complex to me, the West should cease meddling in other countries problems and better still, stop creating the problem in the first place!. Take Syria for instance, I don't like Assad,I think he's an awful leader but he is actually liked by a majority of Syrian people, there's a bloody awful civil war going on and civil wars tend to be the bloodiest and leave the most bitterness,I don't want to prop Assad up but then I don't want to bomb him either, it's for Syrians to sort Syrian problems out, instead of the West spending hundreds and hundreds of millions bombing these so called dictators let's just put the money into use on UN refugee camps instead, let's get UN peace keepers in place as soon as it's possible in the Syrian cities where cease fires come in. There is things we can do as part of the UN. War is a racket and it's profits are far too big for states to remain neutral. Tax doesn't have to be taxing, they just make it that way so your confused enough to go along with the bullshit the centrist war mongers trot out Are you saying that if there had been no foreign involvement in Syria that there would have no consequences for neighbouring states extending as far as the UK through refugees?. No I'm saying if there hadn't been foreign meddling I the first place, there wouldn't be a civil war in Syria. The CIA have already admitted they trained and armed "Syrian rebels" for reasons of the USAs interests That sounds like an over-simplification to me. Of course they meddled. As did Russia, Turkey, Iran, Israel... You absolutely cannot say what would have happened in Syria. Why could there not have been a home grown civil war or coup?. I just did . Assad would have crushed any rebellion like he has done for decades and like his dad did before that, we weren't happy with that so know we've got a complete all out bloody civil war and which frankly will only end with either the capitulation of one side or the other!.. We know this, we've seen it born out in Iraq and Afghanistan and Libya, the US even stated it as the reason for not invading Iraq after the first gulf war. Bombing Assad will only prolong an already disastrous civil war of our own making... But that is western foreign policy in the end That's just an assertion on your part. I assume that western forces have trained the rebels just as Russian and Iranians have supported Assad from day 1. I'm sure you have excellent sources to tell you how the uprising started and why it snowballed. Beyond speculation of course. Our Parliament's decision not to support further intervention made any deeper US involvement impossible at a point where Assad would have been defeated until Russia stepped in with Iran. I don't know what level of support any uprising actually had in Syria. Do you? Are you saying it would all have turned out "OK" if Assad had turned his weapons on his people? Nothing would have changed because nothing ever changes? . US involvement impossible? Lol the CIA are still training and supplying "rebels" today!, They admit this themselves. I don't think it would have turned out ok, I think it would have turned out better than this option though, the middle East is a tender bed of religious and tribal sects that have been mashed together for decades through strong arm dictatorships the best and only way is for a natural long term evolvement into democracy, although to be fair to Syria they were far further down that road than most, removing Assad solved no problems but added loads to the equation Pedant. Overt US involvement impossible to the extent the outcome could have been changed. Did you miss the part about Russia bombing everything? Syria is a proxy war with multiple countries involved yet you've chosen to blame the West. Any reason? You don't actually know what happened any more than I did do you? Why pretend.. No it's fucking not, that's just western nonsense, Syria is for all intents and purposes fighting a war against terrorists, pretty much all of which are far worse than Assad, there in a guerrilla warfare in urban streets, the terrorists have been shown to use civilians as shields, have chemical weapons, mass murders in hospitals and schools, the West has ZERO journalists even in Syria let alone the war zones, the only credible journalists reporting are quickly dismissed as RT flunkies without ever actually looking at their reports. There's 1000s of recorded interviews of Syrians being freed by Syrian army forces telling the world how fucking happy they are to be freed from these so called rebels who've brutalised them far worse than Assad ever has done. . So no, Assad isn't my ideal candidate to run Syria but he's fucking way better than the lunatic terrorists who are being funded alot by western tax payers money FFS. The same people who murdered teenage girls in Manchester and stabbed people and police in London are the very same "rebels" who we seem happy to fucking fund to do that in Syria. This is mass madness on some sort of delusional scale of wilful stupidity and ignorance by you not me" agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone see the former ambassador to Kazakhstan on BBC? Apparently scientists who worked on Novochok came from all over the USSR (including Ukrane) and the facility was dismantled by the Americans. Knowledge of how to make it isn't limited to Russia. What's to stop the Ukraine from having carried out the attack to bring the wrath of the world upon Russia? After all, it might stop Russia trying to annex the Crimea for a while..." What did the OPCW say? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone see the former ambassador to Kazakhstan on BBC? Apparently scientists who worked on Novochok came from all over the USSR (including Ukrane) and the facility was dismantled by the Americans. Knowledge of how to make it isn't limited to Russia. What's to stop the Ukraine from having carried out the attack to bring the wrath of the world upon Russia? After all, it might stop Russia trying to annex the Crimea for a while... What did the OPCW say? " They confirmed it was Novochok. The Home office (not the OPCW) then said that it proved beyond all doubt that Russia did it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyone see the former ambassador to Kazakhstan on BBC? Apparently scientists who worked on Novochok came from all over the USSR (including Ukrane) and the facility was dismantled by the Americans. Knowledge of how to make it isn't limited to Russia. What's to stop the Ukraine from having carried out the attack to bring the wrath of the world upon Russia? After all, it might stop Russia trying to annex the Crimea for a while..." . I know two chemists who work for Astrazeneca,I asked them out of curiosity, one was very hesitant to say anything, the other just turned round and said I could make novichok tomorrow in the lab he works in in Astrazeneca, it's neither hard or complicated to do and pretty much is his every day job synthesising chemical agents! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I know two chemists who work for Astrazeneca,I asked them out of curiosity, one was very hesitant to say anything, the other just turned round and said I could make novichok tomorrow in the lab he works in in Astrazeneca, it's neither hard or complicated to do and pretty much is his every day job synthesising chemical agents!" I take it he works in Alderley Park, next time you see him ask if he would be as confident testing or packaging for use the substance he systasised in anything lower than a CL3 or 4 lab environment. Then ask how many CL 3 and 4 labs are in the UK? The fact is with chemical weapons it not technically difficult to synthesise the chemicals, the problem is safe handling and containment. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I know two chemists who work for Astrazeneca,I asked them out of curiosity, one was very hesitant to say anything, the other just turned round and said I could make novichok tomorrow in the lab he works in in Astrazeneca, it's neither hard or complicated to do and pretty much is his every day job synthesising chemical agents! I take it he works in Alderley Park, next time you see him ask if he would be as confident testing or packaging for use the substance he systasised in anything lower than a CL3 or 4 lab environment. Then ask how many CL 3 and 4 labs are in the UK? The fact is with chemical weapons it not technically difficult to synthesise the chemicals, the problem is safe handling and containment. " . Alderley park no longer exists, they moved them all to Cambridge a few years back, the parks still there but zeneca are pretty much gone, no these two are retired from there but we're about as highly regarded as you can get. You are correct though, he did say it's all about safe handling and the lab set up, oddly enough his wife was less talkative and prodded him throughout the conversation for him to "shut up". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Alderley park no longer exists, they moved them all to Cambridge a few years back, the parks still there but zeneca are pretty much gone, no these two are retired from there but we're about as highly regarded as you can get. You are correct though, he did say it's all about safe handling and the lab set up, oddly enough his wife was less talkative and prodded him throughout the conversation for him to "shut up"." So they did work in Alderley Park, (did they ever invite you to Aldrley Park's pub?) and although it is no longer ICI Pharmaceuticals research facility, it still exists and is still the only CL3 lab outside government or universality research establishments that I know of in the UK (no doubt Astra Zenica (ICI) now have a new one somewhere near Cambridge). By the way I used to know the lady (now dead) who ran the bio-hazard integrity of the toxicology lab (your friends probably knew her, and will definitely know the pub...) for a number of years before moving to what is now Solvey, Warrington Organic Peroxide plant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Throughout this thread these questions do not seem to have been answered. Apologies if they have. What evidence would be adequate with respect to government security agency to be a clear enough indication that they have been involved in any event? What other nation or organisation does anyone actually have any knowledge of that could carry out such an attack or has a reason to do so? Considering that Russia, as a nation, lies blatantly as a matter of policy an admission from them is highly unlikely. " Precisely. And a politician asking for incontovertible proof of Russian involvement before taking action is either stupid or in bed with them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK " Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible." No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either." How about tbe USA invading other countries? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either." You my friend are a victim of western propaganda. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK " . They bribed more than we did, all is fair in love and world cup bidding wars | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Throughout this thread these questions do not seem to have been answered. Apologies if they have. What evidence would be adequate with respect to government security agency to be a clear enough indication that they have been involved in any event? What other nation or organisation does anyone actually have any knowledge of that could carry out such an attack or has a reason to do so? Considering that Russia, as a nation, lies blatantly as a matter of policy an admission from them is highly unlikely. Precisely. And a politician asking for incontovertible proof of Russian involvement before taking action is either stupid or in bed with them " . I'm thinking the same with these brexit talks, why bother with Jibber jabbing and evidence?. Let's just bomb Brussels into regime change!. We've got these new fire and forget it missiles that could take out key Brussels targets like the EU parliament, although we're more likely to get them if we take out the local whore houses but I'm drawing the line at civilian casualties | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either. You my friend are a victim of western propaganda. " And I notice you are a victim of “RT” propaganda my friend... Oh and did you notice that the Russian any Syrians refused to let the OPCW into douma yesterday and actually won’t let them in till tomorrow... and have to be flanked by Russian and Syrian military personnel... and won’t be allowed to wander off by themselves.... So... spin that my friend | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either. You my friend are a victim of western propaganda. " Which part is propaganda? That Putin was always going to win and the elections have been tampered with? That Putin invaded other countries sovreign territory and didnt care about the repercussions? Its always funny how the people who swallow propaganda can never get into the details and just try and fob others off with throwaway lines " How about tbe USA invading other countries? " Or they lean into whataboutism instead of dealing with the subject at hand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK . They bribed more than we did, all is fair in love and world cup bidding wars " But Qatar won it fair and square, right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either. You my friend are a victim of western propaganda. Which part is propaganda? That Putin was always going to win and the elections have been tampered with? That Putin invaded other countries sovreign territory and didnt care about the repercussions? Its always funny how the people who swallow propaganda can never get into the details and just try and fob others off with throwaway lines How about tbe USA invading other countries? Or they lean into whataboutism instead of dealing with the subject at hand." The propaganda of disinformation agsinst the west when infact its the west putting out disinformation about russia (and syria, and iraq, and libya and on and on). And as for russia attacking other countries...you are referring to ukraine right? Where russia took back crimera without a single bullet fired or death? Also crimera people was glad to be part of russia. And why did russia take bsck crimera?... well because ukraine was being compromised and a coup was happening supported by the west...and with crimera being a strategic area they wasnt going to allow the west or nato get even closer to russias borders. So yes you are a victim of western propagander regarding russia invading ukraine and putting out disinformation about the west. When you guys wake up and realise its our own western goverments that are the bad guys then the sooner the better. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either. You my friend are a victim of western propaganda. Which part is propaganda? That Putin was always going to win and the elections have been tampered with? That Putin invaded other countries sovreign territory and didnt care about the repercussions? Its always funny how the people who swallow propaganda can never get into the details and just try and fob others off with throwaway lines How about tbe USA invading other countries? Or they lean into whataboutism instead of dealing with the subject at hand. The propaganda of disinformation agsinst the west when infact its the west putting out disinformation about russia (and syria, and iraq, and libya and on and on). And as for russia attacking other countries...you are referring to ukraine right? Where russia took back crimera without a single bullet fired or death? Also crimera people was glad to be part of russia. And why did russia take bsck crimera?... well because ukraine was being compromised and a coup was happening supported by the west...and with crimera being a strategic area they wasnt going to allow the west or nato get even closer to russias borders. So yes you are a victim of western propagander regarding russia invading ukraine and putting out disinformation about the west. When you guys wake up and realise its our own western goverments that are the bad guys then the sooner the better. " How deluded can you be? What about Georgia, you forgot that, what about eastern Ukraine, also forgot about that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either. You my friend are a victim of western propaganda. Which part is propaganda? That Putin was always going to win and the elections have been tampered with? That Putin invaded other countries sovreign territory and didnt care about the repercussions? Its always funny how the people who swallow propaganda can never get into the details and just try and fob others off with throwaway lines How about tbe USA invading other countries? Or they lean into whataboutism instead of dealing with the subject at hand. The propaganda of disinformation agsinst the west when infact its the west putting out disinformation about russia (and syria, and iraq, and libya and on and on). And as for russia attacking other countries...you are referring to ukraine right? Where russia took back crimera without a single bullet fired or death? Also crimera people was glad to be part of russia. And why did russia take bsck crimera?... well because ukraine was being compromised and a coup was happening supported by the west...and with crimera being a strategic area they wasnt going to allow the west or nato get even closer to russias borders. So yes you are a victim of western propagander regarding russia invading ukraine and putting out disinformation about the west. When you guys wake up and realise its our own western goverments that are the bad guys then the sooner the better. " Where Russia sent in armed troops to take control of strategic sites in Crimea through the threat of murder and destruction and then installed an unelected puppet government they controlled from Moscow. Then held a sham referendum which has not been recognised internationally because there was no time to debate, only 2 options were in the referendum and both meant effectively leaving Ukraine to either be absorbed by Russia or be its vassal state. The campaign for the referendum included violence against pro-Ukraine supporters and censorship of pro Ukraine media and only lasted 10 days. And the uprising against Yanukovych followed him cheating to win the election, embezzling up to 70 billion from his country and ordering his police to open fire on protesters killing 77. Now thats enough detail, because that puts it into context. Armed soldiers, election fraud, murder and theft. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Russian state TV said the skripal nerve agent attack was a false flag operation by the British because they were upset that Russia got to host the world cup over the UK Sounds just as plausible as putin deciding to arrange this guys demise using a chemical novachoc that is widely known that russians produce, during the russian elections and in doing so would cause uproar and more sanctions upon russia. Infact now i think about it....its actually more plausible. No its not. For one thing the elections are a sham. There've been videos shown with ballot stuffing in Russia. No one believed Putin would lose. And why wouldnt Russians use the chemical they produce? Do you expect them to use a chemical weapon they dont produce? Because I dont knownif you heard but the chemical weapon store has really put up its prices lately. And the selection has gone to pot as well. And since when has Putin cared about uproar and sanctions? They havent stopped him waging a disinformation campaign against the west. And it didnt stop him invading other countries either. You my friend are a victim of western propaganda. Which part is propaganda? That Putin was always going to win and the elections have been tampered with? That Putin invaded other countries sovreign territory and didnt care about the repercussions? Its always funny how the people who swallow propaganda can never get into the details and just try and fob others off with throwaway lines How about tbe USA invading other countries? Or they lean into whataboutism instead of dealing with the subject at hand. The propaganda of disinformation agsinst the west when infact its the west putting out disinformation about russia (and syria, and iraq, and libya and on and on). And as for russia attacking other countries...you are referring to ukraine right? Where russia took back crimera without a single bullet fired or death? Also crimera people was glad to be part of russia. And why did russia take bsck crimera?... well because ukraine was being compromised and a coup was happening supported by the west...and with crimera being a strategic area they wasnt going to allow the west or nato get even closer to russias borders. So yes you are a victim of western propagander regarding russia invading ukraine and putting out disinformation about the west. When you guys wake up and realise its our own western goverments that are the bad guys then the sooner the better. Where Russia sent in armed troops to take control of strategic sites in Crimea through the threat of murder and destruction and then installed an unelected puppet government they controlled from Moscow. Then held a sham referendum which has not been recognised internationally because there was no time to debate, only 2 options were in the referendum and both meant effectively leaving Ukraine to either be absorbed by Russia or be its vassal state. The campaign for the referendum included violence against pro-Ukraine supporters and censorship of pro Ukraine media and only lasted 10 days. And the uprising against Yanukovych followed him cheating to win the election, embezzling up to 70 billion from his country and ordering his police to open fire on protesters killing 77. Now thats enough detail, because that puts it into context. Armed soldiers, election fraud, murder and theft." You can also add to that that Russia broke the Geneva conventions on the laws of war by the use of "little green men", Russian military personnel taking part in a military operation, but not wearing the uniform of a state military. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. " So your arguement is not he is good, he's bad, but we are worse? Then why do you have to lie about what Russia does? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. " can I just ask if we are not a force for good in the world can you tell me what does Russia do that’s a force for good in the world ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. " Im Irish, we're neutral. So speak for your own country. And by the way, you literally just did what I said you'd do a few posts earlier. Lose the argument and then start with "whataboutism" where you try and derail the topic at hand and talk about things other people have done instead. The UK have and continue to do some immoral things, but not on the scale of Russia. And considering this is a post about Russia we'll stick to that topic and about their illegal invasions, theyre wide ranging disinformation campaigns, their chemical attacks, their rigged elections, their cyber warfare attacks against us, their corruption and all their other crimes against other countries, their citizens and democracy itself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. Im Irish, we're neutral. So speak for your own country. And by the way, you literally just did what I said you'd do a few posts earlier. Lose the argument and then start with "whataboutism" where you try and derail the topic at hand and talk about things other people have done instead. The UK have and continue to do some immoral things, but not on the scale of Russia. And considering this is a post about Russia we'll stick to that topic and about their illegal invasions, theyre wide ranging disinformation campaigns, their chemical attacks, their rigged elections, their cyber warfare attacks against us, their corruption and all their other crimes against other countries, their citizens and democracy itself." You really are deluded. No ones lost an angument...because its your opinion and its my opinion. Thats all it is my friend. You think your thoughts and opinion is correct where i believe it to be wrong. I think my opinion and thoughts are correct where as you believe them to be wrong. Thats all this is...theres no winning or losing arguments when its basically just two guys opinions that differ. So less of the pedastal standing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. Im Irish, we're neutral. So speak for your own country. And by the way, you literally just did what I said you'd do a few posts earlier. Lose the argument and then start with "whataboutism" where you try and derail the topic at hand and talk about things other people have done instead. The UK have and continue to do some immoral things, but not on the scale of Russia. And considering this is a post about Russia we'll stick to that topic and about their illegal invasions, theyre wide ranging disinformation campaigns, their chemical attacks, their rigged elections, their cyber warfare attacks against us, their corruption and all their other crimes against other countries, their citizens and democracy itself. You really are deluded. No ones lost an angument...because its your opinion and its my opinion. Thats all it is my friend. You think your thoughts and opinion is correct where i believe it to be wrong. I think my opinion and thoughts are correct where as you believe them to be wrong. Thats all this is...theres no winning or losing arguments when its basically just two guys opinions that differ. So less of the pedastal standing." Just lucky for us that people with your thought processes are not in power here, and generally manage to get their responses to Russian aggression right. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. Im Irish, we're neutral. So speak for your own country. And by the way, you literally just did what I said you'd do a few posts earlier. Lose the argument and then start with "whataboutism" where you try and derail the topic at hand and talk about things other people have done instead. The UK have and continue to do some immoral things, but not on the scale of Russia. And considering this is a post about Russia we'll stick to that topic and about their illegal invasions, theyre wide ranging disinformation campaigns, their chemical attacks, their rigged elections, their cyber warfare attacks against us, their corruption and all their other crimes against other countries, their citizens and democracy itself." "Some immoral things"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. Im Irish, we're neutral. So speak for your own country. And by the way, you literally just did what I said you'd do a few posts earlier. Lose the argument and then start with "whataboutism" where you try and derail the topic at hand and talk about things other people have done instead. The UK have and continue to do some immoral things, but not on the scale of Russia. And considering this is a post about Russia we'll stick to that topic and about their illegal invasions, theyre wide ranging disinformation campaigns, their chemical attacks, their rigged elections, their cyber warfare attacks against us, their corruption and all their other crimes against other countries, their citizens and democracy itself. "Some immoral things"? " Well if I mentioned haggis specifically Kinky would string me up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You really are deluded. No ones lost an angument...because its your opinion and its my opinion. Thats all it is my friend. You think your thoughts and opinion is correct where i believe it to be wrong. I think my opinion and thoughts are correct where as you believe them to be wrong. Thats all this is...theres no winning or losing arguments when its basically just two guys opinions that differ. So less of the pedastal standing." An opinion is I like steak better than seafood, I prefer the Blue Album to the Red Album, BoJo's hair is ridiculous. Facts are things like Im Irish, the sun is a star and that Russian elections are rigged so Putin cant lose, Russia invaded Crimea and held a sham referendum and that they are waging a disinformation campaign to sow division in the west targetting the less intelligent and parts of western society with a chip on their shoulder. You should really learn the difference. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This no debating with either of you. When you are wearing your blinkers on and can only see what you want to see (which is how bad and awful russia is). And cant see the crap that your own goverment and its alliances have been doing for decades all around you. Then its a waste of my time even trying to debate with you because you are blind to the terrible things we have done and still doing but because you are living in one of the countrys that are part of the alliance commiting these awful things its ok to just ignore it and sweep it under the carpet. Keep living in ignorance and bliss and being believing we are a force of good in the world. Im Irish, we're neutral. So speak for your own country. And by the way, you literally just did what I said you'd do a few posts earlier. Lose the argument and then start with "whataboutism" where you try and derail the topic at hand and talk about things other people have done instead. The UK have and continue to do some immoral things, but not on the scale of Russia. And considering this is a post about Russia we'll stick to that topic and about their illegal invasions, theyre wide ranging disinformation campaigns, their chemical attacks, their rigged elections, their cyber warfare attacks against us, their corruption and all their other crimes against other countries, their citizens and democracy itself." Irish neutral my arse. You are part of the EU which collectively destabilised the situation in Ukraine by supporting a coup and overthrow of a democratically elected legitimate leader there. The EU (which includes Ireland) sent money to opposition forces there, encouraged Ukraine citizens to otherthrow their democratically elected and legitimate leader, and enticed Ukraine to dump Russia and join the EU, when the EU knew full well it would provoke the Russians and cause disturbance and unrest in Ukraine as many of the citizens who live there are pro Russian. You're not fooling anyone with this Irish neutral bollocks, you're guilty by association with your membership of the EU. Thank fuck the people of the uk have decided to leave your corrupt and twisted club. Pictures of European Parliament leader Guy Verhofstadt were broadcast all over the globe on news stations giving a rabble rousing speech in Kiev to crowds of EU flag waving idiots, he (and the EU) were encouraging and actively supporting an illegal coup in Ukraine, to further EU expansionism. Only they poked the wrong bear, the Russian bear and Putin was having none of it. Putin has outsmarted, outfoxed, and run rings around gullible globalists like you time and time again, and still you continue to swallow Western false narrative propaganda which constantly demonises Russia. Thankfully though more and more people in the west are becoming aware and are not swallowing this narrative anymore. Public opinion in the west was firmly against air strikes in Syria. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"We need to be careful ? We've made this bed ! We should have helped and supported Russia more after the fall of communism instead of just taking advantage of Russias weakness at the time ! A bit like the allies after the First World War , and look what happened ! " There is a lot in what you say,I have to agree with you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You really are deluded. No ones lost an angument...because its your opinion and its my opinion. Thats all it is my friend. You think your thoughts and opinion is correct where i believe it to be wrong. I think my opinion and thoughts are correct where as you believe them to be wrong. Thats all this is...theres no winning or losing arguments when its basically just two guys opinions that differ. So less of the pedastal standing. An opinion is I like steak better than seafood, I prefer the Blue Album to the Red Album, BoJo's hair is ridiculous. Facts are things like Im Irish, the sun is a star and that Russian elections are rigged so Putin cant lose, Russia invaded Crimea and held a sham referendum and that they are waging a disinformation campaign to sow division in the west targetting the less intelligent and parts of western society with a chip on their shoulder. You should really learn the difference." The fact is less intelligent people in the West can't see that the EU destabilised Ukraine in the first place by supporting and encouraging an illegal coup there, to entice Ukraine to join the EU, and further EU expansionism. For fucks sake open your eyes and stop sleep walking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m massively out of touch on this subject ... can someone link me up to a credible analysis of the Ukraine situation ? " Make sure you get the timeline right, unlike Centaur | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m massively out of touch on this subject ... can someone link me up to a credible analysis of the Ukraine situation ? " With the Ukraine thing you can see there are divided opinions. You'd be best looking at a couple news outlets that you are familiar with and have a good reputation for reliableness and truthfulness and see what information they have and see what you think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You really are deluded. No ones lost an angument...because its your opinion and its my opinion. Thats all it is my friend. You think your thoughts and opinion is correct where i believe it to be wrong. I think my opinion and thoughts are correct where as you believe them to be wrong. Thats all this is...theres no winning or losing arguments when its basically just two guys opinions that differ. So less of the pedastal standing. An opinion is I like steak better than seafood, I prefer the Blue Album to the Red Album, BoJo's hair is ridiculous. Facts are things like Im Irish, the sun is a star and that Russian elections are rigged so Putin cant lose, Russia invaded Crimea and held a sham referendum and that they are waging a disinformation campaign to sow division in the west targetting the less intelligent and parts of western society with a chip on their shoulder. You should really learn the difference. The fact is less intelligent people in the West can't see that the EU destabilised Ukraine in the first place by supporting and encouraging an illegal coup there, to entice Ukraine to join the EU, and further EU expansionism. For fucks sake open your eyes and stop sleep walking. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Im Irish, we're neutral. So speak for your own country. And by the way, you literally just did what I said you'd do a few posts earlier. Lose the argument and then start with "whataboutism" where you try and derail the topic at hand and talk about things other people have done instead. The UK have and continue to do some immoral things, but not on the scale of Russia. And considering this is a post about Russia we'll stick to that topic and about their illegal invasions, theyre wide ranging disinformation campaigns, their chemical attacks, their rigged elections, their cyber warfare attacks against us, their corruption and all their other crimes against other countries, their citizens and democracy itself. Irish neutral my arse. You are part of the EU which collectively destabilised the situation in Ukraine by supporting a coup and overthrow of a democratically elected legitimate leader there. The EU (which includes Ireland) sent money to opposition forces there, encouraged Ukraine citizens to otherthrow their democratically elected and legitimate leader, and enticed Ukraine to dump Russia and join the EU, when the EU knew full well it would provoke the Russians and cause disturbance and unrest in Ukraine as many of the citizens who live there are pro Russian. You're not fooling anyone with this Irish neutral bollocks, you're guilty by association with your membership of the EU. Thank fuck the people of the uk have decided to leave your corrupt and twisted club. Pictures of European Parliament leader Guy Verhofstadt were broadcast all over the globe on news stations giving a rabble rousing speech in Kiev to crowds of EU flag waving idiots, he (and the EU) were encouraging and actively supporting an illegal coup in Ukraine, to further EU expansionism. Only they poked the wrong bear, the Russian bear and Putin was having none of it. Putin has outsmarted, outfoxed, and run rings around gullible globalists like you time and time again, and still you continue to swallow Western false narrative propaganda which constantly demonises Russia. Thankfully though more and more people in the west are becoming aware and are not swallowing this narrative anymore. Public opinion in the west was firmly against air strikes in Syria. " The EU supports open democracy. Yanukovych has been found guilty of election fraud, vote tampering and voter intimidation. Maybe thats your idea of a legitimate democratically elected leader (in fact Im sure it is) but thats not the standard the rest of the world follows. The EU offered associative membership to Ukraine which is their right and Ukraine accepted it as was their right. Whether Putin throws a hissy fit about this or not is not the problem of anyone else and free nations should not base their decisions on the emotional outbursts of a faux strongman. The Ukraine had successive governments moving towards EU membership for over a decade. As youre very fond of saying about the UK, the people had the opportunity to vote for anti EU parties but consistently voted for pro EU candidates including Yanukovych who said he would sign the EU deal and then didnt at the last second because Putin pulled on his string. This betrayal of the will of the people is what triggered the uprising. You say Putins in the right and the EU are wrong? The EU had over a decade of voting towards the candidates that supported closer relations. The EU negotiated membership publically over a number of years and allowed the people to know what was going on. Putin sent in armed soldiers without any identification to seize control by force and threat of murder. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |